"Live" Transparency Within PDF 1.3

  • Permalink
  • submit to reddit
  • Email
  • Follow


i went on a rant earlier about adobe indesign createing PDF 1.3
compatible files with live transparency. in response to that statement
a number of people assured me this was not possible as indesign
"flattens" those elements in PDF 1.3.

as a service i have posted an example of one of these files. i do not
have the specifics of how this was created other than it came from
indesign. 

you will notice a HUGE difference if you open this file in acrobat 4
opposed to acrobat 5 or 6. why live transparency exists in a file that
can be opened in acrobat 4 is a bit disturbing to say the least. like
i've said before, i have received at least a half dozen of these from
different customers over the last few months.

the hi-res original PDF file has been stuffit into a 9.2mb .sit file
and it my be downloaded from the following location.

http://www.nrgsoft.com/asian_moon.sit

note: i will only make it available for approx.1 week.

if anyone who can provide some insight into why adobe is allowing this
to occur it would be most appreciated. [no one has been able to provide
me an explanation]

best regards,
dfire
0
Reply dragonsfire_eq (62) 7/24/2004 2:31:41 AM

See related articles to this posting


In article <230720042129048173%dragonsfire_eq@excite.com>,=20
dragonsfire_eq@excite.com says...
> i went on a rant earlier about adobe indesign createing PDF 1.3
> compatible files with live transparency. in response to that statement
> a number of people assured me this was not possible as indesign
> "flattens" those elements in PDF 1.3.
>=20
> as a service i have posted an example of one of these files. i do not
> have the specifics of how this was created other than it came from
> indesign.=20


Ahem, this is *not* a PDF 1.3 file. Here's the start of the header:

%PDF-1.4
%=E2=E3=CF=D3
201 0 obj <</Linearized 1/L 11440365/O 204/E 6152575/N 2/T 11436302/H [=20
6696 578]>>
endobj

So that's a PDF 1.4 file....

BTW, a smaller than 11 Mb file would have been nice...

=20
> you will notice a HUGE difference if you open this file in acrobat 4
> opposed to acrobat 5 or 6.=20

Naturally, Acrobat 4 will not be processing any of the (extensive)=20
transparency in the file. A quick browse reveals a large number of soft=20
masked images, several Form XObjects with Multiply blending mode, I also=20
saw a Luminosity blending mode in the file but can't find where its used=20
(not surprising in such a complex file).


> why live transparency exists in a file that
> can be opened in acrobat 4 is a bit disturbing to say the least.

You can open any version PDF file in any version of Acrobat, you should=20
just get a warning that features may not render as expected (or words to=20
that effect). Interestingly it looks like Acrobat 4 and below don't give=20
you that warning, though 5 and 6 certainly do.=20


> if anyone who can provide some insight into why adobe is allowing this
> to occur it would be most appreciated. [no one has been able to provide
> me an explanation]

An explanation of which ? Why Acrobat 4 opens PDF files of a higher=20
version? They've always done that I think, just because a file claims to=20
be of a higher version doesn't mean it *uses* those features. Many PDF=20
interpreters used to refuse to process versions of PDF higher than they=20
expected, however the number of files that would process successfully=20
was so large that manufacturers followed the Acrobat lead and opened=20
files of any version. With a warning if you were lucky.

Notice that Acrobat 4 *does* correctly describe the file as a PDF 1.4=20
version document.

I don't recall what your actual problem was, but PDF 1.3 files with=20
transparency doesn't seem to be it.

FWIW, we *have* been sent a file declaring itself to be PDF 1.3, but=20
which contained PDF 1.4 transparent elements. This file was produced by=20
InDesign CS (3.0), but had subsequently been edited with some other=20
application. The customer was unable to shed any light on what had been=20
used to edit the file (claimed it hadn't been edited, even though the=20
file had multiple xrefs, and a 'Modified' date in the document=20
properties).=20

Despite extensive attempts we have not so far been able to provoke any=20
version of InDesign into producing PDF 1.3 files which contain=20
transparency which is actually being used in the body of the file.

For the present we have altered the behaviour of our product to allow=20
this anyway, and added a transparency scanner which determines whether=20
any given page has transparency before rendering it (for performance=20
reasons). But we don't at present consider this to be an InDesign bug.=20
If you can provide an InDesign-produced PDF file which hasn't been=20
subsequently edited, and does contain transparent objects, we'd be=20
interested in looking at it.

=09=09=09=09=09Ken
0
Reply ken161 (743) 7/24/2004 11:50:42 AM

Recently, Ken Sharp <ken@spamcop.net> posted:
(great analysis mostly snipped for brevity)
> dragonsfire_eq@excite.com says...
>> i went on a rant earlier about adobe indesign createing PDF 1.3
>> compatible files with live transparency. in response to that
>> statement a number of people assured me this was not possible as
>> indesign "flattens" those elements in PDF 1.3.
>>
>> as a service i have posted an example of one of these files. i do not
>> have the specifics of how this was created other than it came from
>> indesign.
>
>
> Ahem, this is *not* a PDF 1.3 file. Here's the start of the header:
>
> %PDF-1.4
> %����
> 201 0 obj <</Linearized 1/L 11440365/O 204/E 6152575/N 2/T 11436302/H
> [ 6696 578]>>
> endobj
>
> So that's a PDF 1.4 file....
>
(rest snipped)

Thanks for taking the time to go through this and settle the matter. Your
conclusion that ID's PDFs are what they claim to be is consistent with my
experience, as well. There's no telling what some "downstream app" might
do to invalidate the original output.

Regards,

Neil


> BTW, a smaller than 11 Mb file would have been nice...
>
>
>> you will notice a HUGE difference if you open this file in acrobat 4
>> opposed to acrobat 5 or 6.
>
> Naturally, Acrobat 4 will not be processing any of the (extensive)
> transparency in the file. A quick browse reveals a large number of
> soft masked images, several Form XObjects with Multiply blending
> mode, I also saw a Luminosity blending mode in the file but can't
> find where its used (not surprising in such a complex file).
>
>
>> why live transparency exists in a file that
>> can be opened in acrobat 4 is a bit disturbing to say the least.
>
> You can open any version PDF file in any version of Acrobat, you
> should just get a warning that features may not render as expected
> (or words to that effect). Interestingly it looks like Acrobat 4 and
> below don't give you that warning, though 5 and 6 certainly do.
>
>
>> if anyone who can provide some insight into why adobe is allowing
>> this to occur it would be most appreciated. [no one has been able to
>> provide me an explanation]
>
> An explanation of which ? Why Acrobat 4 opens PDF files of a higher
> version? They've always done that I think, just because a file claims
> to be of a higher version doesn't mean it *uses* those features. Many
> PDF interpreters used to refuse to process versions of PDF higher
> than they expected, however the number of files that would process
> successfully was so large that manufacturers followed the Acrobat
> lead and opened files of any version. With a warning if you were
> lucky.
>
> Notice that Acrobat 4 *does* correctly describe the file as a PDF 1.4
> version document.
>
> I don't recall what your actual problem was, but PDF 1.3 files with
> transparency doesn't seem to be it.
>
> FWIW, we *have* been sent a file declaring itself to be PDF 1.3, but
> which contained PDF 1.4 transparent elements. This file was produced
> by InDesign CS (3.0), but had subsequently been edited with some other
> application. The customer was unable to shed any light on what had
> been used to edit the file (claimed it hadn't been edited, even
> though the file had multiple xrefs, and a 'Modified' date in the
> document properties).
>
> Despite extensive attempts we have not so far been able to provoke any
> version of InDesign into producing PDF 1.3 files which contain
> transparency which is actually being used in the body of the file.
>
> For the present we have altered the behaviour of our product to allow
> this anyway, and added a transparency scanner which determines whether
> any given page has transparency before rendering it (for performance
> reasons). But we don't at present consider this to be an InDesign bug.
> If you can provide an InDesign-produced PDF file which hasn't been
> subsequently edited, and does contain transparent objects, we'd be
> interested in looking at it.
>
> Ken


0
Reply neil9133 (816) 7/24/2004 3:07:14 PM

In article <MPG.1b6c320d6760d9ba98978e@news.eclipse.co.uk>, Ken Sharp
<ken@spamcop.net> wrote:

> In article <230720042129048173%dragonsfire_eq@excite.com>, 
> dragonsfire_eq@excite.com says...
> > i went on a rant earlier about adobe indesign createing PDF 1.3
> > compatible files with live transparency. in response to that statement
> > a number of people assured me this was not possible as indesign
> > "flattens" those elements in PDF 1.3.
> > 
> > as a service i have posted an example of one of these files. i do not
> > have the specifics of how this was created other than it came from
> > indesign. 
> 
> 
> Ahem, this is *not* a PDF 1.3 file. Here's the start of the header:
> 
> %PDF-1.4
> %����
> 201 0 obj <</Linearized 1/L 11440365/O 204/E 6152575/N 2/T 11436302/H [ 
> 6696 578]>>
> endobj
> 
> So that's a PDF 1.4 file....
> 
> BTW, a smaller than 11 Mb file would have been nice...


i apologize for the error on my part. i wasn't aware of an issue with
acrobat 4 reading PDF 1.4 and 1.5 without a warning.  i incorrectly
pegged the problem as something it wasn't and really should of taken
some additional time to fully check this over after i pulled it off of
backup.

i also apologize on the file size, but i wanted to use the original
file in it's unaltered state from the customer.


------------
> > why live transparency exists in a file that
> > can be opened in acrobat 4 is a bit disturbing to say the least.
> 
> You can open any version PDF file in any version of Acrobat, you should 
> just get a warning that features may not render as expected (or words to 
> that effect). Interestingly it looks like Acrobat 4 and below don't give 
> you that warning, though 5 and 6 certainly do. 


which helps explain adobe's position on people using older versions of
their software. [they don't care!]



> > if anyone who can provide some insight into why adobe is allowing this
> > to occur it would be most appreciated. [no one has been able to provide
> > me an explanation]
> 
> An explanation of which ? Why Acrobat 4 opens PDF files of a higher 
> version? 

thanks ken for your detailed description of the testing you have done
in regard to this situation. [very helpful and appreciated]

it sounds like there is a programming flaw in acrobat 3 and 4 that
adobe realized when creating acrobat 5, but never bothered to go back
and fix with acrobat 3 and 4. if adobe 4 is only 1.3 compatible why on
earth is it able to open PDF 1.4 and 1.5 files?  [just because a PDF
1.4 file *may* contain only PDF 1.3 information is ridiculous. it
should be *all* or *nothing* when you upgrade]

i have been browsing the tech notes on adobe's site about the issue and
everything that i can find explains something to the following.

Support Knowledgebase 
Document 323854
-------------------
Additional Information 
-------------------
Acrobat and Acrobat Reader may be unable to read PDF files created by a
later version that has the Compatibility option set to a later version;
instead, Acrobat or Acrobat Reader returns an error when you open the
files.

You can create PDF files that an earlier version can recognize by
choosing the Compatibility option that matches that version; however,
the resulting PDF file doesn't retain new, version-specific features.




> I don't recall what your actual problem was, but PDF 1.3 files with 
> transparency doesn't seem to be it.

the problem is that these files can be imported directly into quark 4
using pdf filter 1.6. that's a HUGE problem in that they obviously do
not process correctly.

please note: this is not a prepress procedure but a practice used for
importing supplied ads for magazine and newspaper layout. at the
present the best we can hope for is opening these in acrobat 5, saving
them as an eps and then redistilling them with acrobat 4.0
compatibility. [using the eps from acrobat doesn't always work because
they have to be in a postscript level 1 format for quark 4]

i realize our current operations don't have the ideal setup for
handling this but the company isn't a point where they want to purchase
25 new computers and software upgrades for mac OSX.



> For the present we have altered the behaviour of our product to allow 
> this anyway, and added a transparency scanner which determines whether 
> any given page has transparency before rendering it (for performance 
> reasons). 

what *product* are you refering to? sounds like it might be worth a
look.

thanks again!
dfire
0
Reply dragonsfire_eq (62) 7/24/2004 3:43:54 PM
comp.publish.prepress 3353 articles. 0 followers. Post

3 Replies
60 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 58


  • Permalink
  • submit to reddit
  • Email
  • Follow


Reply:

Similar Artilces:

"Live" Transparency Within PDF 1.3
i went on a rant earlier about adobe indesign createing PDF 1.3 compatible files with live transparency. in response to that statement a number of people assured me this was not possible as indesign "flattens" those elements in PDF 1.3. as a service i have posted an example of one of these files. i do not have the specifics of how this was created other than it came from indesign. you will notice a HUGE difference if you open this file in acrobat 4 opposed to acrobat 5 or 6. why live transparency exists in a file that can be opened in acrobat 4 is a bit disturbing to say the least...

Slax 5.1.8 live CD PDF/Transparency probs when X11-FONTS-MISC module added
Hi there, Firstly this is not about Slax installed on my HD it is about the SLAX 5.1.8 live CD. I added the X11-misc-fonts module to the distro and re-burnt the iso image. The live CD boots up fine and loads perfectly. However, after the X11-fonts-misc module was added Kpdf / xpdf viewer does not read any of the text in a pdf file , only graphics. Prior to adding this module it worked fine. Also when using Fluxbox I cannot get the "transparency" effects to work on my toolbar and menus ( although I can get transparency in aterm). When X11-fonts-misc is not installed I get transparency...

[News] Vector Linux 6.0 Light Live CD is Released, Clonezilla 1.2.3-1 Also
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Vector Linux 6.0 Light Live CD ,----[ Quote ] | The Vector Linux team is happy to announce Vector Linux 6.0 Light LIVE. | | This version is intended as a preview of the traditional installable release. | It closely mirrors the original VL Light, but some packages have been added | or upgraded, including the 2.6.27.29 kernel. `---- http://vectorlinux.com/news/vector-linux-6.0-light-live-cd Clonezilla 1.2.3-1 http://www.clonezilla.org/ Recent: Vector Linux - An interesting choice ,----[ Quote ] | Vector is definitely a very interesting ...

PBXPress Live CD Demo 1.1
PBXpress is a modern-day replacement for traditional PBX systems. Instead of working with wires and cables, it utilizes Internet technologies. In particular, it uses VoIP (voice over IP) technology to transmit calls. All of your phones are connected and provisioned via an IP network, your calls can be delivered to any place on Earth via Internet at a fraction of the usual cost, and all system configuring is done from your web browser! In addition to new exciting features, PBXpress offers the reliability of good old telephony service: in case of any problem with your Internet connect...

iSeries Live and Flash Demos matrix - i5 Live Demonstrations
So many of our customers have either not heard of, or have not seen some of the cool applications like iSeries Access ofr Web, Portal, or HATS (now WDHT) running on an iSeries. The attachment contains a Live and Flash demo matrix with links to these applications. Many of the links go to public servers that you can test drive. I encourage you to explore and enjoy. Darryl Johns IBM System i Strategic Workloads Specialist (opinions expressed are not necessarily those of my employer) ...

Re: OT
Bob Koehler wrote: > In article <44F8AEC5.4090206@comcast.net>, bradhamilton <bradhamilton@comcast.net> writes: >> The last time I checked, it's not possible to run WU without IE. That's >> the only reason to keep IE on a Windows box (not to mention enjoying the >> delicious irony of *needing* to run a potentially insecure application >> in order to keep the underlying "O/S" (GUI add-on?) secure). :-) > > The last time I checked this was one of the claims that the > previously mentioned web site debunks. I've sin...

Nessus password on Knoppix 5.1.1 live CD
Dang! Isn't there any decent knoppix newsgroups? Well anyway, I'm running the new knoppix 5.1.1 and trying to get nessus to run. I put some crap in the /etc/nessus/nessus.conf file and started the nessus daemon and nessus-mkcert and all that stuff and the plugins load up just fine ...all 2800 of 'em... and everything is just peachy. Except the password doesn't work. O'Reilly's Knoppix Hacks (actually for knop 5.0) says that the login should read: nessusd host: localhost port: 1241 login: knoppix password: knoppix Well, no cigar. All I get is a "login failed...

Active@ Boot Disk (Live CD) 5.3.3
Active@ Boot Disk (Live CD ) is a bootable Windows LiveCD /DVD/USB/ Flash for system recovery purposes. Use Active@ Boot Disk (Live CD) to recover your lost data, reset Windows passwords, make computer system backups, and securely erase data and much more. It includes many tools to boot up a computer and fix most startup, PC configuration, and system management problems. More Info: http://www.livecd.com/ Download URL: http://software.lsoft.net/BootDiskDemo-Setup.exe Screenshot URL: http://www.livecd.com/images/screenshot.gif Order Page: http://www.livecd.com/ ...

[News] Review of Sabayon Linux 3.3 Live DVD
Review: Sabayon Linux 3.3 ,----[ Quote ] | Sabayon Linux 3.3 is definitely worth your consideration if you're | looking for a distribution that has all the latest stuff. It's very | well put together and the hardware support seems to be top notch as | well. If you've tried it out, let me know your thoughts. `---- http://www.triedit.org/review/review-sabayon-linux-33/#more-67 Related: Sabayon Linux v3.3 DVD ,----[ Quote ] | Sabayon Linux, a LiveDVD distribution known for being based upon | Gentoo and its inclusion of desktop eye-candy such as Beryl and XGL, | has reached versi...

SB Live 7.1 vs ESS 1938 Solo-1
I have 2 PCs with my main game machine using an ESS 1938 Solo-1, and my second PC using an old Xwave QS3000a soundcard. I only use headphones plugged into the amplifies output jacks of both soundcards. The Xwave QS3000a sounds horrible as it is a Win95/98 era card, while the ESS card sounds pretty good, exspecially with CD Audio, and MP3s. Games sound good as well, even though it has no 3D sound chip. I'm wanting to replace the Xwave card, but I'm wondering if I should upgrade the ESS card to something like a SB Live 7.1 (budget is a factor here), and pass the ESS to replace...

[Live Broadcast] FMPug TV will broadcast live today at 1 PM EDT
Has your FileMaker database been touched? Andy Gaunt will give a live video presentation today at 1:00 PM EDT at http://fmpug.tv Andy will be demonstrating FMTouch on the Apple iPhone. This live broadcast will demonstrate the power of FMTouch and how you can run a fully relational database system on the Apple iPhone or iPod touch without relying on an internet connection. The presentation is live and you can chat one on one with the developers of FMTouch as well as with Andy and his assistants during the broadcast. For the first time ever, you can use the relational power of FileMaker on a...

[ANN] live_ast 1.0, now with transparent integration -- ParseTree for Ruby 1.9
http://quix.github.com/live_ast Since its initial announcement, live_ast has acquired the ability to (practically) fully emulate ParseTree for Ruby 1.9. The awkward ast_eval stand-in for eval is no longer necessary. The following now works on MRI and JRuby (and will work on Rubinius when it implements more 1.9.2 features). % gem install live_ast % gem install boc require 'live_ast/full' f = eval "lambda { 'foo' }" p f.to_ast # => s(:iter, s(:call, nil, :lambda, s(:arglist)), nil, s(:str, "foo")) IRB support has also been ad...

Brand New P4 System (1)+ 1 year warranty + free delivery within GTA
Motherboard Magic-Pro P4PE-L RAM 256MB DDR PC-2700 Hard Drive Maxtor 60GB 7200rpm Floppy Drive 1.44MB FDD DVD-ROM LG 48X CD-RW/16X DVD Combo Case Enlight 300W w/ USB Front Video Card Hercules GeForce2 64MB DDR Sound Card Onboard Sound Monitor Samsung 955DF 19" Keyboard Logitech Cordless Keyboard Mouse Logitech Cordless Mouse Speakers Creative FPS-1600 CPU Pentium 4 1.8A GHz $1115 Pentium 4 2.4B GHz $1165...

M$ Live =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tiles=AE_baaad_copycat_from_Andro?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?id_ICS?=
[quote] Vole has been marketing Windows� 8 Live Tiles� as the latest and greatest since sliced bread (as usual). Unfortunately *this Chinese video* of my current Tablet proves that Live Tiles� are nothing but baaad copycat from Google Android ICS. Microsoft� INNOVA~1� at its best :-D (evil laughter) On Android ICS they are simply widgets, which show the latest updates of your email and social media, or whatever widget you place on one of the preferred multiple "virtual desktops". You simply have the ability to "browse" trough the history, by tipping th...

[News] Linux Releases: Bluewhite64 Live DVD, Paldo 1.11, Absolute 12.0.1
Bluewhite64 Linux Live DVD [Released] ,----[ Quote ] | Bluewhite64 Linux 12.0 Live DVD runs entirely from DVD and includes all | packages from Bluewhite64 Linux 12.0 ... `---- http://www.bluewhite64.com/page.php?25 paldo [Linux] 1.11 released ,----[ Quote ] | paldo 1.11 has been released with many bug fixes and updates. | | Enhancements to point out: | | * OpenOffice 2.2.1 | * Linux 2.6.21.6 | * GNOME 2.18.3 | * VirtualBox 1.4.0 | * Eclipse 3.3 | * KDE 3.5.7 | * Proprietary NVIDIA driver for legacy chips `---- http://www.paldo.org/ Absolute 12.0.1 [Linux] ...

[News] DragonFly BSD Live CD (1.8) Released; ELive Linux Live CD Reviewed
DragonFly - January 2007 Release 1.8.x Download ,----[ Quote ] | The CD includes an installer that can be run at the | console, or (experimentally) via a web browser. `---- http://www.dragonflybsd.org/community/release1_8.shtml E is for elegant with Elive live CD ,----[ Quote ] | Elive is a live CD Linux distribution based on Debian that uses | the Enlightenment window manager. Elive aims to provide an | aesthetically pleasing environment with a full suite of desktop | applications that runs efficiently on older systems. Its developers | aren't finished yet, but they've come a long...

FileWatcher 3.3 released
Continuously monitor a folder or group of folders for files arriving, then trigger a custom action, such as running a second program with the new files. File Watcher only processes files when they are completely written out to disk, which is perfect for huge files such as video. Incoming files can be grouped together or processed individually. File and Folder Watcher 3.3 can be used to: * Pre-process photos as you take them, using Adobe Droplets * Process incoming FTP files * Automatically distil PDF files * Data mine incoming files with TextPipe Pro, also from DataMystic * Proc...

[News] New Reviews of Tiny Core Linux 2.1, CDLinux 0.9.2, Live Linux Gaming 0.9.5, PCLinuxOS Minime 09.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tiny Core Linux 2.1 ,----[ Quote ] | They say that good things come in small packages and so it is with Tiny Core | Linux, a diminutive but powerful distribution. TCL weighs in at an incredibly | petite 11MB when you download it. Yes, it really is that tiny. Tiny Core | Linux is based on Busybox, the Linux 2.6 kernel, JWM, Fltk and Tiny X. `---- http://desktoplinuxreviews.com/2009/07/01/tiny-core-linux-2-1/ CDLinux 0.9.2 Community Edition Review ,----[ Quote ] | Five weeks ago when I wrote an overview of Debris Linux I received a number ...

PPC LIVES!!!1!
>From Engadget: Furthermore, the (optional/add-on yet curiously mandatory) hard drive will run some sort of operating system, which will likely be Linux by default - but Kutaragi envisions other operating systems running on top of the Cell kernel as applications: "other PC operating systems can run too, such as Windows and Tiger, if the publishers want to do so." http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000833046205 plz Apple plz plz plz make me an OS for PS3... 256MB is enough RAM, right? You bastards. In article <1118372059.082769.186410@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, imout...

Knoppix live #3
Hi Dave. What you have written is very interesting indeed and very encouraging too. It has always been my desire to kick windows into touch, but sadly I have not got there yet. I tried Linux several times in the past but the difficulties in installing to the hard drive discouraged me till I finally gave up. Knoppix live has revived the desire and I am impressed with what I have been able to do to date. I have to facility to install to hard drive and can see that one day I shall. Soon I hope. But there are some problems I cannot solve, like the Chess game XBoard (you have to have...

Live CDs #3
Okay, I'm pig-sick of reading silly pissing-contest posts and tripe about MS/Vista, so here's a hardy perennial to generate some actual *Linux-based* discussion/advocacy. What's the best things about Live CDs? Which ones do you like/which do you think are the most useful or the best of breed? What would your ideal Live CD consist of? Do you use Live DVDs? Me, I wouldn't be without SLAX, despite it being a purely KDE offering and I'm currently a real Gnome fan. Sabayon and Kororaa are great for showing off 3D effects. And Elive is wonderful for demonstrating a really diffe...

Messenger Plus! Live #3
Messenger Plus! Live is the one essential add-on for Windows Live Messenger. Installed more than 350 million times since 2001, when it started as a simple add-on for MSN Messenger 3, Messenger Plus! is guaranteed to improve your Messenger experience by leaps and bounds. You won't just get a couple of new options, what you'll get is a whole new dimension for the Windows Live Messenger software. For more on this subject check out this cool site www.msgpluslive.net ...

SB Live on RH7.3
Hello. I have a SB Live card (w/ the emu10k1 chip) and up until a few months ago it worked perfectly in my setup (RH 7.3 currently). Then, I had some problems w/ the machine and ended up putting in a new motherboard (which has onboard AC97 sound). The first time I booted the machine w/ the new mobo, the Redhat hardware detection thing came on and set it was going to update the settings for that card ... unwisely I said sure as I wasn't really paying attention. (Note that the SB Live was not in the machine at the time, was just 'test booting'). I have since disabled the AC97 au...

Ubuntu Live Runlevel 1
I'm having problems with X11. Does anyone know how to boot Ubuntu Live 5.10 to runlevel 1? A boot parameter perhaps? I've been unabel to reach the virual console by using crtl+option+F1, or command+option+F1. Thanks, Charles Boot option for runlevel 1 (single user mode): live capser-udeb/runlevel=S ...

SB Live! 5.1
I'v got SB Live 5.1 with ac3 decoder, under Windows a can very easly use that function but under Linux I don't know how to set up my sound card to run that ac3 decoder. Do you know what to do? ...