f



[ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] ACE+TAO+CIAO - x.3.6 released

Hi Folks,

        Thanks again to everyone from the DOC group and the
ACE+TAO+CIAO user communities who helped get the x.3.6 beta out the
door.  As Bala mentioned, it's really important to get your feedback
before we release the ACE+TAO+CIAO x.4 release since that will become
the baseline for the next round of commercially supported products.
I know it's a busy time of year for lots of people, but we'd really
appreciate your help testing this beta to ensure that the forthcoming
official x.4 release will work well on as many platforms as possible!

Thanks very much,

        Doug
0
schmidt7304 (285)
12/18/2003 5:14:47 PM
comp.soft-sys.ace 20326 articles. 1 followers. marlow.andrew (167) is leader. Post Follow

2 Replies
880 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 32

When will the x.4 release be out?
Ed

"Douglas C. Schmidt" <schmidt@cs.wustl.edu> wrote in message
news:200312181713.LAA27082@ace.cs.wustl.edu...
>
> Hi Folks,
>
>         Thanks again to everyone from the DOC group and the
> ACE+TAO+CIAO user communities who helped get the x.3.6 beta out the
> door.  As Bala mentioned, it's really important to get your feedback
> before we release the ACE+TAO+CIAO x.4 release since that will become
> the baseline for the next round of commercially supported products.
> I know it's a busy time of year for lots of people, but we'd really
> appreciate your help testing this beta to ensure that the forthcoming
> official x.4 release will work well on as many platforms as possible!
>
> Thanks very much,
>
>         Doug


0
12/19/2003 5:52:34 AM
Hi Ed,

>> When will the x.4 release be out?

Early January, assuming all goes well between now and then.

Take care,

        Doug

>> "Douglas C. Schmidt" <schmidt@cs.wustl.edu> wrote in message
>> news:200312181713.LAA27082@ace.cs.wustl.edu...
>> >
>> > Hi Folks,
>> >
>> >         Thanks again to everyone from the DOC group and the
>> > ACE+TAO+CIAO user communities who helped get the x.3.6 beta out the
>> > door.  As Bala mentioned, it's really important to get your feedback
>> > before we release the ACE+TAO+CIAO x.4 release since that will become
>> > the baseline for the next round of commercially supported products.
>> > I know it's a busy time of year for lots of people, but we'd really
>> > appreciate your help testing this beta to ensure that the forthcoming
>> > official x.4 release will work well on as many platforms as possible!
>> >
>> > Thanks very much,
>> >
>> >         Doug
>> 
>> 









-- 
Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt, Professor           TEL: (615) 343-8197
Electrical Engineering and Computer Science FAX: (615) 343-7440
Vanderbilt University                       WEB: www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/
Nashville, TN 37203                         NET: d.schmidt@vanderbilt.edu
0
schmidt7304 (285)
12/19/2003 5:42:28 PM
Reply:

Similar Artilces:

RE: [ace-users] ACE+TAO+CIAO
Hi, Please use the prf form and which configuration you build. I personally think you have an old version of ACE/TAO on the system that is used. Regards, Johnny > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu > [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Domingos Monteiro > Sent: donderdag 9 juni 2005 18:05 > To: Simon McQueen > Cc: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: Re: [ace-users] ACE+TAO+CIAO - 5.4.6 + 1.4.6 + 0.4.6 released > > Hi, > > I've just dowloaded this version > I've started to compile ACE with > - MSVC 7.1 > - Win XP > And get the following link errors: > > Message_Block.obj : error LNK2005: "public: virtual void __thiscall > ACE_Deadline_Message_Strategy::convert_priority(class ACE_Time_Value > &,class ACE_Message_Block const &)" > (?convert_priority@ACE_Deadline_Message_Strategy@@UAEXAAVACE_T > ime_Value@@ABVACE_Message_Block@@@Z) > already defined in CDR_Size.obj > Message_Block.obj : error LNK2005: "public: virtual void __thiscall > ACE_Laxity_Message_Strategy::convert_priority(class ACE_Time_Value > &,class ACE_Message_Block const &)" > (?convert_priority@ACE_Laxity_Message_Strategy@@UAEXAAVACE_Tim > e_Value@@ABVACE_Message_Block@@@Z) > already defined in CDR_Size.obj > SString.obj : error LNK2005: "public: __thiscall > ACE_NS_WString::ACE_N...

[ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] Contribution to ACE
Hi Ishay, >> I will submit it soon. Great, thanks. >> The solution is implemented as part of my company internal framework. It is >> not written with the coding style of ace. >> >> Should I do some kind of adjustment before submitting it to the group? Yes - please see http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/docs/ACE-guidelines.html for instructions on how to conform to the ACE programming guidelines. >> Should I rewrite it so it will compile with the ace library? Yes, please try to get things working "out of the box" so that we can integrate it easily. Also, please add a "one button" test following the style of the various tests in $ACE_ROOT/tests/*_Test.cpp so that we can ensure that your changes work properly. >> Also, In order to integrate it as part of ace frameworks it will >> need some changes in the implementation. Are you referring to changes in the ACE implementation or to your framework's implementation? Thanks, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt Professor and Associate Chair Electrical Engineering and Computer Science TEL: (615) 343-8197 Institute for Software Integrated Systems WEB: www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/~schmidt Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN, 37203 NET: d.schmidt@vanderbilt.edu ...

[ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] ACE-warnings
Hi, Thanks for using the PRF form. It seems you are using compiler options we are not using in our builds. What I have done is setup a small ACE build with some extra warnings enabled, see http://www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/scoreboard/integrated.html for the SuSE_92_GCC3.3.4_x86_64_extended_warnings build. It seems some work can be done, if you have patches to improve things, send them to the mailing list (make then bases on 5.4.2, 5.4 is almost a year old) and we can see if we can apply them. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Leeghwaterstraat 25 2811 DT Reeuwijk The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl "Sponsel Carsten (ext)" <carsten.sponsel@erln.gepas.de> wrote in message news:<0FD43CFFD4EB254AB6D0D172007FF6010396C653@erlh907a.med.siemens.de>... > ACE VERSION: 5.4 > > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > AMD Opteron with RedHawk Linux 2.2 (based on Kernel 2.6.3) > > TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: same > > COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): gcc (GCC) 3.2.3 20030502 (Red > Hat Linux 3.2.3-20) > > CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h: > > CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU (unless > this isn't used in this case, e.g., with Microsoft Visual C++): > > AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: > COMPILATION > > SYNOPSIS: > Compiler-Warnings > > DESCRIPTION: > > I'm astonish...

[ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] DCLP and ACE
Hi Yongwei, >> Has anyone here read the DDJ article "C++ and the Perils of >> Double-Checked Locking"? It is available at this URL: >> >> http://www.ddj.com/documents/ddj0408l/ >> >> Regretfully registration is needed to read it. >> >> In brief, Scott Meyers and Andrei Alexandrescu talked about why DCLP is >> unsafe, esp. on multiprocessor environments. The most difficult part >> seems to be the Alpha Reordering problem, described at >> >> http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel/AlphaReordering.html >> >> And thus DCLP could be impossible, unless some memory barrier is >> inserted in every read! The topic of memory barriers for the Alpha and ACE_Singleton is discussed in the DCLP description in POSA2 <www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/POSA/>. If you'd like to contribute portable patches that add this capability to $ACE_ROOT/ace/Singleton.cpp that would be great. We (i.e., the DOC groups at WU/VU/UCI) don't have a Alpha platform in our possession, so if you would like to provide one that we could use to run regression tests on our auto-build virtual scoreboard <www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/scoreboard/> that would be great. Thanks, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt, Professor TEL: (615) 343-8197 Electrical Engineering and Computer Science FAX: (615) 343-7440 Vanderbilt University WEB: ww...

RE: [ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] ACE & POSIX
Hey there's a thought. ;-) I like it. Kindly, Graham -----Original Message----- From: owner-ace-bugs@cse.wustl.edu [mailto:owner-ace-bugs@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Stephen Torri Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 9:38 PM To: Douglas C. Schmidt Cc: ace-bugs@cs.wustl.edu Subject: Re: [ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] ACE & POSIX Douglas C. Schmidt wrote: > Hi Folks, > > >>Yes, but it sure would make the ACE libraries smaller and potentially >>easier to maintain. A lot of the OS specific code would go away. ;-) > > > Ah, but there's rub! It will actually make ACE much larger and harder > to maintain since there will be many platforms/compiler that don't > support the new standard for many years, so it will be necessary to > support multiple variants! Having said that, I welcome these > enhancements since I think they will help improve the relevance of C++ > (cf Java), but it won't make ACE smaller and easier to maintain > (unfortunately)! > > Take care, > > Doug So consider it a new opportunity to develop new design patterns, write more papers and books, and become financially independent. ;) Stephen ...

[ace-users] RE: [ace-bugs] Building ACE: Error on SGI Irix6.5 w/ g++3.3 #2
-----Original Message----- From: Krishnakumar B [mailto:kitty@dre.vanderbilt.edu] Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 1:35 PM To: Waltersdorf, Brian J Cc: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu Subject: RE: [ace-bugs] Building ACE: Error on SGI Irix6.5 w/ g++3.3 >On Wednesday, 21 July 2004, Waltersdorf, Brian J wrote: >> >> The patch seemed to work much better. ACE compiled and linked without >> errors. There were one or two of the tests that failed to compile. A >> handfull of the tests failed/core dumped. Below is the output from >> run_test.pl script. I'll compile and run it with the IRIX compilers and >> get back to you. >> >> Thanks, >> -Brian >> Running Basic_Types_Test >> Error: Basic_Types_Test FAILED with exit status 1 >> Error: (log/Basic_Types_Test.log): assertion failed >> "ACE_SIZEOF_LONG_DOUBLE: %u%s": 16 != 8 > >Just change line 39 of config-irix6.x-common.h to 16 instead of 8. I guess >GCC reports correct sizes for long doubles now. Thanks. That fixed that one. >> Error: ././Dirent_Test does not exist or is not runnable > >What happens if you run this executable by hand? Does this executable exist >at all in the directory? This test did not compile. It couldn't find sysent.h. I beleive something is messed up with our version of g++ finding the proper system includes. >> Running Log_Msg_Test >> The fo...

[ace-users] ACE+TAO+CIAO
Hi all, We are pleased to announce the latest ACE+TAO+CIAO beta. This beta has been tagged ACE+TAO+CIAO-5_5_6. The main difference between this release and x.5.5 is that the ACE exception macros (except for ACE_THROW_RETURN and ACE_THROW_SPEC) have been removed from all TAO and CIAO code. It is available from the same download location as per the previous release. http://download.dre.vanderbilt.edu/ The doxygen documentation for the beta is also available. Included with this beta, besides the packages combined of sources and generate makefiles, we also provide source only packages for the group of users which use MPC to generate their own makefiles. We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your applications, and let us know if you encounter any problems. Please use the: $ACE_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $TAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $CIAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM so that we have the proper version/platform/compiler/options you're using to report problems. We also request that you take a look at: $TAO_ROOT/docs/releasenotes/ for the status of various ongoing projects at the DOC groups of WashU, UCI, and Vanderbilt to move ACE+TAO+CIAO forward. Overviews of our recent progress and upcoming plans are available at: $ACE_ROOT/NEWS $TAO_ROOT/NEWS $CIAO_ROOT/NEWS The overall success rates for the test results gathered from all our daily builds is 96% for the ACE tests and 92% for the TAO tests. Please see: http://ww...

Re: [ace-bugs] RE: FW: [ace-users] ACE & POSIX
Hi Graham, >> Having spent most of my time in the murky world of real-time >> embedded systems (for the medical industry) I can tell you this. >> It is quite unlikely that the "old dodgers" (according to your >> definition I would fall into that category) would upgrade their >> version of ACE. If the current (or older) version of ACE works why >> upgrade? That's not been our experience working with scores of companies during the past decade. There are many companies who are stuck using older compiler platforms, but are quite happy to upgrade to newer versions of ACE, particularly when those versions fix important bugs, improve compile-/run-time performance, and/or add useful features. In fact, companies like OCI do a good business supporting precisely these sorts of uesrs. >> The old gnu 2.7.2 compiler that was mentioned earlier is most >> likely the compiler that is used by Windriver's IDE Tornado (which >> I use daily). Tornado 2.0.2 for Intel CPUs uses a snapshot of the >> (2.7.2) gnu compiler (Although Windriver doesn't like to admit it. >> I don't know how they get around the open source rules.). Even the >> "new" version of Tornado coming out this fall uses a newer but >> still older version of the gnu compiler. But rumor has it that the >> Diablo compiler, which has been recently only available for >> Motorola C...

[ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] ACE support for IPv6
Hi Vivek, >> Could anyone send me some documentation or links on how IPv6 is >> handled in ACE and usage related documentation. I believe this is described in the ACE Programmer's Guide book, which you can obtain from http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0201699710/qid=1066059513/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_1/102-5569290-4943326?v=glance&s=books&n=507846 There are also examples in $ACE_ROOT/tests/*IPv6.cpp $ACE_ROOT/tests/*IPV6.cpp Take care, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt, Professor TEL: (615) 343-8197 Electrical Engineering and Computer Science FAX: (615) 343-7440 Vanderbilt University WEB: www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ Nashville, TN 37203 NET: d.schmidt@vanderbilt.edu ...

[ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] Moving to ACE? #2
Hi Roger, >> Could you please explain these kernel problems on Linux? I think there are two problems: .. There are (were) bugs in the Linux implementation of the aio_*() functions. These manifested themselves by failures of the $ACE_ROOT/tests/Proactor_Test.cpp on Linux. .. The Linux kernel implements the aio_*() functions by spawning a thread for each asynchronous request, which sort of defeats the point of asynchronous I/O! Take care, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt, Professor TEL: (615) 343-8197 Electrical Engineering and Computer Science FAX: (615) 343-7440 Vanderbilt University WEB: www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ Nashville, TN 37203 NET: d.schmidt@vanderbilt.edu ...

[ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] How to use the IPV6 in ACE?
Hi, Thanks for using the PRF. >> TAO VERSION: 1.3 >> ACE VERSION: 5.3 You definitely want to upgrade to ACE 5.4.1, which you can obtain from the "usual place" at http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html >> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: >> Intel P4/Windows 2000 Server SP4 >> SUN Ultra/ Solaris 8 >> >> TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: >> COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): >> VC7.1 >> SUN Workshop Forte C++ 6 update 1 >> >> AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: >> N/A >> >> DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT: >> COMPILATION? >> No >> LINKING? >> No >> EXECUTION? >> No >> >> SYNOPSIS: >> I want to know how to use IPv6 in ACE/TAO and where i can find the docs and examples. Please see ACE_ROOT/tests/INET_Addr_Test_IPV6.cpp ACE_ROOT/tests/Max_Default_Port_Test_IPV6.cpp ACE_ROOT/tests/Multicast_Test_IPV6.cpp ACE_ROOT/tests/Multihomed_INET_Addr_Test_IPV6.cpp ACE_ROOT/tests/Proactor_Test_IPV6.cpp ACE_ROOT/tests/SOCK_Send_Recv_Test_IPV6.cpp for a number of examples. Steve, does APG have any documentation for the IPV6 stuff? Thanks, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt, Professor TEL: (615) 343-8197 Electrical Engineering and Computer Science F...

[ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] Using ACE with COM
Hi Zvika, Thanks for using the PRF. >> ACE VERSION: 5.4.2 >> >> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: >> Windos XP Pro, winsock2 >> >> TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: >> COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): >> MSVC6 SP5 >> >> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h [if you use a link to a platform- >> specific file, simply state which one]: >> #include "config-win32.h" >> >> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU (unless >> this isn't used in this case, e.g., with Microsoft Visual C++): >> >> AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: >> [What example failed? What module failed to compile?] >> >> DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT: >> COMPILATION? NO >> LINKING? NO >> On Unix systems, did you run make realclean first? >> EXECUTION? YES >> OTHER (please specify)? >> [Please indicate whether ACE, your application, or both are affected.] >> >> SYNOPSIS: >> We are working on a big project that involves ACE. We need to interface the >> part that uses ACE to other Windows based applications >> that need to remain unaware of the underlying implementation. The obvious >> method is to use COM,...

[ace-users] Re: ACE/TAO build problems on Solaris 2.8 using gcc 3.3.6
Hi Neal, >> I am trying to build ACE-5.5 and TAO-1.5 on a SPARC Solaris 2.8 system >> using gcc 3.3.6 and GNU make 3.80. >> >> The build is failing in ACE_wrappers/build/TAO/orbsvcs/orbsvcs (output >> included below) and I was wondering if anyone had any suggestions as to >> what the problem may be. >> >> What is puzzling to me is that the lines in question are all comment >> lines. For example the "01.ps" invalid token on line 15 of >> CosProperty.idl is from the following comment line: >> >> // ftp://ftp.omg.org/pub/docs/1995/95-06-01.ps >> >> If I replace the "//" style comments with "/* ... */" style comments >> the errors go away. Wow, that's pretty weird. I recommend you upgrade to a newer version of GCC - perhaps there's a problem with the version of CPP that's being used on your platform since that's what the TAO IDL compiler uses under the hood to pre-process the IDL files. If you check out our Solaris autobuilds for TAO at http://www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/scoreboard/ you'll see that we're running with GCC 3.4.3 and 4.0.2 and they work fine. Jeff, do you see anything obvious here? Thanks, Doug >> If any additional information would be useful please let me know and I >> will be happy to provide it. >> >> Making all in orbsvcs >> /fs30/t...

[ace-users] ACE/TAO 6.3.3/2.3.3 RPMs available!
Hi, We have uploaded the new micro release to OpenSuSE Build Service which now provides RPMs for this new micro release. For more details see ORBzone.org at http://www.orbzone.org/node/387 Best regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Looking for support and consultancy related to ACE/TAO, see http://www.theaceorb.nl! ...

Re: [ace-users] ACE+TAO+CIAO
Hi Kalil, Thanks very much for your email. Please make sure to send all questions related to TAO or ACE to the ACE mailing list or ACE+TAO newsgroup, rather than to me directly since I travel frequently and often don't have ready access to email. See http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE-mail.html for more info on how to access these resources. > I have a Ubuntu Linux in my machine and I need to install > ACE+TAO+CIAO. What is the easier way to install the latest release > ACE+TAO+CIAO? Please download ACE+TAO x.5.1, which you can obtain from http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html and follow the instructions in the ACE_ROOT/ACE-INSTALL.html TAO_ROOT/TAO-INSTALL.html CIAO_ROOT/CIAO-INSTALL.html Take care, Doug ...

[ace-bugs] Re: FW: [ace-users] ACE & POSIX
Hi Graham, >> Hmm...I guess that's if you wanted to support multiple variants. >> Personally, I would freeze development of the current version of >> ACE (if the additions to C++ were made) and let the old dodgers >> play with their old antiquated compilers and start a new smaller >> version of ACE using the new C++ additions. Maybe that would help >> create a demand for compliant compilers and/or even motivate the >> old dodgers to update their compilers? That way the 'rub' goes >> away, correct? Nope, because the "old dodgers" are the people who are using ACE for the most long-lived and interesting applications (e.g., hard-core distributed real-time and embedded systems) and who are most often the sponsors of our R&D activities in the DOC group and the customers of ACE+TAO support companies like OCI, Riverace, PrismTech, and Remedy. To cut off support for them means that the sources of funding dry up, which means that there's no DOC group to do the work, which means that ACE gradually withers away, etc. Having said that, if you or others want to volunteer to do the legwork to get ACE working with new C++ features that would be great. Take care, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt, Professor TEL: (615) 343-8197 Electrical Engineering and Computer Science FAX: (615) 343-7440 Vanderbilt University WEB: www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ ...

[ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] ACE Reliable Multicast Protocol
Hi Sven, >> i'm searching for informations about the ACE reliable multicast >> protocol. Is there any documentation for this and where can I find >> this documentation? Please see $ACE_ROOT/TMCast/README Take care, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt, Professor TEL: (615) 343-8197 Electrical Engineering and Computer Science FAX: (615) 343-7440 Vanderbilt University WEB: www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ Nashville, TN 37203 NET: d.schmidt@vanderbilt.edu ...

[ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] ACE: Segfault in ACE_Malloc (resent)
Hi Lothar, > Hi, I resent this, as I got no response so far. That probably means that everyone one is too busy to look into this. > We have also sporadic crashes in ACE_Configuration, where > we try to load our configuration from a file with ACE_Registry_ImpExp. > > I recently had such a crash in the debugger and it crashes somewhere > in ACE_Malloc, too. > > Can anyone please run the attached program and tell me if I am > the only one that has problems here? If you can't figure out what's going wrong from running the debugger, you should probably contact Steve Huston <shuston@riverace.com> for help. Thanks, Doug ...

[ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] plugins and ACE configurator framework
Hi Francesco, >> C++NPv2 chapter 5 discusses the ACE Service Configurator Framework, >> and chapter 19 in APG has more tutorial information on the topic. Please see http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE/ for a website that contains links to more information on these books. Thanks, Doug >> Examples from these are in ACE_wrappers/examples/C++NPv2 and >> ACE_wrappers/examples/APG/Svc_Config, respectively. >> >> Best regards, >> >> -Steve >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation >> Co-author of "C++ Network Programming" and "The ACE Programmer's >> Guide" >> Books, ACE kit and support info at http://www.riverace.com/ >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu >> > [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Francesco >> Formenti >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 11:04 AM >> > To: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu >> > Subject: [ace-users] plugins and ACE...

[ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] How to Use IPv6 in ACE? #2
Please stop reposting this question. Bala and I have already answered it the past several days. Check out http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/4421 for my answer. Thanks, Doug >> ACE VERSION: 5.4.1 >> >> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: >> SUN Solaris 8 >> >> TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: >> COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): >> SUN Forte6 C++ UP1 >> >> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h [if you use a link to a platform- >> specific file, simply state which one]: >> config-sunos5.8.h >> >> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU (unless >> this isn't used in this case, e.g., with Microsoft Visual C++): >> platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU >> >> AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: >> NO >> >> DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT: >> COMPILATION? >> NO >> LINKING? >> NO >> EXECUTION? >> NO >> OTHER (please specify)? >> NO >> >> SYNOPSIS: >> I want to know how to use IPv6 in ACE-TAO, and where i can find the documents and examples. >> >> Thanks! >> ...

[tao-users] Re: [ace-users] How to use c++ native exception handling instead of ACE's while building ACE+TAO
Hi, >> My only guess is that all of the libs you are linking in your >> builds were not compiled with a consistent set of options. Right, my recommendation would be to completely blow away your existing ACE+TAO x.5 directory, download a fresh version, and start from a clean slate. It sounds like you may have things lying around from previous build attempts. Thanks, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt Professor and Associate Chair Electrical Engineering and Computer Science TEL: (615) 343-8197 Institute for Software Integrated Systems WEB: www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/~schmidt Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN, 37203 NET: d.schmidt@vanderbilt.edu ...

RE: [ace-users] Wither MSVC++ 6 support in ACE+TAO+CIAO #2
> From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu > [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas C. Schmidt > > So there will be no surprises, this is another reminder that > after the ACE+TAO+CIAO x.5 release (scheduled for later this summer or > early fall) the DOC group will no longer support MSVC++ 6. It's > simply too buggy and too out-of-date (e.g., wrt to template support) > for us to support anymore. Naturally, if you still need to use MSVC++ > 6 I recommend you contact one of the companies listed in > > http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/commercial-support.html > > and arrange for commercial support for MSVC++ 6. Thanks for the update Doug! Just to clarify Riverace's position, we do not plan to support ACE on MSVC 6 past ACE 5.5. We will support ACE 5.5 (and 5.4) on MSVC 6 for their defined support lifetime. The current list of the platforms Riverace supports, and the ACE versions of their support, are listed at http://www.riverace.com/support.htm If I can answer any questions about our supported platforms, please let me know. Best regards, -Steve -- Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation New! ACE Training - http://www.riverace.com/training.htm ACE book info at http://www.riverace.com/acebooks/ On Monday, 23 May 2005, Steve Huston wrote: >> From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu >> [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas C. >...

Re: [ace-users] [BULK] Re: [ace-bugs] [BULK] Re: Calling ACE::init() causes exception on 20th instantiation of a
Thanks to Aleksandar Vukajlovic at finsoft! He got us a bit closer to finding this issue and also came up with some much simpler test code that reproduces the issue (see below). It seems that ACE::fini is not properly cleaning up a thread or some storage. When config.h file is modified to include more thread keys (#define ACE_DEFAULT_THREAD_KEYS 1000), the issue occurs later on. The default value for ACE_DEFAULT_THREAD_KEYS is 64, with this, ACE::init will fail after ~20 iterations, with it increased to 1000, ACE::init fails ~500 iterations. Small program that will reproduce bug without using complex MFC follows from Aleksandar. Many thanks in advance for anyone who can help debug this. - Andrew //Test code #include "ace/OS.h" #include "ace/Log_Msg.h" #ifdef _DEBUG const char* dll_name = "U:\\Temp\\TestACEInit\\DllTest\\Debug\\DllTest.dll"; #else const char* dll_name = "U:\\Temp\\TestACEInit\\DllTest\\Release\\DllTest.dll"; #endif //_DEBUG void doTest () { for (int i = 0; i < 1000; ++i) { HMODULE hm = ::LoadLibrary (dll_name); if (hm == NULL) ACE_DEBUG ((LM_ERROR, "failed to load library, iteration (%d)\n", i)); if (::FreeLibrary (hm) == FALSE) ACE_DEBUG ((LM_ERROR, "failed to free library, iteration (%d)\n", i)); } } int main (int argc, char* argv[]) { doTest (); return 0; } ////////////////////////////////// // DllTest code...

[ace-bugs] RE: [ace-users] Building TAO on Linux RHEL 3.0 #2
Hi, > Well I updated from CVS on 12/05/2004 and now have a circular > dependency on the following: > > #error > "You should not include ObjectReferenceTemplateC.h directly, use > ObjectReferenceTemplate.h" Yes, that is an error that was there. > I will update again tomorrow evening... You guys must be > pushing for a release... The tip > of CVS breaks often on a push. Yes, we are working hard, but things break when having so many platforms and such a huge code base. At the moment we release things will be fine again. Johnny ...

[ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] Ace_Task Putq question for ACE gurus
Hi Kevin, To ensure that we have proper version/platform/compiler information, please make sure you fill out the appropriate problem report form (PRF), which is in $ACE_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $TAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM or in $ACE_ROOT/BUG-REPORT-FORM $TAO_ROOT/BUG-REPORT-FORM in older versions of ACE+TAO. Make sure to include this information when asking any questions about ACE+TAO since otherwise we have to "guess" what version/platform/compiler/options you've using, which is error-prone and slows down our responsiveness. >> I am trying to use the putq function in ace_task. >> >> I know it returns a -1 when putq fails to add >> Message_block to the queue. Why is it failing to do this, e.g., is the queue full or is something else going awry? >> I would like to know the actual error that is causing >> the failure.How do i get this error no. Depending on what you're doing (e.g., timed vs. blocking call), there may not be any special errno set (I think ETIME or ETIMEDOUT is set if a timeout occurs). I recommend you step into the ACE source code to see what's going on and let us know if a separate errno value would make any difference in how you handle the -1. Thanks, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt, Professor TEL: (615) 343-8197 Electrical Engineering and Computer Science FAX: (615) 343-7440 Vanderbilt University WEB: www...

Web resources about - [ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] ACE+TAO+CIAO - x.3.6 released - comp.soft-sys.ace

ACE+TAO+CIAO Sponsors
ACE+TAO+CIAO Sponsors The following companies, organizations, and funding agencies havesponsored our work on ACE , TAO , and CIAO over the pasttwo ...

Resources last updated: 3/22/2016 10:21:54 PM