f



[ace-users] Re: compile ACE+TAO.tar.bz2 (version 5.4.9) in Linux failed:

Hi,

        Please see
        
http://www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/scoreboard/

for a summary of the SUSE platforms that we support (which look like
SUSE 10).  I think think we have SUSE 9, so if you can send us patches
to fix the problem that would be great.

Thanks,

        Doug

>> ersion: 5.4.9
>> host: windows xp sp2, suse linux enterprise server 9 sp2
>> compiler: vs.net 2003, gcc 3.3.3
>> 
>> compile ACE+TAO.tar.bz2 error on SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 9 (while
>> on windows xp it's ok):
>> 
>> ../../ace/OS_NS_Thread.cpp: In function `int
>> ACE_OS::thr_get_affinity(long
>>    unsigned int, unsigned int, cpu_set_t*)':
>> ../../ace/OS_NS_Thread.cpp:5051: error: invalid conversion from
>> `cpu_set_t*' to
>>    `unsigned int'
>> /usr/include/sched.h:81: error: too few arguments to function `int
>>    sched_getaffinity(int, unsigned int, cpu_set_t*)'
>> ../../ace/OS_NS_Thread.cpp:5051: error: at this point in file
>> ../../ace/OS_NS_Thread.cpp: In function `int
>> ACE_OS::thr_set_affinity(long
>>    unsigned int, unsigned int, const cpu_set_t*)':
>> ../../ace/OS_NS_Thread.cpp:5097: error: invalid conversion from `const
>>    cpu_set_t*' to `unsigned int'
>> /usr/include/sched.h:77: error: too few arguments to function `int
>>    sched_setaffinity(int, unsigned int, const cpu_set_t*)'
>> ../../ace/OS_NS_Thread.cpp:5097: error: at this point in file
>> make[3]: *** [libACE_la-OS_NS_Thread.lo] Error 1
>> make[3]: Leaving directory `/mydata/ACE/ACE_wrappers/build/ace'
>> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>> make[2]: Leaving directory `/mydata/ACE/ACE_wrappers/build/ace'
>> make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/mydata/ACE/ACE_wrappers/build/ace'
>> make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>> 















-- 
Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt                       Professor and Associate Chair
Electrical Engineering and Computer Science  TEL: (615) 343-8197
Institute for Software Integrated Systems    WEB: www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/~schmidt
Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN, 37203   NET: d.schmidt@vanderbilt.edu

0
Douglas
2/15/2006 1:51:56 PM
comp.soft-sys.ace 20326 articles. 1 followers. marlow.andrew (167) is leader. Post Follow

0 Replies
550 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 20

Reply:

Similar Artilces:

RE: [ace-users] Re: compile ACE+TAO.tar.bz2 (version 5.4.9) in Linux failed:
Hi, This is a problem with the autoconf usage, there was a bug in that, please use the traditional way of building and please use the PRF form, then it would be clear on the first look that you did use autoconf. This will be fixed in the upcoming x.4.10 version. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl > Please see > > http://www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/scoreboard/ > > for a summary of the SUSE platforms that we support (which look like > SUSE 10). I think think we have SUSE 9, so if you can send us patches > to fix the problem that would be great. > > Thanks, > > Doug > > >> ersion: 5.4.9 > >> host: windows xp sp2, suse linux enterprise server 9 sp2 > >> compiler: vs.net 2003, gcc 3.3.3 > >> > >> compile ACE+TAO.tar.bz2 error on SuSE Linux Enterprise > Server 9 (while > >> on windows xp it's ok): > >> > >> ../../ace/OS_NS_Thread.cpp: In function `int > >> ACE_OS::thr_get_affinity(long > >> unsigned int, unsigned int, cpu_set_t*)': > >> ../../ace/OS_NS_Thread.cpp:5051: error: invalid conversion from > >> `cpu_set_t*' to > >> `unsigned int' > >> /usr/include/sched.h:81: error: too few arguments to function `int > >> sched...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86
Hi, >> ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 Thakns for using the PRF! >> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: >> Solaris10 X86 We (i.e., the DOC groups at UCI/VU/WU) don't have Solaris running on an x86 box (yet). It would therefore be great if you could figure out what patches need to be applied so that ACE compiles properly on this platform. BTW, Kitty/Bala, weren't we planning on running Solaris on an AMD box at some point? Thanks, Doug >> TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: >> COMPIL...

[ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86
Hi Jin, >> The solaris 9/10 for sparc is not the same as solaris 9/10 for >> Intel X86,although it is almost free,and the SunStudio 9 (CC >> 5.6)for sparc is not the same as SunStudio 9(CC 5.6) for Intel X86. This is yet one more reason why you'll need to do the legwork on this. Please let us know what you find out. Thanks, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt, Professor TEL: (615) 343-8197 Electrical Engineering and Computer Science FAX: (615) 343-7440 Vanderbilt University WEB: www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ Nashvil...

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi, > > Ok, the problem is in platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU, when a > not known forte > > version is found, it defaults to explicit. I am updating > right now, for 4.2 > > and 5.3 we default to explicit, for all others to implicit > > Is this necessary? I mean make it implicit by default. The > explicit is > not even supported, and has no chance to work cleanly. Why > should we patch > broken stuff. Just a thought? I have thought also about this, but maybe there are users around we don't know if. We can drop all this after x.5 is released, until that time, I just keep it there, just as we have a lot of other stuff that is probably broken. > > Qinghuajin and other Forte 9 users, you can work around > this by added the > > following line to your platform_macros.GNU file. > > templates = implicit > > This is until we release x.4.4., right? Yes, with x.4.4 this will be done correctly. Johnny ...

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi, > > > ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 > > > > > > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > > > Solaris10 X86 > > > TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: > > > COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): > > > Compiler: SUN CC 5.6 > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > I don't think the DOC group supports this compiler anymore.. More > particularly this compiler is buggy and you may land up with > unresolved > symbols even if you get past this pa...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi > > ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 > > > > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > > Solaris10 X86 > > TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: > > COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): > > Compiler: SUN CC 5.6 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I don't think the DOC group supports this compiler anymore.. More particularly this compiler is buggy and you may land up with unresolved symbols even if you get past this part. My $0.02. Thanks Bala > > Make: ...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi Jin, Thanks for using the PRF. >> ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 >> >> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: >> Solaris 10 x86 >> >> TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: >> COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): >> Sun Studio 9 (Sun CC 5.6) As we've mentioned several times now, we don't have this compiler installed yet on this hardware platform, so if you want things to be fixed soon I recommend you figure out what's going wrong and send us the patches. Otherwise, pl...

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
> Ok. Steve, could you maybe make clear with the build names > which builds use explicit templates? I'll try to get this clarified. > Explicit templates in TAO are known to be broken at this > moment. None of the tests at Riverace try to build TAO. -Steve ...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Johnny- > Ok, the problem is in platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU, when a not known forte > version is found, it defaults to explicit. I am updating right now, for 4.2 > and 5.3 we default to explicit, for all others to implicit Is this necessary? I mean make it implicit by default. The explicit is not even supported, and has no chance to work cleanly. Why should we patch broken stuff. Just a thought? > Qinghuajin and other Forte 9 users, you can work around this by added the > following line to your platform_macros.GNU file. > templates = implicit This is until w...

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi, > >> It's almost up. There are some issues with installing software as > >> we don't have the media in a compatible form yet. We also don't > >> have Sun CC, and we need to purchase a licence if we need to > >> support Sun CC. > > Ok, that's fine - thanks for the update. I think some other folks > (e.g., LMCO ATL and Remedy) have Solaris 9/10 and Sun CC, so we may > not need to worry about running Sun CC on our machine. Johnny/Gautam, > can you folks please confirm/deny whether you've got Sun CC on Solar...

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi Steve, > > Is this necessary? I mean make it implicit by default. The > > explicit is > > not even supported, and has no chance to work cleanly. Why > > should we patch > > broken stuff. Just a thought? > > At least for ACE 5.5, Riverace supports the Forte compiler that > requires explicit. After that, we can drop it. Ok. Steve, could you maybe make clear with the build names which builds use explicit templates? Explicit templates in TAO are known to be broken at this moment. Johnny ...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Johnny- > > > > ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 > > > > > > > > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > > > > Solaris10 X86 > > > > TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: > > > > COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): > > > > Compiler: SUN CC 5.6 > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > I don't think the DOC group supports this compiler anymore.. More > > particularly this compiler is buggy and you may land up with ...

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
> > Ok, the problem is in platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU, when a > not known forte > > version is found, it defaults to explicit. I am updating > right now, for 4.2 > > and 5.3 we default to explicit, for all others to implicit This sounds good. > Is this necessary? I mean make it implicit by default. The > explicit is > not even supported, and has no chance to work cleanly. Why > should we patch > broken stuff. Just a thought? At least for ACE 5.5, Riverace supports the Forte compiler that requires explicit. After that, we can drop it....

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi, > > > I don't think the DOC group supports this compiler anymore.. More > > > particularly this compiler is buggy and you may land up with > > > unresolved > > > symbols even if you get past this part. > > > > I missed the compiler version. But, Forte 8 gives output of > SUN C++ 5.5. Ok, the problem is in platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU, when a not known forte version is found, it defaults to explicit. I am updating right now, for 4.2 and 5.3 we default to explicit, for all others to implicit Qinghuajin and other Forte...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi Jin, >> I rebuild the ACE package according the instruction above,but get >> the same result. It doesn't look to me like you've added -DACE_HAS_X86_STAT_MACROS to the build-line as recommended by Johnny Willemsen. >> my platform_macros.GNU file has the following lines: >> >> templates = implicit >> include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU >> >> When i rebuild the ACE library,get the following compile errors: >> $ make inline=0 -j 2 -k -f GNUmakefile.ACE >> ... >&...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi Everyon: My SunBlade 150 is back up and available, and has a Sun CC license, though I don't have a lot of bandwidth to admin it. Bala know where it is and has the root password. I'll probably move it into the server room once I have a chance to talk to Dan about it, but I my be out of town this week. [dhinton@blade DRM]$ uname -a SunOS blade 5.9 Generic_112233-03 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-100 Solaris [dhinton@blade DRM]$ CC -V CC: Forte Developer 7 C++ 5.4 2002/03/09 [dhinton@blade DRM]$ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 3.4.2 Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, ...

compile ACE+TAO.tar.bz2 (version 5.4.9) in Linux failed:
ersion: 5.4.9 host: windows xp sp2, suse linux enterprise server 9 sp2 compiler: vs.net 2003, gcc 3.3.3 compile ACE+TAO.tar.bz2 error on SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 9 (while on windows xp it's ok): .../../ace/OS_NS_Thread.cpp: In function `int ACE_OS::thr_get_affinity(long unsigned int, unsigned int, cpu_set_t*)': .../../ace/OS_NS_Thread.cpp:5051: error: invalid conversion from `cpu_set_t*' to `unsigned int' /usr/include/sched.h:81: error: too few arguments to function `int sched_getaffinity(int, unsigned int, cpu_set_t*)' .../../ace/OS_NS_Thread.cpp:5051: error: at this point in file .../../ace/OS_NS_Thread.cpp: In function `int ACE_OS::thr_set_affinity(long unsigned int, unsigned int, const cpu_set_t*)': .../../ace/OS_NS_Thread.cpp:5097: error: invalid conversion from `const cpu_set_t*' to `unsigned int' /usr/include/sched.h:77: error: too few arguments to function `int sched_setaffinity(int, unsigned int, const cpu_set_t*)' .../../ace/OS_NS_Thread.cpp:5097: error: at this point in file make[3]: *** [libACE_la-OS_NS_Thread.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/mydata/ACE/ACE_wrappers/build/ace' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/mydata/ACE/ACE_wrappers/build/ace' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/mydata/ACE/ACE_wrappers/build/ace' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 ...

[ace-users] error of ACE-5.5.9.tar.gz or ACE-5.5.9.tar.bz2 file size
--0-461002240-1183106959=:96810 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi All : I found that ACE-5.5.9.tar.gz file size < ACE-5.5.9.tar.bz2 file size, Is it correctly? ACE-5.5.9.tar.bz2 - > 7.68 MB (8,061,560 bytes) ACE-5.5.9.tar.gz - > 7.31 MB (7,674,934 bytes) Regards --------------------------------- ��ע�Ż��������3.5G������20M������ --0-461002240-1183106959=:96810 Content-Type: text/html; charset=gb2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi All :<br><br>I found that ACE-5.5.9.tar.gz file size &lt; ACE-5.5.9.tar.bz2&nbsp; file size, Is it correctly?<br><br>ACE-5.5.9.tar.bz2 - &gt; 7.68 MB (8,061,560 bytes)<br>ACE-5.5.9.tar.gz&nbsp; - &gt;&nbsp; 7.31 MB (7,674,934 bytes)<br><br>Regards<br><br><br><p>&#32; <hr size=1><a href="http://cn.mail.yahoo.com" target=blank>��ע�Ż��������3.5G������20M������</a> --0-461002240-1183106959=:96810-- Hi, >I found that ACE-5.5.9.tar.gz file size < ACE-5.5.9.tar.bz2 file size, Is it correctly? > >ACE-5.5.9.tar.bz2 - > 7.68 MB (8,061,560 bytes) >ACE-5.5.9.tar.gz - > 7.31 MB (7,674,934 bytes) Why does it matter? Are the contents the same? Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt Professor and Associate Chair Electrical Engineering and Computer Science TEL: (615) 343-8197 Va...

[ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86
Hi,all ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: Solaris10 X86 TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): Compiler: SUN CC 5.6 Make: GNU make 3.80 CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h [if you use a link to a platform- specific file, simply state which one]: #include "ace/config-sunos5.9.h" CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU (unless this isn't used in this case, e.g., with Microsoft ...

RE: [tao-users] RE: [ace-users] XML service configuration no longer works with ACE/TAO 5.4.5/1.4.5
Hi, > > Hi Lothar > > > > > � � ACE VERSION: 5.4.5 > > > > Thanks for using the PRF form. Could you try to find the > problem and send > > us patches to fix this? > > > > Regards, > > > > Johnny Willemsen > > I have no problem committing some time to the problem. I do > however know as > much as nothing about the ACE XML parser and it's recent > changes. It seems to > me that (some) of the recent changes might have caused the > test failures. So > if someone working actively on ACEXML gives me directions I > am willing to > spend my time investigating the problem. I can't remember that work has been done the last months so I am also amazed things broke. Nobody is actively working on it, so I think there are not much directions at this moment. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl On Wednesday 18 May 2005 11:01, Johnny Willemsen wrote: > Hi, > I can't remember that work has been done the last months so I am also > amazed things broke. Nobody is actively working on it, so I think there are > not much directions at this moment. Well, it did definiteley work with 5.4.4. So any changes that broke it must have been made between 5.4.4 and 5.4.5. I also read in the release email of 5.4.5 in the CIAO...

[ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi,all I rebuild the ACE package according the instruction above,but get the same result. my platform_macros.GNU file has the following lines: templates = implicit include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU When i rebuild the ACE library,get the following compile errors: $ make inline=0 -j 2 -k -f GNUmakefile.ACE .... .... CC -mt -g -DSUN_CC_HAS_PVFC_BUG -I/export/home/hua/DevTools/ACE_wrappers -DACE_HAS_EXCEPTIONS -DACE_NO_INLINE -I.. -DACE_HAS_ACE_TOKEN -DACE_HAS_ACE_SVCCONF -DACE_BUILD_DLL -c -KPIC -o .shobj/OS_NS_sys_stat.o OS_NS_sys_...

[ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi, ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: Solaris 10 x86 TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): Sun Studio 9 (Sun CC 5.6) CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h [if you use a link to a platform- specific file, simply state which one]: #define ACE_HAS_STANDARD_CPP_LIBRARY 1 #define ACE_USES_STD_NAMESPACE_FOR_STDCPP_LIB 1 #include "ace/config-sunos5.9.h" CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU (unless ...

RE: [tao-users] Re: [ace-users] Re: Announcing the release of the new beta (ACE-5.4.10, TAO-1.4.10 and CIAO-0.4.10)
Hi, > > >> We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your > > >> applications, and let us know soon if you encounter any problems > > >> since we plan to cut the x.5 release by February 28th. > > > > As per Wallace's comments, we have an aggressive schedule > for the x.5 > > release to meet the needs of some major sponsors. If > people can give > > x.4.10 a "test drive" in the next couple of days and report problems > > they encounter we'll try to ensure that we fix any > showstoppers before > > According to bugzilla bug 2323 is not fixed yet. > > http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2323 > > For us it is a show stopper. We use the OCI version which does not > have problems related to this bug but it would be nice to be able to > use the latest version with more fixes. FYI, the reason that this test now fails is because Ossama added several new test cases which wheren't in the test in the past, this uncovered some bugs which according to our information where already there a long time. Johnny "Johnny Willemsen" <jwillemsen@remedy.nl> writes: > > > >> We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your > > > >> applications, and let us know soon if you encounter any problems > > > >> sinc...

[tao-users] RE: [ace-users] XML service configuration no longer works with ACE/TAO 5.4.5/1.4.5
Hi Lothar > � � ACE VERSION: 5.4.5 Thanks for using the PRF form. Could you try to find the problem and send us patches to fix this? Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl > > � � HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > uname -a > Linux janus 2.6.11.4-20a-default #1 Wed Mar 23 21:52:37 UTC > 2005 x86_64 x86_64 > x86_64 GNU/Linux > > � � TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: > � � COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): > gcc-4.0.0 --version > gcc-4.0.0 (GCC) 4.0.0 > > � � CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h [if you use a link to > a platform- > � � specific file, simply state which one]: > cat /opt2/linux/x86_64/ACE/1.4.4/ACE_wrappers/ace/config.h > #define ACE_HAS_XML_SVC_CONF > #include "ace/config-linux.h" > > � � CONTENTS OF > $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU (unless > � � this isn't used in this case, e.g., with Microsoft Visual C++): > cat > /opt2/linux/x86_64/ACE/1.4.4/ACE_wrappers/include/makeinclude/ > platform_macros.GNU > > # configure ACE/TAO for our use > > debug=1 > optimize=1 > exceptions=1 > threads=1 > inline=1 > rtti=1 > versioned_so=1 > interface_repo=1 > ssl=1 > > include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_linux.GNU ...

Web resources about - [ace-users] Re: compile ACE+TAO.tar.bz2 (version 5.4.9) in Linux failed: - comp.soft-sys.ace

Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 User Reviews
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 reviews written by Phone Arena users. You can read the opinion of each user and how they rate the phone in 11 categories. ...

Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 official: iPhone-alike size for the new user
Samsung has revealed another in its Galaxy series, the Galaxy Ace 3, now targeting entry-level smartphone users who want a pocket-friendly 4-inch ...

Resources last updated: 3/5/2016 9:41:17 AM