f



[ace-users] Re: How can I use ACE(Latest Beta Kit) for AIX version 5.3/5.2 and VisualAge C++ 7.0/6.0 for AIX on machine IBM P690? \

Hi Oliana,

Thanks very much for your email.  Please make sure to send all
questions related to TAO or ACE to the ACE mailing list or ACE+TAO
newsgroup, rather than to me directly since I travel frequently and
often don't have ready access to email.  See

http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE-mail.html

for more info on how to access these resources.

> I want to use ACE.tar.bz2(Latest Beta Kit) on AIX version 5.3,Now
> I'm writing application program base on ACE.tar.bz2 (Latest Beta
> Kit) and testing ACE.tar.bz2(Latest Beta Kit) on AIX version 5.2 for
> IBM P690 and using VisualAge C++ 6.0 and VisualAge C++ 7.0,It?s very
> strange ,the ACE.tar.bz2 was compiled successful,But the application
> program can?t be compiled success,There are a lot of problems.It has
> reported a lot of mistakes of STL head file in VisualAge ,and then
> It told me there are something wrong in VisualAge C++ 6.0/7.0's head
> file.I don't know why,Then ,I written testing code ,only have tested
> VisualAge C++ 6.0 and VisualAge C++ 7.0 for AIX version 5.2's head
> file already,the compiler was compiling and running up to snuff,no
> mistake in head file.And you know ,When I put the same application
> program and ACE.tar.bz2(Latest Beta Kit) in Redhatlinux for PC and
> Turbo linux for IBM eServe BladeCenter, there are no mistakes,and
> It?s normally compiling and running so fast.So,I don?t know why,what
> happening for my machine or my program.Please help me!

Please note that the DOC groups at Washington University, UC Irvine,
and Vanderbilt University do not have access to AIX.  Thus, if you
need more "predictable" help, I recommend that you check out

http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/commercial-support.html

for a list of companies that will provide you with ACE+TAO commercial
support.

Thanks very much,

        Doug

0
Douglas
10/14/2005 1:00:06 PM
comp.soft-sys.ace 20326 articles. 1 followers. marlow.andrew (167) is leader. Post Follow

0 Replies
2643 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 9

Reply:

Similar Artilces:

RE: [ace-users] ACE 5.3
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01BC_01C5D46D.2EF26B10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Praveen, =20 Riverace will have an AIX 5.3/Visual Age 7 machine running next week. We have a sponsor for porting ACE 5.4 to the platform. If you'd like to sponsor us porting back to ACE 5.3, please let me know. =20 Best regards, =20 -Steve -- Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation "How to Use ACE Effectively" class Oct 17-19! See http://www.riverace.com/training.htm -----Original Message----- From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Praveen Kumar Gulati Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 3:08 AM To: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu Subject: [ace-users] ACE 5.3 - TAO 1.3 on AIX 5.3 with compiler Visual Age Version 7.0 Hi I am trying to build ACE 5.3 - TAO 1.3 on AIX 5.3 with compiler Visual Age Version 7.0. Do you already know some issues in above combination?=20 Whether some one is already using above combination? Regards Praveen Gulati ------=_NextPart_000_01BC_01C5D46D.2EF26B10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; = charset=3Dus-ascii&q...

RE: [ace-users] ACE 5.3
Hi, 5.3 is ancient, visual age 7 is brand new, I don't think anyone is using this and you problaby will find issues because this is not tested. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu > [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Praveen > Kumar Gulati > Sent: woensdag 19 oktober 2005 9:08 > To: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: [ace-users] ACE 5.3 - TAO 1.3 on AIX 5.3 with > compiler Visual Age Version 7.0 > > Hi > > I am trying to build ACE 5.3 - TAO 1.3 on AIX 5.3 with > compiler Visual Age Version 7.0. > > Do you already know some issues in above combination? > > Whether some one is already using above combination? > > Regards > > Praveen Gulati > > ...

[ace-users] ACE 5.3
------=_Part_17_4772698.1129705681813 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi I am trying to build ACE 5.3 - TAO 1.3 on AIX 5.3 with compiler Visual Age Version 7.0. Do you already know some issues in above combination? Whether some one is already using above combination? Regards Praveen Gulati ------=_Part_17_4772698.1129705681813 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline <font size=3D"2"> <p>Hi</p> <p>I am trying to build ACE 5.3 - TAO 1.3 on AIX 5.3 with compiler Visual A= ge Version 7.0.</p> <p>Do you already know some issues in above combination? </p> <p>Whether some one is already using above combination?</p> <p>Regards</p> <p>Praveen Gulati</p></font> ------=_Part_17_4772698.1129705681813-- ------=_Part_209_12524537.1129714684175 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi Thanks. I will come back to you after some time. I have already built with some minor changes. ACE is only a small component in my application, which is currently runnin= g in Solaris. I am in process of porting other components to AIX, after that I will brin= g up the application, if there are any issues, I will fall ba...

Re: [ace-users] Errors while compiling c++ 3.4.2
Hi Eyal, I believe we've fixed these problems in the latest version of ACE that's tucked inside our CVS repository. Can you please take a look at this version available in http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html and see if things work better. If not, please let us know so we can fix them before we release ACE 5.4.3 in a week or so. Thanks, Doug >> I get the following while compiling: >> >> /usr/bin/c++ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199506L -DNDEBUG -DUSING_GCC >> -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -DLINUX -I../inc >> -I../3rd_party...

Re: [tao-users] ACE 5.3.5 + TAO 1.3.5 + CIAO 0.3.5 beta released #2 #2
Hi Alex, > What are OCI's plan's for a supported TAO 1.4 release and developer > guide? Will this effect the release of the 1.3 guide? This is an excellent question - I'm sure Malcolm Spence will pitch in when he has a chance and I suspect that OCI will be supporting TAO 1.4 in due time. None of the changes in TAO 1.4 should affect the relevance of the info in the TAO 1.3 developer's guide - there's just more new stuff to document as time permits. Take care, Doug ...

[ace-users] Errors while compiling c++ 3.4.2
I get the following while compiling: /usr/bin/c++ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199506L -DNDEBUG -DUSING_GCC -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -DLINUX -I../inc -I../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers -fPIC -pedantic -fno-for-scope -Wno-long-long -Wno-deprecated -o Trace.o.linux -c Trace.cpp In file included from .../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers/ace/Unbounded_Set.h:306, from ../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers/ace/Memory_Pool.h:30, from ../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers/ace/Malloc.h:414, from ../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers/ace/String_Base....

Re: [ace-users] [ACE 5.5] Upgrade from ACE 5.4.7 to ACE 5.5 #2
Hi Ishay, >> Sorry, we are using DevStudio 7.1 (2003) We use this too. Please see ACE_ROOT/tests/Time_Value_Test.cpp for lots of examples that use ACE_Time_Value with integers. Please see if this works on your OS/compiler platform. Thanks, Doug >> ~ Ishay >> >> Software Architect >> Onigma Ltd. >> Tel: +972-3-6877315 >> Fax: +972-3-6877128 >> Mobile: +972-54-2325090 >> Email: ishay@onigma.com >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Johnny Willemsen [mailto:jwillemsen@remedy.nl] >> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 2:42 PM >> To: 'Ishay Green'; ace-users@cs.wustl.edu >> Subject: RE: [ace-users] [ACE 5.5] Upgrade from ACE 5.4.7 to ACE 5.5 >> >> Hi, >> >> > ACE VERSION: 5.5 >> >> Thanks for using the PRF form. >> >> > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: >> > >> > Intel, WindowsXp, Windows 2003 >> >> An important bit information is missing, which compiler did you use. >> >> > AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: >> > The only problem we encountered was a compilation error >> > when construction ACE_Time_Value. >> > >> > The ACE_Time_Value cannot be constructed anymore from an integer. >> > >> > For example: ACE_Time_Value( 5 ) --> Compile error >>...

RE: [ace-users] [ACE 5.5] Upgrade from ACE 5.4.7 to ACE 5.5 #2
Hi, Sorry, we are using DevStudio 7.1 (2003) ~ Ishay Software Architect Onigma Ltd. Tel: +972-3-6877315 Fax: +972-3-6877128 Mobile: +972-54-2325090 Email: ishay@onigma.com -----Original Message----- From: Johnny Willemsen [mailto:jwillemsen@remedy.nl] Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 2:42 PM To: 'Ishay Green'; ace-users@cs.wustl.edu Subject: RE: [ace-users] [ACE 5.5] Upgrade from ACE 5.4.7 to ACE 5.5 Hi, > ACE VERSION: 5.5 Thanks for using the PRF form. > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > > Intel, WindowsXp, Windows 2003 An important bit information is missing, which compiler did you use. > AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: > The only problem we encountered was a compilation error > when construction ACE_Time_Value. > > The ACE_Time_Value cannot be constructed anymore from an integer. > > For example: ACE_Time_Value( 5 ) --> Compile error Great to hear things work without problems. This errors sounds strange, we do have test cases like this in tests/Time_Value_Test.cpp. We do have made all constructors of ACE_Time_Value explicit. As a result if you have a method that expects a ACE_Time_Value&, you just can't pass for example 5, you have to pass an ACE_Time_Value(5). Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl ...

Re: [ace-bugs] Compilation error on SUSE 8.0, gcc 2.95.3 with ace 5.3.0 and latest version
Hi, Thanks for using the PRF. We build daily with SuSE 8.2 and GCC 3.3 and don't have problems. Try to set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to a full path for a test. I think you have to search the problem in the export of ACE_ROOT and LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT BV Leeghwaterstraat 25 2811 DT Reeuwijk The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl <jahb@lineone.net> wrote in message news:<3F216AC2000202DE@mk-cpfrontend-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com>... > ACE VERSION: > > 5.3.0 (and latest beta version) > > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: &g...

Re: [tao-users] ACE 5.3.5 + TAO 1.3.5 + CIAO 0.3.5 beta released #2
Hi Tom, > We are currently arm-wrestling with TAO-1.3.3 on VxWorks-5.5/Tornado-2.2 > built with non-native exceptions and with implicit templates. Implicit > templates are desirable since we are now using STL and those nested > templates make explicit instantiation almost impossible. Non-native > exceptions are important since native exceptions lead to a factor of 4.5 > increase in code size (!!). > > Implicit templates cause trouble with singletons, since the VxWorks-2.x > loader does not respect weakly-defined symbols, so one can not load > multiple mo...

RE: [ace-users] [ACE 5.5] Upgrade from ACE 5.4.7 to ACE 5.5
Hi, > ACE VERSION: 5.5 Thanks for using the PRF form. > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > > Intel, WindowsXp, Windows 2003 An important bit information is missing, which compiler did you use. > AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: > The only problem we encountered was a compilation error > when construction ACE_Time_Value. > > The ACE_Time_Value cannot be constructed anymore from an integer. > > For example: ACE_Time_Value( 5 ) --> Compile error Great to hear things work without problems. This errors sounds strange, we do have test cases like this in tests/Time_Value_Test.cpp. We do have made all constructors of ACE_Time_Value explicit. As a result if you have a method that expects a ACE_Time_Value&, you just can't pass for example 5, you have to pass an ACE_Time_Value(5). Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl ...

[ace-bugs] Compilation error on SUSE 8.0, gcc 2.95.3 with ace 5.3.0 and latest version
ACE VERSION: 5.3.0 (and latest beta version) HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: SUSE linux 8.0 If on Windows based OS's, which version of WINSOCK do you use?:n/a TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): gcc 2.95.3 GNU make 3.79.1 CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h: config-linux.h CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU (unless this isn't used in this case, e.g., with Microsoft Visual C++): platform_linux.GNU AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: [W...

RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3) #2
Hi J.T., Right... The issue is a bit odd... Here's the check I added for ACE: dnl This check was added to work around a system-supplied header dnl (/usr/include/netinet/ip.h) that won't compile with Visual Age C++ dnl unless the _NO_BITFIELDS preprocessor macro is defined. The comments dnl there recommend use of _NO_BITFIELDS (and recode where needed to allow dnl that), but we won't just turn it on. Check to see if it's needed. Note dnl that this check is related to headers but done before we really know if dnl the header is present. Thus, if the bare compile fails, but succeeds dnl with _NO_BITFIELDS, set the flag, else leave things alone. -Steve -- Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation Adding Service to Open Source Software ACE book info at http://www.riverace.com/acebooks/ > -----Original Message----- > From: J.T. Conklin [mailto:jtc@acorntoolworks.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 2:21 PM > To: Colm McHugh > Cc: Steve Huston; ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: Re: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after > GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3) > > > Colm McHugh <cmchugh@callixa.com> writes: > >>Sure... Why do you say <sys/machine.h> is a prerequisite for > >><netinet/tcp.h>? I addressed a problem related to this in > the autoconf > >>support for AIX that'll go in the next beta, but it doesn't involve...

RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3) #2
Hi Colm, Ok, thanks for that explanation. I solved this a different way for a similar problem that showed up with Visual Age C++ on AIX 5.2... When the 5.4.5 beta comes out, please try this again and hopefully no further workarounds will be needed. Thanks, -Steve -- Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation Adding Service to Open Source Software ACE book info at http://www.riverace.com/acebooks/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Colm McHugh [mailto:cmchugh@callixa.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 1:05 PM > To: Steve Huston > Cc: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: Re: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after > GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3) > > > > >Sure... Why do you say <sys/machine.h> is a prerequisite for > ><netinet/tcp.h>? I addressed a problem related to this in > the autoconf > >support for AIX that'll go in the next beta, but it doesn't involve > >machine.h. > > > Hi Steve, > > that statement is based on the compilation sequence shown > below (done on > an AIX 5.2): > > $ cat t2.cpp > #include <sys/machine.h> > #include <netinet/tcp.h> > int main() > {} > $ g++ t2.cpp > $ cat t1.cpp > #include <netinet/tcp.h> > int main() > {} > $ g++ t1.cpp > In file incl...

Re: [tao-users] ACE 5.3.5 + TAO 1.3.5 + CIAO 0.3.5 beta released
Hi Folks, It's been about a year since we released ACE 5.3 and TAO 1.3. We are therefore planning to release ACE 5.4 and TAO 1.4 by mid-December. The ACE+TAO x.3.5 beta that Venkita just announced will be the penultimate beta towards that goal. In addition to all the enhancements that he mentioned in the release notes, we also plan to add the following enhancements before the x.4 release: ---------------------------------------- .. ACE subsetting enhancements .. ORB footprint and compilation-time enhancements .. CORBA Security Service capabilities .. Load Balancing Servi...

[ace-users] ACE+TAO+CIAO
Hi all, We are pleased to announce the latest ACE+TAO+CIAO beta. This beta has been tagged ACE+TAO+CIAO-5_5_6. The main difference between this release and x.5.5 is that the ACE exception macros (except for ACE_THROW_RETURN and ACE_THROW_SPEC) have been removed from all TAO and CIAO code. It is available from the same download location as per the previous release. http://download.dre.vanderbilt.edu/ The doxygen documentation for the beta is also available. Included with this beta, besides the packages combined of sources and generate makefiles, we also provide source only packages for the group of users which use MPC to generate their own makefiles. We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your applications, and let us know if you encounter any problems. Please use the: $ACE_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $TAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $CIAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM so that we have the proper version/platform/compiler/options you're using to report problems. We also request that you take a look at: $TAO_ROOT/docs/releasenotes/ for the status of various ongoing projects at the DOC groups of WashU, UCI, and Vanderbilt to move ACE+TAO+CIAO forward. Overviews of our recent progress and upcoming plans are available at: $ACE_ROOT/NEWS $TAO_ROOT/NEWS $CIAO_ROOT/NEWS The overall success rates for the test results gathered from all our daily builds is 96% for the ACE tests and 92% for the TAO tests. Please see: http://ww...

[tao-users] Use of TAO_OutputCDR and ACE_Message_Block in CORBA::Any from TAO 1.4.1|ACE 5.4.1 to TAO2.2.0|ACE 6.2.0
This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00BF_01CEA8D4.9E005C80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable TAO VERSION: 2.2.0 ACE VERSION: 6.2.0 =20 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: x86_64 and Red Hat - Linux 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 =20 TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: =20 COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): gcc (GCC) 4.8.1 =20 THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h FILE: config-linux.h =20 THE $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU FILE: platform_linux.GNU =20 CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/bin/MakeProjectCreator/config/default.features (used by MPC when you generate your own makefiles): =20 AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: TAO_OutputCDR and ACE_Message_Block. =20 DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT: EXECUTION. My application is affected. =20 SYNOPSIS: The code that extract data from CORBA::Any using TAO_OutputCDR and ACE_Message_Block for user defined types works properly in the old platform (TAO 1.4.1|ACE 5.4.1), but not in the new one(ACE 6.2.0). =20 DESCRIPTION: The code in the =93REPEAT BY=94 section works fine in the old platform = for user defined types, that is, the TAO_OutputCDR and ACE_Message_Block objects have the same length, but in the new platform th...

[ace-users] [ACE 5.5] Upgrade from ACE 5.4.7 to ACE 5.5
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_ogLNJ2XjtOnI/qoGYuqYNQ) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT ACE VERSION: 5.5 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: Intel, WindowsXp, Windows 2003 AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: Our team has upgraded from ACE 5.4.7 to ACE 5.5. I am submitting this email as a service for the ace members that considure upgrading to ACE 5.5 and using the same platform and features we are using from the ACE Frameworks library. After running a regression test the upgrade seemed to work without any problems. The only problem we encountered was a compilation error when construction ACE_Time_Value. The ACE_Time_Value cannot be constructed anymore from an integer. For example: ACE_Time_Value( 5 ) --> Compile error DESCRIPTION: We are using ACE_WIN32_Proactor with sockets, pipes and directory changes. BOTTOM LINE: If you are an ace user who are using the same platform and architecture you could upgrade to the new framework knowing that somewhere in the world (Israel/Onigma) the upgrade worked perfectly and nightly. ~ Ishay Software Architect Onigma Ltd. Tel: +972-3-6877315 Fax: +972-3-6877128 Mobile: +972-54-2325090 Email: ishay@onigma.com --Boundary_(ID_ogLNJ2XjtOnI/qoGYuqYNQ) Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BI...

[ace-users] ACE 6.2.0/6.2.2 bult with XL C/C++ v 12.1 on AIX71 or XL C/C++ v 9.0 on AIX61
--_000_80317163A516B94B988E1615F9FAFB1989DFE22Cotwlxg22opentex_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: ace-bugs@list.isis.vanderbilt.edu<mailto:ace-bugs@list.isis.vanderbilt.= edu>; ace-users@list.isis.vanderbilt.edu<mailto:ace-users@list.isis.vanderb= ilt.edu>; Subject: [area]: [synopsis] ACE VERSION: 6.2.2 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: AIX71 TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h FILE [if you use a link to a platform- specific file, simply state which one]: config.h -> config-aix-7.h THE $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU FILE [if you use a link to a platform-specific file, simply state which one (unless this isn't used in this case, e.g., with Microsoft Visual C++)]: platform_aix_ibm.GNU CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/bin/MakeProjectCreator/config/default.features (used by MPC when you generate your own makefiles): AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT: COMPILATION? NO LINKING? YES/NO On Unix systems, did you run make realclean first? YES EXECUTION? YES OTHER (please specify)? [Please indicate whether ACE, your application, or both are affected.] SYNOPSIS: Numerous symbols searched for by an application are not foun...

[ace-users] Can't use ACE-5.5.1 in Mingw in gcc-4.2.0 in Windows XP
--0-494066084-1180346950=:84152 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit HI all : I have built ACE-5.5.1 in mingw using gcc-3.4.5 , but when I use it in gcc-4.2.0, it occur error. If you don't have gcc-4.2.0 in Mingw32 in Windows XP, you can download from : http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-install http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=148008 ACE VERSION: 5.5.1 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): $ uname -a MINGW32_NT-5.1 CH-SZX-HBZHANG1 1.0.11(0.46/3/2) 2007-01-12 12:05 i686 Msys $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: mingw32 Configured with: ../../gcc-4.2.0/configure --with-gcc --with-gnu-ld --with-gnu-as --host=mingw32 --target=mingw32 --prefix=/m ingw --enable-threads --disable-nls --enable-languages=c,c++,objc --disable-win32-registry --disable-shared Thread model: win32 gcc version 4.2.0 The error is : =========================================== Making all in src make[2]: Entering directory `/e/zhb_svn/mingw/build/hbstock_build/src' /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../../../hbstock/src -Wall -D_MINGW32_ -D_WIN32 _ -I/opt/ace/include -I../../../hbstock/include -O2 -MT libhbstock2_la-i18n_debug.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libhbstock2_la-i18n_d ebug.Tpo -c -o libhbstock2_la-i18n_debug.lo `test -f 'i18n_debug.cpp' || echo &...

[ace-users] Tests failed : ACE 5.5.2 - AIX 5.3
Hi, My first mail before my message in the group failed (my subscription was not activated). The PRF below describes my problems. I can compile and link but several ACE's tests fail. I only use ACE library and only compile it by cd'ing in the ace directory before running make. I already made some fixes described below to compile and to link the library. I'm not abble to interpret the faild tests to identify the problem source or area. I didn't find the scoreboard before my mail. I see that several tests fails for all compilations on AIX. I try to reassure myself by looking these results, it's not only for my configuration. But it's a daily build with last development version. For the 5.5.2 stable version they should probably not fail ? Regards, PO Houot. ACE VERSION: 5.5.2 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: bash-3.00$ uname -a AIX localhost 3 5 0040983B4C00 unknown unknown AIX bash-3.00$ oslevel -r 5300-05 TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: Same as host COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): bash-3.00$ g++ -v Using built-in specs. Target: powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0 Configured with: ../gcc-4.1.1/configure --disable-nls Thread model: aix gcc version 4.1.1 This compiler is installed from packages provided by UCLA AIX Software library THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h FILE : bash-3.00$ more $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h #include "ace/config-aix-5.x.h" T...

Re: [ace-users] C2733 error when using ACE-5.5.8 + TProactor to build realse version app, but 5.5.7 is OK. Maybe a bug
Hi, Please use the original PRF in the future. I think this is solved in the upcoming x.5.9 version Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl *** Integrated compile and test statistics see http://scoreboard.theaceorb.nl *** *** Commercial service and support for ACE/TAO/CIAO *** *** See http://www.theaceorb.nl/en/support.html *** <hongxing777@gmail.com> wrote in message news:<1182424516.315329.272880@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com>... > Version: 5.5.8 > host: windows xp sp2, suse linux enterprise server 9 sp2 > compiler: vs.net 2003, gcc 3.3.3 > > I integrated TProactor into ACE-5.5.8 and build my app based on it. My > app runs stable in debug version. But when I switched to release > version, the compiler reports the following error: > D:\hongxing\component\ACE_wrappers\ace\os_include\os_intrin.h(48) : > error C2733: second C linkage of overloaded function > "_InterlockedExchange" D:\hongxing\component\ACE_wrappers\ace > \os_include\os_intrin.h(49) : error C2733: second C linkage of > overloaded function "_InterlockedExchangeAdd" > > when I switched back to ACE-5.5.7, everything is ok. > I found in the ACE-5.5.8 $ACE_ROOT\ace\os_include dir, there are two > additional files os_byteswap.h and os_intrin.h (compared to > ACE-5.5.7). And ther...

RE: [ace-users] Re: what version tao/ace for AIX 5.2 posix aio
Hi Duane, I can't speak for TAO's use of AIO, but ACE 5.4 does support AIO on AIX 5.2. -Steve -- Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation Co-author of "C++ Network Programming" and "The ACE Programmer's Guide" Books, ACE kit and support info at http://www.riverace.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu > [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas C. Schmidt > Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2004 2:49 PM > To: shuston@riverace.com; ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: [ace-user...

[ace-users] Re: Can't build ACE on AIX 5.2 #2
Hi Duane, Since you're using the OCI version of ACE+TAO please send your questions to taosupport@ociweb.com. Thanks, doug >> I have ACE 5.3a-OCI and TAO 1.3a-OCI which was running fine on AIX >> 5.1. My sysadmin updated to OS to AIX 5.2. I had link errors in my >> app and so decided to rebuild ACE and TAO. Now I can't build ACE. >> I've got a compile error. >> >> xlC_r -qflag=w:w -qstaticinline -qfuncsect -qtempinc >> -qsuppress=1540-1102:1500-010:1501-201:1540-198 -g -DACE_LACKS_RTTI -g >> qch...

Web resources about - [ace-users] Re: How can I use ACE(Latest Beta Kit) for AIX version 5.3/5.2 and VisualAge C++ 7.0/6.0 for AIX on machine IBM P690? \ - comp.soft-sys.ace

Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 User Reviews
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 reviews written by Phone Arena users. You can read the opinion of each user and how they rate the phone in 11 categories. ...

Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 official: iPhone-alike size for the new user
Samsung has revealed another in its Galaxy series, the Galaxy Ace 3, now targeting entry-level smartphone users who want a pocket-friendly 4-inch ...

Resources last updated: 3/5/2016 12:23:54 PM