f



[ace-users] segfault on linux x86-64 with ACE/TAO 5.4.4/1.4.4

    ACE VERSION: 5.4.4

    HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM:
uname -a
Linux janus 2.6.11.4-20a-default #1 Wed Mar 23 21:52:37 UTC 2005 x86_64 x86_64 
x86_64 GNU/Linux

    TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST:
    COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL):
gcc-4.0.0 --version
gcc-4.0.0 (GCC) 4.0.0

    CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h [if you use a link to a platform-
    specific file, simply state which one]:
cat /opt2/linux/x86_64/ACE/1.4.4/ACE_wrappers/ace/config.h
#define ACE_HAS_XML_SVC_CONF
#include "ace/config-linux.h"

    CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU (unless
    this isn't used in this case, e.g., with Microsoft Visual C++):
cat /opt2/linux/x86_64/ACE/1.4.4/ACE_wrappers/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU

# configure ACE/TAO for our use

debug=1
optimize=1
exceptions=1
threads=1
inline=1
rtti=1
versioned_so=1
interface_repo=1
ssl=1

include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_linux.GNU

# Disable the RCSID for release/non-debug builds.
CPPFLAGS += -DACE_USE_RCSID=0

# enable 64 bit build
CPPFLAGS += -m64
# enable 32 bit build
#CPPFLAGS += -m32

CC=/opt2/linux/x86_64/bin/gcc-4.0.0
CXX=/opt2/linux/x86_64/bin/g++-4.0.0

TAO_IDL_PREPROCESSOR=${CC}

    CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/bin/MakeProjectCreator/config/default.features
    (used by MPC when you generate your own makefiles):

    AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED:
application / unit tests

    DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT:
        COMPILATION?
no
        LINKING?
no
        EXECUTION?
yes, segmentation fault.
        OTHER (please specify)?
no

    SYNOPSIS:
segfault on linux x86-64

    DESCRIPTION:
We have two builds (32bit and 64bit) both use the same compiler (as the x86-64 
compiler is multilib) just with a different compileflag -m32 vs. -m64. You 
can see that in the platform_macros.GNU as well.

our unit tests fail with the 64 bit build. If we run the 32 bit build it 
works. Here's a GDB backtrace:

#0  0x00002aaaae794923 in strcmp () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
(gdb) where
#0  0x00002aaaae794923 in strcmp () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
#1  0x00002aaaabbfd1a9 in ACE_OS::strcmp (s=0x0, t=0x2aaaabc1f7e4 "Balances")
    at OS_NS_string.inl:112
#2  0x00002aaaabbffcd2 in 
ACE_Malloc_T<xcerla::xrs::BalanceManagerMemory::MemoryPool, ACE_Null_Mutex, 
ACE_Control_Block>::shared_find (this=0x5a3178,
    name=0x2aaaabc1f7e4 "Balances") at Malloc_T.cpp:659
#3  0x00002aaaabbffd56 in 
ACE_Malloc_T<xcerla::xrs::BalanceManagerMemory::MemoryPool, ACE_Null_Mutex, 
ACE_Control_Block>::find (this=0x5a3178,
    name=0x2aaaabc1f7e4 "Balances", pointer=@0x7fffffffcdc8)
    at Malloc_T.cpp:741
#4  0x00002aaaabbffdaf in 
ACE_Allocator_Adapter<ACE_Malloc<xcerla::xrs::BalanceManagerMemory::MemoryPool, 
ACE_Null_Mutex> >::find (this=0x5a3170,
    name=0x2aaaabc1f7e4 "Balances", pointer=@0x7fffffffcdc8)
    at Malloc_T.inl:189
#5  0x00002aaaabbf6c70 in BalanceManagerMemory (this=0x7fffffffd6e0,
    rc_fileName=@0x2aaaabeab660, rc_backupFileName=@0x7fffffffdfa0)
    at BalanceManagerMemory.cpp:116
#6  0x00002aaaabd91217 in xcerla::xrs::BalanceManagerMemoryTest::testbackup (
    this=0x576610) at BalanceManagerMemoryTest.cpp:498

    REPEAT BY:
rerun the affected unit test

    SAMPLE FIX/WORKAROUND:
not known

Lothar
-- 
Lothar Werzinger Dipl.-Ing. Univ.
framework & platform architect
Xcerla Corporation
275 Tennant Avenue, Suite 202
Morgan Hill, Ca 95037
email: lothar@xcerla.com
phone: +1-408-776-9018

0
Lothar
5/13/2005 6:38:41 PM
comp.soft-sys.ace 20326 articles. 1 followers. marlow.andrew (167) is leader. Post Follow

0 Replies
703 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 4

Reply:

Similar Artilces:

RE: [ace-users] segfault on linux x86-64 with ACE/TAO 5.4.4/1.4.4
Hi Lothar, Thanks for using the PRF form. It looks that one of the pointers to strcmp is zero, maybe that results in the crash. Could you post a small test app that reproduces the problem? Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl > ACE VERSION: 5.4.4 > > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > uname -a > Linux janus 2.6.11.4-20a-default #1 Wed Mar 23 21:52:37 UTC > 2005 x86_64 x86_64 > x86_64 GNU/Linux > > TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: > COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): > gcc-4.0.0 --version > gcc-4.0.0 (GCC) 4.0.0 > > CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h [if you use a link to > a platform- > specific file, simply state which one]: > cat /opt2/linux/x86_64/ACE/1.4.4/ACE_wrappers/ace/config.h > #define ACE_HAS_XML_SVC_CONF > #include "ace/config-linux.h" > > CONTENTS OF > $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU (unless > this isn't used in this case, e.g., with Microsoft Visual C++): > cat > /opt2/linux/x86_64/ACE/1.4.4/ACE_wrappers/include/makeinclude/ > platform_macros.GNU > > # configure ACE/TAO for our use > > debug=1 > optimize=1 > exceptions=1 > threads=1 > inline=1 > rtti=1 > versioned_so=1 > interface_repo=1 > ssl=...

RE: [ace-users] segfault on linux x86-64 with ACE/TAO 5.4.4/1.4.4 #2
Hi, > Thanks for the reply. > The reason why I posted the stacktrace is that I have > currently no clue how to > reproduce a small testcase. But I will keep trying. > > I had the hope that someone familiar with ACE_Malloc_T<> > could shed light on > this subject. As I said the curious thing is that it works > with 32bit and > fails with 64bit. The only thing that I can imagine off is that somewhere a 64bit pointer is by accident handled as 32bit. Johnny ...

[ace-users] Re: [tao-support] Has ACE 5.4.4/TAO 1.4.4 been built with gcc 4.0.0 yet
Hi Robert, > When building ACE 5.4.4/TAO 1.4.4 using gcc 4.0.0 under fedora core > 4 test 2 on an x86 platform I get a lot of errors mainly to do with > template instantiations. Has anyone successfully build TAO/ACE using > the latest gcc ? We just added GCC 4.0.0 support to ACE+TAO recently. The forthcoming x.4.5 beta should work nicely with GCC 4.0.0. We hope to have this available very shortly (there's just one remaining snag with typecodes that should be fixed in the next day or so). If you'd like to give things a try before we release x.4.5 please download the contents of ACE+TAO from our CVS repo at http://cvs.doc.wustl.edu/ and see if it works for you on your platform. If not, please let us know and we'll try to make sure that it's working before we put out the beta release. Thanks, Doug I've tried the CVS version on macosx 10.4, with gcc4.0 and still got the same intantiation problem. On 5/9/05, Douglas C. Schmidt <schmidt@cs.wustl.edu> wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > > When building ACE 5.4.4/TAO 1.4.4 using gcc 4.0.0 under fedora core > > 4 test 2 on an x86 platform I get a lot of errors mainly to do with > > template instantiations. Has anyone successfully build TAO/ACE using > > the latest gcc ? > > We just added GCC 4.0.0 support to ACE+TAO recently. The forthcoming > x.4.5 beta should work nicely with GCC 4.0.0. We hope to ha...

[ace-users] Re: a little bug of ACE-5.4.1+TAO-1.4.1+CIAO-0.4.1.tar.gz
Hi Adam, Please upgrade to ACE+TAO x.4.8, which you can download from http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html under the heading "latest beta kit". The DOC groups at Washington University, UC Irvine, and Vanderbilt University only provide "best effort" support for non-sponsors for the latest beta kit, as described in http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/docs/ACE-bug-process.html Thus, if you need more "predictable" help for ACE 5.4.1, I recommend that you check out http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/commercial-support.html for a list of companies that will provide you with ACE+TAO commercial support. Thanks, Doug >> When I compile this version, it prompts me the following errors that >> /*------ >> gmake[6]: *** No rule to make target `Client_Request_Interceptor.cpp', >> needed by `.obj/Client_Request_Interceptor.o'. Stop. >> ------*/ >> >> Then I find there is something wrong about the directory: >> /export/home/adam/ace.5.4.1.cc.64/TAO/tests/Portable_Interceptors/Request_Interceptor_Flow >> There are two files whose file names suffix are very strange. >> 1. Client_Request_Interceptor.cp >> 2. Server_Request_Interceptor.cp >> After I rename them from .cp to .cpp >> >> I wonder if this is a bug or some thing I configure wrong? >> >> Regards, >> Adam >> -...

[ace-bugs] Error during compilation ACE-5.4.4 + TAO-1.4.4
--001485f99caa0c8d8c0475c7d5ee Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hello,I'm trying to compile ACE-5.4.4+TAO-1.4.4 and I got an error while I trying to compile it: /home/mchacon/nextgen/extra/ACE_wrappers/ace/os_include/os_stropts.h:64:28: error: stropts.h: No such file or directory I use Fedora 11 with gcc 4.4.1 and I was searching in google and I found that there are some is issue about strems buffer in Linux, please take a look these links: http://www.archivum.info/comp.soft-sys.ace/2008-04/00069/Re:_[tao-users]_PRF:_Autobuild_on_Fedora_Rawhide_(GCC_4.3.0)_is_a_no-go https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439403 Is there any workaround to fix it? I have the header in Fedora Core 3, but I trying to make it work in Fedora 11, Is it possible? Thanks and Regards! Salu2... masch... --001485f99caa0c8d8c0475c7d5ee Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello,<div>I&#39;m trying to compile ACE-5.4.4+TAO-1.4.4 and I got an error= while I trying to compile it:</div><div><br></div><div>/home/mchacon/nextg= en/extra/ACE_wrappers/ace/os_include/os_stropts.h:64:28: error: stropts.h: = No such file or directory</div> <div><br></div><div>I use Fedora 11 with gcc 4.4.1 and=C2=A0I was searching= in google and I found that there are some is issue about strems buffer in = Linux, please take a look these links:</div&g...

RE: [tao-users] Re: [ace-users] Re: Announcing the release of the new beta (ACE-5.4.10, TAO-1.4.10 and CIAO-0.4.10)
Hi, > > >> We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your > > >> applications, and let us know soon if you encounter any problems > > >> since we plan to cut the x.5 release by February 28th. > > > > As per Wallace's comments, we have an aggressive schedule > for the x.5 > > release to meet the needs of some major sponsors. If > people can give > > x.4.10 a "test drive" in the next couple of days and report problems > > they encounter we'll try to ensure that we fix any > showstoppers before > > According to bugzilla bug 2323 is not fixed yet. > > http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2323 > > For us it is a show stopper. We use the OCI version which does not > have problems related to this bug but it would be nice to be able to > use the latest version with more fixes. FYI, the reason that this test now fails is because Ossama added several new test cases which wheren't in the test in the past, this uncovered some bugs which according to our information where already there a long time. Johnny "Johnny Willemsen" <jwillemsen@remedy.nl> writes: > > > >> We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your > > > >> applications, and let us know soon if you encounter any problems > > > >> sinc...

[tao-users] RE: [ace-users] XML service configuration no longer works with ACE/TAO 5.4.5/1.4.5
Hi Lothar > � � ACE VERSION: 5.4.5 Thanks for using the PRF form. Could you try to find the problem and send us patches to fix this? Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl > > � � HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > uname -a > Linux janus 2.6.11.4-20a-default #1 Wed Mar 23 21:52:37 UTC > 2005 x86_64 x86_64 > x86_64 GNU/Linux > > � � TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: > � � COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): > gcc-4.0.0 --version > gcc-4.0.0 (GCC) 4.0.0 > > � � CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h [if you use a link to > a platform- > � � specific file, simply state which one]: > cat /opt2/linux/x86_64/ACE/1.4.4/ACE_wrappers/ace/config.h > #define ACE_HAS_XML_SVC_CONF > #include "ace/config-linux.h" > > � � CONTENTS OF > $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU (unless > � � this isn't used in this case, e.g., with Microsoft Visual C++): > cat > /opt2/linux/x86_64/ACE/1.4.4/ACE_wrappers/include/makeinclude/ > platform_macros.GNU > > # configure ACE/TAO for our use > > debug=1 > optimize=1 > exceptions=1 > threads=1 > inline=1 > rtti=1 > versioned_so=1 > interface_repo=1 > ssl=1 > > include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_linux.GNU ...

RE: [tao-users] RE: [ace-users] XML service configuration no longer works with ACE/TAO 5.4.5/1.4.5
Hi, > > Hi Lothar > > > > > � � ACE VERSION: 5.4.5 > > > > Thanks for using the PRF form. Could you try to find the > problem and send > > us patches to fix this? > > > > Regards, > > > > Johnny Willemsen > > I have no problem committing some time to the problem. I do > however know as > much as nothing about the ACE XML parser and it's recent > changes. It seems to > me that (some) of the recent changes might have caused the > test failures. So > if someone working actively on ACEXML gives me directions I > am willing to > spend my time investigating the problem. I can't remember that work has been done the last months so I am also amazed things broke. Nobody is actively working on it, so I think there are not much directions at this moment. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl On Wednesday 18 May 2005 11:01, Johnny Willemsen wrote: > Hi, > I can't remember that work has been done the last months so I am also > amazed things broke. Nobody is actively working on it, so I think there are > not much directions at this moment. Well, it did definiteley work with 5.4.4. So any changes that broke it must have been made between 5.4.4 and 5.4.5. I also read in the release email of 5.4.5 in the CIAO...

ACE+TAO+CIAO
Hi, We are happy to announce a new beta of ACE-5.4.4, TAO-1.4.4 and CIAO-0.4.4. This beta provides improved support for VxWorks 5.5.1 using static libraries and fixes a number of important bugs reported by our users. Thanks to all our users for reporting these issues. As usual the latest release is available at: http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html The doxygen documentation for the beta will be updated in the next few hours! We highly encourage you to download the present beta and use it with your applications and let us know if there are any problems. As always, please use the: $ACE_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $TAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $CIAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM so that we have the version/platform/compiler/options you're using to report problems. We would also request that you take a look at $TAO_ROOT/docs/releasenotes $CIAO_ROOT/docs/releasenotes for the status of various ongoing projects at the doc groups of WashU, UCI, and Vanderbilt to move ACE+TAO+CIAO forward. The overall succeeded test results gathered from all our daily builds is 97% for the ACE tests and 92% for the TAO tests. In addition the following is a list of noteworthy changes since the last beta. Please refer to the ChangeLog for more details on the problem and the nature of fixes applied. Changes common to ACE+TAO+CIAO ============================== .. Removed MPC code that creates unused and unnecessary subfolders in Visual ...

RE: [ace-users] ACE+TAO+CIAO
Hi, Please use the prf form and which configuration you build. I personally think you have an old version of ACE/TAO on the system that is used. Regards, Johnny > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu > [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Domingos Monteiro > Sent: donderdag 9 juni 2005 18:05 > To: Simon McQueen > Cc: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: Re: [ace-users] ACE+TAO+CIAO - 5.4.6 + 1.4.6 + 0.4.6 released > > Hi, > > I've just dowloaded this version > I've started to compile ACE with > - MSVC 7.1 > - Win XP > And get the following link errors: > > Message_Block.obj : error LNK2005: "public: virtual void __thiscall > ACE_Deadline_Message_Strategy::convert_priority(class ACE_Time_Value > &,class ACE_Message_Block const &)" > (?convert_priority@ACE_Deadline_Message_Strategy@@UAEXAAVACE_T > ime_Value@@ABVACE_Message_Block@@@Z) > already defined in CDR_Size.obj > Message_Block.obj : error LNK2005: "public: virtual void __thiscall > ACE_Laxity_Message_Strategy::convert_priority(class ACE_Time_Value > &,class ACE_Message_Block const &)" > (?convert_priority@ACE_Laxity_Message_Strategy@@UAEXAAVACE_Tim > e_Value@@ABVACE_Message_Block@@@Z) > already defined in CDR_Size.obj > SString.obj : error LNK2005: "public: __thiscall > ACE_NS_WString::ACE_N...

[ace-users] Announcing the release of the new beta (ACE-5.4.8, TAO-1.4.8 and CIAO-0.4.8)
[The following is on behalf of the PrismTech build-czars!] Hi, We are pleased to announce a new beta of ACE-5.4.8, TAO-1.4.8, and CIAO-0.4.8. We are currently working hard on the long-awaited x.5 release, which is slated to appear in early 2006. We therefore wanted to get this new beta out to fix several important bugs reported by our users, which we greatly appreciate as always. We've added a number of sub-setting improvements that reduce the static/dynamic footprint of ACE+TAO significantly (www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/Stats has all the details). We've also finally added support for Real-time CCM to CIAO and DAnCE. This beta is contains the results of our major footprint reduction effort that started in the summer of 2004. Between August 1st 2004 and October 14th 2005 the footprint reduction for the ORB_Init application has been 20%. Dependent on the parts of TAO you use the reduction can even be more. This reduction is inclusive all the extensions that have been made to TAO the last year. Interested users should check out http://www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/Stats/ for more details. Note that the footprint has increased slightly again due to emulated exceptions having been disabled in favour of native C++ exceptions in all stats builds. We have deprecated support for emulated exceptions since there are no sponsors for this configuration. If you require emulated exceptions please contact one of the companies listed in http://w...

[ace-users] Announcing the release of the new beta (ACE-5.4.9, TAO-1.4.9 and CIAO-0.4.9)
Hi, We are pleased to announce a new beta of ACE-5.4.9, TAO-1.4.9, and CIAO-0.4.9. The documentation for this beta kit will be available shortly. We are still working very hard on the x.5 release, which is scheduled to be released by the beginning of March if all goes well. We wanted to get this new beta out to fix several important bugs reported by our users, which we greatly appreciate, as always. We've also added a number of improvements to the various components in ACE, TAO and CIAO. As usual the latest release is available at: http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html The doxygen documentation for the beta is also available. We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your applications, and let us know if you encounter any problems. Please use the: $ACE_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $TAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $CIAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM so that we have the version/platform/compiler/options you're using to report problems. We also request that you take a look at $TAO_ROOT/docs/releasenotes for the status of various ongoing projects at the DOC groups of WashU, UCI, and Vanderbilt to move ACE+TAO+CIAO forward. Overviews of our recent progress and upcoming plans are available at $ACE_ROOT/NEWS $TAO_ROOT/NEWS $CIAO_ROOT/NEWS The overall success rates for the test results gathered from all our daily builds is 95.68% for the ACE tests and 88.6% for the TAO tests. Please see http://www.dr...

[tao-users] Use of TAO_OutputCDR and ACE_Message_Block in CORBA::Any from TAO 1.4.1|ACE 5.4.1 to TAO2.2.0|ACE 6.2.0
This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00BF_01CEA8D4.9E005C80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable TAO VERSION: 2.2.0 ACE VERSION: 6.2.0 =20 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: x86_64 and Red Hat - Linux 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 =20 TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: =20 COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): gcc (GCC) 4.8.1 =20 THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h FILE: config-linux.h =20 THE $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU FILE: platform_linux.GNU =20 CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/bin/MakeProjectCreator/config/default.features (used by MPC when you generate your own makefiles): =20 AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: TAO_OutputCDR and ACE_Message_Block. =20 DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT: EXECUTION. My application is affected. =20 SYNOPSIS: The code that extract data from CORBA::Any using TAO_OutputCDR and ACE_Message_Block for user defined types works properly in the old platform (TAO 1.4.1|ACE 5.4.1), but not in the new one(ACE 6.2.0). =20 DESCRIPTION: The code in the =93REPEAT BY=94 section works fine in the old platform = for user defined types, that is, the TAO_OutputCDR and ACE_Message_Block objects have the same length, but in the new platform th...

[ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86
Hi,all ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: Solaris10 X86 TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): Compiler: SUN CC 5.6 Make: GNU make 3.80 CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h [if you use a link to a platform- specific file, simply state which one]: #include "ace/config-sunos5.9.h" CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU (unless this isn't used in this case, e.g., with Microsoft ...

[ciao-users] ACE+TAO+CIAO
Hi, We are pleased to announce a new beta of ACE-5.4.5, TAO-1.4.5 and CIAO-0.4.5. This beta contains a number of time/space optimizations, including POA/Skeleton refactoring and TypeCode reimplementation. It also fixes a number of important bugs reported by our users, which we greatly appreciate, as always. As usual the latest release is available at: http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html The doxygen documentation for the beta will be updated in the next few hours! We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your applications, and let us know if you encounter any problems. As always, please use the: $ACE_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $TAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $CIAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM so that we have the version/platform/compiler/options you're using to report problems. We also request that you take a look at $TAO_ROOT/docs/releasenotes $CIAO_ROOT/docs/releasenotes for the status of various ongoing projects at the DOC groups of WashU, UCI, and Vanderbilt to move ACE+TAO+CIAO forward. Overviews of our recent progress and upcoming plans are available at $ACE_ROOT/NEWS $TAO_ROOT/NEWS $CIAO_ROOT/NEWS The overall succeeded test results gathered from all our daily builds is 98% for the ACE tests and 93% for the TAO tests. Please see http://www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/scoreboard/ for a summary of these tests. Our goal is to get these tests close to 100% for the next major release (i.e., ACE 6.0,...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86
Hi, >> ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 Thakns for using the PRF! >> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: >> Solaris10 X86 We (i.e., the DOC groups at UCI/VU/WU) don't have Solaris running on an x86 box (yet). It would therefore be great if you could figure out what patches need to be applied so that ACE compiles properly on this platform. BTW, Kitty/Bala, weren't we planning on running Solaris on an AMD box at some point? Thanks, Doug >> TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: >> COMPIL...

[ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86
Hi Jin, >> The solaris 9/10 for sparc is not the same as solaris 9/10 for >> Intel X86,although it is almost free,and the SunStudio 9 (CC >> 5.6)for sparc is not the same as SunStudio 9(CC 5.6) for Intel X86. This is yet one more reason why you'll need to do the legwork on this. Please let us know what you find out. Thanks, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt, Professor TEL: (615) 343-8197 Electrical Engineering and Computer Science FAX: (615) 343-7440 Vanderbilt University WEB: www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ Nashvil...

[ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi, ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: Solaris 10 x86 TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): Sun Studio 9 (Sun CC 5.6) CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h [if you use a link to a platform- specific file, simply state which one]: #define ACE_HAS_STANDARD_CPP_LIBRARY 1 #define ACE_USES_STD_NAMESPACE_FOR_STDCPP_LIB 1 #include "ace/config-sunos5.9.h" CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU (unless ...

[ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi,all I rebuild the ACE package according the instruction above,but get the same result. my platform_macros.GNU file has the following lines: templates = implicit include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU When i rebuild the ACE library,get the following compile errors: $ make inline=0 -j 2 -k -f GNUmakefile.ACE .... .... CC -mt -g -DSUN_CC_HAS_PVFC_BUG -I/export/home/hua/DevTools/ACE_wrappers -DACE_HAS_EXCEPTIONS -DACE_NO_INLINE -I.. -DACE_HAS_ACE_TOKEN -DACE_HAS_ACE_SVCCONF -DACE_BUILD_DLL -c -KPIC -o .shobj/OS_NS_sys_stat.o OS_NS_sys_...

RE: [ace-users] XML service configuration no longer works with ACE/TAO 5.4.5/1.4.5
Hi, > Well, it did definiteley work with 5.4.4. So any changes that > broke it must > have been made between 5.4.4 and 5.4.5. I also read in the > release email of > 5.4.5 in the CIAO section: > > The Config Handlers have been modified to use XML parsing code > � generated by the XML Schema Compiler (XSC). �Binary releases of XSC > � can currently be found at > (http://www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/~boris/xsc), > � and a recent snapshot of the CVS repository can be found at > � (http://www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/~wotte/xsc.tbz2). �We plan > to integrate > � XSC into the CVS repo and release soon. This is CIAO only, there must be a change in ACEXML or ACE that has done this. The ACEXML library has it own changelog > I don't know if that affects only CIAO or ACE as well, but it > might be > related. > > I would be still glad if someone has any pointers/ideas where > exactely I > should spend my time efficiently in order to investigate the problem. > > P.S. > Aren't there any nightly build configuration(s) that uses XML > rather than the > old service configuration? No, so far as I know there are no builds testing this. Another option you have is pass this on to a commercial support organization and also sponsor then an autobuild with xml service config files. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The ...

[ace-users] ACE-5.4+TAO-1.4 compilation error.
Here is the problem report: ACE VERSION: 5.4 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: cygwin on w2k TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): VxWork 5.5.1 Tornado 2.2 CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h: config-vxworks5.x_g++.h CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU (unless this isn't used in this case, e.g., with Microsoft Visual C++): include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_vxworks5.x_g++.GNU AREA/CLASS/...

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi Steve, > > Is this necessary? I mean make it implicit by default. The > > explicit is > > not even supported, and has no chance to work cleanly. Why > > should we patch > > broken stuff. Just a thought? > > At least for ACE 5.5, Riverace supports the Forte compiler that > requires explicit. After that, we can drop it. Ok. Steve, could you maybe make clear with the build names which builds use explicit templates? Explicit templates in TAO are known to be broken at this moment. Johnny ...

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
> > Ok, the problem is in platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU, when a > not known forte > > version is found, it defaults to explicit. I am updating > right now, for 4.2 > > and 5.3 we default to explicit, for all others to implicit This sounds good. > Is this necessary? I mean make it implicit by default. The > explicit is > not even supported, and has no chance to work cleanly. Why > should we patch > broken stuff. Just a thought? At least for ACE 5.5, Riverace supports the Forte compiler that requires explicit. After that, we can drop it....

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi Jin, >> I rebuild the ACE package according the instruction above,but get >> the same result. It doesn't look to me like you've added -DACE_HAS_X86_STAT_MACROS to the build-line as recommended by Johnny Willemsen. >> my platform_macros.GNU file has the following lines: >> >> templates = implicit >> include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU >> >> When i rebuild the ACE library,get the following compile errors: >> $ make inline=0 -j 2 -k -f GNUmakefile.ACE >> ... >&...

Web resources about - [ace-users] segfault on linux x86-64 with ACE/TAO 5.4.4/1.4.4 - comp.soft-sys.ace

Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 User Reviews
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 reviews written by Phone Arena users. You can read the opinion of each user and how they rate the phone in 11 categories. ...

Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 official: iPhone-alike size for the new user
Samsung has revealed another in its Galaxy series, the Galaxy Ace 3, now targeting entry-level smartphone users who want a pocket-friendly 4-inch ...

Resources last updated: 3/5/2016 3:57:43 PM