f



RE: [ace-users] ACE 5.3 - TAO 1.3 on AIX 5.3 with compiler Visual Age Version 7.0

Hi,

5.3 is ancient, visual age 7 is brand new, I don't think anyone is using
this and you problaby will find issues because this is not tested.

Regards,

Johnny Willemsen
Remedy IT
Postbus 101
2650 AC  Berkel en Rodenrijs
The Netherlands
www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl   

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu 
> [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Praveen 
> Kumar Gulati
> Sent: woensdag 19 oktober 2005 9:08
> To: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu
> Subject: [ace-users] ACE 5.3 - TAO 1.3 on AIX 5.3 with 
> compiler Visual Age Version 7.0
> 
> Hi
> 
> I am trying to build ACE 5.3 - TAO 1.3 on AIX 5.3 with 
> compiler Visual Age Version 7.0.
> 
> Do you already know some issues in above combination? 
> 
> Whether some one is already using above combination?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Praveen Gulati
> 
> 












0
Johnny
10/19/2005 7:14:57 AM
comp.soft-sys.ace 20326 articles. 1 followers. marlow.andrew (167) is leader. Post Follow

0 Replies
868 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 42

Reply:

Similar Artilces:

[ace-users] Re: Error while ACE 5.3.1 or 5.4.1 compiling and installing by MinGW 3.3.3
Hi Vitaly, Please upgrade to ACE 5.4.4, which you can download from http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html since I think that is more likely to work with MinGW 3.3.3. Johnny, can you confirm/deny this please? Thanks, Doug >> Hi, >> I have installed MinGW packages: >> >> binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1.tar.gz >> gcc-core-3.3.3-20040217-1.tar.gz >> gcc-g++-3.3.3-20040217-1.tar.gz >> mingw-runtime-3.3.tar.gz >> w32api-2.5.tar.gz >> >> Also I've configured environment due to ACE-INSTALL.html according >> MinGW compiler. OS: WinXP SP2. >> >> $ACE_ROOT=F:\ACE531 >> >> I get next compiling error: >> F:\ACE531\ace>gmake >> gmake.EXE[1]: Entering directory `F:/ACE531/ace' >> d:\Utils\Unix\diff.EXE: -: Invalid argument >> gmake.EXE[1]: Leaving directory `F:/ACE531/ace' >> gmake.EXE[1]: Entering directory `F:/ACE531/ace' >> d:/Utils/Unix/gmake.EXE -f Makefile.dirs SUBDIR_TARGET=all >> RMCast.subdir >> gmake.EXE[2]: Entering directory `F:/ACE531/ace' >> d:/Utils/Unix/gmake.EXE -f Makefile -C RMCast all >> gmake.EXE[3]: Entering directory `F:/ACE531/ace/RMCast' >> Installing libACE_RMCast.dll -> F:\ACE531/ace >> d:\Utils\Unix\cp.EXE: F:ACE531aceRMCast/libACE_RMCast.dll: No such >> file or directory >> Installing libACE_RMCa...

RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3)
Hi Tom, > > > The "resolution" was to upgrade to ACE-5.4.3 or later, which has > > > code fixes to help with the newer compiler. Not sure how > much would > > > need to change, but you may be able to inspect the differences in > > > that part of the code wrt the newer ACE release to backport the > > > fixes. > > Thanks, I've downloaded and am building. Is ACE-5.4.3 the latest > > production release ? > > Well, the definition of "production release" for ACE is a bit murky > imho. Production release is one with 2 numbers. E.g., 5.4 > The developers on this list (almost) always recommend using the > latest package, which is typically labeled a "beta release". > The latest > would be 5.4.4. The developers always recommend *not* using the > "production release", since the next release labeled "beta" > is always a bug-fix-only release. I believe I qualify as a "developer", but have a different take. Production releases are tested well, and often better than the BFO beta. There may be fixes in BFO, but there may be additional bugs also - it happened at 5.4.1. For those wishing to adopt a version of ACE and stick with it, you'll need a version you can get support (fixes and advice) for. For example, Riverace supports releases (e.g., 5.4) and fix kits that Riverace releases for those (i...

RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3) #2
Hi Colm, Ok, thanks for that explanation. I solved this a different way for a similar problem that showed up with Visual Age C++ on AIX 5.2... When the 5.4.5 beta comes out, please try this again and hopefully no further workarounds will be needed. Thanks, -Steve -- Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation Adding Service to Open Source Software ACE book info at http://www.riverace.com/acebooks/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Colm McHugh [mailto:cmchugh@callixa.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 1:05 PM > To: Steve Huston > Cc: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: Re: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after > GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3) > > > > >Sure... Why do you say <sys/machine.h> is a prerequisite for > ><netinet/tcp.h>? I addressed a problem related to this in > the autoconf > >support for AIX that'll go in the next beta, but it doesn't involve > >machine.h. > > > Hi Steve, > > that statement is based on the compilation sequence shown > below (done on > an AIX 5.2): > > $ cat t2.cpp > #include <sys/machine.h> > #include <netinet/tcp.h> > int main() > {} > $ g++ t2.cpp > $ cat t1.cpp > #include <netinet/tcp.h> > int main() > {} > $ g++ t1.cpp > In file incl...

RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3) #2
Hi J.T., Right... The issue is a bit odd... Here's the check I added for ACE: dnl This check was added to work around a system-supplied header dnl (/usr/include/netinet/ip.h) that won't compile with Visual Age C++ dnl unless the _NO_BITFIELDS preprocessor macro is defined. The comments dnl there recommend use of _NO_BITFIELDS (and recode where needed to allow dnl that), but we won't just turn it on. Check to see if it's needed. Note dnl that this check is related to headers but done before we really know if dnl the header is present. Thus, if the bare compile fails, but succeeds dnl with _NO_BITFIELDS, set the flag, else leave things alone. -Steve -- Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation Adding Service to Open Source Software ACE book info at http://www.riverace.com/acebooks/ > -----Original Message----- > From: J.T. Conklin [mailto:jtc@acorntoolworks.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 2:21 PM > To: Colm McHugh > Cc: Steve Huston; ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: Re: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after > GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3) > > > Colm McHugh <cmchugh@callixa.com> writes: > >>Sure... Why do you say <sys/machine.h> is a prerequisite for > >><netinet/tcp.h>? I addressed a problem related to this in > the autoconf > >>support for AIX that'll go in the next beta, but it doesn't involve...

[ace-users] Re: How can I use ACE(Latest Beta Kit) for AIX version 5.3/5.2 and VisualAge C++ 7.0/6.0 for AIX on machine IBM P690? \
Hi Oliana, Thanks very much for your email. Please make sure to send all questions related to TAO or ACE to the ACE mailing list or ACE+TAO newsgroup, rather than to me directly since I travel frequently and often don't have ready access to email. See http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE-mail.html for more info on how to access these resources. > I want to use ACE.tar.bz2(Latest Beta Kit) on AIX version 5.3,Now > I'm writing application program base on ACE.tar.bz2 (Latest Beta > Kit) and testing ACE.tar.bz2(Latest Beta Kit) on AIX version 5.2 for > IBM P690 and using VisualAge C++ 6.0 and VisualAge C++ 7.0,It?s very > strange ,the ACE.tar.bz2 was compiled successful,But the application > program can?t be compiled success,There are a lot of problems.It has > reported a lot of mistakes of STL head file in VisualAge ,and then > It told me there are something wrong in VisualAge C++ 6.0/7.0's head > file.I don't know why,Then ,I written testing code ,only have tested > VisualAge C++ 6.0 and VisualAge C++ 7.0 for AIX version 5.2's head > file already,the compiler was compiling and running up to snuff,no > mistake in head file.And you know ,When I put the same application > program and ACE.tar.bz2(Latest Beta Kit) in Redhatlinux for PC and > Turbo linux for IBM eServe BladeCenter, there are no mistakes,and > It?s normally compiling and running so fast.So,I don?t know why,what > happ...

[ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3)
Hi Tom, > Well, the definition of "production release" for ACE is a bit murky > imho. Please see http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/docs/ACE-development-process.html for the canonical definition of terms. If there's something unclear there please let me know and I'll fixit. > The developers on this list (almost) always recommend using the > latest package, which is typically labeled a "beta release". Right, the reason we do that is because the "latest release" (which is most commonly a beta release) is the only thing the DOC group developers "support". > The latest would be 5.4.4. The developers always recommend *not* > using the "production release", since the next release labeled > "beta" is always a bug-fix-only release. So I usually use the x.x.1 > release (the BFO release) but would probably recommend using 5.4.4 > on any platform, as do the developers. I think you probably know this already, but for the benefit of others on the mailing list the DOC grou doesn't actually support *anything* officially for non-sponsors, i.e., our work is all on a "best effort or no effort at all" basis, as per the explanation in http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/docs/ACE-bug-process.html However, some companies like Riverace, OCI, PrismTech, etc. use our "official" (i.e., non-beta) releases as the basis f...

Re: [ace-users] Errors while compiling c++ 3.4.2
Hi Eyal, I believe we've fixed these problems in the latest version of ACE that's tucked inside our CVS repository. Can you please take a look at this version available in http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html and see if things work better. If not, please let us know so we can fix them before we release ACE 5.4.3 in a week or so. Thanks, Doug >> I get the following while compiling: >> >> /usr/bin/c++ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199506L -DNDEBUG -DUSING_GCC >> -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -DLINUX -I../inc >> -I../3rd_party...

[ace-users] ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3)
[Apologies if this shows up twice, there was a mailer error with my first attempt to post] Hi, I found the same problem reported recently on the mailing list ("compiling ACE under Fedora core 3", March 1st) but no resolution was reported there, so I thought I'd post a full description here. ACE VERSION: 5.4 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: AIX 5.1 COMPILER: GNU GCC G++ 3.4.3 CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h: // config-aix5.1.h,v 1.5 2003/12/16 17:49:48 elliott_c Exp // // Config file for AIX 5.1 // This define is needed for building with Visual Age C++ 5 in incremental // mode. In the batch mode build, platform_aix_ibm.GNU sets it. The incremental // mode compiler won't be supported after ACE 5.3, so this will also go away // in that timeframe, so don't worry about future AIX versions. #if !defined (ACE_AIX_VE...

Re: [ace-users] Compiling ACE 5.3 with GCC 3.4.3
Hi, When x.3 was released there was no GCC 3.4 version, so this will just not work, please upgrade to a newer version of ACE/TAO. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl "Seng-Quee.Liang" <Seng-Quee.Liang@Sun.COM> wrote in message news:<mailman.1894.1170813530.25808.ace-users@mail.cse.wustl.edu>... > Hi, > > I'm a newbie to ACE and this is my 1st posting to this alias, and would > appreciate any help. > > I have a requirement to use ACE 5.3 on Solaris 10 SPARC. I had followed > the building & installation information on ACE website to the letter and > had no problems compiling it with Sun Studio 11. > > However, when I tried compiling it with GCC 3.4.3, I'm swamped with a > host of problems. Being a newbie to ACE, I'm wondering > > a) if I'm setting the right config.h/platform_macros.GNU for GCC > compile; > b) if I should be trying add flags into these files to get it to > compile. > > Any pointers or advice is sincerely appreciated. > > > Thanks in advance. > > Best Regards, > /SengQuee > > -------- config.h for Studio 11 ----- > #include "ace/config-sunos5.9.h" > > -------- platform_macros.GNU for Studio 11 ----- > include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU &...

[ace-users] Errors while compiling c++ 3.4.2
I get the following while compiling: /usr/bin/c++ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199506L -DNDEBUG -DUSING_GCC -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -DLINUX -I../inc -I../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers -fPIC -pedantic -fno-for-scope -Wno-long-long -Wno-deprecated -o Trace.o.linux -c Trace.cpp In file included from .../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers/ace/Unbounded_Set.h:306, from ../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers/ace/Memory_Pool.h:30, from ../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers/ace/Malloc.h:414, from ../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers/ace/String_Base....

Re: [ace-users] compiling issue on Sun 5.8 with ACE 5.3 #2 #3
Hi, Are we still talking about ACE problems, looks now that you have a problem in your application code. What for code is in Global.h on line 43? Johnny "Manish Jain" <mjain@itangel.com> wrote in message news:<00a101c34b71$cbf5b110$5ec809c0@angels.com>... > Can you please also lookint to the following error as well: > > > Compiling /v/sbansal/out/temp/playground/ExecAgent.o > /opt/SUNWspro/bin/CC -temp=/v/sbansal/out/temp -g -c -Bdynamic -ldl > -mt -libr > ary=iostream,rwtools7 -DACE_HAS_EXCEPTIONS -o > /v/sbansal/out/temp/playground/Ex...

Re: [ace-bugs] Compilation error on SUSE 8.0, gcc 2.95.3 with ace 5.3.0 and latest version
Hi, Thanks for using the PRF. We build daily with SuSE 8.2 and GCC 3.3 and don't have problems. Try to set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to a full path for a test. I think you have to search the problem in the export of ACE_ROOT and LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT BV Leeghwaterstraat 25 2811 DT Reeuwijk The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl <jahb@lineone.net> wrote in message news:<3F216AC2000202DE@mk-cpfrontend-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com>... > ACE VERSION: > > 5.3.0 (and latest beta version) > > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: &g...

Error while ACE 5.3.1 or 5.4.1 compiling and installing by MinGW 3.3.3
Hi, I have installed MinGW packages: binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1.tar.gz gcc-core-3.3.3-20040217-1.tar.gz gcc-g++-3.3.3-20040217-1.tar.gz mingw-runtime-3.3.tar.gz w32api-2.5.tar.gz Also I've configured environment due to ACE-INSTALL.html according MinGW compiler. OS: WinXP SP2. $ACE_ROOT=F:\ACE531 I get next compiling error: F:\ACE531\ace>gmake gmake.EXE[1]: Entering directory `F:/ACE531/ace' d:\Utils\Unix\diff.EXE: -: Invalid argument gmake.EXE[1]: Leaving directory `F:/ACE531/ace' gmake.EXE[1]: Entering directory `F:/ACE531/ace' d:/Utils/Unix/gmake.EXE -f Makefile.dirs SUBDIR_TARGET=all RMCast.subdir gmake.EXE[2]: Entering directory `F:/ACE531/ace' d:/Utils/Unix/gmake.EXE -f Makefile -C RMCast all gmake.EXE[3]: Entering directory `F:/ACE531/ace/RMCast' Installing libACE_RMCast.dll -> F:\ACE531/ace d:\Utils\Unix\cp.EXE: F:ACE531aceRMCast/libACE_RMCast.dll: No such file or directory Installing libACE_RMCast.dll -> F:\ACE531/ace d:\Utils\Unix\cp.EXE: F:ACE531aceRMCast/libACE_RMCast.dll: No such file or directory gmake.EXE[3]: *** [F:\ACE531/ace/libACE_RMCast.dll] Error 1 gmake.EXE[3]: Leaving directory `F:/ACE531/ace/RMCast' gmake.EXE[2]: *** [RMCast.subdir] Error 2 gmake.EXE[2]: Leaving directory `F:/ACE531/ace' gmake.EXE[1]: *** [all.nested] Error 2 gmake.EXE[1]: Leaving directory `F:/ACE531/ace' d:\Utils\Unix\gmake.EXE: *** [all] Error 2 There are no folder separators in path (for exampl...

[ace-users] Compiling ACE 5.3 with GCC 3.4.3
Hi, I'm a newbie to ACE and this is my 1st posting to this alias, and would appreciate any help. I have a requirement to use ACE 5.3 on Solaris 10 SPARC. I had followed the building & installation information on ACE website to the letter and had no problems compiling it with Sun Studio 11. However, when I tried compiling it with GCC 3.4.3, I'm swamped with a host of problems. Being a newbie to ACE, I'm wondering a) if I'm setting the right config.h/platform_macros.GNU for GCC compile; b) if I should be trying add flags into these files to get it to compile. Any pointers or advice is sincerely appreciated. Thanks in advance. Best Regards, /SengQuee -------- config.h for Studio 11 ----- #include "ace/config-sunos5.9.h" -------- platform_macros.GNU for Studio 11 ----- include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU -------- config.h for GCC 3.4.3 -------- #include "ace/config-sunos5.4-g++.h" -------- platform_macros.GNU for GCC 3.4.3 --------- include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_sunos5_g++.GNU --------- Compilation output with GCC ------------------------------ gmake[1]: Entering directory `/export/sw-images/ace/ACE_wrappers/ace' g++ -W -Wall -Wpointer-arith -pipe -O3 -g -fno-exceptions -fcheck-new -D_REENTRANT -I/export/sw-images/ace/ACE_wrappers -DACE_BUILD_DLL -DACE_OS_BUILD_DLL -c -fPIC -o .shobj/Basic_Types.o Basic_Types.cpp In file...

Re: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4 compiling problems with g++ 3.4.3
Hi > First, please use the problem-report-form when asking questions. ACE 5.4 is > not supported with newer GCC versions. All these issues are resolved in the > upcoming x.4.3 release. > > For the time being, try to add the following to your config.h > > # if (__GNUC__ > 3 || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 4)) > # define ACE_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_DESTRUCTOR_TAKES_ARGS > # endif /* __GNUC__ >= 3.4 */ > > You are correct, the download link doesn't work. Bala, do you have an idea > what is happening with the downlo...

[ace-users] Tests failed : ACE 5.5.2 - AIX 5.3
Hi, My first mail before my message in the group failed (my subscription was not activated). The PRF below describes my problems. I can compile and link but several ACE's tests fail. I only use ACE library and only compile it by cd'ing in the ace directory before running make. I already made some fixes described below to compile and to link the library. I'm not abble to interpret the faild tests to identify the problem source or area. I didn't find the scoreboard before my mail. I see that several tests fails for all compilations on AIX. I try to reassure myself by looking these results, it's not only for my configuration. But it's a daily build with last development version. For the 5.5.2 stable version they should probably not fail ? Regards, PO Houot. ACE VERSION: 5.5.2 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: bash-3.00$ uname -a AIX localhost 3 5 0040983B4C00 unknown unknown AIX bash-3.00$ oslevel -r 5300-05 TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: Same as host COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): bash-3.00$ g++ -v Using built-in specs. Target: powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0 Configured with: ../gcc-4.1.1/configure --disable-nls Thread model: aix gcc version 4.1.1 This compiler is installed from packages provided by UCLA AIX Software library THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h FILE : bash-3.00$ more $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h #include "ace/config-aix-5.x.h" T...

[ace-bug] Compile ACE 5.4 on AIX 5.2 with gcc 3.3.2
Failed to build ACE 5.4 on AIX 5.2 with gcc3.3.2 Used config-aix5.1.h and platform_aix_g++.GNU I failed with ACE5.1, 5.3 too, so I tried 5.4. Does anybody know IF it works ? Could it help to build my own AIX5.2 gcc ? (my gcc 3.3.2 is binary AIX 5.1 but it worked fine for Non-ACE- applications) Do I have to use IBM Visual C++ Compiler ? Any suggestions would be helpful. ACE VERSION: 5.4 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: RS/6000, 32-bit-kernel mode, AIX5.2 TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): ...

[ace-bugs] Compilation error on SUSE 8.0, gcc 2.95.3 with ace 5.3.0 and latest version
ACE VERSION: 5.3.0 (and latest beta version) HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: SUSE linux 8.0 If on Windows based OS's, which version of WINSOCK do you use?:n/a TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): gcc 2.95.3 GNU make 3.79.1 CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h: config-linux.h CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU (unless this isn't used in this case, e.g., with Microsoft Visual C++): platform_linux.GNU AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: [W...

[ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4 compiling problems with g++ 3.4.3
Hi Klaus, First, please use the problem-report-form when asking questions. ACE 5.4 is not supported with newer GCC versions. All these issues are resolved in the upcoming x.4.3 release. For the time being, try to add the following to your config.h # if (__GNUC__ > 3 || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 4)) # define ACE_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_DESTRUCTOR_TAKES_ARGS # endif /* __GNUC__ >= 3.4 */ You are correct, the download link doesn't work. Bala, do you have an idea what is happening with the download links. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT ...

RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4 compilation error on HP-UX 11.11/GNU g++ 3.4.3
The needed fix is, indeed, in ACE 5.5. If, for some reason, you need to stay on 5.4, the 5.4e Fix Kit from Riverace has this problem fixed as well. The fix is needed for g++ 3.4 on any platform. -Steve -- Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation Helping you succeed with ACE See http://www.riverace.com/support.htm > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu > [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas C. Schmidt > Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 7:01 PM > To: ecoboja@yahoo.com; ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4 compilation error on HP-UX > 11.11/GNU g++ 3.4.3 > > > Hi, > > Thanks for using the PRF. > > >> ACE VERSION: 5.4 > > Please upgrade to ACE 5.5, which you can download from > > http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html > > The DOC groups at Washington University, UC Irvine, and Vanderbilt > University only provide "best effort" support for non-sponsors for the > latest release, as described in > > http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/docs/ACE-bug-pro > cess.html > > Thus, if you need more "predictable" help for ACE 5.4, I recommend > that you check out > >...

[ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.10, STLPORT, GCC 3.3 & SunOS 5.8
Hi Rajesh, >> 1] I'm using the configure script to create the makefiles. I don't >> see any option to specify I would like to use STLPORT instead of >> libstdc++. How do I set this? Of course, I can hack the makefile >> to add this path, but is this the recommended method or is there a >> better option? Chad/J.T., is there some way to do this? >> If anyone has this working, inputs are greatly appreciated. >> 2] Does ace internally use STL? Not very much. >> I can see some configure options while configuring ace which >> relates to STL, do I have to set some option to tell ACE not to use >> STL internally or are ACE STL like functions independent of STL? Yes, that's the goal. If you run into problems please use the PRF and let us know. Thanks, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt Professor and Associate Chair Electrical Engineering and Computer Science TEL: (615) 343-8197 Institute for Software Integrated Systems WEB: www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/~schmidt Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN, 37203 NET: d.schmidt@vanderbilt.edu ...

[ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86
Hi Jin, >> The solaris 9/10 for sparc is not the same as solaris 9/10 for >> Intel X86,although it is almost free,and the SunStudio 9 (CC >> 5.6)for sparc is not the same as SunStudio 9(CC 5.6) for Intel X86. This is yet one more reason why you'll need to do the legwork on this. Please let us know what you find out. Thanks, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt, Professor TEL: (615) 343-8197 Electrical Engineering and Computer Science FAX: (615) 343-7440 Vanderbilt University WEB: www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ Nashvil...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86
Hi, >> ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 Thakns for using the PRF! >> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: >> Solaris10 X86 We (i.e., the DOC groups at UCI/VU/WU) don't have Solaris running on an x86 box (yet). It would therefore be great if you could figure out what patches need to be applied so that ACE compiles properly on this platform. BTW, Kitty/Bala, weren't we planning on running Solaris on an AMD box at some point? Thanks, Doug >> TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: >> COMPIL...

RE: [ace-users] [ACE 5.5] Upgrade from ACE 5.4.7 to ACE 5.5
Hi, > ACE VERSION: 5.5 Thanks for using the PRF form. > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > > Intel, WindowsXp, Windows 2003 An important bit information is missing, which compiler did you use. > AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: > The only problem we encountered was a compilation error > when construction ACE_Time_Value. > > The ACE_Time_Value cannot be constructed anymore from an integer. > > For example: ACE_Time_Value( 5 ) --> Compile error Great to hear things work without problems. This errors sounds strange, we do have test cases like this in tests/Time_Value_Test.cpp. We do have made all constructors of ACE_Time_Value explicit. As a result if you have a method that expects a ACE_Time_Value&, you just can't pass for example 5, you have to pass an ACE_Time_Value(5). Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl ...

[ace-users] RE: [ace-bugs] Building ACE: Error on SGI Irix6.5 w/ g++3.3
-----Original Message----- From: Krishnakumar B [mailto:kitty@dre.vanderbilt.edu] Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 5:09 PM To: Waltersdorf, Brian J Cc: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu; Ossama Othman Subject: RE: [ace-bugs] Building ACE: Error on SGI Irix6.5 w/ g++3.3 Can you please try the following patch? Please send me any compilation errors that occur because of this. Ofcourse, any such error should be easy to fix. Also, if you have SGI C++ installed, can you please test with config-irix6.x-sgic++.h as well? -kitty. ------------------------------------------------------------------...

Web resources about - RE: [ace-users] ACE 5.3 - TAO 1.3 on AIX 5.3 with compiler Visual Age Version 7.0 - comp.soft-sys.ace

Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 User Reviews
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 reviews written by Phone Arena users. You can read the opinion of each user and how they rate the phone in 11 categories. ...

Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 official: iPhone-alike size for the new user
Samsung has revealed another in its Galaxy series, the Galaxy Ace 3, now targeting entry-level smartphone users who want a pocket-friendly 4-inch ...

Resources last updated: 3/5/2016 12:17:26 PM