f



RE: [ace-users] ACE 5.3 - TAO 1.3 on AIX 5.3 with compiler Visual Age Version 7.0 #2

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_01BC_01C5D46D.2EF26B10
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Praveen,
=20
Riverace will have an AIX 5.3/Visual Age 7 machine running next week.
We have a sponsor for porting ACE 5.4 to the platform. If you'd like
to sponsor us porting back to ACE 5.3, please let me know.
=20
Best regards,
=20
-Steve

--
Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation
"How to Use ACE Effectively" class Oct 17-19!
See http://www.riverace.com/training.htm


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu
[mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Praveen Kumar
Gulati
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 3:08 AM
To: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu
Subject: [ace-users] ACE 5.3 - TAO 1.3 on AIX 5.3 with compiler Visual
Age Version 7.0


Hi

I am trying to build ACE 5.3 - TAO 1.3 on AIX 5.3 with compiler Visual
Age Version 7.0.

Do you already know some issues in above combination?=20

Whether some one is already using above combination?

Regards

Praveen Gulati


------=_NextPart_000_01BC_01C5D46D.2EF26B10
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<TITLE>Message</TITLE>

<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2722" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D074242109-19102005><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>Hi=20
Praveen,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D074242109-19102005><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =

size=3D2>Riverace will have an AIX 5.3/Visual Age 7 machine running next =
week. We=20
have a sponsor for porting ACE 5.4 to the platform. If you'd like to =
sponsor us=20
porting back to ACE 5.3, please let me know.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D074242109-19102005><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =

size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D074242109-19102005><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>Best=20
regards,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D074242109-19102005><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =

size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D074242109-19102005><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =

size=3D2>-Steve</FONT></SPAN></DIV><!-- Converted from text/plain format =
-->
<P><FONT size=3D2>--<BR>Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation<BR>"How to =
Use ACE=20
Effectively" class Oct 17-19!<BR>See <A=20
href=3D"http://www.riverace.com/training.htm">http://www.riverace.com/tra=
ining.htm</A><BR></FONT></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px =
solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV></DIV>
  <DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader lang=3Den-us dir=3Dltr =
align=3Dleft><FONT=20
  face=3DTahoma size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>=20
  owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] =
<B>On=20
  Behalf Of </B>Praveen Kumar Gulati<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, October =
19, 2005=20
  3:08 AM<BR><B>To:</B> ace-users@cs.wustl.edu<BR><B>Subject:</B> =
[ace-users]=20
  ACE 5.3 - TAO 1.3 on AIX 5.3 with compiler Visual Age Version=20
  7.0<BR><BR></FONT></DIV><FONT size=3D2>
  <P>Hi</P>
  <P>I am trying to build ACE 5.3 - TAO 1.3 on AIX 5.3 with compiler =
Visual Age=20
  Version 7.0.</P>
  <P>Do you already know some issues in above combination? </P>
  <P>Whether some one is already using above combination?</P>
  <P>Regards</P>
  <P>Praveen Gulati</P></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_01BC_01C5D46D.2EF26B10--


0
Steve
10/19/2005 9:30:40 AM
comp.soft-sys.ace 20326 articles. 1 followers. marlow.andrew (167) is leader. Post Follow

0 Replies
928 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 16

Reply:

Similar Artilces:

[ace-users] Re: Error while ACE 5.3.1 or 5.4.1 compiling and installing by MinGW 3.3.3
Hi Vitaly, Please upgrade to ACE 5.4.4, which you can download from http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html since I think that is more likely to work with MinGW 3.3.3. Johnny, can you confirm/deny this please? Thanks, Doug >> Hi, >> I have installed MinGW packages: >> >> binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1.tar.gz >> gcc-core-3.3.3-20040217-1.tar.gz >> gcc-g++-3.3.3-20040217-1.tar.gz >> mingw-runtime-3.3.tar.gz >> w32api-2.5.tar.gz >> >> Also I've configured environment due to ACE-INSTALL.html according >> MinGW compiler. OS: WinXP SP2. >> >> $ACE_ROOT=F:\ACE531 >> >> I get next compiling error: >> F:\ACE531\ace>gmake >> gmake.EXE[1]: Entering directory `F:/ACE531/ace' >> d:\Utils\Unix\diff.EXE: -: Invalid argument >> gmake.EXE[1]: Leaving directory `F:/ACE531/ace' >> gmake.EXE[1]: Entering directory `F:/ACE531/ace' >> d:/Utils/Unix/gmake.EXE -f Makefile.dirs SUBDIR_TARGET=all >> RMCast.subdir >> gmake.EXE[2]: Entering directory `F:/ACE531/ace' >> d:/Utils/Unix/gmake.EXE -f Makefile -C RMCast all >> gmake.EXE[3]: Entering directory `F:/ACE531/ace/RMCast' >> Installing libACE_RMCast.dll -> F:\ACE531/ace >> d:\Utils\Unix\cp.EXE: F:ACE531aceRMCast/libACE_RMCast.dll: No such >> file or directory >> Installing libACE_RMCa...

RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3) #2
Hi J.T., Right... The issue is a bit odd... Here's the check I added for ACE: dnl This check was added to work around a system-supplied header dnl (/usr/include/netinet/ip.h) that won't compile with Visual Age C++ dnl unless the _NO_BITFIELDS preprocessor macro is defined. The comments dnl there recommend use of _NO_BITFIELDS (and recode where needed to allow dnl that), but we won't just turn it on. Check to see if it's needed. Note dnl that this check is related to headers but done before we really know if dnl the header is present. Thus, if the bare compile fails, but succeeds dnl with _NO_BITFIELDS, set the flag, else leave things alone. -Steve -- Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation Adding Service to Open Source Software ACE book info at http://www.riverace.com/acebooks/ > -----Original Message----- > From: J.T. Conklin [mailto:jtc@acorntoolworks.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 2:21 PM > To: Colm McHugh > Cc: Steve Huston; ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: Re: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after > GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3) > > > Colm McHugh <cmchugh@callixa.com> writes: > >>Sure... Why do you say <sys/machine.h> is a prerequisite for > >><netinet/tcp.h>? I addressed a problem related to this in > the autoconf > >>support for AIX that'll go in the next beta, but it doesn't involve...

RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3) #2
Hi Colm, Ok, thanks for that explanation. I solved this a different way for a similar problem that showed up with Visual Age C++ on AIX 5.2... When the 5.4.5 beta comes out, please try this again and hopefully no further workarounds will be needed. Thanks, -Steve -- Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation Adding Service to Open Source Software ACE book info at http://www.riverace.com/acebooks/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Colm McHugh [mailto:cmchugh@callixa.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 1:05 PM > To: Steve Huston > Cc: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: Re: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after > GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3) > > > > >Sure... Why do you say <sys/machine.h> is a prerequisite for > ><netinet/tcp.h>? I addressed a problem related to this in > the autoconf > >support for AIX that'll go in the next beta, but it doesn't involve > >machine.h. > > > Hi Steve, > > that statement is based on the compilation sequence shown > below (done on > an AIX 5.2): > > $ cat t2.cpp > #include <sys/machine.h> > #include <netinet/tcp.h> > int main() > {} > $ g++ t2.cpp > $ cat t1.cpp > #include <netinet/tcp.h> > int main() > {} > $ g++ t1.cpp > In file incl...

[ace-users] Re: How can I use ACE(Latest Beta Kit) for AIX version 5.3/5.2 and VisualAge C++ 7.0/6.0 for AIX on machine IBM P690? \
Hi Oliana, Thanks very much for your email. Please make sure to send all questions related to TAO or ACE to the ACE mailing list or ACE+TAO newsgroup, rather than to me directly since I travel frequently and often don't have ready access to email. See http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE-mail.html for more info on how to access these resources. > I want to use ACE.tar.bz2(Latest Beta Kit) on AIX version 5.3,Now > I'm writing application program base on ACE.tar.bz2 (Latest Beta > Kit) and testing ACE.tar.bz2(Latest Beta Kit) on AIX version 5.2 for > IBM P690 and using VisualAge C++ 6.0 and VisualAge C++ 7.0,It?s very > strange ,the ACE.tar.bz2 was compiled successful,But the application > program can?t be compiled success,There are a lot of problems.It has > reported a lot of mistakes of STL head file in VisualAge ,and then > It told me there are something wrong in VisualAge C++ 6.0/7.0's head > file.I don't know why,Then ,I written testing code ,only have tested > VisualAge C++ 6.0 and VisualAge C++ 7.0 for AIX version 5.2's head > file already,the compiler was compiling and running up to snuff,no > mistake in head file.And you know ,When I put the same application > program and ACE.tar.bz2(Latest Beta Kit) in Redhatlinux for PC and > Turbo linux for IBM eServe BladeCenter, there are no mistakes,and > It?s normally compiling and running so fast.So,I don?t know why,what > happ...

Re: [ace-users] Errors while compiling c++ 3.4.2
Hi Eyal, I believe we've fixed these problems in the latest version of ACE that's tucked inside our CVS repository. Can you please take a look at this version available in http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html and see if things work better. If not, please let us know so we can fix them before we release ACE 5.4.3 in a week or so. Thanks, Doug >> I get the following while compiling: >> >> /usr/bin/c++ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199506L -DNDEBUG -DUSING_GCC >> -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -DLINUX -I../inc >> -I../3rd_party...

RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3)
Hi Tom, > > > The "resolution" was to upgrade to ACE-5.4.3 or later, which has > > > code fixes to help with the newer compiler. Not sure how > much would > > > need to change, but you may be able to inspect the differences in > > > that part of the code wrt the newer ACE release to backport the > > > fixes. > > Thanks, I've downloaded and am building. Is ACE-5.4.3 the latest > > production release ? > > Well, the definition of "production release" for ACE is a bit murky > imho. Production release is one with 2 numbers. E.g., 5.4 > The developers on this list (almost) always recommend using the > latest package, which is typically labeled a "beta release". > The latest > would be 5.4.4. The developers always recommend *not* using the > "production release", since the next release labeled "beta" > is always a bug-fix-only release. I believe I qualify as a "developer", but have a different take. Production releases are tested well, and often better than the BFO beta. There may be fixes in BFO, but there may be additional bugs also - it happened at 5.4.1. For those wishing to adopt a version of ACE and stick with it, you'll need a version you can get support (fixes and advice) for. For example, Riverace supports releases (e.g., 5.4) and fix kits that Riverace releases for those (i...

[ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3)
Hi Tom, > Well, the definition of "production release" for ACE is a bit murky > imho. Please see http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/docs/ACE-development-process.html for the canonical definition of terms. If there's something unclear there please let me know and I'll fixit. > The developers on this list (almost) always recommend using the > latest package, which is typically labeled a "beta release". Right, the reason we do that is because the "latest release" (which is most commonly a beta release) is the only thing the DOC group developers "support". > The latest would be 5.4.4. The developers always recommend *not* > using the "production release", since the next release labeled > "beta" is always a bug-fix-only release. So I usually use the x.x.1 > release (the BFO release) but would probably recommend using 5.4.4 > on any platform, as do the developers. I think you probably know this already, but for the benefit of others on the mailing list the DOC grou doesn't actually support *anything* officially for non-sponsors, i.e., our work is all on a "best effort or no effort at all" basis, as per the explanation in http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/docs/ACE-bug-process.html However, some companies like Riverace, OCI, PrismTech, etc. use our "official" (i.e., non-beta) releases as the basis f...

[ace-users] Errors while compiling c++ 3.4.2
I get the following while compiling: /usr/bin/c++ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199506L -DNDEBUG -DUSING_GCC -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -DLINUX -I../inc -I../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers -fPIC -pedantic -fno-for-scope -Wno-long-long -Wno-deprecated -o Trace.o.linux -c Trace.cpp In file included from .../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers/ace/Unbounded_Set.h:306, from ../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers/ace/Memory_Pool.h:30, from ../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers/ace/Malloc.h:414, from ../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers/ace/String_Base....

Re: [ace-users] compiling issue on Sun 5.8 with ACE 5.3 #2 #3
Hi, Are we still talking about ACE problems, looks now that you have a problem in your application code. What for code is in Global.h on line 43? Johnny "Manish Jain" <mjain@itangel.com> wrote in message news:<00a101c34b71$cbf5b110$5ec809c0@angels.com>... > Can you please also lookint to the following error as well: > > > Compiling /v/sbansal/out/temp/playground/ExecAgent.o > /opt/SUNWspro/bin/CC -temp=/v/sbansal/out/temp -g -c -Bdynamic -ldl > -mt -libr > ary=iostream,rwtools7 -DACE_HAS_EXCEPTIONS -o > /v/sbansal/out/temp/playground/Ex...

Re: [ace-bugs] Compilation error on SUSE 8.0, gcc 2.95.3 with ace 5.3.0 and latest version
Hi, Thanks for using the PRF. We build daily with SuSE 8.2 and GCC 3.3 and don't have problems. Try to set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to a full path for a test. I think you have to search the problem in the export of ACE_ROOT and LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT BV Leeghwaterstraat 25 2811 DT Reeuwijk The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl <jahb@lineone.net> wrote in message news:<3F216AC2000202DE@mk-cpfrontend-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com>... > ACE VERSION: > > 5.3.0 (and latest beta version) > > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: &g...

[ace-bug] Compile ACE 5.4 on AIX 5.2 with gcc 3.3.2
Failed to build ACE 5.4 on AIX 5.2 with gcc3.3.2 Used config-aix5.1.h and platform_aix_g++.GNU I failed with ACE5.1, 5.3 too, so I tried 5.4. Does anybody know IF it works ? Could it help to build my own AIX5.2 gcc ? (my gcc 3.3.2 is binary AIX 5.1 but it worked fine for Non-ACE- applications) Do I have to use IBM Visual C++ Compiler ? Any suggestions would be helpful. ACE VERSION: 5.4 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: RS/6000, 32-bit-kernel mode, AIX5.2 TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): ...

[ace-users] ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3)
[Apologies if this shows up twice, there was a mailer error with my first attempt to post] Hi, I found the same problem reported recently on the mailing list ("compiling ACE under Fedora core 3", March 1st) but no resolution was reported there, so I thought I'd post a full description here. ACE VERSION: 5.4 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: AIX 5.1 COMPILER: GNU GCC G++ 3.4.3 CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h: // config-aix5.1.h,v 1.5 2003/12/16 17:49:48 elliott_c Exp // // Config file for AIX 5.1 // This define is needed for building with Visual Age C++ 5 in incremental // mode. In the batch mode build, platform_aix_ibm.GNU sets it. The incremental // mode compiler won't be supported after ACE 5.3, so this will also go away // in that timeframe, so don't worry about future AIX versions. #if !defined (ACE_AIX_VE...

Re: [ace-users] Compiling ACE 5.3 with GCC 3.4.3
Hi, When x.3 was released there was no GCC 3.4 version, so this will just not work, please upgrade to a newer version of ACE/TAO. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl "Seng-Quee.Liang" <Seng-Quee.Liang@Sun.COM> wrote in message news:<mailman.1894.1170813530.25808.ace-users@mail.cse.wustl.edu>... > Hi, > > I'm a newbie to ACE and this is my 1st posting to this alias, and would > appreciate any help. > > I have a requirement to use ACE 5.3 on Solaris 10 SPARC. I had followed > the building & installation information on ACE website to the letter and > had no problems compiling it with Sun Studio 11. > > However, when I tried compiling it with GCC 3.4.3, I'm swamped with a > host of problems. Being a newbie to ACE, I'm wondering > > a) if I'm setting the right config.h/platform_macros.GNU for GCC > compile; > b) if I should be trying add flags into these files to get it to > compile. > > Any pointers or advice is sincerely appreciated. > > > Thanks in advance. > > Best Regards, > /SengQuee > > -------- config.h for Studio 11 ----- > #include "ace/config-sunos5.9.h" > > -------- platform_macros.GNU for Studio 11 ----- > include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU &...

[ace-users] Tests failed : ACE 5.5.2 - AIX 5.3
Hi, My first mail before my message in the group failed (my subscription was not activated). The PRF below describes my problems. I can compile and link but several ACE's tests fail. I only use ACE library and only compile it by cd'ing in the ace directory before running make. I already made some fixes described below to compile and to link the library. I'm not abble to interpret the faild tests to identify the problem source or area. I didn't find the scoreboard before my mail. I see that several tests fails for all compilations on AIX. I try to reassure myself by looking these results, it's not only for my configuration. But it's a daily build with last development version. For the 5.5.2 stable version they should probably not fail ? Regards, PO Houot. ACE VERSION: 5.5.2 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: bash-3.00$ uname -a AIX localhost 3 5 0040983B4C00 unknown unknown AIX bash-3.00$ oslevel -r 5300-05 TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: Same as host COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): bash-3.00$ g++ -v Using built-in specs. Target: powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0 Configured with: ../gcc-4.1.1/configure --disable-nls Thread model: aix gcc version 4.1.1 This compiler is installed from packages provided by UCLA AIX Software library THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h FILE : bash-3.00$ more $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h #include "ace/config-aix-5.x.h" T...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi Jin, Thanks for using the PRF. >> ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 >> >> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: >> Solaris 10 x86 >> >> TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: >> COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): >> Sun Studio 9 (Sun CC 5.6) As we've mentioned several times now, we don't have this compiler installed yet on this hardware platform, so if you want things to be fixed soon I recommend you figure out what's going wrong and send us the patches. Otherwise, pl...

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
> Ok. Steve, could you maybe make clear with the build names > which builds use explicit templates? I'll try to get this clarified. > Explicit templates in TAO are known to be broken at this > moment. None of the tests at Riverace try to build TAO. -Steve ...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi Jin, >> I rebuild the ACE package according the instruction above,but get >> the same result. It doesn't look to me like you've added -DACE_HAS_X86_STAT_MACROS to the build-line as recommended by Johnny Willemsen. >> my platform_macros.GNU file has the following lines: >> >> templates = implicit >> include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU >> >> When i rebuild the ACE library,get the following compile errors: >> $ make inline=0 -j 2 -k -f GNUmakefile.ACE >> ... >&...

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi Steve, > > Is this necessary? I mean make it implicit by default. The > > explicit is > > not even supported, and has no chance to work cleanly. Why > > should we patch > > broken stuff. Just a thought? > > At least for ACE 5.5, Riverace supports the Forte compiler that > requires explicit. After that, we can drop it. Ok. Steve, could you maybe make clear with the build names which builds use explicit templates? Explicit templates in TAO are known to be broken at this moment. Johnny ...

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi, > > > ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 > > > > > > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > > > Solaris10 X86 > > > TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: > > > COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): > > > Compiler: SUN CC 5.6 > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > I don't think the DOC group supports this compiler anymore.. More > particularly this compiler is buggy and you may land up with > unresolved > symbols even if you get past this pa...

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi, > > > I don't think the DOC group supports this compiler anymore.. More > > > particularly this compiler is buggy and you may land up with > > > unresolved > > > symbols even if you get past this part. > > > > I missed the compiler version. But, Forte 8 gives output of > SUN C++ 5.5. Ok, the problem is in platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU, when a not known forte version is found, it defaults to explicit. I am updating right now, for 4.2 and 5.3 we default to explicit, for all others to implicit Qinghuajin and other Forte...

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi, > >> It's almost up. There are some issues with installing software as > >> we don't have the media in a compatible form yet. We also don't > >> have Sun CC, and we need to purchase a licence if we need to > >> support Sun CC. > > Ok, that's fine - thanks for the update. I think some other folks > (e.g., LMCO ATL and Remedy) have Solaris 9/10 and Sun CC, so we may > not need to worry about running Sun CC on our machine. Johnny/Gautam, > can you folks please confirm/deny whether you've got Sun CC on Solar...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Johnny- > Ok, the problem is in platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU, when a not known forte > version is found, it defaults to explicit. I am updating right now, for 4.2 > and 5.3 we default to explicit, for all others to implicit Is this necessary? I mean make it implicit by default. The explicit is not even supported, and has no chance to work cleanly. Why should we patch broken stuff. Just a thought? > Qinghuajin and other Forte 9 users, you can work around this by added the > following line to your platform_macros.GNU file. > templates = implicit This is until w...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi > > ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 > > > > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > > Solaris10 X86 > > TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: > > COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): > > Compiler: SUN CC 5.6 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I don't think the DOC group supports this compiler anymore.. More particularly this compiler is buggy and you may land up with unresolved symbols even if you get past this part. My $0.02. Thanks Bala > > Make: ...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Johnny- > > > > ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 > > > > > > > > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > > > > Solaris10 X86 > > > > TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: > > > > COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): > > > > Compiler: SUN CC 5.6 > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > I don't think the DOC group supports this compiler anymore.. More > > particularly this compiler is buggy and you may land up with ...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi Everyon: My SunBlade 150 is back up and available, and has a Sun CC license, though I don't have a lot of bandwidth to admin it. Bala know where it is and has the root password. I'll probably move it into the server room once I have a chance to talk to Dan about it, but I my be out of town this week. [dhinton@blade DRM]$ uname -a SunOS blade 5.9 Generic_112233-03 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-100 Solaris [dhinton@blade DRM]$ CC -V CC: Forte Developer 7 C++ 5.4 2002/03/09 [dhinton@blade DRM]$ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 3.4.2 Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, ...

Web resources about - RE: [ace-users] ACE 5.3 - TAO 1.3 on AIX 5.3 with compiler Visual Age Version 7.0 #2 - comp.soft-sys.ace

Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 User Reviews
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 reviews written by Phone Arena users. You can read the opinion of each user and how they rate the phone in 11 categories. ...

Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 official: iPhone-alike size for the new user
Samsung has revealed another in its Galaxy series, the Galaxy Ace 3, now targeting entry-level smartphone users who want a pocket-friendly 4-inch ...

Resources last updated: 3/5/2016 12:16:51 PM