RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3) #2
Hi Colm, Ok, thanks for that explanation. I solved this a different way for a similar problem that showed up with Visual Age C++ on AIX 5.2... When the 5.4.5 beta comes out, please try this again and hopefully no further workarounds will be needed. Thanks, -Steve -- Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation Adding Service to Open Source Software ACE book info at http://www.riverace.com/acebooks/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Colm McHugh [mailto:cmchugh@callixa.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 1:05 PM > To: Steve Huston > Cc: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: Re: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after > GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3) > > > > >Sure... Why do you say <sys/machine.h> is a prerequisite for > ><netinet/tcp.h>? I addressed a problem related to this in > the autoconf > >support for AIX that'll go in the next beta, but it doesn't involve > >machine.h. > > > Hi Steve, > > that statement is based on the compilation sequence shown > below (done on > an AIX 5.2): > > $ cat t2.cpp > #include <sys/machine.h> > #include <netinet/tcp.h> > int main() > {} > $ g++ t2.cpp > $ cat t1.cpp > #include <netinet/tcp.h> > int main() > {} > $ g++ t1.cpp > In file incl...

RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3) #2
Hi J.T., Right... The issue is a bit odd... Here's the check I added for ACE: dnl This check was added to work around a system-supplied header dnl (/usr/include/netinet/ip.h) that won't compile with Visual Age C++ dnl unless the _NO_BITFIELDS preprocessor macro is defined. The comments dnl there recommend use of _NO_BITFIELDS (and recode where needed to allow dnl that), but we won't just turn it on. Check to see if it's needed. Note dnl that this check is related to headers but done before we really know if dnl the header is present. Thus, if the bare compile fails, but succeeds dnl with _NO_BITFIELDS, set the flag, else leave things alone. -Steve -- Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation Adding Service to Open Source Software ACE book info at http://www.riverace.com/acebooks/ > -----Original Message----- > From: J.T. Conklin [mailto:jtc@acorntoolworks.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 2:21 PM > To: Colm McHugh > Cc: Steve Huston; ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: Re: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after > GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3) > > > Colm McHugh <cmchugh@callixa.com> writes: > >>Sure... Why do you say <sys/machine.h> is a prerequisite for > >><netinet/tcp.h>? I addressed a problem related to this in > the autoconf > >>support for AIX that'll go in the next beta, but it doesn't involve...

RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3)
Hi Tom, > > > The "resolution" was to upgrade to ACE-5.4.3 or later, which has > > > code fixes to help with the newer compiler. Not sure how > much would > > > need to change, but you may be able to inspect the differences in > > > that part of the code wrt the newer ACE release to backport the > > > fixes. > > Thanks, I've downloaded and am building. Is ACE-5.4.3 the latest > > production release ? > > Well, the definition of "production release" for ACE is a bit murky > imho. Production release is one with 2 numbers. E.g., 5.4 > The developers on this list (almost) always recommend using the > latest package, which is typically labeled a "beta release". > The latest > would be 5.4.4. The developers always recommend *not* using the > "production release", since the next release labeled "beta" > is always a bug-fix-only release. I believe I qualify as a "developer", but have a different take. Production releases are tested well, and often better than the BFO beta. There may be fixes in BFO, but there may be additional bugs also - it happened at 5.4.1. For those wishing to adopt a version of ACE and stick with it, you'll need a version you can get support (fixes and advice) for. For example, Riverace supports releases (e.g., 5.4) and fix kits that Riverace releases for those (i...

[ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3)
Hi Tom, > Well, the definition of "production release" for ACE is a bit murky > imho. Please see http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/docs/ACE-development-process.html for the canonical definition of terms. If there's something unclear there please let me know and I'll fixit. > The developers on this list (almost) always recommend using the > latest package, which is typically labeled a "beta release". Right, the reason we do that is because the "latest release" (which is most commonly a beta release) is the only thing the DOC group developers "support". > The latest would be 5.4.4. The developers always recommend *not* > using the "production release", since the next release labeled > "beta" is always a bug-fix-only release. So I usually use the x.x.1 > release (the BFO release) but would probably recommend using 5.4.4 > on any platform, as do the developers. I think you probably know this already, but for the benefit of others on the mailing list the DOC grou doesn't actually support *anything* officially for non-sponsors, i.e., our work is all on a "best effort or no effort at all" basis, as per the explanation in http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/docs/ACE-bug-process.html However, some companies like Riverace, OCI, PrismTech, etc. use our "official" (i.e., non-beta) releases as the basis f...

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi, > > > ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 > > > > > > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > > > Solaris10 X86 > > > TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: > > > COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): > > > Compiler: SUN CC 5.6 > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > I don't think the DOC group supports this compiler anymore.. More > particularly this compiler is buggy and you may land up with > unresolved > symbols even if you get past this part. I missed the compiler version. But, Forte 8 gives output of SUN C++ 5.5. Maybe we should add a check to one of the Sun config file to check the SUN CC version? Something like: // Forte 6 is the oldest Forte version we sopport #if __SUNPRO_CC < 0x530 # error Your SUN CC compiler is too old, upgrade to a newer version #endif Johnny ...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi Jin, Thanks for using the PRF. >> ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 >> >> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: >> Solaris 10 x86 >> >> TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: >> COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): >> Sun Studio 9 (Sun CC 5.6) As we've mentioned several times now, we don't have this compiler installed yet on this hardware platform, so if you want things to be fixed soon I recommend you figure out what's going wrong and send us the patches. Otherwise, please contact one of the companies that provides commercial support for ACE at http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/commercial-support.html Thanks, Doug >> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h [if you use a link to a >> platform- >> specific file, simply state which one]: >> >> #define ACE_HAS_STANDARD_CPP_LIBRARY 1 >> #define ACE_USES_STD_NAMESPACE_FOR_STDCPP_LIB 1 >> >> #include "ace/config-sunos5.9.h" >> >> >> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU >> (unless >> this isn't used in this case, e.g., with Microsoft Visual C++): >> >> templates = implicit >> include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU >> >> >> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/bin/MakeP...

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
> > Ok, the problem is in platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU, when a > not known forte > > version is found, it defaults to explicit. I am updating > right now, for 4.2 > > and 5.3 we default to explicit, for all others to implicit This sounds good. > Is this necessary? I mean make it implicit by default. The > explicit is > not even supported, and has no chance to work cleanly. Why > should we patch > broken stuff. Just a thought? At least for ACE 5.5, Riverace supports the Forte compiler that requires explicit. After that, we can drop it. Thanks, -Steve ...

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi Steve, > > Is this necessary? I mean make it implicit by default. The > > explicit is > > not even supported, and has no chance to work cleanly. Why > > should we patch > > broken stuff. Just a thought? > > At least for ACE 5.5, Riverace supports the Forte compiler that > requires explicit. After that, we can drop it. Ok. Steve, could you maybe make clear with the build names which builds use explicit templates? Explicit templates in TAO are known to be broken at this moment. Johnny ...

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi, > >> It's almost up. There are some issues with installing software as > >> we don't have the media in a compatible form yet. We also don't > >> have Sun CC, and we need to purchase a licence if we need to > >> support Sun CC. > > Ok, that's fine - thanks for the update. I think some other folks > (e.g., LMCO ATL and Remedy) have Solaris 9/10 and Sun CC, so we may > not need to worry about running Sun CC on our machine. Johnny/Gautam, > can you folks please confirm/deny whether you've got Sun CC on Solaris > 9/10? We are running SunCC (Forte 8) on Solaris 8. We have Solaris 9 available, but have had no time to install it on our build system. Johnny ...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Johnny- > > > > ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 > > > > > > > > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > > > > Solaris10 X86 > > > > TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: > > > > COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): > > > > Compiler: SUN CC 5.6 > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > I don't think the DOC group supports this compiler anymore.. More > > particularly this compiler is buggy and you may land up with > > unresolved > > symbols even if you get past this part. > > I missed the compiler version. But, Forte 8 gives output of SUN C++ 5.5. Hmm.. Then I could be wrong. Then we need to fix the config files for SUN CC to use implicit templates for anything including and above FORTE 8. > Maybe we should add a check to one of the Sun config file to check the SUN > CC version? Something like: > > // Forte 6 is the oldest Forte version we sopport > #if __SUNPRO_CC < 0x530 > # error Your SUN CC compiler is too old, upgrade to a newer version > #endif Much better. Thanks Bala ...

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi, > > Ok, the problem is in platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU, when a > not known forte > > version is found, it defaults to explicit. I am updating > right now, for 4.2 > > and 5.3 we default to explicit, for all others to implicit > > Is this necessary? I mean make it implicit by default. The > explicit is > not even supported, and has no chance to work cleanly. Why > should we patch > broken stuff. Just a thought? I have thought also about this, but maybe there are users around we don't know if. We can drop all this after x.5 is released, until that time, I just keep it there, just as we have a lot of other stuff that is probably broken. > > Qinghuajin and other Forte 9 users, you can work around > this by added the > > following line to your platform_macros.GNU file. > > templates = implicit > > This is until we release x.4.4., right? Yes, with x.4.4 this will be done correctly. Johnny ...

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
> Ok. Steve, could you maybe make clear with the build names > which builds use explicit templates? I'll try to get this clarified. > Explicit templates in TAO are known to be broken at this > moment. None of the tests at Riverace try to build TAO. -Steve ...

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi, > > > I don't think the DOC group supports this compiler anymore.. More > > > particularly this compiler is buggy and you may land up with > > > unresolved > > > symbols even if you get past this part. > > > > I missed the compiler version. But, Forte 8 gives output of > SUN C++ 5.5. Ok, the problem is in platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU, when a not known forte version is found, it defaults to explicit. I am updating right now, for 4.2 and 5.3 we default to explicit, for all others to implicit Qinghuajin and other Forte 9 users, you can work around this by added the following line to your platform_macros.GNU file. templates = implicit Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Leeghwaterstraat 25 2811 DT Reeuwijk The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl ...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi Everyon: My SunBlade 150 is back up and available, and has a Sun CC license, though I don't have a lot of bandwidth to admin it. Bala know where it is and has the root password. I'll probably move it into the server room once I have a chance to talk to Dan about it, but I my be out of town this week. [dhinton@blade DRM]$ uname -a SunOS blade 5.9 Generic_112233-03 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-100 Solaris [dhinton@blade DRM]$ CC -V CC: Forte Developer 7 C++ 5.4 2002/03/09 [dhinton@blade DRM]$ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 3.4.2 Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. take care... don On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, Krishnakumar B wrote: > On Sunday, 02 January 2005, Douglas C. Schmidt wrote: > > Hi, > > > >>> ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 > > > > Thakns for using the PRF! > > > >>> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > >>> Solaris10 X86 > > > > We (i.e., the DOC groups at UCI/VU/WU) don't have Solaris running on > > an x86 box (yet). It would therefore be great if you could figure out > > what patches need to be applied so that ACE compiles properly on this > > platform. > > > > BTW, Kitty/Bala, weren't we planning on running Solaris on an AMD box > > ...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi Jin, >> I rebuild the ACE package according the instruction above,but get >> the same result. It doesn't look to me like you've added -DACE_HAS_X86_STAT_MACROS to the build-line as recommended by Johnny Willemsen. >> my platform_macros.GNU file has the following lines: >> >> templates = implicit >> include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU >> >> When i rebuild the ACE library,get the following compile errors: >> $ make inline=0 -j 2 -k -f GNUmakefile.ACE >> ... >> ... >> >> CC -mt -g -DSUN_CC_HAS_PVFC_BUG >> -I/export/home/hua/DevTools/ACE_wrappers -DACE_HAS_EXCEPTIONS >> -DACE_NO_INLINE -I.. -DACE_HAS_ACE_TOKEN -DACE_HAS_ACE_SVCCONF >> -DACE_BUILD_DLL -c -KPIC -o .shobj/OS_NS_sys_stat.o >> OS_NS_sys_stat.cpp >> "/export/home/hua/DevTools/ACE_wrappers/ace/OS_NS_sys_stat.inl", line >> 37: Error: fstat(int, stat*) is not a member of ACE_OS. >> "/export/home/hua/DevTools/ACE_wrappers/ace/OS_NS_sys_stat.inl", line >> 120: Error: fstat is not a member of ACE_OS. >> "/export/home/hua/DevTools/ACE_wrappers/ace/OS_NS_sys_stat.inl", line >> 142: Error: "ACE_OS::lstat(const char*, stat*)" was previously >> declared "ACE_OS::lstat(const wchar_t*, stat*)". >> "/export/home/hua/DevTools/ACE_wrappers/...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi > > ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 > > > > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > > Solaris10 X86 > > TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: > > COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): > > Compiler: SUN CC 5.6 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I don't think the DOC group supports this compiler anymore.. More particularly this compiler is buggy and you may land up with unresolved symbols even if you get past this part. My $0.02. Thanks Bala > > Make: GNU make 3.80 > > > > CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h [if you use a link to a > > platform- > > specific file, simply state which one]: > > #include "ace/config-sunos5.9.h" > > > > CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU > > (unless > > this isn't used in this case, e.g., with Microsoft Visual C++): > > include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU > > > > > > CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/bin/MakeProjectCreator/config/default.features > > (used by MPC when you generate your own makefiles): > > > > AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: > > [What example failed? What module failed to compile?] > > "ace/OS_NS_sys_stat.cpp" > > > > DOES THE ...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Johnny- > Ok, the problem is in platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU, when a not known forte > version is found, it defaults to explicit. I am updating right now, for 4.2 > and 5.3 we default to explicit, for all others to implicit Is this necessary? I mean make it implicit by default. The explicit is not even supported, and has no chance to work cleanly. Why should we patch broken stuff. Just a thought? > Qinghuajin and other Forte 9 users, you can work around this by added the > following line to your platform_macros.GNU file. > templates = implicit This is until we release x.4.4., right? Thanks Bala ...

[ace-users] ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3)
[Apologies if this shows up twice, there was a mailer error with my first attempt to post] Hi, I found the same problem reported recently on the mailing list ("compiling ACE under Fedora core 3", March 1st) but no resolution was reported there, so I thought I'd post a full description here. ACE VERSION: 5.4 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: AIX 5.1 COMPILER: GNU GCC G++ 3.4.3 CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h: // config-aix5.1.h,v 1.5 2003/12/16 17:49:48 elliott_c Exp // // Config file for AIX 5.1 // This define is needed for building with Visual Age C++ 5 in incremental // mode. In the batch mode build, platform_aix_ibm.GNU sets it. The incremental // mode compiler won't be supported after ACE 5.3, so this will also go away // in that timeframe, so don't worry about future AIX versions. #if !defined (ACE_AIX_VE...

[ace-users] Re: Error while ACE 5.3.1 or 5.4.1 compiling and installing by MinGW 3.3.3
Hi Vitaly, Please upgrade to ACE 5.4.4, which you can download from http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html since I think that is more likely to work with MinGW 3.3.3. Johnny, can you confirm/deny this please? Thanks, Doug >> Hi, >> I have installed MinGW packages: >> >> binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1.tar.gz >> gcc-core-3.3.3-20040217-1.tar.gz >> gcc-g++-3.3.3-20040217-1.tar.gz >> mingw-runtime-3.3.tar.gz >> w32api-2.5.tar.gz >> >> Also I've configured environment due to ACE-INSTALL.html according >> MinGW compiler. OS: WinXP SP2. >> >> $ACE_ROOT=F:\ACE531 >> >> I get next compiling error: >> F:\ACE531\ace>gmake >> gmake.EXE[1]: Entering directory `F:/ACE531/ace' >> d:\Utils\Unix\diff.EXE: -: Invalid argument >> gmake.EXE[1]: Leaving directory `F:/ACE531/ace' >> gmake.EXE[1]: Entering directory `F:/ACE531/ace' >> d:/Utils/Unix/gmake.EXE -f Makefile.dirs SUBDIR_TARGET=all >> RMCast.subdir >> gmake.EXE[2]: Entering directory `F:/ACE531/ace' >> d:/Utils/Unix/gmake.EXE -f Makefile -C RMCast all >> gmake.EXE[3]: Entering directory `F:/ACE531/ace/RMCast' >> Installing libACE_RMCast.dll -> F:\ACE531/ace >> d:\Utils\Unix\cp.EXE: F:ACE531aceRMCast/libACE_RMCast.dll: No such >> file or directory >> Installing libACE_RMCa...

[ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86
Hi Jin, >> The solaris 9/10 for sparc is not the same as solaris 9/10 for >> Intel X86,although it is almost free,and the SunStudio 9 (CC >> 5.6)for sparc is not the same as SunStudio 9(CC 5.6) for Intel X86. This is yet one more reason why you'll need to do the legwork on this. Please let us know what you find out. Thanks, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt, Professor TEL: (615) 343-8197 Electrical Engineering and Computer Science FAX: (615) 343-7440 Vanderbilt University WEB: www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ Nashville, TN 37203 NET: d.schmidt@vanderbilt.edu ...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86
Hi, >> ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 Thakns for using the PRF! >> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: >> Solaris10 X86 We (i.e., the DOC groups at UCI/VU/WU) don't have Solaris running on an x86 box (yet). It would therefore be great if you could figure out what patches need to be applied so that ACE compiles properly on this platform. BTW, Kitty/Bala, weren't we planning on running Solaris on an AMD box at some point? Thanks, Doug >> TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: >> COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): >> Compiler: SUN CC 5.6 >> Make: GNU make 3.80 >> >> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h [if you use a link to a >> platform- >> specific file, simply state which one]: >> #include "ace/config-sunos5.9.h" >> >> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU >> (unless >> this isn't used in this case, e.g., with Microsoft Visual C++): >> include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU >> >> >> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/bin/MakeProjectCreator/config/default.features >> (used by MPC when you generate your own makefiles): >> >> AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: >> [What example failed? What module failed to com...

RE: [ace-users] ACE 5.3
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01BC_01C5D46D.2EF26B10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Praveen, =20 Riverace will have an AIX 5.3/Visual Age 7 machine running next week. We have a sponsor for porting ACE 5.4 to the platform. If you'd like to sponsor us porting back to ACE 5.3, please let me know. =20 Best regards, =20 -Steve -- Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation "How to Use ACE Effectively" class Oct 17-19! See http://www.riverace.com/training.htm -----Original Message----- From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Praveen Kumar Gulati Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 3:08 AM To: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu Subject: [ace-users] ACE 5.3 - TAO 1.3 on AIX 5.3 with compiler Visual Age Version 7.0 Hi I am trying to build ACE 5.3 - TAO 1.3 on AIX 5.3 with compiler Visual Age Version 7.0. Do you already know some issues in above combination?=20 Whether some one is already using above combination? Regards Praveen Gulati ------=_NextPart_000_01BC_01C5D46D.2EF26B10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; = charset=3Dus-ascii&q...

RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4 compilation error on HP-UX 11.11/GNU g++ 3.4.3
The needed fix is, indeed, in ACE 5.5. If, for some reason, you need to stay on 5.4, the 5.4e Fix Kit from Riverace has this problem fixed as well. The fix is needed for g++ 3.4 on any platform. -Steve -- Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation Helping you succeed with ACE See http://www.riverace.com/support.htm > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu > [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas C. Schmidt > Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 7:01 PM > To: ecoboja@yahoo.com; ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4 compilation error on HP-UX > 11.11/GNU g++ 3.4.3 > > > Hi, > > Thanks for using the PRF. > > >> ACE VERSION: 5.4 > > Please upgrade to ACE 5.5, which you can download from > > http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html > > The DOC groups at Washington University, UC Irvine, and Vanderbilt > University only provide "best effort" support for non-sponsors for the > latest release, as described in > > http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/docs/ACE-bug-pro > cess.html > > Thus, if you need more "predictable" help for ACE 5.4, I recommend > that you check out > >...

[ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi,all I rebuild the ACE package according the instruction above,but get the same result. my platform_macros.GNU file has the following lines: templates = implicit include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU When i rebuild the ACE library,get the following compile errors: $ make inline=0 -j 2 -k -f GNUmakefile.ACE .... .... CC -mt -g -DSUN_CC_HAS_PVFC_BUG -I/export/home/hua/DevTools/ACE_wrappers -DACE_HAS_EXCEPTIONS -DACE_NO_INLINE -I.. -DACE_HAS_ACE_TOKEN -DACE_HAS_ACE_SVCCONF -DACE_BUILD_DLL -c -KPIC -o .shobj/OS_NS_sys_stat.o OS_NS_sys_stat.cpp "/export/home/hua/DevTools/ACE_wrappers/ace/OS_NS_sys_stat.inl", line 37: Error: fstat(int, stat*) is not a member of ACE_OS. "/export/home/hua/DevTools/ACE_wrappers/ace/OS_NS_sys_stat.inl", line 120: Error: fstat is not a member of ACE_OS. "/export/home/hua/DevTools/ACE_wrappers/ace/OS_NS_sys_stat.inl", line 142: Error: "ACE_OS::lstat(const char*, stat*)" was previously declared "ACE_OS::lstat(const wchar_t*, stat*)". "/export/home/hua/DevTools/ACE_wrappers/ace/OS_NS_sys_stat.inl", line 163: Error: Formal argument file of type const wchar_t* in call to ACE_OS::lstat(const wchar_t*, stat*) is being passed char*. 4 Error(s) detected. CC -mt -g -DSUN_CC_HAS_PVFC_BUG -I/export/home/hua/DevTools/ACE_wrappers -DACE_HAS_EXCEPTIONS -DACE_NO_INLINE -I.. -DACE_HAS_ACE_TOKEN -DACE_HAS_ACE_SVCCONF -DACE_BUILD_...

[ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi, ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: Solaris 10 x86 TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): Sun Studio 9 (Sun CC 5.6) CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h [if you use a link to a platform- specific file, simply state which one]: #define ACE_HAS_STANDARD_CPP_LIBRARY 1 #define ACE_USES_STD_NAMESPACE_FOR_STDCPP_LIB 1 #include "ace/config-sunos5.9.h" CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU (unless this isn't used in this case, e.g., with Microsoft Visual C++): templates = implicit include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/bin/MakeProjectCreator/config/default.features (used by MPC when you generate your own makefiles): AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: [What example failed? What module failed to compile?] ACE library compile failed. DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT: COMPILATION? Yes LINKING? Yes On Unix systems, did you run make realclean first? Yes EXECUTION? Yes OTHER (please specify)? [Please indicate whether ACE, your application, or both are affected.] SYNOPSIS: [Brief description of the problem] Some files still failed to compiled.The comiler pointed out that fstat and uname is not a member of ACE_OS. DESCRIPTION: [Det...