f



RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3)

Hi Tom,

> > > The "resolution" was to upgrade to ACE-5.4.3 or later, which has
> > > code fixes to help with the newer compiler. Not sure how 
> much would
> > > need to change, but you may be able to inspect the differences
in
> > > that part of the code wrt the newer ACE release to backport the
> > > fixes.
> >  Thanks, I've downloaded and am building. Is ACE-5.4.3 the latest
> >  production release ?
> 
> Well, the definition of "production release" for ACE is a bit murky 
> imho.

Production release is one with 2 numbers. E.g., 5.4

> The developers on this list (almost) always recommend using the 
> latest package, which is typically labeled a "beta release". 
> The latest 
> would be 5.4.4. The developers always recommend *not* using the 
> "production release", since the next release labeled "beta" 
> is always a bug-fix-only release.

I believe I qualify as a "developer", but have a different take.
Production releases are tested well, and often better than the BFO
beta. There may be fixes in BFO, but there may be additional bugs also
- it happened at 5.4.1.

For those wishing to adopt a version of ACE and stick with it, you'll
need a version you can get support (fixes and advice) for. For
example, Riverace supports releases (e.g., 5.4) and fix kits that
Riverace releases for those (i.e, 5.4a and 5.4b in the 5.4 series).
This allows project teams to stick with a stable ACE API and feature
set and still get the fixes needed.

> So I usually use the x.x.1 release (the BFO 
> release) but would probably recommend using 5.4.4 on any 
> platform, as do the developers.

This works for many people. There is, however, a risk involved. This
email exchange is an illustration of it - once you pick a beta (even
the BFO), the recommended way to get fixes (other than fixing it
yourself) is to go to the latest beta and hope someone has fixed the
problem you're seeing, and hasn't introduced some other problem. This
is too much risk for many projects to take on.

> >  Also, as an FYI, the header file <sys/machine.h> is a
pre-requisite
> >  for <netinet/tcp.h> on AIX 5.2. The configure.ac file may 
> need to be
> >  updated to reflect this.
> 
> I'm not familiar with the autoconf build style for ACE. 
> Perhaps someone else on-list can address this?

Sure... Why do you say <sys/machine.h> is a prerequisite for
<netinet/tcp.h>? I addressed a problem related to this in the autoconf
support for AIX that'll go in the next beta, but it doesn't involve
machine.h.

Thanks,

-Steve

--
Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation
Adding Service to Open Source Software
ACE book info at http://www.riverace.com/acebooks/



0
Steve
4/12/2005 9:54:56 PM
comp.soft-sys.ace 20326 articles. 1 followers. marlow.andrew (167) is leader. Post Follow

2 Replies
2691 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 5

>Sure... Why do you say <sys/machine.h> is a prerequisite for
><netinet/tcp.h>? I addressed a problem related to this in the autoconf
>support for AIX that'll go in the next beta, but it doesn't involve
>machine.h.
>
Hi Steve,

that statement is based on the compilation sequence shown below (done on 
an AIX 5.2):

$ cat t2.cpp
#include <sys/machine.h>
#include <netinet/tcp.h> 
int main()
{}
$ g++ t2.cpp
$ cat t1.cpp
#include <netinet/tcp.h>
int main()
{}
$ g++ t1.cpp
In file included from /usr/include/netinet/tcp.h:78,
                 from t1.cpp:1:
/usr/include/netinet/ip.h:119: error: declaration of `int 
ip_firstfour::<anonymous union>::<anonymous struct>::ip_xhl'
/usr/include/netinet/ip.h:114: error: conflicts with previous 
declaration `unsigned int ip_firstfour::<anonymous union>::<anonymous 
struct>::ip_xhl'
/usr/include/netinet/ip.h:120: error: declaration of `int 
ip_firstfour::<anonymous union>::<anonymous struct>::ip_xv'
/usr/include/netinet/ip.h:113: error: conflicts with previous 
declaration `unsigned int ip_firstfour::<anonymous union>::<anonymous 
struct>::ip_xv'
/usr/include/netinet/ip.h:121: error: declaration of `int 
ip_firstfour::<anonymous union>::<anonymous struct>::ip_xtos'
/usr/include/netinet/ip.h:115: error: conflicts with previous 
declaration `unsigned int ip_firstfour::<anonymous union>::<anonymous 
struct>::ip_xtos'
/usr/include/netinet/ip.h:122: error: declaration of `int 
ip_firstfour::<anonymous union>::<anonymous struct>::ip_xlen'
/usr/include/netinet/ip.h:116: error: conflicts with previous 
declaration `unsigned int ip_firstfour::<anonymous union>::<anonymous 
struct>::ip_xlen'
$
I experienced the same error when trying to build ACE after running 
configure, and I changed an ACE header file (can't remember which one) 
to include machine.h, and then it compiled.

Thanks,
Colm.

0
Colm
4/13/2005 5:11:57 PM
Colm McHugh <cmchugh@callixa.com> writes:
>>Sure... Why do you say <sys/machine.h> is a prerequisite for
>><netinet/tcp.h>? I addressed a problem related to this in the autoconf
>>support for AIX that'll go in the next beta, but it doesn't involve
>>machine.h.
>>
> Hi Steve,
>
> that statement is based on the compilation sequence shown below (done
> on an AIX 5.2):

I wonder whether we should use something other than <sys/machine.h>
--- maybe <sys/types.h>, <sys/socket.h>, or <netinet/in.h>.  Something
that is more likely to be present on other systems, but defines what's
needed or implicitly #includes <sys/machine.h> on AIX.

A little googling for AIX and netinet/tcp.h shows a lot of autoconf-
based packages complaining about AIX's lack of a idempotent netinet/
tcp.h header.  One in particular is the neon HTTP/WebDAV library,
which has fixed this by including <netinet/in.h> before including
<netinet/tcp.h> in the autoconf test.

    --jtc

-- 
J.T. Conklin

0
jtc
4/13/2005 6:29:37 PM
Reply:

Similar Artilces:

Re: [ace-users] Compiling ACE 5.3 with GCC 3.4.3
Hi, When x.3 was released there was no GCC 3.4 version, so this will just not work, please upgrade to a newer version of ACE/TAO. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl "Seng-Quee.Liang" <Seng-Quee.Liang@Sun.COM> wrote in message news:<mailman.1894.1170813530.25808.ace-users@mail.cse.wustl.edu>... > Hi, > > I'm a newbie to ACE and this is my 1st posting to this alias, and would > appreciate any help. > > I have a requirement to use ACE 5.3 on Solaris 10 SPARC. I had followed > the building & installation information on ACE website to the letter and > had no problems compiling it with Sun Studio 11. > > However, when I tried compiling it with GCC 3.4.3, I'm swamped with a > host of problems. Being a newbie to ACE, I'm wondering > > a) if I'm setting the right config.h/platform_macros.GNU for GCC > compile; > b) if I should be trying add flags into these files to get it to > compile. > > Any pointers or advice is sincerely appreciated. > > > Thanks in advance. > > Best Regards, > /SengQuee > > -------- config.h for Studio 11 ----- > #include "ace/config-sunos5.9.h" > > -------- platform_macros.GNU for Studio 11 ----- > include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU &...

[ace-users] Re: Error while ACE 5.3.1 or 5.4.1 compiling and installing by MinGW 3.3.3
Hi Vitaly, Please upgrade to ACE 5.4.4, which you can download from http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html since I think that is more likely to work with MinGW 3.3.3. Johnny, can you confirm/deny this please? Thanks, Doug >> Hi, >> I have installed MinGW packages: >> >> binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1.tar.gz >> gcc-core-3.3.3-20040217-1.tar.gz >> gcc-g++-3.3.3-20040217-1.tar.gz >> mingw-runtime-3.3.tar.gz >> w32api-2.5.tar.gz >> >> Also I've configured environment due to ACE-INSTALL.html according >> MinGW compiler. OS: WinXP SP2. >> >> $ACE_ROOT=F:\ACE531 >> >> I get next compiling error: >> F:\ACE531\ace>gmake >> gmake.EXE[1]: Entering directory `F:/ACE531/ace' >> d:\Utils\Unix\diff.EXE: -: Invalid argument >> gmake.EXE[1]: Leaving directory `F:/ACE531/ace' >> gmake.EXE[1]: Entering directory `F:/ACE531/ace' >> d:/Utils/Unix/gmake.EXE -f Makefile.dirs SUBDIR_TARGET=all >> RMCast.subdir >> gmake.EXE[2]: Entering directory `F:/ACE531/ace' >> d:/Utils/Unix/gmake.EXE -f Makefile -C RMCast all >> gmake.EXE[3]: Entering directory `F:/ACE531/ace/RMCast' >> Installing libACE_RMCast.dll -> F:\ACE531/ace >> d:\Utils\Unix\cp.EXE: F:ACE531aceRMCast/libACE_RMCast.dll: No such >> file or directory >> Installing libACE_RMCa...

Re: [ace-users] Errors while compiling c++ 3.4.2
Hi Eyal, I believe we've fixed these problems in the latest version of ACE that's tucked inside our CVS repository. Can you please take a look at this version available in http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html and see if things work better. If not, please let us know so we can fix them before we release ACE 5.4.3 in a week or so. Thanks, Doug >> I get the following while compiling: >> >> /usr/bin/c++ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199506L -DNDEBUG -DUSING_GCC >> -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -DLINUX -I../inc >> -I../3rd_party...

Re: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4 compiling problems with g++ 3.4.3
Hi > First, please use the problem-report-form when asking questions. ACE 5.4 is > not supported with newer GCC versions. All these issues are resolved in the > upcoming x.4.3 release. > > For the time being, try to add the following to your config.h > > # if (__GNUC__ > 3 || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 4)) > # define ACE_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_DESTRUCTOR_TAKES_ARGS > # endif /* __GNUC__ >= 3.4 */ > > You are correct, the download link doesn't work. Bala, do you have an idea > what is happening with the downlo...

[ace-users] Compiling ACE 5.3 with GCC 3.4.3
Hi, I'm a newbie to ACE and this is my 1st posting to this alias, and would appreciate any help. I have a requirement to use ACE 5.3 on Solaris 10 SPARC. I had followed the building & installation information on ACE website to the letter and had no problems compiling it with Sun Studio 11. However, when I tried compiling it with GCC 3.4.3, I'm swamped with a host of problems. Being a newbie to ACE, I'm wondering a) if I'm setting the right config.h/platform_macros.GNU for GCC compile; b) if I should be trying add flags into these files to get it to compile. Any pointers or advice is sincerely appreciated. Thanks in advance. Best Regards, /SengQuee -------- config.h for Studio 11 ----- #include "ace/config-sunos5.9.h" -------- platform_macros.GNU for Studio 11 ----- include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU -------- config.h for GCC 3.4.3 -------- #include "ace/config-sunos5.4-g++.h" -------- platform_macros.GNU for GCC 3.4.3 --------- include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_sunos5_g++.GNU --------- Compilation output with GCC ------------------------------ gmake[1]: Entering directory `/export/sw-images/ace/ACE_wrappers/ace' g++ -W -Wall -Wpointer-arith -pipe -O3 -g -fno-exceptions -fcheck-new -D_REENTRANT -I/export/sw-images/ace/ACE_wrappers -DACE_BUILD_DLL -DACE_OS_BUILD_DLL -c -fPIC -o .shobj/Basic_Types.o Basic_Types.cpp In file...

RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4 compilation error on HP-UX 11.11/GNU g++ 3.4.3
The needed fix is, indeed, in ACE 5.5. If, for some reason, you need to stay on 5.4, the 5.4e Fix Kit from Riverace has this problem fixed as well. The fix is needed for g++ 3.4 on any platform. -Steve -- Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation Helping you succeed with ACE See http://www.riverace.com/support.htm > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu > [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas C. Schmidt > Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 7:01 PM > To: ecoboja@yahoo.com; ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4 compilation error on HP-UX > 11.11/GNU g++ 3.4.3 > > > Hi, > > Thanks for using the PRF. > > >> ACE VERSION: 5.4 > > Please upgrade to ACE 5.5, which you can download from > > http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html > > The DOC groups at Washington University, UC Irvine, and Vanderbilt > University only provide "best effort" support for non-sponsors for the > latest release, as described in > > http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/docs/ACE-bug-pro > cess.html > > Thus, if you need more "predictable" help for ACE 5.4, I recommend > that you check out > >...

[tao-users] Re: ACE+TAO+CIAO
Hi folks, It's been a long time (5 months) since we put out the x.4.2 ACE+TAO+CIAO beta, and the current x.4.3 beta contains many improvements, fixes, and new features. It would be great if you could put this through its paces and let us know what problems you find so we can fix them ASAP. We plan to release the x.4.4 beta fairly soon (i.e., within a month), so your thorough testing will greatly improve its stability and portabilty! Thanks very much, Doug >> Since this is the season of giving, we are happy to announce a new beta >> of ACE-5....

[ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4 compiling problems with g++ 3.4.3
Hi Klaus, First, please use the problem-report-form when asking questions. ACE 5.4 is not supported with newer GCC versions. All these issues are resolved in the upcoming x.4.3 release. For the time being, try to add the following to your config.h # if (__GNUC__ > 3 || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 4)) # define ACE_EXPLICIT_TEMPLATE_DESTRUCTOR_TAKES_ARGS # endif /* __GNUC__ >= 3.4 */ You are correct, the download link doesn't work. Bala, do you have an idea what is happening with the download links. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT ...

[ace-users] Errors while compiling c++ 3.4.2
I get the following while compiling: /usr/bin/c++ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199506L -DNDEBUG -DUSING_GCC -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -DLINUX -I../inc -I../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers -fPIC -pedantic -fno-for-scope -Wno-long-long -Wno-deprecated -o Trace.o.linux -c Trace.cpp In file included from .../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers/ace/Unbounded_Set.h:306, from ../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers/ace/Memory_Pool.h:30, from ../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers/ace/Malloc.h:414, from ../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers/ace/String_Base....

RE: [ace-users] ACE 5.3
Hi, 5.3 is ancient, visual age 7 is brand new, I don't think anyone is using this and you problaby will find issues because this is not tested. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu > [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Praveen > Kumar Gulati > Sent: woensdag 19 oktober 2005 9:08 > To: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: [ace-users] ACE 5.3 - TAO 1.3 on AIX 5.3 with > compiler Visual Age Version 7.0 > > Hi > > I am trying to build ACE 5.3 - TAO 1.3 on AIX 5.3 with > compiler Visual Age Version 7.0. > > Do you already know some issues in above combination? > > Whether some one is already using above combination? > > Regards > > Praveen Gulati > > ...

[ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4 compilation error on HP-UX 11.11/GNU g++ 3.4.3
Hi, Thanks for using the PRF. >> ACE VERSION: 5.4 Please upgrade to ACE 5.5, which you can download from http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html The DOC groups at Washington University, UC Irvine, and Vanderbilt University only provide "best effort" support for non-sponsors for the latest release, as described in http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/docs/ACE-bug-process.html Thus, if you need more "predictable" help for ACE 5.4, I recommend that you check out http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/commercial-support.html for a list of companies that will provide you with ACE+TAO commercial support. Thanks, Doug >> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: >> HP Superdome 9000/800 HP-UX B.11.11 >> TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: COMPILER >> NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): >> GNU g++ 3.4.3 >> THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h FILE: >> ace/config-hpux-11.00.h >> THE $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU FILE >> ($ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_hpux_gcc.GNU >> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/bin/MakeProjectCreator/config/default.features >> None >> AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: >> ace/Unbounded_Queue.cpp fails to compile >> DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT: >> COMPILATION? Yes >> LINKING? No >> On Unix systems, did you run make realc...

RE: [ace-users] ACE 5.3
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01BC_01C5D46D.2EF26B10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Praveen, =20 Riverace will have an AIX 5.3/Visual Age 7 machine running next week. We have a sponsor for porting ACE 5.4 to the platform. If you'd like to sponsor us porting back to ACE 5.3, please let me know. =20 Best regards, =20 -Steve -- Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation "How to Use ACE Effectively" class Oct 17-19! See http://www.riverace.com/training.htm -----Original Message----- From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Praveen Kumar Gulati Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 3:08 AM To: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu Subject: [ace-users] ACE 5.3 - TAO 1.3 on AIX 5.3 with compiler Visual Age Version 7.0 Hi I am trying to build ACE 5.3 - TAO 1.3 on AIX 5.3 with compiler Visual Age Version 7.0. Do you already know some issues in above combination?=20 Whether some one is already using above combination? Regards Praveen Gulati ------=_NextPart_000_01BC_01C5D46D.2EF26B10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; = charset=3Dus-ascii&q...

[ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.10, STLPORT, GCC 3.3 & SunOS 5.8
Hi Rajesh, >> 1] I'm using the configure script to create the makefiles. I don't >> see any option to specify I would like to use STLPORT instead of >> libstdc++. How do I set this? Of course, I can hack the makefile >> to add this path, but is this the recommended method or is there a >> better option? Chad/J.T., is there some way to do this? >> If anyone has this working, inputs are greatly appreciated. >> 2] Does ace internally use STL? Not very much. >> I can see some configure options while configuring ace which >> relates to STL, do I have to set some option to tell ACE not to use >> STL internally or are ACE STL like functions independent of STL? Yes, that's the goal. If you run into problems please use the PRF and let us know. Thanks, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt Professor and Associate Chair Electrical Engineering and Computer Science TEL: (615) 343-8197 Institute for Software Integrated Systems WEB: www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/~schmidt Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN, 37203 NET: d.schmidt@vanderbilt.edu ...

Re: [ace-bugs] [ACE 5.4 on HP-Unix with gcc 3.3 ][I can not compile the package]
Hi Kambeez, Thanks for using the PRF. > ACE VERSION: 5.4 > > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: HP-9000/800 ; HP-Unix b.11.00 We (i.e., the DOC groups at WU/VU/UCI) don't have HP/UX, so we can't really help with this. There are other groups that support ACE on HP/UX, however, so please check out http://www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/scoreboard/integrated.html and see who provides support for these platforms and how they differ from what you're doing. You may need to follow up with some of the companies listed in http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/commercial...

Re: [ace-users] g++ 3.4.3 and ACE 5.5 & TAO 1.5
Hi, Please upgrade to ACE/TAO 1.5.3 which you can obtain from http://download.dre.vanderbilt.edu. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl "M@uro!!" <mauro.gaddo@gmail.com> wrote in message news:<1161692263.239945.111960@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>... > During compiling on HP-UX 11.11 with g++ i have the following error: > > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../.. -I.. -DACE_HAS_ACE_TOKEN > -DACE_HAS_ACE_SVCCONF -DACE_BUILD_DLL -DHPUX_VERS=1111 -w -W -Wall > -Wpointer-arith -g -O2 -pthread -pipe -I. -I.. -MT > libACE_la-OS_NS_stdio.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libACE_la-OS_NS_stdio.Tpo -c > ../../ace/OS_NS_stdio.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/libACE_la-OS_NS_stdio.o > ../../ace/OS_NS_stdio.cpp: In function `int ACE_OS::fprintf(FILE*, > const wchar_t*, ...)': > ../../ace/OS_NS_stdio.cpp:242: error: `::vfwprintf' has not been > declared > > Can someone helps me? > > Thanks!! > M. > ...

[ace-users] Re: Compiling ACE 5.4 with gcc 3.4.2 (fc3)
Hi, Thanks for using the PRF. >> ACE VERSION: 5.4 Please upgrade to ACE 5.4.4, which you can download from http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html under the heading "Latest beta version". This should fix all the problems you've run into with GCC 3.4.2. If not, please let us know what else remains. Thanks, Doug >> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: >> Linux 2.6.9-1.667 (Fedora Core 3) >> >> COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): g++ (GCC) 3.4.2 (Red Hat >> 3=2E4.2-6.fc3) >> >> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h: symbolic link to >> $ACE_ROOT/ace/config-linux.h >> I have not edited the file. >> >> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU : >> symbolic link to $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_linux.GNU >> I have not edited the file. >> >> DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT: >> COMPILATION? YES >> >> DESCRIPTION : >> I am a very neewbie and if my problem isn't a real one, I apologize by >> advance. But I spent a lot a time to find the solution in this forum >> but I can't find it :( >> >> So, here is the decription, in a first step I applied modification in >> the file $ACE_ROOT/ace/Global_Macros.h as descibed here : >> url=3D<http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.soft-sys.ace/browse_frm/thr= >> e...

[ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86
Hi Jin, >> The solaris 9/10 for sparc is not the same as solaris 9/10 for >> Intel X86,although it is almost free,and the SunStudio 9 (CC >> 5.6)for sparc is not the same as SunStudio 9(CC 5.6) for Intel X86. This is yet one more reason why you'll need to do the legwork on this. Please let us know what you find out. Thanks, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt, Professor TEL: (615) 343-8197 Electrical Engineering and Computer Science FAX: (615) 343-7440 Vanderbilt University WEB: www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ Nashvil...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86
Hi, >> ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 Thakns for using the PRF! >> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: >> Solaris10 X86 We (i.e., the DOC groups at UCI/VU/WU) don't have Solaris running on an x86 box (yet). It would therefore be great if you could figure out what patches need to be applied so that ACE compiles properly on this platform. BTW, Kitty/Bala, weren't we planning on running Solaris on an AMD box at some point? Thanks, Doug >> TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: >> COMPIL...

Re: [ace-users] problem building ACE 5.4.3 on fedora core 3
Stephen- > To: ace-bugs@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: ACE Build: lex Svc_Conf.l bombs... > > ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 > > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > Generic Intel P4, Fedora Core 3 (note 3!) > > TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: > COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): > > [adler@office00 ace]$ g++ --version > g++ (GCC) 3.4.2 20041017 (Red Hat 3.4.2-6.fc3) > Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. ...

[ace-users] Re: Compiling ACE 5.4 with gcc 3.4.2 (fc3) #2
Hi, Thanks for using the PRF form. ACE 5.4 doesn't work with GCC 3.4.2, you will end up with much more problems. We recommend you to upgrade to the x.4.4 version which you can obtain from http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Leeghwaterstraat 25 2811 DT Reeuwijk The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl "Syn" <syn_net@noos.fr> wrote in message news:<1110289867.262543.50690@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>... ACE VERSION: 5.4 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: Linux 2.6.9-1.667 (Fedora Core 3) COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): g++ (GCC) 3.4.2 (Red Hat 3.4.2-6.fc3) CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h: symbolic link to $ACE_ROOT/ace/config-linux.h I have not edited the file. CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU : symbolic link to $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_linux.GNU I have not edited the file. DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT: COMPILATION? YES DESCRIPTION : I am a very neewbie and if my problem isn't a real one, I apologize by advance. But I spent a lot a time to find the solution in this forum but I can't find it :( So, here is the decription, in a first step I applied modification in the file $ACE_ROOT/ace/Global_Macros.h as descibed here : url=<http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.soft-sys.ace/browse_frm/thread /b1c8e54cfa298f4b?tvc=1&q=gcc+3.4> The compilation can go on and I obtained ...

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
> > Ok, the problem is in platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU, when a > not known forte > > version is found, it defaults to explicit. I am updating > right now, for 4.2 > > and 5.3 we default to explicit, for all others to implicit This sounds good. > Is this necessary? I mean make it implicit by default. The > explicit is > not even supported, and has no chance to work cleanly. Why > should we patch > broken stuff. Just a thought? At least for ACE 5.5, Riverace supports the Forte compiler that requires explicit. After that, we can drop it....

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi Steve, > > Is this necessary? I mean make it implicit by default. The > > explicit is > > not even supported, and has no chance to work cleanly. Why > > should we patch > > broken stuff. Just a thought? > > At least for ACE 5.5, Riverace supports the Forte compiler that > requires explicit. After that, we can drop it. Ok. Steve, could you maybe make clear with the build names which builds use explicit templates? Explicit templates in TAO are known to be broken at this moment. Johnny ...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Johnny- > Ok, the problem is in platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU, when a not known forte > version is found, it defaults to explicit. I am updating right now, for 4.2 > and 5.3 we default to explicit, for all others to implicit Is this necessary? I mean make it implicit by default. The explicit is not even supported, and has no chance to work cleanly. Why should we patch broken stuff. Just a thought? > Qinghuajin and other Forte 9 users, you can work around this by added the > following line to your platform_macros.GNU file. > templates = implicit This is until w...

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi, > > Ok, the problem is in platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU, when a > not known forte > > version is found, it defaults to explicit. I am updating > right now, for 4.2 > > and 5.3 we default to explicit, for all others to implicit > > Is this necessary? I mean make it implicit by default. The > explicit is > not even supported, and has no chance to work cleanly. Why > should we patch > broken stuff. Just a thought? I have thought also about this, but maybe there are users around we don't know if. We can drop all this after x.5 is released, until that time, I just keep it there, just as we have a lot of other stuff that is probably broken. > > Qinghuajin and other Forte 9 users, you can work around > this by added the > > following line to your platform_macros.GNU file. > > templates = implicit > > This is until we release x.4.4., right? Yes, with x.4.4 this will be done correctly. Johnny ...

RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
> Ok. Steve, could you maybe make clear with the build names > which builds use explicit templates? I'll try to get this clarified. > Explicit templates in TAO are known to be broken at this > moment. None of the tests at Riverace try to build TAO. -Steve ...

Web resources about - RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3) - comp.soft-sys.ace

Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 User Reviews
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 reviews written by Phone Arena users. You can read the opinion of each user and how they rate the phone in 11 categories. ...

Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 official: iPhone-alike size for the new user
Samsung has revealed another in its Galaxy series, the Galaxy Ace 3, now targeting entry-level smartphone users who want a pocket-friendly 4-inch ...

Resources last updated: 3/5/2016 5:08:42 PM