f



RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE-TAO subesetting

Thanks Don,
Yes I do intend to follow up on the material you have alluded to in the
mail.

And I stumbled upon your contact during some initial reading on this
subject.

<snip><http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/docs/ACE-subsets.html>
 Anyone interested in contributing time or funding to these efforts should
please contact d.hinton@vanderbilt.edu
<snip>

/Gaurav

-----Original Message-----
From: Don Hinton [mailto:don.hinton@vanderbilt.edu] 
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 10:42 AM
To: Gaurav Khanna
Cc: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu
Subject: [ace-users] Re: ACE-TAO subesetting

Hi Gaurav:

> How do i plug into the latest state of efforts on ACE/TAO subsetting?. 
> I am trying to investigate opportunities of footprint/memory usage 
> reduction in typical use.

Thanks very much for your email.  Please make sure to send all questions
related to ACE or TAO to the ACE mailing list or ACE+TAO newsgroup, rather
than to me directly.  See

http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE-mail.html

for more info on how to access these resources.

For the latest information on ACE+TAO subsetting, please see

http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/docs/ACE-subsets.html

If you'd like to contribute to - or sponsor - efforts on ACE+TAO subsetting
please send email to Doug Schmidt <d.schmidt@vanderbilt.edu>.

Thanks very much,

       Don

0
Gaurav
11/19/2004 11:29:55 PM
comp.soft-sys.ace 20326 articles. 1 followers. marlow.andrew (167) is leader. Post Follow

0 Replies
876 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 30

Reply:

Similar Artilces:

RE: [tao-users] Re: [ace-users] Re: Announcing the release of the new beta (ACE-5.4.10, TAO-1.4.10 and CIAO-0.4.10)
Hi, > > >> We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your > > >> applications, and let us know soon if you encounter any problems > > >> since we plan to cut the x.5 release by February 28th. > > > > As per Wallace's comments, we have an aggressive schedule > for the x.5 > > release to meet the needs of some major sponsors. If > people can give > > x.4.10 a "test drive" in the next couple of days and report problems > > they encounter we'll try to ensure that we fix any > showstoppers before > > According to bugzilla bug 2323 is not fixed yet. > > http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2323 > > For us it is a show stopper. We use the OCI version which does not > have problems related to this bug but it would be nice to be able to > use the latest version with more fixes. FYI, the reason that this test now fails is because Ossama added several new test cases which wheren't in the test in the past, this uncovered some bugs which according to our information where already there a long time. Johnny "Johnny Willemsen" <jwillemsen@remedy.nl> writes: > > > >> We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your > > > >> applications, and let us know soon if you encounter any problems > > > >> sinc...

[ace-users] Re: ACE-TAO subesetting
Hi Gaurav: > How do i plug into the latest state of efforts on ACE/TAO subsetting?. I am > trying to investigate opportunities of footprint/memory usage reduction in > typical use. Thanks very much for your email. Please make sure to send all questions related to ACE or TAO to the ACE mailing list or ACE+TAO newsgroup, rather than to me directly. See http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE-mail.html for more info on how to access these resources. For the latest information on ACE+TAO subsetting, please see http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/docs/ACE-subsets.html If you'd like to contribute to - or sponsor - efforts on ACE+TAO subsetting please send email to Doug Schmidt <d.schmidt@vanderbilt.edu>. Thanks very much, Don ...

RE: [ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] ACE & POSIX
Hey there's a thought. ;-) I like it. Kindly, Graham -----Original Message----- From: owner-ace-bugs@cse.wustl.edu [mailto:owner-ace-bugs@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Stephen Torri Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 9:38 PM To: Douglas C. Schmidt Cc: ace-bugs@cs.wustl.edu Subject: Re: [ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] ACE & POSIX Douglas C. Schmidt wrote: > Hi Folks, > > >>Yes, but it sure would make the ACE libraries smaller and potentially >>easier to maintain. A lot of the OS specific code would go away. ;-) > > > Ah, but there&#...

RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE
Hi, When ACE 5.4 was released the MinGW port wasn't really up to date. Upgrade to the latest beta, that will work. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu > [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas C. Schmidt > Sent: woensdag 12 oktober 2005 19:11 > To: silviu_andrica@yahoo.com > Cc: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: [ace-users] Re: ACE > > > Hi Silviu, > > > i'm sorry fot bothering you and i know that you get this kind of > > emails all the time, > > Thanks very much for your email. Please make sure to send all > questions related to TAO or ACE to the ACE mailing list or ACE+TAO > newsgroup, rather than to me directly since I travel frequently and > often don't have ready access to email. See > > http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE-mail.html > > for more info on how to access these resources. > > > but i have a problem > > with compiling ACE 5.4. I'm trying to compile it using > > MinGW on Windows XP (SP2). > > To ensure that we have proper version/platform/compiler information, > please make sure you fill out the appropriate problem report form > (PRF), which is in > > $ACE_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM > $TAO_ROOT...

[tao-users] Re: [ace-users] How to use c++ native exception handling instead of ACE's while building ACE+TAO
Hi, >> My only guess is that all of the libs you are linking in your >> builds were not compiled with a consistent set of options. Right, my recommendation would be to completely blow away your existing ACE+TAO x.5 directory, download a fresh version, and start from a clean slate. It sounds like you may have things lying around from previous build attempts. Thanks, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt Professor and Associate Chair Electrical Engineering and Computer Science TEL: (615) 343-8197 Institute for Software Integrated Systems WEB: www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/~schmidt Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN, 37203 NET: d.schmidt@vanderbilt.edu ...

RE: [tao-users] RE: [ace-users] XML service configuration no longer works with ACE/TAO 5.4.5/1.4.5
Hi, > > Hi Lothar > > > > > � � ACE VERSION: 5.4.5 > > > > Thanks for using the PRF form. Could you try to find the > problem and send > > us patches to fix this? > > > > Regards, > > > > Johnny Willemsen > > I have no problem committing some time to the problem. I do > however know as > much as nothing about the ACE XML parser and it's recent > changes. It seems to > me that (some) of the recent changes might have caused the > test failures. So > if someone working actively on ACEXML gives me directions I > am willing to > spend my time investigating the problem. I can't remember that work has been done the last months so I am also amazed things broke. Nobody is actively working on it, so I think there are not much directions at this moment. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl On Wednesday 18 May 2005 11:01, Johnny Willemsen wrote: > Hi, > I can't remember that work has been done the last months so I am also > amazed things broke. Nobody is actively working on it, so I think there are > not much directions at this moment. Well, it did definiteley work with 5.4.4. So any changes that broke it must have been made between 5.4.4 and 5.4.5. I also read in the release email of 5.4.5 in the CIAO...

Re: [ace-bugs] RE: FW: [ace-users] ACE & POSIX
Hi Graham, >> Having spent most of my time in the murky world of real-time >> embedded systems (for the medical industry) I can tell you this. >> It is quite unlikely that the "old dodgers" (according to your >> definition I would fall into that category) would upgrade their >> version of ACE. If the current (or older) version of ACE works why >> upgrade? That's not been our experience working with scores of companies during the past decade. There are many companies who are stuck using older compiler platforms, but are quite happ...

Re: [ace-users] [BULK] Re: [ace-bugs] [BULK] Re: Calling ACE::init() causes exception on 20th instantiation of a
Thanks to Aleksandar Vukajlovic at finsoft! He got us a bit closer to finding this issue and also came up with some much simpler test code that reproduces the issue (see below). It seems that ACE::fini is not properly cleaning up a thread or some storage. When config.h file is modified to include more thread keys (#define ACE_DEFAULT_THREAD_KEYS 1000), the issue occurs later on. The default value for ACE_DEFAULT_THREAD_KEYS is 64, with this, ACE::init will fail after ~20 iterations, with it increased to 1000, ACE::init fails ~500 iterations. Small program that will reproduce bug without using complex MFC follows from Aleksandar. Many thanks in advance for anyone who can help debug this. - Andrew //Test code #include "ace/OS.h" #include "ace/Log_Msg.h" #ifdef _DEBUG const char* dll_name = "U:\\Temp\\TestACEInit\\DllTest\\Debug\\DllTest.dll"; #else const char* dll_name = "U:\\Temp\\TestACEInit\\DllTest\\Release\\DllTest.dll"; #endif //_DEBUG void doTest () { for (int i = 0; i < 1000; ++i) { HMODULE hm = ::LoadLibrary (dll_name); if (hm == NULL) ACE_DEBUG ((LM_ERROR, "failed to load library, iteration (%d)\n", i)); if (::FreeLibrary (hm) == FALSE) ACE_DEBUG ((LM_ERROR, "failed to free library, iteration (%d)\n", i)); } } int main (int argc, char* argv[]) { doTest (); return 0; } ////////////////////////////////// // DllTest code...

[ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] ACE/TAO irc channel
Hi, > Does an ACE/TAO IRC channel exist? If so where? If not should we create one? Not that I know of. Maybe it is something some people could use but most of the core developers are already swamped with work and do their best to answer e-mails on the mailing lists, so adding another communication channel is not something they probably have time for the respond to. Johnny On Friday 29 April 2005 02:44, Johnny Willemsen wrote: > Hi, > > > Does an ACE/TAO IRC channel exist? If so where? If not should we create > > one? > > Not that I know of. Maybe it is something some people could use but most of > the core developers are already swamped with work and do their best to > answer e-mails on the mailing lists, so adding another communication > channel is not something they probably have time for the respond to. > > Johnny Even as a ACE users online forum it would be helpful sometimes. Some questions (not related to bugs) can be asked easier on a medium that allows immediate response. It could also help to to build an ACE community where experienced users answer less experienced users. And even if the developers listen on the channel (for curiosity I suppose) - nobody requires them to answer. How about a poll? Who is interested in participating (actively) in an ACE/TAO irc channel? If we get enough interest we can think of creating one. Freenode would be my suggestion. We can also create separ...

[tao-users] RE: [ace-users] ACE/TAO on Solaris 10
Hi, There have been some replies. People do have things working on Solaris and there have been made fixes in ACE/TAO. Could you wait another week or so and try the x.4.8 or try cvs, see http://cvs.doc.wustl.edu Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl > Dear list members, > > (I sent this message couple of days ago and am unsure if it > was distributed, > thus re-sending it again. I apologize if you received it more > than once) > > I would like to give feedback regarding availability of > ACE/TAO (versions > 5.4.7 and 1.4.7 respectively) on OpenSolaris (Solaris 10) > Intel platform. > > Sun is selectively releasing source code of the Solaris 10 under an > open-source license. Details of this project and installable Solaris > binaries can be found on here: > http://www.opensolaris.org > > Sun has also released Forte compiler set in binary form to > the OpenSolaris > community. A Quote from their website: "Sun Studio 10 > software is freely > available to participants in the OpenSolaris community for > development on > both OpenSolaris and Solaris[tm] Operating Systems on > SPARC-based systems > and x86-based systems, as well as on Linux." You can get > access to Forte > compilers from the OpenSolaris website as well but you should register...

RE: [ace-users] Re: Simplified GUI support in ACE/TAO
Hi, > > I would argue to generate makefiles in ACE release for > > qt=1,xt=1,fl=1,tk=1 (eg. using > > mwc.pl -features qt=1,xt=1,fl=1,tk=1), but leave these features > > disabled in default.features. > > This way one can easily compile GUI stuff in release > version, but when > > regenerating then > > using MPC one has to explicitly state that required packages are > > available. > > This solution would save a significant amount of time in > build processes > which include GUI libraries, since the MPC re-generation step takes > quite a long time. I just propose to set the mentioned options for GNU make, this will also prevent our GNU users from regenerating the makefiles. Johnny ...

Re: [ace-users] Re: ACE/TAO corba: 4 questions
Dr. Schmidt- > >> 1. I have to switch to bidirectional connection model because > >> clients behind NAT/firewall can not be called back by server. I do > >> not really know how to change my application to use bidirectional > >> TCP connections. Do I have to add some ORB parameter for > >> client/server? Do I have to change client/server source code or > >> something else? > > Please see > > $TAO_ROOT/tests/BiDirectional/ > $TAO_ROOT/tests/BiDirectional_MultipleORB/ > $TAO_ROOT/tests/BiDirectional_NestedUpcall/ > > for some examples. I also recommend that you upgrade to the TAO 1.4.2 > release since I believe it fixes some bugs in earlier versions of > TAO. Bala, can you please confirm/deny. There was a bug fixed after x.4.2 and the test $TAO_ROOT/tests/BiDirectional_MultipleORB/ was for this bug. I would recommend using the latest version from the main trunk until we cut x.4.3. To use the code from the main trunk please use the anon cvs repo. INformation to access the repo is available at http://cvs.doc.wustl.edu/anoncvs.html [...] > >> 4. Does ACE/TAO corba support proxy connection? Can I configure > >> client to connect to some corba server through proxy server (with > >> or without user authentication)? How can I achieve this? Most other > >> client-server application have such option so I believe that it >...

[ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] ACE
Hi, Thanks for using the PRF. >> ACE VERSION: 5.4.1 >> >> HP Server and HP-UX 11.1 >> >> aCC: HP ANSI C++ B3910B A.03.37 >> >> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h : config-hpux-11.00.h >> >> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU : >> platorm_hpux_aCC.GNU >> >> AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: >> >> $ACE_ROOT/ace - Compiled successfully but >> >> $ACE_ROOT/ - failed to compile as shown below >> >> Installing gperf -> /home/umit...

[ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] How to use c++ native exception handling instead of ACE's while building ACE+TAO
Hi, To ensure that we have proper version/platform/compiler information, please make sure you fill out the appropriate problem report form (PRF), which is in $ACE_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $TAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM or in $ACE_ROOT/BUG-REPORT-FORM $TAO_ROOT/BUG-REPORT-FORM in older versions of ACE+TAO. Make sure to include this information when asking any questions about ACE+TAO since otherwise we have to "guess" what version/platform/compiler/options you've using, which is error-prone and slows down our responsiveness. > I know we can set exceptions = 1 or 0 in platform_macros.GNU > to use ACE's exception handling or C++'s native exception handling. > > But I am still not clear on which value should I set exceptions to if > I want to use only the C++'s native exception handling support. Then just set it to 1 which is the default. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl ------=_Part_4854_4331443.1142846841468 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline ACE VERSION: 5.5 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: *Sparc, Solaris 10 * If on Windows based OS's, which version of WINSOCK do you use?: TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AN...

[ace-users] Re: [ace-bugs] ACE Licensing Issue: ace/CLASSIX
Hi Michael, Thanks for using the PRF. >> ACE VERSION: 5.4 >> >> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: >> HP rp8400 HP-UX 11iv1 >> >> TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: >> COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): >> aCC >> >> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h: >> >> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU >> (unless >> this isn't used in this case, e.g., with Microsoft Visual C++): >> >> AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: >> ace/CLASSIX >> >> DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT: >> OTHER? (Licensing) >> >> SYNOPSIS: >> Nearly all the files in ace/CLASSIX have a copyright in them >> or a signature from Nokia. Our lawyers are going nuts. >> Example: >> CLASSIX_Dgram_Mcast.cpp: >> // Copyright 1998 Nokia Telecommunications >> >> CLASSIX_OS.h >> // = AUTHOR(S) >> // Nokia Telecommunications >> >> DESCRIPTION: >> How does this affect the ace license? >> >> REPEAT BY: >> >> SAMPLE FIX/WORKAROUND: >> Get the copyrights out of the code, or put special permissions >> into the code. O...

RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE on Microc
> >> Does ACE ported on to Microc OS? > > I don't think so. Does it have a POSIX-based API? If so, the port > would be easy. > > >> I am interested in using some of the features like ASX framework in > >> my Avionics-Cockpit project. What will be the maximum memory foot > >> print If I just want to use the ASX framework? > > I suspect it would be around 300 to 500k. > uCOS-II does NOT use the posix API, so you would not want to use uCOS-II as the RTOS for this application. RTEMS is an open-source (and free) OS that supported ACE at some point. I have not tried to use it, but you could check into it and let us know. eCOS is also an open source RTOS with posix API, so that might have a port (I haven't heard of one though). The commercial RTOS VxWorks has an ACE port. I'm not sure, but QNX might too. I'm sure there is a page on the ACE web site somewhere :) Here's one of those pages ... http://www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/versions.html Cheers Dave Hi Doug & Dave Thanks for the information. We are using uCOS-II, since it is already certified for safety critical application. Thanks Sak ...

RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE #2
Hi Folks, > Sorry about the wrong message. It does work, I did not wait enough > To roll it over. Ok, great - I'm glad to hear that it works! Thanks, Doug ...

RE: [ace-users] Re: Question about ACE
Hi, So far as I know the ACE 5.4.4 should build with Embedded Visual C++. Because you don't used the PRF form we lack more info to give you more directions. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu > [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas C. Schmidt > Sent: vrijdag 15 april 2005 18:50 > To: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu; ofup@voila.fr; spence_m@ociweb.com > Subject: [ace-users] Re: Question about ACE > > > Hi, > > > Sorry to write to you directly, but whereas I've signe to > the group I > > can't write on it. > > Thanks very much for your email. Please make sure to send all > questions related to TAO or ACE to the ACE mailing list or ACE+TAO > newsgroup, rather than to me directly since I travel frequently and > often don't have ready access to email. See > > http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE-mail.html > > for more info on how to access these resources. > > > I'd like to know if we can compile ACE for windows CE (ideally > > smartphone2003) on windows XP using EMBEDDED VISUAL. > > > > I was able to compile ACE with Visual C++ for windows but not with > > EMBEDDED Visual. > > To ensure that we have proper version/platform/compiler > information, please make s...

Re: [ace-users] Re: ACE refactoring
Hi Folks, I've updated the ACE-subsets.html document at http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/docs/ACE-subsets.html to describe our ideas for subsetting and refactoring ACE so that its footprint will be smaller. If there is interest in sponsoring this work or contributing your time to help accomplish these tasks, please let me and Don <dhinton@dre.vanderbilt.edu> know. Thanks, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt, Professor TEL: (615) 343-8197 Electrical Engineering and Computer Science FAX: (615) 343-7440 Vanderbilt University WEB: www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ Nashville, TN 37203 NET: d.schmidt@vanderbilt.edu ...

RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE #2
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C6413F.CD2A80C8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Logging_Strategy problems were fixed in 5.4.7. You should definitely upgrade. =20 Howard =20 _____ =20 From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Kobi Cohen-Arazi Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 12:44 AM To: hileon@gmail.com Cc: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu Subject: Re: [ace-users] Re: ACE =20 Hi, We had bugs in that specific area (Limit the size using Logging_Strategy) in x.4.0. You probably seeing that same bug ... It was fixed year ago. Upgrading may help.=20 Thanks, Kobi. On 3/1/06, Douglas C. Schmidt <schmidt@cse.wustl.edu> wrote: Hi, >> I use ACE 5.4+TAO 1.4. To ensure that we have proper version/platform/compiler information, please make sure you fill out the appropriate problem report form (PRF), which is in $ACE_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM=20 $TAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM or in $ACE_ROOT/BUG-REPORT-FORM $TAO_ROOT/BUG-REPORT-FORM in older versions of ACE+TAO. Make sure to include this information when asking any questions about ACE+TAO since otherwise we have to=20 "guess" what version/platform/compiler/options you've using, which is error-prone and slows down our responsiveness. Moreover, please upgrade to ACE+TAO x.4.10, which you can download...

RE: [ace-users] Re: Questions about ACE
Hi, > > Has ACE been built on a Windows 98SE with g++ (mingw)? > > To ensure that we have proper version/platform/compiler information, > please make sure you fill out the appropriate problem report form > (PRF), which is in > > $ACE_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM > $TAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM > > or in > > $ACE_ROOT/BUG-REPORT-FORM > $TAO_ROOT/BUG-REPORT-FORM > > in older versions of ACE+TAO. Make sure to include this information > when asking any questions about ACE+TAO since otherwise we have to > "guess" what version/platform/compiler/options you've using, which is > error-prone and slows down our responsiveness. > > > Also, does it work onthat platform? > > I believe that ACE 5.4.3 (available from > deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html) should work with MinGW. We build and tests daily with MinGW on Windows XP and don't have any problems. There are no daily builds for Windows 98SE so I can make no statements for the Windows 98 SE support. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Leeghwaterstraat 25 2811 DT Reeuwijk The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl ...

RE: [ace-users] Re: I cannot build ACE
Hi, This is not a problem, you don't have ssl installed, so it is not just build. The ACE lib itself is build. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu > [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Ji Soo > Sent: vrijdag 17 maart 2006 4:36 > To: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: [ace-users] Re: I cannot build ACE > > The complete "make" output: > > ...... > ...... > rm -f libACE.so > ln -s libACE.so.5.5.0 libACE.so > chmod a+rx libACE.so.5.5.0 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/ACE_wrappers/ace' > make[1]: Entering directory `/opt/ACE_wrappers/ace' > This project will not be built due to one of the following > missing features: > x11 gl fl > > GNUmakefile: /opt/ACE_wrappers/ace/GNUmakefile.ACE_FlReactor > MAKEFLAGS=w > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/ACE_wrappers/ace' > make[1]: Entering directory `/opt/ACE_wrappers/ace' > This project will not be built due to one of the following > missing features: > qt > > GNUmakefile: /opt/ACE_wrappers/ace/GNUmakefile.ACE_QtReactor > MAKEFLAGS=w > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/ACE_wrappers/ace' > make[1]: Entering directory `/opt/ACE_wrappers/ace' > This project will...

RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE #2
Hi, Somewhere in your app you should run the reactor loop Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl > >> I update the ACE version to 5.4.10, but it seems have no help. > >> > >> ACE_Logging_Strategy : the -m option does not work. > >> > >> ACE VERSION: 5.4.10 > >> > >> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > >> Windows XP SP2 > >> > >> TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: > >> Windows XP SP2 > >> > >> THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h FILE : > >> #include "ace/config-win32.h" > >> > >> THE $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU > FILE [if you > >> use a link to a platform-specific file, simply state which one > >> (unless this isn't used in this case, e.g., with > Microsoft Visual > >> C++)]: > >> Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0 sp6 > >> > >> CONTENTS OF > >> $ACE_ROOT/bin/MakeProjectCreator/config/default.features > >> (used by MPC when you generate your own makefiles): > >> There is no this file. > >> > >> AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: > >> APG\Logging\Use_Logging_Strategy.d...

Re: [ace-bugs] RE: [ace-users] Linux LFS (Large File Support) and ACE
Hi, >> I guess I'm a bit confused. From what I've read on the net, it >> seems that if I define -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 (as reported by >> getconf LFS_CFLAGS on linux), and my code uses posix types >> religiously, then my code should become large-file capable "just >> like that." Based on your email, if ACE is type-safe, then it >> should magically support large files given this flag. (getconf >> LFS_LDFLAGS returns nothing on linux). >> >> Yet, you also mention adding interfaces ACE_OS and ACE_File. What >> would be the motivation of those interfaces if the above is true? >> >> I suppose the answer is "to support large files on systems that do >> not support LFS API's posixely" ? I think the main issue here is that different operating systems provide different ways to handle "large" files. For example, some operating systems have you pass special compile flags (e.g. -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64) and/or use special functions (e.g., the *64() functions provided by AIX and HP/UX). As far as I know, there is no POSIX "standard" way to handle this. There's no current support in ACE for the *64() functions, which is what's provided by that *.zip file whose URL I sent you. It may be easier, however, just to try and recompile ACE and your apps using the -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 to see if that works first. If not, pleas...

Web resources about - RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE-TAO subesetting - comp.soft-sys.ace

Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 User Reviews
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 reviews written by Phone Arena users. You can read the opinion of each user and how they rate the phone in 11 categories. ...

Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 official: iPhone-alike size for the new user
Samsung has revealed another in its Galaxy series, the Galaxy Ace 3, now targeting entry-level smartphone users who want a pocket-friendly 4-inch ...

Resources last updated: 3/6/2016 1:11:38 AM