f



Re: [ace-users] [tao-users] PRF: ORB Unable to launch on an IPv4 host w/ ACE IPv6 enabled #2

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C6ECB7.AFCEBE10
Content-Type: text/plain

> Hi Andre,
> 
> Could you please run ACE_wrappers/tests/Enum_Interfaces_Test 
> and post the resulting contents of 
> ACE_wrappers/tests/log/Enum_Interfaces_Test.log?
> 
> Thanks,
> -Steve

Fails as follows:

Oct 10 14:59:17.145 2006@LM_DEBUG@(2396|2748) Starting Enum_Interfaces_Test
test at Tue Oct 10 2006 14:59:17.145000
Oct 10 14:59:17.145 2006@LM_DEBUG@Machine: AKOSTUR running on Intel Unknown
Oct 10 14:59:17.145 2006@LM_DEBUG@Platform: Win32, Windows NT 5.1, Build
2600 Service Pack 2
Oct 10 14:59:17.160 2006@LM_ERROR@ACE::get_ip_interfaces failed: File exists
Oct 10 14:59:17.160 2006@LM_DEBUG@(2396|2748) Ending Enum_Interfaces_Test
test at Tue Oct 10 2006 14:59:17.160000



------_=_NextPart_001_01C6ECB7.AFCEBE10
Content-Type: text/html

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>RE: [ace-users] [tao-users] PRF: ORB Unable to launch on an IPv4 host w/ ACE IPv6 enabled</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; Hi Andre,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; Could you please run ACE_wrappers/tests/Enum_Interfaces_Test </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; and post the resulting contents of </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; ACE_wrappers/tests/log/Enum_Interfaces_Test.log?</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; Thanks,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>&gt; -Steve</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>Fails as follows:</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>Oct 10 14:59:17.145 2006@LM_DEBUG@(2396|2748) Starting Enum_Interfaces_Test test at Tue Oct 10 2006 14:59:17.145000</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Oct 10 14:59:17.145 2006@LM_DEBUG@Machine: AKOSTUR running on Intel Unknown</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Oct 10 14:59:17.145 2006@LM_DEBUG@Platform: Win32, Windows NT 5.1, Build 2600 Service Pack 2</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Oct 10 14:59:17.160 2006@LM_ERROR@ACE::get_ip_interfaces failed: File exists</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Oct 10 14:59:17.160 2006@LM_DEBUG@(2396|2748) Ending Enum_Interfaces_Test test at Tue Oct 10 2006 14:59:17.160000</FONT>
</P>
<BR>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C6ECB7.AFCEBE10--

0
Kostur
10/10/2006 10:01:49 PM
comp.soft-sys.ace 20326 articles. 1 followers. marlow.andrew (167) is leader. Post Follow

0 Replies
671 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 35

Reply:

Similar Artilces:

Re: [ace-users] [tao-users] PRF: ORB Unable to launch on an IPv4 host w/ ACE IPv6 enabled
Hi Andre, Thanks for using the PRF. Congrats on reporting the first bug with x.5.3 ;-) > TAO VERSION: 1.5.3 > ACE VERSION: 5.5.3 > > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: Windows XP SP2 > > TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: > COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): Visual Studio 2005 > > THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h FILE [if you use a link to a platform- > specific file, simply state which one]: > >#define ACE_AS_STATIC_LIBS 1 >#define TAO_AS_STATIC_LIBS 1 >#define ACE_HAS_STANDARD_CPP_LIBRARY 1 >#define ACE_HAS_IPV6 1 >#define ACE_USES_IPV4_IPV6_MIGRATION 1 >#define ACE_GPERF "gperf.exe" >#define _CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE 1 >#include "ace\config-win32.h" > > THE $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU FILE [if you > use a link to a platform-specific file, simply state which one > (unless this isn't used in this case, e.g., with Microsoft Visual > C++)]: n/a > > CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/bin/MakeProjectCreator/config/default.features > (used by MPC when you generate your own makefiles): > >ssl = 1 >ipv6 = 1 > > AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: > Hello_Server > > DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT: > COMPILATION? No > LINKING? No > EXECUTION? Yes > OTHER (ple...

[tao-users] PRF: ORB Unable to launch on an IPv4 host w/ ACE IPv6 enabled
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C6EC9A.520F7020 Content-Type: text/plain TAO VERSION: 1.5.3 ACE VERSION: 5.5.3 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: Windows XP SP2 TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): Visual Studio 2005 THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h FILE [if you use a link to a platform- specific file, simply state which one]: #define ACE_AS_STATIC_LIBS 1 #define TAO_AS_STATIC_LIBS 1 #define ACE_HAS_STANDARD_CPP_LIBRARY 1 #define ACE_HAS_IPV6 1 #define ACE_USES_IPV4_IPV6_MIGRATION 1 #define ACE_GPERF "gperf.exe" #define _CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE 1 #include "ace\config-win32.h" THE $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU FILE [if you use a link to a platform-specific file, simply state which one (unless this isn't used in this case, e.g., with Microsoft Visual C++)]: n/a CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/bin/MakeProjectCreator/config/default.features (used by MPC when you generate your own makefiles): ssl = 1 ipv6 = 1 AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: Hello_Server DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT: COMPILATION? No LINKING? No EXECUTION? Yes OTHER (please specify)? No SYNOPSIS: ...

[tao-users] Re: [ace-users] The ACE ORB and Solaris
Hi, To ensure that we have proper version/platform/compiler information, please make sure you fill out the appropriate problem report form (PRF), which is in $ACE_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $TAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM or in $ACE_ROOT/BUG-REPORT-FORM $TAO_ROOT/BUG-REPORT-FORM in older versions of ACE+TAO. Make sure to include this information when asking any questions about ACE+TAO since otherwise we have to "guess" what version/platform/compiler/options you've using, which is error-prone and slows down our responsiveness. >> does the ACE ORB run on Solaris 10 (SPARC)? Yes, please see http://www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/scoreboard/integrated.html for the OS platforms and compilers that we test ACE+TAO with regularly, which includes Solaris 10. >> I could only find information that it runs on e.g. Solaris 1.x and >> 2.x on SPARC and Intel >> (http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/TAO-status.html). I've fixed this so it doesn't appear to limit Solaris support to 1.x or 2.x. >> Also, does ACE ORB interoperate with Orbacus without problems? Yes, as far as we know. If you run into problems please use the PRF to report them. Thanks, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt Professor and Associate Chair Electrical Engineering and Computer Science TEL: (615) 343-8197 Institute for Software Integrated Systems WEB: www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/~schmidt Vanderbilt U...

[ace-users] RE: [tao-users] Borland Developer Studio 2006 with ACE/TAO #2
Hi, See http://www.remedy.nl/en/borland.html for an overview of the supported Borland products with TAO. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl > -----Original Message----- > From: Espen Harlinn [mailto:espen@harlinn.no] > Sent: donderdag 2 februari 2006 18:06 > To: jwillemsen@remedy.nl > Cc: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: RE: [tao-users] Borland Developer Studio 2006 with ACE/TAO > > Hi, > > I'm curious about the current status of ACE/TAO and C++ Builder 2006. > Borland shipped the promised fix/update some time ago, but I > couldn't find > anything about how it works with ACE/TAO. > > Regards > Espen Harlinn > > ...

[ace-users] RE: [tao-users] Borland Developer Studio 2006 with ACE/TAO #2
Hi, The x.4.8 version of ACE/TAO is supported with BCB2006, we have some linker warnings/errors in some configurations, Borland is working on these for Update2, but these are not causing a problem. See ACE_wrappers/ACE-INSTALL.html for info about how to use it. We deliver also commercial support for using BCB2006 with ACE/TAO. See www.theaceorb.nl for our services. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl > -----Original Message----- > From: Espen Harlinn [mailto:espen@harlinn.no] > Sent: donderdag 2 februari 2006 18:06 > To: jwillemsen@remedy.nl > Cc: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: RE: [tao-users] Borland Developer Studio 2006 with ACE/TAO > > Hi, > > I'm curious about the current status of ACE/TAO and C++ Builder 2006. > Borland shipped the promised fix/update some time ago, but I > couldn't find > anything about how it works with ACE/TAO. > > Regards > Espen Harlinn > > ...

[ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] How to Use IPv6 in ACE? #2
Please stop reposting this question. Bala and I have already answered it the past several days. Check out http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ace-bugs/message/4421 for my answer. Thanks, Doug >> ACE VERSION: 5.4.1 >> >> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: >> SUN Solaris 8 >> >> TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: >> COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): >> SUN Forte6 C++ UP1 >> >> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h [if you use a link to a...

[tao-users] Re: [ace-users] How to use c++ native exception handling instead of ACE's while building ACE+TAO
Hi, >> My only guess is that all of the libs you are linking in your >> builds were not compiled with a consistent set of options. Right, my recommendation would be to completely blow away your existing ACE+TAO x.5 directory, download a fresh version, and start from a clean slate. It sounds like you may have things lying around from previous build attempts. Thanks, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt Professor and Associate Chair Electrical Engineering and Computer Science TEL: (615) 343-8197 Institute for Software Integrated Systems WEB: www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/~schmidt Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN, 37203 NET: d.schmidt@vanderbilt.edu ...

[tao-users] RE: [ace-users] ACE/TAO on Solaris 10
Hi, There have been some replies. People do have things working on Solaris and there have been made fixes in ACE/TAO. Could you wait another week or so and try the x.4.8 or try cvs, see http://cvs.doc.wustl.edu Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl > Dear list members, > > (I sent this message couple of days ago and am unsure if it > was distributed, > thus re-sending it again. I apologize if you received it more > than once) > > I would like to give feedback regarding availability of > ACE/TAO (versions > 5.4.7 and 1.4.7 respectively) on OpenSolaris (Solaris 10) > Intel platform. > > Sun is selectively releasing source code of the Solaris 10 under an > open-source license. Details of this project and installable Solaris > binaries can be found on here: > http://www.opensolaris.org > > Sun has also released Forte compiler set in binary form to > the OpenSolaris > community. A Quote from their website: "Sun Studio 10 > software is freely > available to participants in the OpenSolaris community for > development on > both OpenSolaris and Solaris[tm] Operating Systems on > SPARC-based systems > and x86-based systems, as well as on Linux." You can get > access to Forte > compilers from the OpenSolaris website as well but you should register...

[ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] ACE
Hi Srujan, >> I am using ACE 5.1 on Solaris. How can I find out that IPv6 is >> enabled in my build. I couldnt use the ACE::ipv6_enabled() >> function. Also, in ACE5.1 how can I detertmine at run time that >> IPv6 has been enabled on the machine. ACE 5.1 is ANCIENT. Please upgrade to a more recent version of ACE, e.g., ACE 5.4.4 <deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html> or one of the commercially supported versions, as discussed at http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/commercial-support.html Thanks, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt ...

RE: [ace-users] Ace-users messages #2
Hi Heber, > I have also experienced a problem with posts to ace-users (and > owner-ace-users) never seeming to arrive. I have sent four > messages, some from work and some from my personal account at > comcast, and have never seen any sign of them (but I get lots of > other people's posts to ace-users!) You need to make sure you post from the email address you subscribed to the list. Please see http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE-mail.html for instructions. > Is there any filtering of these messages, before they are forwarded > to the ace-users mailing list, that my posts could have triggered > for some reason? I believe there's some weird filtering that majordomo does, e.g., if you put the keyword "help" in the subject it doesn't get posted. I have no idea why that's the case :-/ Otherwise, however, things should post fine. Take care, Doug ...

RE: [ace-users] ACE-USERS List #2
Hi Doug, > >> Is there another repository I can review for ACE-USERS archival? > > I recommend trying > > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.soft-sys.ace?hl=en Right, thanks, I always I forget I can do this with ACE (but not TAO ;)). Cheers, -David Hi David - David Hauck wrote: > Hi Doug, > > >>>>Is there another repository I can review for ACE-USERS archival? >> >>I recommend trying >> >>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.soft-sys.ace?hl=en > > > Right, thanks, I always I forget I can do this with ACE (but not TAO ;)). > the comp.soft-sys.ace newsgroup also picks up messages to the TAO and CIAO mailing lists. hth, /-Will ...

RE: [ace-users] ACE-USERS List #2
Hi Doug, ah, right, thanks :). -David > Hi David, > > >> > >> Is there another repository I can review for ACE-USERS archival? > >> > > >> > I recommend trying > >> > > >> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.soft-sys.ace?hl=en > >> > >> Right, thanks, I always I forget I can do this with ACE (but > not TAO ;)). > > Actually, *all* the mailing lists are gateway'd there, regardless of > whether they are ACE, TAO, CIAO, etc. > > Thanks, > > Doug > -- > Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt Professor and Associate Chair > Electrical Engineering and Computer Science TEL: (615) 343-8197 > Institute for Software Integrated Systems WEB: > www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/~schmidt > Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN, 37203 NET: > d.schmidt@vanderbilt.edu ...

Re: [ace-users] ACE-USERS List #2
Hi David, >> > >> Is there another repository I can review for ACE-USERS archival? >> > >> > I recommend trying >> > >> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.soft-sys.ace?hl=en >> >> Right, thanks, I always I forget I can do this with ACE (but not TAO ;)). Actually, *all* the mailing lists are gateway'd there, regardless of whether they are ACE, TAO, CIAO, etc. Thanks, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt Professor and Associate Chair Electrical Engineering and Computer Science TEL: (615) 343-8197 Institute for Software Integrated Systems WEB: www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/~schmidt Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN, 37203 NET: d.schmidt@vanderbilt.edu ...

RE: [ace-users] Ace-users messages #2
I have also experienced a problem with posts to ace-users (and owner-ace-users) never seeming to arrive. I have sent four messages, some from work and some from my personal account at comcast, and have never seen any sign of them (but I get lots of other people's posts to ace-users!) Is there any filtering of these messages, before they are forwarded to the ace-users mailing list, that my posts could have triggered for some reason? Heber Bennion -----Original Message----- From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu]On Behalf Of Q Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 8:38 AM To: Douglas C. Schmidt Cc: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu; coroberti@gmail.com Subject: Re: [ace-users] Ace-users messages Douglas C. Schmidt wrote: > Hi Robert, > > >>>PRF independent question. >>> >>>My impression is that, I do not get primary >>>postings to ace-users, but only further responses, >>>e.g. posted by Douglas. >>> >>>Could it be some problem with the server redirection >>>policy? > > > As far as I can tell, things are working fine. > > Take care, > > Doug As for me it doesn't work fine. Some my last post were lost on the way to [ace-users] list (I haven't seen them in list or appropriate news group). May be it's not problem list server and messages were lost somewhere in the middle of the way ... ...

[ace-users] [ace-user] problem on building ACE+TAO+CAIO
Dear, all. I have a problem on buliding ACE+TAO+CAIO. ACE VERSION: 5.5 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: HOST Machine: Intel Pentium D 3.0 1GB OS: Windows XP Professional SP2 TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM Same with the HOST machine and OS THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h FILE #define ACE_HAS_MFC 1 #define ACE_NO_INLINE #define ACE_HAS_STANDARD_CPP_LIBRARY 1 #include "ace/config-win32.h" DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT: ACE+TAO+CAIO building SYNOPSIS: occurrance of syntax error during building ACE+TAO+CAIO DESCRIPTION: during building ACE+TAO+CAIO, syntax errors occurs at the point of enum definition in the file, options.h. Also, there are bunch of other errors. class ACE_Svc_Export Options { // = TITLE // Singleton that consolidates all Options for a gatewayd. public: // = Options that can be enabled/disabled. enum { // = The types of threading strategies. REACTIVE = 0, OUTPUT_MT = 1, INPUT_MT = 2, VERBOSE = 01, DEBUG = 02, SUPPLIER_ACCEPTOR = 04, CONSUMER_ACCEPTOR = 010, SUPPLIER_CONNECTOR = 020, CONSUMER_CONNECTOR = 040 }; one of them says that '}' is missing in front of '='. Did I misconfigure something? Thanks. - Je...

RE: [tao-users] Re: [ace-users] Re: Announcing the release of the new beta (ACE-5.4.10, TAO-1.4.10 and CIAO-0.4.10)
Hi, > > >> We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your > > >> applications, and let us know soon if you encounter any problems > > >> since we plan to cut the x.5 release by February 28th. > > > > As per Wallace's comments, we have an aggressive schedule > for the x.5 > > release to meet the needs of some major sponsors. If > people can give > > x.4.10 a "test drive" in the next couple of days and report problems > > they encounter we'll try to ensure that we fix any > showstoppers before > > According to bugzilla bug 2323 is not fixed yet. > > http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2323 > > For us it is a show stopper. We use the OCI version which does not > have problems related to this bug but it would be nice to be able to > use the latest version with more fixes. FYI, the reason that this test now fails is because Ossama added several new test cases which wheren't in the test in the past, this uncovered some bugs which according to our information where already there a long time. Johnny "Johnny Willemsen" <jwillemsen@remedy.nl> writes: > > > >> We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your > > > >> applications, and let us know soon if you encounter any problems > > > >> sinc...

Re: [ace-users] [tao-users] ACE/TAO ported to Sun Studio 12
Hi, > is this change included in the official release of ACT/TAO (and if yes > since which version)? This change will be part of the upcoming x.6.2 version. I am creating x.6.2 at this moment, when everything runs fine it will be available at the end of today. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl *** Integrated compile and test statistics see http://scoreboard.theaceorb.nl *** *** Commercial service and support for ACE/TAO/CIAO *** *** See http://www.theaceorb.nl/en/support.html *** ...

[ace-users] RE: [tao-users] Borland Developer Studio 2006 with ACE/TAO
Hi, I'm curious about the current status of ACE/TAO and C++ Builder 2006. Borland shipped the promised fix/update some time ago, but I couldn't find anything about how it works with ACE/TAO. Regards Espen Harlinn ...

[tao-users] Re: [ace-users] timestamps incorrect in ACE+TAO .tar.gz
Hi > It has just come to my attention that there are many files in the > ACE+TAO .tar.gz file with timestamps showing '1970-01-05'. Obviously > this is wrong and is the only reason why my packages have been > rejected from Debian ("file(s) with a time stamp too ancient"). > > Is there a possibility that this will be fixed. Or should I just > 'touch' all the problematic files? Could you please run a touch on them? I don't know how this happened. Strange. Opening and fiddling with the distribution would make quite a few things goofy! If ...

[tao-users] RE: [ace-users] Tao_idl core dumps during ACE/TAO build
Hi, Please upgrade to ACE+TAO x.4.7, which you can download from http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html under the heading "latest beta kit". The DOC groups at Washington University, UC Irvine, and Vanderbilt University only provide "best effort" support for non-sponsors for the latest beta kit, as described in http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/docs/ACE-bug-process.html Thus, if you need more "predictable" help, I recommend that you check out http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/commercial-support.html for a list of companies that will provide you with ACE+TAO commercial support. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl > TAO VERSION: 1.4.1 > ACE VERSION: 5.4.1 > > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > Dell PowerEdge750, Slackware Linux 10.1.0 > > TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: > COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): > gcc version 3.3.4 > > AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: > CosConcurrencyControl.idl failed due to tao_idl core dump > > DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT: > COMPILATION? Yes > $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h and > $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU > included below > LINKING? No > EXECUTION? No > OTHER (please specify)? No > > SYNOPSIS: > TAO fails to build because tao_...

[ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] How to Use IPv6 in ACE?
Hi, Thanks for using the PRF. >> ACE VERSION: 5.4.1 >> >> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: >> SUN Solaris 8 >> >> TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: >> COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): >> SUN Forte6 C++ UP1 >> >> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h [if you use a link to a platform- >> specific file, simply state which one]: >> config-sunos5.8.h >> >> CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude...

[ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] ACE support for IPv6
Hi Vivek, >> Could anyone send me some documentation or links on how IPv6 is >> handled in ACE and usage related documentation. I believe this is described in the ACE Programmer's Guide book, which you can obtain from http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0201699710/qid=1066059513/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_1/102-5569290-4943326?v=glance&s=books&n=507846 There are also examples in $ACE_ROOT/tests/*IPv6.cpp $ACE_ROOT/tests/*IPV6.cpp Take care, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt, Professor TEL: (615) 343-8197 Electrical Engineering ...

[ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] Moving to ACE? #2
Hi Roger, >> Could you please explain these kernel problems on Linux? I think there are two problems: .. There are (were) bugs in the Linux implementation of the aio_*() functions. These manifested themselves by failures of the $ACE_ROOT/tests/Proactor_Test.cpp on Linux. .. The Linux kernel implements the aio_*() functions by spawning a thread for each asynchronous request, which sort of defeats the point of asynchronous I/O! Take care, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt, Professor TEL: (615) 343-8197 Electrical Engineeri...

Web resources about - Re: [ace-users] [tao-users] PRF: ORB Unable to launch on an IPv4 host w/ ACE IPv6 enabled #2 - comp.soft-sys.ace

Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 User Reviews
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 reviews written by Phone Arena users. You can read the opinion of each user and how they rate the phone in 11 categories. ...

Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 official: iPhone-alike size for the new user
Samsung has revealed another in its Galaxy series, the Galaxy Ace 3, now targeting entry-level smartphone users who want a pocket-friendly 4-inch ...

Resources last updated: 3/5/2016 6:16:43 AM