f



Re: [ciao-users] Deployment error in CIAO 0.4.9 #2

Hi Jai and Gan,

Gan, the XML descriptor contains the right entry point in the <location>
tag.

Jai, indeed, running 'ldd -r' I get many undefined symbols, for example:

....

undefined symbol:
_ZTIN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicitE
(./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so)
undefined symbol:
_ZN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicit5_is_aEPKc
(./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so)
undefined symbol:
_ZNK5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicit24_interface_repository_idEv      (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so)
undefined symbol:
_ZN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicit7marshalER13TAO_OutputCDR  (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so)
undefined symbol:
_ZN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicitD1Ev
(./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so)
undefined symbol:
_ZN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicitD0Ev
(./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so)
undefined symbol:
_ZTv0_n12_N5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicitD1Ev
(./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so)
undefined symbol:
_ZTv0_n12_N5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicitD0Ev
(./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so)
undefined symbol:
_ZTv0_n16_N5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicit5_is_aEPKc (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so)
undefined symbol:
_ZTv0_n20_NK5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicit24_interface_repository_idEv      (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so)
undefined symbol:
_ZTv0_n104_N5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicit7marshalER13TAO_OutputCDR (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so)
undefined symbol:
_ZTIN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeExplicitE
(./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so)
undefined symbol:
_ZN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeExplicit5_is_aEPKc
(./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so)
undefined symbol:
_ZNK5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeExplicit24_interface_repository_idEv      (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so)
undefined symbol:
_ZN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeExplicit7marshalER13TAO_OutputCDR  (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so)
undefined symbol:
_ZN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeExplicitD1Ev
(./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so)
undefined symbol:
_ZN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeExplicitD0Ev
(./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so)
undefined symbol:
_ZTv0_n12_N5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeExplicitD1Ev
(./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so)
undefined symbol:
_ZTv0_n12_N5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeExplicitD0Ev
(./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so)
undefined symbol:
_ZTv0_n16_N5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeExplicit5_is_aEPKc (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so)

....

I really don't know why this is happening. In CIAO 0.4.8 with g++ 4 we
had experienced some problems of hidden visibility. We by pass this
including the line:

no-hidden-visitibility=1

in platform_macros.GNU

but I included this line, recompiled whole CIAO and my application yet
presents undefined symbols !!! This stuff worked fine in CIAO 0.4.8.

Any other idea ?

Thanks,
Sandro

Em Qui, 2006-02-09 �s 14:42 -0600, Jaiganesh Balasubramanian escreveu:
> Hi Sandro,
> 
> > CIAO (32106|3073791680) Container_Base.cpp
> > -Session_Container::ciao_install_home -ERROR in opening the executor
DLL
> > [ARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec]
> > (32106|3073791680) EXCEPTION, Container_Impl::install
> > 
> > user exception, ID 'IDL:Deployment/UnknownImplId:1.0'
> > (32106|3073791680) EXCEPTION, CIAO_NodeApplication::install error
> > 
> > user exception, ID 'IDL:Deployment/UnknownImplId:1.0'
> > (32100|3073631936) EXCEPTION,
DomainApplicationManager_Impl::startLaunch
> > 
> > user exception, ID 'IDL:Deployment/StartError:1.0'
> > EXCEPTION: StartError exception caught:
> > Session_Container::ciao_install_home, Failed to open executor DLL:
> > ARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec
> > (32104|3052955328) Plan_Launcher: Unknown exception.
> > ERROR:
> > </usr/local/ACE_wrappers/TAO/CIAO/DAnCE/Plan_Launcher/plan_launcher>
> > failed: Arquivo ou diret�rio n�o encontrado
> 
> Most probably, you are having some linker errors. You must be having 
> some unresolved references, when your linker ran.
> 
> "ldd -r" should give you a better picture.
> 
> Please let us know if you have any more questions.
> 
> Thanks,
>       Jai


0
Sandro
2/10/2006 6:03:51 PM
comp.soft-sys.ace 20326 articles. 1 followers. marlow.andrew (167) is leader. Post Follow

3 Replies
343 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 54

Hi Sandro,

I took a look at the linker errors you copied in your e-mail.

It looks to me that you are missing to link the stub library when you 
create the executor library.

Another error i noticed is that there may be a typo in your 
platform_macros.GNU file:

You are mentioningh about adding:

no-hidden-visitibility=1

in your platform_macro.GNu file,

but it should be

no-hidden-visibility=1

Can you please let me know if these fix your errors?

If not, can you please send us your example as a zip or a tar file, so 
that we can take a look at that?

Thanks,
	Jai

0
Jaiganesh
2/10/2006 6:10:12 PM
Hi Jai,

Its working now.
The no-hidden-visibility must be included BEFORE the conventional
platform-xxx.GNU include. I was using it AFTER.

Just to be curious, why must it be before ? If the included
platform-xxx.GNU file define this setting I would not override it if a
put this AFTER the conventional include ?

Thanks,
Sandro

Em Sex, 2006-02-10 �s 12:08 -0600, Jaiganesh Balasubramanian escreveu:
> Hi Sandro,
> 
> I took a look at the linker errors you copied in your e-mail.
> 
> It looks to me that you are missing to link the stub library when you 
> create the executor library.
> 
> Another error i noticed is that there may be a typo in your 
> platform_macros.GNU file:
> 
> You are mentioningh about adding:
> 
> no-hidden-visitibility=1
> 
> in your platform_macro.GNu file,
> 
> but it should be
> 
> no-hidden-visibility=1
> 
> Can you please let me know if these fix your errors?
> 
> If not, can you please send us your example as a zip or a tar file, so 
> that we can take a look at that?
> 
> Thanks,
> 	Jai















0
Sandro
2/10/2006 6:44:03 PM
Hi Sandro,

>> Its working now.

Great!

>> The no-hidden-visibility must be included BEFORE the conventional
>> platform-xxx.GNU include. I was using it AFTER.
>> 
>> Just to be curious, why must it be before ? If the included
>> platform-xxx.GNU file define this setting I would not override it if a
>> put this AFTER the conventional include ?

This is a good question.  Ossama et al., do you guys know the answer
to this?

Thanks,

Doug

>> Thanks,
>> Sandro
>> 
>> Em Sex, 2006-02-10 �s 12:08 -0600, Jaiganesh Balasubramanian escreveu:
>> > Hi Sandro,
>> > 
>> > I took a look at the linker errors you copied in your e-mail.
>> > 
>> > It looks to me that you are missing to link the stub library when you 
>> > create the executor library.
>> > 
>> > Another error i noticed is that there may be a typo in your 
>> > platform_macros.GNU file:
>> > 
>> > You are mentioningh about adding:
>> > 
>> > no-hidden-visitibility=1
>> > 
>> > in your platform_macro.GNu file,
>> > 
>> > but it should be
>> > 
>> > no-hidden-visibility=1
>> > 
>> > Can you please let me know if these fix your errors?
>> > 
>> > If not, can you please send us your example as a zip or a tar file, so 
>> > that we can take a look at that?
>> > 
>> > Thanks,
>> > 	Jai
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 





































-- 
Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt                       Professor and Associate Chair
Electrical Engineering and Computer Science  TEL: (615) 343-8197
Institute for Software Integrated Systems    WEB: www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/~schmidt
Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN, 37203   NET: d.schmidt@vanderbilt.edu

0
Douglas
2/11/2006 4:39:39 PM
Reply:

Similar Artilces:

Re: [ciao-users] Deployment error in CIAO 0.4.9
Hi Jai and Gan, Gan, the XML descriptor contains the right entry point in the <location> tag. Jai, indeed, running 'ldd -r' I get many undefined symbols, for example: .... undefined symbol: _ZTIN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicitE (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicit5_is_aEPKc (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZNK5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicit24_interface_repository_idEv (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicit7marshalER13TAO_OutputCDR (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicitD1Ev (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicitD0Ev (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZTv0_n12_N5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicitD1Ev (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZTv0_n12_N5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicitD0Ev (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZTv0_n16_N5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicit5_is_aEPKc (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZTv0_n20_NK5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicit24_interface_repository_idEv (./libARCOSDAI...

[ciao-users] Utility library not being found on ACE/TAO/CIAO 5.4.2/1.4.2/0.4.2
Hello again, I am still attempting to install BBN's quo system and I was just informed that I should use ACE/TAO/CIAO 5.4.2/1.4.2/0.4.2. This is the reason for using an older version. CIAO VERSION: 0.4.2 TAO VERSION : 1.4.2 ACE VERSION : 5.4.2 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: Dell Dimension 8100 w/ Gentoo Linux (2.6 kernel) TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: CCF library DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT: COMPILATION? If so, what do your $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h: // -*- C++ -*- // // config-linux.h,v 4.41 2004/04/22 20:54:00 shuston Exp // The following configuration file is designed to work for Linux // platforms using GNU C++. #ifndef ACE_CONFIG_LINUX_H #define ACE_CONFIG_LINUX_H #include /**/ "ace/pre.h" #define ACE_PLATFORM_CONFIG config-linux.h #include "ace/config-linux-common.h" #define ACE_HAS_SVR4_DYNAMIC_LINKING #define ACE_HAS_AUTOMATIC_INIT_FINI #define ACE_HAS_DLSYM_SEGFAULT_ON_INVALID_HANDLE #if !defined (ACE_MT_SAFE) #define ACE_MT_SAFE 1 // JCEJ 12/22/96 #1 #endif #if ACE_MT_SAFE // Yes, we do have threads. #define ACE_HAS_THREADS // And they're even POSIX pthreads (LinuxThreads implementation) #define ACE_HAS_PTHREADS // ... and the final standard even! #define ACE_HAS_PTHREADS_STD ...

[ciao-users] Announcing the release of the new beta (ACE-5.4.9, TAO-1.4.9 and CIAO-0.4.9)
Hi, We are pleased to announce a new beta of ACE-5.4.9, TAO-1.4.9, and CIAO-0.4.9. The documentation for this beta kit will be available shortly. We are still working very hard on the x.5 release, which is scheduled to be released by the beginning of March if all goes well. We wanted to get this new beta out to fix several important bugs reported by our users, which we greatly appreciate, as always. We've also added a number of improvements to the various components in ACE, TAO and CIAO. As usual the latest release is available at: http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html The doxygen documentation for the beta is also available. We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your applications, and let us know if you encounter any problems. Please use the: $ACE_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $TAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $CIAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM so that we have the version/platform/compiler/options you're using to report problems. We also request that you take a look at $TAO_ROOT/docs/releasenotes for the status of various ongoing projects at the DOC groups of WashU, UCI, and Vanderbilt to move ACE+TAO+CIAO forward. Overviews of our recent progress and upcoming plans are available at $ACE_ROOT/NEWS $TAO_ROOT/NEWS $CIAO_ROOT/NEWS The overall success rates for the test results gathered from all our daily builds is 95.68% for the ACE tests and 88.6% for the TAO tests. Please see http://www.dre.v...

[ciao-users] Deployment error in CIAO 0.4.9
CIAO VERSION: 0.4.9 TAO VERSION : 1.4.9 ACE VERSION : 5.4.9 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: Linux beethoven 2.6.11-kanotix-7 #1 Mon Jul 4 09:50:39 BRT 2005 i686 GNU/Linux THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h FILE [if you use a link to a platform- specific file, simply state which one]: config-linux.h THE $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU FILE [if you use a link to a platform-specific file, simply state which one (unless this isn't used in this case, e.g., with Microsoft Visual C++)]: platform_linux.GNU AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: my own application DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT: COMPILATION? No LINKING? No EXECUTION? No OTHER (please specify)? Deployment [Please indicate whether ACE/TAO/CIAO, your application, or both are affected.] SYNOPSIS: my deployment occurs fine in CIAO 0.4.8 but presents an error in CIAO 0.4.9. DESCRIPTION: when deploying my assembly in CIAO 0.4.9 I get the following error: CIAO (32106|3073791680) Container_Base.cpp -Session_Container::ciao_install_home -ERROR in opening the executor DLL [ARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec] (32106|3073791680) EXCEPTION, Container_Impl::install user exception, ID 'IDL:Deployment/UnknownImplId:1.0' (32106|3073791680) EXCEPTION, CIAO_NodeApplication::install error user exception, ID 'IDL:Deployment/UnknownImplId:1.0' (32100|3073631936) EXCEPTION, DomainApplicationMa...

RE: [tao-users] Re: [ace-users] Re: Announcing the release of the new beta (ACE-5.4.10, TAO-1.4.10 and CIAO-0.4.10)
Hi, > > >> We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your > > >> applications, and let us know soon if you encounter any problems > > >> since we plan to cut the x.5 release by February 28th. > > > > As per Wallace's comments, we have an aggressive schedule > for the x.5 > > release to meet the needs of some major sponsors. If > people can give > > x.4.10 a "test drive" in the next couple of days and report problems > > they encounter we'll try to ensure that we fix any > showstoppers before > > According to bugzilla bug 2323 is not fixed yet. > > http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2323 > > For us it is a show stopper. We use the OCI version which does not > have problems related to this bug but it would be nice to be able to > use the latest version with more fixes. FYI, the reason that this test now fails is because Ossama added several new test cases which wheren't in the test in the past, this uncovered some bugs which according to our information where already there a long time. Johnny "Johnny Willemsen" <jwillemsen@remedy.nl> writes: > > > >> We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your > > > >> applications, and let us know soon if you encounter any problems > > > >> sinc...

RE: [ciao-users] tao_idl invocation error on ciao 0.4.7 #2
Hi, Ok, this is really strange. We build TAO_IDL daily and don't have seen this problem. Maybe you can try to rebuild x.4.7 in a complete fresh tree. Johnny > -----Original Message----- > From: Friedhelm Wolf [mailto:Friedhelm.wolf@gmx.de] > Sent: woensdag 17 augustus 2005 10:54 > To: jwillemsen@remedy.nl > Cc: ciao-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: Re: [ciao-users] tao_idl invocation error on ciao 0.4.7 > > Hi, > > I use Version 7.1 ( 2003 ). Sorry for beeing imprecise. > > Regards, > Friedhelm > > Johnny Willemsen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for using the PRF form. Do you use VC7 or VC7.1 > (also called 2003). > > The vc7 version is broken and is not supported. > > > > Johnny > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: owner-ciao-users@cse.wustl.edu > >>[mailto:owner-ciao-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Friedhelm Wolf > >>Sent: woensdag 17 augustus 2005 10:27 > >>To: ciao-users@cs.wustl.edu > >>Subject: [ciao-users] tao_idl invocation error on ciao 0.4.7 > >> > >> CIAO VERSION: 0.4.7 > >> TAO VERSION : 1.4.7 > >> ACE VERSION : 5.4.7 > >> > >> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > >> Win XP Professional, Winsock 3.10.0.103 > >> > >> THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h ...

[ace-users] Announcing the release of the new beta (ACE-5.4.9, TAO-1.4.9 and CIAO-0.4.9)
Hi, We are pleased to announce a new beta of ACE-5.4.9, TAO-1.4.9, and CIAO-0.4.9. The documentation for this beta kit will be available shortly. We are still working very hard on the x.5 release, which is scheduled to be released by the beginning of March if all goes well. We wanted to get this new beta out to fix several important bugs reported by our users, which we greatly appreciate, as always. We've also added a number of improvements to the various components in ACE, TAO and CIAO. As usual the latest release is available at: http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html The doxygen documentation for the beta is also available. We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your applications, and let us know if you encounter any problems. Please use the: $ACE_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $TAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $CIAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM so that we have the version/platform/compiler/options you're using to report problems. We also request that you take a look at $TAO_ROOT/docs/releasenotes for the status of various ongoing projects at the DOC groups of WashU, UCI, and Vanderbilt to move ACE+TAO+CIAO forward. Overviews of our recent progress and upcoming plans are available at $ACE_ROOT/NEWS $TAO_ROOT/NEWS $CIAO_ROOT/NEWS The overall success rates for the test results gathered from all our daily builds is 95.68% for the ACE tests and 88.6% for the TAO tests. Please see http://www.dr...

[ciao-users] Deployment error in CIAO 0.5.4 ...
------=_Part_78991_4291641.1164311410838 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline CIAO VERSION: 0.5.4 TAO VERSION : 1.5.4 ACE VERSION : 5.5.4 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: Linux lamport 2.6.11-kanotix-7 #1 Mon Jul 4 09:50:39 BRT 2005 i686 GNU/Linux COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): Using built-in specs. Target: i486-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f95,objc,ada,treelang --prefix=/usr --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --enable-nls --program-suffix=- 4.0 --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-java-awt=gtk-default --enable-gtk-cairo --with-java-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4.0-1.4.2.0/jre --enable-mpfr --disable-werror --with-tune=i686 --enable-checking=release i486-linux-gnu Thread model: posix gcc version 4.0.4 20060507 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.3-3) THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h FILE [if you use a link to a platform- specific file, simply state which one]: config-linux.h THE $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU FILE [if you use a link to a platform-specific file, simply state which one (unless this isn't used in this case, e.g., with Microsoft Visual C++)]: no_hidden_visibility=1 include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_linux...

[tao-users] Announcing the release of the new beta (ACE-5.4.9, TAO-1.4.9 and CIAO-0.4.9)
Hi, We are pleased to announce a new beta of ACE-5.4.9, TAO-1.4.9, and CIAO-0.4.9. The documentation for this beta kit will be available shortly. We are still working very hard on the x.5 release, which is scheduled to be released by the beginning of March if all goes well. We wanted to get this new beta out to fix several important bugs reported by our users, which we greatly appreciate, as always. We've also added a number of improvements to the various components in ACE, TAO and CIAO. As usual the latest release is available at: http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html The doxygen documentation for the beta is also available. We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your applications, and let us know if you encounter any problems. Please use the: $ACE_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $TAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $CIAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM so that we have the version/platform/compiler/options you're using to report problems. We also request that you take a look at $TAO_ROOT/docs/releasenotes for the status of various ongoing projects at the DOC groups of WashU, UCI, and Vanderbilt to move ACE+TAO+CIAO forward. Overviews of our recent progress and upcoming plans are available at $ACE_ROOT/NEWS $TAO_ROOT/NEWS $CIAO_ROOT/NEWS The overall success rates for the test results gathered from all our daily builds is 95.68% for the ACE tests and 88.6% for the TAO tests. Please see http://www.dre.v...

Re: [ace-users] Errors while compiling c++ 3.4.2
Hi Eyal, I believe we've fixed these problems in the latest version of ACE that's tucked inside our CVS repository. Can you please take a look at this version available in http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html and see if things work better. If not, please let us know so we can fix them before we release ACE 5.4.3 in a week or so. Thanks, Doug >> I get the following while compiling: >> >> /usr/bin/c++ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199506L -DNDEBUG -DUSING_GCC >> -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -DLINUX -I../inc >> -I../3rd_party...

Re: [ciao-users] Hello error with CIAO 0.4.3
Hi > I'm using CIAO CIDL compiler 0.4.2 that I got from > http://www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/cidlc/binary/windows/i386/cidlc-2004-09-13.zip. > Does this help? You need to be using the 0.4.3 of the executable. > Actually I'm just looking for a stable version of CIAO that does not > need the *EI.idl step when building CIAO components. If this one does > not work out properly, which version am I supposed to use? I'm asking > because I don't want to waste too much time building the whole project, > which takes quite a while, :-). Just use the new CIDLC executable and recompile your servant and executor. Thanks bala On Wednesday, 19 January, 2005 at 11:24:18 -0600, xiongm wrote: > Thanks, bala. I've got everything figured out. It was exactly because of > the CIDL compiler version. Cool! Good to know that things work. Thanks bala > > Balachandran Natarajan wrote: > > >Hi > > > > > > > >> I'm using CIAO CIDL compiler 0.4.2 that I got from > >>http://www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/cidlc/binary/windows/i386/cidlc-2004-09-13.zip. > >>Does this help? > >> > >> > > > >You need to be using the 0.4.3 of the executable. > > > > > > > >> Actually I'm just looking for a stable version of CIAO that does not > >&...

RE: [ciao-users] tao_idl invocation error on ciao 0.4.7
Hi, Thanks for using the PRF form. Do you use VC7 or VC7.1 (also called 2003). The vc7 version is broken and is not supported. Johnny > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ciao-users@cse.wustl.edu > [mailto:owner-ciao-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Friedhelm Wolf > Sent: woensdag 17 augustus 2005 10:27 > To: ciao-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: [ciao-users] tao_idl invocation error on ciao 0.4.7 > > CIAO VERSION: 0.4.7 > TAO VERSION : 1.4.7 > ACE VERSION : 5.4.7 > > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > Win XP Professional, Winsock 3.10.0.103 > > THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h FILE: > #include "config-win32.h" > > CONTENTS OF > $ACE_ROOT/bin/MakeProjectCreator/config/default.features > (used by MPC when you generate your own makefiles): > ssl=0 > qos=1 > cidl=1 > rwho=0 > sctp=0 > boost=1 > > AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: > Building and Execution of tao_idl with Visual Studio 7. > > DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT: > EXECUTION? > > SYNOPSIS: > Execution of the tao_idl 1.4.7 compiler ends up in an Error. > > DESCRIPTION: > I downloaded the latest ACE/TAO/CIAO Version x.4.7. > I'm using Visual Studio 7 to build ACE successfully. > When building TAO, the TAO lib and the TAO IDL Compiler > builds without erro...

RE: [ace-users] ACE+TAO+CIAO
Hi, Please use the prf form and which configuration you build. I personally think you have an old version of ACE/TAO on the system that is used. Regards, Johnny > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu > [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Domingos Monteiro > Sent: donderdag 9 juni 2005 18:05 > To: Simon McQueen > Cc: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: Re: [ace-users] ACE+TAO+CIAO - 5.4.6 + 1.4.6 + 0.4.6 released > > Hi, > > I've just dowloaded this version > I've started to compile ACE with > - MSVC 7.1 > - Win XP > And get the following link errors: > > Message_Block.obj : error LNK2005: "public: virtual void __thiscall > ACE_Deadline_Message_Strategy::convert_priority(class ACE_Time_Value > &,class ACE_Message_Block const &)" > (?convert_priority@ACE_Deadline_Message_Strategy@@UAEXAAVACE_T > ime_Value@@ABVACE_Message_Block@@@Z) > already defined in CDR_Size.obj > Message_Block.obj : error LNK2005: "public: virtual void __thiscall > ACE_Laxity_Message_Strategy::convert_priority(class ACE_Time_Value > &,class ACE_Message_Block const &)" > (?convert_priority@ACE_Laxity_Message_Strategy@@UAEXAAVACE_Tim > e_Value@@ABVACE_Message_Block@@@Z) > already defined in CDR_Size.obj > SString.obj : error LNK2005: "public: __thiscall > ACE_NS_WString::ACE_N...

[ace-users] Re: a little bug of ACE-5.4.1+TAO-1.4.1+CIAO-0.4.1.tar.gz
Hi Adam, Please upgrade to ACE+TAO x.4.8, which you can download from http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html under the heading "latest beta kit". The DOC groups at Washington University, UC Irvine, and Vanderbilt University only provide "best effort" support for non-sponsors for the latest beta kit, as described in http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/docs/ACE-bug-process.html Thus, if you need more "predictable" help for ACE 5.4.1, I recommend that you check out http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/commercial-support.html for a list of companies that will provide you with ACE+TAO commercial support. Thanks, Doug >> When I compile this version, it prompts me the following errors that >> /*------ >> gmake[6]: *** No rule to make target `Client_Request_Interceptor.cpp', >> needed by `.obj/Client_Request_Interceptor.o'. Stop. >> ------*/ >> >> Then I find there is something wrong about the directory: >> /export/home/adam/ace.5.4.1.cc.64/TAO/tests/Portable_Interceptors/Request_Interceptor_Flow >> There are two files whose file names suffix are very strange. >> 1. Client_Request_Interceptor.cp >> 2. Server_Request_Interceptor.cp >> After I rename them from .cp to .cpp >> >> I wonder if this is a bug or some thing I configure wrong? >> >> Regards, >> Adam >> -...

Re: [ciao-users] Errors running Hello example in CIAO 0.5.7 #2
Hi William, <br> <br>Sorry to bother you again. <br> <br>I followed your instructions and executed the following steps: <br> <br>1) Setted debug to 1 and optime to 0 in platform_macros.GNU and the file content is now: <br>no_hidden_visibility=1 <br>debug=1 <br>optimize=0 <br>include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_linux.GNU <br> <br>2) Rebuilt CIAO <br>3) Installed gdb version 6.6 <br>4) Set CIAO_DEBUG to 11 and executed ulimit -c unlimited in the consoles I used to execute run_NodeDaemons, ExecutionManager and PlanLauncher. <br> <br>Below is the result of these executions: <br> <br>1) <br> <br>$/usr/local/ACE_wrappers/TAO/CIAO/examples/Hello/descriptors$ perl run_NodeDaemons.pl <br>CIAO_NodeManager IOR: IOR:010000001f00000049444c3a4349414f2f4e6f64654d616e616765724461656d6f6e3a312e300000010000000000000068000000010102000a0000006c6f63616c686f73740061ea1b00000014010f00525354da5c35462f4a0c000000000001000000010000000002000000000000000800000001000000004f41540100000018000000010000000100010001000000010001050901010000000000 <br>CIAO_NodeManager is running... <br>CIAO_NodeManager IOR: IOR:010000001f00000049444c3a4349414f2f4e6f64654d616e616765724461656d6f6e3a312e300000010000000000000068000000010102000a0000006c6f63616c686f73740062ea1b00000014010f00525354da5c3546c12d0e000000000001000000010000000002000000000000000800000001...

Re: [ciao-users] Problems with CIAO 0.4.3 Quickbuild, using CIAOTAO.mwc #2
Hi > Hi, > > you were right. Somehow in my Visual Studio there was set a path > to my nmake build and so the wrong tao_idl.exe and other dll's > were used. This lead to a little bit of trouble. > > I thank you for your advice. Cool! Glad to know that things worked. I am just CC'ing this to the users group so that users are aware (at a later date when they do a group search) of the results of the discussion. Thanks bala ...

[ciao-users] Much better component deployment speed on ACE+TAO+CIAO 6.2.4
Hi All, Just as a matter of interest, I recently updated ACE+TAO+CIAO from 6.1.9 to 6.2.4 and noticed a HUGE improvement in the speed of component deployment using DAnCE. Deploying 6 components used to take about 10sec in 6.1.9 but it has dropped to less than 1 sec in 6.2.4. How was this improvement obtained? Regards, Hartmut ...

Re: [ciao-users] Core dump file content
Hi William, <br> <br>I'll try to figure what it's happening with my machine configuration. <br> <br>When I said that my messages got lost in the way I didn't mean to say that my messages were taking to much time to be answered. What I really mean is that some of my messages did not reach the CIAO mailing list in the past. I'm aware that you do your best to support us. <br> <br>Thank you again. <br> <br>Santos <br>---------[ Received Mail Content ]---------- <br> <br> Subject : Re: [ciao-users] Core dump file content - Error running Hello example in CIAO 0. <br> <br> Date : Tue, 01 May 2007 14:49:58 -0500 <br> <br> From : "William R. Otte" <wotte@dre.vanderbilt.edu> <br> <br> To : "CIAO Users Mailing List" <ciao-users@cse.wustl.edu> <br> <br> <br> <br>Hi Santos - <br> <br> <br> <br>On Tue, 01 May 2007 14:19:19 -0500, san tos wrote: <br> <br> <br> <br>> Hi Matt, <br> <br>> <br> <br>> It follows the output I'm having with gdb: <br> <br>> <br> <br>> GNU gdb 6.4.90-debian <br> <br>> Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. <br> <br>> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you <br>...

[ciao-users] ACE+TAO+CIAO
Hi, We are pleased to announce a new beta of ACE-5.4.5, TAO-1.4.5 and CIAO-0.4.5. This beta contains a number of time/space optimizations, including POA/Skeleton refactoring and TypeCode reimplementation. It also fixes a number of important bugs reported by our users, which we greatly appreciate, as always. As usual the latest release is available at: http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html The doxygen documentation for the beta will be updated in the next few hours! We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your applications, and let us know if you encounter any problems. As always, please use the: $ACE_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $TAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $CIAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM so that we have the version/platform/compiler/options you're using to report problems. We also request that you take a look at $TAO_ROOT/docs/releasenotes $CIAO_ROOT/docs/releasenotes for the status of various ongoing projects at the DOC groups of WashU, UCI, and Vanderbilt to move ACE+TAO+CIAO forward. Overviews of our recent progress and upcoming plans are available at $ACE_ROOT/NEWS $TAO_ROOT/NEWS $CIAO_ROOT/NEWS The overall succeeded test results gathered from all our daily builds is 98% for the ACE tests and 93% for the TAO tests. Please see http://www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/scoreboard/ for a summary of these tests. Our goal is to get these tests close to 100% for the next major release (i.e., ACE 6.0,...

[ciao-users] ACE+TAO+CIAO
Hi, We are pleased to announce a new beta of ACE-5.4.6, TAO-1.4.6 and CIAO-0.4.6. Since the x.4.5 beta had so many changes and improvements, we wanted to get this new beta out quickly to fix several important bugs reported by our users, which we greatly appreciate, as always. As usual the latest release is available at: http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html The doxygen documentation for the beta will be updated in the next few hours. We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your applications, and let us know if you encounter any problems. As always, please use the: $ACE_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $TAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $CIAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM so that we have the version/platform/compiler/options you're using to report problems. We also request that you take a look at $TAO_ROOT/docs/releasenotes $CIAO_ROOT/docs/releasenotes for the status of various ongoing projects at the DOC groups of WashU, UCI, and Vanderbilt to move ACE+TAO+CIAO forward. Overviews of our recent progress and upcoming plans are available at $ACE_ROOT/NEWS $TAO_ROOT/NEWS $CIAO_ROOT/NEWS The overall success rates for the test results gathered from all our daily builds is 98% for the ACE tests and 94% for the TAO tests. Please see http://www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/scoreboard/ for a summary of these tests. Our goal is to get these tests close to 100% for the next major release (i.e., ACE 6.0, TAO 2.0, and C...

[ciao-users] ACE+TAO+CIAO
Hi, We are pleased to announce a new beta of ACE-5.4.7, TAO-1.4.7 and CIAO-0.4.7. Since the x.4.6 beta had so many changes and improvements, we wanted to get this new beta out quickly to fix several important bugs reported by our users, which we greatly appreciate, as always. We've also added a number of subsetting improvements that reduce the static/dynamic footprint of ACE+TAO significantly. As usual the latest release is available at: http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html The doxygen documentation for the beta is also available. We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your applications, and let us know if you encounter any problems. As always, please use the: $ACE_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $TAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $CIAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM so that we have the version/platform/compiler/options you're using to report problems. We also request that you take a look at $TAO_ROOT/docs/releasenotes $CIAO_ROOT/docs/releasenotes for the status of various ongoing projects at the DOC groups of WashU, UCI, and Vanderbilt to move ACE+TAO+CIAO forward. Overviews of our recent progress and upcoming plans are available at $ACE_ROOT/NEWS $TAO_ROOT/NEWS $CIAO_ROOT/NEWS The overall success rates for the test results gathered from all our daily builds is 98% for the ACE tests and 95% for the TAO tests. Please see http://www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/scoreboard/ for a summary of these tests...

[ciao-users] Announcing the release of the new beta (ACE-5.4.8, TAO-1.4.8 and CIAO-0.4.8)
[The following is on behalf of the PrismTech build-czars!] Hi, We are pleased to announce a new beta of ACE-5.4.8, TAO-1.4.8, and CIAO-0.4.8. We are currently working hard on the long-awaited x.5 release, which is slated to appear in early 2006. We therefore wanted to get this new beta out to fix several important bugs reported by our users, which we greatly appreciate as always. We've added a number of sub-setting improvements that reduce the static/dynamic footprint of ACE+TAO significantly (www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/Stats has all the details). We've also finally added support for Real-time CCM to CIAO and DAnCE. This beta is contains the results of our major footprint reduction effort that started in the summer of 2004. Between August 1st 2004 and October 14th 2005 the footprint reduction for the ORB_Init application has been 20%. Dependent on the parts of TAO you use the reduction can even be more. This reduction is inclusive all the extensions that have been made to TAO the last year. Interested users should check out http://www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/Stats/ for more details. Note that the footprint has increased slightly again due to emulated exceptions having been disabled in favour of native C++ exceptions in all stats builds. We have deprecated support for emulated exceptions since there are no sponsors for this configuration. If you require emulated exceptions please contact one of the companies listed in http://w...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Johnny- > Ok, the problem is in platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU, when a not known forte > version is found, it defaults to explicit. I am updating right now, for 4.2 > and 5.3 we default to explicit, for all others to implicit Is this necessary? I mean make it implicit by default. The explicit is not even supported, and has no chance to work cleanly. Why should we patch broken stuff. Just a thought? > Qinghuajin and other Forte 9 users, you can work around this by added the > following line to your platform_macros.GNU file. > templates = implicit This is until w...

Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2
Hi Jin, Thanks for using the PRF. >> ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 >> >> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: >> Solaris 10 x86 >> >> TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: >> COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): >> Sun Studio 9 (Sun CC 5.6) As we've mentioned several times now, we don't have this compiler installed yet on this hardware platform, so if you want things to be fixed soon I recommend you figure out what's going wrong and send us the patches. Otherwise, pl...

Web resources about - Re: [ciao-users] Deployment error in CIAO 0.4.9 #2 - comp.soft-sys.ace

Resources last updated: 3/5/2016 9:50:25 AM