f



Re: [ciao-users] Hello error with CIAO 0.4.3

Hi

>     I'm using CIAO CIDL compiler 0.4.2 that I got from 
> http://www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/cidlc/binary/windows/i386/cidlc-2004-09-13.zip. 
> Does this help?

You need to be using the 0.4.3 of the executable. 

>     Actually I'm just looking for a stable version of CIAO that does not 
> need the *EI.idl  step when building CIAO components. If this one does 
> not work out properly, which version am I supposed to use? I'm asking 
> because I don't want to waste too much time building the whole project, 
> which takes quite a while, :-).

Just use the new CIDLC executable and recompile your servant and
executor. 

Thanks
bala

0
bala
1/19/2005 4:56:19 PM
comp.soft-sys.ace 20326 articles. 1 followers. marlow.andrew (167) is leader. Post Follow

1 Replies
335 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 11

On Wednesday, 19 January, 2005 at 11:24:18 -0600, xiongm wrote:
 > Thanks, bala. I've got everything figured out. It was exactly because of 
 > the CIDL compiler version.

Cool! Good to know that things work. 

Thanks
bala

 > 
 > Balachandran Natarajan wrote:
 > 
 > >Hi
 > >
 > >  
 > >
 > >>    I'm using CIAO CIDL compiler 0.4.2 that I got from 
 > >>http://www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/cidlc/binary/windows/i386/cidlc-2004-09-13.zip. 
 > >>Does this help?
 > >>    
 > >>
 > >
 > >You need to be using the 0.4.3 of the executable. 
 > >
 > >  
 > >
 > >>    Actually I'm just looking for a stable version of CIAO that does not 
 > >>need the *EI.idl  step when building CIAO components. If this one does 
 > >>not work out properly, which version am I supposed to use? I'm asking 
 > >>because I don't want to waste too much time building the whole project, 
 > >>which takes quite a while, :-).
 > >>    
 > >>
 > >
 > >Just use the new CIDLC executable and recompile your servant and
 > >executor. 
 > >
 > >Thanks
 > >bala
 > >
 > >  
 > >

0
bala
1/19/2005 5:59:54 PM
Reply:

Similar Artilces:

[tao-users] Re: ACE+TAO+CIAO
Hi folks, It's been a long time (5 months) since we put out the x.4.2 ACE+TAO+CIAO beta, and the current x.4.3 beta contains many improvements, fixes, and new features. It would be great if you could put this through its paces and let us know what problems you find so we can fix them ASAP. We plan to release the x.4.4 beta fairly soon (i.e., within a month), so your thorough testing will greatly improve its stability and portabilty! Thanks very much, Doug >> Since this is the season of giving, we are happy to announce a new beta >> of ACE-5....

[ciao-users] Hello error with CIAO 0.4.3
Hi, I have the following problem when running the hello sample program ACE version 5.4.3, released Thu Dec 30 13:21:37 2004 TAO version 1.4.3, released Thu Dec 30 13:22:25 2004 CIAO version 0.4.3, released Thu Dec 30 13:24:16 2004. OPERATING SYSTEM: WindowsXP COMPILER NAME AND VERSION: VC7.1 SYNOPSIS: I compiled all the components for Hello successfully, and followed all steps described in step-by-step.html,i.e., * 1. |${CIAO_ROOT}/tools/Daemon/CIAO_Daemon -ORBEndpoint iiop://localhost:20000 -n ${CIAO_ROOT}/tools/ComponentServer/ComponentServer | * 2. |${CIAO_ROOT}/tools/Assembly_Deployer/Assembly_Manager -o ior -c test.dat| * 3. |${CIAO_ROOT}/tools/Assembly_Deployer/Assembly_Deployer -k file://ior -a default.cad| I got the following error when doing step 3: Must specify to build or teardown an assembly using -o or -d flag This option was not required for previous release, and it's not mentioned in the step-by-step instructions. so I use the following comand |${CIAO_ROOT}/tools/Assembly_Deployer/Assembly_Deployer -k file://ior -a default.cad -o default.log| Then I got the following error at the window running daemon: .............................. CIAO_Daemon is running................ 1240|2484> creating SenderHome ACE_ASSERT: file .\Servant_Impl_Base.cpp, line 11 assertion failed for '0', aborting... This application has re...

RE: [tao-users] Re: [ace-users] Re: Announcing the release of the new beta (ACE-5.4.10, TAO-1.4.10 and CIAO-0.4.10)
Hi, > > >> We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your > > >> applications, and let us know soon if you encounter any problems > > >> since we plan to cut the x.5 release by February 28th. > > > > As per Wallace's comments, we have an aggressive schedule > for the x.5 > > release to meet the needs of some major sponsors. If > people can give > > x.4.10 a "test drive" in the next couple of days and report problems > > they encounter we'll try to ensure that we fix any > showstoppers before > > According to bugzilla bug 2323 is not fixed yet. > > http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2323 > > For us it is a show stopper. We use the OCI version which does not > have problems related to this bug but it would be nice to be able to > use the latest version with more fixes. FYI, the reason that this test now fails is because Ossama added several new test cases which wheren't in the test in the past, this uncovered some bugs which according to our information where already there a long time. Johnny "Johnny Willemsen" <jwillemsen@remedy.nl> writes: > > > >> We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your > > > >> applications, and let us know soon if you encounter any problems > > > >> sinc...

Re: [ace-users] Errors while compiling c++ 3.4.2
Hi Eyal, I believe we've fixed these problems in the latest version of ACE that's tucked inside our CVS repository. Can you please take a look at this version available in http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html and see if things work better. If not, please let us know so we can fix them before we release ACE 5.4.3 in a week or so. Thanks, Doug >> I get the following while compiling: >> >> /usr/bin/c++ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199506L -DNDEBUG -DUSING_GCC >> -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -DLINUX -I../inc >> -I../3rd_party...

Re: [tao-users] [ciao-users] Errors running Hello example in CIAO 0.5.7
Hi William, <br> <br>Sorry to bother you again. <br> <br>I followed your instructions and executed the following steps: <br> <br>1) Setted debug to 1 and optime to 0 in platform_macros.GNU and the file content is now: <br>no_hidden_visibility=1 <br>debug=1 <br>optimize=0 <br>include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_linux.GNU <br> <br>2) Rebuilt CIAO <br>3) Installed gdb version 6.6 <br>4) Set CIAO_DEBUG to 11 and executed ulimit -c unlimited in the consoles I used to execute run_NodeDaemons, ExecutionManager and PlanLauncher. <br> <br>Below is the result of these executions: <br> <br>1) <br> <br>$/usr/local/ACE_wrappers/TAO/CIAO/examples/Hello/descriptors$ perl run_NodeDaemons.pl <br>CIAO_NodeManager IOR: IOR:010000001f00000049444c3a4349414f2f4e6f64654d616e616765724461656d6f6e3a312e300000010000000000000068000000010102000a0000006c6f63616c686f73740061ea1b00000014010f00525354da5c35462f4a0c000000000001000000010000000002000000000000000800000001000000004f41540100000018000000010000000100010001000000010001050901010000000000 <br>CIAO_NodeManager is running... <br>CIAO_NodeManager IOR: IOR:010000001f00000049444c3a4349414f2f4e6f64654d616e616765724461656d6f6e3a312e300000010000000000000068000000010102000a0000006c6f63616c686f73740062ea1b00000014010f00525354da5c3546c12d0e000000000001000000010000000002000000000000000800000001...

RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3)
Hi Tom, > > > The "resolution" was to upgrade to ACE-5.4.3 or later, which has > > > code fixes to help with the newer compiler. Not sure how > much would > > > need to change, but you may be able to inspect the differences in > > > that part of the code wrt the newer ACE release to backport the > > > fixes. > > Thanks, I've downloaded and am building. Is ACE-5.4.3 the latest > > production release ? > > Well, the definition of "production release" for ACE is a bit murky > imho. Production release is one with 2 numbers. E.g., 5.4 > The developers on this list (almost) always recommend using the > latest package, which is typically labeled a "beta release". > The latest > would be 5.4.4. The developers always recommend *not* using the > "production release", since the next release labeled "beta" > is always a bug-fix-only release. I believe I qualify as a "developer", but have a different take. Production releases are tested well, and often better than the BFO beta. There may be fixes in BFO, but there may be additional bugs also - it happened at 5.4.1. For those wishing to adopt a version of ACE and stick with it, you'll need a version you can get support (fixes and advice) for. For example, Riverace supports releases (e.g., 5.4) and fix kits that Riverace releases for those (i...

RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3) #2
Hi Colm, Ok, thanks for that explanation. I solved this a different way for a similar problem that showed up with Visual Age C++ on AIX 5.2... When the 5.4.5 beta comes out, please try this again and hopefully no further workarounds will be needed. Thanks, -Steve -- Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation Adding Service to Open Source Software ACE book info at http://www.riverace.com/acebooks/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Colm McHugh [mailto:cmchugh@callixa.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 1:05 PM > To: Steve Huston > Cc: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: Re: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after > GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3) > > > > >Sure... Why do you say <sys/machine.h> is a prerequisite for > ><netinet/tcp.h>? I addressed a problem related to this in > the autoconf > >support for AIX that'll go in the next beta, but it doesn't involve > >machine.h. > > > Hi Steve, > > that statement is based on the compilation sequence shown > below (done on > an AIX 5.2): > > $ cat t2.cpp > #include <sys/machine.h> > #include <netinet/tcp.h> > int main() > {} > $ g++ t2.cpp > $ cat t1.cpp > #include <netinet/tcp.h> > int main() > {} > $ g++ t1.cpp > In file incl...

RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3) #2
Hi J.T., Right... The issue is a bit odd... Here's the check I added for ACE: dnl This check was added to work around a system-supplied header dnl (/usr/include/netinet/ip.h) that won't compile with Visual Age C++ dnl unless the _NO_BITFIELDS preprocessor macro is defined. The comments dnl there recommend use of _NO_BITFIELDS (and recode where needed to allow dnl that), but we won't just turn it on. Check to see if it's needed. Note dnl that this check is related to headers but done before we really know if dnl the header is present. Thus, if the bare compile fails, but succeeds dnl with _NO_BITFIELDS, set the flag, else leave things alone. -Steve -- Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation Adding Service to Open Source Software ACE book info at http://www.riverace.com/acebooks/ > -----Original Message----- > From: J.T. Conklin [mailto:jtc@acorntoolworks.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 2:21 PM > To: Colm McHugh > Cc: Steve Huston; ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: Re: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after > GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3) > > > Colm McHugh <cmchugh@callixa.com> writes: > >>Sure... Why do you say <sys/machine.h> is a prerequisite for > >><netinet/tcp.h>? I addressed a problem related to this in > the autoconf > >>support for AIX that'll go in the next beta, but it doesn't involve...

Re: [ciao-users] Deployment error in CIAO 0.4.9
Hi Jai and Gan, Gan, the XML descriptor contains the right entry point in the <location> tag. Jai, indeed, running 'ldd -r' I get many undefined symbols, for example: .... undefined symbol: _ZTIN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicitE (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicit5_is_aEPKc (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZNK5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicit24_interface_repository_idEv (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicit7marshalER13TAO_OutputCDR (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicitD1Ev (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicitD0Ev (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZTv0_n12_N5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicitD1Ev (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZTv0_n12_N5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicitD0Ev (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZTv0_n16_N5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicit5_is_aEPKc (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZTv0_n20_NK5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicit24_interface_repository_idEv (./libARCOSDAI...

Re: [ciao-users] Deployment error in CIAO 0.4.9 #2
Hi Jai and Gan, Gan, the XML descriptor contains the right entry point in the <location> tag. Jai, indeed, running 'ldd -r' I get many undefined symbols, for example: .... undefined symbol: _ZTIN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicitE (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicit5_is_aEPKc (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZNK5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicit24_interface_repository_idEv (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicit7marshalER13TAO_OutputCDR (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicitD1Ev (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZN5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicitD0Ev (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZTv0_n12_N5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicitD1Ev (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZTv0_n12_N5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicitD0Ev (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZTv0_n16_N5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicit5_is_aEPKc (./libARCOSDAISServer_DnC_exec.so) undefined symbol: _ZTv0_n20_NK5ARCOS15DataAcquisition31CCM_ARCOSDAISServerHomeImplicit24_interface_repository_idEv (./libARCOSDAISS...

RE: [ciao-users] tao_idl invocation error on ciao 0.4.7
Hi, Thanks for using the PRF form. Do you use VC7 or VC7.1 (also called 2003). The vc7 version is broken and is not supported. Johnny > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ciao-users@cse.wustl.edu > [mailto:owner-ciao-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Friedhelm Wolf > Sent: woensdag 17 augustus 2005 10:27 > To: ciao-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: [ciao-users] tao_idl invocation error on ciao 0.4.7 > > CIAO VERSION: 0.4.7 > TAO VERSION : 1.4.7 > ACE VERSION : 5.4.7 > > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > Win XP Professional, Winsock 3.10.0.103 > > THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h FILE: > #include "config-win32.h" > > CONTENTS OF > $ACE_ROOT/bin/MakeProjectCreator/config/default.features > (used by MPC when you generate your own makefiles): > ssl=0 > qos=1 > cidl=1 > rwho=0 > sctp=0 > boost=1 > > AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: > Building and Execution of tao_idl with Visual Studio 7. > > DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT: > EXECUTION? > > SYNOPSIS: > Execution of the tao_idl 1.4.7 compiler ends up in an Error. > > DESCRIPTION: > I downloaded the latest ACE/TAO/CIAO Version x.4.7. > I'm using Visual Studio 7 to build ACE successfully. > When building TAO, the TAO lib and the TAO IDL Compiler > builds without erro...

RE: [ace-users] ACE+TAO+CIAO
Hi, Please use the prf form and which configuration you build. I personally think you have an old version of ACE/TAO on the system that is used. Regards, Johnny > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu > [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Domingos Monteiro > Sent: donderdag 9 juni 2005 18:05 > To: Simon McQueen > Cc: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: Re: [ace-users] ACE+TAO+CIAO - 5.4.6 + 1.4.6 + 0.4.6 released > > Hi, > > I've just dowloaded this version > I've started to compile ACE with > - MSVC 7.1 > - Win XP > And get the following link errors: > > Message_Block.obj : error LNK2005: "public: virtual void __thiscall > ACE_Deadline_Message_Strategy::convert_priority(class ACE_Time_Value > &,class ACE_Message_Block const &)" > (?convert_priority@ACE_Deadline_Message_Strategy@@UAEXAAVACE_T > ime_Value@@ABVACE_Message_Block@@@Z) > already defined in CDR_Size.obj > Message_Block.obj : error LNK2005: "public: virtual void __thiscall > ACE_Laxity_Message_Strategy::convert_priority(class ACE_Time_Value > &,class ACE_Message_Block const &)" > (?convert_priority@ACE_Laxity_Message_Strategy@@UAEXAAVACE_Tim > e_Value@@ABVACE_Message_Block@@@Z) > already defined in CDR_Size.obj > SString.obj : error LNK2005: "public: __thiscall > ACE_NS_WString::ACE_N...

RE: [ciao-users] tao_idl invocation error on ciao 0.4.7 #2
Hi, Ok, this is really strange. We build TAO_IDL daily and don't have seen this problem. Maybe you can try to rebuild x.4.7 in a complete fresh tree. Johnny > -----Original Message----- > From: Friedhelm Wolf [mailto:Friedhelm.wolf@gmx.de] > Sent: woensdag 17 augustus 2005 10:54 > To: jwillemsen@remedy.nl > Cc: ciao-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: Re: [ciao-users] tao_idl invocation error on ciao 0.4.7 > > Hi, > > I use Version 7.1 ( 2003 ). Sorry for beeing imprecise. > > Regards, > Friedhelm > > Johnny Willemsen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for using the PRF form. Do you use VC7 or VC7.1 > (also called 2003). > > The vc7 version is broken and is not supported. > > > > Johnny > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: owner-ciao-users@cse.wustl.edu > >>[mailto:owner-ciao-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Friedhelm Wolf > >>Sent: woensdag 17 augustus 2005 10:27 > >>To: ciao-users@cs.wustl.edu > >>Subject: [ciao-users] tao_idl invocation error on ciao 0.4.7 > >> > >> CIAO VERSION: 0.4.7 > >> TAO VERSION : 1.4.7 > >> ACE VERSION : 5.4.7 > >> > >> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > >> Win XP Professional, Winsock 3.10.0.103 > >> > >> THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h ...

Re: [ciao-users] Errors running Hello example in CIAO 0.5.7
Hi William, <br> <br>Please give instructions of how to generate the stack trace. <br> <br>After set debug to 1 and optimize to 0 do I need to recompile only CIAO or I must recompile ACE and TAO too? <br> <br>Thank you very much for your help. <br> <br>Santos <br> <br>---------[ Received Mail Content ]---------- <br> <br> Subject : Re: [ciao-users] Errors running Hello example in CIAO 0.5.7 <br> <br> Date : Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:22:46 -0500 <br> <br> From : William Otte <wotte@dre.vanderbilt.edu> <br> <br> To : CIAO Users Mailing List <ciao-users@cse.wustl.edu> <br> <br> <br> <br>Hi Santos - <br> <br> <br> <br>Thanks for using the PRF! <br> <br> <br> <br>Could you please do two things for me: <br> <br> <br> <br>set the CIAO_DEBUG environment variable thusly: <br> <br> <br> <br>export CIAO_DEBUG=11 <br> <br> <br> <br>and re-run the test. <br> <br> <br> <br>Second, could you provide a stack trace for the program (probably the <br> <br>execution manager) that is segfaulting? If you don't know how to do <br> <br>this, please let me know and I can provide instructions. The stack <br> <br>trace will be...

[ace-users] Re: a little bug of ACE-5.4.1+TAO-1.4.1+CIAO-0.4.1.tar.gz
Hi Adam, Please upgrade to ACE+TAO x.4.8, which you can download from http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html under the heading "latest beta kit". The DOC groups at Washington University, UC Irvine, and Vanderbilt University only provide "best effort" support for non-sponsors for the latest beta kit, as described in http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/docs/ACE-bug-process.html Thus, if you need more "predictable" help for ACE 5.4.1, I recommend that you check out http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/commercial-support.html for a list of companies that will provide you with ACE+TAO commercial support. Thanks, Doug >> When I compile this version, it prompts me the following errors that >> /*------ >> gmake[6]: *** No rule to make target `Client_Request_Interceptor.cpp', >> needed by `.obj/Client_Request_Interceptor.o'. Stop. >> ------*/ >> >> Then I find there is something wrong about the directory: >> /export/home/adam/ace.5.4.1.cc.64/TAO/tests/Portable_Interceptors/Request_Interceptor_Flow >> There are two files whose file names suffix are very strange. >> 1. Client_Request_Interceptor.cp >> 2. Server_Request_Interceptor.cp >> After I rename them from .cp to .cpp >> >> I wonder if this is a bug or some thing I configure wrong? >> >> Regards, >> Adam >> -...

Re: [ciao-users] Errors running Hello example in CIAO 0.5.7 #2
Hi William, <br> <br>Sorry to bother you again. <br> <br>I followed your instructions and executed the following steps: <br> <br>1) Setted debug to 1 and optime to 0 in platform_macros.GNU and the file content is now: <br>no_hidden_visibility=1 <br>debug=1 <br>optimize=0 <br>include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_linux.GNU <br> <br>2) Rebuilt CIAO <br>3) Installed gdb version 6.6 <br>4) Set CIAO_DEBUG to 11 and executed ulimit -c unlimited in the consoles I used to execute run_NodeDaemons, ExecutionManager and PlanLauncher. <br> <br>Below is the result of these executions: <br> <br>1) <br> <br>$/usr/local/ACE_wrappers/TAO/CIAO/examples/Hello/descriptors$ perl run_NodeDaemons.pl <br>CIAO_NodeManager IOR: IOR:010000001f00000049444c3a4349414f2f4e6f64654d616e616765724461656d6f6e3a312e300000010000000000000068000000010102000a0000006c6f63616c686f73740061ea1b00000014010f00525354da5c35462f4a0c000000000001000000010000000002000000000000000800000001000000004f41540100000018000000010000000100010001000000010001050901010000000000 <br>CIAO_NodeManager is running... <br>CIAO_NodeManager IOR: IOR:010000001f00000049444c3a4349414f2f4e6f64654d616e616765724461656d6f6e3a312e300000010000000000000068000000010102000a0000006c6f63616c686f73740062ea1b00000014010f00525354da5c3546c12d0e000000000001000000010000000002000000000000000800000001...

Re: [ciao-users] Problems with CIAO 0.4.3 Quickbuild, using CIAOTAO.mwc
Hi > Subject: CIAO Build : Problems with Quickbuild, using $CIAO_ROOT/CIAOTAO.mwc > > ACE VERSION: 5.4.3 > TAO VERSION: 1.4.3 > CIAO VERSION: 0.4.3 Thanks for using the PRF! > > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > Windows 2000 Professional > > COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): > MS Visual Studio Version 6.0 SP 5 > > CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h : > #include "config-win32.h" > > CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/bin/MakeProjectCreator/config/default.features > ssl=0 > qos=1 > cidl=0 > rwho=0 > sctp=0 > > DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT: > COMPILATION and LINKING > > SYNOPSIS: > Trying to build CIAO using MPC generated nmake Files fails. > > DESCRIPTION: > I am going to evaluate CIAO in my thesis. So I tried to build > the DOC tree on my Win2000 with VC6.0 . > I took the following steps to achieve this: > 1. Clone the Source tree with clone_build_tree.pl win32 > 2. Set the ACE_ROOT Environment Variable to the cloned tree. > 3. Added config.h ( see above ) > 4. Downloaded most recent cidl compiler ( 0.4.3 ) > 5. Created nmake files, by executing > perl ..\..\bin\mwc.pl -type nmake CIAOTAO.mwc > ( perl version: v5.6.1 built for MSWin32-x86-multi-thread > with ActiveState patch ) AFAIK, we hav...

[ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3)
Hi Tom, > Well, the definition of "production release" for ACE is a bit murky > imho. Please see http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/docs/ACE-development-process.html for the canonical definition of terms. If there's something unclear there please let me know and I'll fixit. > The developers on this list (almost) always recommend using the > latest package, which is typically labeled a "beta release". Right, the reason we do that is because the "latest release" (which is most commonly a beta release) is the only thing the DOC group developers "support". > The latest would be 5.4.4. The developers always recommend *not* > using the "production release", since the next release labeled > "beta" is always a bug-fix-only release. So I usually use the x.x.1 > release (the BFO release) but would probably recommend using 5.4.4 > on any platform, as do the developers. I think you probably know this already, but for the benefit of others on the mailing list the DOC grou doesn't actually support *anything* officially for non-sponsors, i.e., our work is all on a "best effort or no effort at all" basis, as per the explanation in http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/docs/ACE-bug-process.html However, some companies like Riverace, OCI, PrismTech, etc. use our "official" (i.e., non-beta) releases as the basis f...

Re: [ciao-users] Problems with CIAO 0.4.3 Quickbuild, using CIAOTAO.mwc #2
Hi > Hi, > > you were right. Somehow in my Visual Studio there was set a path > to my nmake build and so the wrong tao_idl.exe and other dll's > were used. This lead to a little bit of trouble. > > I thank you for your advice. Cool! Glad to know that things worked. I am just CC'ing this to the users group so that users are aware (at a later date when they do a group search) of the results of the discussion. Thanks bala ...

Re: [ciao-users] Core dump file content
Hi Matt, <br> <br>It follows the output I'm having with gdb: <br> <br>GNU gdb 6.4.90-debian <br>Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. <br>GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are <br>welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. <br>Type "show copying" to see the conditions. <br>There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. <br>This GDB was configured as "i486-linux-gnu". <br>"/usr/local/ACE_wrappers/TAO/CIAO/DAnCE/ExecutionManager/core" is not a core dump: File format not recognized <br>(gdb) <br> <br>I tried several command lines such as "gdb Execution_Manager core", "gdb -c core" and I always get the same message. <br> <br>The reason I was CCing the message to the TAO list too is because some of my messages to CIAO list seems to get lost in the way, but I'll try not to do it again. <br> <br>Thank you. <br> <br>Santos <br> <br>---------[ Received Mail Content ]---------- <br> <br> Subject : Re: [ciao-users] Core dump file content - Error running Hello example in CIAO 0.5.7 <br> <br> Date : Tue, 01 May 2007 15:07:07 -0400 <br> <br> From : Matthew Gillen <mgillen@bbn.com> <br> <br> To : C...

[ace-users] Errors while compiling c++ 3.4.2
I get the following while compiling: /usr/bin/c++ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199506L -DNDEBUG -DUSING_GCC -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -DLINUX -I../inc -I../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers -fPIC -pedantic -fno-for-scope -Wno-long-long -Wno-deprecated -o Trace.o.linux -c Trace.cpp In file included from .../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers/ace/Unbounded_Set.h:306, from ../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers/ace/Memory_Pool.h:30, from ../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers/ace/Malloc.h:414, from ../3rd_party/ACE-5.3.0/ACE_wrappers/ace/String_Base....

Re: [ciao-users] Core dump file content
Hi William, <br> <br>I'll try to figure what it's happening with my machine configuration. <br> <br>When I said that my messages got lost in the way I didn't mean to say that my messages were taking to much time to be answered. What I really mean is that some of my messages did not reach the CIAO mailing list in the past. I'm aware that you do your best to support us. <br> <br>Thank you again. <br> <br>Santos <br>---------[ Received Mail Content ]---------- <br> <br> Subject : Re: [ciao-users] Core dump file content - Error running Hello example in CIAO 0. <br> <br> Date : Tue, 01 May 2007 14:49:58 -0500 <br> <br> From : "William R. Otte" <wotte@dre.vanderbilt.edu> <br> <br> To : "CIAO Users Mailing List" <ciao-users@cse.wustl.edu> <br> <br> <br> <br>Hi Santos - <br> <br> <br> <br>On Tue, 01 May 2007 14:19:19 -0500, san tos wrote: <br> <br> <br> <br>> Hi Matt, <br> <br>> <br> <br>> It follows the output I'm having with gdb: <br> <br>> <br> <br>> GNU gdb 6.4.90-debian <br> <br>> Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. <br> <br>> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you <br>...

RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4 compilation error on HP-UX 11.11/GNU g++ 3.4.3
The needed fix is, indeed, in ACE 5.5. If, for some reason, you need to stay on 5.4, the 5.4e Fix Kit from Riverace has this problem fixed as well. The fix is needed for g++ 3.4 on any platform. -Steve -- Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation Helping you succeed with ACE See http://www.riverace.com/support.htm > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu > [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas C. Schmidt > Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 7:01 PM > To: ecoboja@yahoo.com; ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4 compilation error on HP-UX > 11.11/GNU g++ 3.4.3 > > > Hi, > > Thanks for using the PRF. > > >> ACE VERSION: 5.4 > > Please upgrade to ACE 5.5, which you can download from > > http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html > > The DOC groups at Washington University, UC Irvine, and Vanderbilt > University only provide "best effort" support for non-sponsors for the > latest release, as described in > > http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/docs/ACE-bug-pro > cess.html > > Thus, if you need more "predictable" help for ACE 5.4, I recommend > that you check out > >...

[ciao-users] ACE+TAO+CIAO
Hi, We are pleased to announce a new beta of ACE-5.4.6, TAO-1.4.6 and CIAO-0.4.6. Since the x.4.5 beta had so many changes and improvements, we wanted to get this new beta out quickly to fix several important bugs reported by our users, which we greatly appreciate, as always. As usual the latest release is available at: http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html The doxygen documentation for the beta will be updated in the next few hours. We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your applications, and let us know if you encounter any problems. As always, please use the: $ACE_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $TAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $CIAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM so that we have the version/platform/compiler/options you're using to report problems. We also request that you take a look at $TAO_ROOT/docs/releasenotes $CIAO_ROOT/docs/releasenotes for the status of various ongoing projects at the DOC groups of WashU, UCI, and Vanderbilt to move ACE+TAO+CIAO forward. Overviews of our recent progress and upcoming plans are available at $ACE_ROOT/NEWS $TAO_ROOT/NEWS $CIAO_ROOT/NEWS The overall success rates for the test results gathered from all our daily builds is 98% for the ACE tests and 94% for the TAO tests. Please see http://www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/scoreboard/ for a summary of these tests. Our goal is to get these tests close to 100% for the next major release (i.e., ACE 6.0, TAO 2.0, and C...

Web resources about - Re: [ciao-users] Hello error with CIAO 0.4.3 - comp.soft-sys.ace

Resources last updated: 3/5/2016 7:10:21 PM