f



Re: [tao-users] Is it possible to use two different versions of the ACE/TAO in the same application?

Hi,

>> I'm developing an application (Intel Pentium 4 - Linux Red Hat 2.4.21-4.EL -
>> g++ 3.2.3) that uses two different "third party" libraries.
>> The first one was compiled and linked with ACE-TAO 5.4/1.4. The second one with
>> ACE-TAO 5.4.8/1.4.8. The second library was compiled enabling
>> ACE_HAS_VERSIONED_NAMESPACE and TAO_HAS_VERSIONED_NAMESPACE to avoid
>> symbolic ambiguity.
>> 
>> The following ld warnings appear when I compile my application:
>> 
>> "/usr/bin/ld: warning: libTAO_IORTable.so.1.4.8, needed by ... may conflict
>> with libTAO_IORTable.so.1.4.0
>> /usr/bin/ld: warning: libTAO_CosNaming.so.1.4.8, needed by ... may conflict
>> with libTAO_CosNaming.so.1.4.0
>> /usr/bin/ld: warning: libTAO_Messaging.so.1.4.8, needed by ... may conflict
>> with libTAO_Messaging.so.1.4.0
>> /usr/bin/ld: warning: libTAO_Valuetype.so.1.4.8, needed by ... may conflict
>> with libTAO_Valuetype.so.1.4.0
>> /usr/bin/ld: warning: libTAO_CosNotification.so.1.4.8, needed by ... may
>> conflict with libTAO_CosNotification.so.1.4.0
>> /usr/bin/ld: warning: libTAO_PortableServer.so.1.4.8, needed by ... may
>> conflict with libTAO_PortableServer.so.1.4.0
>> /usr/bin/ld: warning: libTAO.so.1.4.8, needed by ... may conflict with
>> libTAO.so.1.4.0
>> /usr/bin/ld: warning: libACE.so.5.4.8, needed by ... may conflict with l
>> ibACE.so.5.4.0"
>> 
>> Moreover, my application fails in segmentation fault during the first ORB_init
>> invocation.
>> 
>> My question to the TAO users list is:
>> Is it possible to use two different versions of the ACE/TAO in the same
>> application?

Yes.

>> In case of affermative answer, how is it possible?

Ossama, can you help out here?  In particular, do we have autobuilds
setup to illustrate how to do this?

Thanks,

        Doug


















-- 
Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt                       Professor and Associate Chair
Electrical Engineering and Computer Science  TEL: (615) 343-8197
Institute for Software Integrated Systems    WEB: www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/~schmidt
Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN, 37203   NET: d.schmidt@vanderbilt.edu

0
Douglas
1/30/2006 3:35:00 PM
comp.soft-sys.ace 20326 articles. 1 followers. marlow.andrew (167) is leader. Post Follow

0 Replies
537 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 5

Reply:

Similar Artilces:

[tao-users] Is it possible to use two different versions of the ACE/TAO in the same application?
Dear Tao users, I'm developing an application (Intel Pentium 4 - Linux Red Hat 2.4.21-4.EL - g++ 3.2.3) that uses two different "third party" libraries. The first one was compiled and linked with ACE-TAO 5.4/1.4. The second one with ACE-TAO 5.4.8/1.4.8. The second library was compiled enabling ACE_HAS_VERSIONED_NAMESPACE and TAO_HAS_VERSIONED_NAMESPACE to avoid symbolic ambiguity. The following ld warnings appear when I compile my application: "/usr/bin/ld: warning: libTAO_IORTable.so.1.4.8, needed by ... may conflict with libTAO_IORTable.so.1.4.0 /usr/bin/ld: warning: libTAO_CosNaming.so.1.4.8, needed by ... may conflict with libTAO_CosNaming.so.1.4.0 /usr/bin/ld: warning: libTAO_Messaging.so.1.4.8, needed by ... may conflict with libTAO_Messaging.so.1.4.0 /usr/bin/ld: warning: libTAO_Valuetype.so.1.4.8, needed by ... may conflict with libTAO_Valuetype.so.1.4.0 /usr/bin/ld: warning: libTAO_CosNotification.so.1.4.8, needed by ... may conflict with libTAO_CosNotification.so.1.4.0 /usr/bin/ld: warning: libTAO_PortableServer.so.1.4.8, needed by ... may conflict with libTAO_PortableServer.so.1.4.0 /usr/bin/ld: warning: libTAO.so.1.4.8, needed by ... may conflict with libTAO.so.1.4.0 /usr/bin/ld: warning: libACE.so.5.4.8, needed by ... may conflict with l ibACE.so.5.4.0" Moreover, my application fails in segmentation fault during the first ORB_init invocation. My question to the TAO users list is: Is it possible to use t...

[tao-users] Re: [ace-users] How to use c++ native exception handling instead of ACE's while building ACE+TAO
Hi, >> My only guess is that all of the libs you are linking in your >> builds were not compiled with a consistent set of options. Right, my recommendation would be to completely blow away your existing ACE+TAO x.5 directory, download a fresh version, and start from a clean slate. It sounds like you may have things lying around from previous build attempts. Thanks, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt Professor and Associate Chair Electrical Engineering and Computer Science TEL: (615) 343-8197 Institute for Software Integrated Systems WEB: www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/~schmidt Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN, 37203 NET: d.schmidt@vanderbilt.edu ...

[tao-users] RE: [ace-users] ACE/TAO on Solaris 10
Hi, There have been some replies. People do have things working on Solaris and there have been made fixes in ACE/TAO. Could you wait another week or so and try the x.4.8 or try cvs, see http://cvs.doc.wustl.edu Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl > Dear list members, > > (I sent this message couple of days ago and am unsure if it > was distributed, > thus re-sending it again. I apologize if you received it more > than once) > > I would like to give feedback regarding availability of > ACE/TAO (versions > 5.4.7 and 1.4.7 respectively) on OpenSolaris (Solaris 10) > Intel platform. > > Sun is selectively releasing source code of the Solaris 10 under an > open-source license. Details of this project and installable Solaris > binaries can be found on here: > http://www.opensolaris.org > > Sun has also released Forte compiler set in binary form to > the OpenSolaris > community. A Quote from their website: "Sun Studio 10 > software is freely > available to participants in the OpenSolaris community for > development on > both OpenSolaris and Solaris[tm] Operating Systems on > SPARC-based systems > and x86-based systems, as well as on Linux." You can get > access to Forte > compilers from the OpenSolaris website as well but you should register...

RE: [tao-users] Re: [ace-users] Re: Announcing the release of the new beta (ACE-5.4.10, TAO-1.4.10 and CIAO-0.4.10)
Hi, > > >> We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your > > >> applications, and let us know soon if you encounter any problems > > >> since we plan to cut the x.5 release by February 28th. > > > > As per Wallace's comments, we have an aggressive schedule > for the x.5 > > release to meet the needs of some major sponsors. If > people can give > > x.4.10 a "test drive" in the next couple of days and report problems > > they encounter we'll try to ensure that we fix any > showstoppers before > > According to bugzilla bug 2323 is not fixed yet. > > http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2323 > > For us it is a show stopper. We use the OCI version which does not > have problems related to this bug but it would be nice to be able to > use the latest version with more fixes. FYI, the reason that this test now fails is because Ossama added several new test cases which wheren't in the test in the past, this uncovered some bugs which according to our information where already there a long time. Johnny "Johnny Willemsen" <jwillemsen@remedy.nl> writes: > > > >> We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your > > > >> applications, and let us know soon if you encounter any problems > > > >> sinc...

[tao-users] RE: [ace-users] Re: How to use Any>>=OctetSeq in TAO 1.3.6?
Hi, I just had a quick look. It looks to me the that TAO_Export macro is missing from OctetSeqA.h for the operators. Also the include of pre/post files is missing. Heiko, could you try to add TAO_Export to front of the operators in OctetSeqA.h and then rebuild TAO and you app. I think the linker errors should be gone. Bala, shouldn't we add pre/post includes and TAO_Export to the archive files? Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Leeghwaterstraat 25 2811 DT Reeuwijk The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl....

[tao-users] RE: [ace-users] Re: How to use Any>>=OctetSeq in TAO 1.3.6? #2
Hi, > > Heiko, could you try to add TAO_Export to front of the operators in > > OctetSeqA.h and then rebuild TAO and you app. I think the linker > > errors should be gone. > > this is the solution! Thank you :-) Thanks for the feedback. I have just committed the fix into the repo and this will be in the 1.4 release. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Leeghwaterstraat 25 2811 DT Reeuwijk The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl ...

Re: [ace-users] [tao-users] ACE/TAO ported to Sun Studio 12
Hi, > is this change included in the official release of ACT/TAO (and if yes > since which version)? This change will be part of the upcoming x.6.2 version. I am creating x.6.2 at this moment, when everything runs fine it will be available at the end of today. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl *** Integrated compile and test statistics see http://scoreboard.theaceorb.nl *** *** Commercial service and support for ACE/TAO/CIAO *** *** See http://www.theaceorb.nl/en/support.html *** ...

[ace-users] RE: [tao-users] Borland Developer Studio 2006 with ACE/TAO
Hi, I'm curious about the current status of ACE/TAO and C++ Builder 2006. Borland shipped the promised fix/update some time ago, but I couldn't find anything about how it works with ACE/TAO. Regards Espen Harlinn ...

[tao-users] Re: [ace-users] timestamps incorrect in ACE+TAO .tar.gz
Hi > It has just come to my attention that there are many files in the > ACE+TAO .tar.gz file with timestamps showing '1970-01-05'. Obviously > this is wrong and is the only reason why my packages have been > rejected from Debian ("file(s) with a time stamp too ancient"). > > Is there a possibility that this will be fixed. Or should I just > 'touch' all the problematic files? Could you please run a touch on them? I don't know how this happened. Strange. Opening and fiddling with the distribution would make quite a few things goofy! If ...

[tao-users] RE: [ace-users] Tao_idl core dumps during ACE/TAO build
Hi, Please upgrade to ACE+TAO x.4.7, which you can download from http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/Download.html under the heading "latest beta kit". The DOC groups at Washington University, UC Irvine, and Vanderbilt University only provide "best effort" support for non-sponsors for the latest beta kit, as described in http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/docs/ACE-bug-process.html Thus, if you need more "predictable" help, I recommend that you check out http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/commercial-support.html for a list of companies that will provide you with ACE+TAO commercial support. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl > TAO VERSION: 1.4.1 > ACE VERSION: 5.4.1 > > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: > Dell PowerEdge750, Slackware Linux 10.1.0 > > TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: > COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): > gcc version 3.3.4 > > AREA/CLASS/EXAMPLE AFFECTED: > CosConcurrencyControl.idl failed due to tao_idl core dump > > DOES THE PROBLEM AFFECT: > COMPILATION? Yes > $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h and > $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU > included below > LINKING? No > EXECUTION? No > OTHER (please specify)? No > > SYNOPSIS: > TAO fails to build because tao_...

RE: [tao-users] RE: [ace-users] XML service configuration no longer works with ACE/TAO 5.4.5/1.4.5
Hi, > > Hi Lothar > > > > > � � ACE VERSION: 5.4.5 > > > > Thanks for using the PRF form. Could you try to find the > problem and send > > us patches to fix this? > > > > Regards, > > > > Johnny Willemsen > > I have no problem committing some time to the problem. I do > however know as > much as nothing about the ACE XML parser and it's recent > changes. It seems to > me that (some) of the recent changes might have caused the > test failures. So > if someone working actively on ACEXML gives me directions I > am willing to > spend my time investigating the problem. I can't remember that work has been done the last months so I am also amazed things broke. Nobody is actively working on it, so I think there are not much directions at this moment. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl On Wednesday 18 May 2005 11:01, Johnny Willemsen wrote: > Hi, > I can't remember that work has been done the last months so I am also > amazed things broke. Nobody is actively working on it, so I think there are > not much directions at this moment. Well, it did definiteley work with 5.4.4. So any changes that broke it must have been made between 5.4.4 and 5.4.5. I also read in the release email of 5.4.5 in the CIAO...

[ace-bugs] Re: [ace-users] How to use c++ native exception handling instead of ACE's while building ACE+TAO
Hi, To ensure that we have proper version/platform/compiler information, please make sure you fill out the appropriate problem report form (PRF), which is in $ACE_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $TAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM or in $ACE_ROOT/BUG-REPORT-FORM $TAO_ROOT/BUG-REPORT-FORM in older versions of ACE+TAO. Make sure to include this information when asking any questions about ACE+TAO since otherwise we have to "guess" what version/platform/compiler/options you've using, which is error-prone and slows down our responsiveness. > I know we can set exceptions = 1 or 0 in platform_macros.GNU > to use ACE's exception handling or C++'s native exception handling. > > But I am still not clear on which value should I set exceptions to if > I want to use only the C++'s native exception handling support. Then just set it to 1 which is the default. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl ------=_Part_4854_4331443.1142846841468 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline ACE VERSION: 5.5 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: *Sparc, Solaris 10 * If on Windows based OS's, which version of WINSOCK do you use?: TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AN...

Re: [tao-users] ACE and TAO versioning
Hi Jules, >> Why don't you make the version of ACE and TAO the same? They are >> almost always distributed in the same tar-ball and are very much >> synchronized with each other. The reason is largely "truth in advertising" and version numbering consistency. ACE began in 1991 and TAO in 1997, so ACE's version numbers have had longer to increase. Perhaps we should starting calling things ACE 2006, TAO 2006, etc. a la Windows! >> I have always thought that it was confusing to refer to ACE 5.x.y >> and TAO 1.x.y. The 5 and 1 makes it looks like ACE is light years >> ahead in features and testing in comparison to TAO... Well, in the grand scheme of things, ACE is much more mature than TAO, i.e., we primarily do bug fixes and subsetting on ACE now, rather than adding many new features. In contrast, we still add new features to TAO as the CORBA spec evolves. BTW, at some point this year we hope to release ACE 6.0, TAO 2.0, and CIAO 1.0, so hopefully that'll help a bit ;-) Thanks, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt Professor and Associate Chair Electrical Engineering and Computer Science TEL: (615) 343-8197 Institute for Software Integrated Systems WEB: www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/~schmidt Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN, 37203 NET: d.schmidt@vanderbilt.edu ...

[ace-users] RE: [tao-users] Borland Developer Studio 2006 with ACE/TAO #2
Hi, The x.4.8 version of ACE/TAO is supported with BCB2006, we have some linker warnings/errors in some configurations, Borland is working on these for Update2, but these are not causing a problem. See ACE_wrappers/ACE-INSTALL.html for info about how to use it. We deliver also commercial support for using BCB2006 with ACE/TAO. See www.theaceorb.nl for our services. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl > -----Original Message----- > From: Espen Harlinn [mailto:espen@harlinn.no] > Sent: donderdag 2 februari 2006 18:06 > To: jwillemsen@remedy.nl > Cc: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: RE: [tao-users] Borland Developer Studio 2006 with ACE/TAO > > Hi, > > I'm curious about the current status of ACE/TAO and C++ Builder 2006. > Borland shipped the promised fix/update some time ago, but I > couldn't find > anything about how it works with ACE/TAO. > > Regards > Espen Harlinn > > ...

[ace-users] RE: [tao-users] Borland Developer Studio 2006 with ACE/TAO #2
Hi, See http://www.remedy.nl/en/borland.html for an overview of the supported Borland products with TAO. Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Postbus 101 2650 AC Berkel en Rodenrijs The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl > -----Original Message----- > From: Espen Harlinn [mailto:espen@harlinn.no] > Sent: donderdag 2 februari 2006 18:06 > To: jwillemsen@remedy.nl > Cc: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: RE: [tao-users] Borland Developer Studio 2006 with ACE/TAO > > Hi, > > I'm curious about the current status of ACE/TAO and C++ Builder 2006. > Borland shipped the promised fix/update some time ago, but I > couldn't find > anything about how it works with ACE/TAO. > > Regards > Espen Harlinn > > ...

Re: [tao-users] Re: [ace-users] Example showing how to use TAO to return a reference to a C++ class object via an ORB service
Hi Alex, >> Corba can marschall only those types that are known to it. (either build >> in basic types or defined by IDL). There is standard way to >> serialize a >> C++ class. I think you mean "there is no standard way to serialize a C++ class" right?! Take care, Doug ...

Re: [ace-users] Re: [tao-users] Re: difficulties compling TAO with mingw and msys
Hi, Great, when we get time we will try to upgrade to a newer version of MinGW, but it is still a candidate. Just keep an eye on the scoreboard, when we upgrade you will see it there. As you can see on the scoreboard, there are no issues with the 3.2.3 version Regards, Johnny Willemsen Remedy IT Leeghwaterstraat 25 2811 DT Reeuwijk The Netherlands www.theaceorb.nl / www.remedy.nl "William Lederer" <wgl@localhost.localdomain> wrote in message news:<m3pt4yrtfx.fsf@localhost.localdomain>... > Thanks! > > I followed your advice in your earli...

RE: [ace-users] Re: what version tao/ace for AIX 5.2 posix aio
Hi Duane, I can't speak for TAO's use of AIO, but ACE 5.4 does support AIO on AIX 5.2. -Steve -- Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation Co-author of "C++ Network Programming" and "The ACE Programmer's Guide" Books, ACE kit and support info at http://www.riverace.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu > [mailto:owner-ace-users@cse.wustl.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas C. Schmidt > Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2004 2:49 PM > To: shuston@riverace.com; ace-users@cs.wustl.edu > Subject: [ace-user...

RE: [ace-users] How to use c++ native exception handling instead of ACE's while building ACE+TAO
Hi, The files hand-crafted from pseudo IDL in the ORB are all using -Ge 1, the same as the orbsvcs files in your use case, so there should be no conflict. When you say you've set exceptions=1, does that mean for orbsvcs or for the TAO build as well? We are in the process of dropping support for ACE's exception handling, and as I understand it, in the version of ACE+TAO that you have, ACE exception handling should not be possible. My own workspace always uses native exception handling (and the IDL compiler option -Ge 1), and I have no build problems at any time. My only guess is that all of the libs you are linking in your builds were not compiled with a consistent set of options. If you could do a sanity check on this, we can eliminate it as a cause of the problem and look into it more deeply. thanks, Jeff > -----Original Message----- > From: Douglas C. Schmidt [mailto:schmidt@cse.wustl.edu] > Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 7:08 AM > To: ace-users@cs.wustl.edu; mycorba@gmail.com; > parsons@dre.vanderbilt.edu > Subject: Re: [ace-users] How to use c++ native exception > handling instead of ACE's while building ACE+TAO > > Hi, > > Thanks for using the PRF. > > >> ACE VERSION: 5.5 > > >> Why the -Ge flag is 1 in all the GNUmakefile.* (e.g. > >> GNUmakefile.CosNaming) in the directory: > >> $TAO_ROOT/orbsvcs/orbsvcs. In fact= , I h...

Re: [ace-users] Re: [tao-users] Re: difficulties compling TAO with mingw and msys #2
Hi, > > Great, when we get time we will try to upgrade to a newer version of MinGW, > > but it is still a candidate. Just keep an eye on the scoreboard, when we > > upgrade you will see it there. As you can see on the scoreboard, there are > > no issues with the 3.2.3 version > > I have run all but a few of the provided tests, and all looks well. We run all ACE tests, no issues there, we are working on the TAO tests, some of the tests are able to freeze our build system > Out of curiosity, what is required for eliminating the > inline/dlli...

RE: [ace-users] How to use c++ native exception handling instead of ACE's while building ACE+TAO #2
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C64CE3.591E106C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, =20 >From the errors below, it looks like: =20 - You have either overridden the base class method _is_a() when it needs no overriding, or you have declared another method with the same name in your implementation class. =20 - You have used throw specs in methods and then have their implementations throw exceptions not in the list. =20 - You have used methods in ACE_Array_Map that don't exist. =20 =20 None of these things is related to exception handling, at least, to the question of whether exception handling is native or emulated. =20 Jeff _____ =20 From: Ji Soo [mailto:mycorba@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 1:51 AM To: Jeff Parsons Cc: Douglas C. Schmidt; ace-users@cs.wustl.edu Subject: Re: [ace-users] How to use c++ native exception handling instead of ACE's while building ACE+TAO =09 =09 Hi,=20 =20 Now I have download a fresh TAO's source package and built it. I compiled an idl file with tao_idl. =20 The command line is : tao_idl -Sc -Sp -Ge 2 -hc _c.hh -hs _s.hh -cs _c.cc -ss _s.cc -ci _c.i -si _s.i -Wb,pre_include=3Dace/pre.h -Wb,post_include=3Dace/post.h -I. MyTest.idl. =20 And then I compile the generated stub and skelton codes with my implementation codes. The command line is: ...

Re: [ace-users] How to use c++ native exception handling instead of ACE's while building ACE+TAO #2
Hi, > However, all the codes are stub and skelton files generated from IDL > files. So I am puzzled. It sounds to me like you have do something like the following: .. Build TAO's ORB services using -Ge 2 option at some point, which would leave lots of stubs/skeletons around with the emulated exceptions. .. Then later gone back and rebuilt ACE+TAO using native exceptions and -Ge 1, but not cleaned up the stubs/skeletons generated earlier. That's why I recommend you TOTALLY start over from scratch and see if things work better. If this all seems like too much effort, please go ahead and purchase a precompiled version of ACE+TAO at nominal cost from OCI <http://www.theaceorb.com>. Thanks, Doug ------=_Part_9834_13545624.1143000995070 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, Thanks! Now I am just studying TAO. I have studied the codes. For example, for the warning: "MyNotifDefs_s.hh", line 160: Warning: POA_MyDefinitions::MyNotifDefs::MyCa= l lback::_is_a Hides the virtual function TAO_ServantBase::_is_a(const char*, CORBA::Environment&) in a virtual base. I read the codes in tao/PortableServer/Servant_Base.h and tao/Abstract_Servant_Base.h, especially the virtual function _is_a (...). I comment the line "CORBA::Environment&" in such virtual functions and then the warnin...

RE: [ace-users] How to use c++ native exception handling instead of ACE's while building ACE+TAO #2
Hi, > >> In fact, I built ACE + TAO with all the default configuration. > >> Just created one file config.h in ACE_wrappers/ace, which > includes one line= > >> : > >> #include "ace/config-sunos5.10.h", and another file > >> ACE_wrappers/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU, > which includes only > >> one line: > $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU. > >> > >> Then I cd into ACE_wrappers/ace and run "gmake", and then cd into > >> ACE_wrappers/apps/gperf and ACE_wrappers/TAO and run "gmake". > >> There seems no problems during the building except > warnings about some > >> modules missed such as "x11" and "SSL". > >> > >> Yes, there is no CORBA::Environment & in the methods of > those generated stu= > >> b > >> and skelton files from my test IDL files. > >> > >> I mean there are macros such as ACE_ENV_ARG_DECL_WITH_DEFAULTS > >> in the methods of those *.h and *.cpp files in the > downloaded TAO's source > >> package (e.g. the _is_a(...) functions in > >> ACE_wrappers/TAO/tao/PortableServer/Servant_Base.h and > >> ACE_wrappers/TAO/tao/PortableServer/Servant_Base.cpp). So > I think it's not > >> related to building ACE +TAO. The macros...

Re: [ace-users] How to use c++ native exception handling instead of ACE's while building ACE+TAO #2
Hi Ji, >> The problem seems to me that the application code is compiled with >> an own set of GNU makefiles, they don't use the rules from the ones >> we ship with ACE. Is this correct? If so, then it's no surprise you're having problems.. >> I would propose that the reporter uses MPC to generate the >> makefiles and build those, all really looks like mismatches in >> compiler settings. Right, that's my intuition, as well. Take care, Doug -- Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt Professor and Associate Chair Electrical Engineering and Computer Science TEL: (615) 343-8197 Institute for Software Integrated Systems WEB: www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/~schmidt Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN, 37203 NET: d.schmidt@vanderbilt.edu "Douglas C. Schmidt" <schmidt@cse.wustl.edu> writes: >>> The problem seems to me that the application code is compiled with >>> an own set of GNU makefiles, they don't use the rules from the ones >>> we ship with ACE. > > Is this correct? If so, then it's no surprise you're having problems.. > >>> I would propose that the reporter uses MPC to generate the >>> makefiles and build those, all really looks like mismatches in >>> compiler settings. > > Right, that's my intuition, as well. One advantage of the autoconf build is that almost all of...

Web resources about - Re: [tao-users] Is it possible to use two different versions of the ACE/TAO in the same application? - comp.soft-sys.ace

Application - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License ;additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the ...

NZ doctor Alan Kenny flooded with 'trash' applications for $370k job
The New Zealand GP who couldn't find a doctor to take up a $NZ400,000 ($370,000) position at his practice has been inundated with "trash" applicants ...

NZ doctor Alan Kenny flooded with 'trash' applications for $370k job
The New Zealand GP who couldn't find a doctor to take up a $NZ400,000 ($370,000) position at his practice has been inundated with &quot;trash&quot; ...

Western Digital Introduces Its First Helium-Filled HDDs for Consumer Applications
... two models with 10 TB capacity. This week Western Digital unveiled the world’s first family of helium-filled HDDs designed for consumer applications, ...

NASA just smashed its record for astronaut applications—18,000+
... excitement about the future of NASA, with the space shuttle soon to debut, was palpable. So when the space agency called for astronaut applications, ...

Introducing Analytics for Google Cast Applications
... Engineer on the Google Cast Server Infrastructure Team As a Google Cast developer, you may be wondering how many devices access your application, ...

Oklahoma: Concealed Carry Permit Applications Surge Following Obama’s Gun Control
... State Bureau of Investigation numbers suggest gun control talk and Pres. Obama's gun controls contributed to surging concealed carry applications. ...

MBA: Mortgage Applications Decreased in Latest Weekly Survey, Purchase Applications up 27% YoY
From the MBA: Mortgage Applications Decrease in Latest MBA Weekly Survey Mortgage applications decreased 4.8 percent from one week earlier, ...

Review: 5 application security testing tools compared
Users weigh in on favorite features, room for improvement. Application security is arguably the biggest cyber threat , responsible for 90 percent ...

Mortgage applications fall 4.8%
Low mortgage rates are no longer a novelty, hence no longer a sudden incentive for mortgage borrowers.

Resources last updated: 3/5/2016 10:09:19 AM