hello
i have some trouble computing dtft of signal x using an approximation trapz function
any ideas?
thx
yossi
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
yossikfir (18)
|
1/10/2012 12:20:08 PM |
|
"yossi kfir" <yossikfir@walla.com> wrote in message
news:jehado$so4$1@newscl01ah.mathworks.com...
> hello
> i have some trouble computing dtft of signal x using an approximation
> trapz function
>
> any ideas?
Define "trouble." The more relevant information/code you post to the group
in your reply the more likely it is someone will be able to help you.
[Please don't send the information to me directly; by posting to the group,
many more people will be able to read and potentially help you.]
--
Steve Lord
slord@mathworks.com
To contact Technical Support use the Contact Us link on
http://www.mathworks.com
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
slord (13361)
|
1/10/2012 2:49:19 PM
|
|
On Jan 11, 3:33=A0am, "yossi kfir" <yossik...@walla.com> wrote:
> ?
Is the dtft like the cbdf or is it more like the ytiu?
Perhaps you'd like to spell it out?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
mulgor (2863)
|
1/10/2012 7:02:37 PM
|
|
On 10 Jan, 13:20, "yossi kfir" <yossik...@walla.com> wrote:
> hello
> i have some trouble computing dtft of signal x using an approximation =A0=
trapz function
The problem is that you do things the wrong way.
The DTFT doesn't require an integral to be
computed at all, it's an infinite sum over
discrete elements that is computed for
a continuous w (view with fixed-widt font):
inf
H(w) =3D sum x[n] exp(jw).
n =3D -inf
(possibly -jw in the exponent, but that
doesn't change the anser to your question).
So there are no integrals to be computed
at all. Only infinitely many infinite sums.
Rune
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
allnor (8474)
|
1/10/2012 7:52:13 PM
|
|