Commodore 65 is very interesting... Questions....
3 inch drive built in C65, it has 1581 rom?
In C64 mode, use the permanent drive #8 as 3 inch drive or disable 3 inch
drive, external 1541 drive enabled?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Jack
|
5/15/2009 2:07:45 AM |
|
"Jack Tseng" <tseng4@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:O74Pl.44665$5N7.33733@newsfe09.iad...
> Commodore 65 is very interesting... Questions....
>
> 3 inch drive built in C65, it has 1581 rom?
No. Although format compatibility was retained, it's a completely different
thing. They don't even share the same controller.
>
> In C64 mode, use the permanent drive #8 as 3 inch drive or disable 3 inch
> drive, external 1541 drive enabled?
It's been ages since I played with my units, but as far as I remember, you
can assign a different unit number to the 3,5" drive and use a 1541 as
device #8 just fine, at least on the latter firmware releases. The early
firmwares were sloppy, expecially in terms of disk transfer rate and C64
emulation...The built in 1565 was also friggin' slow in the early releases,
but got a whole lot better down the road.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/15/2009 5:40:14 AM
|
|
My question: Is the C65 worth buying? Why and how much? Where can I
find it and information on it?
On May 15, 1:40=A0am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> "Jack Tseng" <tse...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:O74Pl.44665$5N7.33733@newsfe09.iad...
>
> > Commodore 65 is very interesting... Questions....
>
> > 3 inch drive built in C65, it has 1581 rom?
>
> No. Although format compatibility was retained, it's a completely differe=
nt
> thing. They don't even share the same controller.
>
>
>
> > In C64 mode, use the permanent drive #8 as 3 inch drive or disable 3 in=
ch
> > drive, external 1541 drive enabled?
>
> It's been ages since I played with my units, but as far as I remember, yo=
u
> can assign a different unit number to the 3,5" drive and use a 1541 as
> device #8 just fine, at least on the latter firmware releases. The early
> firmwares were sloppy, expecially in terms of disk transfer rate and C64
> emulation...The built in 1565 was also friggin' slow in the early release=
s,
> but got a whole lot better down the road.
>
> Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Harry
|
5/15/2009 4:38:30 PM
|
|
The C65 was a prototype and never been released.
So it is very rare. A couple of months ago a C65 is sold on Ebay for
5000 USD....
Groetjes, Siem Appelman
http://www.siemappelman.nl
On 15 mei, 18:38, Harry Potter <maspethro...@aol.com> wrote:
> My question: Is the C65 worth buying? =A0Why and how much? =A0Where can I
> find it and information on it?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
siemappelman
|
5/16/2009 10:46:04 PM
|
|
<siemappelman@quicknet.nl> wrote in message
news:3b2350f7-cd2f-4f28-a4bd-90cdecceb2c2@s16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
> The C65 was a prototype and never been released.
> So it is very rare. A couple of months ago a C65 is sold on Ebay for
> 5000 USD....
>
>Groetjes, Siem Appelman
5000$ ??? Are you sure? When did that happen, I must have lost it. Since I
bought my first C65 ( around 5 - 6 years ago ) I have it on the saved eBay
searches...I saw a keyboard sold recently, but not a full unit...
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/17/2009 10:01:13 PM
|
|
I remember one auction (on EU eBay) of a C65, the price went until
9-10 USD. it was more than half a year ago..
> > So it is very rare. A couple of months ago a C65 is sold on Ebay for
> > 5000 USD....
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
xc8
|
5/18/2009 9:52:07 AM
|
|
9-10 USD or 90k-10k USD ?
If it's just 9 USD then that would be strange. I don't even buy a C64 with
that money :-)
The least I paid for a C65 piece was ...Uhm, 200$ for a Rev 2A motherboard.
From Maurice Randall. And, believe it or not, it was delivered _in time_, he
did it like a pro. This was probably around 7 - 6 years ago.
Riccardo
"xc8/bRONx" <csynt8bit@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1254f0a4-e5a9-4cf4-a46f-07d6a37eb7bf@g20g2000vba.googlegroups.com...
>I remember one auction (on EU eBay) of a C65, the price went until
> 9-10 USD. it was more than half a year ago..
>
>> > So it is very rare. A couple of months ago a C65 is sold on Ebay for
>> > 5000 USD....
>
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/18/2009 8:20:20 PM
|
|
sorry!!
It was a typo!!
the price was 9k-10k USD not 9-10 bucks...!!
On May 18, 9:20=A0pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> 9-10 USD or 90k-10k USD ?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
xc8
|
5/19/2009 8:40:20 AM
|
|
On May 19, 4:40=A0am, "xc8/bRONx" <csynt8...@gmail.com> wrote:
> sorry!!
> It was a typo!!
>
> the price was 9k-10k USD not 9-10 bucks...!!
>
> On May 18, 9:20=A0pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > 9-10 USD or 90k-10k USD ?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
What would a c65 that's missing the chipset go for now?
I bought 2 of them around 11 or 12 years ago. I don't remember what I
gave for them.
Later,
dabone
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
dabone
|
5/19/2009 8:35:22 PM
|
|
"dabone" <dabone@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3678498a-6380-4fc8-b692-2b2cd9a021f7@z5g2000vba.googlegroups.com...
> What would a c65 that's missing the chipset go for now?
> I bought 2 of them around 11 or 12 years ago. I don't remember what I
> gave for them.
I think the value depends on whether the computers are in working order or
not. A C65 with no chips is useless, I guess it's good just for the sake of
owning a collectible item, but still unfunctional.
I presonally bought four complete C65 units, from people who probably still
hang around here, and of course I remember what I gave for them. Definitely
not 9000$ nor 4000$, anyway, they were pricey nonetheless. Oddly, only one
of these computers I own has a serial number ( SN:000044 ).
That was a long time ago, though, and honestly I am surprised the price now
is this high, I couldn't afford buying one nowadays. A very nice guy, a true
gentleman from the States who is also an Amiga 4000 user, sold me his C65 he
paid 125$ for it., around 1992. The computer still works today and it's well
taken care of.
The C65 is a very nice computer and playing C64 games on the VIC-III's crisp
output is a blast.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/19/2009 9:41:57 PM
|
|
On May 19, 10:41=A0pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> I think the value depends on whether the computers are in working order o=
r
> not. A C65 with no chips is useless
I'm of the opinion that any hardware that has zero software is
useless, so beyond dollar and nostalgia value, the C65 is in the same
category. If you got lucky years ago or are a millionaire then it
might be fun for a few minutes.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/20/2009 9:12:30 AM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:9d88e315-47f2-4204-b60c-3c2ba7281c0c@n4g2000vba.googlegroups.com...
On May 19, 10:41 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> I think the value depends on whether the computers are in working order or
> not. A C65 with no chips is useless
> I'm of the opinion that any hardware that has zero software is useless, so
> beyond dollar and nostalgia value, the C65 is in the same category. If you
> got lucky years ago or are a millionaire then it might be fun for a few
> minutes.
It's your opinion, which I personally found completely laughable. Following
your logic, the ENIAC is probably a worthless piece of trash as well. Maybe
Babbage's Difference Engine is crap too, because it has no software. But
again, hey, it's your opinion.
My opinion is that, with C65 bashers, it's always a matter of sour grapes.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/20/2009 12:14:01 PM
|
|
Riccardo Rubini wrote:
> <daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
> news:9d88e315-47f2-4204-b60c-3c2ba7281c0c@n4g2000vba.googlegroups.com...
> On May 19, 10:41 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> I think the value depends on whether the computers are in working
>> order or not. A C65 with no chips is useless
>
>> I'm of the opinion that any hardware that has zero software is
>> useless, so beyond dollar and nostalgia value, the C65 is in the
>> same category. If you got lucky years ago or are a millionaire then
>> it might be fun for a few minutes.
>
> It's your opinion, which I personally found completely laughable.
> Following your logic, the ENIAC is probably a worthless piece of
> trash as well. Maybe Babbage's Difference Engine is crap too,
> because it has no software. But again, hey, it's your opinion.
Just think about some of the crap C= did release yet C= didn't bother
releasing the C65, that in itself speaks volumes about what they themselves
thought of it ;-)
> My opinion is that, with C65 bashers, it's always a matter of sour
> grapes.
I don't think so. It's not a question of bashing anyway, it's a question of
usefulness. Playing C64 games you can do on any C64, you don't need a C65
for that. The ENIAC and Difference Engine both served a specific purpose. So
what the makes the C65 in it's native mode so useful in your opinion?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Clocky
|
5/20/2009 2:28:59 PM
|
|
"Clocky" <nicetry@migo.com> wrote in message
news:002fee20$0$9716$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
> Just think about some of the crap C= did release yet C= didn't bother
> releasing the C65, that in itself speaks volumes about what they
> themselves thought of it ;-)
I interviewed personally - and still have this material in case one day I
will resume my C65 website - the people who were responsible of canning the
C65. The people at Commodore generally liked the C65, the main problem was
it was commercailly unviable.
>> My opinion is that, with C65 bashers, it's always a matter of sour
>> grapes.
>
> I don't think so. It's not a question of bashing anyway, it's a question
> of usefulness. Playing C64 games you can do on any C64, you don't need a
> C65 for that. The ENIAC and Difference Engine both served a specific
> purpose. So what the makes the C65 in it's native mode so useful in your
> opinion?
Playing C64 games on a C65 is just one of the things you can do. In native
mode, the C65 has a very good graphic palette, comparable to the Amiga
500's, a new spin-off of the 6502 CPU ( the 65CE02 running at 3.5 Mhz ),
with additional instructions and registers, stereo output, expandibility up
to 8 Mb and, last but not least, a wonderful BASIC interpreter, with loads
of new interesting instructions and capabilities. Trust me, it's a great
machine if you're a fan of the C64 and grew up with Commodore computers.
It's the ultime Commodore 8-bit machine. There is not software for it? Most
of us Commodore users know how to write little proggies anyway, so I don't
see that as a problem: if there's something I'll need from my C65,
eventually I'll write the program myself, like the old days.
If you speak strictly about usefulness of a C65... The C65 is as useless as
a C128. a +4, a VIC-20 or a C64 is. Compared to what's available nowadays,
in terms of computing, they are all outdated toys, with the C65 being the
less toy of them all.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/20/2009 8:52:53 PM
|
|
On May 20, 1:14=A0pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> <daniel.oto...@ucd.ie> wrote in message
>
> news:9d88e315-47f2-4204-b60c-3c2ba7281c0c@n4g2000vba.googlegroups.com...
> On May 19, 10:41 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> It's your opinion, which I personally found completely laughable.
And I find your opinion to be a steaming pile. Wow, that's what
happens when two people disagree and then we see who can make the best
jokes about the other guy huh.
> Following
> your logic, the ENIAC is probably a worthless piece of trash as well. May=
be
> Babbage's =A0Difference Engine is crap too, because it has no software. B=
ut
> again, hey, it's your opinion.
They did/do what they were made to do and were fundamental milestones
in human civilization. However rare or however "crisp" the display is,
the C65 is not in that category.
> > My opinion is that, with C65 bashers, it's always a matter of sour grap=
es.
I was nearly going to add "and that's not sour grapes" to my post, but
I thought, hey it's Riccardo, so why bother? You'll just get the usual
aggressive BS no matter what you say because you don't agree with him.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/20/2009 11:07:06 PM
|
|
On May 20, 9:52=A0pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> If you speak strictly about usefulness of a C65... The C65 is as useless =
as
> a C128. a +4, a VIC-20 or a C64 is. Compared to what's available nowadays=
,
> in terms of computing, they are all outdated toys, with the C65 being the
> less toy of them all.
I don't have to write all my own software, make all my own peripherals
or talk to myself all the time with any of those computers. MESS has a
C65 implementation, so I'm sure you'll show us "all" the great things
you've gotten the C65 to do sometime.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/20/2009 11:10:16 PM
|
|
On May 20, 1:14=A0pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> My opinion is that, with C65 bashers, it's always a matter of sour grapes=
..
>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm
From: "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:40:14 +0200
Local: Fri, May 15 2009 6:40 am
Subject: Re: C65
It's been ages since I played with my units
"Ages"? You'd think you'd use the greatest Commodore 8 bit ever made a
bit more often, especially as you're writing all those "proggies" to
do so many amazing things.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/20/2009 11:38:49 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:831a38cb-47b7-426e-9829-93d42c82f90e@g20g2000vba.googlegroups.com...
On May 20, 1:14 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>
>"Ages"? You'd think you'd use the greatest Commodore 8 bit ever made a
>bit more often, especially as you're writing all those "proggies" to
>do so many amazing things.
I don't have that much time anymore. You know, acne infested losers like
you, living at mommy's home and posting bullshit over the internet tend to
forget there's people around the world who actually wake up at 6:00 in the
morning to hop in the car and go to work. That's how I paid those C65, son:
by working hard and getting paid. Besides, I am not 20 anymore, sadly, and I
don't have time anymore to play with all the things I have. Not that I
really have to justify what I do with my time with you.
Don't worry, sooner or later I'll publish some C65 pics on the net, so you
can post more specific "sour grapes" stuff.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/21/2009 4:55:21 AM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:83a2d2b0-7d01-42d5-a090-f50265a9712e@s21g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
>> Following
>> your logic, the ENIAC is probably a worthless piece of trash as well.
>> Maybe
>> Babbage's Difference Engine is crap too, because it has no software. But
>> again, hey, it's your opinion.
>
> They did/do what they were made to do and were fundamental milestones
> in human civilization. However rare or however "crisp" the display is,
> the C65 is not in that category.
You are really a poor nobody to say what fits in what category. Apart from a
degree in sour grapes, do you also have a degree into anything related to
computing?
> > My opinion is that, with C65 bashers, it's always a matter of sour
> > grapes.
> I was nearly going to add "and that's not sour grapes" to my post, but
> I thought, hey it's Riccardo, so why bother? You'll just get the usual
> aggressive BS no matter what you say because you don't agree with him.
You can say it's not sour grapes as much as you want, but that's so obvious,
O'Tool(e), you're the one who stepped his foot aggressively inside this
discussion, so you're not really fooling anyone but yourself.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/21/2009 5:00:34 AM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:9d214816-2409-4575-954a-db0cb86178ec@o14g2000vbo.googlegroups.com...
>I don't have to write all my own software, make all my own peripherals
>or talk to myself all the time with any of those computers. MESS has a
>C65 implementation, so I'm sure you'll show us "all" the great things
>you've gotten the C65 to do sometime.
ROTFL...Ahhhhh, the wonderful MESS implementation!!!
Sorry, I just forgot how great it is. That "implementation" works as good as
the hamster that is running inside your skull.
By the way: I don't really have to show you anything, (O')Tool(e). I don't
buy things to show off, I buy things because I like them.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/21/2009 5:15:30 AM
|
|
On May 21, 6:00=A0am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> You are really a poor nobody to say what fits in what category. Apart fro=
m a
> degree in sour grapes, do you also have a degree into anything related to
> computing?
Wow, imagine if that was relevant. Why can't you just tell me why the
C65 was as historically important as ENIAC or the Difference Engine
instead of just telling me you're right because you have a degree?
Oh, is it because you can't?
> You can say it's not sour grapes as much as you want, but that's so obvio=
us,
> O'Tool(e), you're the one who stepped his foot aggressively inside this
> discussion, so you're not really fooling anyone but yourself.
Well Dick Rubin(i), do you like rubbin' your dick?
Face facts you big baby, there is no way of phrasing anything that
doesn't agree with you that you won't take as a personal insult.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/21/2009 8:31:36 AM
|
|
On May 21, 5:55=A0am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> I don't have that much time anymore.
Wow, that's a brilliant excuse for never using "the best 8 bit machine
ever". Very convincing. Wanna run for office?
> You know, acne infested losers like
> you, living at mommy's home and posting bullshit over the internet
Whoa, hold on there a minute. There's at least 2 or 3 pathetically
unoriginal insults you forgot to put in there.
> tend to
> forget there's people around the world who actually wake up at 6:00 in th=
e
> morning to hop in the car and go to work. That's how I paid those C65, so=
n:
> by working hard and getting paid.
So? WTF does how much you get paid have to do with whether the C65 is
a brilliant computer to own or not? I've got a 15 inch penis but you
don't see me mentioning that in connection to how useful any computer
is.
> Besides, I am not 20 anymore, sadly, and I
> don't have time anymore to play with all the things I have. Not that I
> really have to justify what I do with my time with you.
You don't have to justify anything to anybody. But you do have to look
like a uber-jackass if you want to tell us the C65 is brilliant
because of a the never utilised hardware features that you couldn't
even be bothered to implement yourself.
> Don't worry, sooner or later I'll publish some C65 pics on the net, so yo=
u
> can post more specific "sour grapes" stuff.
Nonsensical. I think you were trying to insult me again but you
could've been playing Beethoven's 5th on your keyboard for all I know.
I've seen pictures of C65s already thanks.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/21/2009 8:40:39 AM
|
|
On May 21, 6:15=A0am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> <daniel.oto...@ucd.ie> wrote in message
>
> news:9d214816-2409-4575-954a-db0cb86178ec@o14g2000vbo.googlegroups.com...
>
> >I don't have to write all my own software, make all my own peripherals
> >or talk to myself all the time with any of those computers. MESS has a
> >C65 implementation, so I'm sure you'll show us "all" the great things
> >you've gotten the C65 to do sometime.
>
> ROTFL...Ahhhhh, the wonderful MESS implementation!!!
>
> Sorry, I just forgot how great it is. That "implementation" works as good=
as
> the hamster that is running inside your skull.
>
> By the way: I don't really have to show you anything, (O')Tool(e). I don'=
t
> buy things to show off, I buy things because I like them.
Yes, Dick Rub(ini) you don't. Then again you're the only person
writing software to exploit the C65 hardware (apparently), so how will
we ever know how great it is unless you put your degree in typing or
whatever to good use?
The fact that the MESS C65 is so crap is pretty direct evidence of how
many people give a rat's ass about the C65.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/21/2009 8:45:11 AM
|
|
Riccardo Rubini wrote:
> "Clocky" <nicetry@migo.com> wrote in message
> news:002fee20$0$9716$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
>
>> Just think about some of the crap C= did release yet C= didn't bother
>> releasing the C65, that in itself speaks volumes about what they
>> themselves thought of it ;-)
>
> I interviewed personally - and still have this material in case one
> day I will resume my C65 website - the people who were responsible of
> canning the C65. The people at Commodore generally liked the C65, the
> main problem was it was commercailly unviable.
>
>>> My opinion is that, with C65 bashers, it's always a matter of sour
>>> grapes.
>>
>> I don't think so. It's not a question of bashing anyway, it's a
>> question of usefulness. Playing C64 games you can do on any C64, you
>> don't need a C65 for that. The ENIAC and Difference Engine both
>> served a specific purpose. So what the makes the C65 in it's native
>> mode so useful in your opinion?
>
> Playing C64 games on a C65 is just one of the things you can do. In
> native mode, the C65 has a very good graphic palette, comparable to
> the Amiga 500's, a new spin-off of the 6502 CPU ( the 65CE02 running
> at 3.5 Mhz ), with additional instructions and registers, stereo
> output, expandibility up to 8 Mb and, last but not least, a wonderful
> BASIC interpreter, with loads of new interesting instructions and
> capabilities. Trust me, it's a great machine if you're a fan of the
> C64 and grew up with Commodore computers. It's the ultime Commodore
> 8-bit machine. There is not software for it? Most of us Commodore
> users know how to write little proggies anyway, so I don't see that
> as a problem: if there's something I'll need from my C65, eventually
> I'll write the program myself, like the old days.
> If you speak strictly about usefulness of a C65... The C65 is as
> useless as a C128. a +4, a VIC-20 or a C64 is. Compared to what's
> available nowadays, in terms of computing, they are all outdated
> toys, with the C65 being the less toy of them all.
>
Yes, but none of those equally useless computers come with a $5000 pricetag
;-)
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Clocky
|
5/21/2009 10:55:23 AM
|
|
daniel.otoole@ucd.ie wrote:
> I've got a 15 inch penis but you
> don't see me mentioning that in connection to how useful any computer
> is.
pics or it didnt happen !!!!!
--
http://www.hitmen-console.org http://magicdisk.untergrund.net
http://www.pokefinder.org http://ftp.pokefinder.org
Back in time we were young and motivated. Today we are only young.
<RRR>
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Groepaz
|
5/21/2009 12:14:58 PM
|
|
daniel.otoole@ucd.ie schreef:
> On May 21, 5:55 am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> I don't have that much time anymore.
>
> Wow, that's a brilliant excuse for never using "the best 8 bit machine
> ever". Very convincing. Wanna run for office?
>
>> You know, acne infested losers like
>> you, living at mommy's home and posting bullshit over the internet
>
> Whoa, hold on there a minute. There's at least 2 or 3 pathetically
> unoriginal insults you forgot to put in there.
>
>> tend to
>> forget there's people around the world who actually wake up at 6:00 in the
>> morning to hop in the car and go to work. That's how I paid those C65, son:
>> by working hard and getting paid.
>
> So? WTF does how much you get paid have to do with whether the C65 is
> a brilliant computer to own or not? I've got a 15 inch penis but you
> don't see me mentioning that in connection to how useful any computer
> is.
Nor did you tell us how hard you had to work to be able to afford to get
it enlarged, or were you already deformed at birth?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Dombo
|
5/21/2009 12:28:13 PM
|
|
Groepaz schreef:
> daniel.otoole@ucd.ie wrote:
>
>
>> I've got a 15 inch penis but you
>> don't see me mentioning that in connection to how useful any computer
>> is.
>
> pics or it didnt happen !!!!!
Do you enjoy watching penises of other men?
Fortunately comp.sys.cbm is text only.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Dombo
|
5/21/2009 12:31:50 PM
|
|
On May 21, 1:28=A0pm, Dombo <do...@disposable.invalid> wrote:
> Nor did you tell us how hard you had to work to be able to afford to get
> it enlarged, or were you already deformed at birth?
Yeah, that's what my girlfriends call it, "deformed".
Anyway, I never said it was my own penis. 4% formaldehyde in phosphate
buffered saline will keep most human tissues looking display quality
for years.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/21/2009 1:06:50 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:4e4a115e-4073-4cd8-8228-f01edee20d87@f16g2000vbf.googlegroups.com...
> Yes, Dick Rub(ini) you don't. Then again you're the only person
> writing software to exploit the C65 hardware (apparently), so how will
I am not the only one. Andre Kaesmacher wrote some very neat stuff.
> we ever know how great it is unless you put your degree in typing or
> whatever to good use?
Tool, you'll never know anyway unless you get a C65 to run the software. In
this age of Photoshop, a picture probably is not even evidence anymore.
> The fact that the MESS C65 is so crap is pretty direct evidence of how
> many people give a rat's ass about the C65.
MESS C65 is so crap because the guy who wrote it don't even own a machine,
for starters. So, all things considered, that's quite a good achievement
from his side, yet far from reality. Now, let's compare the author of MESS
C65, who has spent prolly hours to put together something, and a fucking
nobody Irish moron called (O')Tool(e) who just bashes other people's work
and achievements and talks out of his ass. There's no need to point out
you're the only fucking useless tool around...You even bear it in the
surname anyway. Probably you've been a family of tools since Middle Age or
something.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/21/2009 5:05:13 PM
|
|
"Clocky" <nicetry@migo.com> wrote in message
news:00310d93$0$9763$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
>> If you speak strictly about usefulness of a C65... The C65 is as
>> useless as a C128. a +4, a VIC-20 or a C64 is. Compared to what's
>> available nowadays, in terms of computing, they are all outdated
>> toys, with the C65 being the less toy of them all.
>>
>
> Yes, but none of those equally useless computers come with a $5000
> pricetag ;-)
I don't know about this pricetag, Clocky. Honestly I have paid them much
much less. I agree the price has nothing to do with the actual value of the
machine itself, but it's got more to do with being a collectible and
historical item. Not all the machines around work, there are few working
ones and collectors, eventually, are ready to pay top dollar for one. I
don't know, again, I haven't had a chance to witness how things went at the
last eBay auctions.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/21/2009 5:07:17 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:88b19493-7bff-44d8-832e-f1cc50b04159@r34g2000vba.googlegroups.com...
On May 21, 5:55 am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> I don't have that much time anymore.
>
>Wow, that's a brilliant excuse for never using "the best 8 bit machine
>ever". Very convincing. Wanna run for office?
Which office? Yours? Thank you, I am not interested in the presidence of
internet (O)'Tool(e)s, it's all yours, forever, don't worry about it. And
since I paid for my C65s, I can even take a crap on them, if that is what
makes me happy, I don't need to justify my actions with anyone, including
some jealous fool from Ireland.
>> You know, acne infested losers like
>> you, living at mommy's home and posting bullshit over the internet
>
>Whoa, hold on there a minute. There's at least 2 or 3 pathetically
>unoriginal insults you forgot to put in there.
I don't have to be original as much as you don't have to be intelligent; in
fact, you are not.
>> tend to
>> forget there's people around the world who actually wake up at 6:00 in
>> the
>> morning to hop in the car and go to work. That's how I paid those C65,
>> son:
>> by working hard and getting paid.
>
> So? WTF does how much you get paid have to do with whether the C65 is
> a brilliant computer to own or not?
Nothing, indeed, you pulled this nonsense question out of your ass and
completely out of context, with the fallacious hope to put me in trouble or
something. You play tricks a 2 years old would outsmart you at.
I was just trying to explain to you - though unfortunately you removed your
original moronic remark to make your stupid trick less pathetic - why I
don't have time: because I got a normal life and I have stuff to do to make
a living and, eventually, buy things you can only dream of or wank at in
your tiny bedroom. That is me and, on the other hand, there is you, who live
like a parasite somewhere in Ireland or something, at your parents' expenses
I imagine, wanking all day long in front of the computer or measuring your
microscopic penis with Barbie's ruler to feel more manish about your genital
deficency. Maybe you got to time for playing with your Commodore's, but
unfortunately I have very little. I'd wish I have more.
>I've got a 15 inch penis but you
>don't see me mentioning that in connection to how useful any computer
>is.
If your penis is so long, I see why your ass is broken. I would have bet you
used to put just your own head into it, so probably you use to do both.
Guess you like it too, huh? Not only you get owned on the Internet, you also
manage to own yourself. That's really something to be proud about, Danny
boy.
>> Besides, I am not 20 anymore, sadly, and I
>> don't have time anymore to play with all the things I have. Not that I
>> really have to justify what I do with my time with you.
>
>You don't have to justify anything to anybody.
Now you get it! The hamster in your brain finally woke up?
> But you do have to look
>like a uber-jackass if you want to tell us the C65 is brilliant
>because of a the never utilised hardware features that you couldn't
>even be bothered to implement yourself.
Uber-jackass? First off, learn to spell German, then, the C65 has brilliant
features, for being an 8-bit machine from 1992 and the heir of the C64/C128
heritage, whether I personally implement anything or not. Does the fact I
personally have never stepped my foot on the Moon make the Moon less
interesting? Does the fact Armstrong has never been on the Moon again make
the Moon less awesome? Your logic is so flawed, you fucking tool, there's
actually more logic in a piece of poop returing to the butthole.
>> Don't worry, sooner or later I'll publish some C65 pics on the net, so
>> you
>> can post more specific "sour grapes" stuff.
>
>Nonsensical. I think you were trying to insult me again but you
>could've been playing Beethoven's 5th on your keyboard for all I know.
I agree, you are too much of a fucking tool to even understand when people
are insulting you or not. Anything more than a cross and a circle is beyond
your trainwreck of thoughts anyway. Don't bother even trying.
>I've seen pictures of C65s already thanks.
Sour grapes, tool. Sour grapes...
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/21/2009 5:33:38 PM
|
|
Riccardo Rubini wrote:
> "Clocky" <nicetry@migo.com> wrote in message
> news:00310d93$0$9763$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
>
>>> If you speak strictly about usefulness of a C65... The C65 is as
>>> useless as a C128. a +4, a VIC-20 or a C64 is. Compared to what's
>>> available nowadays, in terms of computing, they are all outdated
>>> toys, with the C65 being the less toy of them all.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, but none of those equally useless computers come with a $5000
>> pricetag ;-)
>
> I don't know about this pricetag, Clocky. Honestly I have paid them
> much much less. I agree the price has nothing to do with the actual
> value of the machine itself, but it's got more to do with being a
> collectible and historical item.
Indeed, that is what I was driving at.
Not all the machines around work,
> there are few working ones and collectors, eventually, are ready to
> pay top dollar for one. I don't know, again, I haven't had a chance
> to witness how things went at the last eBay auctions.
>
> Riccardo
I'm glad you collected the C65's when you did because you are at the very
least an active member of the community with a real interest in the actual
computer. FWIW.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Clocky
|
5/21/2009 6:33:29 PM
|
|
"Clocky" <nicetry@migo.com> wrote in message
news:003178f2$0$9751$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
>> I don't know about this pricetag, Clocky. Honestly I have paid them
>> much much less. I agree the price has nothing to do with the actual
>> value of the machine itself, but it's got more to do with being a
>> collectible and historical item.
>
> Indeed, that is what I was driving at.
Oh, and I definitely agree with you on that. The computer itself is
obviously an outdated machine, but it retains its value because its unique.
If you think about it, golden C64 used to go as much as the C65, when I
bought my computers. I could have bought a golden C64 but... For what?
Collectionism, certainly. The C65, anyway, unifies both collectionism and
the features of a machine unique in its own might, you can do actually
something with it or enjoy programming. I optimized the PALs the computer
came with and used GALs, wrote some little utilities in BASIC 10. It is fun
and it has historical value. Is it worth 5000$? Hard to say, really. If
we're talking merely about the machine's features, definitely not.
Historical value... Then we're dwelving in a completely different territory.
> Not all the machines around work,
>> there are few working ones and collectors, eventually, are ready to
>> pay top dollar for one. I don't know, again, I haven't had a chance
>> to witness how things went at the last eBay auctions.
>>
>> Riccardo
>
> I'm glad you collected the C65's when you did because you are at the very
> least an active member of the community with a real interest in the actual
> computer. FWIW.
Thanks, I'd wish I'd have more time to finally bring back my C65 homepage as
I had it envisioned from the start, so that others can also enjoy something
out of what I have, without spending the money I've spent :-) Heh :-\
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/21/2009 7:06:32 PM
|
|
Dick Rubbing, I'm glad you used such a huge percentage of your
valuable C65 programming/ignoring time to type this self defeating
tripe. You say the MESS C65 is awful and then claim that *I* was
bashing the author?
You correct my German spelling while getting a Z minus in basic
English yourself?
You tell us you're a high paid computer genius who can afford C65s
then tell us you got them all cheap?
The great thing about you Dick Rubbing is for a few lines of outlay
you'll just keep on shovelling out this self-contradictory tripe for
all of eternity and do my job for me.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/21/2009 8:09:48 PM
|
|
And Dick Rubbing, before you have make another laughable attempt at
having a go at Ireland, a quick check of the facts show that the only
thing you're better at than us is letting babies die. Well done on
that. You do your mothers proud.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/21/2009 8:18:19 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:a08f8249-675b-43eb-a2bd-a63bad6e194e@h11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> Dick Rubbing, I'm glad you used such a huge percentage of your
> valuable C65 programming/ignoring time to type this self defeating
> tripe.
It takes me seconds to bash a moron like you. You are no match with me.
> You say the MESS C65 is awful and then claim that *I* was
> bashing the author?
MESS C65 is awful and far from reality, as an emulator so, as you stupidly
suggested, it's not a good substitute for a real C65; as the experiment of a
lone coder, who doesn't even own a machine himself, it's quite something and
I respect his work in that perspective.When you compare the work of this guy
to what you have done so far for the Commodore community - that is, letting
your ass loose on the Internet, bashing others over a typical sour grapes
issue - it's clear who earns people's respect and who earns people's
disgust.
> You correct my German spelling while getting a Z minus in basic
> English yourself?
I have been certified for "proficiency" in English by a very famous
institution. But probably you know better, right? I am sure you can show us
a certificate in being a dumbass, signed by your ass itself. I don't even
ask you whether you can actually read/write/speak any other language than
Irish English, because you obviously can't. My English isn't that good,
probably, I ain't no native tongue, dude, but what about your German? Your
Italian? Your French? Your Spanish?
> You tell us you're a high paid computer genius who can afford C65s
> then tell us you got them all cheap?
Cheap and expensive have no meaning if they don't relate to some consistent,
factual value, you little shit. Compared to the money figures we talked
about in this thread, I got them all cheap; compared to 20$, I got them
_really_ expensive.
> The great thing about you Dick Rubbing is for a few lines of outlay
> you'll just keep on shovelling out this self-contradictory tripe for
> all of eternity and do my job for me.
>
The great thing about Danny (O')Tool(e) is he's not aware when he makes an
ass out of his poor self; worse, he thinks of himself as a great winner,
when, in fact, he's the utmost loser. Go and grab a clue, Tool.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/21/2009 8:38:11 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:771db367-de4f-40b6-bcca-cf03043ec61a@g1g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> And Dick Rubbing, before you have make another laughable attempt at
> having a go at Ireland, a quick check of the facts show that the only
> thing you're better at than us is letting babies die. Well done on
> that. You do your mothers proud.
Tool, I don't give a fuck about Ireland, Thailand, Italy, Nigeria or
whatever. I enjoy the company of normal Irish guys, not as much as the
company of Irish women, but still enough and as much as I do with anyone
from any country. If you suffer from some mick complex, I am sorry for you,
I don't suffer from any wop complex to eventually sympathize with your
inferiority feelings. Also, I don't give a rat's ass about what Italy is
worse at, in terms of religion, and I don't care which country is "best" -
whatever that means. You're the only one here busy measuring his own dick to
prove he's the best around, which actually speaks volumes about your pitiful
self esteem, so please go and measure every dick in Ireland, then do the
same here in Italy and finally tell us which is the country with the better
average, and hence, "the best" country. Not that I give a shit, again, but
if you do that, at least we'd get rid of you for quite some time.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/21/2009 8:50:53 PM
|
|
On May 21, 9:50=A0pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> Tool, I don't give a fuck about Ireland
Dick, it takes less than one second to make sh1t of your comments
On May 21, 6:05 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>and a fucking
> nobody Irish moron
On May 21, 6:33 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> somewhere in Ireland or something
On May 21, 6:33 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> some jealous fool from Ireland.
So three different times you bring the country I'm in up and as soon
as I point out it's the Garden Of Eden compared to your shithole you
decide you don't give a fuck?
Oh, and you never did manage to answer why it's so important for you
to tell the world what a rich and brilliant programmer you are when
apparently you got all your C65s on the cheap.
If you don't give a fuck about Ireland or w
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/21/2009 9:47:26 PM
|
|
On May 21, 9:38 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> It takes me seconds to bash a moron like you. You are no match with me.
And no match "with" your certified fantastic English.
> Cheap and expensive have no meaning if they don't relate to some consistent,
> factual value, you little shit. Compared to the money figures we talked
> about in this thread, I got them all cheap; compared to 20$, I got them
> _really_ expensive.
Poorly translated from gibberish. Or into gibberish. Or probably both.
You are really rich so you can afford them but they were quite cheap.
Very good. Got it.
> Go and grab a clue, Tool.
Yes Dick Rub.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/21/2009 9:54:55 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:095d27a0-bd20-457c-b61a-1ab4f2e3ab63@g19g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
On May 21, 6:00 am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> You are really a poor nobody to say what fits in what category. Apart from
> a
> degree in sour grapes, do you also have a degree into anything related to
> computing?
> Wow, imagine if that was relevant. Why can't you just tell me why the
> C65 was as historically important as ENIAC or the Difference Engine
> instead of just telling me you're right because you have a degree?
Because it's a unique 8-bit machine, with unique features and peculiarities,
coming from an historical, very famous, computer brand, with a huge
following worldwide still today. I'm talking about Commodore, in case you
don't get it. I am not taking about IBM or HP.
> Oh, is it because you can't?
Two lines above...
>> You can say it's not sour grapes as much as you want, but that's so
>> obvious,
>> O'Tool(e), you're the one who stepped his foot aggressively inside this
>> discussion, so you're not really fooling anyone but yourself.
>
>Well Dick Rubin(i), do you like rubbin' your dick?
That's an interesting question, Tool, but I can't figure out what that has
to do with owning and liking a Commodore C65. Maybe you were misled to
believe by some evil ghoul that's the proper way to power-on a rare
computer?
>Face facts you big baby, there is no way of phrasing anything that doesn't
>agree with you that you won't take as a personal insult.
Actually I still don't know whether I should feel insulted or amused by your
inane words and idiocy. I will let you know when I'll make up my mind.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/21/2009 10:03:44 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:be3f5894-05ce-4db6-b9d2-b2148b754073@i6g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
On May 21, 9:50 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> Tool, I don't give a fuck about Ireland
Dick, it takes less than one second to make sh1t of your comments
On May 21, 6:05 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>and a fucking
> nobody Irish moron
On May 21, 6:33 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> somewhere in Ireland or something
On May 21, 6:33 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> some jealous fool from Ireland.
> So three different times you bring the country I'm in up and as soon
> as I point out it's the Garden Of Eden compared to your shithole you
> decide you don't give a fuck?
It is so clear you suffer from a mick complex it really is amusing. Saying
that you're from Ireland doesn't mean Ireland is as pitiful as you are. I
never said that and even a retard with a pea sized brain can figure that
out, all on his own, yet you can't! Calling you a retard is an insult to the
special olympics.
> Oh, and you never did manage to answer why it's so important for you
> to tell the world what a rich and brilliant programmer you are when
> apparently you got all your C65s on the cheap.
I never said that but, anyway, if I got my C65's "cheap" ( comparatively to
what? ) that just proves I am a smart guy. Nobody in his sane mind would
want to pay for an item more than necessary - except maybe for yourself?
> If you don't give a fuck about Ireland or w
Or w?
Hmm...
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/21/2009 10:06:22 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:b69725d6-287c-4c08-bd5f-ab3602fff289@h11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> On May 21, 9:38 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> It takes me seconds to bash a moron like you. You are no match with me.
>
> And no match "with" your certified fantastic English.
>
>> Cheap and expensive have no meaning if they don't relate to some
>> consistent,
>> factual value, you little shit. Compared to the money figures we talked
>> about in this thread, I got them all cheap; compared to 20$, I got them
>> _really_ expensive.
>
> Poorly translated from gibberish. Or into gibberish. Or probably both.
> You are really rich so you can afford them but they were quite cheap.
> Very good. Got it.
I am not rich and, again, I don't know what you mean for "quite cheap" but,
anyway, do you really believe rich people got rich by paying more than
necessary? LOL
>> Go and grab a clue, Tool.
>
> Yes Dick Rub.
Tool , you're really short of fresh air, after all the (brain) farts you
have incaoutiously dropped in here. Come on, simply accept defeat, call it a
day and go take a nap. That's the best thing you can do, right now.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/21/2009 10:10:47 PM
|
|
On May 21, 11:03 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> Because it's a unique 8-bit machine, with unique features and peculiarities,
> coming from an historical, very famous, computer brand, with a huge
> following worldwide still today. I'm talking about Commodore, in case you
> don't get it. I am not taking about IBM or HP.
So? I prefer Commodore to IBM, but that still doesn't address THE
POINT that the C65 is not as important as ENIAC or the Difference
Engine. None of the ways you describe it say it is.
> >> You can say it's not sour grapes as much as you want, but that's so
> >> obvious,
And as I already squashed that with, there is no possible scenario
where somebody can say the C65 isn't all that important where you
won't pull your sour grapes line.
> >> O'Tool(e), you're the one who stepped his foot aggressively inside this
> >> discussion, so you're not really fooling anyone but yourself.
This is pretty easy for anybody interested to check you dumbass, but
my first post in this thread said abosolutely nothing about YOU. Then
you came back saying my opinion was laughable and I had sour grapes.
Wow, you're flexible enough to put both feet in your mouth.
> >Well Dick Rubin(i), do you like rubbin' your dick?
>
> That's an interesting question, Tool, but I can't figure out what that has
> to do with owning and liking a Commodore C65. Maybe you were misled to
> believe by some evil ghoul that's the proper way to power-on a rare
> computer?
Come off it you twat. WTF is the point of asking me what that has to
do with the C65 when you've been rambling OT with irrelevant BS about
how much you earn or that you have a computer degree?
> >Face facts you big baby, there is no way of phrasing anything that doesn't
> >agree with you that you won't take as a personal insult.
>
> Actually I still don't know whether I should feel insulted or amused by your
> inane words and idiocy. I will let you know when I'll make up my mind.
Weak Dick. Weak.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/21/2009 10:19:02 PM
|
|
On May 21, 11:06 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> It is so clear you suffer from a mick complex
Really? You brought it up three times and I have a complex? That'd be
a superiority complex I assume as per person my country kicks your
country to a sloppy stainy pulp?
> it really is amusing. Saying
> that you're from Ireland doesn't mean Ireland is as pitiful as you are.
So why did you bring it up THREE TIMES you asshole? Stuck for filler
were you?
> I never said that but, anyway, if I got my C65's "cheap" ( comparatively to
> what? ) that just proves I am a smart guy.
Oh, sorry, you've just proved how smart you are. I must have make a
grave error in judging all your illogical, self-defeating,
contradictory muck as such when you've now PROVEN yourself to be a
smart guy.
> Nobody in his sane mind would
> want to pay for an item more than necessary - except maybe for yourself?
Ouch, I felt that in my heart. Truly.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/21/2009 10:27:50 PM
|
|
On May 21, 11:10 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> I am not rich and, again, I don't know what you mean for "quite cheap" but,
> anyway, do you really believe rich people got rich by paying more than
> necessary? LOL
Well we have no idea what YOU mean by relatively cheap as you won't
tell us how much you paid for them.
You're laughing at your own jokes Dick, not healthy.
> Tool , you're really short of fresh air, after all the (brain) farts you
> have incaoutiously dropped in here. Come on, simply accept defeat, call it a
> day and go take a nap. That's the best thing you can do, right now.
Dick Rubbin, if you're not up to it that's fine. I can't help it if
you have an inferiority complex when you compare yourself to us Micks.
Maybe you should stop letting your babies die and you'll feel better.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/21/2009 10:35:03 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:53760f2d-2313-478b-bfef-1b66c560e501@37g2000yqp.googlegroups.com...
> So? I prefer Commodore to IBM, but that still doesn't address THE
> POINT that the C65 is not as important as ENIAC or the Difference
> Engine. None of the ways you describe it say it is.
If you don't see why it's important, expecially to Commodore enthusiasts
worldwide, I really can't help you with that. As I said in my first post,
it's your opinion. Laughable, but still your opinion.
>> >> You can say it's not sour grapes as much as you want, but that's so
>> >> obvious,
>
> And as I already squashed that with, there is no possible scenario
> where somebody can say the C65 isn't all that important where you
> won't pull your sour grapes line.
Some say we live in infinite space, which leads to infinite possibilities.
The fact you can't envision a certain scenario doesn't mean it doesn't
exist. It's just that you're limited and can't see it.
>> >> O'Tool(e), you're the one who stepped his foot aggressively inside
>> >> this
>> >> discussion, so you're not really fooling anyone but yourself.
>
> This is pretty easy for anybody interested to check you dumbass, but
> my first post in this thread said abosolutely nothing about YOU. Then
> you came back saying my opinion was laughable and I had sour grapes.
> Wow, you're flexible enough to put both feet in your mouth.
Yep, you called useless a machine made by some of the best engineers
Commodore had, some are the same who brought you the C64, the C128 and
computers the majority of us, here, still love pretty much. Some of these
engineers have also passed away, one of them brought the world the AMD K7,
others had a great career at Cirrus Logic, etc., still you dare to call
their hard work crap. Can you please explain us who the fuck are you to
criticize the work of well respected Commodore engineers and call a machine
useless, excpecially in the context of a channel were 99.9% of people don't
find it as such?
>> >Well Dick Rubin(i), do you like rubbin' your dick?
>>
>> That's an interesting question, Tool, but I can't figure out what that
>> has
>> to do with owning and liking a Commodore C65. Maybe you were misled to
>> believe by some evil ghoul that's the proper way to power-on a rare
>> computer?
>
> Come off it you twat. WTF is the point of asking me what that has to
> do with the C65 when you've been rambling OT with irrelevant BS about
> how much you earn or that you have a computer degree?
I have never said how much I earn - I am not the Tool here - and I haven't
said a word about my degree. I do have a degree, but I didn't say it. What I
said was:
-- snip --
Apart from a degree in sour grapes, do you also have a degree into anything
related to
computing?
-- snip --
And I am still awaiting for an answer.
> Weak Dick. Weak.
You have a weak dick? Try some Viagra, Danny. It won't make it any longer,
but at least you might get a mojo looking at those C65 pictures you secretly
hide under your pillow...
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/21/2009 10:36:19 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:17abdf7b-4860-4362-8a5a-9b74213ce6c0@r33g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> On May 21, 11:06 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> It is so clear you suffer from a mick complex
>
> Really? You brought it up three times and I have a complex? That'd be
> a superiority complex I assume as per person my country kicks your
> country to a sloppy stainy pulp?
>
>> it really is amusing. Saying
>> that you're from Ireland doesn't mean Ireland is as pitiful as you are.
>
> So why did you bring it up THREE TIMES you asshole? Stuck for filler
> were you?
You really have a bad mick complex, dude. I didn't count how many times I
said Ireland, but it seems you have a big problem being reminded about being
Irish. How come? What's wrong about being Irish?
>> I never said that but, anyway, if I got my C65's "cheap" ( comparatively
>> to
>> what? ) that just proves I am a smart guy.
>
> Oh, sorry, you've just proved how smart you are. I must have make a
> grave error in judging all your illogical, self-defeating,
> contradictory muck as such when you've now PROVEN yourself to be a
> smart guy.
I am a smart guy and the worst thing you did was trying to outsmart me in a
flame when you can only outsmart people making a complete fool out of
yourself.
>> Nobody in his sane mind would
>> want to pay for an item more than necessary - except maybe for yourself?
>
> Ouch, I felt that in my heart. Truly.
Call it a day, dude. Your drivel is way past expiration date.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/21/2009 10:39:50 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:6939b0cf-08f9-4732-9190-5d16bc65d749@j18g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
> On May 21, 11:10 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> I am not rich and, again, I don't know what you mean for "quite cheap"
>> but,
>> anyway, do you really believe rich people got rich by paying more than
>> necessary? LOL
>
> Well we have no idea what YOU mean by relatively cheap as you won't
> tell us how much you paid for them.
I didn't say how much I paid for my units, but I said it was cheaper than
10.000$ or 5000$. Why should I be more specific about my business? I think
what I said is enough.
> You're laughing at your own jokes Dick, not healthy.
Nah, we're quite a few people, actually.
>> Tool , you're really short of fresh air, after all the (brain) farts you
>> have incaoutiously dropped in here. Come on, simply accept defeat, call
>> it a
>> day and go take a nap. That's the best thing you can do, right now.
>
> Dick Rubbin, if you're not up to it that's fine. I can't help it if
> you have an inferiority complex when you compare yourself to us Micks.
Really I do? I never ever noticed that. Surely you live up to some bad
stereotypes, Danny. Actually, you have such a bad temper I'd say you're an
Italian in disguise.
> Maybe you should stop letting your babies die and you'll feel better.
I didn't notice about my babies dying either. Sounds scary, though. Tell me
something, do you also hear voices in your head?
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/21/2009 10:46:59 PM
|
|
On May 21, 11:36 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> If you don't see why it's important, expecially to Commodore enthusiasts
> worldwide, I really can't help you with that. As I said in my first post,
> it's your opinion. Laughable, but still your opinion.
That's not the same point and you know it. Important to a Commodore
fan and important as regards the history of computing are not the same
thing and you can't pretend they are with writing MORON in big letters
on your forehead.
> Some say we live in infinite space, which leads to infinite possibilities.
> The fact you can't envision a certain scenario doesn't mean it doesn't
> exist. It's just that you're limited and can't see it.
You can see infinite possibilites? That's good for you and your dealer
Dick.
> Yep, you called useless a machine made by some of the best engineers
> Commodore had, some are the same who brought you the C64, the C128 and
> computers the majority of us, here, still love pretty much. Some of these
> engineers have also passed away, one of them brought the world the AMD K7,
> others had a great career at Cirrus Logic, etc., still you dare to call
> their hard work crap. Can you please explain us who the fuck are you to
> criticize the work of well respected Commodore engineers and call a machine
> useless, excpecially in the context of a channel were 99.9% of people don't
> find it as such?
You're using "crap" and "useless" interchangeably there but thankfully
everybody can see that as we're adults. Don't try and "recruit" C=
lovers here using something I didn't say you lying shit.
> I have never said how much I earn - I am not the Tool here - and I haven't
> said a word about my degree. I do have a degree, but I didn't say it. What I
> said was:
Fine then, if you don't have one either why did you bring it up as
evidence I know nothing about computers? Do you have a third foot to
stick in that mouth?
> You have a weak dick? Try some Viagra, Danny. It won't make it any longer,
> but at least you might get a mojo looking at those C65 pictures you secretly
> hide under your pillow...
Wow, deliberately misinterpreting a comment for "comedic" effect. Well
done Dick.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/21/2009 10:52:43 PM
|
|
On May 21, 11:39 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> You really have a bad mick complex, dude. I didn't count how many times I
> said Ireland, but it seems you have a big problem being reminded about being
> Irish. How come? What's wrong about being Irish?
Sorry Dick, you can't bring up the country I'm in out of the blue
three times and then pretend it's me that has a complex about it,
especially after I've clearly shown you that the average Mick is doing
pretty f.ing sweet thanks. Please remind again about the great country
I'm in. No, please.
> I am a smart guy and the worst thing you did was trying to outsmart me in a
> flame when you can only outsmart people making a complete fool out of
> yourself.
I can outsmart people by making a fool of myself? Does that work for
you Dick? You'll hurt your teeth gritting them like that after writing
such a stupid sentence.
> Call it a day, dude. Your drivel is way past expiration date.
Again he's desperate for the bell. Come on Dick, that's quittin' talk!
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/21/2009 11:00:13 PM
|
|
On May 21, 11:46=A0pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> Nah, we're quite a few people, actually.
.....
>Tell me
> something, do you also hear voices in your head?
Jesus Dick, you're a few people and you hear voices in your head? Does
one of them keep saying "you're really smart Dick, and the C65 is as
historically important as ENIAC"
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/21/2009 11:05:35 PM
|
|
Well, here is a post that is definitely not "sour grapes" as I have a
c65.
It is shit, plain and simple. Cool, because of "what it could have
been", but alas, it is an incomplete, inconsistent, kludgy piece of
crap when you get right down to it.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Dragos
|
5/22/2009 3:15:55 AM
|
|
"Riccardo Rubini" <rubini@despammed.com> wrote ...
>
> It is so clear you suffer from a mick complex it really is amusing. Saying
> that you're from Ireland doesn't mean Ireland is as pitiful as you are. I
> never said that and even a retard with a pea sized brain can figure that
> out, all on his own, yet you can't! Calling you a retard is an insult to
> the special olympics.
Score one point for Rubini !! ;-)
--
Best regards,
Sam Gillett
If you don't pay your exorcist,
will you become repossessed?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Sam
|
5/22/2009 3:32:10 AM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:d902ff02-4d3c-4cab-9646-1865ab7e7269@z5g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> On May 21, 11:39 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> You really have a bad mick complex, dude. I didn't count how many times I
>> said Ireland, but it seems you have a big problem being reminded about
>> being
>> Irish. How come? What's wrong about being Irish?
>
> Sorry Dick, you can't bring up the country I'm in out of the blue
> three times and then pretend it's me that has a complex about it,
> especially after I've clearly shown you that the average Mick is doing
> pretty f.ing sweet thanks. Please remind again about the great country
> I'm in. No, please.
Actually, if we were to look at you as the ideal Irish guy, all you've shown
so far is the average mick is a fucking tool and lives up to the worst
stereotypes; anyway, we're all enough intelligent here to understand you are
not representative of Ireland, but actually you're representative of the
planet of apes. Why Dr. Zira let you out, I wonder...
>> I am a smart guy and the worst thing you did was trying to outsmart me in
>> a
>> flame when you can only outsmart people making a complete fool out of
>> yourself.
>
> I can outsmart people by making a fool of myself?
Yes, if there were to be such a nice competition, definitely.That's your
only option to outsmart someone at something.
> Does that work for you Dick?
No, sorry I only take part in competitions about who's the smartest.
> You'll hurt your teeth gritting them like that after writing
> such a stupid sentence.
Not really. You just proved once again what a stupid motherfucker you are,
after not getting even the most obvious pun and insults. You're so dumb
that, if we didn't have a nice auditorium here, it would be useless
insulting you.
>> Call it a day, dude. Your drivel is way past expiration date.
>
> Again he's desperate for the bell. Come on Dick, that's quittin' talk!
I can go on and humiliate you forever, you know it and everybody here does
about my endurance at that... The question is: can you bare it, Tool? :-)
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/22/2009 4:42:38 AM
|
|
"Dragos" <mgladson@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e98ae71a-a614-4f2b-9dd2-50ff65b9347c@k38g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> Well, here is a post that is definitely not "sour grapes" as I have a
> c65.
Nice!
> It is shit, plain and simple. Cool, because of "what it could have
> been", but alas, it is an incomplete, inconsistent, kludgy piece of
> crap when you get right down to it.
Ok, then sell it! I am sure there will be other people *really* interested
in getting it, and you can actually make a lot of money out of a "piece of
crap" - that doesn't really happen everyday, no? It's a win-win situation.
Good luck.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/22/2009 4:52:56 AM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:9db4a914-7e28-4bbd-8072-fa5a97305837@m19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
On May 21, 11:46 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> Nah, we're quite a few people, actually.
.....
>Tell me
> something, do you also hear voices in your head?
> Jesus Dick, you're a few people and you hear voices in your head?
No, no... That's (another) rough misunderstanding, Tool. I know what other
people are saying about you...:-)))
> Does one of them keep saying "you're really smart Dick, and the C65 is as
> historically important as ENIAC"
No, one guy actually told me on Yahoo Messenger: "that dude is so full of
piss and shit, let him speak and he'll bury himself". He knows who he is
:-))
And, of course, I never said the C65 is as historically important as the
ENIAC. I said the C65 is part of computing history just as the ENIAC, the
Sinclair Spectrum or the Difference Engine are. I know, you can't tell nor
grasp the subtle difference, but it's not my fault you were born retarded.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/22/2009 5:00:09 AM
|
|
"Sam Gillett" <sgillettnospam@diespammergte.net> wrote in message
news:_0pRl.2407$wR5.1823@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
>
> "Riccardo Rubini" <rubini@despammed.com> wrote ...
>>
>> It is so clear you suffer from a mick complex it really is amusing.
>> Saying that you're from Ireland doesn't mean Ireland is as pitiful as you
>> are. I never said that and even a retard with a pea sized brain can
>> figure that out, all on his own, yet you can't! Calling you a retard is
>> an insult to the special olympics.
>
> Score one point for Rubini !! ;-)
Sam... :-)
I don't know why, but I have a feeling the rabid Irishman will go at lenghts
and say we are actually the same person now.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/22/2009 5:03:31 AM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:c374cd38-2f7f-445a-9e74-8a4a37c44647@l12g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
> On May 21, 11:36 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> If you don't see why it's important, expecially to Commodore enthusiasts
>> worldwide, I really can't help you with that. As I said in my first
>> post,
>> it's your opinion. Laughable, but still your opinion.
>
> That's not the same point and you know it. Important to a Commodore
> fan and important as regards the history of computing are not the same
> thing and you can't pretend they are with writing MORON in big letters
> on your forehead.
Here we are in a Commodore related channel, just in case you forgot it, and
I think even the utmost retarded fool would realize the opinion of the
average Joe here is biased, when it comes about the importance of Commodore
computers. Unfortunately you don't realize that. But generally, the C65 is
pretty important, because it's the last 8-bit machine produced by Commodore,
which is a very important brand in computer history, mainly because of the
C64, but also because of the 6502. How does it all compare to the ENIAC? It
doesn't directly, but it's a piece of computer history as the ENIAC is. I
haven't ever gone further than that, and even if you desperately try to read
things I didn't write, that trick is not going to work, Tool.
>> Some say we live in infinite space, which leads to infinite
>> possibilities.
>> The fact you can't envision a certain scenario doesn't mean it doesn't
>> exist. It's just that you're limited and can't see it.
>
> You can see infinite possibilites? That's good for you and your dealer
> Dick.
Yes, I can see infinite possibilities in every situation, but I understand
the only thing you manage to see in every situation is how to fuck things
up. Not everybody here is a loser like you, Tool, and you can't pretend us
to be losers so that you'd feel less of a loser yourself.
>> Yep, you called useless a machine made by some of the best engineers
>> Commodore had, some are the same who brought you the C64, the C128 and
>> computers the majority of us, here, still love pretty much. Some of these
>> engineers have also passed away, one of them brought the world the AMD
>> K7,
>> others had a great career at Cirrus Logic, etc., still you dare to call
>> their hard work crap. Can you please explain us who the fuck are you to
>> criticize the work of well respected Commodore engineers and call a
>> machine
>> useless, excpecially in the context of a channel were 99.9% of people
>> don't
>> find it as such?
>
> You're using "crap" and "useless" interchangeably there but thankfully
> everybody can see that as we're adults.
I strongly doubt you're an adult in the strict meaning of the word.
> Don't try and "recruit" C= lovers here using something I didn't say you
> lying shit.
What are you scared of? C= lovers are already laughing their asses off as I
rip you a new asshole, you are the only one who can't see this. I don't need
to do any recruitment, this is not the military, this is a fucking Commodore
newsgroup, Tool.
>> I have never said how much I earn - I am not the Tool here - and I
>> haven't
>> said a word about my degree. I do have a degree, but I didn't say it.
>> What I
>> said was:
>
> Fine then, if you don't have one either why did you bring it up as
> evidence I know nothing about computers?
I just asked, because you are so clearly uneducated it is obvious you know
shit about computing and computing history. But, you know, with the current
school system, you never know who gets a degree nowadays, even a space
monkey like yourself could have bought his, so I was asking if, other than a
degree in sour grapes, you actually earned any other degree. Get it now?
> Do you have a third foot to stick in that mouth?
Well, some women called my manhood "third foot" before, but it is not meant
to be stuck into my own mouth, I prefer the mouth of women, actually. You
know, here not everybody loves his own dick as much as you do, to the point
of actually chewing it up on his own or putting it in his own mouth. By the
way, are you still measuring yours with that Barbie's ruler or are you done
with it and moved on measuring Ken's?
>> You have a weak dick? Try some Viagra, Danny. It won't make it any
>> longer,
>> but at least you might get a mojo looking at those C65 pictures you
>> secretly
>> hide under your pillow...
>
> Wow, deliberately misinterpreting a comment for "comedic" effect. Well
> done Dick.
Yeah! It's cool how I make a complete fool out of yourself everytime, huh?
Thanks, Tool.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/22/2009 5:16:54 AM
|
|
"Groepaz" <groepaz@gmx.net> wrote ...
> daniel.otoole@ucd.ie wrote:
>
>
>> I've got a 15 inch penis but you
>> don't see me mentioning that in connection to how useful any computer
>> is.
>
> pics or it didnt happen !!!!!
I suspect that he has centimeters confused with inches... :-)
--
Best regards,
Sam Gillett
Why is the third hand on a watch
called the second hand?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Sam
|
5/22/2009 6:01:39 AM
|
|
Dombo wrote:
> Groepaz schreef:
>> daniel.otoole@ucd.ie wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I've got a 15 inch penis but you
>>> don't see me mentioning that in connection to how useful any computer
>>> is.
>>
>> pics or it didnt happen !!!!!
>
> Do you enjoy watching penises of other men?
enjoy? verification of unsubstantial claims has little to do with enjoyment
=)
--
http://www.hitmen-console.org http://magicdisk.untergrund.net
http://www.pokefinder.org http://ftp.pokefinder.org
The mystical trend of our time, which shows itself particularly in the
rampant growth of the so-called Theosophy and Spiritualism, is for me no
more than a symptom of weakness and confusion.
<Albert Einstein>
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Groepaz
|
5/22/2009 8:52:16 AM
|
|
On May 22, 5:42 am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> Actually, if we were to look at you as the ideal Irish guy, all you've shown
> so far is the average mick is a fucking tool and lives up to the worst
> stereotypes; anyway, we're all enough intelligent here to understand you are
> not representative of Ireland, but actually you're representative of the
> planet of apes. Why Dr. Zira let you out, I wonder...
Actually Dr. Zira kept humans, so your metaphor/insult is complete
shit.
This is quite simple, if I call you an Italian shithead, Italian
dumbass, Italian toiletstain, do you really think I'm not insulting
Italy and Italians?
> > I can outsmart people by making a fool of myself?
>
> Yes, if there were to be such a nice competition, definitely.That's your
> only option to outsmart someone at something.
You've lost yourself in your own shit talk there.
> No, sorry I only take part in competitions about who's the smartest.
Wow, you must be so smart, because you, ya know, said so.
> Not really. You just proved once again what a stupid motherfucker you are,
> after not getting even the most obvious pun and insults. You're so dumb
> that, if we didn't have a nice auditorium here, it would be useless
> insulting you.
I'm a "stupid motherfucker" because you said I can outsmart people by
making a fool of myself? So even when I'm making a fool of myself, I'm
outsmarting you? Now that makes sense.
> I can go on and humiliate you forever, you know it and everybody here does
> about my endurance at that... The question is: can you bare it, Tool? :-)
Oh, yeah, I feel so humiliated by a guy who says he's being outsmarted
by a guy who's apparently making a fool of himself.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/22/2009 11:18:18 AM
|
|
On May 22, 5:52=A0am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> Ok, then sell it! I am sure there will be other people *really* intereste=
d
> in getting it, and you can actually make a lot of money out of a "piece o=
f
> crap" - that doesn't really happen everyday, no? It's a win-win situation=
..
Gee, isn't it funny how when someone else says the same thing I do he
gets "good luck" while I get your hilarious attempts at put downs? At
least you're admitting it's not the facts you're arguing, you
subjective twatface.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/22/2009 11:20:22 AM
|
|
On May 22, 6:00 am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> No, no... That's (another) rough misunderstanding, Tool. I know what other
> people are saying about you...:-)))
Oh, and I give a fuck what other people are saying about me. Do they
validate your existence for you?
> No, one guy actually told me on Yahoo Messenger: "that dude is so full of
> piss and shit, let him speak and he'll bury himself". He knows who he is
> :-))
Colour me not giving a shit what your Yahoo Messenger buddies think.
> And, of course, I never said the C65 is as historically important as the
> ENIAC. I said the C65 is part of computing history just as the ENIAC, the
> Sinclair Spectrum or the Difference Engine are. I know, you can't tell nor
> grasp the subtle difference, but it's not my fault you were born retarded.
That's great, so your real point was "every computer is part of
computing history". That is sooo profound, but it doesn't tell us
anything about why the C65 is so great, does it.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/22/2009 11:23:48 AM
|
|
On May 22, 6:16 am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> Here we are in a Commodore related channel, just in case you forgot it, and
> I think even the utmost retarded fool would realize the opinion of the
> average Joe here is biased, when it comes about the importance of Commodore
> computers. Unfortunately you don't realize that. But generally, the C65 is
> pretty important, because it's the last 8-bit machine produced by Commodore,
> which is a very important brand in computer history, mainly because of the
> C64, but also because of the 6502. How does it all compare to the ENIAC? It
> doesn't directly, but it's a piece of computer history as the ENIAC is. I
> haven't ever gone further than that, and even if you desperately try to read
> things I didn't write, that trick is not going to work, Tool.
Dick Rubbin, my shitty TI calculator is a piece of computer history.
So is the computer that controls the automatic flusher in the toilet.
Here's what you said, you know, that stream of dogshit that comes from
your head:
On May 20, 1:14 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> It's your opinion, which I personally found completely laughable. Following
> your logic, the ENIAC is probably a worthless piece of trash as well. Maybe
> Babbage's Difference Engine is crap too, because it has no software. But
> again, hey, it's your opinion.
So you did compare the C65s importance to that of ENIAC and the
Difference Engine. Sorry, loser Dick, you lose.
> Yes, I can see infinite possibilities in every situation, but I understand
> the only thing you manage to see in every situation is how to fuck things
> up. Not everybody here is a loser like you, Tool, and you can't pretend us
> to be losers so that you'd feel less of a loser yourself.
Dick Rubbing, why do you insist on saying "we" and "us" all the time?
Anybody who wanted to would easily send a mail in support. So far we
have Sam somewhat for and Clocky and Dragos somewhat against you. Do
the maths since you've already told us how smart you are.
> > You're using "crap" and "useless" interchangeably there but thankfully
> > everybody can see that as we're adults.
>
> I strongly doubt you're an adult in the strict meaning of the word.
The muse you are successfully summoning for these insults is called
"lameass".
> What are you scared of? C= lovers are already laughing their asses off as I
> rip you a new asshole, you are the only one who can't see this. I don't need
> to do any recruitment, this is not the military, this is a fucking Commodore
> newsgroup, Tool.
Dickrub, C= lovers have been laughing their asses off for years at
you, and not just on usenet.
> I just asked, because you are so clearly uneducated it is obvious you know
> shit about computing and computing history.
Well done. You've admitted it was a dumbfuck question. Next.
> Well, some women called my manhood "third foot" before
Oh FFS, we've already been through that joke. Rent a writer.
> Yeah! It's cool how I make a complete fool out of yourself everytime, huh?
> Thanks, Tool.
Dickrub, that crappy feeling you're getting in your stomach is called
futile anger, as you watch all your worthless aggressive bullshit get
destroyed.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/22/2009 11:36:37 AM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:62eb9546-0fdc-49e9-b03f-4f157ade0e71@k2g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
> Dick Rubbin, my shitty TI calculator is a piece of computer history.
It is, Tool.
> So is the computer that controls the automatic flusher in the toilet.
Probably, in a way it is, Tool.
> Here's what you said, you know, that stream of dogshit that comes from
> your head:
>
> On May 20, 1:14 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> It's your opinion, which I personally found completely laughable.
>> Following
>> your logic, the ENIAC is probably a worthless piece of trash as well.
>> Maybe
>> Babbage's Difference Engine is crap too, because it has no software. But
>> again, hey, it's your opinion.
>
> So you did compare the C65s importance to that of ENIAC and the
> Difference Engine. Sorry, loser Dick, you lose.
No, I just underlined how the vacuum in your skull gave stimulus to another
anal birth of yours, when you boldly stated that "a computer with no
software is useless". I don't need to comment that statement anymore
because, given the inner stupidity of such blatant affirmation, that already
buries your rotting carcass alone, putting a nice "Moron" tag on your grave.
>> Yes, I can see infinite possibilities in every situation, but I
>> understand
>> the only thing you manage to see in every situation is how to fuck things
>> up. Not everybody here is a loser like you, Tool, and you can't pretend
>> us
>> to be losers so that you'd feel less of a loser yourself.
>
> Dick Rubbing, why do you insist on saying "we" and "us" all the time?
Sorry, because I have a lot of supporters and friends who are laughing at
you. Also, because you are not only talking to me, because that would be
private email, but to a whole newsgroup, you are lecturing a whole audience
with your asinine comments pulled out your broken ass. I understand you
don't get the difference between usenet and private mail, you're clearly too
stupid for that.
> Anybody who wanted to would easily send a mail in support. So far we
> have Sam somewhat for and Clocky and Dragos somewhat against you. Do
> the maths since you've already told us how smart you are.
>
>> > You're using "crap" and "useless" interchangeably there but thankfully
>> > everybody can see that as we're adults.
>>
>> I strongly doubt you're an adult in the strict meaning of the word.
>
> The muse you are successfully summoning for these insults is called
> "lameass".
This is not an insult, this is a legit doubt I have. The muse you are
summoning instead has no name, it's just your ass. That's where your
trainwreck of thoughts comes from.
>> What are you scared of? C= lovers are already laughing their asses off as
>> I
>> rip you a new asshole, you are the only one who can't see this. I don't
>> need
>> to do any recruitment, this is not the military, this is a fucking
>> Commodore
>> newsgroup, Tool.
>
> Dickrub, C= lovers have been laughing their asses off for years at
> you, and not just on usenet.
"Laughing at me? No! Laughing at you!". Come on, kindergarten time is over,
Tool, don't tell me you are also gonna cry now?
>> I just asked, because you are so clearly uneducated it is obvious you
>> know
>> shit about computing and computing history.
>
> Well done. You've admitted it was a dumbfuck question. Next.
"There are no stupid questions, only stupid answers..." said Oscar Wilde -
wait, since he was gay he was also killing babies so he should be torched,
huh, pro-life loser?
>> Well, some women called my manhood "third foot" before
>
> Oh FFS, we've already been through that joke. Rent a writer.
When? Rent a monkey to do a google search for you and prove it. Otherwise,
shut up, little shit.
>> Yeah! It's cool how I make a complete fool out of yourself everytime,
>> huh?
>> Thanks, Tool.
>
> Dickrub, that crappy feeling you're getting in your stomach is called
> futile anger, as you watch all your worthless aggressive bullshit get
> destroyed.
The only thing getting destroyed is your feeble good reputation based on
your obscurity. Everyone is looking at you now for the dumb, pitiful,
jealous loser with no brain you sadly are...And you did it all by yourself,
Tool :-)
Next...
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/22/2009 3:48:13 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:64a8e9fe-8722-4cae-b9a6-bb4a247bf748@y7g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> On May 22, 5:42 am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> Actually, if we were to look at you as the ideal Irish guy, all you've
>> shown
>> so far is the average mick is a fucking tool and lives up to the worst
>> stereotypes; anyway, we're all enough intelligent here to understand you
>> are
>> not representative of Ireland, but actually you're representative of the
>> planet of apes. Why Dr. Zira let you out, I wonder...
>
> Actually Dr. Zira kept humans, so your metaphor/insult is complete
> shit.
> This is quite simple, if I call you an Italian shithead, Italian
> dumbass, Italian toiletstain, do you really think I'm not insulting
> Italy and Italians?
LOL... Poor illogical dimwit...When Stallone said "The Italian Stallion" in
his Rocky movies, he was supposed to make a compliment to all Italians? You
are so illogical it's astonishing. You are one poor bastard twat :-))
>> > I can outsmart people by making a fool of myself?
>>
>> Yes, if there were to be such a nice competition, definitely.That's your
>> only option to outsmart someone at something.
>
> You've lost yourself in your own shit talk there.
You've lost yourself in a pit latrine way before, probably at birth, but I
assure you many others got the meaning of this sentence fully and laughed
hard :-)
>> No, sorry I only take part in competitions about who's the smartest.
>
> Wow, you must be so smart, because you, ya know, said so.
Weak, 2nd grade reply. Next.
>> Not really. You just proved once again what a stupid motherfucker you
>> are,
>> after not getting even the most obvious pun and insults. You're so dumb
>> that, if we didn't have a nice auditorium here, it would be useless
>> insulting you.
>
> I'm a "stupid motherfucker" because you said I can outsmart people by
> making a fool of myself?
No, you're a stupid motherfucker because you are stupid, dumb, moronic and
aggressive as one who fucks his own mother ( motherfucker ). Get it?
>So even when I'm making a fool of myself, I'm outsmarting you? Now that
>makes sense.
Not really, when you make a fool of yourself you're outsmarting other fools
we got around. There are many, but you take the cake.
>> I can go on and humiliate you forever, you know it and everybody here
>> does
>> about my endurance at that... The question is: can you bare it, Tool? :-)
>
> Oh, yeah, I feel so humiliated by a guy who says he's being outsmarted
> by a guy who's apparently making a fool of himself.
Before feeling humiliated by me, you should feel humiliated by your own
stupidity. Why are you doing this to yourself, looking like a complete jerk
and bitching like some rejected lover, is beyond anyone's comprehension.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/22/2009 3:53:34 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:875f9445-e292-4615-b705-18d12c83f8ff@37g2000yqp.googlegroups.com...
On May 22, 5:52 am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> Ok, then sell it! I am sure there will be other people *really*
>> interested
>> in getting it, and you can actually make a lot of money out of a "piece
>> of
>> crap" - that doesn't really happen everyday, no? It's a win-win
>> situation.
>
>Gee, isn't it funny how when someone else says the same thing I do he
>gets "good luck" while I get your hilarious attempts at put downs? At
>least you're admitting it's not the facts you're arguing, you
>subjective twatface.
You are green jealous.
Get over it, Tool.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/22/2009 3:55:40 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:86d5113c-50af-4e46-b5e6-1631437df8bc@f19g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> On May 22, 6:00 am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> No, no... That's (another) rough misunderstanding, Tool. I know what
>> other
>> people are saying about you...:-)))
>
> Oh, and I give a fuck what other people are saying about me.
You sound a lot like Popeye, "I yam what I yam and that's all that I yam".
>> No, one guy actually told me on Yahoo Messenger: "that dude is so full of
>> piss and shit, let him speak and he'll bury himself". He knows who he is
>> :-))
>
> Colour me not giving a shit what your Yahoo Messenger buddies think.
Don't worry, that's perfectly fine with me and them, Tool. Nobody feels any
deprivation :-)
>> And, of course, I never said the C65 is as historically important as the
>> ENIAC. I said the C65 is part of computing history just as the ENIAC, the
>> Sinclair Spectrum or the Difference Engine are. I know, you can't tell
>> nor
>> grasp the subtle difference, but it's not my fault you were born
>> retarded.
>
> That's great, so your real point was "every computer is part of
> computing history". That is sooo profound, but it doesn't tell us
> anything about why the C65 is so great, does it.
I said many things about that, but still you don't listen. Use google to
find out why the C65 is great. Ask someone to help you with Google, maybe
your cat who surely is smarter than you, and check it out.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/22/2009 4:01:58 PM
|
|
"Sam Gillett" <sgillettnospam@diespammergte.net> wrote in message
news:7drRl.2830$5F2.1322@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
>
> "Groepaz" <groepaz@gmx.net> wrote ...
>
>> daniel.otoole@ucd.ie wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I've got a 15 inch penis but you
>>> don't see me mentioning that in connection to how useful any computer
>>> is.
>>
>> pics or it didnt happen !!!!!
>
> I suspect that he has centimeters confused with inches... :-)
The guy is a complete and utter tool. He actually has millimeters confused
with inches, most probably he's speaking about the wooden pole stuck up his
ass that derails the stream of shit he calls "thoughts".
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/22/2009 4:10:56 PM
|
|
On May 22, 4:55=A0pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> <daniel.oto...@ucd.ie> wrote in message
>
> news:875f9445-e292-4615-b705-18d12c83f8ff@37g2000yqp.googlegroups.com...
> On May 22, 5:52 am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>
> >> Ok, then sell it! I am sure there will be other people *really*
> >> interested
> >> in getting it, and you can actually make a lot of money out of a "piec=
e
> >> of
> >> crap" - that doesn't really happen everyday, no? It's a win-win
> >> situation.
>
> >Gee, isn't it funny how when someone else says the same thing I do he
> >gets "good luck" while I get your hilarious attempts at put downs? At
> >least you're admitting it's not the facts you're arguing, you
> >subjective twatface.
>
> You are green jealous.
>
> Get over it, Tool.
>
> Riccardo
Penis Rubber, you didn't actually answer anything there, you just did
your usual insulting lameness. No, I didn't expect you to notice.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/22/2009 4:26:20 PM
|
|
On May 22, 5:10=A0pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> "Sam Gillett" <sgillettnos...@diespammergte.net> wrote in message
>
> news:7drRl.2830$5F2.1322@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
>
>
>
> > "Groepaz" <groe...@gmx.net> wrote ...
>
> >> daniel.oto...@ucd.ie wrote:
>
> >>> I've got a 15 inch penis but you
> >>> don't see me mentioning that in connection to how useful any computer
> >>> is.
>
> >> pics or it didnt happen !!!!!
>
> > I suspect that he has centimeters confused with inches... =A0 =A0:-)
>
> The guy is a complete and utter tool. He actually has millimeters confuse=
d
> with inches, most probably he's speaking about the wooden pole stuck up h=
is
> ass that derails the stream of shit he calls "thoughts".
>
> Riccardo
Dickrub, I think you're confusing inches with metres. Man, that was
funny.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/22/2009 4:28:12 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:bb780021-1714-42c0-b5d4-cd26ba947d4c@d14g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
> > > I suspect that he has centimeters confused with inches... :-)
>>
>> The guy is a complete and utter tool. He actually has millimeters
>> confused
>> with inches, most probably he's speaking about the wooden pole stuck up
>> his
>> ass that derails the stream of shit he calls "thoughts".
>>
>> Riccardo
>
>Dickrub, I think you're confusing inches with metres. Man, that was
>funny.
So you got a 15 meters pole stuck up your ass. Wow, that's really something.
It should really hurt.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/22/2009 4:37:58 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:765600c3-151a-4203-aedc-4074e9d74015@h11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On May 22, 4:55 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> <daniel.oto...@ucd.ie> wrote in message
>
> news:875f9445-e292-4615-b705-18d12c83f8ff@37g2000yqp.googlegroups.com...
> On May 22, 5:52 am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>
> >> Ok, then sell it! I am sure there will be other people *really*
> >> interested
> >> in getting it, and you can actually make a lot of money out of a "piece
> >> of
> >> crap" - that doesn't really happen everyday, no? It's a win-win
> >> situation.
>
> >Gee, isn't it funny how when someone else says the same thing I do he
> >gets "good luck" while I get your hilarious attempts at put downs? At
> >least you're admitting it's not the facts you're arguing, you
> >subjective twatface.
>
> You are green jealous.
>
> Get over it, Tool.
>
> Riccardo
>
>Penis Rubber, you didn't actually answer anything there, you just did your
>usual insulting lameness. No, I didn't expect you to notice.
What am I supposed to answer, Tool? You act like a fruit, stir a shit here
like a jealous twat and still look for answers from me. You should get in
touch with a shrink and pretend answers from him, not from me.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/22/2009 4:43:43 PM
|
|
On May 22, 5:43=A0pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> What am I supposed to answer, Tool?
Well you could try saying something that isn't plain dogshit.
> You act like a fruit, stir a shit here
Stir the shit? Yet another one of your cloud cuckoo bullshit. I
already proved that my original post was about the C65. Your response
was about me. Sorry, you've 100% lost that one.
> like a jealous twat and still look for answers from me.
And yet the opposite has also been 100% proven by Dragos. He has one
and says there's no use for it. In fact, let's do some more maths, Mr
Self Proclaimed Smart Guy.
Real, non-fairytale people who whisper sweet nothings into your ear on
IM, who think the C65 overall isn't that important except as a sale on
ebay, who have posted in this thread:
Me
Dragos
Clocky
Dipshits who think everybody is jealous of them with no evidence to
show for that claim and who like to tell everybody how smart they are
and who say "Irish" 3 times but then pretend the word meant nothing,
who think the C65 is amazing because they could exploit the software
except they can't because they're too busy but all the same it's as
important as ENIAC and the Difference Engine
Dickrub.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/22/2009 8:11:48 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:983d54ae-fec1-4848-98ce-7099e0af8c9e@o18g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
On May 22, 5:43 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> What am I supposed to answer, Tool?
>
>Well you could try saying something that isn't plain dogshit.
Obviously I did, but listening is not what you had in mind. You were trying
to avenge another flame you lost sometime ago, dipshit. It was clear as the
sun.
>> You act like a fruit, stir a shit here
>
>Stir the shit? Yet another one of your cloud cuckoo bullshit. I
>already proved that my original post was about the C65.
Your original post was a broad statement about computers being useless
without software. Which is a laughable argument. Only an uneducated fool in
computing would state such a dumb, ridicoulous absolute theorem, which
sounds like a fart in an elevator.
>Your response was about me. Sorry, you've 100% lost that one.
My response was about your opinion, which is laughable and nobody disagreed
with me on that, have you noticed it?
>> like a jealous twat and still look for answers from me.
>
>And yet the opposite has also been 100% proven by Dragos. He has one
>and says there's no use for it. In fact, let's do some more maths, Mr
>Self Proclaimed Smart Guy.
I doubt Mark Gladson owns a C65. If he owns one, I'd like to know which
serial number is his or at least view a picture.
>Real, non-fairytale people who whisper sweet nothings into your ear on IM,
>who think the C65 overall isn't that important except as a sale on ebay,
>who have posted in this thread:
>Me
Aka the Tool
>Dragos
Aka the guy who allegedly owns one of these machines, says it's utter crap
but doesn't want to sell it - sounds fishy, doesn't it?
>Clocky
Clockmeister, aka Clocky, is a nice bloke and we have always, I said always,
got along great. He simply agreed with me the C65 retains its value as a
collectible item, rather than for the intrinsic value of the machine itself.
> Dipshits who think everybody is jealous of them with no evidence to
I don't think every dipshit out there is jealous. I think you're the only
jealous dipshit.
>show for that claim and who like to tell everybody how smart they are and
>who say "Irish" 3 times but then pretend the word meant nothing,
Irish, Irish, Irish. I said it three times, now does that translate as
jackass in English?
> who think the C65 is amazing because they could exploit the software
> except they can't because they're too busy but all the same it's as
> important as ENIAC and the Difference Engine >Dickrub.
The C65 is amazing as an 8-bit machine. I said, many times, and repeated
many times, the C65 is not as important as the ENIAC, but it's part of
computing history just as the ENIAC or the Difference Engine are. I dare you
to quote a post o'mine where I say the C65 equals the ENIAC in importance;
you ain't gonna do it, because that never happened. You can keep on posting
your moronic and distorted view of reality, in the pathetic hope to save the
face but, once more, you just keep on making a complete fool out of
yourself, like the hopeless, stupid dimwit with no brains you are.
You know what? You kind of remind me those stubborn turds you keep flushing
away yet they keep on popping up in the bowl.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/22/2009 10:25:54 PM
|
|
"Riccardo Rubini" <rubini@despammed.com> wrote ...
>
> <daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
[snip]
I really do hate to interupt a flame war with an on topic post, but I will do
so anyway! :-)
Will the participants please turn off their flame-throwers for a moment to
give everyone a chance to read all about the C65 on the folliwing web page.
http://www.floodgap.com/retrobits/ckb/secret/65.html
Perhaps rational discussion will follow. Then again, maybe not.
Gentlemen, light your flamethrowers again. Shake hands and return to your
respective corners. Then come out spewing insults again.
--
Best regards,
Sam Gillett
Change is inevitable,
except from vending machines!
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Sam
|
5/23/2009 4:09:48 AM
|
|
"Sam Gillett" <sgillettnospam@diespammergte.net> wrote in message
news:gGKRl.184$9L2.90@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
> Will the participants please turn off their flame-throwers for a moment to
> give everyone a chance to read all about the C65 on the folliwing web
> page.
>
> http://www.floodgap.com/retrobits/ckb/secret/65.html
Sam, I know Cameron's page pretty well, as I have also contributed a little
to it. IIRC, I gave Cameron a picture of my RAM board.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/23/2009 7:34:19 AM
|
|
On May 23, 12:09=A0am, "Sam Gillett" <sgillettnos...@diespammergte.net>
wrote:
> [snip]
> I really do hate to interupt a flame war with an on topic post, but I wil=
l do
> so anyway! =A0 =A0:-)
>
> Will the participants please turn off their flame-throwers for a moment t=
o
> give everyone a chance to read all about the C65 on the folliwing web pag=
e.
>
> http://www.floodgap.com/retrobits/ckb/secret/65.html
Speaking of interruption - earlier on in this thread, I was interested
in looking at the MESS emulation of the C65. I found the ROMs and
booted it up in MESS, but never got past a solid blue/turquoise
screen. I know some untoward things were said here about the MESS
implementation here, but should I expect it to get any further than I
did?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
schmidtd
|
5/23/2009 11:22:29 AM
|
|
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
--1749432381-1153932470-1243078647=:24682
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
On Sat, 23 May 2009, schmidtd wrote:
> On May 23, 12:09=C2=A0am, "Sam Gillett" <sgillettnos...@diespammergte.net=
>
> wrote:
>> [snip]
>> I really do hate to interupt a flame war with an on topic post, but I wi=
ll do
>> so anyway! =C2=A0 =C2=A0:-)
>>
>> Will the participants please turn off their flame-throwers for a moment =
to
>> give everyone a chance to read all about the C65 on the folliwing web pa=
ge.
>>
>> http://www.floodgap.com/retrobits/ckb/secret/65.html
>
> Speaking of interruption - earlier on in this thread, I was interested
> in looking at the MESS emulation of the C65. I found the ROMs and
> booted it up in MESS, but never got past a solid blue/turquoise
> screen. I know some untoward things were said here about the MESS
> implementation here, but should I expect it to get any further than I
> did?
>
I've been able to get the BASIC 10 boot prompt on most of the 65 firmwares=
=20
MESS supported, though that was years ago.
-uso.
--1749432381-1153932470-1243078647=:24682--
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
lyricalnanoha
|
5/23/2009 11:37:26 AM
|
|
On May 22, 11:25=A0pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> Obviously I did, but listening is not what you had in mind. You were tryi=
ng
> to avenge another flame you lost sometime ago, dipshit. It was clear as t=
he
> sun.
If you look at the sun how long can you see for exactly?
You no doubt find your own stream of futile old hat insults hilarious,
but out here in the real world everybody knows you just do that as a
substitute for rational dialogue, which you're incapable of as you are
a Dick(rubbin)head.
Which is precisely why I quit our last flaming session, You're heavy
on the insult, but light, or more accurately, zero on the sense.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/23/2009 11:46:41 AM
|
|
On May 22, 11:25=A0pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> Clockmeister, aka Clocky, is a nice bloke and we have always, I said alwa=
ys,
> got along great. He simply agreed with me the C65 retains its value as a
> collectible item, rather than for the intrinsic value of the machine itse=
lf.
He agreed with you that the C65 can be sold for a lot of money? Now
who the fuck exactly DIDN'T agree with that? Everyone can see you're
changing the point here you sneaky slimy Italian cheating lying
shitbag loser.
> > Dipshits who think everybody is jealous of them with no evidence to
>
> I don't think every dipshit out there is jealous. I think you're the only
> jealous dipshit.
And still no evidence. Well done on that. Nobody will notice I swear.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/23/2009 11:58:53 AM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:4c2c893f-fa7d-4767-9670-6f09f089bf23@g1g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On May 22, 11:25 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> Obviously I did, but listening is not what you had in mind. You were
>> trying
>> to avenge another flame you lost sometime ago, dipshit. It was clear as
>> the
>> sun.
>
>If you look at the sun how long can you see for exactly?
"As clear as the sun" is an idiomatic sentence, but you're clearly too
stupid and to ignorant to even know idiomatic sentences in your own
language.
>You no doubt find your own stream of futile old hat insults hilarious,
And I am not the only one who does, I want that to be clear to you, just so
that you are aware there are quite some people laughing at your back.
> but out here in the real world everybody knows you just do that as a
> substitute for rational dialogue, which you're incapable of as you are
> a Dick(rubbin)head.
When you're done whining because you've been spanked like a little twat,
maybe the group can move on to other topics or discuss the C65 topic without
your useless presence.
> Which is precisely why I quit our last flaming session, You're heavy on
> the insult, but light, or more accurately, zero on the sense.
Sour grapes once again, Tool. You'd wish you'd make as much as sense as I
do, expecially when I prove you're a fucking, hopeless, Tool.
Now fuck off back in the Irish countryside, playing with cow shit and the
likes. In the bullshit department you're second to none.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/23/2009 12:26:12 PM
|
|
On May 22, 11:25 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> My response was about your opinion, which is laughable and nobody disagreed
> with me on that, have you noticed it?
If your comedy was intentional you could do stand up. You think the
world agrees with you because "nobody disagreed" with you? How many
*agreed with you and said so*? How many *disagreed* with your opinion
of the historical importance of the C65? Go on, ignore the question
you chickenshit Italian coward. I won't and I've already given you the
count.
Also you were the first one to start the name distortions, which is
pretty fucking stupid when your name is Dick Rubbing.
> Irish, Irish, Irish. I said it three times, now does that translate as
> jackass in English?
Well why do you use the word so many times then? I'll take it then
that all the times you say you are smart or not a fucking asshole
you're not really saying anything at all either.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/23/2009 12:27:52 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:056ce7f2-cec1-42be-8e53-4c70b5840fef@f19g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
>He agreed with you that the C65 can be sold for a lot of money?
I agreed money is in the collectible value of the item, Tool. Can you just
read English, for fuck's sake? Maybe you're even more stupid than
everybody's here already thinks.
>Everyone can see you're changing the point here you sneaky slimy Italian
>cheating lying
>shitbag loser
Me changing the point? LOL, you're the pot calling the kettle black here.
Now I understand why Ireland has the lowest IQ average in Europe(*): it's
your negative value that brings down a whole nation.
>> I don't think every dipshit out there is jealous. I think you're the only
>> jealous dipshit.
>
>And still no evidence. Well done on that. Nobody will notice I swear.
You are the living evidence of your own jealousy and stupidity, Tool.
Riccardo
(*) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ_and_the_Wealth_of_Nations
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/23/2009 12:32:28 PM
|
|
"Riccardo Rubini" <rubini@despammed.com> wrote in message
news:4a17eb69$0$47552$4fafbaef@reader1.news.tin.it...
>
> <daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
> news:4c2c893f-fa7d-4767-9670-6f09f089bf23@g1g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> On May 22, 11:25 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>>> Obviously I did, but listening is not what you had in mind. You were
>>> trying
>>> to avenge another flame you lost sometime ago, dipshit. It was clear as
>>> the
>>> sun.
>>
>>If you look at the sun how long can you see for exactly?
>
> "As clear as the sun" is an idiomatic sentence, but you're clearly too
> stupid and to ignorant to even know idiomatic sentences in your own
> language.
>
>>You no doubt find your own stream of futile old hat insults hilarious,
>
> And I am not the only one who does, I want that to be clear to you, just
> so that you are aware there are quite some people laughing at your back.
>
>> but out here in the real world everybody knows you just do that as a
>> substitute for rational dialogue, which you're incapable of as you are
>> a Dick(rubbin)head.
>
> When you're done whining because you've been spanked like a little twat,
> maybe the group can move on to other topics or discuss the C65 topic
> without your useless presence.
>
>> Which is precisely why I quit our last flaming session, You're heavy on
>> the insult, but light, or more accurately, zero on the sense.
>
> Sour grapes once again, Tool. You'd wish you'd make as much as sense as I
> do, expecially when I prove you're a fucking, hopeless, Tool.
>
> Now fuck off back in the Irish countryside, playing with cow shit and the
> likes. In the bullshit department you're second to none.
>
> Riccardo
>
>
You`s are the best of friends..right?
Just bridging the gap between brothers?
All good here.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
me
|
5/23/2009 12:36:09 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:8f2b2c2c-35f6-42b9-b0b0-4b3cc020fd76@e21g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> On May 22, 11:25 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> My response was about your opinion, which is laughable and nobody
>> disagreed
>> with me on that, have you noticed it?
>
> If your comedy was intentional you could do stand up. You think the
> world agrees with you because "nobody disagreed" with you?
Yes, it's called "consent by silent" or "silent consent", Tool. It's
hilarious you've never ever heard about that, but it's the Romans who
probably first brought it in writing, about 2000 years ago, when your
ancestors were still painting their faces and jumping around a fire, Tool.
>> Irish, Irish, Irish. I said it three times, now does that translate as
>> jackass in English?
>
> Well why do you use the word so many times then? I'll take it then
> that all the times you say you are smart or not a fucking asshole
> you're not really saying anything at all either.
Shut up, Tool. You're done, over and out. And that was a couple of days ago
already.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/23/2009 12:37:05 PM
|
|
"schmidtd" <schmidtd@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:3de0703d-e91e-42af-ad30-e85ff93f83d1@j32g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
>Speaking of interruption - earlier on in this thread, I was interested
>in looking at the MESS emulation of the C65. I found the ROMs and
>booted it up in MESS, but never got past a solid blue/turquoise
>screen. I know some untoward things were said here about the MESS
>implementation here, but should I expect it to get any further than I
>did?
The MESS emulation is not very good, but consider that the earlier ROMs were
very buggy, so I would suggest you to use the last ones that were made
available to the public, and that were shipped with Rev 4 and Rev 5 ROMs.
These are 911001 and 910828.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/23/2009 12:39:17 PM
|
|
On May 23, 1:32 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> I agreed money is in the collectible value of the item, Tool. Can you just
> read English, for fuck's sake? Maybe you're even more stupid than
> everybody's here already thinks.
Nobody ever disagreed with that Rubber Dick. Who agreed with you about
how important and fantastic the C65 is except for selling on? Go on,
list them or STFU.
> >Everyone can see you're changing the point here you sneaky slimy Italian
> >cheating lying
> >shitbag loser
>
> Me changing the point? LOL, you're the pot calling the kettle black here.
> Now I understand why Ireland has the lowest IQ average in Europe(*): it's
> your negative value that brings down a whole nation.
That isn't even Wikipedia standard data, it's a Wikipedia page about a
book that pretty much everybody on earth thinks is bullshit (except
you). And even if those averages are true, the fact that you don't
even know Greece and Croatia are in Europe separates you out as an
utter dumbfuck retard no matter what shithole you're from.
>
> >> I don't think every dipshit out there is jealous. I think you're the only
> >> jealous dipshit.
>
> >And still no evidence. Well done on that. Nobody will notice I swear.
>
> You are the living evidence of your own jealousy and stupidity, Tool.
Oh, it's "self evident"? Pretending that's evidence to back up your
pathetic claims doesn't make you look like a stupid fucking
shitDickRub I swear.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/23/2009 12:50:37 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:14b56989-3184-4ec4-b581-34977952b6cd@x5g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> On May 23, 1:32 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> I agreed money is in the collectible value of the item, Tool. Can you
>> just
>> read English, for fuck's sake? Maybe you're even more stupid than
>> everybody's here already thinks.
>
> Nobody ever disagreed with that Rubber Dick. Who agreed with you about
> how important and fantastic the C65 is except for selling on? Go on,
> list them or STFU.
Everyone who has not said anything about it has implicitly agreed, Tool. I
don't think anyone feels intimidated to speak their mind and if they don't,
probably they have nothing bad to say about this computer. Unfortunately,
reality is, there are not many C65's out there, currently I am the only
owner around in here, the one who's getting all your sour grapes venom -
Dragos brought no evidence he really owns one, and I am quite sure he
doesn't - so we really lack the people who can step in because they own a
C65 and tell their experiences or tell how great it is. Anyway, the fact
alone there are hundreds of pages on the Internet on this topic, and each
says basically it's an amazing computer, that proves alone there's big
interest over this machine and a lot of respect for its specs and, yeah, for
what it could have been. When you browse the web, you don't get that many
pages on Danny O'Toole, because, contrary to the C65, he's just a shit, a
little shit none gives a flying fuck about.
>> >Everyone can see you're changing the point here you sneaky slimy Italian
>> >cheating lying
>> >shitbag loser
>>
>> Me changing the point? LOL, you're the pot calling the kettle black here.
>> Now I understand why Ireland has the lowest IQ average in Europe(*): it's
>> your negative value that brings down a whole nation.
>
> That isn't even Wikipedia standard data, it's a Wikipedia page about a
> book that pretty much everybody on earth thinks is bullshit (except
> you).
Probably the micks do, the rest of the World is pretty content about it.
> And even if those averages are true, the fact that you don't
> even know Greece and Croatia are in Europe separates you out as an
> utter dumbfuck retard no matter what shithole you're from.
Huh, sorry, I should have said it better: I forgot to say Ireland, whose
average I.Q. is listed at 93, has the fourth highest per capita of any
country in the world (after Luxembourg, Norway and the United States), yet
it is the only nation in Europe to break the GDP/IQ rule. It's the single
striking exception in Europe and the lowest score among rich countries.
Greece and Croatia rank lower, but they are relatively poor countries.
>>
>> >> I don't think every dipshit out there is jealous. I think you're the
>> >> only
>> >> jealous dipshit.
>>
>> >And still no evidence. Well done on that. Nobody will notice I swear.
>>
>> You are the living evidence of your own jealousy and stupidity, Tool.
>
> Oh, it's "self evident"? Pretending that's evidence to back up your
> pathetic claims doesn't make you look like a stupid fucking
> shitDickRub I swear.
I said you are the most striking evidence of your own idiocy and you just
proved once again I wasn't wrong.
Do you still have it, rabid Irishman? I can go on forever, you know...
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/23/2009 1:11:26 PM
|
|
On May 23, 1:26 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> "As clear as the sun" is an idiomatic sentence, but you're clearly too
> stupid and to ignorant to even know idiomatic sentences in your own
> language.
Maybe 200 years ago pal. I've never heard ANYBODY use that phrase. Is
that why your English is so shit?
> And I am not the only one who does, I want that to be clear to you, just so
> that you are aware there are quite some people laughing at your back.
Whoppee fuckin' do. If your magical fairy friends like to whisper
sweet nothings in your ear while you cry yourself to sleep after
another buttfucking humiliation that's up to them.
> When you're done whining because you've been spanked like a little twat,
> maybe the group can move on to other topics or discuss the C65 topic without
> your useless presence.
Well we can't actually, because any opinion that you don't like you'll
dump your boring insult shit on without even addressing the point.
> Sour grapes once again, Tool. You'd wish you'd make as much as sense as I
> do, expecially when I prove you're a fucking, hopeless, Tool.
Oh fuck off. No evidence yet again. Why don't you start your next post
with "My name is Rubber Dick and I still don't have any evidence to
prove my claims, but here's more total bullshit". At least it'd be
honest.
> Now fuck off back in the Irish countryside, playing with cow shit and the
> likes. In the bullshit department you're second to none.
WTF? It's displays of utter dumbfuck ignorance like that that make you
the chump you are. What makes you think Ireland has any more
countryside or cows than Italy or that I live in the country? Oh, your
utter Dickheaded stupidity, that'd be it.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/23/2009 1:36:43 PM
|
|
On May 23, 1:37 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> Yes, it's called "consent by silent" or "silent consent", Tool. It's
> hilarious you've never ever heard about that, but it's the Romans who
> probably first brought it in writing, about 2000 years ago, when your
> ancestors were still painting their faces and jumping around a fire, Tool.
Yeah, but I have all the "silent consent" plus the people who could be
bothered to actually express an opinion ON MY SIDE.
And who gives a fuck about the Romans. They haven't stopped your
country RIGHT NOW being a shithole toilet dump in comparison to where
I live.
> Shut up, Tool. You're done, over and out. And that was a couple of days ago
> already.
Yawn.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/23/2009 1:41:55 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:8cb1695d-f444-44ce-84f9-bf5567e57e8e@j32g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> On May 23, 1:26 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> "As clear as the sun" is an idiomatic sentence, but you're clearly too
>> stupid and to ignorant to even know idiomatic sentences in your own
>> language.
>
> Maybe 200 years ago pal. I've never heard ANYBODY use that phrase. Is
> that why your English is so shit?
>
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22as+clear+as+the+sun%22&aq=f&oq=&aqi=g1
No, because *your* English is so shit and you're one sorry uneducated mick
:-)
46,500 hits with that saying, Irish ignorant dumb fuck.
>> And I am not the only one who does, I want that to be clear to you, just
>> so
>> that you are aware there are quite some people laughing at your back.
>
> Whoppee fuckin' do. If your magical fairy friends like to whisper
> sweet nothings in your ear while you cry yourself to sleep after
> another buttfucking humiliation that's up to them.
They don't whisper sweet nothings, they whisper sweet laughs at an ignorant
mick who thinks he is anyhow relevant or winning his war of words he's
getting buried under :-)))
>> When you're done whining because you've been spanked like a little twat,
>> maybe the group can move on to other topics or discuss the C65 topic
>> without
>> your useless presence.
>
> Well we can't actually, because any opinion that you don't like you'll
> dump your boring insult shit on without even addressing the point.
Why you're the only one who has been "insulted" in this whole thread? I have
not insulted anyone else but you, and anyone can see this, though you've
insulted everybody's intelligence with your utter ignorance and stupidity.
Also, just because your oversized ego is so sore, you're insulting
everybody's patience going on with your useless and personal crusuade
against me, when all the others just laugh at you or don't give a fuck
about.
I don't know how to tell you you're a fucking tool, Tool, without you
refusing this truth on the grounds it's me telling you that; be objective
with yourself, do you really believe you're the smart one here, getting
humiliated and still returning to the thread desperately trying to save the
face you've lost days ago?
No matter how much you try to twist my words, everyone can see I did say
nothing wrong about the C65, and I did offend anyone but you. Is it just a
case you're the only one covered in shit here? Is it because you're a
fucking Tool? Think about it. Take some time, because, given your low IQ as
an Irishman you need some more time ;-)
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/23/2009 1:55:38 PM
|
|
On May 23, 2:11 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> Everyone who has not said anything about it has implicitly agreed
Great theory. Pity the only people who actually expressed an opinion
don't agree with you huh? Thankfully you have all the magical
fairyland silent majority on your side.
> When you browse the web, you don't get that many
> pages on Danny O'Toole, because, contrary to the C65, he's just a shit, a
> little shit none gives a flying fuck about.
I'd get more pages about shit on the web than about the C65 too. That
gurgling sound was your theory that came out your ass anyway being
flushed away.
> Probably the micks do, the rest of the World is pretty content about it.
Even on that wikipedia page they're not Rubber Dick, but you're really
smart because you said so and your English is great because you passed
a test, so you knew that, right? You still can't even understand that
page isn't even Wikipedia data, it's just the crap taken from a book
that everyone thinks is shit.
> Huh, sorry, I should have said it better: I forgot to say Ireland, whose
> average I.Q. is listed at 93, has the fourth highest per capita of any
> country in the world (after Luxembourg, Norway and the United States), yet
> it is the only nation in Europe to break the GDP/IQ rule. It's the single
> striking exception in Europe and the lowest score among rich countries.
> Greece and Croatia rank lower, but they are relatively poor countries.
The English got really good there, must be a cut and paste, huh?
Like I've said before, we're doing pretty alright here it seems aren't
we? That data has a reference. Care to show me where the IQ data on
that page came from? No, because you're full of shit just like them.
> I said you are the most striking evidence of your own idiocy and you just
> proved once again I wasn't wrong.
Yadda yadda, no actual evidence only bullshit. We heard you the first
time.
> Do you still have it, rabid Irishman? I can go on forever, you know...
Yes, but it'll all be fuck ups, like your fuck up with that already
shit wikipedia page. Did you do Geography in genius school Dick Rub?
Where are Croatia and Greece again? You twat.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/23/2009 1:56:07 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:edac7fb5-d02a-4c31-bc96-5b45db6bb49d@y7g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> On May 23, 1:37 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> Yes, it's called "consent by silent" or "silent consent", Tool. It's
>> hilarious you've never ever heard about that, but it's the Romans who
>> probably first brought it in writing, about 2000 years ago, when your
>> ancestors were still painting their faces and jumping around a fire,
>> Tool.
>
> Yeah, but I have all the "silent consent" plus the people who could be
> bothered to actually express an opinion ON MY SIDE.
You always ask others evidence for their claims. Then where is the evidence
there is one single another tool, other than you, siding with you? All you
got in this thread are insults and people laughing at you measuring your
dick and claiming it's 40 centimeters. Stick it up your ass then, maybe
you'll find some pleasure and quit acting like an hysterical queer.
> And who gives a fuck about the Romans. They haven't stopped your
> country RIGHT NOW being a shithole toilet dump in comparison to where
> I live.
>
>> Shut up, Tool. You're done, over and out. And that was a couple of days
>> ago
>> already.
>
> Yawn.
Yep, that's what people say while reading your foolish drivel. You don't
even match the wit and intelligence of a fart coming out of a constipated
cow.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/23/2009 2:00:00 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:0de35b1b-1d34-4811-a7bd-4efb29270fc9@z5g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> On May 23, 2:11 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> Everyone who has not said anything about it has implicitly agreed
>
> Great theory. Pity the only people who actually expressed an opinion
> don't agree with you huh? Thankfully you have all the magical
> fairyland silent majority on your side.
>
>
>> When you browse the web, you don't get that many
>> pages on Danny O'Toole, because, contrary to the C65, he's just a shit, a
>> little shit none gives a flying fuck about.
>
> I'd get more pages about shit on the web than about the C65 too. That
> gurgling sound was your theory that came out your ass anyway being
> flushed away.
Tool, face it, your persona is actually less relevant than a C65. Nobody
gives a fuck about you.
[about the micks' loq iq]
> Like I've said before, we're doing pretty alright here it seems aren't
> we?
Reading your drivel, no, you are doing very bad. You make your whole nation
look like a shitstain on a bull's ass. Probably England should hire you for
reverse propaganda, when there are those bouts about Northern Ireland. "See
how southern Irish are? You'd better stay with us". You might get a job.
>> Do you still have it, rabid Irishman? I can go on forever, you know...
>
> Yes, but it'll all be fuck ups, like your fuck up with that already
> shit wikipedia page. Did you do Geography in genius school Dick Rub?
> Where are Croatia and Greece again? You twat.
Croatia and Greece are in a respectable place where there are not so many
Commodore guys who embarass themselves as utter fools for the sake of it,
Tool. We can't say the same about Ireland anymore, since you stepped your
stinky foot in here.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/23/2009 2:05:23 PM
|
|
On May 23, 2:55 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> > Maybe 200 years ago pal. I've never heard ANYBODY use that phrase. Is
> > that why your English is so shit?
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22as+clear+as+the+sun%22&aq=f&o...
>
> No, because *your* English is so shit and you're one sorry uneducated mick
> :-)
>
> 46,500 hits with that saying, Irish ignorant dumb fuck.
So which book or album from those matches proves it's a current
English expression? You're using the number of hits on Google as
evidence? You're only kidding yourself. Try "as clear as day" and you
get a link straight to an idiomatic dictionary. You didn't even get
your 200 year old phrase right. Dig dig dig you asshole.
> They don't whisper sweet nothings, they whisper sweet laughs at an ignorant
> mick who thinks he is anyhow relevant or winning his war of words he's
> getting buried under :-)))
Boring. No-one gives a shit about your pixie lala land friends. And
even if they did exist, all that means is that you plus all your
friends together aren't worth shit as you're being made look a dick.
Oh, wait, you ARE a DICK.
> Why you're the only one who has been "insulted" in this whole thread? I have
> not insulted anyone else but you, and anyone can see this, though you've
> insulted everybody's intelligence with your utter ignorance and stupidity.
Because you're an asshole? I've no idea why crazy Italian Dickheads do
the stupid things they do. Who does?
> Also, just because your oversized ego is so sore, you're insulting
> everybody's patience going on with your useless and personal crusuade
> against me, when all the others just laugh at you or don't give a fuck
> about.
Er, I'm not sure what catalogue of psychological problems you have,
but all the imaginary friends in the universe don't seem to be saving
you from a buttfucking. In fact, the way you keep bringing them up is
contributing to the buttfucking but you're too stupid to notice.
> I don't know how to tell you you're a fucking tool, Tool, without you
> refusing this truth on the grounds it's me telling you that; be objective
> with yourself, do you really believe you're the smart one here, getting
> humiliated and still returning to the thread desperately trying to save the
> face you've lost days ago?
Rubber Dick, Dick Rubber. Yeah, you're real smart because you said so.
We get it. Everybody knows people who say they are smart are real
intelligent.
> No matter how much you try to twist my words, everyone can see I did say
> nothing wrong about the C65, and I did offend anyone but you. Is it just a
> case you're the only one covered in shit here? Is it because you're a
> fucking Tool? Think about it. Take some time, because, given your low IQ as
> an Irishman you need some more time ;-)
Haha, I've thought about it for less than a second and came to the
conclusion that your country is a useless cheapass poverty stricken
dump because you're alls o smart. Hahaha.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/23/2009 2:23:17 PM
|
|
On May 23, 3:00 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> You always ask others evidence for their claims. Then where is the evidence
> there is one single another tool, other than you, siding with you? All you
> got in this thread are insults and people laughing at you measuring your
> dick and claiming it's 40 centimeters. Stick it up your ass then, maybe
> you'll find some pleasure and quit acting like an hysterical queer.
Loud and clear DickRub. No evidence. Now I know you don't want to
scroll up, because you know you're getting a buttfucking that can only
get worse, but I already listed the guys who agree that that C65 isn't
historically important and isn't all that useful to own except as a
monetary investment. It's understandable that midway through the
buttfucking of your life you'd want to ignore that, but it's true all
the same.
> > Yawn.
>
> Yep, that's what people say while reading your foolish drivel. You don't
> even match the wit and intelligence of a fart coming out of a constipated
> cow.
You know, your English is actually getting better. Pity about all the
magical people talking in your head. If any of them have a fucking
clue how to hold a logical debate could you put them on the line
Rubber Dick?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/23/2009 2:29:33 PM
|
|
On May 23, 3:05=A0pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> Croatia and Greece are in a respectable place where there are not so many
> Commodore guys who embarass themselves as utter fools for the sake of it,
> Tool. We can't say the same about Ireland anymore, since you stepped your
> stinky foot in here.
Rubber Dick, since you think that wikipedia page is true, you're now
saying everybody in Croatia and Greece are idiots. So they're
respectable, but full of idiots?
Dig dig dig asshole Dick.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/23/2009 5:00:41 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:2211f414-ac43-45a3-a552-58a633e63e33@g19g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
> On May 23, 2:55 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> > Maybe 200 years ago pal. I've never heard ANYBODY use that phrase. Is
>> > that why your English is so shit?
>>
>> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22as+clear+as+the+sun%22&aq=f&o...
>>
>> No, because *your* English is so shit and you're one sorry uneducated
>> mick
>> :-)
>>
>> 46,500 hits with that saying, Irish ignorant dumb fuck.
>
> So which book or album from those matches proves it's a current
> English expression?
Learn to use Google and you'll find out, Tool. Even an amoeba would have
already found relevant links to that expression. But your low IQ is your
worst enemy.
>> They don't whisper sweet nothings, they whisper sweet laughs at an
>> ignorant
>> mick who thinks he is anyhow relevant or winning his war of words he's
>> getting buried under :-)))
>
> Boring. No-one gives a shit about your pixie lala land friends. And
> even if they did exist, all that means is that you plus all your
> friends together aren't worth shit as you're being made look a dick.
> Oh, wait, you ARE a DICK.
Chill, Tool. Go drink a glass of water and then come back.
>> Why you're the only one who has been "insulted" in this whole thread? I
>> have
>> not insulted anyone else but you, and anyone can see this, though you've
>> insulted everybody's intelligence with your utter ignorance and
>> stupidity.
>
> Because you're an asshole? I've no idea why crazy Italian Dickheads do
> the stupid things they do. Who does?
Probably people from countries with an higher IQ average ?
> Er, I'm not sure what catalogue of psychological problems you have,
> but all the imaginary friends in the universe don't seem to be saving
> you from a buttfucking. In fact, the way you keep bringing them up is
> contributing to the buttfucking but you're too stupid to notice.
You seem obsessed with sodomy as much as you're obsessed with measuring
dicks. I don't know why you decided to come out of the closet here in
comp.sys.cbm, but usually gay people do parades and stuff, why don't you
join one and get the fuck out of here, Tool?
>> I don't know how to tell you you're a fucking tool, Tool, without you
>> refusing this truth on the grounds it's me telling you that; be objective
>> with yourself, do you really believe you're the smart one here, getting
>> humiliated and still returning to the thread desperately trying to save
>> the
>> face you've lost days ago?
>
> Rubber Dick, Dick Rubber. Yeah, you're real smart because you said so.
> We get it. Everybody knows people who say they are smart are real
> intelligent.
Let the others be the judge, then. I have no problem with that. I know my
people, but unfortunately you haven't got any.
> Haha, I've thought about it for less than a second and came to the
> conclusion that your country is a useless cheapass poverty stricken
> dump because you're alls o smart. Hahaha.
Sour grapes, Tool. And very low IQ. This is the picture we're getting of
Ireland here, and I wonder if your connationals are actually proud the bad
publicity a dimwit like you is giving his own country.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/23/2009 5:50:58 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:d74a3135-ed25-4002-aeb7-a87ef3bef566@o18g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
>Rubber Dick, since you think that wikipedia page is true, you're now saying
>everybody in Croatia and Greece are idiots.
I am not saying anything, that book says so. I am surprised about Greece,
Croatia and Ireland having such low IQ averages, but to be honest, after
having dealt with you, I am not surprised anymore about Ireland and I start
to believe many stereotypes about "the mick" are actually very true, Tool
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/23/2009 5:54:33 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:146e7d72-777e-48c1-86c4-186bd3c0db38@d14g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
> On May 23, 3:00 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> You always ask others evidence for their claims. Then where is the
>> evidence
>> there is one single another tool, other than you, siding with you? All
>> you
>> got in this thread are insults and people laughing at you measuring your
>> dick and claiming it's 40 centimeters. Stick it up your ass then, maybe
>> you'll find some pleasure and quit acting like an hysterical queer.
>
> Loud and clear DickRub. No evidence.
No evidence?
"Groepaz" <groepaz@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:4a1545c2$0$32682$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net...
> pics or it didnt happen !!!!!
"Dombo" <dombo@disposable.invalid> wrote in message
news:4a1549bb$0$28138$5fc3050@news.tiscali.nl...
> Do you enjoy watching penises of other men?
>
> Fortunately comp.sys.cbm is text only.
"Sam Gillett" <sgillettnospam@diespammergte.net> wrote in message
news:7drRl.2830$5F2.1322@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
>I suspect that he has centimeters confused with inches... :-)
"Dombo" <dombo@disposable.invalid> wrote in message
news:4a1548e2$0$28138$5fc3050@news.tiscali.nl...
> Nor did you tell us how hard you had to work to be able to afford to get
> it enlarged, or were you already deformed at birth?
Tool, I guess these are mighty supporters of yours, right ? Guess whom were
they laughing at.
Now go hide in some pit latrine and do your usual sodomy tricks, you sick
Irish clown.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/23/2009 6:02:55 PM
|
|
On May 23, 7:02=A0pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> Tool, I guess these are mighty supporters of yours, right ? Guess whom we=
re
> they laughing at.
Haha, you stupid Rubber Dick asshole, those might be laughing at my 15
inches joke, but none of them give a shit about the fucking point that
you're so desperately trying to avoid: the C65 is pretty useless
except for its dollar value. In fact, the first two of those posts are
only having a laugh, not even at me, but you're too much of a dumb ass
Rubber Dick to tell the difference.
So, again, not that I think you've got the brains to ever understand
-> people who have posted here saying the C65 isn't a landmark or much
use: 3
-> assholes who want to avoid this issue entirely with smokescreen
bullshit: Dickrub.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/23/2009 6:20:28 PM
|
|
On May 23, 6:50 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> Learn to use Google and you'll find out, Tool. Even an amoeba would have
> already found relevant links to that expression. But your low IQ is your
> worst enemy.
You know, if you had a brain or a leg to stand on you would've just
told us which search match gave us a definition of the exact phrase
you used. You won't 'cos you can't 'cos you're a dumbass Dickhead.
> Chill, Tool. Go drink a glass of water and then come back.
FFS that was harsh. Not.
> > Because you're an asshole? I've no idea why crazy Italian Dickheads do
> > the stupid things they do. Who does?
>
> Probably people from countries with an higher IQ average ?
So people from countries with high average IQs know why crazy Italian
Dickheads do the stupid things they do? That's good to know. I guess
one of them might chip in their theory on you sometime then Rubber
Dick.
> You seem obsessed with sodomy as much as you're obsessed with measuring
> dicks. I don't know why you decided to come out of the closet here in
> comp.sys.cbm, but usually gay people do parades and stuff, why don't you
> join one and get the fuck out of here, Tool?
Buttfucked is a metaphor. Unless you are literally being buttfucked,
in which case enjoy! ;-)
> Let the others be the judge, then. I have no problem with that. I know my
> people, but unfortunately you haven't got any.
The magical fairy elf others who whisper their love in your IM ear?
Yeah, let them judge my ass. Their virtual fantasyland judgement
bothers me terribly Dickrub.
> Sour grapes, Tool. And very low IQ. This is the picture we're getting of
> Ireland here, and I wonder if your connationals are actually proud the bad
> publicity a dimwit like you is giving his own country.
The sour grapes line AGAIN? With no evidence AGAIN? Now I know you're
a dumbfuck Dick, but FFS this is the 6th or 7th time you've done that
and been made look a chump over it every time.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/23/2009 6:29:13 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:cd64dbc1-3b74-485a-b746-d8ab27b4e573@c9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> On May 23, 7:02 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> Tool, I guess these are mighty supporters of yours, right ? Guess whom
>> were
>> they laughing at.
>
> Haha, you stupid Rubber Dick asshole, those might be laughing at my 15
> inches joke, but none of them give a shit about the fucking point that
> you're so desperately trying to avoid: the C65 is pretty useless
> except for its dollar value. In fact, the first two of those posts are
> only having a laugh, not even at me, but you're too much of a dumb ass
> Rubber Dick to tell the difference.
> So, again, not that I think you've got the brains to ever understand
> -> people who have posted here saying the C65 isn't a landmark or much
> use: 3
> -> assholes who want to avoid this issue entirely with smokescreen
> bullshit: Dickrub.
He may have a life unlike your gay self!!
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
me
|
5/23/2009 6:34:50 PM
|
|
On May 23, 6:54 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> I am not saying anything, that book says so.
Aww, poor Dickrub. You sound like you're going to cry now. So are the
IQs in that book right or wrong? Come on then, you can't have it both
ways unless you're bisexual, can you?
> I am surprised about Greece,
> Croatia and Ireland having such low IQ averages, but to be honest, after
> having dealt with you, I am not surprised anymore about Ireland and I start
> to believe many stereotypes about "the mick" are actually very true, Tool
Ah, Dickrub, life is full of surprises huh? Why is your country so
shit anyway if you're all so smart and not afraid to tell us how smart
you are? Shouldn't a few of you guys be smart enough to train as
doctors and save those dying babies you have over there? Don't
Italians care about dying babies Rubber Dick, or are they all on the
internet talking complete shit and getting (metaphorically,
probably :-) ) buttficked?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/23/2009 6:35:15 PM
|
|
On May 23, 7:34=A0pm, "me" <m...@here.com> wrote:
> He may have a life unlike your gay self!!
I'll have to watch out for this one. Humourless, vague AND pathetic.
He MAY have a life? So he MAY not? Did you hear what he just said
about you Rubber Dick? And do you mean "gay" as in "happy" in keeping
with Rubber Dick's persistent use of 200 year old English phrases?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/23/2009 6:42:19 PM
|
|
On May 23, 7:20=A0pm, daniel.oto...@ucd.ie wrote:
>the C65 isn't a landmark or much use
And I'm still willing to say the C65 is kinda cool and probably fun to
"mess" ;-) around with, but if I had a C65, no C64 and no money, the
C65 would be on ebay in a second.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/23/2009 6:51:13 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:766b484e-5baf-476c-a081-aef1cab44090@q16g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...
> On May 23, 7:20 pm, daniel.oto...@ucd.ie wrote:
>>the C65 isn't a landmark or much use
>
> And I'm still willing to say the C65 is kinda cool and probably fun to
> "mess" ;-) around with, but if I had a C65, no C64 and no money, the
> C65 would be on ebay in a second.
Go listen to the Corrs
Jimmy.!
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
me
|
5/23/2009 7:02:36 PM
|
|
Can I have your C65?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
me
|
5/23/2009 7:49:00 PM
|
|
It`s like an A600/A500 but no
software!?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
me
|
5/23/2009 7:56:45 PM
|
|
On May 23, 8:02=A0pm, "me" <m...@here.com> wrote:
> Go listen to the Corrs
> Jimmy.!
Don't mess with this guy fellas, he's a cold hearted killer.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/23/2009 7:58:34 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:6ec26b14-b7e2-42ca-9680-5613e8e025c2@k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> On May 23, 6:50 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> Learn to use Google and you'll find out, Tool. Even an amoeba would have
>> already found relevant links to that expression. But your low IQ is your
>> worst enemy.
>
> You know, if you had a brain or a leg to stand on you would've just
> told us which search match gave us a definition of the exact phrase
> you used. You won't 'cos you can't 'cos you're a dumbass Dickhead.
There are many occurences in literature, shithead, although I understand an
illiterate, boozehound from Ireland hardly knows about literature. I will
choose one fine example, for a reason:
"Fair as the moon, clear as the sun". Canticles 6th, 10, 2 ( The Song of
Solomon ).
A pro-life catholic like you should know better about the bible. But,
probably, like every average mick, you're too smashed on Guinness to listen
to the hymns at Church. All you micks know about catholic religion is the
part when Jesus turns water into wine - the Irish version is probably
turning water into beer.
>
>> Chill, Tool. Go drink a glass of water and then come back.
>
> FFS that was harsh. Not.
>
>> > Because you're an asshole? I've no idea why crazy Italian Dickheads do
>> > the stupid things they do. Who does?
>>
>> Probably people from countries with an higher IQ average ?
>
> So people from countries with high average IQs know why crazy Italian
> Dickheads do the stupid things they do? That's good to know. I guess
> one of them might chip in their theory on you sometime then Rubber
> Dick.
Maybe. you will never understand it because of your very low IQ. It would be
something you couldn't grasp anyway.
>> You seem obsessed with sodomy as much as you're obsessed with measuring
>> dicks. I don't know why you decided to come out of the closet here in
>> comp.sys.cbm, but usually gay people do parades and stuff, why don't you
>> join one and get the fuck out of here, Tool?
>
> Buttfucked is a metaphor. Unless you are literally being buttfucked,
> in which case enjoy! ;-)
Your continuous use of sodomy and penis references speaks a lot about what
are your true obsessions. You're the first openly gay mick I meet. I hope
you'll also be the last. Maybe the catholic priest at your church gave you
too much of his special love when you were kid, huh?
Go ahead, Tool. Pull another fart out of your empty skull.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/23/2009 8:02:21 PM
|
|
funguol
Don`t waste your time on fools!
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
me
|
5/23/2009 8:02:38 PM
|
|
Will you fuck-up and die?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
me
|
5/23/2009 8:19:37 PM
|
|
On May 23, 9:02 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> There are many occurences in literature, shithead, although I understand an
> illiterate, boozehound from Ireland hardly knows about literature. I will
> choose one fine example, for a reason:
>
> "Fair as the moon, clear as the sun". Canticles 6th, 10, 2 ( The Song of
> Solomon ).
So you think phrases from the bible are commonly used English, doth
thee? And that's a reference to a woman's complexion you stupid (shit/
Dick)head so it doesn't even fit what you're trying to say. Put in
another quarter asshole if you want another kicking.
> A pro-life catholic like you should know better about the bible. But,
> probably, like every average mick, you're too smashed on Guinness to listen
> to the hymns at Church. All you micks know about catholic religion is the
> part when Jesus turns water into wine - the Irish version is probably
> turning water into beer.
Guinness isn't a beer you fuckwit. I've heard everything now, except
even more of your bullshit of course which will no doubt follow. An
Italian pulling the piss out of an Irishman about Catholicism? You've
got to be fucking joking.
> > So people from countries with high average IQs know why crazy Italian
> > Dickheads do the stupid things they do? That's good to know. I guess
> > one of them might chip in their theory on you sometime then Rubber
> > Dick.
>
> Maybe. you will never understand it because of your very low IQ. It would be
> something you couldn't grasp anyway.
You didn't actually dispute your idiotic comments in that reply you
asshole Dick Rubber. Did you even notice that?
> Your continuous use of sodomy and penis references speaks a lot about what
> are your true obsessions. You're the first openly gay mick I meet. I hope
> you'll also be the last. Maybe the catholic priest at your church gave you
> too much of his special love when you were kid, huh?
You're the guy who thinks of homosexuality every time he hears the
word penis and now you're telling me I'm gay? And another Catholic
joke from an Italian? WTF are you on Dick?
> Go ahead, Tool. Pull another fart out of your empty skull.
Your biology is as good as your psychoanalysis, Rubber Dick.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/23/2009 8:21:40 PM
|
|
I`d rather fuck an italian, then an irish?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
me
|
5/23/2009 8:42:17 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:cf38d28c-cd3b-40b6-ad2b-418d465c9079@w40g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
> On May 23, 6:54 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> I am not saying anything, that book says so.
>
> Aww, poor Dickrub. You sound like you're going to cry now.
Really? I didn't notice that at all, but if you say it, it must be true,
maybe in some places like Ireland it is. You now, some places and people in
the World live in their own reality, expecially where a pathological abuse
of alcohol is the norm.
> So are the IQs in that book right or wrong?
Judging at what we have here, Ireland is widely overestimated in that book.
An IQ of 30 would be more correct, but that would make you inferior to a
dog's own shit. Maybe we'll meet an Irishman who is intelligent - no, it
won't be you - and we'll think Ireland is underrated.
> Come on then, you can't have it both ways unless you're bisexual, can you?
Bisexuals, fruits, transvestism, sodomy...It's you the one who has all the
first hand knowledge here, when it comes to sexual misconduct. I don't know
shit, I am straight and I am very happy getting laid with women.
>> I am surprised about Greece,
>> Croatia and Ireland having such low IQ averages, but to be honest, after
>> having dealt with you, I am not surprised anymore about Ireland and I
>> start
>> to believe many stereotypes about "the mick" are actually very true, Tool
>
> Ah, Dickrub, life is full of surprises huh? Why is your country so
> shit anyway if you're all so smart and not afraid to tell us how smart
> you are?
Uh? Nonsense...
> Shouldn't a few of you guys be smart enough to train as
> doctors and save those dying babies you have over there?
Nonsense part II... Which babies are you talking about?
> Don't Italians care about dying babies Rubber Dick, or are they all on the
> internet talking complete shit and getting (metaphorically,
> probably :-) ) buttficked?
Nonsense part III. Were you all broke when brains were for sale?
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/23/2009 9:21:33 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:79eaf754-23c6-4a5f-9dbd-3743f876b727@h2g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...
> On May 23, 9:02 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> There are many occurences in literature, shithead, although I understand
>> an
>> illiterate, boozehound from Ireland hardly knows about literature. I will
>> choose one fine example, for a reason:
>>
>> "Fair as the moon, clear as the sun". Canticles 6th, 10, 2 ( The Song of
>> Solomon ).
>
> So you think phrases from the bible are commonly used English, doth
> thee?
Art thou really that illiterate thou hast no knowledge on how to use the
"thou" declination? Taking English lessons from an Italian, tsk tsk... Go
suck dicks in Congo, Danny boy, and bring your ruler.
First you say "clear as the sun" is my invention, then I bring you one
example ( there are many others ) and you complain it's from the Bible so it
doesn't count. You have been proven wrong and still you can't accept it,
just as you can't accept the fact the English own the ass of a big chunk of
your land.
>And that's a reference to a woman's complexion you stupid (shit/
> Dick)head so it doesn't even fit what you're trying to say. Put in
> another quarter asshole if you want another kicking.
>
>> A pro-life catholic like you should know better about the bible. But,
>> probably, like every average mick, you're too smashed on Guinness to
>> listen
>> to the hymns at Church. All you micks know about catholic religion is the
>> part when Jesus turns water into wine - the Irish version is probably
>> turning water into beer.
>
> Guinness isn't a beer you fuckwit.
No? Check out http://www.guinness.com/ . It's called beer everywhere. But,
hey, I agree with you, it's not beer. It's just dark piss.
> I've heard everything now, except
> even more of your bullshit of course which will no doubt follow. An
> Italian pulling the piss out of an Irishman about Catholicism? You've
> got to be fucking joking.
I am an atheist and to me all you religious fundamentalists are equally
worthless and ridicoulous. So yeah, I am pulling the piss out of a fucking
mick about Catholicism.
>> Your continuous use of sodomy and penis references speaks a lot about
>> what
>> are your true obsessions. You're the first openly gay mick I meet. I hope
>> you'll also be the last. Maybe the catholic priest at your church gave
>> you
>> too much of his special love when you were kid, huh?
>
> You're the guy who thinks of homosexuality every time he hears the
> word penis and now you're telling me I'm gay?
No, but I think of homosexuality whenever I speak with a guy who is as
obsessed with penises and sodomy as much as you are.
>And another Catholic joke from an Italian? WTF are you on Dick?
Oliver O'Grady was Irish, not Italian. Maybe he was your priest back in the
day, you two share many common traits and maybe in the past you have shared
a lot more.intimate things
>> Go ahead, Tool. Pull another fart out of your empty skull.
>
> Your biology is as good as your psychoanalysis, Rubber Dick.
My biology is fine, it's just that you can't recognize someone calling you a
butthead with a word play; because of your very low IQ, way below the low
Irish average, you can't grasp such finesse.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/23/2009 10:19:41 PM
|
|
On May 23, 10:21 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> > Aww, poor Dickrub. You sound like you're going to cry now.
>
> <Dickrub says blah blah blah>
>
> > So are the IQs in that book right or wrong?
>
> <Dickrub says blah blah blah>
>
> > Come on then, you can't have it both ways unless you're bisexual, can you?
>
> <Dickrub says blah blah blah>
Nice try Rubber Dick, but you didn't answer the question, did you? Are
the IQs in that book right or wrong? There really is no need for
anything other than a yes or no answer. Fucked up big time didn't you?
Whatever my IQ is, you're the one feeling like a dumbfuck Dickhead
now.
> > Ah, Dickrub, life is full of surprises huh? Why is your country so
> > shit anyway if you're all so smart and not afraid to tell us how smart
> > you are?
>
> Uh? Nonsense...
Oooh, that's a great comeback. It's almost as good as "somebody help
me, I've shat my pants I'm getting so hammered".
> > Shouldn't a few of you guys be smart enough to train as
> > doctors and save those dying babies you have over there?
>
> Nonsense part II... Which babies are you talking about?
The ones in your country that die every year because your shithole has
a higher infant mortality rate. Hardly that difficult to guess what I
was talking about as I mentioned the same fucking thing earlier in the
thread. What are you on Rubber Dick? Can't you remember a couple of
posts back in this thread?
> > Don't Italians care about dying babies Rubber Dick, or are they all on the
> > internet talking complete shit and getting (metaphorically,
> > probably :-) ) buttficked?
>
> Nonsense part III. Were you all broke when brains were for sale?
Do they buy and sell brains where you're from? And you still haven't
answered why your country full of geniuses is such a backward poor-ass
shithole trash dump, have you? Commence avoiding that question....
NOW!!!
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/23/2009 10:22:28 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:d2c4520c-68c6-4e75-8e3e-b8a85558a13c@s12g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
> Nice try Rubber Dick, but you didn't answer the question, did you? Are
> the IQs in that book right or wrong?
I did, I said that, judging from you, the IQs in the book are right and
actually Ireland is overestimated. Should I say it again and again maybe it
will go deep into that vacuum filled skull that uselessly rests on your
shoulders?
> There really is no need for
> anything other than a yes or no answer. Fucked up big time didn't you?
> Whatever my IQ is, you're the one feeling like a dumbfuck Dickhead
> now.
I am just laughing. You are really hopeless, Danny Boy Tool. I can call you
butthead in your face and you don't even realize I did it, unless I write
and spell B-U-T-T-H-E-A-D. You're hopeless, really. :-)
>
>> > Ah, Dickrub, life is full of surprises huh? Why is your country so
>> > shit anyway if you're all so smart and not afraid to tell us how smart
>> > you are?
>>
>> Uh? Nonsense...
>
> Oooh, that's a great comeback. It's almost as good as "somebody help
> me, I've shat my pants I'm getting so hammered".
LOL. Yes, Danny Boy! You're the only one who looks hammered here, not only
by me, but by alcohol abuse first and foremost.
>> > Shouldn't a few of you guys be smart enough to train as
>> > doctors and save those dying babies you have over there?
>>
>> Nonsense part II... Which babies are you talking about?
>
> The ones in your country that die every year because your shithole has
> a higher infant mortality rate.
Ahhh... Proof ? Wait, I give you proof:
http://www.ciesin.columbia.edu/repository/povmap/maps/global/Europe_specific_imr.pdf
It says that Great Britain has an HIGHER mortality rate than Italy, just
like Portugual. You are a little better than Albany. From 5 to 10 dead
babies in Ireland per 1000 live births, against less than 5 in Italy.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAH
You fucking TOOL, at least choose an example that plays in your favour!
ROTFL!!!
> Hardly that difficult to guess what I
> was talking about as I mentioned the same fucking thing earlier in the
> thread. What are you on Rubber Dick? Can't you remember a couple of
> posts back in this thread?
>
>> > Don't Italians care about dying babies Rubber Dick, or are they all on
>> > the
>> > internet talking complete shit and getting (metaphorically,
>> > probably :-) ) buttficked?
>>
>> Nonsense part III. Were you all broke when brains were for sale?
>
> Do they buy and sell brains where you're from?
Tool, you're one stupid mick. You can't even explain the simplest of all
jokes.
> And you still haven't
> answered why your country full of geniuses is such a backward poor-ass
> shithole trash dump, have you? Commence avoiding that question....
> NOW!!!
Go back drink your guinness while I enjoy the history, culture and great
food of my "shithole" country. While you're at it, paint your face and jump
around a fire, it's what you used to do when we had Caesar here, who, by the
way, already owned your ass 2000 years ago. That's why you put Trapattoni at
the helm of your soccer team, maybe with an Italian intelligence in command
you might actually manage to finally win something.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/23/2009 10:35:58 PM
|
|
On May 23, 11:19 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> First you say "clear as the sun" is my invention, then I bring you one
> example ( there are many others ) and you complain it's from the Bible so it
> doesn't count. You have been proven wrong and still you can't accept it,
> just as you can't accept the fact the English own the ass of a big chunk of
> your land.
Does "clear as the sun", some ancient history pile of shit, actually
mean what you meant to say? No it doesn't. Wave bye bye to that point
fuckhead.
> >And that's a reference to a woman's complexion you stupid (shit/
> > Dick)head so it doesn't even fit what you're trying to say. Put in
> > another quarter asshole if you want another kicking.
And you left in my quote where I say so! You really do love getting
fucked up don't you? Where's the answer to this Dickrub? I don't see
any answer to this bit Dickrub! Come on, where is it Rubber Dick?
> > Guinness isn't a beer you fuckwit.
>
> No? Check outhttp://www.guinness.com/.
OK, Rubber Dick, I will
"Official site includes pictures, posters, wallpaper, screensavers,
and information on the company, its brewery and the ads behind the
famous Irish stout ..."
Hello? What was that last word? You want to read it out loud Rubber
Dick so your imaginary friends can hear what an ass you've made of
yourself?
> It's called beer everywhere. But,
> hey, I agree with you, it's not beer. It's just dark piss.
I didn't say whether I liked it or not, but I sure as fuck made you
look a chump Dickrub.
> I am an atheist and to me all you religious fundamentalists are equally
> worthless and ridicoulous. So yeah, I am pulling the piss out of a fucking
> mick about Catholicism.
Wake up and smell the runny stuff coming out of your ass bambino, I'm
an atheist too so keep up the insults against the church. Of course
they all just make you look a bigger and bigger Dickhead because you
think I give a shit.
> No, but I think of homosexuality whenever I speak with a guy who is as
> obsessed with penises and sodomy as much as you are.
>
Hey, I told you it was a metaphorical buttfucking you were getting,
but if you've got such a vivid imagination that you like to think it's
the real thing, be my guest. There's no laws against that in your
fascist dictatorship dump third world loser country, is there?
> Oliver O'Grady was Irish, not Italian.
And? Is your next line "There's never been an Italian pedo priest"??
> Maybe he was your priest back in the day
No it isn't, because of course there's been loads, so what the fuck is
the point of bringing that up unless you're deliberately making a Dick
of yourself?
> My biology is fine, it's just that you can't recognize someone calling you a
> butthead with a word play; because of your very low IQ, way below the low
> Irish average, you can't grasp such finesse.
I think the fact you think that's finesse make a point that I don't
have to now, thanks.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/23/2009 10:40:45 PM
|
|
On May 23, 11:35 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> > Nice try Rubber Dick, but you didn't answer the question, did you? Are
> > the IQs in that book right or wrong?
>
> I did, I said that, judging from you, the IQs in the book are right and
> actually Ireland is overestimated. Should I say it again and again maybe it
> will go deep into that vacuum filled skull that uselessly rests on your
> shoulders?
Very good, then you admit AGAIN that you think Croatians and Greeks
are stupid motherfuckers as they are lower on that IQ table than
Ireland. Well done, you'll make a lot of friends around Europe with
that outlook.
> I am just laughing. You are really hopeless, Danny Boy Tool. I can call you
> butthead in your face and you don't even realize I did it, unless I write
> and spell B-U-T-T-H-E-A-D. You're hopeless, really. :-)
Whateva. You answered the question and been fucked. Case closed.
> LOL. Yes, Danny Boy! You're the only one who looks hammered here, not only
> by me, but by alcohol abuse first and foremost.
You're saying I'm drunk? Haha, a drunk guy is making you look like a
complete jackass? What happened to those guys who were "agreeing" with
you Rubber Dick? Did you find that none of them actually said anything
about the C65 where the ones on my side did? How did that go for you
again? You just sorta tried to ignore it all happened right? Did your
fairyland friends tell you to pretend that never happened and the
buttfucking embarrassment of you losing an argument might go away?
> Ahhh... Proof ? Wait, I give you proof:
>
> http://www.ciesin.columbia.edu/repository/povmap/maps/global/Europe_s...
>
> It says that Great Britain has an HIGHER mortality rate than Italy....
That'd be a GREAT example if Ireland was in Great Britain, wouldn't
it, ASSHOLE. How many times do you want to fuck up in this thread
exactly? You better tell us how smart you are again Rubber Dick
becuase calamatous cock ups like that make you look a bit retarded to
be honest.
> Tool, you're one stupid mick. You can't even explain the simplest of all
> jokes.
You said it Rubber Dick, you only know the simplest of all jokes. What
a coincidence, you ARE the simplest of all jokes.
> Go back drink your guinness while I enjoy the history, culture and great
> food of my "shithole" country. While you're at it, paint your face and jump
> around a fire, it's what you used to do when we had Caesar here, who, by the
> way, already owned your ass 2000 years ago.
What is this, Back to the fucking Future? Do you live 2000 years ago
and have an internet connection to 2009? RIGHT FUCKING NOW BITCH my
country laughs at your primitive cheap ass ghetto cardboard city
cesspit. And you apparently had a head start, where the fuck did that
go, huh, with all you "smart" guys over there?
> That's why you put Trapattoni at
> the helm of your soccer team, maybe with an Italian intelligence in command
> you might actually manage to finally win something.
In case you didn't know, ah what the fuck you don't know fucking
anything, football is a *minority* sport here. How did your country do
in with your 10 times bigger population at your national sport against
us last time anyway? You only managed a draw on you own ground, didn't
you? Astounding.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/23/2009 11:03:32 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:0d63774a-d2fe-4b41-8638-febab06b42a5@z9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
> On May 23, 11:19 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> First you say "clear as the sun" is my invention, then I bring you one
>> example ( there are many others ) and you complain it's from the Bible so
>> it
>> doesn't count. You have been proven wrong and still you can't accept it,
>> just as you can't accept the fact the English own the ass of a big chunk
>> of
>> your land.
>
> Does "clear as the sun", some ancient history pile of shit, actually
> mean what you meant to say? No it doesn't. Wave bye bye to that point
> fuckhead.
Shut up, Tool. You've been proved wrong once again and you just can't accept
it, because you have no intellectual honesty and just like the Northern
micks you can't accept the fact you are losers whose ass is owned by someone
else. You said there are no "clear as the sun" quotes ever anywhere, I bring
46.500 homepages with the same quote and give a bible quote, but still you
have to play the IRA and make a fucking kamikaze out of yourself. You micks
never cease to amaze me, you are natural born lying losers.
>> >And that's a reference to a woman's complexion you stupid (shit/
>> > Dick)head so it doesn't even fit what you're trying to say. Put in
>> > another quarter asshole if you want another kicking.
>
> And you left in my quote where I say so! You really do love getting
> fucked up don't you? Where's the answer to this Dickrub? I don't see
> any answer to this bit Dickrub! Come on, where is it Rubber Dick?
I left it because your quote is clearly irrelevant to the point you formerly
tried to prove, alas there is no "as clear as the sun" saying ever used in
literature. When I proved you're a fucking Tool, because there are many
references in literature ( 46,500 google hits ), you had to explain why it
wasn't good and yadda, yadda. I don't give a fuck, you were just plainly
wrong when you said such saying was never used, period. Accept it or join
the IRA and blow some children and women like you scumbags use to do to feel
less of losers. This is what you micks do when proven wrong or inferior.
>> > Guinness isn't a beer you fuckwit.
>>
>> No? Check outhttp://www.guinness.com/.
>
> OK, Rubber Dick, I will
> "Official site includes pictures, posters, wallpaper, screensavers,
> and information on the company, its brewery and the ads behind the
> famous Irish stout ..."
And what stout means, shithead...?
dictionary.com:
A strong, very dark *beer* or ale.
Get it, you fucking tool? Guinness is beer, because stout is a special kind
of beer, but still beer. You just need to enter the Guinness' homepage to
read *beer* everywhere. I thought Rick Balkins was a fool, but you are the
most stupid single individual littering this place ever, also the most
ignorant and illiterate. Well, this is what people use to say about micks
anyway, and you live by the low mick standard.
>
> Hello? What was that last word? You want to read it out loud Rubber
> Dick so your imaginary friends can hear what an ass you've made of
> yourself?
>
>
>> It's called beer everywhere. But,
>> hey, I agree with you, it's not beer. It's just dark piss.
>
> I didn't say whether I liked it or not, but I sure as fuck made you
> look a chump Dickrub.
Who gives a fuck what beer you drink, dimwit. The only one you looked like a
chump, illiterate fool is you, Danny Boy O'Toole, a fucking mick who doesn't
even know stout is beer and claims to be Irish. What a loser.
>> I am an atheist and to me all you religious fundamentalists are equally
>> worthless and ridicoulous. So yeah, I am pulling the piss out of a
>> fucking
>> mick about Catholicism.
>
> Wake up and smell the runny stuff coming out of your ass bambino, I'm
> an atheist too so keep up the insults against the church. Of course
> they all just make you look a bigger and bigger Dickhead because you
> think I give a shit.
You do, just look how you defend your pal Oliver O'Grady below, such a great
expression of micks' culture and heritage.
>> No, but I think of homosexuality whenever I speak with a guy who is as
>> obsessed with penises and sodomy as much as you are.
>>
>
> Hey, I told you it was a metaphorical buttfucking you were getting,
You being metaphorical? Please, you wouldn't recognize a metaphor even if it
had metaphor written on it.
> but if you've got such a vivid imagination that you like to think it's
> the real thing, be my guest. There's no laws against that in your
> fascist dictatorship dump third world loser country, is there?
No, even a mick like you could walk around freely here, without the risk of
being disposed in the gutter like the dogshit he is.
>> Oliver O'Grady was Irish, not Italian.
>
> And? Is your next line "There's never been an Italian pedo priest"??
No, but the most famous ones are ALL irish, aka micks... It's probably part
of the micks' great heritage.
>> Maybe he was your priest back in the day
>
> No it isn't, because of course there's been loads, so what the fuck is
> the point of bringing that up unless you're deliberately making a Dick
> of yourself?
Truth hurts, huh?
>> My biology is fine, it's just that you can't recognize someone calling
>> you a
>> butthead with a word play; because of your very low IQ, way below the low
>> Irish average, you can't grasp such finesse.
>
> I think the fact you think that's finesse make a point that I don't
> have to now, thanks.
Finesse obviously was ironical, because it's far from that, but again, you
don't get it, because you are as intelligent as whale's shit. You don't even
figure out what an utter clown you've made of yourself so far, it's simply
amazing. Keep up the good work, mick.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/23/2009 11:09:21 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:1e66e10b-0b91-437c-948a-171d48fcc55b@z9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
> On May 23, 11:35 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> > Nice try Rubber Dick, but you didn't answer the question, did you? Are
>> > the IQs in that book right or wrong?
>>
>> I did, I said that, judging from you, the IQs in the book are right and
>> actually Ireland is overestimated. Should I say it again and again maybe
>> it
>> will go deep into that vacuum filled skull that uselessly rests on your
>> shoulders?
>
> Very good, then you admit AGAIN that you think Croatians and Greeks
> are stupid motherfuckers as they are lower on that IQ table than
> Ireland. Well done, you'll make a lot of friends around Europe with
> that outlook.
I will simply cut and pase, because you mick just don't get it:
>> judging from you, the IQs in the book are right and
>> actually Ireland is overestimated. Should I say it again and again maybe
>> it
>> will go deep into that vacuum filled skull that uselessly rests on your
>> shoulders?
---
I won't rephrase that, because everyone else got that but you. And that's
all I care.
>> I am just laughing. You are really hopeless, Danny Boy Tool. I can call
>> you
>> butthead in your face and you don't even realize I did it, unless I write
>> and spell B-U-T-T-H-E-A-D. You're hopeless, really. :-)
>
> Whateva.
No no no, mick... There's no "whateva". You just been proved an ignorant
illiterate fuck once again, and you can't run like a scared rabbit all the
time, pretending none notices it.
> You answered the question and been fucked. Case closed.
There is no case closed, this thread is closed when I decide it is, because
you're my little toy and you go nowhere, Tool, you belong to me and do
exactly what I expect you to do, that is playing MY game - and you still
haven't figured that out. LOL
>> LOL. Yes, Danny Boy! You're the only one who looks hammered here, not
>> only
>> by me, but by alcohol abuse first and foremost.
>
> You're saying I'm drunk? Haha, a drunk guy is making you look like a
> complete jackass?
A drunk guy thinks he's the best around, just like you do. But you are only
the town idiot, so far, getting beaten to a pulp.
> What happened to those guys who were "agreeing" with
> you Rubber Dick? Did you find that none of them actually said anything
> about the C65 where the ones on my side did?
Nobody said you were right saying the C65 is useless because there's no
software for it. That's the only thing you said in this whole thread about
the C65. That's because you just were looking after a flame with me, because
I owned your silly mick ass last time in no time. And it's happening again.
And it will happen again, and again and again, mick.
> How did that go for you
> again? You just sorta tried to ignore it all happened right? Did your
> fairyland friends tell you to pretend that never happened and the
> buttfucking embarrassment of you losing an argument might go away?
I haven't lost one single argument so far, and you have been proved wrong
EVERY SINGLE TIME. But you pretend it didn't happen. Like you pretend
Northern Ireland is Ireland when, in fact, it's a colony of England. This is
how you micks deal with embarassment.
>> Ahhh... Proof ? Wait, I give you proof:
>>
>> http://www.ciesin.columbia.edu/repository/povmap/maps/global/Europe_s...
>>
>> It says that Great Britain has an HIGHER mortality rate than Italy....
>
> That'd be a GREAT example if Ireland was in Great Britain, wouldn't
> it, ASSHOLE. How many times do you want to fuck up in this thread
> exactly? You better tell us how smart you are again Rubber Dick
> becuase calamatous cock ups like that make you look a bit retarded to
> be honest.
Oh, you're right. Sorry, it's just that, since Great Britain owns a piece of
your fucking country and does as it please with the ass of every mick there,
while you micks from the south put anonymously bombs there like the cowards
you are, well, I did some confusion. The same OF COURSE applies for Ireland,
SHITHEAD. Check the pictures, can you do that? See the darker yellow? LOL
You infantry mortality rate IS HIGHER than Italy's, but, hey, you did better
than Albany.
Unfortunately Greeks might have a lower IQ, according to that book, but
still they made it better than you saving children. That's because your
doctor are probably busier getting owned by the English, or putting bombs to
kill your own children and women or simply drinking in the Pubs, getting
smashed like monkeys. I don't know. Everyone can check those statistics out
and see another of your false assumption was plainly WRONG: Ireland lets DIE
MORE CHILDREN than Italy. WOW!!! You made an ass out of yourself ONCE MORE,
Danny Boy Mick, or should I call you, Danny Boy Tool ?
>> Tool, you're one stupid mick. You can't even explain the simplest of all
>> jokes.
>
> You said it Rubber Dick, you only know the simplest of all jokes. What
> a coincidence, you ARE the simplest of all jokes.
But still your low IQ plagued brain can't get it. If you got it, you
wouldn't be here arguing with a joke, but rather you would have moved on. So
why are you still here? You don't pay so much attention and time to mess
with a "joke". Strange, huh? AHAHAHA... Your conduct simply plays against
your actions, mick.
>> Go back drink your guinness while I enjoy the history, culture and great
>> food of my "shithole" country. While you're at it, paint your face and
>> jump
>> around a fire, it's what you used to do when we had Caesar here, who, by
>> the
>> way, already owned your ass 2000 years ago.
>
>
> What is this, Back to the fucking Future? Do you live 2000 years ago
> and have an internet connection to 2009? RIGHT FUCKING NOW BITCH my
> country laughs at your primitive cheap ass ghetto cardboard city
> cesspit. And you apparently had a head start, where the fuck did that
> go, huh, with all you "smart" guys over there?
Yeah, you laugh at Italy on top of one of the lowest IQ average in Europe
and higher infantry mortality rate. AHAHAHAHAH, we were better 2000 years
ago and we're still better now.
>> That's why you put Trapattoni at
>> the helm of your soccer team, maybe with an Italian intelligence in
>> command
>> you might actually manage to finally win something.
>
> In case you didn't know, ah what the fuck you don't know fucking
> anything, football is a *minority* sport here. How did your country do
> in with your 10 times bigger population at your national sport against
> us last time anyway? You only managed a draw on you own ground, didn't
> you? Astounding.
It's well known here Trapattoni does miracles, his latest was turning Irish
monkeys into football players.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/23/2009 11:28:35 PM
|
|
On May 24, 12:09 am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> Shut up, Tool. You've been proved wrong once again and you just can't accept
> it, because you have no intellectual honesty and just like the Northern
> micks you can't accept the fact you are losers whose ass is owned by someone
> else. You said there are no "clear as the sun" quotes ever anywhere, I bring
> 46.500 homepages with the same quote and give a bible quote, but still you
> have to play the IRA and make a fucking kamikaze out of yourself. You micks
> never cease to amaze me, you are natural born lying losers.
You know, one thing that is "clear as day" is that you're a typical
slimy cheating Italian lowlife. What I said was I'd never heard of the
phrase in my life, and looking at the shitty links in that Google
search I can see why. Shitty albums, shitty books, shitty religous
cults. Do you really think it's that hard to get 46,500 matches on
Google? Fuck, it doesn't even register as an idiomatic expression in
the dictionary it's so shit.
And so does "clear as the sun" mean something "is obvious"? No it
doesn't, which is what you wanted to say originally, but fucked it up
an AGAIN -> here's where you ignore that again so you can pretend
you're not getting buttfucked.
> I left it because your quote is clearly irrelevant to the point you formerly
> tried to prove, alas there is no "as clear as the sun" saying ever used in
> literature. When I proved you're a fucking Tool, because there are many
> references in literature ( 46,500 google hits ), you had to explain why it
> wasn't good and yadda, yadda. I don't give a fuck, you were just plainly
> wrong when you said such saying was never used, period. Accept it or join
> the IRA and blow some children and women like you scumbags use to do to feel
> less of losers. This is what you micks do when proven wrong or inferior.
46,500 Google shits, sorry hits, we heard your bullshit the last few
times thanks. IT IS NOT LISTED AS AN IDION IN THE DICTIONARY. It
simply isn't a "phrase" anyone would ever use. So when you were saying
"yadda yadda was as clear as the sun", you meant to say "yadda yadda
had a lovely skin tone"? WTF is that supposed to mean?
> And what stout means, shithead...?
>
> dictionary.com:
>
> A strong, very dark *beer* or ale.
>
What would I know, I only live here where we make and drink it, huh.
Walk into a bar here and ask for beer and see what you get. It won't
be Guinness. It's might be Nasty Ass-uro or some other pigwank.
> Who gives a fuck what beer you drink, dimwit.
You do. You've been telling me what I've been drinking for the last 20
posts moron.
> You do, just look how you defend your pal Oliver O'Grady below, such a great
> expression of micks' culture and heritage.
Right after you lost yourself you lost me. If you've been repeatedly
abused as a child, and didn't enjoy it, maybe you should seek help or
something, because you are making *zero* sense.
> You being metaphorical? Please, you wouldn't recognize a metaphor even if it
> had metaphor written on it.
Do you get all your joke from children's TV? No, some children's TV is
entertaining.
> No, even a mick like you could walk around freely here, without the risk of
> being disposed in the gutter like the dogshit he is.
Wow, thanks for being so nice to us Micks! What's this I hear about
your government fingerprinting every gypsy in Italy though? I'd *LOVE*
to live in a country that persecutes minorities like that. Can I move?
> No, but the most famous ones are ALL irish, aka micks... It's probably part
> of the micks' great heritage.
Well done for admitting you had no point. Unless you really think it's
important whether a pedo priest is famous or not? Well, do you?
> > No it isn't, because of course there's been loads, so what the fuck is
> > the point of bringing that up unless you're deliberately making a Dick
> > of yourself?
>
> Truth hurts, huh?
Yes, the truth of you being a Rubber Dick hurts immensely every time I
have to make sense of your idiotic posts. Oh, were you talking about
pedo priests? Couldn't give a shit about them. Why are you so
interested in them anyway? Does this fit in with your theory that if
you talk about something a lot you might have some connection with the
topic?
> Finesse obviously was ironical, because it's far from that, but again, you
> don't get it, because you are as intelligent as whale's shit. You don't even
> figure out what an utter clown you've made of yourself so far, it's simply
> amazing. Keep up the good work, mick.
Ah, we're getting used to the lame ass "joke" last paragraph now. Are
they written by a bot or a "bot"tom, i.e. your anus? Dick rubber, did
you find a map yet? Where's Croatia and Great Britain anyway? Aren't
you really smart, like you told us?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/23/2009 11:55:12 PM
|
|
On May 24, 12:28 am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> I will simply cut and pase, because you mick just don't get it:
>
> >> judging from you, the IQs in the book are right and
> >> actually Ireland is overestimated. Should I say it again and again maybe
> >> it
> >> will go deep into that vacuum filled skull that uselessly rests on your
> >> shoulders?
>
> ---
>
> I won't rephrase that, because everyone else got that but you. And that's
> all I care.
I know, WE GET IT. You agree with the book ("the IQs in the book are
right") and think Croatians and Greeks are stupid shits. That's fine,
you've made yourself perfectly clear this once Dickrub.
> > Whateva.
>
> No no no, mick... There's no "whateva". You just been proved an ignorant
> illiterate fuck once again, and you can't run like a scared rabbit all the
> time, pretending none notices it.
Hey, I'll be "mick"head and you can be "Dick"head, OK? Do you think no-
one notices you're calling all Croatians and Greeks assholes? Scared
of what? You might say something that isn't shit and I'll die of
shock?
> There is no case closed, this thread is closed when I decide it is, because
> you're my little toy and you go nowhere, Tool, you belong to me and do
> exactly what I expect you to do, that is playing MY game - and you still
> haven't figured that out. LOL
Rubbing Dick, if I'm your toy then I must be a didlo because I'm
fucking you right up the ass.
> A drunk guy thinks he's the best around, just like you do. But you are only
> the town idiot, so far, getting beaten to a pulp.
Hey, you said I lived in the country with cows! Do make up your, er,
mind, if that's the right word.
> Nobody said you were right saying the C65 is useless because there's no
> software for it. That's the only thing you said in this whole thread about
> the C65. That's because you just were looking after a flame with me, because
> I owned your silly mick ass last time in no time. And it's happening again.
> And it will happen again, and again and again, mick.
Hahaha Dickrub, you think you matter a shit to me that I even
registered the name "Dick Rubbin" when I saw your post? Shall we take
a trip down memory lane?
Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm
From: "Clocky" <nice...@migo.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 22:28:59 +0800
I don't think so. It's not a question of bashing anyway, it's a
question of
usefulness. Playing C64 games you can do on any C64, you don't need a
C65
for that. The ENIAC and Difference Engine both served a specific
purpose. So
what the makes the C65 in it's native mode so useful in your opinion?
Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm
From: Dragos <mglad...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 20:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
It is shit, plain and simple. Cool, because of "what it could have
been", but alas, it is an incomplete, inconsistent, kludgy piece of
crap when you get right down to it.
Oops, that didn't help you much did it? In fact it sent the dildo
further up your ass, didn't it?
> I haven't lost one single argument so far,
Except the one about the wikipedia IQ table where you said Ireland was
the lowest in Europe? Or where you said I was being aggressive when I
didn't mention you at all only talked about the C65? Or when you said
I had sour grapes and (still) repeatedly fail to give anything to back
that up? Where you cocked up on Ireland being in Great Britain?
Yeah Rubber Dick, never once wrong!
> and you have been proved wrong
> EVERY SINGLE TIME. But you pretend it didn't happen. Like you pretend
> Northern Ireland is Ireland when, in fact, it's a colony of England. This is
> how you micks deal with embarassment.
Yeah, none of the above happened. Or the count of the people backing
your ass on the C65 which actually came to zero.
> Oh, you're right. Sorry,
Um, didn't you just say you've been right ALL the time, or did that
just end here?
> it's just that, since Great Britain owns a piece of
> your fucking country and does as it please with the ass of every mick there,
> while you micks from the south put anonymously bombs there like the cowards
> you are, well, I did some confusion. The same OF COURSE applies for Ireland,
> SHITHEAD. Check the pictures, can you do that? See the darker yellow? LOL
> You infantry mortality rate IS HIGHER than Italy's, but, hey, you did better
> than Albany.
Italy: Infant mortality rate: total: 5.51 deaths/1,000 live births
Ireland: Infant mortality rate: total: 5.05 deaths/1,000 live births
From the CIA world factbook. What is that you're babbling rubber dick,
is it a CIA conspiracy against Italy?
> Unfortunately Greeks might have a lower IQ, according to that book, but
> still they made it better than you saving children. That's because your
> doctor are probably busier getting owned by the English, or putting bombs to
> kill your own children and women or simply drinking in the Pubs, getting
> smashed like monkeys. I don't know. Everyone can check those statistics out
> and see another of your false assumption was plainly WRONG: Ireland lets DIE
> MORE CHILDREN than Italy. WOW!!! You made an ass out of yourself ONCE MORE,
> Danny Boy Mick, or should I call you, Danny Boy Tool ?
Dig dig dig asshole. I like the way you drag out a fact you fucked up
on for as long as possible to maximize how stupid you look. Thanks.
How did your last war go anyway, while we're at it? Invade any thirs
world nations lately? Set up any concentration camps for those gypsies
you're fingerprinting? You know the Germans aren't with ye this time,
right?
> Yeah, you laugh at Italy on top of one of the lowest IQ average in Europe
> and higher infantry mortality rate. AHAHAHAHAH, we were better 2000 years
> ago and we're still better now.
OK, OK, we get it, you agree with that book that says Croatians and
Greeks are assholes, you don't have to rub it in on them just because
that book says they're not as smart as Micks.
Did you look up that CIA factbook yet? How many babies have do die
Rubber Dick? How many babies?
> It's well known here Trapattoni does miracles, his latest was turning Irish
> monkeys into football players.
Who was Irish manager in 1994 when Houghton stuffed ye in the US at
that minority sport again? What multiple of our population do you have
again?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/24/2009 12:24:56 AM
|
|
daniel.otoole@ucd.ie wrote:
> On May 24, 12:09 am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
<snip>
>>
>> dictionary.com:
>>
>> A strong, very dark *beer* or ale.
>>
>
> What would I know, I only live here where we make and drink it, huh.
> Walk into a bar here and ask for beer and see what you get.
That's like walking into a record store and asking for music...
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Clocky
|
5/24/2009 12:43:46 AM
|
|
On Sat, 23 May 2009, Riccardo Rubini wrote:
> There are many occurences in literature, shithead, although I understand an
> illiterate, boozehound from Ireland hardly knows about literature. I will
> choose one fine example, for a reason:
>
> "Fair as the moon, clear as the sun". Canticles 6th, 10, 2 ( The Song of
> Solomon ).
>
> A pro-life catholic like you should know better about the bible. But,
> probably, like every average mick, you're too smashed on Guinness to listen
> to the hymns at Church. All you micks know about catholic religion is the
> part when Jesus turns water into wine - the Irish version is probably
> turning water into beer.
Hey, watch it, I got Irish blood (and the Irish taste for alcohol) :P
(and Song of Songs 6.10 KJV indeed follows your citation, but in the
Catholic Challoner it's 6.9 with a slightly different reading :P)
-uso.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
lyricalnanoha
|
5/24/2009 1:47:32 AM
|
|
On May 15, 3:07=A0am, "Jack Tseng" <tse...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Commodore 65 is very interesting... Questions....
>
> 3 inch drive built in C65, it has 1581 rom?
>
> In C64 mode, use the permanent drive #8 as 3 inch drive or disable 3 inch
> drive, external 1541 drive enabled?
When this thread started, I was interested in the discussion on the
C65.
Now I hope those who have steered it a long way off-topic are cross-
posting all the insults to alt.pointless.arguments
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Merman
|
5/24/2009 7:47:41 AM
|
|
On May 24, 2:47=A0am, lyricalnanoha
<lyricalnan...@usotsuki.hoshinet.org> wrote:
> (and Song of Songs 6.10 KJV indeed follows your citation, but in the
> Catholic Challoner it's 6.9 with a slightly different reading :P)
"Who is she that looketh forth as the morning, fair as the moon, clear
as the sun, and terrible as an army with banners?"
Yeah, those words have been put in that order at some point in the
history of English, but it's not an idiomatic expression and it refers
to skin tone not something being obvious like Rubber Dick would like
it to.
Pretty much a disaster all round for him bringing it up.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/24/2009 8:08:04 AM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:dc028b8b-c6d3-4f7f-81f9-6f4b7ce5adc1@h2g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...
> On May 24, 12:09 am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> Shut up, Tool. You've been proved wrong once again and you just can't
>> accept
>> it, because you have no intellectual honesty and just like the Northern
>> micks you can't accept the fact you are losers whose ass is owned by
>> someone
>> else. You said there are no "clear as the sun" quotes ever anywhere, I
>> bring
>> 46.500 homepages with the same quote and give a bible quote, but still
>> you
>> have to play the IRA and make a fucking kamikaze out of yourself. You
>> micks
>> never cease to amaze me, you are natural born lying losers.
>
> You know, one thing that is "clear as day" is that you're a typical
> slimy cheating Italian lowlife. What I said was I'd never heard of the
> phrase in my life,
But you're one illiterate fucking mick with a very low IQ, no culture and
laughable knowledge of English! So the fact YOU didn't know about it,
doesn't mean it doesn exist.
"Clear as the sun"
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22clear+as+the+sun%22&aq=f&oq
211,000 hits on Google.
George Washington, 1774: "clear as the sun in its meridian brightness".
It's in the ENGLISH DICTIONARY:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/clear
Danny Boy Tool, as with everything here, YOU ARE WRONG ( #1 ).
Next...
>> I left it because your quote is clearly irrelevant to the point you
>> formerly
>> tried to prove, alas there is no "as clear as the sun" saying ever used
>> in
>> literature. When I proved you're a fucking Tool, because there are many
>> references in literature ( 46,500 google hits ), you had to explain why
>> it
>> wasn't good and yadda, yadda. I don't give a fuck, you were just plainly
>> wrong when you said such saying was never used, period. Accept it or join
>> the IRA and blow some children and women like you scumbags use to do to
>> feel
>> less of losers. This is what you micks do when proven wrong or inferior.
>
> 46,500 Google shits, sorry hits, we heard your bullshit the last few
> times thanks. IT IS NOT LISTED AS AN IDION IN THE DICTIONARY. It
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/clear
Read, illiterate mick, read... English, the language of England, the nation
that owned your ass throughout history...
WRONG again...( #2 )
>> And what stout means, shithead...?
>>
>> dictionary.com:
>>
>> A strong, very dark *beer* or ale.
>>
>
> What would I know, I only live here where we make and drink it, huh.
Because, again, you are an illiterate, dumb as fuck, MICK, with zero
knowledge of English. You are incapable to understand the simple logic:
"every stout is a beer, but not every beer is a stout" - that's because of
your very low IQ. The way you act gives only credit to that famous book that
says you micks are the most utmost stupid tools among all the rich countries
in Europe.
WRONG AGAIN...( #3 )
And when you're wrong, you simply say, like an utter fool "I don't know
shit, I only live here in mickland, we are all illiterate micks, etc.". Then
stay in fucking mickland and shut the fuck up, Tool.
> Walk into a bar here and ask for beer and see what you get. It won't
> be Guinness. It's might be Nasty Ass-uro or some other pigwank.
Who gives a fuck whether the average pub owner in Mickland is an illiterate
dumb fuck just as you. I don't give a shit, I don't have to live there among
illiterate micks, thank god.
>> Who gives a fuck what beer you drink, dimwit.
>
> You do. You've been telling me what I've been drinking for the last 20
> posts moron.
>
>> You do, just look how you defend your pal Oliver O'Grady below, such a
>> great
>> expression of micks' culture and heritage.
>
> Right after you lost yourself you lost me. If you've been repeatedly
> abused as a child, and didn't enjoy it, maybe you should seek help or
> something, because you are making *zero* sense.
Danny Boy Tool, evidence, evidence, evidence ... You pretend others have
been abused, but you're the only one here talking about measuring his own
dick, his girlfriend calling him a deformed monster, repeatedly doing
references to sodomy, dildo's and other tools that belong either in the
world of an horny gay or father O'Grady's.
So this is MAKING AN ASS OUT OF YOUR MICK SELF part #1...
>> You being metaphorical? Please, you wouldn't recognize a metaphor even if
>> it
>> had metaphor written on it.
>
> Do you get all your joke from children's TV? No, some children's TV is
> entertaining.
AHAHAHAHAAH... You basically admit what you do all day long is watching
children TV, so if my jokes were on children TV, you would have heard them.
Let's call this: MAKING AN ASS OUT OF YOUR MICK SELF part #2...
>> No, even a mick like you could walk around freely here, without the risk
>> of
>> being disposed in the gutter like the dogshit he is.
>
> Wow, thanks for being so nice to us Micks! What's this I hear about
> your government fingerprinting every gypsy in Italy though? I'd *LOVE*
> to live in a country that persecutes minorities like that. Can I move?
Unfortunately you can move, yes, like all the other micks who come as
tourists here to finally watch some culture, monuments and stuff that, of
course, is not present in a land with no relevant history like mickland.
And I agree with my government about Gypsies 100%. If you love Gypsies so
much, I suggest you to go live near a Gypsies camp with your family in Rome.
You thought I was ashamed of my government because of that? Fucking no.
This is MAKING AN ASS OUT OF YOUR MICK SELF part #3...
>> No, but the most famous ones are ALL irish, aka micks... It's probably
>> part
>> of the micks' great heritage.
>
> Well done for admitting you had no point. Unless you really think it's
> important whether a pedo priest is famous or not? Well, do you?
You should be proud of father O'Grady, as you have a lot in common, first
of all, you're both micks, secondly you're both two disgusting losers.
>> > No it isn't, because of course there's been loads, so what the fuck is
>> > the point of bringing that up unless you're deliberately making a Dick
>> > of yourself?
>>
>> Truth hurts, huh?
>
> Yes, the truth of you being a Rubber Dick hurts immensely every time I
> have to make sense of your idiotic posts. Oh, were you talking about
> pedo priests? Couldn't give a shit about them.
You should. Ireland makes the news in other countries for a ) Pedo priests
raping children b ) Fucking IRA terrorists blowing women and children with
bombs. For the rest, you never hear about Ireland in the news, probably
because nothing really relevant happens in that country. So, you should be
worried about the great Irish heritage the world gets from the news.
> Why are you so
> interested in them anyway? Does this fit in with your theory that if
> you talk about something a lot you might have some connection with the
> topic?
No, that's YOUR theory, mick.
>
>> Finesse obviously was ironical, because it's far from that, but again,
>> you
>> don't get it, because you are as intelligent as whale's shit. You don't
>> even
>> figure out what an utter clown you've made of yourself so far, it's
>> simply
>> amazing. Keep up the good work, mick.
>
> Ah, we're getting used to the lame ass "joke" last paragraph now. Are
> they written by a bot or a "bot"tom, i.e. your anus? Dick rubber, did
> you find a map yet? Where's Croatia and Great Britain anyway? Aren't
> you really smart, like you told us?
Oh, yes, I did two mistakes. First I said that Ireland is the country in
Europe with the lowest IQ ever, but I should have said, to be correct, that
Ireland is the only *rich* country in Europe with such a bloody low IQ.
That doesn't change the fact Ireland has a fucking low IQ, lower than Italy
and lower than England, the country that owns a chunk of your land - for a
good reason, as it seems.
Secondly, I said that the infantry death rate in Great Britain is higher
than Italy, has shown in this document:
http://www.ciesin.columbia.edu/repository/povmap/maps/global/Europe_specific_imr.pdf
You said I was wrong, because Ireland is not part of Great Britain. Ok, I
was wrong, but still, Ireland rate is the same as Great Britain, so actually
higher than Italy's. Your utter idiocy about Italians being better at
killing babies more than micks is an UTTER NONSENSE, dissed also by many
studies and among these, the one above made by the Columbia university. Oh,
but you claim you read that on a CIA document. Bring this document on,
otherwise SHUT THE FUCK UP.
See? In this sole post you have been proven WRONG ***every single time ***
and made an ass out of yourself ***every single time*** . You can go on
with the "Dick Rubber" stuff - which doesn't offend me at all, because it's
so childish I find it actually funny - and you can go on trying to pretend
you have not made an ass out of yourself, that you have no clue about what
"as clear as the sun" means in your own language so it doesn't exist, you
have no clue that stout is a particular beer so it's not beer, and on and on
and on... Danny Boy, keep going. Nobody knew who you are before you begun to
flame, now everybody knows you're just one sick and stupid fuck.
Keep 'em coming, loser!
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/24/2009 8:43:36 AM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:0491e293-be3c-410f-bbef-a5ee6bde994e@z14g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
On May 24, 2:47 am, lyricalnanoha
<lyricalnan...@usotsuki.hoshinet.org> wrote:
> (and Song of Songs 6.10 KJV indeed follows your citation, but in the
> Catholic Challoner it's 6.9 with a slightly different reading :P)
>"Who is she that looketh forth as the morning, fair as the moon, clear
>as the sun, and terrible as an army with banners?"
Boston, More Than a Feeling:
[...]
Their faces fade as the years go by
Yet I still recall as I wander on
*** as clear as the sun *** in the summer sky
It's more than a feeling
[...]
TOOL, the fact you are an ignorant, and just can manage to speak
>Yeah, those words have been put in that order at some point in the
>history of English, but it's not an idiomatic expression and it refers
>to skin tone not something being obvious like Rubber Dick would like
>it to.
So the boston tune refers to skin tone, TOOL ? And the Boston song is part
of the history of English, TOOL ?
> Pretty much a disaster all round for him bringing it up.
Check the dictionary, TOOL:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/clear
Check this dictionary of PROVERBS ( that is Idiomatic sentences, just in
case you illiterate mick don't know what a proverb is ):
http://books.google.com/books?id=7PMZJqSR4sAC&pg=PA102&lpg=PA102&dq=%22clear+as+the+sun%22+dictionary&source=bl&ots=ARgqJBNBQ7&sig=-zgNrmYej1fYNRTcgT7BnFVhvXg&hl=en&ei=5QkZSrO3FYuS_Qa88aTsDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5
"Clear as the sun" has been used since the middle age up to today, as found
in a Boston's song, you stupid illiterate FOOL.
This is all you really have against me, Tool. Pointing out one of my
expression has been never used in English. Such a pity this is WRONG, just
as you've been WRONG in everything else. Pretty much a disaster all your
offensive in a flame was based on such a trivial thing. Are you happy now
that you've made an utter fool out of yourself AGAIN?
Keep 'em coming, TOOL!
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/24/2009 8:51:41 AM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:e2b2ac4e-32e9-4d15-82e6-2ff1c2a6cd9a@i6g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
> On May 24, 12:28 am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> I will simply cut and pase, because you mick just don't get it:
>>
>> >> judging from you, the IQs in the book are right and
>> >> actually Ireland is overestimated. Should I say it again and again
>> >> maybe
>> >> it
>> >> will go deep into that vacuum filled skull that uselessly rests on
>> >> your
>> >> shoulders?
>>
>> ---
>>
>> I won't rephrase that, because everyone else got that but you. And that's
>> all I care.
>
> I know, WE GET IT. You agree with the book ("the IQs in the book are
> right") and think Croatians and Greeks are stupid shits. That's fine,
> you've made yourself perfectly clear this once Dickrub.
According to that book, Croatians and Greeks are stupid shits, true. But the
book says their excuse is POVERTY, so not every people there has access to
good schools and such, quite the contrary actually. The big question here
then is: with Ireland, as it's no poor country, WHAT IS THE EXCUSE for such
LOW IQ ?
Please answer this question: why you micks have access to good schools, have
the money still you have such a low IQ, one point higher to countries where
the majority of people can't afford going to schools?
Reply, Tool. I really would like you to explain this.
>> There is no case closed, this thread is closed when I decide it is,
>> because
>> you're my little toy and you go nowhere, Tool, you belong to me and do
>> exactly what I expect you to do, that is playing MY game - and you still
>> haven't figured that out. LOL
>
> Rubbing Dick, if I'm your toy then I must be a didlo because I'm
> fucking you right up the ass.
Yes, you're the winner here, like you when you said "clear as the sun" is
not an English expression, but I gave you examples from the Bible, quotes
from George Washington, quotes from The Boston in "More Than a Feeling" - a
song everyone and his sister knows about -, giving you links to proverb
books, giving you links to dictionaries carrying it... Yes, TOOL. You also
were winning when you claimed that STOUT IT'S NOT A BEER - ROTFL... Then,
when facing the evidence of you being a clown, with every dictionary in the
world saying STOUT IS A BEER, you backed off like a little shit, saying
you're a poor mick and don't know shit. LOSER! Oh, wait, you were fucking me
up when you said that Italy is better than Ireland in the IDR ( Infant Death
Rate ), but I brought you a study made by the Columbia University that
proves Ireland has an higher death rate than Italy. Enough? I am sure you
will go on, because you micks can't just accept your inferiority, that's why
you kill women and children in bombing, as "bravely" done by the cowards in
IRA.
>
>> I haven't lost one single argument so far,
>
> Except the one about the wikipedia IQ table where you said Ireland was
> the lowest in Europe? Or where you said I was being aggressive when I
> didn't mention you at all only talked about the C65? Or when you said
> I had sour grapes and (still) repeatedly fail to give anything to back
> that up? Where you cocked up on Ireland being in Great Britain?
> Yeah Rubber Dick, never once wrong!
I might have been superficial, but the facts don't change. Ireland is the
*rich* country with the lowest IQ in Europe, and since it's rich, the
average dumb mick has no excuse about being an illiterate fuck, contrary to
the average Greek or Croatian who can't pay for education because he has no
money. Maybe you micks prefer to spend your money in Guinness rather than
spend money in Books, as clearly shown by your illiterate claims ( "clear as
the sun" is no English expression, right? ). I made a mistake with saying
Ireland is in Great Britain, but still Ireland has the same high infant
death rate, higher than Italy, and I wonder why, maybe all your doctors are
busy getting smashed at the pub on Guinness while babies die?
All of your claims are utter nonsense, and all of your accusations have been
dismantled, thrown in the pit latrine and flushed, TOOL. Do you have
anything else you want me to destroy, apart from your reputation that is as
tainted as a public toilet's seat?
>> and you have been proved wrong
>> EVERY SINGLE TIME. But you pretend it didn't happen. Like you pretend
>> Northern Ireland is Ireland when, in fact, it's a colony of England. This
>> is
>> how you micks deal with embarassment.
>
> Yeah, none of the above happened. Or the count of the people backing
> your ass on the C65 which actually came to zero.
>
>> Oh, you're right. Sorry,
>
> Um, didn't you just say you've been right ALL the time, or did that
> just end here?
>
>> it's just that, since Great Britain owns a piece of
>> your fucking country and does as it please with the ass of every mick
>> there,
>> while you micks from the south put anonymously bombs there like the
>> cowards
>> you are, well, I did some confusion. The same OF COURSE applies for
>> Ireland,
>> SHITHEAD. Check the pictures, can you do that? See the darker yellow? LOL
>> You infantry mortality rate IS HIGHER than Italy's, but, hey, you did
>> better
>> than Albany.
>
> Italy: Infant mortality rate: total: 5.51 deaths/1,000 live births
> Ireland: Infant mortality rate: total: 5.05 deaths/1,000 live births
>
> From the CIA world factbook. What is that you're babbling rubber dick,
> is it a CIA conspiracy against Italy?
AHAHAHA The CIA World factbook... Well, you have to trust the CIA!!!
Sorry, TOOL, I don't really give a fuck about your love for the CIA. Join it
if you like it that much.
Here you can find some United Nations / UNICEF ( you know what UNICEF is ? )
data which is obviously more accurate:
http://globalis.gvu.unu.edu/indicator_detail.cfm?country=IT&indicatorid=25
http://globalis.gvu.unu.edu/indicator_detail.cfm?country=IE&indicatorid=25
Ireland has always been WORSE than Italy in the Infant Mortality Rate ( not
only at that, for the matter ).
>> It's well known here Trapattoni does miracles, his latest was turning
>> Irish
>> monkeys into football players.
>
> Who was Irish manager in 1994 when Houghton stuffed ye in the US at
> that minority sport again? What multiple of our population do you have
> again?
Sooner or later everyone gets lucky at Soccer. It's part of the game. What I
find amusing is that, winning Italy over 1-0 at the US World Cup made it as
one of the biggest events happening in Ireland in 1994, along with the
obvious and usual stuff about the IRA killing random people.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994_in_Ireland
It must be really entertaining living there. Probably that's why you are so
fucked up.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/24/2009 9:32:35 AM
|
|
On May 24, 9:43 am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> But you're one illiterate fucking mick with a very low IQ, no culture and
> laughable knowledge of English! So the fact YOU didn't know about it,
> doesn't mean it doesn exist.
>
> "Clear as the sun"
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22clear+as+the+sun%22&aq=f&oq
>
> 211,000 hits on Google.
Again you're using Google matches as evidence. And you don't even know
what an asshole Dick that makes you look.
> George Washington, 1774: "clear as the sun in its meridian brightness".
>
> It's in the ENGLISH DICTIONARY:
>
> http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/clear
And the example there?
"Fair as the moon, clear as the sun. --Canticles vi. 10. "
That's great, a million year old reference to a poem (not an idiom)
that doesn't even mean "obvious" like you were trying to say. Do you
really think a line of a poem that means something completely
different to what you are trying to say can back you up Dickturd?
> http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/clear
>
> Read, illiterate mick, read... English, the language of England, the nation
> that owned your ass throughout history...
>
> WRONG again...( #2 )
>
Fucked yourself #2. See above. Part of a poem, not an idiom and
doesn't mean "obvious" in the example YOU gave.
> > Walk into a bar here and ask for beer and see what you get. It won't
> > be Guinness. It's might be Nasty Ass-uro or some other pigwank.
>
> Who gives a fuck whether the average pub owner in Mickland is an illiterate
> dumb fuck just as you. I don't give a shit, I don't have to live there among
> illiterate micks, thank god.
As illiterate as a guy who uses 200 year old pieces of poems that
don't even mean what he's trying to say, Dickrub?
> Danny Boy Tool, evidence, evidence, evidence ... You pretend others have
> been abused, but you're the only one here talking about measuring his own
> dick, his girlfriend calling him a deformed monster, repeatedly doing
> references to sodomy, dildo's and other tools that belong either in the
> world of an horny gay or father O'Grady's.
You're the guy who mentions pedophiles in every post he makes. What
are you trying to suggest exactly by constantly referring to
pedophiles? Are you trying to tell us something subtly, Rubber
Dickrub?
> > Do you get all your joke from children's TV? No, some children's TV is
> > entertaining.
>
> AHAHAHAHAAH... You basically admit what you do all day long is watching
> children TV, so if my jokes were on children TV, you would have heard them.
OK, so you've proven again you can't read Dickrubber. How does "some
children's TV is entertaining" equal "what you do all day long is
watching children TV". I mean, what the fuck? Are you such a Dick
Rubbing asshole you think those mean the same thing?
> Unfortunately you can move, yes, like all the other micks who come as
> tourists here to finally watch some culture, monuments and stuff that, of
> course, is not present in a land with no relevant history like mickland.
Oh, yeah, Ireland has no tourists. Are you fucking kidding me? We're
tripping over them, and since we don't have any great monuments or
anything they must be coming because we're nice people, which anybody
on earth will tell you is the exact opposite of a holiday in Italy.
See the sights, eat the food, avoid the slimy thieving locals at all
fucking cost.
Yes, you've lots of relevant history, don't you. You invented
"fascist" after all. I'm quite happy to give your fucking brilliant
country credit for that, well done.
> And I agree with my government about Gypsies 100%. If you love Gypsies so
> much, I suggest you to go live near a Gypsies camp with your family in Rome.
> You thought I was ashamed of my government because of that? Fucking no.
Oh good, you admitted you're a racist scum Dick. That'll get you even
more friends than being a stupid aggressive illogical fuckface.
> You should be proud of father O'Grady, as you have a lot in common, first
> of all, you're both micks, secondly you're both two disgusting losers.
The pedophile thing, AGAIN? You can tell us about it Dickrub, whatever
your problem is. We won't laugh anymore than we are already I
promise. ;-)
> You should. Ireland makes the news in other countries for a ) Pedo priests
> raping children b ) Fucking IRA terrorists blowing women and children with
> bombs. For the rest, you never hear about Ireland in the news, probably
> because nothing really relevant happens in that country. So, you should be
> worried about the great Irish heritage the world gets from the news.
What's your place famous for again? Fascists and the Mafia. Well done,
and you've managed to export both of those around the world, thanks.
> No, that's YOUR theory, mick.
Nope, you came up with that earlier when you wanted to call me
homosexual.
> Oh, yes, I did two mistakes. First I said that Ireland is the country in
> Europe with the lowest IQ ever, but I should have said, to be correct, that
> Ireland is the only *rich* country in Europe with such a bloody low IQ.
So, let's get this straight, if you'd said something other than
bullshit you wouldn't have made a mistake?
That's pretty accurate I guess.
> That doesn't change the fact Ireland has a fucking low IQ, lower than Italy
> and lower than England, the country that owns a chunk of your land - for a
> good reason, as it seems.
We kicked them out of the rest of the place. When the fascists you're
so proud of got their butts kicked nobody even bothered to fight over
your third world dump, did they?
> Secondly, I said that the infantry death rate in Great Britain is higher
> than Italy, has shown in this document:
Yes, you fucked up. As in you are a fuck up. This has long since been
established.
> You said I was wrong, because Ireland is not part of Great Britain. Ok, I
> was wrong, but still, Ireland rate is the same as Great Britain, so actually
> higher than Italy's. Your utter idiocy about Italians being better at
> killing babies more than micks is an UTTER NONSENSE, dissed also by many
> studies and among these, the one above made by the Columbia university. Oh,
> but you claim you read that on a CIA document. Bring this document on,
> otherwise SHUT THE FUCK UP.
Do you have a problem using google? OK, you've probably a lot of
problems in your life... sore ass, constantly tripping over,
dribbling, but even "cia italy" gets it. Too complicated I guess for a
"smart" guy who "knows so much about computers".
> See? In this sole post you have been proven WRONG ***every single time ***
Er, count 'em loser.
> and made an ass out of yourself ***every single time*** . You can go on
> with the "Dick Rubber" stuff - which doesn't offend me at all, because it's
> so childish I find it actually funny
Haha, getting to you is it, Rubber Dick? Or do you prefer Dickrub? You
think "Tool" is mature? Not that I give a shit, but you're making a
fuckwad of yourself yet again saying I'm being childish when you're
doing the same fucking thing Dick.
> you have not made an ass out of yourself, that you have no clue about what
> "as clear as the sun" means in your own language so it doesn't exist,
In the example you gave it doesn't mean "obvious", so you don't know
what it means Dick.
> you
> have no clue that stout is a particular beer so it's not beer, and on and on
> and on... Danny Boy, keep going. Nobody knew who you are before you begun to
> flame, now everybody knows you're just one sick and stupid fuck.
Haha, and you probably thought you were some sort of flame champ you
loser Rubbing Dick buttfucked poverty ass fascist wannabe.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/24/2009 12:13:42 PM
|
|
On May 24, 9:51=A0am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> Boston, More Than a Feeling:
>
Was this post specifically designed to make you look an even bigger
Dick? Boston lyrics? WTF?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/24/2009 12:14:52 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:66a79c73-e019-4639-9f65-4a44531182e8@o18g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
On May 24, 9:51 am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> Boston, More Than a Feeling:
>
>Was this post specifically designed to make you look an even bigger
> Dick? Boston lyrics? WTF?
Boston lyrics, yeah, from a song that has been sold in MILLION copies,
making you even an utter fool for being THE ONLY ONE who's never heard the
idiom "clear as the sun" before !!!
You have been OWNED, mick. Accept it, or either join the IRA and blow your
guts off in Belfast in some kami-cunt rampage, doing a favour to us all.
AHAHAHAHAHAH
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/24/2009 1:19:53 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:f70a1ce9-58e9-4f93-92c1-f1101c207e82@i6g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
> On May 24, 9:43 am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> But you're one illiterate fucking mick with a very low IQ, no culture and
>> laughable knowledge of English! So the fact YOU didn't know about it,
>> doesn't mean it doesn exist.
>>
>> "Clear as the sun"
>>
>> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22clear+as+the+sun%22&aq=f&oq
>>
>> 211,000 hits on Google.
>
> Again you're using Google matches as evidence. And you don't even know
> what an asshole Dick that makes you look.
Saying that "clear as the sun" is a sentence that doesn't exist in English
and then finding 211.000 hits on Google... You don't even know what an
asshole illiterate fuck THAT makes YOU look, poor irish turd.
Let's go on...
>> George Washington, 1774: "clear as the sun in its meridian brightness".
>>
>> It's in the ENGLISH DICTIONARY:
>>
>> http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/clear
>
> And the example there?
> "Fair as the moon, clear as the sun. --Canticles vi. 10. "
>
> That's great, a million year old reference to a poem (not an idiom)
> that doesn't even mean "obvious" like you were trying to say. Do you
> really think a line of a poem that means something completely
> different to what you are trying to say can back you up Dickturd?
WOW!!! Talk about shooting yourself in the fucking foot! You willingly
ignore the George Washington quote, but, hey, who the fuck is George
Washington? Some Guinness worker? You micks never cease to amaze me with
your UTTER ignorance - did I say UTTER ignorance?
Let's proceed to the big surprise...
>> http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/clear
>>
>> Read, illiterate mick, read... English, the language of England, the
>> nation
>> that owned your ass throughout history...
>>
>> WRONG again...( #2 )
>>
>
> Fucked yourself #2. See above. Part of a poem, not an idiom and
> doesn't mean "obvious" in the example YOU gave.
http://books.google.com/books?id=7PMZJqSR4sAC&pg=PA102&lpg=PA102&dq=proverb+%22clear+as+the+sun%22&source=bl&ots=ARgqJCQuY2&sig=QIDaAqJfxx64Pluq7_tZfI8eCSE&hl=en&ei=PDoZSsLIKoiN_Qbt173mDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1
Wordsworth Dictionary of Proverbs, TOOL. Go back to English school!
And, wait, the sentence "clear as the sun", appears on 1,110 BOOKS on Google
Books alone, you smelly TOOL!
http://books.google.com/books?q=%22clear+as+the+sun%22
Among these, it occurs in the Handbook of Idiomatic English - wait, isn't
that what you were asking for, TOOL ? An IDIOMATIC reference?
http://books.google.com/books?id=_hQoAAAAMAAJ&q=%22clear+as+the+sun%22+idiom*&dq=%22clear+as+the+sun%22+idiom*&pgis=1
"As clear as the sun at noonday".
Fucking ignorant mick, all you're good at is getting smashed drinking beer -
oh, sorry, STOUT - at some fucking St. Patrick festival. You really have no
other talent than getting drunk! LOL
>> > Walk into a bar here and ask for beer and see what you get. It won't
>> > be Guinness. It's might be Nasty Ass-uro or some other pigwank.
>>
>> Who gives a fuck whether the average pub owner in Mickland is an
>> illiterate
>> dumb fuck just as you. I don't give a shit, I don't have to live there
>> among
>> illiterate micks, thank god.
>
> As illiterate as a guy who uses 200 year old pieces of poems that
> don't even mean what he's trying to say, Dickrub?
Shut up, mick! Every guy from USA and England here got what "clear as the
sun" means. And do you really believe Boston used that in "More than a
feeling" to pay a tribute to a 200 year old poem, or just because what
"clear as the sun" means is "clear as the sun" to everybody but you?
Fuckhead, just shut the fuck up. The whole deal about me using this
sentence - which speaks a lot how pointless was this flame of yours from
starters - has been dismantled, destroyed, pissed on it and flushed down the
toilet. CASE CLOSED... And you LOST IT.
>> Danny Boy Tool, evidence, evidence, evidence ... You pretend others have
>> been abused, but you're the only one here talking about measuring his own
>> dick, his girlfriend calling him a deformed monster, repeatedly doing
>> references to sodomy, dildo's and other tools that belong either in the
>> world of an horny gay or father O'Grady's.
>
> You're the guy who mentions pedophiles in every post he makes. What
> are you trying to suggest exactly by constantly referring to
> pedophiles? Are you trying to tell us something subtly, Rubber
> Dickrub?
No, I am just trying to say, talking of father O'Grady, that you micks made
the news outiside Ireland because of child abuse made by priests and women
and children killings made by IRA. This is what your country is known for
outside your little green world of . Oh, and for the usual accidents and
fuck-ups happening when you get smashed at some St. Patrick's festival.
There's not much else to know about Ireland or coming out from Ireland.
Wait, there is something else coming out of Ireland: losers like Danny The
Tool. Coming out like a poop out of a dog's ass.
>> > Do you get all your joke from children's TV? No, some children's TV is
>> > entertaining.
>>
>> AHAHAHAHAAH... You basically admit what you do all day long is watching
>> children TV, so if my jokes were on children TV, you would have heard
>> them.
>
> OK, so you've proven again you can't read Dickrubber. How does "some
> children's TV is entertaining" equal "what you do all day long is
> watching children TV". I mean, what the fuck? Are you such a Dick
> Rubbing asshole you think those mean the same thing?
Try again mick! It was hilarious what a complete fool I made of yourself out
of that sentence, BWAHAHAHAHA
>> Unfortunately you can move, yes, like all the other micks who come as
>> tourists here to finally watch some culture, monuments and stuff that, of
>> course, is not present in a land with no relevant history like mickland.
>
> Oh, yeah, Ireland has no tourists. Are you fucking kidding me? We're
> tripping over them, and since we don't have any great monuments or
> anything they must be coming because we're nice people, which anybody
> on earth will tell you is the exact opposite of a holiday in Italy.
Yeah, I think everybody here, after having read your pointless flame and
your UTTER IGNORANCE - you don't even know that STOUT is BEER - is thrilled
about going to Ireland and messing with guys of your LOW KIND. LOL
> See the sights, eat the food, avoid the slimy thieving locals at all
> fucking cost.
> Yes, you've lots of relevant history, don't you. You invented
> "fascist" after all. I'm quite happy to give your fucking brilliant
> country credit for that, well done.
We invented fascism just as we invented Leonardo Da Vinci. You invented St.
Patrick and Guinness. Those are very nice inventions, great to have an
excuse to get drunk and take a piss - you know, living the average day of
the average mick.
>> And I agree with my government about Gypsies 100%. If you love Gypsies so
>> much, I suggest you to go live near a Gypsies camp with your family in
>> Rome.
>> You thought I was ashamed of my government because of that? Fucking no.
>
> Oh good, you admitted you're a racist scum Dick. That'll get you even
> more friends than being a stupid aggressive illogical fuckface.
I am not here to make friends, I am here to speak about Commodore computers.
I am racist, so what? In democracy, I have every fucking right to be racist
or whatever.
>> You should be proud of father O'Grady, as you have a lot in common,
>> first
>> of all, you're both micks, secondly you're both two disgusting losers.
>
> The pedophile thing, AGAIN? You can tell us about it Dickrub, whatever
> your problem is. We won't laugh anymore than we are already I
> promise. ;-)
When you say We you mean you and your uncle O'Grady, right? You micks,
always siding with each other, even in your most efferate actions. I tell
you what my problem is with your uncle O'Grady: I'd wish he'd be torched in
public, like all the many other Irish priests who are child abusers and that
make the news here.
>> You should. Ireland makes the news in other countries for a ) Pedo
>> priests
>> raping children b ) Fucking IRA terrorists blowing women and children
>> with
>> bombs. For the rest, you never hear about Ireland in the news, probably
>> because nothing really relevant happens in that country. So, you should
>> be
>> worried about the great Irish heritage the world gets from the news.
>
> What's your place famous for again? Fascists and the Mafia. Well done,
> and you've managed to export both of those around the world, thanks.
Italy is famous for fascists and Mafia? Fascists were here 80 years ago, so
it seems you don't listen that much to the news, probably you still use
grandpa's radio. And Mafia... Mafia is just a name given to organized crime,
which plagues every country. But organized crime doesn't originate in Italy,
only, do you really want to make an ass out of yourself claiming the Russian
Mafia, the Yakuza originate in Italy? ROTFL
>> No, that's YOUR theory, mick.
>
> Nope, you came up with that earlier when you wanted to call me
> homosexual.
You act like a fruit, speak like a fruit, we all jumped to the conclusion
you are a fruit. But hey, I don't have a problem with that, you can be as
gay as you like, join parades and stuff. It doesn't bother me. Even if
you're gay that the least of your problems: being an illiterate, smartass
dumb fuck is on top of the list, instead.
>> Oh, yes, I did two mistakes. First I said that Ireland is the country in
>> Europe with the lowest IQ ever, but I should have said, to be correct,
>> that
>> Ireland is the only *rich* country in Europe with such a bloody low IQ.
>
> So, let's get this straight, if you'd said something other than
> bullshit you wouldn't have made a mistake?
> That's pretty accurate I guess.
This text above, you're desperately trying to pull yourself out of this mess
with, means really nothing and it still can't hide the fact Ireland is the
single rich country in whole Europe - Greece and Croatia qualify as poor
countries with poor education systems - with the LOWEST IQ average. You have
good schools, you have money, how come you micks qualify as being the
dumbest of the bunch? Can you please explain that ? Why are you left so
behind as far as intelligence goes?
>> That doesn't change the fact Ireland has a fucking low IQ, lower than
>> Italy
>> and lower than England, the country that owns a chunk of your land - for
>> a
>> good reason, as it seems.
>
> We kicked them out of the rest of the place.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...You micks can't get along with each other over
religion, that's why you got to live separated, and a chunk of your
territory is a colony of Great Britain because of that. To be honest, it
would make more sense if you were torn apart over a Guinness issue, rather
than religion, but hey, it's micks and their friendly attitude we're talking
about here.
> When the fascists you're
> so proud of got their butts kicked nobody even bothered to fight over
> your third world dump, did they?
AHAHAHAHA... Do you have history books in mickland? And tell me something,
do these books touch any topic that is not St. Patrick or "STOUT" ? LOL.
Everybody who got an elementary education in history in Europe ( or outside
Europe, that is ) knows pretty well Italy went through a civil war, between
fascists and partesans, called Resistence, which lasted from 1943 until the
end of the war. You don't know about it, Mr. " 'clear as the sun' doesn't
exist in English ", because you're an illiterate mick, and a TOOL. You
probably didn't even finish high school - and that didn't help you out with
your endemically low IQ, I suspect.
>> Secondly, I said that the infantry death rate in Great Britain is higher
>> than Italy, has shown in this document:
>
> Yes, you fucked up. As in you are a fuck up. This has long since been
> established.
Everybody fucks up, you mother did too. See, she probably was catholic and
against abortion, but she should have considered doing it. Now Ireland would
have one embarassing fool less.
>> You said I was wrong, because Ireland is not part of Great Britain. Ok, I
>> was wrong, but still, Ireland rate is the same as Great Britain, so
>> actually
>> higher than Italy's. Your utter idiocy about Italians being better at
>> killing babies more than micks is an UTTER NONSENSE, dissed also by many
>> studies and among these, the one above made by the Columbia university.
>> Oh,
>> but you claim you read that on a CIA document. Bring this document on,
>> otherwise SHUT THE FUCK UP.
>
> Do you have a problem using google? OK, you've probably a lot of
> problems in your life... sore ass, constantly tripping over,
> dribbling, but even "cia italy" gets it. Too complicated I guess for a
> "smart" guy who "knows so much about computers".
Ahahaha... "CIA Italy". I wonder since when CIA is an expert on infant
mortality rate? God only knows where the CIA took those numbers. UNICEF, the
United Nations Children's Fund, lists your country up in the scale than
Italy, so do the Columbia university and other non governamental
organizations. Now, since UNICEF's activities are all about children, don't
get me wrong if I find their numbers more relevant than CIA's, whose main
activities are hiding the truth from the public eye and fucking up the world
meanwhile.
And, anyway, this is really a poor man's war, because Ireland and Italy are
pretty close anyway in the mortality rate figures. So close, it's a
competition that doesn't really make ANY sense. To conclude this useless
topic, the mortality rate of children in Italy and Ireland has nothing to do
with Commodore and the C65 and, in itself, proves absolutely NOTHING.
>> See? In this sole post you have been proven WRONG ***every single time
>> ***
>
> Er, count 'em loser.
AHAHA, I DID! And everybody can read my original message and count it! I
even put numbers, but it seems you can just count up to three. Too bad!
BWAHAHA Hey, Danny, maybe the number four doesn't exist, because you have
never heard of it before. Maybe we will find the number four on some books
of Arab idioms? ROTFL
>> and made an ass out of yourself ***every single time*** . You can go on
>> with the "Dick Rubber" stuff - which doesn't offend me at all, because
>> it's
>> so childish I find it actually funny
>
> Haha, getting to you is it, Rubber Dick? Or do you prefer Dickrub? You
> think "Tool" is mature? Not that I give a shit, but you're making a
> fuckwad of yourself yet again saying I'm being childish when you're
> doing the same fucking thing Dick.
Danny Boy Tool, you make me laugh and laugh and laugh good. You are losing
and going down like a hopeless turd flushed down the toilet bowl, and still
you have the guts to try to reply! Keep doing that, it's getting uglier and
uglier, you replies are more hopeless than ever and I am getting great
pleasure and satisfaction making you look like a complete fool over and over
again. Keep going, TOOL!
>> you have not made an ass out of yourself, that you have no clue about
>> what
>> "as clear as the sun" means in your own language so it doesn't exist,
>
> In the example you gave it doesn't mean "obvious", so you don't know
> what it means Dick.
"Clear as the sun" means "clear as the sun". It's completely
self-explanatory. I gave you many and many examples, links to idiomatic
English books, George Washington's quotes, proverb books, dictionary
books... Still you pretend I didn't and that it doesn't exist. Wait I copy
them all over again here, so maybe the TRUTH you DON'T HAVE A POINT and that
you LOST THIS ARGUMENT SHAMEFULLY goes deep through your thick skull bones,
filling all the vacuum inside:
http://books.google.com/books?id=7PMZJqSR4sAC&pg=PA102&lpg=PA102&dq=proverb+%22clear+as+the+sun%22&source=bl&ots=ARgqJCQuY2&sig=QIDaAqJfxx64Pluq7_tZfI8eCSE&hl=en&ei=PDoZSsLIKoiN_Qbt173mDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1
Wordsworth Dictionary of Proverbs, TOOL. Go back to English school, MICK!
Among these, it occurs in the Handbook of Idiomatic English - wait, isn't
that what you were asking for, TOOL ? -
http://books.google.com/books?id=_hQoAAAAMAAJ&q=%22clear+as+the+sun%22+idiom*&dq=%22clear+as+the+sun%22+idiom*&pgis=1
And, wait, the sentence "clear as the sun", appears on 1,110 BOOKS on Google
Books alone, you smelly TOOL!
http://books.google.com/books?q=%22clear+as+the+sun%22
Put the guinness down and read some books, TOOL!!!
>> you
>> have no clue that stout is a particular beer so it's not beer, and on and
>> on
>> and on... Danny Boy, keep going. Nobody knew who you are before you begun
>> to
>> flame, now everybody knows you're just one sick and stupid fuck.
>
> Haha, and you probably thought you were some sort of flame champ you
> loser Rubbing Dick buttfucked poverty ass fascist wannabe.
I don't think I am a flame champion, *I know I am*. Your verbal diarrhea
doesn't even match my farts and you have been owned to an insulting degree.
Now go back to the pub and get smashed on your STOUT, like a mick say do,
TOOL!
BWAHAHAH...
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/24/2009 1:33:41 PM
|
|
On May 24, 10:32 am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> According to that book, Croatians and Greeks are stupid shits, true. But the
> book says their excuse is POVERTY, so not every people there has access to
> good schools and such, quite the contrary actually. The big question here
> then is: with Ireland, as it's no poor country, WHAT IS THE EXCUSE for such
> LOW IQ ?
The excuse is that the book is full of shit just like you are and if
you could read you'd see that nobody on earth except racist assholes
like you give a fuck about it.
> Please answer this question: why you micks have access to good schools, have
> the money still you have such a low IQ, one point higher to countries where
> the majority of people can't afford going to schools?
>
> Reply, Tool. I really would like you to explain this.
We obviously we want to make you feel bad, 'cos, ya know, we're all
really stupid but we're still way richer and more developed than your
third world mafia/fascist shitheap. Read the criticism bit at the end
of that wikipedia page Dickrub, EVERYBODY thinks that book is shit.
They made up most of the results FFS.
> Yes, you're the winner here, like you when you said "clear as the sun" is
> not an English expression, but I gave you examples from the Bible,
Which doesn't mean what you meant to say at all because you fucked up
as usual.
> quotes
> from George Washington
No, what *you* said was a nonsensical PART of *his* quote
> quotes from The Boston in "More Than a Feeling"
Again WTF? Wanna give us some Spice Girls or Timberlake lyrics next to
back up some fucked up theory of yours?
> - a
> song everyone and his sister knows about -, giving you links to proverb
> books, giving you links to dictionaries carrying it... Yes, TOOL. You also
> were winning when you claimed that STOUT IT'S NOT A BEER - ROTFL... Then,
> when facing the evidence of you being a clown, with every dictionary in the
> world saying STOUT IS A BEER, you backed off like a little shit, saying
> you're a poor mick and don't know shit. LOSER! Oh, wait, you were fucking me
> up when you said that Italy is better than Ireland in the IDR ( Infant Death
> Rate ), but I brought you a study made by the Columbia University that
> proves Ireland has an higher death rate than Italy.
Oh shit, you know what? Your data ends is for 2000. The CIA data is
for 2009. You know what that means Rubber Dick, don't you? You've
fucked up yet again and you are getting it right up the ass AGAIN.
What year is it in Italy? 2000AD? 0AD? Is there anything RIGHT FUCKING
NOW BITCH that you can use to show your dump isn't a useless mafia run
shithole?
> Enough? I am sure you
> will go on, because you micks can't just accept your inferiority, that's why
> you kill women and children in bombing, as "bravely" done by the cowards in
> IRA.
Cowards? From an Italian? The guys who only managed to beat Ethiopia
FFS in WWII and then spent the rest of the war looking for the best
guys to surrender to? Even the Germans got so sick of your chickenshit
asses they decided to mash you into the dirt. Keep giving us the
history lessons Rubber Dick,
> I might have been superficial, but the facts don't change. Ireland is the
> *rich* country with the lowest IQ in Europe, and since it's rich, the
> average dumb mick has no excuse about being an illiterate fuck,
If you want to check, (oh, you don't, 'cos it' buttfuck time for you
again when you do)
Italy: Literacy: total population: 98.4%
Ireland: Literacy: total population: 99%
Wow, funny that huh, you illiterate nation of fucking idiots.
> I made a mistake with saying
> Ireland is in Great Britain, but still Ireland has the same high infant
> death rate, higher than Italy, and I wonder why, maybe all your doctors are
> busy getting smashed at the pub on Guinness while babies die?
Except it doesn't, which means you get buttfucked, by yourself.
Congrats.
> AHAHAHA The CIA World factbook... Well, you have to trust the CIA!!!
>
> Sorry, TOOL, I don't really give a fuck about your love for the CIA. Join it
> if you like it that much.
>
> Here you can find some United Nations / UNICEF ( you know what UNICEF is ? )
> data which is obviously more accurate:
>
> http://globalis.gvu.unu.edu/indicator_detail.cfm?country=IT&indicator...
>
> http://globalis.gvu.unu.edu/indicator_detail.cfm?country=IE&indicator...
>
> Ireland has always been WORSE than Italy in the Infant Mortality Rate ( not
> only at that, for the matter ).
Always? I know you are pretty backward over there in Italy, what, with
the crushing poverty and all, but it's 2009 there just like the rest
of the world, right? Your data here says *2002* at the bottom. My data
is *2009*. Living in the past again Rubber Dick? Right now bitch,
which country has the highest IDM? And apparently you had a 2000 year
head start and have loads of "smart" guys over there. Where did it all
go wrong Dickrub?
> Sooner or later everyone gets lucky at Soccer. It's part of the game. What I
> find amusing is that, winning Italy over 1-0 at the US World Cup made it as
> one of the biggest events happening in Ireland in 1994, along with the
> obvious and usual stuff about the IRA killing random people.
Whereas Italians kill people a bit more specifically, like Jews, gays
and gypsies that you ship of to die in Germany. Well done on that by
the way, you even chickened out of murdering them yourselves.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/24/2009 2:29:54 PM
|
|
On May 24, 2:19=A0pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> <daniel.oto...@ucd.ie> wrote in message
>
> news:66a79c73-e019-4639-9f65-4a44531182e8@o18g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
> On May 24, 9:51 am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>
> >> Boston, More Than a Feeling:
>
> >Was this post specifically designed to make you look an even bigger
> > Dick? Boston lyrics? WTF?
>
> Boston lyrics, yeah, from a song that has been sold in MILLION copies,
I couldn't even be bothered to look up million sellers that are a pile
of shit, but I don't have to as we all know they're out there so who
gives a fuck what some band said?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/24/2009 2:35:23 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:a1a07522-aaab-41f4-b0e3-2804d5777ee7@y9g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...
>> Boston lyrics, yeah, from a song that has been sold in MILLION copies,
>
>I couldn't even be bothered to look up million sellers that are a pile of
>shit, but I don't have to as we all know they're out there so who gives a
>fuck what some band said?
You can call Boston a shit band, you can say all those who like Boston are
idiots... All you poor attempts reversing this obvious truth are both
laughable and irrelevant. If you have not heard "More Than a Feeling" by
Boston you either have been living on the Moon or in some pit latrine.
But of course you did hear it, as you did hear "clear as the sun" before,
it's just that you're a fucking liar and you don't want to admit you had NO
POINT WHATSOEVER from the start and you were FUCKING OWNED.
Keep it goin', looooooser!!!
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/24/2009 2:44:57 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:5706f2fa-5342-49f9-9f42-4f98832bd7b0@x5g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> On May 24, 10:32 am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> According to that book, Croatians and Greeks are stupid shits, true. But
>> the
>> book says their excuse is POVERTY, so not every people there has access
>> to
>> good schools and such, quite the contrary actually. The big question here
>> then is: with Ireland, as it's no poor country, WHAT IS THE EXCUSE for
>> such
>> LOW IQ ?
>
> The excuse is that the book is full of shit just like you are and if
[snip]
Wrong answer. Saying the book is shit doesn't work. Try again.
Why is that Ireland, among all rich countries in Europe, is the one with the
lowest IQ?
Answer if you dare, scumbag or the answer will be implicit: because Ireland
is made up of a bunch of illiterate, arrogant FUCKING TOOLS, just like you.
Why is that Ireland, among all rich countries in Europe, is the one with the
lowest IQ?
Danny O'Tool?
>> Yes, you're the winner here, like you when you said "clear as the sun" is
>> not an English expression, but I gave you examples from the Bible,
>
> Which doesn't mean what you meant to say at all because you fucked up
> as usual.
[snip]
I mean clear, and added "as the sun". It was self explanatory, but you want
to make a case out of it because YOU DON'T STAND A FUCKING CASE in this
whole thread, you stupid clown, so you are desperately trying something to
attach your drivel to, just to make less of an ass out of yourself. Let me
tell you something, Danny Boy Tool: it's not working, it has never worked
and it is not going to work.
The C65 discussion was gone a long ago, and obviously YOU LOST IT, and see
what we're discussing now, as the byproduct of your pitiful attempts for you
to save the face: you're disputing the fact Ireland's average IQ, which is
fucking LOW, is the LOWEST in Europe among "rich" countries, something that
is a proven FACT. Then you are claiming that dark piss you drink in
mickland, called Guinness is not a beer, but "Stout", whilst every
dictionary in the world lists "Stout" as beer, making an ass out of yourself
once again. More, you're claiming that "clear as the sun" is not a proper
english saying,when Proverb books, Idiomatic English books, 211,000 web
sites and over 1000 books on Google books alone, and even the Bible, carry
such expression, meaning that the "sun is clear"... Oh, and sorry, finally
you are claiming that Italy has an higher infant mortality, because Italy
scored 184th and Ireland scored 189th on the CIA World Factbook -WOW, what a
HUGE difference between Italy and the micks, maybe a "half baby" more dies
in Italy. Do you micks give birth to "half babies" ? Surely you micks give
birth to half brained morons, you being the living proof.
All the rest is bollocks, sour grapes, third grade drivel and poor attempts
at saving the face. You lost this flame days ago, and you would have better
headed for the showers, rather than emabarassing yourself even more. YOU ARE
DONE, OWNED just like Northern Ireland. Accept the truth, accept your
inferiority and FUCK OFF
BWAHAHAHA, FUCKING TOOL :-)
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/24/2009 3:05:39 PM
|
|
On May 24, 2:33 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> Saying that "clear as the sun" is a sentence
It's *not* a sentence. Where's the capital letter at the start of it
if it's a sentence? Where's the subject?
> that doesn't exist in English
> and then finding 211.000 hits on Google... You don't even know what an
> asshole illiterate fuck THAT makes YOU look, poor irish turd.
It's a string of words that have been used by somebody, that doesn't
automatically make it an expression Dickrub.
> > That's great, a million year old reference to a poem (not an idiom)
> > that doesn't even mean "obvious" like you were trying to say. Do you
> > really think a line of a poem that means something completely
> > different to what you are trying to say can back you up Dickturd?
>
> WOW!!! Talk about shooting yourself in the fucking foot! You willingly
> ignore the George Washington quote, but, hey, who the fuck is George
> Washington? Some Guinness worker? You micks never cease to amaze me with
> your UTTER ignorance - did I say UTTER ignorance?
"clear as the sun in its meridian brightness."
That's what Washington said. You didn't use that phrase, though did
you? You only used the first bit, which makes no sense and isn't a
phrase on it's own, and then fucked up royally when you tried to back
it up with a quote about skin complexion. What the fuck are you on,
Rubber Dick?
> > Fucked yourself #2. See above. Part of a poem, not an idiom and
> > doesn't mean "obvious" in the example YOU gave.
>
> http://books.google.com/books?id=7PMZJqSR4sAC&pg=PA102&lpg=PA102&dq=p...
>
> Wordsworth Dictionary of Proverbs, TOOL. Go back to English school!
Wow, you got ONE out of 210,000 to match what you were trying to say.
I guess like the Irish soccer team, everybody gets lucky sometimes.
Pity every other usage you can find renders your "clear as the sun"
either incomplete as a phrase or actually leaves it meaning something
completely different, huh? 1 out of 210,000?
> And, wait, the sentence "clear as the sun", appears on 1,110 BOOKS on Google
> Books alone, you smelly TOOL!
>
> http://books.google.com/books?q=%22clear+as+the+sun%22
That's great, but I've already shown you those phrases aren't the same
as yours which makes no sense or else they mean something else than
what you were trying to say. Do you commonly use English phrases by
only saying the first half and having it mean something completely
different to what you're trying to say? Fuck, your literacy at Italian
in your shithole is pretty bad so what would I expect of your English.
> Among these, it occurs in the Handbook of Idiomatic English - wait, isn't
> that what you were asking for, TOOL ? An IDIOMATIC reference?
>
> http://books.google.com/books?id=_hQoAAAAMAAJ&q=%22clear+as+the+sun%2...
http://books.google.com/books?id=_hQoAAAAMAAJ&q=%22clear+as+the+sun%22+idiom*&dq=%22clear+as+the+sun%22+idiom*&pgis=1
I tried that link, why oh why did I expect anything other than more of
your bullshit Rubber Dick
"Your search - "clear as the sun" idiom* - did not match any
documents. "
That's some fucking fantastic evidence you've dug up there Dickrub.
> "As clear as the sun at noonday".
Which isn't the phrase you used, unfortunately. Come back to me when
history changes and your country isn't a shithole and "As clear as the
sun at noonday" is the phrase you actually used.
> > As illiterate as a guy who uses 200 year old pieces of poems that
> > don't even mean what he's trying to say, Dickrub?
>
> Shut up, mick! Every guy from USA and England here got what "clear as the
> sun" means.
Ah, but that's something different isn't it? That doesn't make it
proper English or else you'd realise if you ask for beer in an Irish
bar you'd get a Smithwicks or something. FUCKED UP ROYALLY YET AGAIN
DICKRUB.
> And do you really believe Boston used that in "More than a
> feeling" to pay a tribute to a 200 year old poem, or just because what
> "clear as the sun" means is "clear as the sun" to everybody but you?
Maybe we should ask Abba or Madonna what the proper use of the phrase
is then you fucking numpty Dick.
> Fuckhead, just shut the fuck up. The whole deal about me using this
> sentence - which speaks a lot how pointless was this flame of yours from
> starters - has been dismantled, destroyed, pissed on it and flushed down the
> toilet. CASE CLOSED... And you LOST IT.
Didn't use the phrase properly and tried to explain it as some sort of
make up description. Well done Dickhead.
> No, I am just trying to say, talking of father O'Grady, that you micks made
> the news outiside Ireland because of child abuse made by priests and women
> and children killings made by IRA. This is what your country is known for
> outside your little green world of . Oh, and for the usual accidents and
> fuck-ups happening when you get smashed at some St. Patrick's festival.
> There's not much else to know about Ireland or coming out from Ireland.
Who gives a shit what goes out of Ireland, all the money seems to come
in, doesn't it RubaDick? Well done on Googling Irish news. I'm glad
you love Ireland so much you're paying attention to how this proven
superior country is doing. You cavemen in your civilization in reverse
might learn something from the experts.
> > OK, so you've proven again you can't read Dickrubber. How does "some
> > children's TV is entertaining" equal "what you do all day long is
> > watching children TV". I mean, what the fuck? Are you such a Dick
> > Rubbing asshole you think those mean the same thing?
>
> Try again mick! It was hilarious what a complete fool I made of yourself out
> of that sentence, BWAHAHAHAHA
Er, no it wasn't. Don't kid yourself. You simply fucked up and make
some shit up out of nowhere and were caught by the rocks doing it. On
planet earth, when you're caught red handed making shit up like you do
it's you that's supposed to feel like the asshole, but you're from
Italy so you're probably too busy hunting rats or whatever to care
about shit like that.
> Yeah, I think everybody here, after having read your pointless flame and
> your UTTER IGNORANCE - you don't even know that STOUT is BEER - is thrilled
> about going to Ireland and messing with guys of your LOW KIND. LOL
Stout is stout. You said yourself that the common usage is all that is
required, yeah Rubber Dick? Thanks for that.
> We invented fascism just as we invented Leonardo Da Vinci. You invented St.
> Patrick and Guinness. Those are very nice inventions, great to have an
> excuse to get drunk and take a piss - you know, living the average day of
> the average mick.
And you shat that 2000 years of history down the toilet so now you're
not even as good as us low IQ alco Micks. Hahahah.
> I am not here to make friends, I am here to speak about Commodore computers.
> I am racist, so what? In democracy, I have every fucking right to be racist
> or whatever.
No you're not. If you wanted to speak about C= you'd say something
about C= LIKE I FUCKING DID RUBBER DICK instead of calling peoples
opinions laughable and spouting shit about sour grapes (where was the
proof for that again? Oh, you just made it up out of thin air. Well I
guess that's all you poor fuckers have to make stuff out of over
there)
> When you say We you mean you and your uncle O'Grady, right? You micks,
> always siding with each other,
Yeah, siding with your own is something a slimy cheating Italian bitch
would NEVER do.
> even in your most efferate actions. I tell
> you what my problem is with your uncle O'Grady: I'd wish he'd be torched in
> public, like all the many other Irish priests who are child abusers and that
> make the news here.
Yeah, me too. I still amn't sure what your fixation is with pedophiles
though. Did you have an Irish priest when you were a kid or what?
> Italy is famous for fascists and Mafia? Fascists were here 80 years ago,
1943 is 80 years ago? Again Rubber Dick, what fucking year is it in
your cave exactly?
> so
> it seems you don't listen that much to the news, probably you still use
> grandpa's radio. And Mafia... Mafia is just a name given to organized crime,
> which plagues every country. But organized crime doesn't originate in Italy,
> only, do you really want to make an ass out of yourself claiming the Russian
> Mafia, the Yakuza originate in Italy? ROTFL
Oh boo fucking hoo. What are you, the Mafia press agency? The Mafia
are as synonymous with Italy as you fucking your sister or chickening
from a fight.
> > So, let's get this straight, if you'd said something other than
> > bullshit you wouldn't have made a mistake?
> > That's pretty accurate I guess.
>
> This text above, you're desperately trying to pull yourself out of this mess
You fuck up, you admit you fuck up, and then *I'm* trying to get
myself out of a mess? HAHAHA.
> > We kicked them out of the rest of the place.
>
> AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...You micks can't get along with each other over
> religion,
OK, so you've proven you know nothing about it. You can go read
*anything* about it and come back. Oh, wait, you're in an illierate
shithole, so you probably don't read so good no how.
> Everybody who got an elementary education in history in Europe ( or outside
> Europe, that is ) knows pretty well Italy went through a civil war, between
> fascists and partesans, called Resistence, which lasted from 1943 until the
> end of the war.
How convenient that this "civil war" happily coincided with a few
million allied troops landing and kicking your army's ass. The Italian
army was fucked up from every direction by Germans, Poles, blacks, US,
Russkis... you name it. But hey, they really showed Ethiopia didn't
they. (until they got fucked out of there too)
> Everybody fucks up, you mother <yadda yadda>
OK, you fucked up big time, you don't have to cry yourself to sleep
over it. ;-)
> And, anyway, this is really a poor man's war, because Ireland and Italy are
> pretty close anyway in the mortality rate figures. So close, it's a
> competition that doesn't really make ANY sense.
Why do I get the feeling somebody wants out of this particular fight?
What years are your data from caveDick?
> "Clear as the sun" means "clear as the sun". It's completely
> self-explanatory. I gave you many and many examples
Self explanatory as in you give 1000s of irrelavant google matches to
different phrases that mean something completely different? What does
all this have to do with how pretty some bible bitch's face is
Dickrub? You do know that's what your bible quote meant, don't you?
Nothing to do with "obvious" at all?
I feel an "Everybody fucks up" coming from you... boo hoo.
> I don't think I am a flame champion, *I know I am*.
And you're real smart because you said so. We get it. Pity about your
fucked up history, country, logic, English phrases and your pedophile
fetish, isn't it DickyRubby?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/24/2009 4:07:36 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:45b8d174-b937-4ea6-9bdb-bfc54cfc5cd4@y9g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...
> On May 24, 2:33 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> Saying that "clear as the sun" is a sentence
>
> It's *not* a sentence. Where's the capital letter at the start of it
> if it's a sentence? Where's the subject?
[snip]
O'TOOL, it is over... Accept it. "As clear as the sun" is an expression that
DOES exist in English and there are a zillion of references. You lost your
stupid illiteracy-driven argument.
This has been discussed 10 times already, and you lost it, if people are
interested they can go back and read my reply on the subject, I feel no need
to discuss it anymore.
So bye, bye Mr. "clear as the sun" doesn't exist in English, Stout is not
beer, Ireland saves a *half baby* more than Italy in the mortality rates so
it's much better to live in, we micks have the lowest IQ among rich
countries in Europe because a book is racist, we have the highest
concentration of child abusing priests in the World but Italians invented
fascism so we're even... Keep all your bullshit for the teabagging sessions
with your gay mick buddies at the pub, while getting smashed on your dark
piss stout. Or, better, join the IRA and blow yourself out killing some
other protestant mick children and women. You are unfit for anything that is
even remotely intelligent anyway.
Bwahahahaha... Danny the Tool still trying to save his face over lost
arguments...You are as pathetic as it gets, Danny boy.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/24/2009 4:18:27 PM
|
|
ANYWHO!!!!!
*runs*
I wonder how hard it would be to throw together a simple C65 emu in SDL?
Maybe getting away from the baroqueness of MESS would make it easier to
get a C65 emu that is a little more useful, not that the C65 was of very
much use without software...
-uso.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
lyricalnanoha
|
5/24/2009 4:22:46 PM
|
|
On May 24, 4:05 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> > The excuse is that the book is full of shit just like you are and if
>
> [snip]
>
> Wrong answer. Saying the book is shit doesn't work. Try again.
Wrong answer? Even half of that wikipedia page you're quoting from
says the book is full of shit. Nothing wrong with my answer at all.
> Why is that Ireland, among all rich countries in Europe, is the one with the
> lowest IQ?
>
> Answer if you dare, scumbag or the answer will be implicit: because Ireland
> is made up of a bunch of illiterate, arrogant FUCKING TOOLS, just like you.
>
> Why is that Ireland, among all rich countries in Europe, is the one with the
> lowest IQ?
Just did. The book is shit, everybody knows it's shit and the same
wikipedia page you're quoting from says it's shit.
> Danny O'Tool?
Er, Dick Rubber?
> I mean clear, and added "as the sun". It was self explanatory, but you want
> to make a case out of it because YOU DON'T STAND A FUCKING CASE in this
> whole thread, you stupid clown, so you are desperately trying something to
> attach your drivel to, just to make less of an ass out of yourself. Let me
> tell you something, Danny Boy Tool: it's not working, it has never worked
> and it is not going to work.
You said "clear as the sun", which isn't a proper phrase that anybody
except two guys in the entirety of history has used to mean "obvious".
Well done, you've become number three. The rest of what you are saying
is bullshit and doesn't affect that.
> The C65 discussion was gone a long ago, and obviously YOU LOST IT,
The only people who bothered to judge, you know, real people who post
things in this NG, agreed with me. Your evidence that I lost? Oh, you
said so. And you said you were smart so you must be right. Well done
on that.
> and see
> what we're discussing now, as the byproduct of your pitiful attempts for you
> to save the face: you're disputing the fact Ireland's average IQ, which is
> fucking LOW, is the LOWEST in Europe among "rich" countries, something that
> is a proven FACT.
Where is it a proven fact? Because a wikipedia page, which itself
states that the book is shit, says so? That's up to your usual
standard of evidence Rubber Dick.
> Then you are claiming that dark piss you drink in
> mickland, called Guinness is not a beer, but "Stout", whilst every
> dictionary in the world lists "Stout" as beer, making an ass out of yourself
> once again. More, you're claiming that "clear as the sun" is not a proper
> english saying,when Proverb books, Idiomatic English books, 211,000 web
> sites and over 1000 books on Google books alone, and even the Bible, carry
> such expression, meaning that the "sun is clear"...
No they don't. You managed ONE reference from 1700 (and one fucking
song lyric yee haw) that used your exact phrase to mean what you
wanted it to mean. Well done. Out of 211,000 examples apparently. All
the others showed you fucked up the phrase or you didn't know what it
meant. WELL FUCKING DONE SELF-FUCKER.
> Oh, and sorry, finally
> you are claiming that Italy has an higher infant mortality, because Italy
> scored 184th and Ireland scored 189th on the CIA World Factbook -WOW, what a
> HUGE difference between Italy and the micks, maybe a "half baby" more dies
> in Italy. Do you micks give birth to "half babies" ? Surely you micks give
> birth to half brained morons, you being the living proof.
Haha, is that another "everybody fucks up" I see right there? After
all your streams of 100% bullshit? If you're so fucking smart and your
IQ is so high why can't you beat us on something (fucking anything
actually) so important? Too busy digging old turnips out of bins for
dinner you poor ass poverty hole beggars?
> All the rest is bollocks, sour grapes,
Prove it. I've lost count now how many times I've said that. I've kept
count of how many times you've tried to answer: ZERO.
> third grade drivel and poor attempts
> at saving the face. You lost this flame days ago, and you would have better
> headed for the showers, rather than emabarassing yourself even more. YOU ARE
> DONE, OWNED just like Northern Ireland. Accept the truth, accept your
> inferiority and FUCK OFF
There you go again, trying to call it all off. Heat getting to you
Rubber Dick? Made one fuck up to many for your own liking?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/24/2009 4:24:05 PM
|
|
Here's another fact (look it up in the dictionary what that means) for
you rubber dick:
Italy: Popluation:60,017,677 Tourists per year:43,700,000
Ireland: Population:4,422,100 Tourists per year:8,000,000
Wow, that's nearly two tourists per person. Why does everybody love us
so much? It must be our sparkling personalities. We piss all over you
AGAIN. Now you'll probably tell us how many tourists the Romans had in
55BC or some other total bullshit. HAHAHA.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/24/2009 4:27:44 PM
|
|
On May 24, 5:22=A0pm, lyricalnanoha
<lyricalnan...@usotsuki.hoshinet.org> wrote:
> ANYWHO!!!!!
>
> *runs*
>
> I wonder how hard it would be to throw together a simple C65 emu in SDL?
> Maybe getting away from the baroqueness of MESS would make it easier to
> get a C65 emu that is a little more useful, not that the C65 was of very
> much use without software...
>
> -uso.
I'm sorry Rubini fucked this up for you. I made an objective comment
and he wanted to kick off with his "laughable opinions" and "sour
grapes" BS. And yes, I should know better too.
Start another thread and I'll keep out, promise.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/24/2009 4:36:27 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:06c5f383-eb54-4360-baad-412ce7de4ab3@k2g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
> On May 24, 4:05 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> > The excuse is that the book is full of shit just like you are and if
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> Wrong answer. Saying the book is shit doesn't work. Try again.
>
> Wrong answer? Even half of that wikipedia page you're quoting from
> says the book is full of shit. Nothing wrong with my answer at all.
It's the book that's racist, Danny Boy Tool! It is so obvious. It just can't
be you micks have the same average IQ of a pile of dung.
All the remaining bollocks you have posted has been already discussed, your
*cough* arguments have been dismantled and pissed on, and, as usual, you've
brought nothing new to the flame. Just your usual desperate tries to attach
your drivel to stupid shit, in the hopeless attempt to demonstrate this
people you're not my bitch. Well, sorry, Danny, you're my bitch and I own
your ass any time of day, bwahahaha....
Riccardo
Sorry, please read "shite" as you micks say, wherever I have written "shit".
You are able to say shit doesn't exist in English and eventually make a
flame out of it, or claim that "shite" is not "shit", just as you claimed
stout is not beer. With a fucking desperate and retarded mick like you, we
never know...
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/24/2009 4:37:05 PM
|
|
On May 24, 5:37=A0pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
yadda yadda Dickrub. Not even an attempt at logic there. You know the
insult stuff only really works then there's some new ass tearing
happening on the argument side, like I'm doing to you constantly? The
other stuff doesn't bother ME in the slightest, sorry!
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/24/2009 4:43:50 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:88f136db-71a4-43ac-b6c0-2a4896cb8f51@c36g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> Here's another fact (look it up in the dictionary what that means) for
> you rubber dick:
>
> Italy: Popluation:60,017,677 Tourists per year:43,700,000
> Ireland: Population:4,422,100 Tourists per year:8,000,000
>
> Wow, that's nearly two tourists per person. Why does everybody love us
> so much? It must be our sparkling personalities. We piss all over you
> AGAIN.
See what an UTTER FOOL you are? You totally shoot yourself in your stinking
foot AGAIN! Italy draws 43,700,000 people per year. Mickland a mere
8,000,000 - and I bet those go there because it's damn cheap compared to
other places. Is 8,000,000 > 43,700,000 ? Hmm, it seems you had too much
stout to drink, huh?
But that's not the point. The best part in your autogoal is the fact those
two values ( population and tourists ) are COMPLETELY UNRELATED. Take this
example:
Italy Highest Point: 4,748 m ( Monte Bianco ) - Tourists per year 43,700,000
Ireland Highest Point: 1,041 m ( Carraunthoohil ) - Tourists per
year:8,000,000
"Wow, so probably we get more tourists because we have the highest mountain.
We piss all over you micks!" - that sounds like your typical trainwreck of
thinking, tool, right??? Bwahahahah
I think your ratio between inhabitants and tourists is as significative as a
ratio between dog turds in the streets and clouds in the sky - and
completely useless. It's just another fine example of VERY LOW Irish IQ and
Irish fucked up logic.
Owned once again, TOOL!
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/24/2009 4:58:33 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:e75705a0-2f15-4a50-b389-a12fae693a2e@b9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
On May 24, 5:37 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> yadda yadda Dickrub. Not even an attempt at logic there.
You can't waste logic on a mick with no logic. It's a waste of time and,
besides, I've done that and others have read it. Why repeating myself over
and over again? So that maybe I drop in a typo you can attach your drivel
too? This thread was about the C65. You hijacked it and began to say stupid
shit, like "as clear as the sun" doesn't exist, stout is not beer, our
priests are not child abusers, Ireland is better than Italy at saving
babies... I mean, who the fuck cares? Not only you've been disrespectful to
the whole audience but you also put yourself in a situation where you just
made a complete and utter fool out of yourself.
>You know the insult stuff only really works then there's some new ass
>tearing happening on the argument side, like I'm doing to you constantly?
>The other stuff doesn't bother ME in the slightest, sorry!
Sure, mick, sure, here is another wonderful example of low Irish IQ. The
insult stuff works when somebody gives a shit.That's the golden rule. And
the way you are adamantly replying to each and every one of my "insulting"
posts to you, means you CARE and are bothered A LOT.
Keep up, loser, keep up! The more you write, the more you embarass yourself
in front of everyone!!! AHAHAHAHAHAH
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/24/2009 5:04:37 PM
|
|
On May 24, 5:58 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> See what an UTTER FOOL you are? You totally shoot yourself in your stinking
> foot AGAIN! Italy draws 43,700,000 people per year. Mickland a mere
> 8,000,000 - and I bet those go there because it's damn cheap compared to
> other places. Is 8,000,000 > 43,700,000 ? Hmm, it seems you had too much
> stout to drink, huh?
Pretty fuckin simple to those with adult human comprehension skills:
we're a small country so PER CAPITA is the only fair way to do the
sums. PER CAPITA we piss on you. If you want to put it another way, we
get twice as much money per person from tourists (actually your dump
is so poverty stricken and cheap ass it's probably 10 times) as you
do.
Great isn't it? Maybe that's where all our extar income comes from
while you guys sell off your children to buy pasta or something. Do
UNICEF have any data on your poor ass country? Need a food drop or
anything?
> But that's not the point. The best part in your autogoal is the fact those
> two values ( population and tourists ) are COMPLETELY UNRELATED. Take this
> example:
Let me guess, your theory is now that there is no way to calculate
which country is a better tourist destination? How convenient after
you've just been ROYALLY FUCKED.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/24/2009 5:07:15 PM
|
|
"lyricalnanoha" <lyricalnanoha@usotsuki.hoshinet.org> wrote in message
news:alpine.DEB.0.99.0905241221300.4518@andisteele.dosius.ath.cx...
> ANYWHO!!!!!
>
> *runs*
>
> I wonder how hard it would be to throw together a simple C65 emu in SDL?
> Maybe getting away from the baroqueness of MESS would make it easier to
> get a C65 emu that is a little more useful, not that the C65 was of very
> much use without software...
Probably the fact there is no decent C65 emulator didn't help much with the
lack of software. Throwing together a C65 is difficult for many reasons:
there are many different revisions of the motherboard, there are different
revisions of the chips, in particular, the VIC-III ( 4567 ) after a certain
revision ( R7, IIRC ) behaves differently than the earlier ones. Also, many
of the gifted programmers out there don't own one, so it's certainly harder
of a feat, to recreate a computer just on the specs, without having the real
deal handy.
I think the MESS version runs on top of some framework, which made the
writing of the emulator easier. You could also recompile MESS cutting out
all the unnecessary hardware emulation to have your C65 emulator only. But
still the MESS C65 emulator itself is far from perfect, to do any serious
programming work with.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/24/2009 5:14:04 PM
|
|
On May 24, 6:04=A0pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> And
> the way you are adamantly replying to each and every one of my "insulting=
"
> posts to you, means you CARE and are bothered A LOT.
So whenever somebody repeatedly replies to posts they "CARE and are
bothered A LOT"? That's exactly the fuck what you're doing sunshine.
Here's where you say it doesn't count for you even though you've just
made an utter cockface of yourself for the 1000th time.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/24/2009 5:17:41 PM
|
|
On May 24, 6:04=A0pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> <daniel.oto...@ucd.ie> wrote in message
>
> news:e75705a0-2f15-4a50-b389-a12fae693a2e@b9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> On May 24, 5:37 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>
> > yadda yadda Dickrub. Not even an attempt at logic there.
>
> You can't waste logic on a mick with no logic. It's a waste of time and,
> besides, I've done that and others have read it. Why repeating myself ove=
r
> and over again? So that maybe I drop in a typo you can attach your drivel
> too? This thread was about the C65. You hijacked
Boo hoo, somebody's losing it. And losing.
I hijacked it? I gave my opinion on the C65 assface. It was you that
came out with the "laughable opinion" and "sour grapes" bullshit.
Don't come crying to me now you've had several new anuses installed.
That's 100% proven and anybody can prove it in a second by scrolling
up.
You're delusional DickRub.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/24/2009 5:21:26 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:4c113586-5334-476d-87f8-5cbb51ff4b60@g37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> On May 24, 5:58 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> See what an UTTER FOOL you are? You totally shoot yourself in your
>> stinking
>> foot AGAIN! Italy draws 43,700,000 people per year. Mickland a mere
>> 8,000,000 - and I bet those go there because it's damn cheap compared to
>> other places. Is 8,000,000 > 43,700,000 ? Hmm, it seems you had too much
>> stout to drink, huh?
>
> Pretty fuckin simple to those with adult human comprehension skills:
> we're a small country so PER CAPITA is the only fair way to do the
> sums.
Please, shut the fuck up, TOOL. This theory is utterly ridicoulous and, if
you really want to shove it up our throats, bring some book on economy that
clearly states "the only fair way to do the sums is per capita when dealing
with small countries". Guess what? You can't. So bring some evidence backing
up this theory out of some respected economy book or either SHUT THE FUCK UP
with more useless bullshit!!!
> PER CAPITA we piss on you. If you want to put it another way, we
> get twice as much money per person from tourists (actually your dump
> is so poverty stricken and cheap ass it's probably 10 times) as you
> do.
AHAHAHAHAH!!! You are ridicoulous. Really! This is the most ridicoulous
thing, because obviously the money tourists bring in the picture is NOT
equally distributed among all inhabitants. Does every mick in Ireland run a
fucking bed and breakfast there?
And, wait, do you have the exact figures of how much money those 8 million
tourists coming to Ireland brought? Since Ireland is notoriously a cheap
country to visit, let's assume those brought 1 euro per capita. Now, prices
in Italy are known to be much, much higher than those in mickland. So, let's
assume those 43,700,000 tourists brought 1,90 euro per capita, because
there's also a lot of luxury and expensive stuff to buy here, for example
fashion goods and stuff, not just some fucking St. Patrick hat. Who pisses
on who?
In all intellectual honesty, something you are completely incapable of,
unless you bring the exact figures of how much money those 8 million people
brought to mickland, and how much money the 43,700,000 tourists brought to
Italy, you can't say who pisses on who and your theory of micks pissing on
Italians is just bollocks. Get it mick?
So work on it, fool. It's not like you have a job or anything better to do.
> Great isn't it? Maybe that's where all our extar income comes from
> while you guys sell off your children to buy pasta or something. Do
> UNICEF have any data on your poor ass country? Need a food drop or
> anything?
Tell me something... Why is that Ireland is not even part of the G8? Is that
because, as a country, is as irrelevant as Madagascar? Next time something
that will affect the whole world is decided, Ireland won't even be there. So
you can laugh as much as you want at your "food drop" bullshit, and I wonder
what you mick could drop here anyway...Potatoes and guinness dark piss? LOL
>> But that's not the point. The best part in your autogoal is the fact
>> those
>> two values ( population and tourists ) are COMPLETELY UNRELATED. Take
>> this
>> example:
>
> Let me guess, your theory is now that there is no way to calculate
> which country is a better tourist destination? How convenient after
> you've just been ROYALLY FUCKED.
There is only one fool is always royally fucked, and that is you, Danny boy
Tool. I told you, you are my little bitch - LOL
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/24/2009 5:29:59 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:42d9074c-3dae-4db1-88b3-e91d88344d8c@g1g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On May 24, 6:04 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> And
> the way you are adamantly replying to each and every one of my "insulting"
> posts to you, means you CARE and are bothered A LOT.
>
>>So whenever somebody repeatedly replies to posts they "CARE and are
>>bothered A LOT"?
No, that's what you do!
> That's exactly the fuck what you're doing sunshine.
Yes it is, but I do it for different reasons: because I enjoy humiliating
you over and over again. You are doing it because you're trying desperately
to save your face and tainted reputation, that's why you keep repeating and
repeating the same arguments you've lost over and over and over again, as
anyone can see and as everybody has already noticed.
Let me tell you something, "sunshine" - should we expect more gay bar slang,
Danny boy? :-) - you hit the sewer already, since I flushed you days ago.
There's no return. No matter how hard you try.
> Here's where you say it doesn't count for you even though you've just made
> an utter cockface of yourself for the 1000th time.
All this swearing doesn't make you look strong, mick! That might work at the
pub, between a burp and a fart, but here you just look like a spoiled child
cussing and crying for attention! And losing it... Bwahahahah
Go on, please! Every post you digging your grave further and further!!! It's
so easy sometimes I don't even believe you fall for every bait I throw at
you!!! ahahahaha
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/24/2009 5:35:29 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:15b91f47-ed8b-4d1e-947a-f6b8ff12b63d@c36g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
On May 24, 6:04 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> You can't waste logic on a mick with no logic. It's a waste of time and,
>> besides, I've done that and others have read it. Why repeating myself
>> over
>> and over again? So that maybe I drop in a typo you can attach your drivel
>> too? This thread was about the C65. You hijacked
>
>Boo hoo, somebody's losing it. And losing.
Yeah, Danny boy Tool is!
> I hijacked it? I gave my opinion on the C65 assface.
You said it's useless because it has no software. And I told you, the
difference engine is useless too maybe, because it has no software. And I
dared to tell you it's all sour grapes. Since truth hurts, that's where you
majorly lost it and begun to bring stupid shit, like stout not being beer,
infant mortality rate in Italy and stupid shit like that, just to hijack
the thread even more to save your stupid monkey ass from royal and public
owning. let me tell you something, "sunshine": you didn't succeed, you
actually made it all worse for your reputation, because you clearly hijacked
this thread to run your personal crusuade against me, and you won no
sympathy in this newsgroup, which clearly was your aim when running a
personal crusuade against me. You made no friends here, nobody sided with
you throughout a flame lasting 3 days, you got all your arguments
dismantled, laughed at and thrown in the pit latrine - we can all say this
war campaign you ran at the expenses of a whole usenet group has been a
failure.
> It was you that came out with the "laughable opinion" and "sour grapes"
> bullshit.
See, you're still made at me showing what your real problem is. You can't
stand the fact people laugh at your illogical nonsense, and you can't stand
the fact people actually realize immediately you're one jealous fuck who is
full of venom and shit.
> Don't come crying to me now you've had several new anuses installed.
Please someone make a burp of approvance, so that this mick can finally feel
accepted in this newsgroup.
> That's 100% proven and anybody can prove it in a second by scrolling
> up.You're delusional DickRub.
The only thing that is 100% proven is that you're full of shit, Danny.
Go on!
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/24/2009 5:43:26 PM
|
|
On May 24, 6:29 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> Please, shut the fuck up, TOOL. This theory is utterly ridicoulous and, if
> you really want to shove it up our throats, bring some book on economy that
> clearly states "the only fair way to do the sums is per capita when dealing
> with small countries". Guess what? You can't. So bring some evidence backing
> up this theory out of some respected economy book or either SHUT THE FUCK UP
> with more useless bullshit!!!
Dickrub, per capita, per square mile, per blade of grass, you name it.
You got more of everything in Italy except surviving babies and money.
Oh, and of course tourists. They much prefer visiting us in our small
little low population country.
> AHAHAHAHAH!!! You are ridicoulous. Really! This is the most ridicoulous
> thing, because obviously the money tourists bring in the picture is NOT
> equally distributed among all inhabitants. Does every mick in Ireland run a
> fucking bed and breakfast there?
Based on those phenomenal tourism figures it sure looks like it. If
you had a fucking clue about economics dickrubbin you'd also know that
nearly all money tourists bring into a country stays in the country,
so it benefits everybody there. That's a simple fact. Too simple and
too much of a fact for you probably, loser Dick.
> And, wait, do you have the exact figures of how much money those 8 million
> tourists coming to Ireland brought? Since Ireland is notoriously a cheap
> country to visit
Are you out of your fucking mind? You can write yourself right out of
any discussion on anything with assumptions like that you stupid fuck.
Assume, then look up, then feel a proper dickhead in that order
dickrub.
> So work on it, fool. It's not like you have a job or anything better to do.
Italy: Unemployment rate: 6.8% (2008 est.)
Ireland: Unemployment rate: 6.2% (2008 est.)
Thanks for bringing that up. It's all a CIA conspiracy against the
Italians though, right? HAHAHAHA.
> Tell me something... Why is that Ireland is not even part of the G8? Is that
> because, as a country, is as irrelevant as Madagascar? Next time something
> that will affect the whole world is decided, Ireland won't even be there. So
> you can laugh as much as you want at your "food drop" bullshit, and I wonder
> what you mick could drop here anyway...Potatoes and guinness dark piss? LOL
With your per capita GDP and PPP you'd do well to take anything you
can get and drag it back to your ditch or cave or whatever you hide
under at night. Ireland is a small country, yes. Doesn't stop the
average IRISH PERSON being a million times better off than a begging
useless Italian tramp. Next time a decision is taken at the G8 you'll
do just what you're told as the US's bitch anyway so who give a fuck
about that.
> There is only one fool is always royally fucked, and that is you, Danny boy
> Tool. I told you, you are my little bitch - LOL
"No you are"? WWWWEEEAAAKKK Dickrub WWWWEEEAAAKKK. You should watch
some more children's TV and stock up on material.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/24/2009 5:52:14 PM
|
|
On May 24, 6:43 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> >Boo hoo, somebody's losing it. And losing.
>
> Yeah, Danny boy Tool is!
"No you are!" AGAIN??? FFS can't you write your own stuff? Are you
that fucking braindead?
> > I hijacked it? I gave my opinion on the C65 assface.
>
> You said it's useless because it has no software. And I told you, <snipped fucking lies>
> > It was you that came out with the "laughable opinion" and "sour grapes"
> > bullshit.
>
> See, you're still made at me showing what your real problem is. You can't
> stand the fact people laugh at your illogical nonsense, and you can't stand
> the fact people actually realize immediately you're one jealous fuck who is
> full of venom and shit.
And yet you HAVEN'T ACTUALLY ANSWERED. Who would have fucking guessed
that Rubber Dick? I gave my opinion of the *C65*. You gave your
opinion of *my opinion* i.e. called it "laughable" and said I had
"sour grapes" (still waiting for that evidence to back that up. ah
fuck it I give up). Whatever happened after that you are a 100% lying
scumbag Italian cheating creep if you think you can just lie like that
about posts that EVERYBODY CAN SEE that show I gave an opinion and you
jumped on me.
Now boo hoo you're trying to pretend that didn't happen or make out
whatever fucked up opinion you have of the posts since make any
difference to that how YOU started your own self ass-raping.
> Please someone make a burp of approvance, so that this mick can finally feel
> accepted in this newsgroup.
What? Translation anybody? We know they have pretty low literacy
levels where Dickrub is from. When did you get to decide who is and
isn't accepted here, or is that just the fascist in you talking, Il
Dicke?
> > That's 100% proven and anybody can prove it in a second by scrolling
> > up.You're delusional DickRub.
>
> The only thing that is 100% proven is that you're full of shit, Danny.
Don't we get the full "insult paragraph" this time, you know, where
you make a string of insults to try to compensate for the complete
lack of useful discourse that you've shat out for the rest of your
post?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/24/2009 6:03:42 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:63512056-2894-4e0d-a74e-6eab8d4a8d09@o18g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
> On May 24, 6:43 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> >Boo hoo, somebody's losing it. And losing.
>>
>> Yeah, Danny boy Tool is!
>
> "No you are!" AGAIN??? FFS can't you write your own stuff? Are you
> that fucking braindead?
Don't get that irritated you're losing it, Danny. It's all your fault, not
mine. It's you the braindead here, the Irish with a low IQ, don't forget
that :-))
>> > I hijacked it? I gave my opinion on the C65 assface.
>>
>> You said it's useless because it has no software. And I told you,
>> <snipped fucking lies>
AHAHAH... Removing how I owned your ass to save your face. Let me copy and
paste it once again for EVERYONE to read how stupid you are:
You said it's useless because it has no software. And I told you, the
difference engine is useless too maybe, because it has no software
AHAHAHAH... Danny, should we also scratch Babbage's name off of computing
history books?
>> > It was you that came out with the "laughable opinion" and "sour grapes"
>> > bullshit.
>>
>> See, you're still made at me showing what your real problem is. You can't
>> stand the fact people laugh at your illogical nonsense, and you can't
>> stand
>> the fact people actually realize immediately you're one jealous fuck who
>> is
>> full of venom and shit.
>
> And yet you HAVEN'T ACTUALLY ANSWERED.
Oh, I DID! People can scroll back and see I did answer a ZILLION times.
[snipped irrelevant venom and insults from the low IQ gifted irishman
loser ]
>> Please someone make a burp of approvance, so that this mick can finally
>> feel
>> accepted in this newsgroup.
>
> What? Translation anybody? We know they have pretty low literacy
> levels where Dickrub is from. When did you get to decide who is and
> isn't accepted here, or is that just the fascist in you talking, Il
> Dicke?
AHAHAH, you know you are not accepted and nobody gives a fuck about you, and
your best shot at people's approval here was winning this war of words with
me. Well, I have news for you, mick. You failed. You have lost this war of
words long ago and won no approval, you just won people's despise and
laughter at your back. You can't pretend it's not happening, but deep inside
you know it's true: you made an utter clown out of yourself and just look to
others as being my bitch.
>> > That's 100% proven and anybody can prove it in a second by scrolling
>> > up.You're delusional DickRub.
>>
>> The only thing that is 100% proven is that you're full of shit, Danny.
>
> Don't we get the full "insult paragraph" this time, you know, where
> you make a string of insults to try to compensate for the complete
> lack of useful discourse that you've shat out for the rest of your
> post?
No, that's not my style. That's yours, Danny. I suggest anybody to read back
and see how, at this point of the war you miserably lost, you just resort to
plain insults and miserable personal attacks, like a fucking utter loser all
out of any relevant ammo. You don't even try it anymore, huh, tool?. You are
as cooked as a turkey on thanksgiving day :-)))
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/24/2009 6:30:41 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:a31546e3-f0d0-424d-b366-dd2ad2861b54@r33g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> On May 24, 6:29 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> Please, shut the fuck up, TOOL. This theory is utterly ridicoulous and,
>> if
>> you really want to shove it up our throats, bring some book on economy
>> that
>> clearly states "the only fair way to do the sums is per capita when
>> dealing
>> with small countries". Guess what? You can't. So bring some evidence
>> backing
>> up this theory out of some respected economy book or either SHUT THE FUCK
>> UP
>> with more useless bullshit!!!
>
> Dickrub, per capita, per square mile, per blade of grass, you name it.
> You got more of everything in Italy except surviving babies and money.
> Oh, and of course tourists. They much prefer visiting us in our small
> little low population country.
Yes, 44 million of tourists visiting Italy is less than 8 million tourists
visiting mickland. That, according to Irish math, the same Irish math that
won you the dumbest nation award in rich europe, with an IQ of, what, 92?
Same as some African country with 1/50 of your per capita money and
resources. No matter how much money you throw at a mick, it will stay a
fool.
But, anyway, we have less money per capita because we are 60 millions, while
you micks are, thank God, just 4 millions. The big fallacy in your low iq
thinking, typical of micks, is in willingly ignoring the fact 60 million
people are more than 4 million people so you can't compare these statistics.
You could compare the if both Italy and Ireland had 4 million of
inhabitants, and our figures were lesser than yours. If you have a cake and
you have to split it in sixty million pieces, will be the slice bigger than
if you sliced it in 4 million pieces? Of course not.
Italy per capita GDP Total is 1,814 trillion ( 2008 estimate ). Mickland's
is $191.9 billion ( 2008 estimate ). Italy moves way more money than
Ireland, on the international level is way more relevant than Ireland - and
has always been - but since you micks are less, each mick gets a bigger
piece of the cake. The only reason your country is higher in the statistics
is because, thank God, you micks are few compared to Italians and
inhabitants of other countries, that is, Germany for example. But the truth
is, all your good statistics, were you even just 2,000,000 inhabitants more,
would miserably collapse.That is a mathematical fact.
>> AHAHAHAHAH!!! You are ridicoulous. Really! This is the most ridicoulous
>> thing, because obviously the money tourists bring in the picture is NOT
>> equally distributed among all inhabitants. Does every mick in Ireland run
>> a
>> fucking bed and breakfast there?
>
> Based on those phenomenal tourism figures it sure looks like it. If
> you had a fucking clue about economics dickrubbin you'd also know that
> nearly all money tourists bring into a country stays in the country,
> so it benefits everybody there.
That works only in a fantasy world. The reality is big companies benefit
more than smaller ones. There is no equal distribution, unless you live in
some fucking communist country, you stupid TOOL. Is Ireland a communist
country were everyone earns the SAME EXACT wage? No. Your reasoning makes no
sense at all.
> That's a simple fact. Too simple and
> too much of a fact for you probably, loser Dick.
The world works in no simple way, mick. You'd wish things were simple, so
you could grasp them, but economy and statistics are difficult things to
understand, expecially with a very low Irish IQ.
>> And, wait, do you have the exact figures of how much money those 8
>> million
>> tourists coming to Ireland brought? Since Ireland is notoriously a cheap
>> country to visit
>
> Are you out of your fucking mind? You can write yourself right out of
> any discussion on anything with assumptions like that you stupid fuck.
> Assume, then look up, then feel a proper dickhead in that order
> dickrub.
I will give you a simple proof, loser:
5 star hotel in Dublin, 189 EUR per night, single room.
5 star hotel in Rome: 349 EUR per night, single room.
Again, I will post this again so that maybe you get it:
---
unless you bring the exact figures of how much money those 8 million people
brought to mickland, and how much money the 43,700,000 tourists brought to
Italy, you can't say who pisses on who and your theory of micks pissing on
Italians is just bollocks. Get it mick?
----
>> So work on it, fool. It's not like you have a job or anything better to
>> do.
>
> Italy: Unemployment rate: 6.8% (2008 est.)
> Ireland: Unemployment rate: 6.2% (2008 est.)
> Thanks for bringing that up. It's all a CIA conspiracy against the
> Italians though, right? HAHAHAHA.
Wow, you are better. NOT. We are 60 million and have a 6.8% rate. You micks
are 4 millions and have a 6,2% rate. Simple maths says that, if we were 4
million, our unemployment rate would be 4,53%. If you micks were 60
millions, your unemployment rate would be 9,3% !!! That is, 10 micks out of
100 would be at the bar getting smashed.
HAHAHAHAHA, learn maths Irish Tool!!! Lowest IQ in rich Europe -> Ireland.
No shit! Never forget that, MICK!
>> Tell me something... Why is that Ireland is not even part of the G8? Is
>> that
>> because, as a country, is as irrelevant as Madagascar? Next time
>> something
>> that will affect the whole world is decided, Ireland won't even be there.
>> So
>> you can laugh as much as you want at your "food drop" bullshit, and I
>> wonder
>> what you mick could drop here anyway...Potatoes and guinness dark piss?
>> LOL
>
> With your per capita GDP and PPP you'd do well to take anything you
> can get and drag it back to your ditch or cave or whatever you hide
> under at night. Ireland is a small country, yes. Doesn't stop the
> average IRISH PERSON being a million times better off than a begging
> useless Italian tramp.
Evidence? This is just assumptions based on what? On the per capita intake
of Guinness piss ?
> Next time a decision is taken at the G8 you'll
> do just what you're told as the US's bitch anyway so who give a fuck
> about that.
And while we will be the US's bitch, you won't even qualify as US's
shit.Decisions will be taken that will affect the micks too, but nobody will
give a shit about asking the micks about. This is how relevant micks are,
LOL.
>> There is only one fool is always royally fucked, and that is you, Danny
>> boy
>> Tool. I told you, you are my little bitch - LOL
>
> "No you are"? WWWWEEEAAAKKK Dickrub WWWWEEEAAAKKK. You should watch
> some more children's TV and stock up on material.
You've been OWNED once again mick. No matter how you try, you will always
loose with me. I said it once and I said again: You are
as cooked as a turkey on thanksgiving day :-)))
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/24/2009 6:42:32 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:a0f43a66-e31d-4eb4-bda4-df7ec459d6d2@m19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
On May 24, 5:22 pm, lyricalnanoha
<lyricalnan...@usotsuki.hoshinet.org> wrote:
> ANYWHO!!!!!
>
> *runs*
>
> I wonder how hard it would be to throw together a simple C65 emu in SDL?
> Maybe getting away from the baroqueness of MESS would make it easier to
> get a C65 emu that is a little more useful, not that the C65 was of very
> much use without software...
>
> -uso.
> I'm sorry Rubini fucked this up for you. I made an objective comment
that being "the C65 is useless because a computer with no software is
useless", without even thinking that, God willing, a person with time and
will might write his own software for the C65, like the archive on Funet
shows...
> and he wanted to kick off with his "laughable opinions"
because it is, if all computers without software were useless, we could
throw Babbage's difference engine out of the museum...
>and "sour grapes" BS. And yes, I should know better too.
But you had high hopes you would have won people's sympathy fighting the
champion of all flames. You should have know better it was a battle lost
from the start.
> Start another thread and I'll keep out, promise.
Why don't you just keep out of comp.sys.cbm ? You never had anything useful
or interesting to say, ever, anyway :-)
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/24/2009 7:17:03 PM
|
|
On May 24, 7:30 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> > "No you are!" AGAIN??? FFS can't you write your own stuff? Are you
> > that fucking braindead?
>
> Don't get that irritated you're losing it, Danny. It's all your fault, not
> mine. It's you the braindead here, the Irish with a low IQ, don't forget
> that :-))
"It's you the braindead here"? What stunning originality. I'm waiting
for your next scintillatin joke "no, you are times ten".
> >> You said it's useless because it has no software. And I told you,
> >> <snipped fucking lies>
>
> AHAHAH... Removing how I owned your ass to save your face. Let me copy and
> paste it once again for EVERYONE to read how stupid you are:
They were lies. For want of a better phrase, you started it. I gave my
opinion ON THE C65. You gave your opinion ON MY OPINIONS and added
SOUR GRAPES. You will get repeatedly buttfucked every single time you
bring that up, so be my guest, it's your ass.
> You said it's useless because it has no software. And I told you, the
> difference engine is useless too maybe, because it has no software
>
> AHAHAHAH... Danny, should we also scratch Babbage's name off of computing
> history books?
Why do you keep imagining that "no software" line saves your ass in
the slightest. The Babbage Engine isn't useless without software. The
C65 pretty much is. You can't and won't find anywhere I've
contradicted that because you are a useless Dick.
> Oh, I DID! People can scroll back and see I did answer a ZILLION times.
>
> [snipped irrelevant venom and insults from the low IQ gifted irishman
> loser ]
Wow, you just did a big hissy fit about that, didn't you?
> AHAHAH, you know you are not accepted and nobody gives a fuck about you,
Except the two guys who posted to support my position. Oh, gosh darn,
haven't I just shat on your theory. So sorry.
> and
> your best shot at people's approval here was winning this war of words with
> me. Well, I have news for you, mick. You failed. You have lost this war of
> words long ago and won no approval, you just won people's despise and
> laughter at your back. You can't pretend it's not happening, but deep inside
> you know it's true: you made an utter clown out of yourself and just look to
> others as being my bitch.
Whereas the only people willing to go on record here about the C65
think YOU'RE wrong.
It's amazing that a guy with so many imaginary friends that whisper
into his ear all the time can't come up with anything more witty than
"no, you are" as an insult.
> No, that's not my style. That's yours, Danny. I suggest anybody to read back
> and see how, at this point of the war you miserably lost
Or they could check the parts where you had to admit you fucked up,
like where Croatia and Greece are, or telling us that Ireland is in
Great Britain. Or that Ireland is more expensive than Italy. Yup, you
won every single one of those self mutilating fuck ups didn't you.
Ask mummy for a new pillowcase when you've finished crying.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/24/2009 7:53:17 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:25fac030-eb85-4753-b5fe-735f98552cca@k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> On May 24, 7:30 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> > "No you are!" AGAIN??? FFS can't you write your own stuff? Are you
>> > that fucking braindead?
>>
>> Don't get that irritated you're losing it, Danny. It's all your fault,
>> not
>> mine. It's you the braindead here, the Irish with a low IQ, don't forget
>> that :-))
>
> "It's you the braindead here"? What stunning originality. I'm waiting
> for your next scintillatin joke "no, you are times ten".
I don't have to be original. I got no medical prescription for that. And I
don't give a fuck about pleasing you being original. You count less than a
dried up dogshit on a sidewalk in Madagascar.
>> >> You said it's useless because it has no software. And I told you,
>> >> <snipped fucking lies>
>>
>> AHAHAH... Removing how I owned your ass to save your face. Let me copy
>> and
>> paste it once again for EVERYONE to read how stupid you are:
>
> They were lies. For want of a better phrase, you started it. I gave my
> opinion ON THE C65. You gave your opinion ON MY OPINIONS and added
> SOUR GRAPES.
Yes, I commented your laughable opinion of computers without software being
useless saying that is laughable. It really is laughable, tool! And also I
added sour grapes, because you're clearly jealous. If that wasn't true, it
would have not itched you so much to turn and hijack a whole thread into a
personal crusuade against Rubini. You did it, because Rubini hit the nail in
the head and make you look like a complete and utter clown. And, worse, you
know he was right, he saw your jealousy through the monitor - how did he
manage to do that??? - This is making your head spin and fume, ROTFL
> You will get repeatedly buttfucked every single time you
> bring that up, so be my guest, it's your ass.
That didn't happen, bro! You're the only one buttfucked here, you came in my
web like a fucking useless fly and I am eating you alive. See how miserably
and pathetically you are trying to please people, in fear others hate your
guts because YOU started all this? "Oh, I swear I'll be out of it, if you
start a new thread". What a fucking bloody loser. You are not winning
anyone's sympathy anymore tool. You just showed people you are an illogical,
useless fool, and, no matter how much ass kissing you do, people will just
shit in your face from now on. Ahahahaha... What a loser.
>> You said it's useless because it has no software. And I told you, the
>> difference engine is useless too maybe, because it has no software
>>
>> AHAHAHAH... Danny, should we also scratch Babbage's name off of computing
>> history books?
>
> Why do you keep imagining that "no software" line saves your ass in
> the slightest. The Babbage Engine isn't useless without software. The
> C65 pretty much is. You can't and won't find anywhere I've
> contradicted that because you are a useless Dick.
Actually there is software for the C65, check the TOSEC collection, check
the Funet archive. You know what Funet is, don't you? LOL
>> Oh, I DID! People can scroll back and see I did answer a ZILLION times.
>>
>> [snipped irrelevant venom and insults from the low IQ gifted irishman
>> loser ]
>
> Wow, you just did a big hissy fit about that, didn't you?
I just laugh. The more venom you spit, the more it shows you've been hurt in
your primitive Irish feelings. And, hence, the more you get angry, the more
pleasure I get. I told you: you're a loser and you are my bitch, ahahaha...
>> AHAHAH, you know you are not accepted and nobody gives a fuck about you,
>
> Except the two guys who posted to support my position. Oh, gosh darn,
> haven't I just shat on your theory. So sorry.
Ah, Dragos, the one who failed to post any evidence he actually owns a C65.
Wow, that is really something, a guy claiming he owns a C65 and then showing
no evidence whatsoever and disappearing when asked. What a supporter. And
Clocky, who didn't quite actually support anything you said, he didn't ever
say the C65 is useless, he said its price is not justified by the
specifications of the machine, which is VERY different than saying the
computer is useless. Clocky can intervene if I didn't quite get what he
said... Wanna bet he won't because that is what he said ?
>> and
>> your best shot at people's approval here was winning this war of words
>> with
>> me. Well, I have news for you, mick. You failed. You have lost this war
>> of
>> words long ago and won no approval, you just won people's despise and
>> laughter at your back. You can't pretend it's not happening, but deep
>> inside
>> you know it's true: you made an utter clown out of yourself and just look
>> to
>> others as being my bitch.
>
> Whereas the only people willing to go on record here about the C65
> think YOU'RE wrong.
Really? I saw Sam Gillett quite amazed at how I made a fool out of your ass,
and I saw others clamping fun at your back for your ridicoulous claims about
having a 40 cm dicks which is, you see, very relevant in the whole thread
about the C65. This is your contribute to comp.sys.cbm: claming that strout
is not beer, claiming that "clear as the sun" makes no sense in English,
claiming that Ireland is better than Italy and other stupid stuff nobody
here really gives a fuck about. You have nothing to give to this newsgroup,
except venom and sour grapes. So you might leave as well as you came some
time ago: nobody would care, 'cause you have zip to say, and you're even a
lamer at flaming, you jumped on one of the biggest dogs around and got
bitten very bad.
> It's amazing that a guy with so many imaginary friends that whisper
> into his ear all the time can't come up with anything more witty than
> "no, you are" as an insult.
I never used that as an insult, so probably I have to assume you're talking
about yourself here.
>
>> No, that's not my style. That's yours, Danny. I suggest anybody to read
>> back
>> and see how, at this point of the war you miserably lost
>
> Or they could check the parts where you had to admit you fucked up,
> like where Croatia and Greece are, or telling us that Ireland is in
> Great Britain. Or that Ireland is more expensive than Italy. Yup, you
> won every single one of those self mutilating fuck ups didn't you.
> Ask mummy for a new pillowcase when you've finished crying.
Ireland is cheaper than Italy, this is what I said. You just need to
scroll - does your sperm encrusted mouse have a scrolling wheel? - to read I
said the opposite of what you accuse me of. Probably the blood went to your
head since in my last post I completely destroyed your moronic statistic
junk, huh?
Oh, and if we have to list the "self-mutilating fuck ups" you did, Danny
Tool, well, the list would be quite long, Mr. Ireland. Everytime I
dismantled and pissed on your "arguments" you simply fled like a coward, for
fear of being definitely buried six feet under, beneath the pile of crap,
nonsense and inane idiocy your trainwreck of thoughts brought in this group.
Let's just not forget the only contribution of yours on the C65 topic is you
said the computer is useless because it has no software. Oh, and then you
said that you quite like it. These are definitely priceless contributions,
as much as you saying that you have a 14 inch penis, in a "4% formaldehyde
in phosphate buffered saline" solution. Tell me something, is it by saying
this shit how you usually hook up faggots in gay bars?
Bring it on, TOOL! The Irish turkey is now all roasted, but if we go on any
longer it will get _burned for good_ ...
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/24/2009 8:29:35 PM
|
|
On May 24, 7:42 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> Yes, 44 million of tourists visiting Italy is less than 8 million tourists
> visiting mickland. That, according to Irish math, the same Irish math that
> won you the dumbest nation award in rich europe, with an IQ of, what, 92?
> Same as some African country with 1/50 of your per capita money and
> resources. No matter how much money you throw at a mick, it will stay a
> fool.
Is 44 million more than 8? Did you work that out all on your own?
Well done, but I never said that. I said per capita, square mile, you
name it, people want to come to us more than they want to go to your
penniless ghetto bullshit "country" where the richest guy just happens
to be in charge and they're one step away from restarting burning
gypsies.
> But, anyway, we have less money per capita because we are 60 millions, while
> you micks are, thank God, just 4 millions. The big fallacy in your low iq
> thinking, typical of micks, is in willingly ignoring the fact 60 million
> people are more than 4 million people so you can't compare these statistics.
How does that affect the average Irishman or Italian? Not a fucking
bit you lunaDick. Next you'll use the same "logic" HAHAHA to tell us
the average Indian or Chinese guy has a better life than the average
Italian because they've got a big country. Your fucking Dickhead logic-
free zone asshole.
> You could compare the if both Italy and Ireland had 4 million of
> inhabitants, and our figures were lesser than yours. If you have a cake and
> you have to split it in sixty million pieces, will be the slice bigger than
> if you sliced it in 4 million pieces? Of course not.
Maths, English, logic, sense, all fucked into a blender and
DickRubbing's bullshit added. Result: meaningless bullshit.
> Italy per capita GDP Total is 1,814 trillion ( 2008 estimate ).
WTF is a "per capita total"? You don't even know what that fucking
means, do you? Dig dig dig Dick Dick Dick.
> Mickland's
> is $191.9 billion ( 2008 estimate ). Italy moves way more money than
> Ireland, on the international level is way more relevant than Ireland - and
> has always been - but since you micks are less, each mick gets a bigger
> piece of the cake. The only reason your country is higher in the statistics
> is because, thank God, you micks are few compared to Italians and
> inhabitants of other countries, that is, Germany for example. But the truth
> is, all your good statistics, were you even just 2,000,000 inhabitants more,
> would miserably collapse.That is a mathematical fact.
Wow, that's great. So now you're story is that every country with a
higher GDP than Italy is better than Italy? How THE FUCK does that
help each guy who lives in that country? You're still individually
poor ass motherfuckers compared to us stupid Micks. HAHAHA, no wonder
you're so fucking poor, you've no idea how ANY of this shit works, do
you?
> That works only in a fantasy world. The reality is big companies benefit
> more than smaller ones. There is no equal distribution, unless you live in
> some fucking communist country, you stupid TOOL. Is Ireland a communist
> country were everyone earns the SAME EXACT wage? No. Your reasoning makes no
> sense at all.
Another great theory from Rubber Dick: when tourists spend money in a
country, the people who receive that money never spend it. They just
keep it in a box forever.
Dickrub, that's great, just great. We love you for such self-mocking
bullshit.
> The world works in no simple way, mick. You'd wish things were simple, so
> you could grasp them, but economy and statistics are difficult things to
> understand, expecially with a very low Irish IQ.
Snore.
> I will give you a simple proof, loser:
>
> 5 star hotel in Dublin, 189 EUR per night, single room.
>
> 5 star hotel in Rome: 349 EUR per night, single room.
>
No number of anecdotes (and you have *one* anecdote) constitute data,
my motherfucking Dickheaded friend.
http://www.citymayors.com/economics/expensive_cities2.html
1 London
2 Oslo
3 Dublin
..
..
..
..
20 Milan
Read 'em and cry, self-buttfucking boy.
Sorry it's not from the CIA. Is that website another conspiracy
against Italy? Please tell us.
> Again, I will post this again so that maybe you get it:
>
> unless you bring the exact figures of how much money those 8 million people
> brought to mickland, and how much money the 43,700,000 tourists brought to
> Italy, you can't say who pisses on who and your theory of micks pissing on
> Italians is just bollocks. Get it mick?
There's more tourists per Irish resident and stuff is more expensive
here. Can you work out the rest Dickrub?
> Wow, you are better. NOT. We are 60 million and have a 6.8% rate. You micks
> are 4 millions and have a 6,2% rate. Simple maths says that, if we were 4
> million, our unemployment rate would be 4,53%. If you micks were 60
> millions, your unemployment rate would be 9,3% !!! That is, 10 micks out of
> 100 would be at the bar getting smashed.
Does that help your average Italian? Not a fucking bit. You're too
stupid to even understand "per capita" aren't you?
> HAHAHAHAHA, learn maths Irish Tool!!! Lowest IQ in rich Europe -> Ireland.
> No shit! Never forget that, MICK!
Are you a real human being or a random word generator hooked up to IE?
You'd rather live in a country with higher unemployment as long as the
population was bigger? Man, you're fucked up, fucking up and a fuck
up.
> And while we will be the US's bitch, you won't even qualify as US's
> shit.Decisions will be taken that will affect the micks too, but nobody will
> give a shit about asking the micks about. This is how relevant micks are,
> LOL.
So we're equally useless at the UN. Why did you bring this up then?
Tell me why dickrub? Were you just typing random shit again? You can
tell me, I won't point, I swear...
> You've been OWNED once again mick. No matter how you try, you will always
> loose with me. I said it once and I said again: You are
> as cooked as a turkey on thanksgiving day :-)))
If I've been 100% owned am I less owned if I'm 5ft 1in than if I'm 6ft
2in Rubber Dick? You're saying there's a difference, right? This I
gotta hear.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/24/2009 8:36:51 PM
|
|
On May 24, 8:17 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> that being "the C65 is useless because a computer with no software is
> useless", without even thinking that, God willing, a person with time and
> will might write his own software for the C65, like the archive on Funet
> shows...
A few disk utils, a border demo and some copies of the manual? What
THE FUCK are you on about Dick? Why would anyone buy a computer just
to run a border demo?
>
> > and he wanted to kick off with his "laughable opinions"
>
> because it is,
Ah, there we go, "you can call things what they are" so that's OK.
Fine then, you're the idiotic bastard son of a backward going third
world shithole.
> if all computers without software were useless, we could
> throw Babbage's difference engine out of the museum...
The Difference Engine isn't a programmable computer Dick. You do know
the difference, right? You told us you were a clever Dick, remember?
> >and "sour grapes" BS. And yes, I should know better too.
>
> But you had high hopes you would have won people's sympathy fighting the
> champion of all flames. You should have know better it was a battle lost
> from the start.
Still didn't answer the sour grapes. I've no apologies for fucking YOU
up, only for having any hand in fucking the THREAD up Dickrubbing.
> Why don't you just keep out of comp.sys.cbm ? You never had anything useful
> or interesting to say, ever, anyway :-)
Says the guy world famous for
1) owning some C65s
2) being a cuntface idiot loser
And not in that order.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/24/2009 8:59:59 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:60deedac-4bce-49da-8703-5956a5c33d7e@h2g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...
> On May 24, 8:17 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> that being "the C65 is useless because a computer with no software is
>> useless", without even thinking that, God willing, a person with time and
>> will might write his own software for the C65, like the archive on Funet
>> shows...
>
> A few disk utils, a border demo and some copies of the manual? What
> THE FUCK are you on about Dick? Why would anyone buy a computer just
> to run a border demo?
Nobody would and indeed, something you don't understand, it seems, nobody
buys a C65 for the software. Probably you haven't noticed, but when you
first said there is no software for the C65, I didn't even bother to mention
the Funet stuff, because I know myself it's too little to be considered; but
it does exist. The software is absolutely irrelevant, because the machine
itself is historically valuable with or without software. This was said in
the beginning, I even had a chat with Clocky about it and we agreed, and
still you didn't get. I am saying it now, you are not going to get it this
time either. Why? Typical Low Irish IQ. AND stubborness. You are too
stubborn to accept the obvious defeat, like the fools in IRA who kill their
mick brothers because they don't accept they choose to be protestants and
not catholics. This is the kind of shit you should expect from the
Irish.You'd rather kill each other or commit suicide rather than accepting
defeat.
>>
>> > and he wanted to kick off with his "laughable opinions"
>>
>> because it is,
>
> Ah, there we go, "you can call things what they are" so that's OK.
> Fine then, you're the idiotic bastard son of a backward going third
> world shithole.
Wow, these profane insults are those that are winning you new friends among
the many Italians here. You are showing your true colours here, TOOL. You
are fucked, you know it and all you got are insults, at me, at Italy. Oh,
and profanity, showing the great Irish heritage, you know, the famous Irish
friendliness you love to blabber about and that tourists love so much. It
must be a blast touring your country on the grounds of this attitude. You
dis yourself and your own country everytime you open that shithole of a
mouth, Danny Tool :-))
>> if all computers without software were useless, we could
>> throw Babbage's difference engine out of the museum...
>
> The Difference Engine isn't a programmable computer Dick. You do know
> the difference, right? You told us you were a clever Dick, remember?
Of course I know, so it doesn't even accept software! Following your
interesting theory, a computer that not only does have no software made for
it, but doesn't even support software, should be even more useless! Let's
say torch it, so the mick will be happy!!! Listen the ENIAC is programmable
but there is no software for it. Is that useless too? Nobody will buy
without software, right? Should be set it on fire, so that you might be
happy? Call a friend from IRA and bomb it, tool.
>> >and "sour grapes" BS. And yes, I should know better too.
>>
>> But you had high hopes you would have won people's sympathy fighting the
>> champion of all flames. You should have know better it was a battle lost
>> from the start.
>
> Still didn't answer the sour grapes. I've no apologies for fucking YOU
> up, only for having any hand in fucking the THREAD up Dickrubbing.
So you're apologising to the group. I told you, TOOL: no matter how much ass
kissing you do, people will shit in your face from now on, because you have
just revealed the world you're here for trolling, and, as a troll, you're a
very smelly one and useless one: profanity, illogical thoughts and plain and
utter bullshit are the ingredients that make up your useless rambling
carcass. Oh, did I forgot selfish? You did fuck up a whole thread just to
try to heal your wounded ego. With your attitude you just enforced in the
mind of people the opinion you're a profane, useless fool with nothing to
contribute to this group, rather than pushing his own personal fights. Now
bow on your knees and do the ass kissing and apologising. ROTFL. Let's see
how much sympathy that wins - I say NONE.
>> Why don't you just keep out of comp.sys.cbm ? You never had anything
>> useful
>> or interesting to say, ever, anyway :-)
>
> Says the guy world famous for
> 1) owning some C65s
> 2) being a cuntface idiot loser
> And not in that order.
The turkey is almost all burned. Why don't you just call it a day? You ain't
gonna win this one, Tool.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/24/2009 9:22:19 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:a9352063-7dbe-4822-93d6-7cbd3570a99b@g37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> On May 24, 7:42 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> Yes, 44 million of tourists visiting Italy is less than 8 million
>> tourists
>> visiting mickland. That, according to Irish math, the same Irish math
>> that
>> won you the dumbest nation award in rich europe, with an IQ of, what, 92?
>> Same as some African country with 1/50 of your per capita money and
>> resources. No matter how much money you throw at a mick, it will stay a
>> fool.
>
> Is 44 million more than 8? Did you work that out all on your own?
> Well done, but I never said that.
So you never said that 44 millions are more than 8. LOL! Exactly what I
said. AHAHAAH... You are going against maths claiming that 8 millions are
more than 44 millions, making an utter fool out of yourself and fucking up
once again. Numbers, are numbers, tool, you can't fuck up with numbers,
people will notice that. No matter how you stress it, no matter per capita,
per dick, square, mile, whatever, 44 millions people choosing Italy are MORE
than 8 million choosing fucking mickland.
And tourist per capita is a concept with NO meaning. 8 million tourists is
still LESS than 44 millions. That means 44 million people perefer to visit
Italy against 8 million tourists who prefer Ireland. The per capita shit
makes NO sense, because tourists do not choose a country against the other
on per capita reasons. If you were 80 millions you would still get 8 million
tourists, it's not like having more inhabitants makes more tourists, you
complete and UTTER FOOL.
And we should also look at the kind of tourism Italy and mickland get each.
If you get 8,000,000 of globetrotters, with no money and paying 30 eur per
night to sleep in some fucking bed and breakfast, well, you might take them
all, while we get all the important Japanese and American business tourists,
who spend thousands buying all those precious, made in Italy goods the whole
world is after. Oh, but you have the guinness, right. The dark piss strout.
That should make you a lot of money that stays in the country, I suppose,
along with the tourist's bottles filled with piss.
>> But, anyway, we have less money per capita because we are 60 millions,
>> while
>> you micks are, thank God, just 4 millions. The big fallacy in your low iq
>> thinking, typical of micks, is in willingly ignoring the fact 60 million
>> people are more than 4 million people so you can't compare these
>> statistics.
>
> How does that affect the average Irishman or Italian? Not a fucking
> bit you lunaDick. Next you'll use the same "logic" HAHAHA to tell us
> the average Indian or Chinese guy has a better life than the average
> Italian because they've got a big country. Your fucking Dickhead logic-
> free zone asshole.
I said the complete OPPOSITE indeed. Foot in mouth again, TOOL ? You are
getting better statistics because mickland is a small country. Keeping your
ratios fixed and raising the number of inhabitants, you would get third
world statistics, as I have shown below. You could be in the African
statistics, with no offense intended to african countries.
>> You could compare the if both Italy and Ireland had 4 million of
>> inhabitants, and our figures were lesser than yours. If you have a cake
>> and
>> you have to split it in sixty million pieces, will be the slice bigger
>> than
>> if you sliced it in 4 million pieces? Of course not.
>
> Maths, English, logic, sense, all fucked into a blender and
> DickRubbing's bullshit added. Result: meaningless bullshit.
This is completely understandable to everyone but yourself. You have to
comment with insults, because you really can't say anything here...
>> Italy per capita GDP Total is 1,814 trillion ( 2008 estimate ).
>
> WTF is a "per capita total"? You don't even know what that fucking
> means, do you? Dig dig dig Dick Dick Dick.
>
>> Mickland's
>> is $191.9 billion ( 2008 estimate ). Italy moves way more money than
>> Ireland, on the international level is way more relevant than Ireland -
>> and
>> has always been - but since you micks are less, each mick gets a bigger
>> piece of the cake. The only reason your country is higher in the
>> statistics
>> is because, thank God, you micks are few compared to Italians and
>> inhabitants of other countries, that is, Germany for example. But the
>> truth
>> is, all your good statistics, were you even just 2,000,000 inhabitants
>> more,
>> would miserably collapse.That is a mathematical fact.
>
> Wow, that's great. So now you're story is that every country with a
> higher GDP than Italy is better than Italy? How THE FUCK does that
> help each guy who lives in that country? You're still individually
> poor ass motherfuckers compared to us stupid Micks. HAHAHA, no wonder
> you're so fucking poor, you've no idea how ANY of this shit works, do
> you?
You just don't understand plain logic, but luckily others do. I will leave
this exactly as it is, so other can read and see you don't understand even
the simplest logic. Ahahaha, incredible...Either you fake not to understand
on purpose or you are even more stupid than I thought.
>
>> That works only in a fantasy world. The reality is big companies benefit
>> more than smaller ones. There is no equal distribution, unless you live
>> in
>> some fucking communist country, you stupid TOOL. Is Ireland a communist
>> country were everyone earns the SAME EXACT wage? No. Your reasoning makes
>> no
>> sense at all.
>
> Another great theory from Rubber Dick: when tourists spend money in a
> country, the people who receive that money never spend it. They just
> keep it in a box forever.
> Dickrub, that's great, just great. We love you for such self-mocking
> bullshit.
Of course the people who are getting the tourist's money are all the same.
You don't have big corporations, big companies, the average Joe. No,
everyone spends his fucking money within Ireland, according to this fucking
TOOL. Listen TOOL what if those happy bed and breakfast owners spend their
money in FIAT stocks. Will the money still stay in Ireland? Will the money
spent at McDonald's stay as a whole in Ireland? You got to be fucking
kidding, FOOL about every pence staying in Ireland. And since you can count
only on 8 million tourists, you're getting definitely LESS money than we are
doing. This is a FACT. If you had the same amount of tourism we have in
Italy, you micks would be millionaires, ideally splitting the cake just in 4
millions.
>> The world works in no simple way, mick. You'd wish things were simple, so
>> you could grasp them, but economy and statistics are difficult things to
>> understand, expecially with a very low Irish IQ.
>
> Snore.
>
>> I will give you a simple proof, loser:
>>
>> 5 star hotel in Dublin, 189 EUR per night, single room.
>>
>> 5 star hotel in Rome: 349 EUR per night, single room.
>>
>
> No number of anecdotes (and you have *one* anecdote) constitute data,
> my motherfucking Dickheaded friend.
> http://www.citymayors.com/economics/expensive_cities2.html
We're not talking about living in some place FOOL, we're talking about
TOURISM - poor little shit! Take for example the traveler's digest, which is
relevant to TOURISM:
http://www.travelersdigest.com/expensive_cities.htm
Dublin isn't even listed in the first fifteen! Of course, there is
Milan...And we didn't mention that tourism in the countryside, places like
Cork, is bloody fucking cheap too compared to tourism say, in Tuscany...
But all of this is irrelevant anyway to the C65 topic so why are we still
discussing? Wait, you just keep on bringing new topics with the hope of
saving your face saying that historical computers with no software are
useless and should be dumped in the trash. Ok.
>> Again, I will post this again so that maybe you get it:
>>
>> unless you bring the exact figures of how much money those 8 million
>> people
>> brought to mickland, and how much money the 43,700,000 tourists brought
>> to
>> Italy, you can't say who pisses on who and your theory of micks pissing
>> on
>> Italians is just bollocks. Get it mick?
>
> There's more tourists per Irish resident and stuff is more expensive
> here. Can you work out the rest Dickrub?
The fact there is more tourists per resident doesn't mean shit. What does it
mean, that micks are friendly? You are the living proof micks have a really
bad attitude and temper. And since when friendliness can be measured
mathematically? See what a stupid shit you are, you always mess up
measurable facts with stupid mick OPINIONS.
>> Wow, you are better. NOT. We are 60 million and have a 6.8% rate. You
>> micks
>> are 4 millions and have a 6,2% rate. Simple maths says that, if we were 4
>> million, our unemployment rate would be 4,53%. If you micks were 60
>> millions, your unemployment rate would be 9,3% !!! That is, 10 micks out
>> of
>> 100 would be at the bar getting smashed.
>
> Does that help your average Italian? Not a fucking bit. You're too
> stupid to even understand "per capita" aren't you?
I understand it perfectly, it you who can't get the fact your unemployment
ratio is worse, but looks better because you micks are less. As I said,
using a simple proportion ( as thought in elementary school, do you micks
have elementary school? ), with the same amount of inhabitants as Italy, but
keeping the same inhabitants/unemployed ratio, the unemployment rate in
Ireland would be 9,3%, which is pretty much shit.
>> HAHAHAHAHA, learn maths Irish Tool!!! Lowest IQ in rich Europe ->
>> Ireland.
>> No shit! Never forget that, MICK!
>
> Are you a real human being or a random word generator hooked up to IE?
> You'd rather live in a country with higher unemployment as long as the
> population was bigger? Man, you're fucked up, fucking up and a fuck
> up.
Learn maths, mick! And yes, I'd rather be unemployed in Italy - which I am
not - than employed in Ireland, among micks and illiterate fucks like you.
>> And while we will be the US's bitch, you won't even qualify as US's
>> shit.Decisions will be taken that will affect the micks too, but nobody
>> will
>> give a shit about asking the micks about. This is how relevant micks are,
>> LOL.
>
> So we're equally useless at the UN. Why did you bring this up then?
Where does the UN fit in this discussion, tool? Do you know what the UN are?
The G8 has nothing to do with the UN. Shooting yourself in the foot again?
Showing what an illiterate fool you are again?
>> You've been OWNED once again mick. No matter how you try, you will always
>> loose with me. I said it once and I said again: You are
>> as cooked as a turkey on thanksgiving day :-)))
>
> If I've been 100% owned am I less owned if I'm 5ft 1in than if I'm 6ft
> 2in Rubber Dick? You're saying there's a difference, right? This I
> gotta hear.
You can't really keep up with maths, huh? But let me answer your question:
no, you're either owned or not, it's not measurable like potatoes or
Guinness piss like you do at the mick market. So you're still a loser and,
of course, you're still my bitch.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/24/2009 9:39:33 PM
|
|
On May 24, 10:22 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> Nobody would and indeed, something you don't understand, it seems, nobody
> buys a C65 for the software. Probably you haven't noticed, but when you
> first said there is no software for the C65, I didn't even bother to mention
> the Funet stuff, because I know myself it's too little to be considered; but
> it does exist.
Great. If I ever need a border demo for the C65 I know where to call.
That's made my fucking day Dick Rubby.
> The software is absolutely irrelevant, because the machine
> itself is historically valuable with or without software. This was said in
> the beginning, I even had a chat with Clocky about it and we agreed, and
> still you didn't get.
Historically and economically valuable. Great. Who didn't agree with
that? Isn't every rare piece of computer stuff the same.
But, sorry Dick, no-one ever contested that did they? Is it much
fucking use to have one sitting in your attic? No. Does it do much
without any software? No.
> I am saying it now, you are not going to get it this
> time either. Why? Typical Low Irish IQ. AND stubborness. You are too
> stubborn to accept the obvious defeat, like the fools in IRA who kill their
> mick brothers because they don't accept they choose to be protestants and
> not catholics. This is the kind of shit you should expect from the
> Irish.You'd rather kill each other or commit suicide rather than accepting
> defeat.
I don't think any Italians, who shipped trainloads of Jews and gypsies
to Auschwitz and managed to massacre a few hundred thousand
defenceless Ethopians for no apparent reason can lecture an Irish guy
on anything, can they DickRubber? Fingerprinted any new ethnic
minorities lately, Il Dicke?
> Wow, these profane insults are those that are winning you new friends among
> the many Italians here. You are showing your true colours here, TOOL. You
> are fucked, you know it and all you got are insults, at me, at Italy.
WTF? You started the "Irish Irish Irish" thing and the "laughable"
thing so don't cry when you get it back up your ass only 10 times
stronger. Remember, whatever fucking shit farts out your mouth, the
only people who bothered their asses to post here about the C65 WERE
ON MY SIDE. DEAL WITH IT. YOU LOST BY VOTE ON THIS FORUM. Oh, wait,
you're a fascist cunt so you don't care about voting, do you?
> Oh,
> and profanity, showing the great Irish heritage, you know, the famous Irish
> friendliness you love to blabber about and that tourists love so much. It
> must be a blast touring your country on the grounds of this attitude. You
> dis yourself and your own country everytime you open that shithole of a
> mouth, Danny Tool :-))
Who gives a fuck what you think. That 8,000,000 in our tiny country
per year certainly don't give a fuck what you think.
> Of course I know, so it doesn't even accept software! Following your
> interesting theory, a computer that not only does have no software made for
> it, but doesn't even support software, should be even more useless! Let's
> say torch it, so the mick will be happy!!! Listen the ENIAC is programmable
> but there is no software for it. Is that useless too? Nobody will buy
> without software, right? Should be set it on fire, so that you might be
> happy? Call a friend from IRA and bomb it, tool.
You want a slight amendment? "A computer that NEEDS software, like the
C65, us pretty useless without software".
You could deliberately pick something that is barely considered a
computer like Babbage's Engine, but that would do fuck all for the
rule which would still fit 99% of programmable computers out there.
Sorry, you can keep doing what you do best. Lose.
> So you're apologising to the group. I told you, TOOL: no matter how much ass
> kissing you do, people will shit in your face from now on, because you have
> just revealed the world you're here for trolling, and, as a troll,
In that case the only difference between the two of us is that you're
a world famous troll dickhead. I must be some sort of apprentice
troll. Believe me, everybody on earth who's been near usenet or a C=
forum knows about the great troll asshole Dick Rubbing.
> you're a
> very smelly one and useless one: profanity, illogical thoughts and plain and
> utter bullshit
You managed to whine like a bitch about profanity and use the word
bullshit in the same sentence. Again Dick, what the fuck are you on if
you think that makes sense?
> are the ingredients that make up your useless rambling
> carcass. Oh, did I forgot selfish? You did fuck up a whole thread just to
> try to heal your wounded ego. With your attitude you just enforced in the
> mind of people the opinion you're a profane, useless fool with nothing to
> contribute to this group, rather than pushing his own personal fights.
Already proven you started the flame with your "laughable opinion" and
"sour grapes". If you can't handle the flames then get the fuck out of
the kitchen baby Dick.
> Now
> bow on your knees and do the ass kissing and apologising. ROTFL. Let's see
> how much sympathy that wins - I say NONE.
I apologised to one guy, not to you dickhead or anybody else. That's
why I quoted HIM in my response. Oh, but you're too much of a dumb
Rubber Dick to understand how that works, you know quoting something
properly like a post or an English phrase.
The world where I've apologised to you is the same imaginary world
where people give a shit about what you think. The one you live in
after you've cried yourself to sleep after getting raped on English,
History, Geography and just about every-fucking-thing else.
> The turkey is almost all burned. Why don't you just call it a day? You ain't
> gonna win this one, Tool.
What's that, the tenth time you've begged me to stop whipping your
butt? Why do you keep asking me to stop buttfucking you Rubber Dick?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/24/2009 10:44:25 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:0c4ed95d-d4d7-4d7c-aecb-aa26607b56c3@z5g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> On May 24, 10:22 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> Nobody would and indeed, something you don't understand, it seems, nobody
>> buys a C65 for the software. Probably you haven't noticed, but when you
>> first said there is no software for the C65, I didn't even bother to
>> mention
>> the Funet stuff, because I know myself it's too little to be considered;
>> but
>> it does exist.
>
> Great. If I ever need a border demo for the C65 I know where to call.
> That's made my fucking day Dick Rubby.
What part didn't you understand of what I wrote above, TOOL ? Looks like
your IQ is even lower than the "great" Irish average :-))
I will quote it again:
>> I didn't even bother to mention
>> the Funet stuff, because I know myself it's too little to be considered
So your point is?
I suspect you're not even able to write a border demo. Please now tell us
how do you change the border on the C64, in Basic and then in Assembly, just
to show us at least some basic knowledge of a Commodore computer, for those
who are wondering what the fuck are you doing in this group.
Write a little BASIC program that does what the C65 demo does, changing the
border in sequence, then do the same in Assembly. It's simple and the
majority of us knows how to do it. This is more relevant to what
comp.sys.cbm was meant for, than chatting about the tourist per capita the
micks get, you know.. If you manage to show us some skills that match what
such a loudmouth smartass is expected to have, it will work better than any
other butt-kissing you've done so far.
Oh, and don't worry. We will get back at your gibberish later. But now show
us you can actually do something with a Commodore computer, other than
saying it's shit and taking a crap on the work of some of the most respected
engineers in the Commodore history.
Go ahead, we are all awaiting to stand in awe at your actual skills.
Riccardo
P.S.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/oct/11/guardianweeklytechnologysection.letters
Daniel (O')Tool(e) trolling on the guardian.co.uk, comparing a Commodore 64
to a Mac, claiming nobody nowadays uses both kinds of computers. Looks like
we really found some new troll to play with. Let's see how does he compare
to the former ones.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/24/2009 11:14:47 PM
|
|
On May 24, 10:39 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> > Is 44 million more than 8? Did you work that out all on your own?
> > Well done, but I never said that.
>
> So you never said that 44 millions are more than 8. LOL!
No I didn't, because the absolute numbers don't matter a fuck to
anybody.
> Exactly what I
> said. AHAHAAH... You are going against maths claiming that 8 millions are
> more than 44 millions,
Didn't. Show me where I did.
> making an utter fool out of yourself and fucking up
> once again. Numbers, are numbers, tool, you can't fuck up with numbers,
> people will notice that.
And if I've said 8m is greater than 44 million somewhere I'm sure
you'll quote it here... of course you won't you lying chickenshit
greasy cunt because you can't.
> No matter how you stress it, no matter per capita,
> per dick, square, mile, whatever, 44 millions people choosing Italy are MORE
> than 8 million choosing fucking mickland.
Nope. Per capita, 44 million tourists visiting Italy is less than 8
million visiting Ireland. That's simple maths.
YOU FUCKED UP YET AGAIN.
> And tourist per capita is a concept with NO meaning. 8 million tourists is
> still LESS than 44 millions. That means 44 million people perefer to visit
> Italy against 8 million tourists who prefer Ireland. The per capita shit
> makes NO sense, because tourists do not choose a country against the other
> on per capita reasons. If you were 80 millions you would still get 8 million
> tourists, it's not like having more inhabitants makes more tourists, you
> complete and UTTER FOOL.
We can't even fucking fit 44 million standing toe to toe on this
island. It'd be physically impossible. Face it fuckwad, for our size,
population, you fucking name it, more people want to come here.
> And we should also look at the kind of tourism Italy and mickland get each.
> If you get 8,000,000 of globetrotters, with no money and paying 30 eur per
> night to sleep in some fucking bed and breakfast, well, you might take them
> all, while we get all the important Japanese and American business tourists,
> who spend thousands buying all those precious, made in Italy goods the whole
> world is after.
Now this is easy. We sell that shit here too. Ya know we import it and
sell it. We buy it too as you fuckers can afford to so somebody has
to.
> I said the complete OPPOSITE indeed. Foot in mouth again, TOOL ? You are
> getting better statistics because mickland is a small country. Keeping your
> ratios fixed and raising the number of inhabitants, you would get third
> world statistics, as I have shown below. You could be in the African
> statistics, with no offense intended to african countries.
OK, you can stop telling everybody you don't know what a fucking
percentage is. What the fuck are you on about changing the number of
inhabitants for? If there were 100 billion people in Ireland it would
sink with the weight. So the fuck what? We have 5 million and that's
it. You can't use some makey uppey Ireland that has 100 million
population for your sums because it doesn't exist.
YOU STILL HAVEN'T FIGURED OUT WHAT PER CAPITA MEANS. LOOK IT UP. THIS
IS PAINFUL, IF HILARIOUS TO WATCH, FOR EVERYBODY ELSE.
> This is completely understandable to everyone but yourself. You have to
> comment with insults, because you really can't say anything here...
Why are you moaning like a sissy girly bitch AGAIN about "insults"?
WTF have you been posting? Love letters? Love of bullshit maybe.
> > Wow, that's great. So now you're story is that every country with a
> > higher GDP than Italy is better than Italy? How THE FUCK does that
> > help each guy who lives in that country? You're still individually
> > poor ass motherfuckers compared to us stupid Micks. HAHAHA, no wonder
> > you're so fucking poor, you've no idea how ANY of this shit works, do
> > you?
>
> You just don't understand plain logic, but luckily others do. I will leave
> this exactly as it is, so other can read and see you don't understand even
> the simplest logic. Ahahaha, incredible...Either you fake not to understand
> on purpose or you are even more stupid than I thought.
Great, I'm glad I gave you a second chance and you managed to fuck
that up too. So you'd rather live in a country with $1 GDP and 100
inhabitants (that's $0.01 each) than a country with $1 GDP and 10
inhabitants (that's $0.10 each)? You'd actually prefer 1c to 10c?
Didn't you tell me you were smart? You just DON'T LIKE MONEY? Ah, that
explains your ditch living rat hunting lifestyle I guess.
> Of course the people who are getting the tourist's money are all the same.
> You don't have big corporations, big companies, the average Joe. No,
> everyone spends his fucking money within Ireland, according to this fucking
> TOOL. Listen TOOL what if those happy bed and breakfast owners spend their
> money in FIAT stocks. Will the money still stay in Ireland? Will the money
> spent at McDonald's stay as a whole in Ireland? You got to be fucking
> kidding, FOOL about every pence staying in Ireland. And since you can count
> only on 8 million tourists, you're getting definitely LESS money than we are
> doing. This is a FACT. If you had the same amount of tourism we have in
> Italy, you micks would be millionaires, ideally splitting the cake just in 4
> millions.
We don't have the same amount per capita. WE HAVE MORE YOU TWAT. I
never said every pence "stays" in Ireland, but even if the same
percentage of it stays here as does in Italy, we still get more each
than you cheap ass fuckers.
> We're not talking about living in some place FOOL, we're talking about
> TOURISM - poor little shit! Take for example the traveler's digest, which is
> relevant to TOURISM:
>
> http://www.travelersdigest.com/expensive_cities.htm
>
> Dublin isn't even listed in the first fifteen! Of course, there is
> Milan...And we didn't mention that tourism in the countryside, places like
> Cork, is bloody fucking cheap too compared to tourism say, in Tuscany...
And I quote from the VERY FUCKING PAGE YOU GAVE
" World's Most Expensive Cities
This is the ranking of the world's most expensive cities IN REGARDS TO
LIVING COSTS."
I thought you said the table was for tourist cost YOU LYING SELF-
FUCKING SACK OF SHIT.
I just gave you a list with Dublin higher than any Italian shithole
AND IT HAS REFERENCES
THE MOST EXPENSIVE CITIES IN THE WORLD
ECA International survey (June 2008): Introduction | Table: World |
Table: Europe | Table: Asia |
UBS survey (March 2008): Most expensive cities (Intro) | World's most
expensive cities (table) | Richest cities by personal earnings (table)
| Richest cities by purchasing power (table |
Mercer survey (July 2008): Most expensive cities
EIU survey (2007): Most expensive cities
Where are the references for your article again? Oh, IT DOESN'T
FUCKING HAVE ANY YOU LOSER DICK.
> The fact there is more tourists per resident doesn't mean shit. What does it
> mean, that micks are friendly? You are the living proof micks have a really
> bad attitude and temper. And since when friendliness can be measured
> mathematically? See what a stupid shit you are, you always mess up
> measurable facts with stupid mick OPINIONS.
Who needs to measure it mathematically. They come here and spend more
money for each of us nice Micks. Thanks everybody!
> I understand it perfectly, it you who can't get the fact your unemployment
> ratio is worse, but looks better because you micks are less. As I said,
> using a simple proportion ( as thought in elementary school, do you micks
> have elementary school? ), with the same amount of inhabitants as Italy, but
> keeping the same inhabitants/unemployed ratio, the unemployment rate in
> Ireland would be 9,3%, which is pretty much shit.
This is bullshit. If I lived in Italy I would have a higher chance of
being unemployed because your country is shit. And it's no wonder if
you think those sums of yours make any sense. Who cares what the total
number is, that's dependent on the total population which doesn't
really matter a crap when you're looking for a job and your country is
shit and has a higher percentage unemployed.
> Learn maths, mick! And yes, I'd rather be unemployed in Italy - which I am
> not - than employed in Ireland, among micks and illiterate fucks like you.
With sums like that you'd make a great... nothing actually. You'd be a
great pigfucker, but that's only a guess 'cos we don't have them here.
> Where does the UN fit in this discussion, tool? Do you know what the UN are?
> The G8 has nothing to do with the UN. Shooting yourself in the foot again?
> Showing what an illiterate fool you are again?
G8, UN, who gives a fuck. You don't call the shots on shit anymore.
You're nobody except someone else's bitch.
> You can't really keep up with maths, huh? But let me answer your question:
> no, you're either owned or not, it's not measurable like potatoes or
> Guinness piss like you do at the mick market. So you're still a loser and,
> of course, you're still my bitch.
Hey, what happened to "Italy per capita GDP Total is 1,814 trillion
( 2008 estimate )"
You never explained what "per capita GDP Total" is, did you? Did that
just fucking disappear from history like all Italy's Jews, Rubber Il
Dicke?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/24/2009 11:26:40 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:9b89198d-5ff8-437e-ba83-6d7020e735f3@q16g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...
> On May 24, 10:39 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> > Is 44 million more than 8? Did you work that out all on your own?
>> > Well done, but I never said that.
>>
>> So you never said that 44 millions are more than 8. LOL!
>
> No I didn't, because the absolute numbers don't matter a fuck to
> anybody.
Really, but yet you refuse to relate those numbers the right way, making
useless relations, like the useless "per capita tourist" invention, that
means absolutely nothing, expecially when you claim that a country with more
inhabitants draws more tourists and some other utter bullshit. What a
fucking TOOL! Where is the relation?
>> Exactly what I
>> said. AHAHAAH... You are going against maths claiming that 8 millions are
>> more than 44 millions,
>
> Didn't. Show me where I did.
You claim everywhere that 8 million tourists in mickland are more than 44
millions in Italy. Just read the previous gibberish you posted !!!
>> making an utter fool out of yourself and fucking up
>> once again. Numbers, are numbers, tool, you can't fuck up with numbers,
>> people will notice that.
>
> And if I've said 8m is greater than 44 million somewhere I'm sure
> you'll quote it here... of course you won't you lying chickenshit
> greasy cunt because you can't.
Of course I can, you dimwit !!!
>You got more of everything in Italy except surviving babies and money.
>Oh, and of course tourists. They much prefer visiting us in our small
>little low population country.
We have 44 millions tourists and mickland got only 8 millions. Yet you claim
we got more of everything EXCEPT surviving babies, money AND of course
tourists. That means you have MORE tourists.
Another sence that shows how fucking clueless you are, even trying to twist
maths to further your ego. Unfortunately, loosing once again like a TOOL.
Wait, you will bring the per capita thing now, right tool? You have more
tourist per capita. What a nice way to hide the fact 8 millions is still WAY
LESS than 44 Millions. What a nice way to hide the fact 8 millions or 43
millions are completely unrelated to how many inhabitants live in a country,
but just related to its tourist attractions...And Italy definitely got more
tourist becuase it got MORE tourist attractions, TOOL
>> No matter how you stress it, no matter per capita,
>> per dick, square, mile, whatever, 44 millions people choosing Italy are
>> MORE
>> than 8 million choosing fucking mickland.
>
> Nope. Per capita, 44 million tourists visiting Italy is less than 8
> million visiting Ireland. That's simple maths.
> YOU FUCKED UP YET AGAIN.
>
>> And tourist per capita is a concept with NO meaning. 8 million tourists
>> is
>> still LESS than 44 millions. That means 44 million people perefer to
>> visit
>> Italy against 8 million tourists who prefer Ireland. The per capita shit
>> makes NO sense, because tourists do not choose a country against the
>> other
>> on per capita reasons. If you were 80 millions you would still get 8
>> million
>> tourists, it's not like having more inhabitants makes more tourists, you
>> complete and UTTER FOOL.
>
> We can't even fucking fit 44 million standing toe to toe on this
> island.
Yes, because OF COURSE, 8 million of tourists, or 44 million tourists come
to a country AT THE SAME TIME, altogether!!!
WHAT A FUCKING TOOL!!!
> It'd be physically impossible. Face it fuckwad, for our size
LOL, what a TOOL
> population, you fucking name it, more people want to come here.
More people than where, who, when, what? You don't want me to really make
some territory/extension, tourist per mile comparions that will rule out
once again your mediocre and moronic allegations - don't you have had enough
embarassment, FOOL?
>> And we should also look at the kind of tourism Italy and mickland get
>> each.
>> If you get 8,000,000 of globetrotters, with no money and paying 30 eur
>> per
>> night to sleep in some fucking bed and breakfast, well, you might take
>> them
>> all, while we get all the important Japanese and American business
>> tourists,
>> who spend thousands buying all those precious, made in Italy goods the
>> whole
>> world is after.
>
> Now this is easy. We sell that shit here too. Ya know we import it and
> sell it. We buy it too as you fuckers can afford to so somebody has
> to.
You buy Italian goods in mickland and you pretend that importing those goods
doesn't affect the final sale price? We don't import shit from Ireland,
apart from the Guinness piss. And the fact you sell Italian goods to
tourists in Ireland means you don't really have shit to sell from your
fucking country, apart from the odd St. Patrick hat with a shit stain one.
What an embarassing picture you make out of your country everytime, keeping
your stupid tongue on the loose, you fucking twat!!!
>> I said the complete OPPOSITE indeed. Foot in mouth again, TOOL ? You are
>> getting better statistics because mickland is a small country. Keeping
>> your
>> ratios fixed and raising the number of inhabitants, you would get third
>> world statistics, as I have shown below. You could be in the African
>> statistics, with no offense intended to african countries.
>
> OK, you can stop telling everybody you don't know what a fucking
> percentage is. What the fuck are you on about changing the number of
> inhabitants for? If there were 100 billion people in Ireland it would
> sink with the weight.
It's sadly obvious you don't even understand proportions and the most
elementary maths.
> So the fuck what? We have 5 million and that's
> it. You can't use some makey uppey Ireland that has 100 million
> population for your sums because it doesn't exist.
It's useless trying to explain you, your IQ is too low. It's like trying to
explain nuclear fusion to a chimp. Would the chimp get it? No. It would just
ook and ook like you do, and begin throwing feces. Wait, it's exactly what
you've been doing since a few days! Ooking and throwing feces!
> YOU STILL HAVEN'T FIGURED OUT WHAT PER CAPITA MEANS.
I studied latin when you were still wanking at the picture of father
O'Grady, TOOL. It means per person and the way you are using it, inventing
this new figure of the "tourist per person", which is more valuable
depending where the fuck steps his/her foot on, makes no fucking sense to
anyone. It's not the number of inhabitants that draws tourists, TOOL. It's
the tourist attractions in a country that do. Get it, TOOL ?
> LOOK IT UP. THIS
> IS PAINFUL, IF HILARIOUS TO WATCH, FOR EVERYBODY ELSE.
Oh, it sure is, TOOL. You're hopeless in this war, and, worse, you are all
alone.
>> This is completely understandable to everyone but yourself. You have to
>> comment with insults, because you really can't say anything here...
>
> Why are you moaning like a sissy girly bitch AGAIN about "insults"?
> WTF have you been posting? Love letters? Love of bullshit maybe.
The love of bullshit department is all yours. You have hijacked this thread
to tourism just to hide how clueless you are about computing. Why don't you
get back at the Commodore topics? Maybe because you can't without making an
utter fool out of yourself everytime you open up your mouth, cuntface? Oh,
and just to remember who is the sissy here, you were the first one who cried
like a fruit, feeling insulted for me calling him out on "sour grapes".
Bwahahahaha, do you want a Kleenex, Danny boy? What an hypocritical
dickhead....
>> > Wow, that's great. So now you're story is that every country with a
>> > higher GDP than Italy is better than Italy? How THE FUCK does that
>> > help each guy who lives in that country? You're still individually
>> > poor ass motherfuckers compared to us stupid Micks. HAHAHA, no wonder
>> > you're so fucking poor, you've no idea how ANY of this shit works, do
>> > you?
>>
>> You just don't understand plain logic, but luckily others do. I will
>> leave
>> this exactly as it is, so other can read and see you don't understand
>> even
>> the simplest logic. Ahahaha, incredible...Either you fake not to
>> understand
>> on purpose or you are even more stupid than I thought
>
> Great, I'm glad I gave you a second chance and you managed to fuck
> that up too. So you'd rather live in a country with $1 GDP and 100
> inhabitants (that's $0.01 each) than a country with $1 GDP and 10
> inhabitants (that's $0.10 each)? You'd actually prefer 1c to 10c?
> Didn't you tell me you were smart? You just DON'T LIKE MONEY? Ah, that
> explains your ditch living rat hunting lifestyle I guess.
First of all, TOOL, money has a different value depending on the nation you
live in. 1$ in Africa is not 1$ in USA. You buy a pair of shoes in Nigeria
with 1$, in USA you don't even buy condoms to put on your fucking Irish
dickhead, where a condom belongs. Secondly, money don't run my life. Having
less money but living where I like is perfectly fine with me. Would you
prefer having packs of money while being forced to live in a pit latrine?
This is how I'd feel living among illiterate, stupid arrogant micks in a
fucking stupid country such as Ireland. Sometimes less is better.
>> Of course the people who are getting the tourist's money are all the
>> same.
>> You don't have big corporations, big companies, the average Joe. No,
>> everyone spends his fucking money within Ireland, according to this
>> fucking
>> TOOL. Listen TOOL what if those happy bed and breakfast owners spend
>> their
>> money in FIAT stocks. Will the money still stay in Ireland? Will the
>> money
>> spent at McDonald's stay as a whole in Ireland? You got to be fucking
>> kidding, FOOL about every pence staying in Ireland. And since you can
>> count
>> only on 8 million tourists, you're getting definitely LESS money than we
>> are
>> doing. This is a FACT. If you had the same amount of tourism we have in
>> Italy, you micks would be millionaires, ideally splitting the cake just
>> in 4
>> millions.
>
> We don't have the same amount per capita. WE HAVE MORE YOU TWAT.
Because you are LESS you FOOL. Being LESS raises the PER CAPITA VALUES, can
you just understand something as mathematically simple as a FUCKING DIVISION
>> The fact there is more tourists per resident doesn't mean shit. What does
>> it
>> mean, that micks are friendly? You are the living proof micks have a
>> really
>> bad attitude and temper. And since when friendliness can be measured
>> mathematically? See what a stupid shit you are, you always mess up
>> measurable facts with stupid mick OPINIONS.
>
> Who needs to measure it mathematically. They come here and spend more
> money for each of us nice Micks. Thanks everybody!
How much money do the 8 millions spend while being in Ireland? How much
money do the 47 millions spend while being in Italy? Bring those figures. I
am still waiting. I asked about that 5 posts ago, but still you are UNABLE
to comply. When you are proven wrong, immediately numbers and maths make no
sense to you and you say they don't count shit. How come? Until 1 minute ago
you were sitting numbers after numbers. It's that because you don't accept
DEFEAT and you can't cover your tracks, TOOL ?
You said you micks piss on us Italian on regards of tourism. Then bring on
the figures. How much money those 8 million tourists brought in Ireland? How
much money do those Forty-Something millions brought in Italy? What are the
per capita values in regards of money brought?
>> I understand it perfectly, it you who can't get the fact your
>> unemployment
>> ratio is worse, but looks better because you micks are less. As I said,
>> using a simple proportion ( as thought in elementary school, do you micks
>> have elementary school? ), with the same amount of inhabitants as Italy,
>> but
>> keeping the same inhabitants/unemployed ratio, the unemployment rate in
>> Ireland would be 9,3%, which is pretty much shit.
>
> This is bullshit. If I lived in Italy I would have a higher chance of
> being unemployed because your country is shit.
Oh yeah, this is definitely intelligent and adult reasoning, backed up with
proofs. I would be unemployed because a country is shit. Why don't they
print this stuff on newspapers, I guess.
>> Learn maths, mick! And yes, I'd rather be unemployed in Italy - which I
>> am
>> not - than employed in Ireland, among micks and illiterate fucks like
>> you.
>
> With sums like that you'd make a great... nothing actually. You'd be a
> great pigfucker, but that's only a guess 'cos we don't have them here.
No, you have the pigfucked, you prefer to get fucked by pigs, rather than
fucking them.
>> Where does the UN fit in this discussion, tool? Do you know what the UN
>> are?
>> The G8 has nothing to do with the UN. Shooting yourself in the foot
>> again?
>> Showing what an illiterate fool you are again?
>
> G8, UN, who gives a fuck. You don't call the shots on shit anymore.
So you admit you don't even know the difference, illiterate fuck?
>> You can't really keep up with maths, huh? But let me answer your
>> question:
>> no, you're either owned or not, it's not measurable like potatoes or
>> Guinness piss like you do at the mick market. So you're still a loser
>> and,
>> of course, you're still my bitch.
>
> Hey, what happened to "Italy per capita GDP Total is 1,814 trillion
> ( 2008 estimate )"
> You never explained what "per capita GDP Total" is, did you? Did that
> just fucking disappear from history like all Italy's Jews, Rubber Il
> Dicke?
Oh, the Jews. I forgot that. Like I was born in 1920 and I am responsible of
anything. You really have no point anymore and you are using dead Jews to
further your moronic allegations and false assumptions. You are the first
one shitting on Jews here, because you bring them just to use them as a sort
of offense, to make you feel better.
What you have proven so far is that you are unable to even use the most
basic maths.You made an utter fool out of yourself saying that you can't
manage more than 8 million tourists, like they would come all at once in
your stupid country. You failed to do the most basic proportions, that show
your statistics and per capita rates are good only until the inhabitants of
your stupid island remain few, then you are off with Africa.
You can't tell the difference between the G8 and the UN. You repeteadly say
numbers are useless or pretend they are of the utmost importance, depending
whether the number side with your idiotic claims or not. You are a liar, a
scam and a conman. And, as I told you before, you've showed your true colors
here, and the main colour is brown and the scenario smells like shit.
Now that you are done embarassing yourself again over some stupid,
uninteresting tourism issues nobody here gives a fuck about, will you
actually say something related on the C65 or you just want to keep going
hijacking this thread, in spite of everyone here in comp.sys.cbm, to vent
your venom, post stupid shit and hence keep being my bitch, post after post?
:-)
Danny boy, you were done days ago, I told you. Just call it a day, you ain't
really going anywhere: you ain't winning new friends, you ain't winning a
single altercation. Go and grab a clue and make everyone happy, included
yourself, who definitely got the worst of it all :-)
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/25/2009 12:24:41 AM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:6e2b348d-e12b-4fee-8839-bcb7c6c72c66@r34g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
On May 21, 1:28 pm, Dombo <do...@disposable.invalid> wrote:
>> Nor did you tell us how hard you had to work to be able to afford to get
>> it enlarged, or were you already deformed at birth?
>
>Yeah, that's what my girlfriends call it, "deformed".
>Anyway, I never said it was my own penis. 4% formaldehyde in phosphate
>buffered saline will keep most human tissues looking display quality
>for years.
I don't know if it's really him or just an homonym, because this guy is too
young, but if it's the same Danny O'TOOL from Galway, Ireland, this picture
brings the discussion to a whole new level.
http://es.bebo.com/PhotoAlbumBig.jsp?PageNbr=1&MemberId=3312913603&PhotoAlbumId=7266485747&PhotoId=7266490406
Sucking, he is sucking on something, gay he looks gay. His hairs are covered
in smegma... What do you think, it could be really him?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/25/2009 1:11:16 AM
|
|
"Riccardo Rubini" <rubini@despammed.com> wrote ...
>
>
> That didn't happen, bro! You're the only one buttfucked here, you came in
> my web like a fucking useless fly and I am eating you alive.
Let's see. You say you eat live flies?
Score one point for O'Toole.
Now that both you guys are even at one point each, how about calling the rest
of the flamewar off before we get another thousand useless posts in this
thread.
--
Best regards,
Sam Gillett
Watch yourself, or your
reality check will bounce!
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Sam
|
5/25/2009 1:36:59 AM
|
|
"lyricalnanoha" <lyricalnanoha@usotsuki.hoshinet.org> wrote ...
> ANYWHO!!!!!
>
> *runs*
>
> I wonder how hard it would be to throw together a simple C65 emu in SDL?
> Maybe getting away from the baroqueness of MESS would make it easier to get
> a C65 emu that is a little more useful, not that the C65 was of very much
> use without software...
But! But! But the C65 was very useful without software, just like ENIAC and
the Babbage Engine! ;-)
--
Best regards,
Sam Gillett
Out of my mind. Back in 5 minutes!
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Sam
|
5/25/2009 2:17:29 AM
|
|
"Sam Gillett" <sgillettnospam@diespammergte.net> wrote in message
news:%CmSl.505$9L2.48@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
>
> "Riccardo Rubini" <rubini@despammed.com> wrote ...
>>
>>
>> That didn't happen, bro! You're the only one buttfucked here, you came in
>> my web like a fucking useless fly and I am eating you alive.
>
> Let's see. You say you eat live flies?
Well, what do you think spiders eat, Sam, chicken? :-)
> Score one point for O'Toole.
Nah, I don't think so :-)
> Now that both you guys are even at one point each, how about calling the
> rest of the flamewar off before we get another thousand useless posts in
> this thread.
Sorry Sam, my little irish bitch is not going to surrender until he's broken
down in smithereens.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/25/2009 5:20:56 AM
|
|
"Sam Gillett" <sgillettnospam@diespammergte.net> wrote in message
news:ZcnSl.397$Cc1.278@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
>
> "lyricalnanoha" <lyricalnanoha@usotsuki.hoshinet.org> wrote ...
>
>> ANYWHO!!!!!
>>
>> *runs*
>>
>> I wonder how hard it would be to throw together a simple C65 emu in SDL?
>> Maybe getting away from the baroqueness of MESS would make it easier to
>> get a C65 emu that is a little more useful, not that the C65 was of very
>> much use without software...
>
> But! But! But the C65 was very useful without software, just like ENIAC
> and the Babbage Engine! ;-)
Sam, you're twisting the facts here, although I know you're joking: I said
the C65 is part of computing history just like the ENIAC and the Babbage
Engine and thousand other machines that were built over the years. Don't you
agree with that?
Personally, I see the lack of software as an opportunity. If you think a
good 8-bit computer, with good specs such as the C65, is useless because you
can't download 1000 games off of Emucamp, C64.com or something, and you
can't figure out what to do with it by yourself, well, it's really your
fault or lack of imagination.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/25/2009 5:28:22 AM
|
|
In article <%CmSl.505$9L2.48@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>,
"Sam Gillett" <sgillettnospam@diespammergte.net> writes:
|>
|> Now that both you guys are even at one point each, how about calling the rest
|> of the flamewar off before we get another thousand useless posts in this
|> thread.
Actually, if it weren't for you distributing points I wouldn't have seen
any of their nonsense.
Rainer
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
buchty
|
5/25/2009 8:44:39 AM
|
|
On May 25, 6:20=A0am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> > Let's see. =A0You say you eat live flies?
>
> Well, what do you think spiders eat, Sam, chicken? :-)
>
> > Score one point for O'Toole.
>
> Nah, I don't think so :-)
Haha, even when one of the non-imaginary non-"on your side" fairy
people come here and show how you fucked up you're so fucking
delusional you just ignore it.
STILL NO EXPLANATION OF YOUR "PER CAPITA GDP TOTAL" DICKRUB.
Come on, you've invented an entirely new branch of economics. Aren't
you proud enough of that to tell us what that means, or even admit you
said it, chickenshit Rubber Dick?
And have you worked out that it doesn't matter a shit what the total
GDP is in a country? Here, wrap the septic slop in your skull around
this one.
India: GDP $3.267 trillion Per Capita: $2,800
Italy: GDP $1.821 trillion Per Capta: $31,000
Why don't you move to India and you could become an Indian Rubber
Dick! They've a much bigger GDP so it must be fucking great living
there for the average Indian, much better than Italy. Go on, do some
"proportion" bullshit to tell me the average Indian is better of than
the average Irishman. HAHAHAHA. That pain is called your pride getting
kicked to fuck Dickrub.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/25/2009 9:33:40 AM
|
|
On May 25, 12:14 am, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> > Great. If I ever need a border demo for the C65 I know where to call.
> > That's made my fucking day Dick Rubby.
>
> What part didn't you understand of what I wrote above, TOOL ? Looks like
> your IQ is even lower than the "great" Irish average :-))
I didn't understand the incomprehensible pointless bullshit you
postedabout the funet net archive that means diddly fuck to anybody on
earth. When there's more that a border demo and a disk utility in
there get back to us, OK Dickrubby?
And yes, if there's *ever* some more software there that'd be great.
> I suspect you're not even able to write a border demo. Please now tell us
> how do you change the border on the C64, in Basic and then in Assembly, just
> to show us at least some basic knowledge of a Commodore computer, for those
> who are wondering what the fuck are you doing in this group.
>
> Write a little BASIC program that does what the C65 demo does, changing the
> border in sequence, then do the same in Assembly. It's simple and the
> majority of us knows how to do it. This is more relevant to what
> comp.sys.cbm was meant for, than chatting about the tourist per capita the
> micks get, you know.. If you manage to show us some skills that match what
> such a loudmouth smartass is expected to have, it will work better than any
> other butt-kissing you've done so far.
10 for x=820 to 825 : read y : poke x,y: print x,y : next : sys 820
20 data 238, 32, 208, 76, 52, 3
Both BASIC and ML. Fuck you Rubber Dick.
> Oh, and don't worry. We will get back at your gibberish later. But now show
> us you can actually do something with a Commodore computer, other than
> saying it's shit and taking a crap on the work of some of the most respected
> engineers in the Commodore history.
>
> Go ahead, we are all awaiting to stand in awe at your actual skills.
Why don't you fuck yourself again with another question self fucker?
Be original and don't try the ancient do this next bullshit. I've done
what you said I couldn't and proved you a fucking asshole.
> P.S.http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/oct/11/guardianweeklytechno...
> Daniel (O')Tool(e) trolling on the guardian.co.uk, comparing a Commodore 64
> to a Mac, claiming nobody nowadays uses both kinds of computers.
Liar. Does that even bother an Italian sleazy slime bag shit calling
you that though? It's like "cheap ass", "coward" or "fascist". You
pretty much just accept it 'cos it's true.
What I said was:
"hardly anybody uses them"
No how does that translate into "nobody nowadays uses both kinds of
computers". It doesn't, does it, you lying cheating Italian Rubber
Dick.
> Looks like
> we really found some new troll to play with. Let's see how does he compare
> to the former ones.
Says the Champion Troll Of Poverty Shithole Italy. Go fuck yourself
AGAIN with another post that just inevitably ends up with you being
buttfucked.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/25/2009 3:16:04 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:25fac030-eb85-4753-b5fe-735f98552cca@k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> On May 24, 7:30 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> > "No you are!" AGAIN??? FFS can't you write your own stuff? Are you
>> > that fucking braindead?
>>
>> Don't get that irritated you're losing it, Danny. It's all your fault,
>> not
>> mine. It's you the braindead here, the Irish with a low IQ, don't forget
>> that :-))
>
> "It's you the braindead here"? What stunning originality. I'm waiting
> for your next scintillatin joke "no, you are times ten".
No, you are times twenty! Happy now? :-)
>> >> You said it's useless because it has no software. And I told you,
>> >> <snipped fucking lies>
>>
>> AHAHAH... Removing how I owned your ass to save your face. Let me copy
>> and
>> paste it once again for EVERYONE to read how stupid you are:
>
> They were lies. For want of a better phrase, you started it. I gave my
> opinion ON THE C65.
Which is LAUGHABLE to say the very least. Sorry, it's just plain and utter
STOOPID.
> You gave your opinion ON MY OPINIONS and added
> SOUR GRAPES.
Which is the TRUTH. You are so jealous, you had to shit on the job of very
talented people and offend those who were in luck to get one ( or more ) of
these computers, just because you are not one of these lucky ones. So you
kept saying that, basically, this computer is an useless piece of dung, it
belongs to computer history as much as your TI calculator does - and we
should accept that as "the truth", just because a fucking anaesthetist from
Galway, with no formal training in computer science, gives his fucked up
"opinion" whilst lacks the slightest imagination to forsee some kind of use
for a very nice 8-bit computer from the early 90's.
Even a hammer is useless, if you got no brains; it could be deadly in the
wrong hands, expecially in your case, given your propension to
sadomasochism, as shown in this whole thread, you could probably try it to
use it to bang some sense out of that empty skull. It's the man who turns an
hammer or a computer into something useful; if you can't see any use in a
C65 is because of lack of intelligence ( in typical Irish fashion: the
lowest IQ among rich European countries ) and, more than anything else,
absolute *lack of imagination*, which, given your five-years old insults,
fucked up logic and flat electroencephalogram induced wit, seems pretty
rampant and evident.
>You will get repeatedly buttfucked every single time you bring that up, so
>be my guest, it's your ass.
Wow, I will be buttfucked by Danny the TOOL. I guess NOT. Hey, how is
Professor John G. Laffey doing? Yeah, I mean, your the big head, the boss.
Do you think I should copy him these messages of yours? I think I should. He
should know what a fucking unstable loser was hired in his staff and your
colleagues deserve to know too. I guess some of them at NCBES were just
awaiting for this chance to bring in some other friend and kick *you* out.
Do these comments about "greasy, slimey Italians" represent the views of
your whole organization, that is National University of Ireland? This
question will reach these people.
In your venom filled posts there are plain racist comments, you have took a
crap on Italy and Italians starting with the utterly ridicoulous "killing
more babies" tale - which I guess will be a treat at your next symposium in
Italy. Just because I said "Irish" in no derogatory way a couple of times
you spat plain insults, reiterated personal attacks, brought in here enough
crazy nationalism to make Hitler look like an happy camper. You hijacked a
whole group and kept an attitude that is not supposed to belongs to a Post
Doctoral researcher of any respectable college, not even in fucking
Birmania. Is this what a lecturer teaches Irish students there? What kind of
example, as a lecturer, are you supposed to be to young people, being the
violent, aggressive mad hatter you are? A racist and nationalist lecturer.
Not bad for a college that is so proud about its diversity programs. This is
something I'd love to discuss with Dr. Browne via e-mail.
The icing on the cake is, to make my job even easier reporting all your
slander and offenses to the University of Galway, you were SO DUMB you
actually posted all these racist comments, insults and plain shit, from your
computer at NUI during fucking Office hours!!! WELL DONE, DANNY!!! You
certainly work hard there...Will your lenghty post prove someone else can
actually warm your seat there better than you do, without embarassing the
whole institution in the process? I am quite sure you have some rules there
about Internet abuse, and I'd love to hear from your IT department. Every
organization has its own rules, true, but I guess posting racist comments
and nationalist slander is hardly permitted anywhere. I don't think your
University condones the abuse of Internet to post nationalist and racist
propaganada over usenet.
Oh, you felt so cool when you brought up that quote about keeping 14 inches
dicks in 4% formaldehyde in phosphate buffered saline. Thanks for the
hint...At the same time, *you* should have got the hint I was up doing
something and tracking you down, when I joked about your degree not being
related enough to computing. Thanks for eating my bait.
I was honest with you from the start: the more you talk, the more weapons
you give me, at the end, one way or the other, I will FUCK YOU UP.
>> You said it's useless because it has no software. And I told you, the
>> difference engine is useless too maybe, because it has no software
>>
>> AHAHAHAH... Danny, should we also scratch Babbage's name off of computing
>> history books?
>
> Why do you keep imagining that "no software" line saves your ass in
> the slightest. The Babbage Engine isn't useless without software. The
> C65 pretty much is. You can't and won't find anywhere I've
> contradicted that because you are a useless Dick.
>
>> Oh, I DID! People can scroll back and see I did answer a ZILLION times.
>>
>> [snipped irrelevant venom and insults from the low IQ gifted irishman
>> loser ]
>
> Wow, you just did a big hissy fit about that, didn't you?
Actually when I saw the first blabbering in capitals I moved on. I mean, I
don't really give a shit what you think of me, go figure if I do a "big
hissy fit" about what an unknown, faceless guy said on Usenet... I mean, who
the fuck are you? Tomorrow I will be facing another troll, and I will forget
about you, like I forgot about some other fool who actually ended up in
jail, after flaming and overexposing himself on the Italian usenet hierarchy
last year. To me, it ends up being just a cat and mouse game, me being the
cat. And when playing this sick game, as Tony Montana said: "you fuck with
me? You're fucking with the best" :-)))
>> AHAHAH, you know you are not accepted and nobody gives a fuck about you,
>
> Except the two guys who posted to support my position. Oh, gosh darn,
> haven't I just shat on your theory. So sorry.
Oh, gosh darn, holy crap Batman! I guess the only thing you have shat so
far is your pants :-)))
>> and
>> your best shot at people's approval here was winning this war of words
>> with
>> me. Well, I have news for you, mick. You failed. You have lost this war
>> of
>> words long ago and won no approval, you just won people's despise and
>> laughter at your back. You can't pretend it's not happening, but deep
>> inside
>> you know it's true: you made an utter clown out of yourself and just look
>> to
>> others as being my bitch.
>
> Whereas the only people willing to go on record here about the C65
> think YOU'RE wrong.
Who said I was wrong? Nobody, no man, no woman, zip, niet, nada, nothing.
There is not one single message of someone who said openly I was wrong.
There is a message coming from "Dragos", aka a fucking tool who has been
promoted by Wildstar - LMAO - as the new troll and laughing stock of
comp.sys.cbm !!! This fool comes here saying the C65 is shit: he owns it and
it's shit. I told him to sell it, I mean why keep something you don't like
when you can draw a few thousand. Such a pity I smelled his claim about
owning one was utter bollocks a mile away!!!
> It's amazing that a guy with so many imaginary friends that whisper
> into his ear all the time can't come up with anything more witty than
> "no, you are" as an insult.
>
>> No, that's not my style. That's yours, Danny. I suggest anybody to read
>> back
>> and see how, at this point of the war you miserably lost
>
> Or they could check the parts where you had to admit you fucked up,
> like where Croatia and Greece are,
Never happened. I was just considering "rich" Europe but I didn't specify
that, writing just Europe, without "rich" in front of it. Oh, a typo. This
is all you have. One fucking typo. It's needless to say you have never stood
a fucking case from the start, Danny boy. And now you're completely fucked.
Remember me joking about the Irish turkey? Now you are burned out.
>or telling us that Ireland is in
> Great Britain. Or that Ireland is more expensive than Italy.
Indeed, I said Ireland is cheaper!!! Yes!!! You apparently take great pride
in teabagging your own balls, eh? It's just a few messages ago that you came
with figures about Dublin being much much more expensive than Rome - hence
being "best" - something perfectly in line with your very LOW IQ. Did you
just shoot yourself in the foot again, Danny? Or is it just another case of
foot in mouth ?
> Yup, you
> won every single one of those self mutilating fuck ups didn't you.
> Ask mummy for a new pillowcase when you've finished crying.
Ask mammy for your old bedroom, when you're finished losing your job, after
being marked with fire as the racist and a nationalist lecturer of the
National University of Ireland. You have only one choice: fucking disappear,
tool. Leave this place for good, pretending it doesn't exist and never come
back. One more post and... Do you know how cheap a fax over the Internet is,
these days? :-))
Bye, bye, Danny. I hope the coal mines will greet you warmly ROTFL
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/25/2009 9:22:13 PM
|
|
HAHAHA, you just KNOW someone's been fucked by LOGIC real bad to the
point where the know they haven't a prayer when they start googling
the guy who's shitting on them.
Well done Rubber Dick. You're that guy!
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/25/2009 9:52:00 PM
|
|
So all along you thought the MESS emulator was pretty good? Why the
fuck were you moaning about it then?
******************************************************************************
Riccardo Rubini
Guest
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Commodore 65
xlar54 wrote:
> Hey folks... was just surfing around, and ran into MESS, that
> "everything but the kitchen sink" computer emulator thats been
> around.. I pretty much stick with VICE when it comes to Commodore
> emulation, but what caught my eye was the C65 emulation that it
> apparently has. Has anyone played around with this? It would be
> interesting to see what they had in mind with the C65 if the
> emulation is usable.
As far as I can tell, owning a few C65 units, the emulator is as good
as the
real thing. Sometimes people blame the MESS emulator for being
"unfinished",
but, in reality, it's the other way round...The real machine is
unfinished.
The emulator merely reflects how a real C65 would behave. For example,
even
a real C65 crashes abruptly in the middle of something or locks up
with no
reason, expecially if you're using the earlier firmwares.
So I suggest you to use the emulator, if you're curious about the C65,
it
works averagely good.
Riccardo
******************************************************************************
WTF is this Dick?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/25/2009 9:56:17 PM
|
|
>The icing on the cake is, to make my job even easier reporting all your
>slander and offenses to the University of Galway, you were SO >DUMB you
>actually posted all these racist comments, insults and plain shit, from >your
>computer at NUI during fucking Office hours!!! WELL DONE, >DANNY!!!
HAHAHAHA, how the fuck would you know when I work or not? You know
jack except how to google a name Dick.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/25/2009 10:18:25 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:2ec416af-bfa8-49f6-9775-ada959f6563e@r37g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
> HAHAHA, you just KNOW someone's been fucked by LOGIC real bad to the
> point where the know they haven't a prayer when they start googling
> the guy who's shitting on them.
That was done the first day! I just kept you going on going, otherwise the
game would have ended on day one. Now I have a thick list of verbal diarrhea
to send Dr. Laffey AND your colleagues in CC. You are shitting on the image
of the National University of Ireland, the idea we got here is professors
there at NUI are just mad hatters with too much time on their hands who play
flame festivals on Usenet or collect dicks in formaldehyde. What kind of
publicity and service do you believe you have done so far to the National
University of Ireland? These questions will be sent to your boss.
> Well done Rubber Dick. You're that guy!
I'm THE guy, and you've been OWNED to the point of no return, bitch! Owned
to the point your personal information became public, to the point your job
career can be tainted, to the point even your own students, in the future,
can make a link between the NUI, you and your nationalist slander and racist
propaganda. Talk about shit staining a reputation...More than an
anesthesician you look like someone whose brian has been anesthesized. But
it's all good, Danny. In a few weeks you'll be running a new series of
experiments on fart ignition in your bedroom. You can lecture your dog about
it. ROTFL
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/25/2009 10:20:57 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:3bd014af-58b3-40e7-af0a-8831e909dcc1@o18g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
> >The icing on the cake is, to make my job even easier reporting all your
>>slander and offenses to the University of Galway, you were SO >DUMB you
>>actually posted all these racist comments, insults and plain shit, from
>> >your
>>computer at NUI during fucking Office hours!!! WELL DONE, >DANNY!!!
>
> HAHAHAHA, how the fuck would you know when I work or not? You know
> jack except how to google a name Dick.
Drum roll: the answer is: Your IP !
Posting bullshit from the Office on Monday at 11.33 ( Office hours ) via
Google Groups IP 140.203.81.96, Latitude/Longitude 53.272 / -9.049, ISP
"University College Galway", Ireland Galway.
Posting bullshit from home, on Sunday, at 20.03, again posted via Google
Groups, IP is 79.97.132.239, ISP is NTL communications IRELAND LTD.
I can report your racist and nationalist slander to three abuse services:
1st, the Google Groups' abuse, which usually does work. Secondly, NTL
communications IRELAND's abuse. Lastly, University of Galway's abuse. Again,
the more you desperately try to save your face in this flame YOU LOST FROM
DAY ONE, the more you FUCK UP.
HAHAHAHAH, the last laughter is mine once again, TOOL. Last laughter at your
UTTER IGNORANCE is ALWAYS mine.
Keep posting, TOOL!!!
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/25/2009 10:31:48 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:a1899732-a6ac-4c7c-aae7-18ea0d15f120@l12g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
> So all along you thought the MESS emulator was pretty good? Why the
> fuck were you moaning about it then?
>
> ******************************************************************************
> Riccardo Rubini
> Guest
>
> Posts: n/a
>
> Default Re: Commodore 65
> xlar54 wrote:
>> Hey folks... was just surfing around, and ran into MESS, that
>> "everything but the kitchen sink" computer emulator thats been
>> around.. I pretty much stick with VICE when it comes to Commodore
>> emulation, but what caught my eye was the C65 emulation that it
>> apparently has. Has anyone played around with this? It would be
>> interesting to see what they had in mind with the C65 if the
>> emulation is usable.
>
> As far as I can tell, owning a few C65 units, the emulator is as good
> as the
> real thing. Sometimes people blame the MESS emulator for being
> "unfinished",
> but, in reality, it's the other way round...The real machine is
> unfinished.
> The emulator merely reflects how a real C65 would behave. For example,
> even
> a real C65 crashes abruptly in the middle of something or locks up
> with no
> reason, expecially if you're using the earlier firmwares.
>
> So I suggest you to use the emulator, if you're curious about the C65,
> it
> works averagely good.
>
> Riccardo
> ******************************************************************************
>
> WTF is this Dick?
A message from 2006, three years ago. You fail at a proper quote, that's
because you're incapable to properly use a copy/paste function on your
computer, it seems.At the time I had been using older firmware ROMs and the
C65 was unstable as much as the MESS. You know, over three years, opinions
might change...Meanwhile, I got some of the latest firmwares made available
for this machine and I figured out later the computer's developement was
going quite good by November 1991...
You're quite fucked up if all you can come up with, in another useless
attempt to save your face, is a message from three fucking years ago. Why do
you refuse older statistics but yet accept three years old messages as being
indefinitely valid? Both things get equally old and outdated.
I wonder how much ass kissing you did to get hired ad NUI. Given your
moronic statements, if doesn't seem like you got a job there for
intelligence merits........
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/25/2009 11:08:25 PM
|
|
Riccardo Rubini schreef:
> <daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
> news:2ec416af-bfa8-49f6-9775-ada959f6563e@r37g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>> Well done Rubber Dick. You're that guy!
>
> I'm THE guy, and you've been OWNED to the point of no return, bitch! Owned
> to the point your personal information became public,
Well he did make it quite easy for you, didn't he? Your personal
information could be quite easily become public as well. How about to
call it quits? This flamewar is rather unoriginal, repetitive and
boring. Frankly, I expected a bit more from a self proclaimed flamewar
master against a guy who has an obvious obsession with penises.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Dombo
|
5/25/2009 11:11:08 PM
|
|
"Dombo" <dombo@disposable.invalid> wrote in message
news:4a1b2591$0$28146$5fc3050@news.tiscali.nl...
> Riccardo Rubini schreef:
>> <daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
>> news:2ec416af-bfa8-49f6-9775-ada959f6563e@r37g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>>> Well done Rubber Dick. You're that guy!
>>
>> I'm THE guy, and you've been OWNED to the point of no return, bitch!
>> Owned to the point your personal information became public,
>
> Well he did make it quite easy for you, didn't he? Your personal
> information could be quite easily become public as well.
I have so many homonyms, even in my own city, that I don't really give a
fuck. Others tried in the past 10 years and they all failed. I am not
registered on any social networks and I have no domain registered to my
name. So...
> How about to call it quits? This flamewar is rather unoriginal,
> repetitive and boring.
I agree with you on the unoriginal, repetitive and boring. But I am not
playing a tennis match against a wall on my own, pal. There are other
variables I have no control on...
> Frankly, I expected a bit more from a self proclaimed flamewar master
> against a guy who has an obvious obsession with penises.
I have to be honest with you, this flame has been strange. This guy has
absolutely zero intellectual honesty, I never saw anyone so stupid and
irrational as him. Also, he is just like one of those hard turds that your
toilet can't flush and he's adamant getting broken to smithereens before
hitting the sewer. It must be something Irish.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/25/2009 11:25:52 PM
|
|
Riccardo Rubini
View profile
More options Mar 12 2004, 1:17 pm
Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm
From: "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:17:03 GMT
Local: Fri, Mar 12 2004 1:17 pm
Subject: Re: Commodore One News?
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
| Report this message | Find messages by this author
Such girls are not easy to find? Come to my University in Rome, you'll
find
Ah, but you said elsewhere you moved, didn't you? Do you think we can
find out where to?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/26/2009 12:04:30 AM
|
|
"Riccardo Rubini" <rubini@despammed.com> wrote ...
>
> Personally, I see the lack of software as an opportunity. If you think a
> good 8-bit computer, with good specs such as the C65, is useless because
> you can't download 1000 games off of Emucamp, C64.com or something, and you
> can't figure out what to do with it by yourself, well, it's really your
> fault or lack of imagination.
Ah yes, imagination. Imagine this: We place a C65 on one side of the room,
and a Sinclair Spectrum on the other. Then we have the "War of the
Doorstops" ;-)
--
Best regards,
Sam Gillett
He who laughs last thinks slowest!
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Sam
|
5/26/2009 12:40:04 AM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:8c123e9d-9bcb-424a-9b3b-58697bdf8874@n21g2000vba.googlegroups.com...
> Riccardo Rubini
> View profile
> More options Mar 12 2004, 1:17 pm
> Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm
> From: "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com>
> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:17:03 GMT
> Local: Fri, Mar 12 2004 1:17 pm
> Subject: Re: Commodore One News?
> Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original
> | Report this message | Find messages by this author
>
> Such girls are not easy to find? Come to my University in Rome, you'll
> find
>
> Ah, but you said elsewhere you moved, didn't you? Do you think we can
> find out where to?
I guess so. Actually, it's very easy to say where I am now. But since you're
a fucking tool, you won't figure it out. Anyway, what is your point, fucking
O'Boon?
Hey dind't you just say this a couple of shit-messages ago:
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:25fac030-eb85-4753-b5fe-735f98552cca@k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> HAHAHA, you just KNOW someone's been fucked by LOGIC real bad to the
> point where the know they haven't a prayer when they start googling
> the guy who's shitting on them.
I didn't have much time to get in touch with big ole' John, you know, during
Office hours I am busing working, not watching porn at the expenses of some
college, but be assured it's gonna happen, tool. Ask around,
O'Anaesthesia...When I can fuck up someone, I defintely and mercilessly do
it.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/26/2009 3:22:21 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:d716a40b-5a83-42c3-b11d-14d75827a2d0@r13g2000vbr.googlegroups.com...
>> Write a little BASIC program that does what the C65 demo does, changing
>> the
>> border in sequence, then do the same in Assembly. It's simple and the
>> majority of us knows how to do it. This is more relevant to what
>> comp.sys.cbm was meant for, than chatting about the tourist per capita
>> the
>> micks get, you know.. If you manage to show us some skills that match
>> what
>> such a loudmouth smartass is expected to have, it will work better than
>> any
>> other butt-kissing you've done so far.
>
> 10 for x=820 to 825 : read y : poke x,y: print x,y : next : sys 820
> 20 data 238, 32, 208, 76, 52, 3
>
> Both BASIC and ML. Fuck you Rubber Dick.
Such a pity I did ask for Basic and ASSEMBLY, tool! Since when ASSEMBLY =
ML? You are such an utter, clueless ignorant fuck you don't even know the
difference between ML and Assembly. Congratulations, O'Anaesthesia
So, lay down that copy of COMPUTE!'s gazette, you pasted this shit piece of
code from, and write and comment your own code. It's trivial, still you
can't do it. So this is your homework for today, Professor O'Teabagged.
>> P.S.http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/oct/11/guardianweeklytechno...
>> Daniel (O')Tool(e) trolling on the guardian.co.uk, comparing a Commodore
>> 64
>> to a Mac, claiming nobody nowadays uses both kinds of computers.
>
> Liar. Does that even bother an Italian sleazy slime bag shit calling
> you that though? It's like "cheap ass", "coward" or "fascist". You
> pretty much just accept it 'cos it's true.
> What I said was:
> "hardly anybody uses them"
Which means you'd be surprised if someone still uses them, and you
implicitly state nobody really uses them anymore. Which, said about the
Macintosh, is another LAUGHABLE pile of bovine manure.. You seem to have a
problem with your own language, Dr. O'Shite. Poor students, I can only
imagine what a mess a lecture of yours is: half truths, fucked up logic,
wrong words, plain and utter illiteracy. Imagine the confusion in people's
mind, you'd be able to make a lesson on fart-fire reaction be as difficult
to comprehend as one on nuclear fusion.
> No how does that translate into "nobody nowadays uses both kinds of
> computers". It doesn't, does it, you lying cheating Italian Rubber
> Dick.
Go back to school. Elementary school. We don't speak phenol-formaldehydeise
here, we speak international English, Dr. O'Shite.
>> Looks like
>> we really found some new troll to play with. Let's see how does he
>> compare
>> to the former ones.
>
> Says the Champion Troll Of Poverty Shithole Italy. Go fuck yourself
> AGAIN with another post that just inevitably ends up with you being
> buttfucked.
You obsession with penises and sodomy is second only to your UTTER
IGNORANCE, Compute!'s magazine boy: You can't even tell the difference
between assembly and machine language, making for the n-th time an complete
and clueless village idiot out of yourself, still you have to guts to claim
of owning anyone. LOL... I told you: you suck, O'Tripe - and you're my
bitch.
Riccardo
P.S. Thanks for posting more racist slander from your university account,
AGAIN. Ole' John is gonna be real proud of you, so your poor colleagues.
God, it must really hard for all these people to keep up with your lying,
nonsensical shit.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/26/2009 3:49:42 PM
|
|
On May 26, 4:49 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
> Such a pity I did ask for Basic and ASSEMBLY, tool! Since when ASSEMBLY =
> ML? You are such an utter, clueless ignorant fuck you don't even know the
> difference between ML and Assembly. Congratulations, O'Anaesthesia
So you're saying I can do ML but I can't do assembly? WTF?
> So, lay down that copy of COMPUTE!'s gazette, you pasted this shit piece of
> code from, and write and comment your own code. It's trivial, still you
> can't do it. So this is your homework for today, Professor O'Teabagged.
I told you you'd just come up with some other bullshit task. Go fuck
yourself.
> >> P.S.http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/oct/11/guardianweeklytechno...
> >> Daniel (O')Tool(e) trolling on the guardian.co.uk, comparing a Commodore
> >> 64
> >> to a Mac, claiming nobody nowadays uses both kinds of computers.
>
> > Liar. Does that even bother an Italian sleazy slime bag shit calling
> > you that though? It's like "cheap ass", "coward" or "fascist". You
> > pretty much just accept it 'cos it's true.
> > What I said was:
> > "hardly anybody uses them"
>
> Which means you'd be surprised if someone still uses them,
Yet again WTF? How the fuck could I miss people still using them when
there's a million C64 forums out there? You're banned from most of
them I'd imagine, but then again you seem to be banned from just about
everything.
> and you
> implicitly state nobody really uses them anymore. Which, said about the
> Macintosh, is another LAUGHABLE pile of bovine manure.. You seem to have a
> problem with your own language, Dr. O'Shite.
Yet again WTF? What 2% or 3% of computer users? That's "hardly
anybody".
> Poor students, I can only
> imagine what a mess a lecture of yours is: half truths, fucked up logic,
> wrong words, plain and utter illiteracy. Imagine the confusion in people's
> mind, you'd be able to make a lesson on fart-fire reaction be as difficult
> to comprehend as one on nuclear fusion.
Again, snore.
> Go back to school. Elementary school. We don't speak phenol-formaldehydeise
> here, we speak international English, Dr. O'Shite.
Where "hardly anyone" is the same as "nobody"? HAHAHA.
> P.S. Thanks for posting more racist slander from your university account,
> AGAIN. Ole' John is gonna be real proud of you, so your poor colleagues.
> God, it must really hard for all these people to keep up with your lying,
> nonsensical shit.
Try them. I'd consider sending them a mail as follows:
Dear College Computer Services,
My name is Dick, and I'm one of the world's most famous trolls. Any
quick google will reveal that I've been banned from everywhere
possible for trolling and flaming. I am also a self-confessed racist
and I hate Irish people who I think are idiots (I can provide evidence
if you want). Nevertheless, on usenet, which you might remember from
20 years ago, somebody said something bad about me so I'd like you to
care.
See how that goes for you. And, knowing them, ask them for a few CDs
of porn too and they'll sort you out.
I'm sure, with the help of tin.it records, the police they'll have
little trouble locating you in a city of only 90,000. Maybe my Irish
friend Sean Tracey would even have a return address for you?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/26/2009 7:21:49 PM
|
|
Riccardo Rubini schreef:
> "Dombo" <dombo@disposable.invalid> wrote in message
> news:4a1b2591$0$28146$5fc3050@news.tiscali.nl...
>> Riccardo Rubini schreef:
>>> <daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
>>> news:2ec416af-bfa8-49f6-9775-ada959f6563e@r37g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>>>> Well done Rubber Dick. You're that guy!
>>> I'm THE guy, and you've been OWNED to the point of no return, bitch!
>>> Owned to the point your personal information became public,
>> Well he did make it quite easy for you, didn't he? Your personal
>> information could be quite easily become public as well.
>
> I have so many homonyms, even in my own city, that I don't really give a
> fuck. Others tried in the past 10 years and they all failed. I am not
> registered on any social networks and I have no domain registered to my
> name. So...
Isn't c-65.com yours?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Dombo
|
5/26/2009 7:56:45 PM
|
|
On May 26, 8:56=A0pm, Dombo <do...@disposable.invalid> wrote:
> Isn't c-65.com yours?
It is yeah, but is home address and phone number just TOO much for a
flamewar? :-)
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
daniel
|
5/26/2009 8:08:47 PM
|
|
"Dombo" <dombo@disposable.invalid> wrote in message
news:4a1c4983$0$28138$5fc3050@news.tiscali.nl...
> Riccardo Rubini schreef:
>> "Dombo" <dombo@disposable.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:4a1b2591$0$28146$5fc3050@news.tiscali.nl...
>>> Riccardo Rubini schreef:
>>>> <daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
>>>> news:2ec416af-bfa8-49f6-9775-ada959f6563e@r37g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>>>>> Well done Rubber Dick. You're that guy!
>>>> I'm THE guy, and you've been OWNED to the point of no return, bitch!
>>>> Owned to the point your personal information became public,
>>> Well he did make it quite easy for you, didn't he? Your personal
>>> information could be quite easily become public as well.
>>
>> I have so many homonyms, even in my own city, that I don't really give a
>> fuck. Others tried in the past 10 years and they all failed. I am not
>> registered on any social networks and I have no domain registered to my
>> name. So...
>
> Isn't c-65.com yours?
They can have homos`ur us!
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
me
|
5/26/2009 8:15:50 PM
|
|
Go Wank!
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
me
|
5/26/2009 8:20:58 PM
|
|
"Dombo" <dombo@disposable.invalid> wrote in message
news:4a1c4983$0$28138$5fc3050@news.tiscali.nl...
>> Riccardo Rubini schreef:
>> I have so many homonyms, even in my own city, that I don't really give a
>> fuck. Others tried in the past 10 years and they all failed. I am not
>> registered on any social networks and I have no domain registered to my
>> name. So...
>
> Isn't c-65.com yours?
Not anymore. It expired on the 15th of March and, as per now, I have no will
to renew it. Anyway, my old contact information from 2006, obviously
outdated, should still be visible. My email on yahoo.it probably required
just a google search to be found so... :-)
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/26/2009 8:32:53 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:c3bc49eb-1dff-4f9b-8940-08e15c9c3062@h11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On May 26, 8:56 pm, Dombo <do...@disposable.invalid> wrote:
> > Isn't c-65.com yours?
>
>It is yeah, but is home address and phone number just TOO much for a
>flamewar? :-)
Oh I am scared shitless!!! :-))
You can even post that phone number here, if you wish. Oh and I have yours
obviously, which I guess is alive, contrary to a phone number I had 3 years
ago.. Just for your information, that phone company uses to reassign phone
numbers after their SIM cards have not been used for some months. So, if
some angry Italian tells you to fuck off, it's not my fault. But, hey,
O'Shite, you are probably accustomed to that kind of rough love so, go ahead
and do your phone call! :-))
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/26/2009 8:43:10 PM
|
|
Have you heard of email..dipshit?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
me
|
5/26/2009 8:53:01 PM
|
|
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:5048b27c-a0e2-439b-a2f1-e574805b2160@j18g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
> On May 26, 4:49 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> P.S. Thanks for posting more racist slander from your university account,
>> AGAIN. Ole' John is gonna be real proud of you, so your poor colleagues.
>> God, it must really hard for all these people to keep up with your lying,
>> nonsensical shit.
>
> Try them. I'd consider sending them a mail as follows:
O'Tripe, don't be worried. I never really had any intentions to write those
people, it was a bluff, so take a deep breath. If I had more time, I'd play
with my C65 or do something else instead than harassing people who probably
are hard workers.
The reason I brought that stuff up is to show you nobody is really safe
behind a monitor and that, all your unjustified anger and resentment was
potentially going to bring you no good. You had been running this personal
crusuade against me because you had another "flame war" with me months ago
and you were still looking for some kind of revenge. In this process, you
managed to spoil your name and identity.
Can you answer a question in all honesty? Do you think all this was really
worth it, just to call some Internet guy some names? You take yourself
really seriously, if you get mad over a "sour grapes" statement, but still
you don't take seriously the possible consequences of your anger. Why?
> See how that goes for you. And, knowing them, ask them for a few CDs
> of porn too and they'll sort you out.
I'll leave that to you, it's you the one here who seems the most obsessed
with that stuff.
> I'm sure, with the help of tin.it records, the police they'll have
> little trouble locating you in a city of only 90,000.
Definitely not, if the city I live were of only 90.000. But that's not the
case.
> Maybe my Irish friend Sean Tracey would even have a return address for
> you?
I guess he doesn't, but anyway, I hope you stand a case, because not only an
international lawsuit is expensive, but you have to consider a
counterlawsuit would come immediately after you. If you lose, you are going
to pay all the expenses, and much more.
Riccardo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Riccardo
|
5/26/2009 9:46:58 PM
|
|
ML is pure binary. MLM = ML Monitor -> ML opcodes represented in
hexadecimal. The absolute closest to pure ML.
Assembly = slightly higher based on the fact that you write program code in
text and the code is often savable to text but can be saved into actual ML.
So the product of both is an ML program. Assembly doesn't "compile" source
per se in any sense. The conversion is mostly changing a mneumonic to an
actual binary value and that is called "assemble".
ML Monitor is basically right on the mark with hexadecimal values being
numeric values that is stored practically in natural form.
<daniel.otoole@ucd.ie> wrote in message
news:5048b27c-a0e2-439b-a2f1-e574805b2160@j18g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
> On May 26, 4:49 pm, "Riccardo Rubini" <rub...@despammed.com> wrote:
>> Such a pity I did ask for Basic and ASSEMBLY, tool! Since when ASSEMBLY =
>> ML? You are such an utter, clueless ignorant fuck you don't even know the
>> difference between ML and Assembly. Congratulations, O'Anaesthesia
>
> So you're saying I can do ML but I can't do assembly? WTF?
>
>> So, lay down that copy of COMPUTE!'s gazette, you pasted this shit piece
>> of
>> code from, and write and comment your own code. It's trivial, still you
>> can't do it. So this is your homework for today, Professor O'Teabagged.
>
> I told you you'd just come up with some other bullshit task. Go fuck
> yourself.
>
>> >> P.S.http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/oct/11/guardianweeklytechno...
>> >> Daniel (O')Tool(e) trolling on the guardian.co.uk, comparing a
>> >> Commodore
>> >> 64
>> >> to a Mac, claiming nobody nowadays uses both kinds of computers.
>>
>> > Liar. Does that even bother an Italian sleazy slime bag shit calling
>> > you that though? It's like "cheap ass", "coward" or "fascist". You
>> > pretty much just accept it 'cos it's true.
>> > What I said was:
>> > "hardly anybody uses them"
>>
>> Which means you'd be surprised if someone still uses them,
>
> Yet again WTF? How the fuck could I miss people still using them when
> there's a million C64 forums out there? You're banned from most of
> them I'd imagine, but then again you seem to be banned from just about
> everything.
>
>> and you
>> implicitly state nobody really uses them anymore. Which, said about the
>> Macintosh, is another LAUGHABLE pile of bovine manure.. You seem to have
>> a
>> problem with your own language, Dr. O'Shite.
>
> Yet again WTF? What 2% or 3% of computer users? That's "hardly
> anybody".
>
>> Poor students, I can only
>> imagine what a mess a lecture of yours is: half truths, fucked up logic,
>> wrong words, plain and utter illiteracy. Imagine the confusion in
>> people's
>> mind, you'd be able to make a lesson on fart-fire reaction be as
>> difficult
>> to comprehend as one on nuclear fusion.
>
> Again, snore.
>
>> Go back to school. Elementary school. We don't speak
>> phenol-formaldehydeise
>> here, we speak international English, Dr. O'Shite.
>
> Where "hardly anyone" is the same as "nobody"? HAHAHA.
>
>> P.S. Thanks for posting more racist slander from your university account,
>> AGAIN. Ole' John is gonna be real proud of you, so your poor colleagues.
>> God, it must really hard for all these people to keep up with your lying,
>> nonsensical shit.
>
> Try them. I'd consider sending them a mail as follows:
>
> Dear College Computer Services,
> My name is Dick, and I'm one of the world's most famous trolls. Any
> quick google will reveal that I've been banned from everywhere
> possible for trolling and flaming. I am also a self-confessed racist
> and I hate Irish people who I think are idiots (I can provide evidence
> if you want). Nevertheless, on usenet, which you might remember from
> 20 years ago, somebody said something bad about me so I'd like you to
> care.
>
> See how that goes for you. And, knowing them, ask them for a few CDs
> of porn too and they'll sort you out.
>
> I'm sure, with the help of tin.it records, the police they'll have
> little trouble locating you in a city of only 90,000. Maybe my Irish
> friend Sean Tracey would even have a return address for you?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Rick
|
5/27/2009 4:25:06 PM
|
|
"Rick Balkins" <rickbalkins.nospam@nospam.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:XOdTl.119735$3k7.67366@newsfe17.iad...
> ML is pure binary. MLM = ML Monitor -> ML opcodes represented in
> hexadecimal. The absolute closest to pure ML.
> Assembly = slightly higher based on the fact that you write program code
> in text and the code is often savable to text but can be saved into actual
> ML. So the product of both is an ML program. Assembly doesn't "compile"
> source per se in any sense. The conversion is mostly changing a mneumonic
> to an actual binary value and that is called "assemble".
>
> ML Monitor is basically right on the mark with hexadecimal values being
> numeric values that is stored practically in natural form.
Ignore last paragraph, not worded right. Rushed.
Put it simply, MLM works right from the development environment at about as
close as it gets to native binary. Each hexadecimal number is recorded to
binary fairly natively.
Assembly works at a slightly higher development environment but the result
is either text source or ML program.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Rick
|
5/27/2009 4:35:27 PM
|
|
|
204 Replies
211 Views
(page loaded in 0.898 seconds)
|