I know that I'm being annoiying by bugging all of you about TempC, but
I still believe in TempC.   TempC Simple is a watered-down version of
TempC for DOS and can create C modules for you.  I think it's faster
to use TempC Simple DOS than typing all your program's #includes and
basic structure yourself.  TempC Simple is in its alpha stages and has
limited functionality but shows its intended functionality.  Just make
sure you select the cc65 compiler--the others are unwritten.  If you
want to try it out, e-mail me for a copy.  My e-mail address is
maspethrose7@aol.com.  If you e-mail me, please start the subject with
"To Joseph:" as I share my e-mail address.
-------------------
Joseph Rose, a.k.a. Harry Potter
Working magic in the computer community...or at least striving to! :(

I think Harry Potter *is* on crack!

-uso.

Harry Potter wrote:
> I know that I'm being annoiying

....and your coding skills are about as useful as a concrete tampon. 

On 27/11/2010 10:33 AM, Harry Potter wrote:
> I know that I'm being annoiying by bugging all of you about TempC, but
> I still believe in TempC.   TempC Simple is a watered-down version of
> TempC for DOS and can create C modules for you.  I think it's faster
> to use TempC Simple DOS than typing all your program's #includes and
> basic structure yourself.  TempC Simple is in its alpha stages and has
> limited functionality but shows its intended functionality.  Just make
> sure you select the cc65 compiler--the others are unwritten.  If you
> want to try it out, e-mail me for a copy.  My e-mail address is
> maspethrose7@aol.com.  If you e-mail me, please start the subject with
> "To Joseph:" as I share my e-mail address.
> -------------------
> Joseph Rose, a.k.a. Harry Potter
> Working magic in the computer community...or at least striving to! :(

Here's my take:

* continuing to post when even you yourself have identified that you are 
annoying - UNFORGIVABLE!
* trying to peddle the same wares for years that *nobody* is even 
slightly interested in - UNFORGIVABLE!!
* writing pointless programs in the first place - UNFORGIVABLE!!!
* sharing an email address in this day and age - PRICELESS!!!!  :-)

When are you going to realise that the magic your striving towards just 
isn't there?

Most software engineers try and find a market and write software for it. 
You've written the software (ahem, said very tongue in cheek) and are 
trying to create the market. You've got it all backwards. Even if you 
sincerely believed you were onto something, surely by now you would have 
realised the truth of it.

Hey wait a minute, why did I just waste 2 minutes of my life writing 
this.... argh!

Cheers,
Mike

-- 

Mike Stephens
Central Coast, Australia

Find my Apple II projects online at:
http://apple2.sytes.net/

On Nov 26, 5:33=A0pm, Harry Potter <maspethro...@aol.com> wrote:
> I know that I'm being annoiying by bugging all of you about TempC, but
> I still believe in TempC. =A0 TempC Simple is a watered-down version of
> TempC for DOS and can create C modules for you. =A0I think it's faster
> to use TempC Simple DOS than typing all your program's #includes and
> basic structure yourself. =A0TempC Simple is in its alpha stages and has
> limited functionality but shows its intended functionality. =A0Just make
> sure you select the cc65 compiler--the others are unwritten. =A0If you
> want to try it out, e-mail me for a copy. =A0My e-mail address is
> maspethro...@aol.com. =A0If you e-mail me, please start the subject with
> "To Joseph:" as I share my e-mail address.
> -------------------
> Joseph Rose, a.k.a. Harry Potter
> Working magic in the computer community...or at least striving to! :(

It's amazing how often you keep bringing this program up, even though
you yourself have said, back in May in comp.sys.cbm, that two people
had tried it and said it was a bad idea. With all the negative
feedback you've gotten both there and here since you first mentioned
this program I would think that by now you'd understand that nobody is
interested in it.

In fact someone in comp.sys.cbm made the suggestion that you should
just create the program for yourself and make it work the way you want
it to. If you can do that, and are happy with it yourself, then you've
accomplished what you wanted.

Dean

"Polymorph" <mike.a.stephens@gmail.com> wrote:
>* continuing to post when even you yourself have identified that you are 
>annoying - UNFORGIVABLE!

Sorry Mike. I try to control myself...

>* trying to peddle the same wares for years that *nobody* is even slightly 
>interested in - UNFORGIVABLE!!

Shoot! Sorry again Mike.

>* writing pointless programs in the first place - UNFORGIVABLE!!!

Got me again! Darn! Sorry Mike.

>* sharing an email address in this day and age - PRICELESS!!!!  :-)

Ooops... now so darned sorry you can't believe it!

>When are you going to realise that the magic your striving towards just 
>isn't there?

Well you may as well take over in here then... because from the sounds of 
things we aren't ever going to work magic in the community together or even 
strive to...

>Hey wait a minute, why did I just waste 2 minutes of my life writing 
>this.... argh!

Dunno... I was surprised that you did so I felt it was my duty to respond.

Cheers,

Bill 

Once more unto the breach...not only are you annoying us by trying to
pester us into using TempC despite its general uselessness, you are
annoying us because you CANNOT let go of the idea that if you just
write a program that everybody uses, you will win the Internet
Popularity Contest. Even if that were how it works (hint: it's not,)
all you ever do is post threads asking whether you should create some
program or other and would anybody use it and would somebody finally
love me? If any of these ideas really mattered to you, you'd write
them anyway, regardless of whether people were begging you to.

"commodorejohn" <commodorejohn@gmail.com> wrote:
>Once more unto the breach...

String 'im up on the yardarm! Make 'im walk the plank!

>not only are you annoying us by trying to pester us into using TempC 
>despite its general uselessness, you are annoying us because you CANNOT let 
>go of the idea that if you just
write a program that everybody uses, you will win the Internet Popularity 
Contest.

He's got my vote for perhaps the longest running disorderly polarity in a 
6502 newsgroup and for striving magically into the MS-DOS and C language 
sigs as well... despite the sporadic frequency of his posts.

>Even if that were how it works (hint: it's not,) all you ever do is post 
>threads asking whether you should create some program or other and would 
>anybody use it and would somebody finally love me?

Your negative attention is true love!

>If any of these ideas really mattered to you, you'd write them anyway, 
>regardless of whether people were begging you to.

Which is prescisely what he has done.

Take Care,

Bill

Bill Buckels
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bill_Buckels

Apple Oldies by Bill Buckels (and others)
http://www.appleoldies.ca/index.htm

The CP/M 86 and CP/M 80 Museum
http://www.cpm8680.com/index.htm

The Official Aztec C Online Museum
http://www.aztecmuseum.ca/index.htm

Classic C64 Software Written and Produced by Bill Buckels
http://www.c64classics.ca/index.htm

The Mostly MS-DOS Software Museum Mostly by Bill Buckels
http://www.teacherschoice.ca/index.htm

Ye Olde Clip Shoppe Download Page
http://www.clipshop.ca/index.htm

The Little Grindstone Harbour Website
http://www.grindstoneharbour.com/

On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Bill Buckels wrote:

>> If any of these ideas really mattered to you, you'd write them anyway,
>> regardless of whether people were begging you to.
>
> Which is prescisely what he has done.

You give him WAY too much credit.

-uso.

"Steve Nickolas" <lyricalnanoha@usotsuki.hoshinet.org> wrote:
>You give him WAY too much credit.

Just kidding. 

On Nov 27, 9:58=A0pm, "Bill Buckels" <bbuck...@mts.net> wrote:
> "Polymorph" <mike.a.steph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >* continuing to post when even you yourself have identified that you are
> >annoying - UNFORGIVABLE!
>
> Sorry Mike. I try to control myself...
>
> >* trying to peddle the same wares for years that *nobody* is even slight=
ly
> >interested in - UNFORGIVABLE!!
>
> Shoot! Sorry again Mike.
>
> >* writing pointless programs in the first place - UNFORGIVABLE!!!
>
> Got me again! Darn! Sorry Mike.
>
> >* sharing an email address in this day and age - PRICELESS!!!! =A0:-)
>
> Ooops... now so darned sorry you can't believe it!
>
> >When are you going to realise that the magic your striving towards just
> >isn't there?
>
> Well you may as well take over in here then... because from the sounds of
> things we aren't ever going to work magic in the community together or ev=
en
> strive to...
>
> >Hey wait a minute, why did I just waste 2 minutes of my life writing
> >this.... argh!
>
> Dunno... I was surprised that you did so I felt it was my duty to respond=
..
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bill

Sounds like you're a very "sorry" individual...  ;-)

"Polymorph" <mike.a.stephens@gmail.com> wrote:
>Sounds like you're a very "sorry" individual...  ;-)

Not so much... 

On Nov 26, 6:33=A0pm, Harry Potter <maspethro...@aol.com> wrote:
> I know that I'm being annoiying by bugging all of you about TempC, but
> I still believe in TempC. =A0 TempC Simple is a watered-down version of
> TempC for DOS and can create C modules for you. =A0I think it's faster
> to use TempC Simple DOS than typing all your program's #includes and
> basic structure yourself. =A0TempC Simple is in its alpha stages and has
> limited functionality but shows its intended functionality. =A0Just make
> sure you select the cc65 compiler--the others are unwritten. =A0If you
> want to try it out, e-mail me for a copy. =A0My e-mail address is
> maspethro...@aol.com. =A0If you e-mail me, please start the subject with
> "To Joseph:" as I share my e-mail address.
> -------------------
> Joseph Rose, a.k.a. Harry Potter
> Working magic in the computer community...or at least striving to! :(

You keep on talking about but why not post the link so people can
download it? Unless you are going to charge for it. Are you going to
charge for it?

Op 29-Nov-10 14:44, Michael schreef:
> On Nov 26, 6:33 pm, Harry Potter<maspethro...@aol.com>  wrote:
>> I know that I'm being annoiying by bugging all of you about TempC, but
>> I still believe in TempC.   TempC Simple is a watered-down version of
>> TempC for DOS and can create C modules for you.  I think it's faster
>> to use TempC Simple DOS than typing all your program's #includes and
>> basic structure yourself.  TempC Simple is in its alpha stages and has
>> limited functionality but shows its intended functionality.  Just make
>> sure you select the cc65 compiler--the others are unwritten.  If you
>> want to try it out, e-mail me for a copy.  My e-mail address is
>> maspethro...@aol.com.  If you e-mail me, please start the subject with
>> "To Joseph:" as I share my e-mail address.
>> -------------------
>> Joseph Rose, a.k.a. Harry Potter
>> Working magic in the computer community...or at least striving to! :(
>
> You keep on talking about but why not post the link so people can
> download it? Unless you are going to charge for it. Are you going to
> charge for it?

Do you expect that he would give way that brilliant piece of software 
for free?

On Nov 26 2010, 11:33=A0pm, Harry Potter <maspethro...@aol.com> wrote:
> I know that I'm being annoiying by bugging all of you about TempC, but
> I still believe in TempC. =A0 TempC Simple is a watered-down version of
> TempC for DOS and can create C modules for you. =A0I think it's faster
> to use TempC Simple DOS than typing all your program's #includes and
> basic structure yourself. =A0TempC Simple is in its alpha stages and has
> limited functionality but shows its intended functionality. =A0Just make
> sure you select the cc65 compiler--the others are unwritten. =A0If you
> want to try it out, e-mail me for a copy. =A0My e-mail address is
> maspethro...@aol.com. =A0

If it's as good as your main Template Generator, this will change 8
bit software development forever!