Newbie :- whats the best cbm64 emulator for windows ? also does anyone have a list of the best weblinks

  • Follow


hi , whats the best cbm64 emulator for windows ? also does anyone have a
list of the best weblinks so i can keep upto date with the cbm64 scene .

would be great to get back into some of my old favorites.


0
Reply Just 1/18/2005 10:54:05 PM

> hi , whats the best cbm64 emulator for windows ? also does anyone have a
> list of the best weblinks so i can keep upto date with the cbm64 scene .

There are two emulators for Windows which are more popular than the 
others: CCS64 and WinVICE. I personally prefer WinVICE because it has a 
nicer GUI but CCS is very good, too. WinVICE ist free, CCS64 is 
shareware (30 US$).

CCS64: http://www.computerbrains.com/ccs64/
WinVICE: http://www.viceteam.org/

For scene news you can start at www.c64.sk which is a very good news 
portal. www.lemon64.com is another popular place to visit. But there are 
many more.

0
Reply de 1/18/2005 11:36:16 PM


"Just Wondering" wrote ...
> hi , whats the best cbm64 emulator for windows ? also does anyone have a
> list of the best weblinks so i can keep upto date with the cbm64 scene .

Not everyone agrees about which emulator is the best one, but many lean
toward VICE.

Here are a few links to get you started.  Some of these sites/pages will have
links to other sites.


http://www.faqs.org/faqs/commodore/main-faq/part1/
 comp.sys.cbm general FAQ

http://www.ros.com.au/~errol/64.html
 Errol Smith's Commodore page.  Good utilities.
 (d64it, d128it, unzip64, and unzip128)

http://www.q-link.cc/commodor.shtml
 Snakeman's Commodore Website

http://www.q-link.cc/c128game.shtml
 C128 Games on Snakeman's website

http://www.ramblehouse.com/loadstarcompleat.htm
 Place to purchase Loadstar Compleat ($30.00)

http://www.csbruce.com/~csbruce/cbm/lrr/
 Little Red Reader (v2.70) & Tiny Yellow Brother

http://project64.c64.org/index.htm
 Docs for Commodore hardware/software

http://project64.c64.org/textonly.htm
 Text start page for Project 64

http://www.zimmers.net/bbs/
 Commodore BBS Program Information

http://www.floodgap.com/retrobits/ckb/secret/history.html
 Commodore History

http://www.floodgap.com/retrobits/ckb/
 Commodore Knowledge Base

http://personalpages.tds.net/~rcarlsen/
 Commodore repair info by Ray Carlsen

http://personalpages.tds.net/~rcarlsen/cbm/desolder.txt
 How to remove a chip!

http://www.armory.com/~spectre/cwi/
 Computer Workshops - HyperLink download

http://www.dtvhacking.info/
 Info on C64DTV Joystick (includes game list.)

You can also find URL buried in many of the signatures on this news group.
-- 
Best regards,

Sam Gillett

Change is inevitable,
except from vending machines!



0
Reply Sam 1/19/2005 12:21:47 AM

"Just Wondering" <Nospam@thank.you.com> wrote in message 
news:hsgHd.10$cN6.0@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...
> hi , whats the best cbm64 emulator for windows ? also does anyone have a
> list of the best weblinks so i can keep upto date with the cbm64 scene .
>
> would be great to get back into some of my old favorites.

1.  There are repeated posts about this subject to this and the other C64 
related groups.

2.  This really _isn't_ an appropriate post to this group.  You should post 
this kind of question to comp.emulators.cbm.

3.  Oh dear, I see that you already have.  Cross-posting is also generally a 
no-no, especially where it is off topic.

Personally, I wouldn't have answered your question because it was so rudely 
made (three strikes *tsk tsk*).  Please track-down and try to abide by 
usenet etiquette.  We have trouble enough here with one certain individual; 
people may not be so toleratant.


Daniel. 


0
Reply Daniel 1/19/2005 12:27:20 AM

Daniel England <mewpokemon@iinetdotnetdotau> wrote:
> 1.  There are repeated posts about this subject to this and the other C64 
> related groups.
> 
> 2.  This really _isn't_ an appropriate post to this group.  You should post 
> this kind of question to comp.emulators.cbm.
> 
> 3.  Oh dear, I see that you already have.  Cross-posting is also generally 
> a no-no, especially where it is off topic.
> 
> Personally, I wouldn't have answered your question because it was so rudely 
> made (three strikes *tsk tsk*).  Please track-down and try to abide by 
> usenet etiquette.  We have trouble enough here with one certain individual; 
> people may not be so toleratant.

While I wholeheartedly agree with Daniel, I'd also like to welcome the
OP back to the C= community. You're welcome with any Commodore specific
questions to this group, but please post emualtor questions in more
appropriate places. The forum at Lemon64 (http://www.lemon64.com/forum)
is a good place to start, as is the relevant emualtor newsgroups.

Oh, and get a *real* C64. Much more fun than an emulator ;-)

-- 
Niklas Ramsberg
aka
< .
    (:)  Bacon    http://www.baconman.nu
< .               Go to my homepage for my real email address.
0
Reply bacon 1/19/2005 7:38:13 AM

Daniel England wrote:

> "Just Wondering" <Nospam@thank.you.com> wrote in message 
> news:hsgHd.10$cN6.0@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...
> 
>>hi , whats the best cbm64 emulator for windows ? also does anyone have a
>>list of the best weblinks so i can keep upto date with the cbm64 scene .
>>
>>would be great to get back into some of my old favorites.
> 
> 1.  There are repeated posts about this subject to this and the other C64 
> related groups.
> 
> 2.  This really _isn't_ an appropriate post to this group.  You should post 
> this kind of question to comp.emulators.cbm.
> 
> 3.  Oh dear, I see that you already have.  Cross-posting is also generally a 
> no-no, especially where it is off topic.
> 
> Personally, I wouldn't have answered your question because it was so rudely 
> made (three strikes *tsk tsk*).  Please track-down and try to abide by 
> usenet etiquette.  We have trouble enough here with one certain individual; 
> people may not be so toleratant.

Aren't you being a bit harsh? The questions seems to be perfectly 
reasonable for this group. They have been asked before, and will be 
asked again; that is the nature of newsgroups. It is not reasonable to 
expect that someone new to this group knows what has been discussed in 
the past. If only posts about subjects that haven't been discussed 
before were allowed in this group, I don't think we would see much 
traffic here. It would be nice if there were a good, up-to-date, FAQ for 
comp.sys.cbm, but to my knowledge there is none. comp.emulators.cbm may 
have been a better place to ask these questions, but many postings I 
have seen here are far less topical than this one.

-- 
Peter van Merkerk
peter.van.merkerk(at)dse.nl
0
Reply Peter 1/19/2005 7:19:21 PM

"Peter van Merkerk" wrote ...

> Daniel England wrote:
>
>> "Just Wondering" <Nospam@thank.you.com> wrote in message
>> news:hsgHd.10$cN6.0@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...
>>
>>>hi , whats the best cbm64 emulator for windows ? also does anyone have a
>>>list of the best weblinks so i can keep upto date with the cbm64 scene .
>>
>> 1.  There are repeated posts about this subject to this and the other C64
>> related groups.
>>
>> 2.  This really _isn't_ an appropriate post to this group.  You should
>> post this kind of question to comp.emulators.cbm.
>>
>> 3.  Oh dear, I see that you already have.  Cross-posting is also generally
>> a no-no, especially where it is off topic.
>>
>> Personally, I wouldn't have answered your question because it was so
>> rudely made (three strikes *tsk tsk*).  Please track-down and try to abide
>> by usenet etiquette.  We have trouble enough here with one certain
>> individual; people may not be so toleratant.
>
> Aren't you being a bit harsh? The questions seems to be perfectly
> reasonable for this group. They have been asked before, and will be
> asked again; that is the nature of newsgroups. It is not reasonable to
> expect that someone new to this group knows what has been discussed in
> the past. If only posts about subjects that haven't been discussed
> before were allowed in this group, I don't think we would see much
> traffic here. It would be nice if there were a good, up-to-date, FAQ for
> comp.sys.cbm, but to my knowledge there is none. comp.emulators.cbm may
> have been a better place to ask these questions, but many postings I
> have seen here are far less topical than this one.

I have to say that I agree with Peter.  While this is no place for an
in-depth discussion of emulators, a simple question with a simple answer does
not hurt anything.  Also, flaming a newbie is certainly no way to welcome him
to the newsgroup.  In my opinion (please note the word "opinion") the best
way to kill a newsgroup is to insist that 100 percent of the posts be 100
percent on topic.

FYI, before I hit the send button, I intend to put on my asbestos suit!
;-)
-- 
Best regards,

Sam Gillett

Change is inevitable,
except from vending machines!





0
Reply Sam 1/19/2005 9:37:12 PM


"Daniel England" -

No offense, but your a pompass ass for even attempting to make your point 
known. (cross posting or not)

NEVER EVER DENY A COMMODORE PERSON! (or wannabe)

Cyberjank



"Daniel England" <mewpokemon@iinetDOTnetDOTau> wrote in message 
news:41eda973$0$31114$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
> "Just Wondering" <Nospam@thank.you.com> wrote in message 
> news:hsgHd.10$cN6.0@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...
>> hi , whats the best cbm64 emulator for windows ? also does anyone have a
>> list of the best weblinks so i can keep upto date with the cbm64 scene .
>>
>> would be great to get back into some of my old favorites.
>
> 1.  There are repeated posts about this subject to this and the other C64 
> related groups.
>
> 2.  This really _isn't_ an appropriate post to this group.  You should 
> post this kind of question to comp.emulators.cbm.
>
> 3.  Oh dear, I see that you already have.  Cross-posting is also generally 
> a no-no, especially where it is off topic.
>
> Personally, I wouldn't have answered your question because it was so 
> rudely made (three strikes *tsk tsk*).  Please track-down and try to abide 
> by usenet etiquette.  We have trouble enough here with one certain 
> individual; people may not be so toleratant.
>
>
> Daniel.
> 


0
Reply jhdf 1/22/2005 7:55:05 AM

7 Replies
105 Views

(page loaded in 0.223 seconds)


Reply: