I have read that there was an article in The Computer Journal (1993)
issue #63 or 64 for addition of real time clock circuit to Kaypro 10.
I have been unable to find this info online anywhere.
www links to TCJ appear to be outdated or site is offline now.
Does anyone have this info that may be posted, or a link to the
articles?
Thanks,
Bubba
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Bubba
|
4/8/2004 8:31:10 PM |
|
'Lo Bubba:
Group: comp.sys.cbm Date: Thu, Apr 8, 2004, 4:31pm (CDT+1) From:
Smelly@hotmail.com (Bubba=A0Jones)
script:
>I have read that there was an article
>in The Computer Journal (1993) issue
>#63 or 64 for addition of real time clock
>circuit to Kaypro 10.
This is "kinda" OT for this group. :-))
If you don't get any responses here, try comp.os.cpm.
salaam,
dowcom
--
To e-mail me, add the character zero to "dowcom". i.e.:
dowcom(zero)(at)webtv(dot)net.
http://community.webtv.net/dowcom/DOWCOMSAMSTRADGUIDE
MSWindows is television,=85 Linux is radar.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
dowcom
|
4/9/2004 8:05:04 AM
|
|
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 03:05:04 -0500, dowcom@webtv.net (bud) wrote:
>
>'Lo Bubba:
>
>Group: comp.sys.cbm Date: Thu, Apr 8, 2004, 4:31pm (CDT+1) From:
>Smelly@hotmail.com (Bubba�Jones)
>
>script:
>
>>I have read that there was an article
>>in The Computer Journal (1993) issue
>>#63 or 64 for addition of real time clock
>>circuit to Kaypro 10.
>
>This is "kinda" OT for this group. :-))
>
>If you don't get any responses here, try comp.os.cpm.
>
>salaam,
>dowcom
I posted here in error.
I read this group & comp.os.cpm in my newsreader
Bubba,
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Bubba
|
4/9/2004 12:48:12 PM
|
|
Bubba Jones wrote:
> I have read that there was an article in The Computer Journal (1993)
> issue #63 or 64 for addition of real time clock circuit to Kaypro 10.
>
> I have been unable to find this info online anywhere.
>
> www links to TCJ appear to be outdated or site is offline now.
>
> Does anyone have this info that may be posted, or a link to the
> articles?
Oops. You're looking for
comp.os.cpm
This is
comp.sys.cbm
:)
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Kelli
|
4/11/2004 5:44:02 AM
|
|