The AMIGA is dead and the C64 still lives

  • Follow


Inredible that a crappy machine as the C64 survived the more advanced,
but also very crappy AMIGA.

Nobody wants AMIGAs anymore, nobody buys AMIGA games and hardware is
cheap on ebay - C64 stuff is much more expensive !

I predict that in hundreds of years some idiots will still use C64 and
Spectrum , but AMIGA already is DEAD !

RIP AMIGA !
0
Reply masheg_solea (7) 9/23/2003 9:28:39 PM

> Inredible that a crappy machine as the C64 survived the more advanced,
> but also very crappy AMIGA.
> 
> Nobody wants AMIGAs anymore, nobody buys AMIGA games and hardware is
> cheap on ebay - C64 stuff is much more expensive !
> 
> I predict that in hundreds of years some idiots will still use C64 and
> Spectrum , but AMIGA already is DEAD !
> 
> RIP AMIGA !

I predict that in hundreds of years, some idiots will still be posting
idiotic comments on the net (in whatever form it may exist at that
time).

--Eric
0
Reply Eric 9/23/2003 4:19:32 PM


D: pwned D:

"Eric Haines" <eahaines@localnet.DOT.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:3F70B8E3.MD-1.4.4.eahaines@localnet.DOT.com...
> > Inredible that a crappy machine as the C64 survived the more advanced,
> > but also very crappy AMIGA.
> >
> > Nobody wants AMIGAs anymore, nobody buys AMIGA games and hardware is
> > cheap on ebay - C64 stuff is much more expensive !
> >
> > I predict that in hundreds of years some idiots will still use C64 and
> > Spectrum , but AMIGA already is DEAD !
> >
> > RIP AMIGA !
>
> I predict that in hundreds of years, some idiots will still be posting
> idiotic comments on the net (in whatever form it may exist at that
> time).
>
> --Eric


0
Reply Me 9/24/2003 1:52:38 PM


> From: masheg_solea@yahoo.com.hk (Carl Philtmoon)
> Subject: The AMIGA is dead and the C64 still lives
  
> Incredible that a crappy machine as the C64 survived the more advanced,
> but also very crappy AMIGA.

You forgot to mention most of an endless string of Mac and really crappy PC
variants .. along with their related operating systems.. and don't forget:
ALL the Ataris, Tandys, Apples, ...

LOL

d.

 
 

0
Reply Don 9/25/2003 12:57:08 AM

There is one born every minute, and this "Carl Philtmoon" has a full 60 
minutes worth.......

Carl Philtmoon wrote:
> Inredible that a crappy machine as the C64 survived the more advanced,
> but also very crappy AMIGA.
> 
> Nobody wants AMIGAs anymore, nobody buys AMIGA games and hardware is
> cheap on ebay - C64 stuff is much more expensive !
> 
> I predict that in hundreds of years some idiots will still use C64 and
> Spectrum , but AMIGA already is DEAD !
> 
> RIP AMIGA !

0
Reply Mike 9/25/2003 3:35:24 PM

masheg_solea@yahoo.com.hk (Carl Philtmoon) wrote in message news:<26e9ab06.0309231328.577c5df4@posting.google.com>...
> Inredible that a crappy machine as the C64 survived the more advanced,
> but also very crappy AMIGA.
> 
> Nobody wants AMIGAs anymore, nobody buys AMIGA games and hardware is
> cheap on ebay - C64 stuff is much more expensive !
> 
> I predict that in hundreds of years some idiots will still use C64 and
> Spectrum , but AMIGA already is DEAD !
> 
> RIP AMIGA !


lol rofl lol !!!1!!11!!!1!! LONG LIVE Cummodor !!!!1!!111
llololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololol

p.s.
Agnus Manwhoring is fucking gay. ( just look at his pix on his site )
0
Reply koft_ 9/25/2003 11:42:55 PM

On 25 Sep 2003 16:42:55 -0700, koft_@hotmail.com (Koft) wrote:

[SNIP]

> Agnus Manwhoring is fucking gay.

Koft you really are a sad immature little boy, aren't you. Even if your
allegation were true (which I don't believe since Angus is married with
children) what would it matter. Gay or Straight Angus is a far better person
than you.

0
Reply John 9/26/2003 1:13:18 AM

John Burns <joobs@grizo.free-onlinenojunk.co.uk> scribbled the following
on comp.sys.amiga.games:
> On 25 Sep 2003 16:42:55 -0700, koft_@hotmail.com (Koft) wrote:

> [SNIP]

>> Agnus Manwhoring is fucking gay.

> Koft you really are a sad immature little boy, aren't you. Even if your
> allegation were true (which I don't believe since Angus is married with
> children) what would it matter. Gay or Straight Angus is a far better person
> than you.

Koft's one of those people who think that being homosexual is the worst
thing that a person can be, it nullifies every virtue in the entire
personality. He's one of those who, if he were himself called gay, would
most likely punch the speaker in the face, instead of politely
correcting him by saying "No, actually I'm straight".

-- 
/-- Joona Palaste (palaste@cc.helsinki.fi) ---------------------------\
| Kingpriest of "The Flying Lemon Tree" G++ FR FW+ M- #108 D+ ADA N+++|
| http://www.helsinki.fi/~palaste       W++ B OP+                     |
\----------------------------------------- Finland rules! ------------/
"Remember: There are only three kinds of people - those who can count and those
who can't."
   - Vampyra
0
Reply Joona 9/26/2003 6:26:01 AM

On 23 Sep 2003 14:28:39 -0700, masheg_solea@yahoo.com.hk (Carl
Philtmoon) wrote:

>Inredible that a crappy machine as the C64 survived the more advanced,
>but also very crappy AMIGA.
>
>Nobody wants AMIGAs anymore, nobody buys AMIGA games and hardware is
>cheap on ebay - C64 stuff is much more expensive !
>
>I predict that in hundreds of years some idiots will still use C64 and
>Spectrum , but AMIGA already is DEAD !
>
>RIP AMIGA !
You are braindead. Amiga is so much better than stinky C64. C64 is
nothing but a games console, taotal crap, shitty graphics, sound etc..
Its hard if not impossible to connect HDD, monitor, ... to it. And
what would you do with it anyway? 
Amiga is a real computer, with real OS and multitasking, great
graphics and sound, great options for expanding.

0
Reply Orange 9/26/2003 8:48:22 AM

On 25-Sep-03 23:42:55, Koft said

>lol rofl lol !!!1!!11!!!1!! LONG LIVE Cummodor !!!!1!!111
>llolololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololo
>lolololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololol
>ololololololololololololololololololololol

>p.s.
>Agnus Manwhoring is fucking gay. ( just look at his pix on his site )

Ooh! Ouch! Gosh, but that hurts.

Sorry to people that have had these posts inflicted on them, but after
you've checked the alleged damning evidence  :-/  as long as you're on the
website you might want to check out the AGDB and perhaps contribute a
review of an Amiga game.

Thanks to Koft for providing me with the opportunity of making an on-topic
plug.   :)


                  All the best,
                        Angus Manwaring.       (for e-mail remove ANTISPEM)

I need your memories for the Amiga Games Database: A collection of Amiga
Game reviews by Amiga players http://www.angusm.demon.co.uk/AGDB/AGDB.html

0
Reply Angus 9/26/2003 1:01:43 PM

On 26 Sep 2003 06:26:01 GMT, Joona I Palaste wrote:

> Koft's one of those people who think that being homosexual is the worst
> thing that a person can be, it nullifies every virtue in the entire
> personality. He's one of those who, if he were himself called gay, would
> most likely punch the speaker in the face, instead of politely correcting
> him by saying "No, actually I'm straight".

Yeah It just shows the mentality of these people who think that calling someone
gay is the worst thing in the world.

0
Reply John 9/27/2003 12:53:49 AM

Orange wrote ...

>On 23 Sep 2003 14:28:39 -0700, masheg_solea@yahoo.com.hk (Carl
>Philtmoon) wrote:
>
>>I predict that in hundreds of years some idiots will still use C64 and
>>Spectrum , but AMIGA already is DEAD !
>>
>>RIP AMIGA !
>You are braindead. Amiga is so much better than stinky C64. C64 is
>nothing but a games console, taotal crap, shitty graphics, sound etc..
>Its hard if not impossible to connect HDD, monitor, ... to it. And
>what would you do with it anyway?
>Amiga is a real computer, with real OS and multitasking, great
>graphics and sound, great options for expanding.

Is this a case of troll #2 answering troll #1, or did Carl Philtmoon morph
into Orange, in which case troll #1 was answered by troll #1?

Best regards,

Sam Gillett aka Mars Probe @ Starship Intrepid 1-972-221-4088
     Usenet email address is dead until current wave of
     viruses is over.  Email is being deleted from server
     without reading.




0
Reply Sam 9/27/2003 3:45:17 AM

"Sam Gillett" <samgillett@msn.com> wrote in message
news:hJ7db.12552$Wd7.5586@nwrddc03.gnilink.net...
>
> Orange wrote ...
>
> >On 23 Sep 2003 14:28:39 -0700, masheg_solea@yahoo.com.hk (Carl
> >Philtmoon) wrote:
> >
> >>I predict that in hundreds of years some idiots will still use C64 and
> >>Spectrum , but AMIGA already is DEAD !
> >>
> >>RIP AMIGA !
> >You are braindead. Amiga is so much better than stinky C64. C64 is
> >nothing but a games console, taotal crap, shitty graphics, sound etc..
> >Its hard if not impossible to connect HDD, monitor, ... to it. And
> >what would you do with it anyway?
> >Amiga is a real computer, with real OS and multitasking, great
> >graphics and sound, great options for expanding.
>
> Is this a case of troll #2 answering troll #1, or did Carl Philtmoon morph
> into Orange, in which case troll #1 was answered by troll #1?
>
STEAK TASTES GOOD!

Time for beer.

RaYzor


0
Reply RaYzor 9/27/2003 4:00:15 AM

John Burns is a gay!
"John Burns" <joobs@grizo.free-onlineNOJUNK.co.uk> wrote in message
news:9400113277641070.NC-1.59.joobs@news.free-online.net...
> On 26 Sep 2003 06:26:01 GMT, Joona I Palaste wrote:
>
> > Koft's one of those people who think that being homosexual is the worst
> > thing that a person can be, it nullifies every virtue in the entire
> > personality. He's one of those who, if he were himself called gay, would
> > most likely punch the speaker in the face, instead of politely
correcting
> > him by saying "No, actually I'm straight".
>
> Yeah It just shows the mentality of these people who think that calling
someone
> gay is the worst thing in the world.
>


0
Reply El 9/27/2003 6:15:46 PM

On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 20:15:46 +0200, "El-Master" wrote:

> John Burns is a gay!

Oooh luvvy, still it's better than being a moron who top posts. Anyway you guys
can't have it both ways Fat Tim was trying to insult me recently about shagging
fat birds so which is it?

> "John Burns" <joobs@grizo.free-onlineNOJUNK.co.uk> wrote in message

> > Yeah It just shows the mentality of these people who think that calling
> someone gay is the worst thing in the world.

0
Reply John 9/28/2003 2:54:18 AM

I apolagise everyone who I insolted. Couldn't resist.
Still, it's not good being gay. Amiga's not dead!
I want to buy it, I am buying it.
Don't send more gay posts.
This is Amiga group, who's with me!?!!
Oh, well...


0
Reply El 9/28/2003 10:41:46 AM

On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 03:45:17 GMT, "Sam Gillett" <samgillett@msn.com>
wrote:

>
>Orange wrote ...
>
>>On 23 Sep 2003 14:28:39 -0700, masheg_solea@yahoo.com.hk (Carl
>>Philtmoon) wrote:
>>
>>>I predict that in hundreds of years some idiots will still use C64 and
>>>Spectrum , but AMIGA already is DEAD !
>>>
>>>RIP AMIGA !
>>You are braindead. Amiga is so much better than stinky C64. C64 is
>>nothing but a games console, taotal crap, shitty graphics, sound etc..
>>Its hard if not impossible to connect HDD, monitor, ... to it. And
>>what would you do with it anyway?
>>Amiga is a real computer, with real OS and multitasking, great
>>graphics and sound, great options for expanding.
>
>Is this a case of troll #2 answering troll #1, or did Carl Philtmoon morph
>into Orange, in which case troll #1 was answered by troll #1?
>
Only trolls are the ones in your head.
0
Reply Orange 9/29/2003 2:21:04 PM

Orange wrote ...

>Only trolls are the ones in your head.

Sorry, but they aren't in my head.  They are on my news server (and yours
too).

Best regards,

Sam Gillett aka Mars Probe @ Starship Intrepid 1-972-221-4088
     Usenet email address is dead until current wave of
     viruses is over.  Email is being deleted from server
     without reading.




0
Reply Sam 9/30/2003 2:09:13 AM

Why did anyone bother answering this prick in the 1st place?
And fuck with the top posting - it makes much more sense to read new replies
at to top.

"Orange" <orange@drenik.net_REMOVE> wrote in message
news:5ms7nvcv6ivcpgh5qp8vr6e9hpscdnsh38@4ax.com...
> On 23 Sep 2003 14:28:39 -0700, masheg_solea@yahoo.com.hk (Carl
> Philtmoon) wrote:
>
> >Inredible that a crappy machine as the C64 survived the more advanced,
> >but also very crappy AMIGA.
> >
> >Nobody wants AMIGAs anymore, nobody buys AMIGA games and hardware is
> >cheap on ebay - C64 stuff is much more expensive !
> >
> >I predict that in hundreds of years some idiots will still use C64 and
> >Spectrum , but AMIGA already is DEAD !
> >
> >RIP AMIGA !
> You are braindead. Amiga is so much better than stinky C64. C64 is
> nothing but a games console, taotal crap, shitty graphics, sound etc..
> Its hard if not impossible to connect HDD, monitor, ... to it. And
> what would you do with it anyway?
> Amiga is a real computer, with real OS and multitasking, great
> graphics and sound, great options for expanding.
>


0
Reply Ray 10/7/2003 12:15:32 AM

On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 01:15:32 +0100, "Ray Norrish" wrote:

> Why did anyone bother answering this prick in the 1st place? And fuck with
> the top posting - it makes much more sense to read new replies at to top.

Fair enough Ray but you could also just have snipped the crap instead of letting
us download it all again.  :)

[SNIP]

0
Reply John 10/7/2003 2:26:29 AM

On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 01:15:32 +0100, Ray Norrish wrote:

> Why did anyone bother answering this prick in the 1st place?
> And fuck with the top posting - it makes much more sense to read new replies
> at to top.

No it doesn't, because I don't know what you're replying to until later.
Top-posting makes as much sense as having a conversation where you reply
before the other person says something.

--Eric

0
Reply Eric 10/7/2003 2:38:58 AM

Only if this was the first message you read from the entire thread.
If you follow a thread you'll most likely be interested in what has just
been added.


"Eric Haines" <eahaines@localnet.DOT.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2003.10.07.02.37.04.356252@localnet.DOT.com...
> On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 01:15:32 +0100, Ray Norrish wrote:
>
> > Why did anyone bother answering this prick in the 1st place?
> > And fuck with the top posting - it makes much more sense to read new
replies
> > at to top.
>
> No it doesn't, because I don't know what you're replying to until later.
> Top-posting makes as much sense as having a conversation where you reply
> before the other person says something.
>
> --Eric
>


0
Reply Ray 10/7/2003 6:09:59 PM

On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 19:09:59 +0100, Ray Norrish wrote:
>> > Why did anyone bother answering this prick in the 1st place?
>> > And fuck with the top posting - it makes much more sense to read new
>> > replies at to top.
>
>> No it doesn't, because I don't know what you're replying to until
>> later. Top-posting makes as much sense as having a conversation where
>> you reply before the other person says something.
>
> Only if this was the first message you read from the entire thread. If
> you follow a thread you'll most likely be interested in what has just
> been added.

Unless you're just reading a very very few threads, it's always good to
have a reminder of what the thread is about and what's been said.  Simple
common courtesy; if you're not interested in offering common courtesy just
say so.

--Eric

0
Reply Eric 10/8/2003 2:11:26 AM

"Ray Norrish" <ray@lardomatic.com> wrote in message
news:8kDgb.5015$kA.1382374@wards.force9.net
> Only if this was the first message you read from the entire thread.
> If you follow a thread you'll most likely be interested in what has
> just been added.

Just stop doing it already; nobody's going to agree with you.

--
http://www.delversdungeon.dragonsfoot.org
Remove the X's in my email address to respond.
"Damn you Silvey, and your endless fortunes." - Stephen Weir
I hate furries.


0
Reply Bill 10/10/2003 9:42:49 PM

I agree with him.. I prefer top-posting..  If yer familiar with the thread
(or esp when every previous post is right there in front of ya..)  scrolling
through 1, 2, 5, 18 K of quotes and useless header info to find some witless
2-3 line reply at the bottom is simply a waste of time and effort.

Witless 2-3 line replies at the top saves time.

Best of both worlds, IMHO... those who NEED the regirgitation can follow the
quotes below.. those who don't don't have their time wasted.

The Seinfeld Indian wedding episode, all done in reverse takes, was
hilarious.. AND made perfect sense.  :-)  Some of us just aren't that much
of a slave to linear time.. we can finger it out.  :-)

d.

> From: "Bill Silvey" <bxsxixlxvxexyx@cfl.rr.com>
> Organization: RoadRunner - Central Florida
> Newsgroups: 
> comp.sys.amiga.hardware,comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.amiga.games,comp.sys.amig
> a.advocacy,comp.sys.cbm
> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:42:49 GMT
> Subject: Re: The AMIGA is dead and the C64 still lives
> 
> "Ray Norrish" <ray@lardomatic.com> wrote in message
> news:8kDgb.5015$kA.1382374@wards.force9.net
>> Only if this was the first message you read from the entire thread.
>> If you follow a thread you'll most likely be interested in what has
>> just been added.
> 
> Just stop doing it already; nobody's going to agree with you.
> 
> --
> http://www.delversdungeon.dragonsfoot.org
> Remove the X's in my email address to respond.
> "Damn you Silvey, and your endless fortunes." - Stephen Weir
> I hate furries.
> 
> 

0
Reply Don 10/14/2003 12:39:52 AM

On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 00:39:52 +0000, Don Romero wrote:

> I agree with him.. I prefer top-posting..  If yer familiar with the thread
> (or esp when every previous post is right there in front of ya..)  scrolling
> through 1, 2, 5, 18 K of quotes and useless header info to find some witless
> 2-3 line reply at the bottom is simply a waste of time and effort.

The solution, obviously, is not to top-post *and* to snip sensibly.

It's not that hard, people!  Are you semi-literate dweebs or intelligent
beings?  Wait, don't answer that....

--Eric

0
Reply Eric 10/14/2003 2:22:33 AM

Eric Haines <eahaines@localnet.DOT.com> wrote:

> 222 341383 <pan.2003.10.14.02.22.27.893232@localnet.DOT.com> 
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 00:39:52 +0000, Don Romero wrote:

> > I agree with him.. I prefer top-posting..  If yer familiar with the thread
> > (or esp when every previous post is right there in front of ya..)  scrolling
> > through 1, 2, 5, 18 K of quotes and useless header info to find some witless
> > 2-3 line reply at the bottom is simply a waste of time and effort.

> The solution, obviously, is not to top-post *and* to snip sensibly.

> It's not that hard, people!  Are you semi-literate dweebs or intelligent
> beings?  Wait, don't answer that....

What about retitling threads gone sideways and trimming
the newsgroup list?

Thanks.

Terry


0
Reply tpalfrey (1197) 10/14/2003 3:20:47 AM

Not that hard.. not that "obvious", either.

Is it that we stand on tradition, or is tradition standing on us?

> From: Eric Haines <eahaines@localnet.DOT.com>

> On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 00:39:52 +0000, Don Romero wrote:
> 
>> I agree with him.. I prefer top-posting..  If yer familiar with the thread
>> (or esp when every previous post is right there in front of ya..)  scrolling
>> through 1, 2, 5, 18 K of quotes and useless header info to find some witless
>> 2-3 line reply at the bottom is simply a waste of time and effort.
> 
> The solution, obviously, is not to top-post *and* to snip sensibly.
> 
> It's not that hard, people!  Are you semi-literate dweebs or intelligent
> beings?  Wait, don't answer that....

Dweebs Untie!   :-)

d.


0
Reply Don 10/14/2003 11:33:56 PM

Don Romero <don.romero@verizon.net> wrote in
news:BBB1F2F8.165B2%don.romero@verizon.net: 

> Not that hard.. not that "obvious", either.
> 
> Is it that we stand on tradition, or is tradition standing on
> us? 
> 
>> From: Eric Haines <eahaines@localnet.DOT.com>
> 
>> On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 00:39:52 +0000, Don Romero wrote:
>> 
>>> I agree with him.. I prefer top-posting..  If yer familiar
>>> with the thread (or esp when every previous post is right
>>> there in front of ya..)  scrolling through 1, 2, 5, 18 K of
>>> quotes and useless header info to find some witless 2-3 line
>>> reply at the bottom is simply a waste of time and effort. 
>> 
>> The solution, obviously, is not to top-post *and* to snip
>> sensibly. 
>> 
>> It's not that hard, people!  Are you semi-literate dweebs or
>> intelligent beings?  Wait, don't answer that....
> 
> Dweebs Untie!   :-)


 The really messy bit starts right when someone top-posts,
 and some don't, and some do again, and some don't...

 In my view top-posting is good for a dialog, or when the
 thread is familiar with all the participants, but I think
 it more than anything demotivates the practise for trimming 
 the post down to the relevant bits. So it contributes more 
 to a waste of bandwidth and space..


 Regards...
0
Reply Bj 10/15/2003 12:28:59 AM

The C64 will be around a long time.
0
Reply sdanino (3) 10/16/2003 12:42:03 PM

masheg_solea@yahoo.com.hk (Carl Philtmoon) wrote in message news:<26e9ab06.0309231328.577c5df4@posting.google.com>...
> Inredible that a crappy machine as the C64 survived the more advanced,
> but also very crappy AMIGA.
> 
> Nobody wants AMIGAs anymore, nobody buys AMIGA games and hardware is
> cheap on ebay - C64 stuff is much more expensive !
> 
> I predict that in hundreds of years some idiots will still use C64 and
> Spectrum , but AMIGA already is DEAD !
> 
> RIP AMIGA !

Anagram of Troll Champion , an obvious troll.

Look at this :

Reltih Floda (Adolf Hitler backwards) raupico@yahoo.com

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=raupico@yahoo.com

Tom R. Rastell (anagram of Master Troll) eneg_doowtrop@yahoo.com

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&scoring=d&q=eneg_doowtrop@yahoo.com

Peter Mollror (anagram of Troll Emperor) pellus_torr@yahoo.com
(anagram of Super Troll)

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&scoring=d&q=pellus_torr@yahoo.com

Carl Philtmoon (anagram of Troll Champion) masheg_solea@yahoo.com.hk
(anagram of Mega Asshole)

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&scoring=d&q=masheg_solea

Tim Spujum (anagram of Shit Troll shifted 1 letter up)
sluggosnake@yahoo.co.nz

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&scoring=d&q=sluggosnake

Lord Teviolus (anagram of Devious Troll) darmzunge@yahoo.de

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&scoring=d&q=darmzunge

Adolf Hitler jr. , llortagem@yahoo.ca (Megatroll backwards)

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&scoring=d&q=llortagem

llortagig@freenet.de (Gigatroll backwards)

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&scoring=d&q=llortagig

Drol Yag (Gaylord backwards) , celophanpterer@yahoo.com

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=celophanpterer@yahoo.com

Sinep Mota (Atom Penis) , sinep_mota@web.de

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=sinep_mota@web.de

ALWAYS the same troll !


My advice : Don�t feed this silly kid and check names for anagrams.If
a suspicious new poster appears, check the name first.Two "ll" an "r"
, a "t" and an "o" make "troll" , he got better , so he may shift them
or encode it otherwise.Should be no problem for experienced
computer-fans.

Trollhunter
0
Reply mastertrollhunter 10/16/2003 8:52:40 PM

30 Replies
85 Views

(page loaded in 0.307 seconds)

2/26/2013 5:37:34 AM


Reply: