It appears after much troubleshooting that my RS232 converter is
dead. I tried it on 3 different C= systems and even soldered in all
brand-new electrolytic caps.
So.. I give up, does anyone have one they'd like to sell? Already
looked on ebay and saw nothing.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
adric22 (112)
|
1/31/2007 11:34:03 PM |
|
On Jan 31, 3:34 pm, David Murray wrote:
> ...does anyone have one they'd like to sell?
Well, if don't hear back from Tim V. in a few days, I can sell
the one that he was supposed to get.
Truly,
Robert Bernardo
Fresno Commodore User Group
http://videocam.net.au/fcug
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
rbernardo
|
2/1/2007 2:28:35 AM
|
|
On Jan 31, 6:34 pm, "David Murray" <adri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> It appears after much troubleshooting that my RS232 converter is
> dead. I tried it on 3 different C= systems and even soldered in all
> brand-new electrolytic caps.
>
> So.. I give up, does anyone have one they'd like to sell? Already
> looked on ebay and saw nothing.
Worse comes to worse, there's a couple simple plans on my site
you could build in an evening.
Oldbit
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Oldbitcollector
|
2/1/2007 5:47:02 AM
|
|
"Oldbitcollector" <jeffledger@gmail.com> writes:
> Worse comes to worse, there's a couple simple plans on my site
> you could build in an evening.
Is there a source for the user port edge connectors somewhere? Other
than that, a converter is very straightforward.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Anssi
|
2/1/2007 7:45:50 AM
|
|
> Is there a source for the user port edge connectors somewhere? Other
> than that, a converter is very straightforward.
Actually, I already have a spare edge connector or two. But I don't
have all the other parts and I'd have to order them. It is a project
I don't really feel I have time to make, if I could buy a complete
unit for under $20. If not, I may go that route eventually.
One of those swiftlink cartridges sounds good too, only I do not know
what terminal software will support it right now.. I haven't been able
to locate a list of supported software for it.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
MyPCHelp
|
2/1/2007 1:15:00 PM
|
|
MyPCHelp wrote:
>>Is there a source for the user port edge connectors somewhere? Other
>>than that, a converter is very straightforward.
>>
>>
>
>Actually, I already have a spare edge connector or two. But I don't
>have all the other parts and I'd have to order them. It is a project
>I don't really feel I have time to make, if I could buy a complete
>unit for under $20. If not, I may go that route eventually.
>
>One of those swiftlink cartridges sounds good too, only I do not know
>what terminal software will support it right now.. I haven't been able
>to locate a list of supported software for it.
>
>
>
Dare I say this, but you *might* be able to buy a new Turbo232 from
http://www.cmdrkey.com.
Maurice is very hit or miss (mostly miss) but I did have luck buying a
Turbo232 from him and he shipped it promptly. It's a Vegas gamble, but
if you strike out everywhere else and you don't feel like building one
from scratch, it might be worth a shot.
Thanks,
Dave
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Dave
|
2/1/2007 1:48:37 PM
|
|
On Feb 1, 2:45 am, Anssi Saari <a...@sci.fi> wrote:
> "Oldbitcollector" <jeffled...@gmail.com> writes:
> > Worse comes to worse, there's a couple simple plans on my site
> > you could build in an evening.
>
> Is there a source for the user port edge connectors somewhere? Other
> than that, a converter is very straightforward.
Digikey, part number EDC307240-ND for $2.45 each.
http://telbbs.petscii.com/interfaces.html
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Oldbitcollector
|
2/1/2007 2:49:23 PM
|
|
MyPCHelp wrote:
> One of those swiftlink cartridges sounds good too, only I do not know
> what terminal software will support it right now.. I haven't been able
> to locate a list of supported software for it.
Novaterm supports it. In fact, I *think* it supports just about everything
available when Nick Rossi was still working on it, including some of the
"oddball" interfaces.
Brian
--
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Brian
|
2/1/2007 4:50:22 PM
|
|
> Novaterm supports it. In fact, I *think* it supports just about everything
> available when Nick Rossi was still working on it, including some of the
> "oddball" interfaces.
I sort of theorized novaterm supported it.. but I hate novaterm. it
is too big and bloated for me. I'd rather use CCGMS for reliving my
childhood BBS experience. Later in my commodore teen years I used my
128 with Desterm (which I think may possibly support the swiftlink,
can't remember) and I would prefer to use Desterm 100 to 1 over
Novaterm.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
David
|
2/1/2007 5:36:17 PM
|
|
On Feb 1, 9:36 am, David Murray wrote:
> Later in my commodore teen years I used my
> 128 with Desterm (which I think may possibly support the swiftlink,
> can't remember) and I would prefer to use Desterm 100 to 1 over
> Novaterm.
Desterm 2.00, 2.01, and 3.02 all work with the Turbo-232 cart.
Truly,
Robert Bernardo
Fresno Commodore User Group
http://videocam.net.au/fcug
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
rbernardo
|
2/2/2007 5:19:24 AM
|
|
Oldbitcollector wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2:45 am, Anssi Saari <a...@sci.fi> wrote:
>> "Oldbitcollector" <jeffled...@gmail.com> writes:
>> > Worse comes to worse, there's a couple simple plans on my site
>> > you could build in an evening.
>>
>> Is there a source for the user port edge connectors somewhere? Other
>> than that, a converter is very straightforward.
>
> Digikey, part number EDC307240-ND for $2.45 each.
> http://telbbs.petscii.com/interfaces.html
*Pounds my head on desk repeatedly* Really? That would have made things so
much easier. Oh well. Live and learn.
--
-----> http://members.dodo.com.au/~izabellion1/tristan/index.html <-----
===== It's not pretty, it's not great, but it is mine. =====
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Tristan
|
2/3/2007 1:39:12 AM
|
|
|
10 Replies
71 Views
(page loaded in 0.176 seconds)
|