....Apple wins.

<http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/03/25/itc_rules_apple_did_not_in
fringe_five_nokia_patents.html>

What were the trolls saying, again?

-- 
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- 
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone 
"It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix." -- "It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix' (Edwin on Mac OS X) 
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' -- 
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the 
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM) 
'Solaris is just a marketing rename of Sun OS.' -- 'Sun OS is not included 
on the timeline of Solaris because it's a different OS.' (Edwin on Sun) 

On 3/27/11 3:50 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
> ...Apple wins.
>
> <http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/03/25/itc_rules_apple_did_not_in
> fringe_five_nokia_patents.html>
>
> What were the trolls saying, again?
>

It seemed that this was just an initial ruling and that the final 
decision will not happen until August 2011.  Did I misread this?

Steve

On 27/03/2011 23:50, Alan Baker wrote:

> ...Apple wins.

> <http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/03/25/itc_rules_apple_did_not_in
> fringe_five_nokia_patents.html>

It's all academic.  Now that Nokia have 'teamed up' with M$ (in order 
words, been infiltrated and paid $1billion as a bribe), their days are 
numbered.

"Alan Baker"  wrote in message 
news:alangbaker-004543.15495927032011@news.shawcable.net...

....Apple wins.

<http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/03/25/itc_rules_apple_did_not_in
fringe_five_nokia_patents.html>

>What were the trolls saying, again?

Broken link - again!!! Oh well.

Strange how an IT "expert" can't seem to fix his own browser.

-- 
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- 
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone
"It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix." -- "It's BSD Unix 
with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix' (Edwin on 
Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' -- 
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
'Solaris is just a marketing rename of Sun OS.' -- 'Sun OS is not included
on the timeline of Solaris because it's a different OS.' (Edwin on Sun) 

In article <imqd0m$por$1@dont-email.me>,
 "Redjak" <redjackson@yahoo.com> wrote:

> "Alan Baker"  wrote in message 
> news:alangbaker-004543.15495927032011@news.shawcable.net...
> 
> ...Apple wins.
> 
> <http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/03/25/itc_rules_apple_did_not_in
> fringe_five_nokia_patents.html>
> 
> >What were the trolls saying, again?
> 
> Broken link - again!!! Oh well.

It's not broken for me.

> 
> Strange how an IT "expert" can't seem to fix his own browser.

Strange how you always find the links that are going to tell you things 
you'd rather not known "broken".

-- 
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- 
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone 
"It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix." -- "It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix' (Edwin on Mac OS X) 
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' -- 
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the 
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM) 
'Solaris is just a marketing rename of Sun OS.' -- 'Sun OS is not included 
on the timeline of Solaris because it's a different OS.' (Edwin on Sun) 

On Mar 28, 12:42=A0pm, Alan Baker <alangba...@telus.net> wrote:
> In article <imqd0m$po...@dont-email.me>,
>
> =A0"Redjak" <redjack...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > "Alan Baker" =A0wrote in message
> >news:alangbaker-004543.15495927032011@news.shawcable.net...
>
> > ...Apple wins.
>
> > <http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/03/25/itc_rules_apple_did_not_=
in
> > fringe_five_nokia_patents.html>
>
> > >What were the trolls saying, again?
>
> > Broken link - again!!! Oh well.
>
> It's not broken for me.
>

It's broken on the iPhone.

In article <TtCdnQVusN0muQ3QnZ2dnUVZ_q6dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
 Steve de Mena <steve@stevedemena.com> wrote:

> On 3/27/11 3:50 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
> > ...Apple wins.
> >
> > <http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/03/25/itc_rules_apple_did_not_in
> > fringe_five_nokia_patents.html>
> >
> > What were the trolls saying, again?
> >
> 
> It seemed that this was just an initial ruling and that the final 
> decision will not happen until August 2011.  Did I misread this?
> 
> Steve

So you can click through to the earlier sources rather than attempt to 
muddy the waters by carping about the author...

....or did I misread you?

-- 
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" -- 
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone 
"It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix." -- "It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix' (Edwin on Mac OS X) 
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' -- 
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the 
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM) 
'Solaris is just a marketing rename of Sun OS.' -- 'Sun OS is not included 
on the timeline of Solaris because it's a different OS.' (Edwin on Sun) 

"Alan Baker" <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote in message 
news:alangbaker-004543.15495927032011@news.shawcable.net...
> ...Apple wins.
>
> <http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/03/25/itc_rules_apple_did_not_in
> fringe_five_nokia_patents.html>
>
> What were the trolls saying, again?

They were telling you Apple has always suffered from the problem Nokia has 
now:

"Nokia shipped 28.3 million smartphones in the last quarter, an impressive 
bump from 20.8 million units shipped a year ago and 26.5 million from the 
previous quarter. But its market share dropped a massive 7 points since the 
previous quarter to 31 percent - a sign that the release of Microsoft's 
Windows Phone 7 platform, as well as increasing success from the iPhone and 
Android, were significant blows to Nokia's smartphone presence."

http://venturebeat.com/2011/01/27/nokia-loses-market-share/

The same thing applies when Apple sells more Macs or iPhones, yet still 
loses market share.

Of course you fanbois think market share only matters when one of Apple's 
competitors is losing it.   When Apple loses market share, that metric 
ceases to matter.

LOLLERCOASTER 

"Steve de Mena" <steve@stevedemena.com> wrote in message 
news:a9CdnYklG8LDAQzQnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@giganews.com...
> On 3/28/11 11:58 AM, Alan Baker wrote:
>> In article<TtCdnQVusN0muQ3QnZ2dnUVZ_q6dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
>>   Steve de Mena<steve@stevedemena.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/27/11 3:50 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
>>>> ...Apple wins.
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/03/25/itc_rules_apple_did_not_in
>>>> fringe_five_nokia_patents.html>
>>>>
>>>> What were the trolls saying, again?
>>>>
>>>
>>> It seemed that this was just an initial ruling and that the final
>>> decision will not happen until August 2011.  Did I misread this?
>>>
>>> Steve
>>
>> So you can click through to the earlier sources rather than attempt to
>> muddy the waters by carping about the author...
>>
>> ...or did I misread you?
>>
>
> I did read the link in that other thread.  I commented extensively on it. 
> I had to cut and paste the 2nd part of the URL though.
>
> Steve

Didn't the fanbois tell us you don't have to do that with links on the Mac?

LOLLERCOASTER