If I sort a mailbox on the from field, I can find mail from a specific
sender, but if I enter that name in the search field for that mailbox it
isn't found. How can I force search to search that field?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
bob148 (545)
|
2/13/2012 3:45:37 PM |
|
In article <bob-FD86C5.10453713022012@5ad64b5e.bb.sky.com>,
Robert Peirce <bob@peirce-family.com> wrote:
> If I sort a mailbox on the from field, I can find mail from a specific
> sender, but if I enter that name in the search field for that mailbox it
> isn't found. How can I force search to search that field?
Is this a Lion issue? I'm using Snow Leopard, and when I enter
something in the Search box, I get a set of buttons letting me choose
where to search: Entire Message, From, To, Subject. And Entire Message
appears to search the from field.
--
Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
barmar (5629)
|
2/13/2012 4:08:45 PM
|
|
In article <barmar-519878.11084513022012@news.eternal-september.org>,
Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> In article <bob-FD86C5.10453713022012@5ad64b5e.bb.sky.com>,
> Robert Peirce <bob@peirce-family.com> wrote:
>
> > If I sort a mailbox on the from field, I can find mail from a specific
> > sender, but if I enter that name in the search field for that mailbox it
> > isn't found. How can I force search to search that field?
>
> Is this a Lion issue? I'm using Snow Leopard, and when I enter
> something in the Search box, I get a set of buttons letting me choose
> where to search: Entire Message, From, To, Subject. And Entire Message
> appears to search the from field.
Sorry. Yes it is a Lion issue. I don't recall having this problem with
Snow Leopard. You might say that sorting the From column is enough, and
it is if you are just looking through a relatively small mailbox.
However, if you are looking through all your mail folders it is a problem
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
bob148 (545)
|
2/13/2012 5:41:07 PM
|
|
In article <bob-175344.12410713022012@5ad64b5e.bb.sky.com>,
Robert Peirce <bob@peirce-family.com> wrote:
> In article <barmar-519878.11084513022012@news.eternal-september.org>,
> Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> > In article <bob-FD86C5.10453713022012@5ad64b5e.bb.sky.com>,
> > Robert Peirce <bob@peirce-family.com> wrote:
> >
> > > If I sort a mailbox on the from field, I can find mail from a specific
> > > sender, but if I enter that name in the search field for that mailbox it
> > > isn't found. How can I force search to search that field?
> >
> > Is this a Lion issue? I'm using Snow Leopard, and when I enter
> > something in the Search box, I get a set of buttons letting me choose
> > where to search: Entire Message, From, To, Subject. And Entire Message
> > appears to search the from field.
>
> Sorry. Yes it is a Lion issue. I don't recall having this problem with
> Snow Leopard. You might say that sorting the From column is enough, and
> it is if you are just looking through a relatively small mailbox.
> However, if you are looking through all your mail folders it is a problem
I don't see that behavior (Mail.app Version 5.2 (1257)) Mac OS X 10.7.3.
When I enter an item in the search field, I get a pop-up showing a
separated list of:
People containing the search item,
Subjects containing the search item,
Mailboxes containing the search item.
--
PRAY, v. To ask that the laws of the universe be annulled in behalf
of a single petitioner confessedly unworthy. -- Ambrose Bierce
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
tom_stiller (1170)
|
2/13/2012 6:35:17 PM
|
|
In article <tom_stiller-EA0A1E.13351713022012@news.individual.net>,
Tom Stiller <tom_stiller@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I don't see that behavior (Mail.app Version 5.2 (1257)) Mac OS X 10.7.3.
> When I enter an item in the search field, I get a pop-up showing a
> separated list of:
> People containing the search item,
> Subjects containing the search item,
> Mailboxes containing the search item.
I get that as well, but the People list does not include all the people
it should. I will give you an example.
Under a mailbox I call "Mailing Lists and Licenses" I have an entry for
"Datacolor Software Activation." At least that is the way it shows up
in the From list. Searching on "data" in "All" mailboxes only brings up
persons called "Datacolor DCS Support" and "Datacolor Newsletter." I am
trying to find out how to force it to show "Datacolor Software
Activation" as a choice.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
bob148 (545)
|
2/13/2012 7:44:27 PM
|
|
In article <bob-24C5EA.14442713022012@5ad64b5e.bb.sky.com>,
Robert Peirce <bob@peirce-family.com> wrote:
> In article <tom_stiller-EA0A1E.13351713022012@news.individual.net>,
> Tom Stiller <tom_stiller@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > I don't see that behavior (Mail.app Version 5.2 (1257)) Mac OS X 10.7.3.
> > When I enter an item in the search field, I get a pop-up showing a
> > separated list of:
> > People containing the search item,
> > Subjects containing the search item,
> > Mailboxes containing the search item.
>
> I get that as well, but the People list does not include all the people
> it should. I will give you an example.
>
> Under a mailbox I call "Mailing Lists and Licenses" I have an entry for
> "Datacolor Software Activation." At least that is the way it shows up
> in the From list. Searching on "data" in "All" mailboxes only brings up
> persons called "Datacolor DCS Support" and "Datacolor Newsletter." I am
> trying to find out how to force it to show "Datacolor Software
> Activation" as a choice.
I haven't seen that. Have you tried rebuilding the mailbox(es)?
Menubar->Mailbox-> Rebuild
--
PRAY, v. To ask that the laws of the universe be annulled in behalf
of a single petitioner confessedly unworthy. -- Ambrose Bierce
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
tom_stiller (1170)
|
2/13/2012 8:55:48 PM
|
|
In article <tom_stiller-66F859.15554813022012@news.individual.net>,
Tom Stiller <tom_stiller@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In article <bob-24C5EA.14442713022012@5ad64b5e.bb.sky.com>,
> Robert Peirce <bob@peirce-family.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <tom_stiller-EA0A1E.13351713022012@news.individual.net>,
> > Tom Stiller <tom_stiller@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I don't see that behavior (Mail.app Version 5.2 (1257)) Mac OS X 10.7.3.
> > > When I enter an item in the search field, I get a pop-up showing a
> > > separated list of:
> > > People containing the search item,
> > > Subjects containing the search item,
> > > Mailboxes containing the search item.
> >
> > I get that as well, but the People list does not include all the people
> > it should. I will give you an example.
> >
> > Under a mailbox I call "Mailing Lists and Licenses" I have an entry for
> > "Datacolor Software Activation." At least that is the way it shows up
> > in the From list. Searching on "data" in "All" mailboxes only brings up
> > persons called "Datacolor DCS Support" and "Datacolor Newsletter." I am
> > trying to find out how to force it to show "Datacolor Software
> > Activation" as a choice.
I just did a search in mail same version and OS that you have and a pop
up menu appeared below the search box with a list titled People, and a
list titled Subject, the People list would seem to be what you are
looking for.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
once2 (92)
|
2/13/2012 9:32:52 PM
|
|
In article <tom_stiller-66F859.15554813022012@news.individual.net>,
Tom Stiller <tom_stiller@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Under a mailbox I call "Mailing Lists and Licenses" I have an entry for
> > "Datacolor Software Activation." At least that is the way it shows up
> > in the From list. Searching on "data" in "All" mailboxes only brings up
> > persons called "Datacolor DCS Support" and "Datacolor Newsletter." I am
> > trying to find out how to force it to show "Datacolor Software
> > Activation" as a choice.
>
> I haven't seen that. Have you tried rebuilding the mailbox(es)?
> Menubar->Mailbox-> Rebuild
No. I just did it. No joy. It must be something else.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
bob148 (545)
|
2/13/2012 10:53:24 PM
|
|
In article <once-B6C91F.13325213022012@news.eternal-september.org>,
Gerry <once@around-the-block.org> wrote:
> > > Under a mailbox I call "Mailing Lists and Licenses" I have an entry for
> > > "Datacolor Software Activation." At least that is the way it shows up
> > > in the From list. Searching on "data" in "All" mailboxes only brings up
> > > persons called "Datacolor DCS Support" and "Datacolor Newsletter." I am
> > > trying to find out how to force it to show "Datacolor Software
> > > Activation" as a choice.
>
> I just did a search in mail same version and OS that you have and a pop
> up menu appeared below the search box with a list titled People, and a
> list titled Subject, the People list would seem to be what you are
> looking for.
I get the people list but it doesn't include "Datacolor Software
Activation."
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
bob148 (545)
|
2/13/2012 10:54:20 PM
|
|
In article <bob-FD86C5.10453713022012@5ad64b5e.bb.sky.com>,
Robert Peirce <bob@peirce-family.com> wrote:
> If I sort a mailbox on the from field, I can find mail from a specific
> sender, but if I enter that name in the search field for that mailbox it
> isn't found. How can I force search to search that field?
I'm using Lion and typing a full or partial name in Mail's search field
works fine here. It starts sorting the list immediately as I type, and
even lets me choose from matching people. subjects, and mailboxes in the
Search menu:
<http://jollyroger.kicks-ass.org/mail/search.png>
Obviously, if you are searching for a person, what you have in your
address book for that person will need to match the text you are typing
to find them.
If you want help with this, I think you'll need to give us more
information about the particular things you are typing and what shows up
in the Search menu while you type them.
--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.
JR
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
jollyroger (10542)
|
2/14/2012 9:03:23 PM
|
|
On 02-14-2012 16:03, Jolly Roger wrote:
> Obviously, if you are searching for a person, what you have in your
> address book for that person will need to match the text you are typing
> to find them.
Sounds a little bit like the issue I had sometime ago.
Mail would auto-complete an address that was NOT in my address book,
but would not find it in search.
--
Wes Groleau
From the cowardice that shrinks from new truth,
From the laziness that is content with half-truths,
From the arrogance that thinks it knows all truth,
O God of Truth, deliver us.
--Leslie Dixon Weatherhead
--Rabbi Mordechai M. Kaplan
--ancient prayer
--unknown
--(no attempt at attribution)
(a thousand thanks to someone who can tell me who
really wrote it AND persuade me they're not making it up!)
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
news31 (6411)
|
2/15/2012 2:16:04 AM
|
|
In article <jhf4h4$ujs$2@dont-email.me>,
Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> wrote:
> On 02-14-2012 16:03, Jolly Roger wrote:
> > Obviously, if you are searching for a person, what you have in your
> > address book for that person will need to match the text you are typing
> > to find them.
>
> Sounds a little bit like the issue I had sometime ago.
> Mail would auto-complete an address that was NOT in my address book,
> but would not find it in search.
If you search by the person's name, then it should find them either way,
assuming you have their name correctly entered into Address Book.
--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.
JR
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
jollyroger (10542)
|
2/15/2012 1:40:37 PM
|
|
On 2012-02-13 15:45:37 +0000, Robert Peirce said:
> If I sort a mailbox on the from field, I can find mail from a specific
> sender, but if I enter that name in the search field for that mailbox it
> isn't found. How can I force search to search that field?
I don't understand. If I sort on the "from" field with the parent
"Inbox" selected, then type in a piece of the name in the search field
it provides a subset of the "from" users just fine.
--
I do not feel obligated to believe that the same God who has endowed us
with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forego their use.
-- Galileo
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
xxx613 (1045)
|
2/15/2012 11:33:43 PM
|
|
On 02-15-2012 08:40, Jolly Roger wrote:
> Wes Groleau<Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> wrote:
>> Sounds a little bit like the issue I had sometime ago.
>> Mail would auto-complete an address that was NOT in my address book,
>> but would not find it in search.
>
> If you search by the person's name, then it should find them either way,
> assuming you have their name correctly entered into Address Book.
I said "was NOT in my address book"
--
Wes Groleau
“Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity.
But I'm not so sure about the universe.”
— Albert Einstein
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
news31 (6411)
|
2/16/2012 2:09:21 AM
|
|
Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> wrote:
> Robert Peirce <bob@peirce-family.com> wrote:
> > In article <barmar-519878.11084513022012@news.eternal-september.org>,
> > Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> >
> >> In article <bob-FD86C5.10453713022012@5ad64b5e.bb.sky.com>,
> >> Robert Peirce <bob@peirce-family.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> If I sort a mailbox on the from field, I can find mail from a specific
> >>> sender, but if I enter that name in the search field for that mailbox it
> >>> isn't found. How can I force search to search that field?
> >>
> >> Is this a Lion issue? I'm using Snow Leopard, and when I enter
> >> something in the Search box, I get a set of buttons letting me choose
> >> where to search: Entire Message, From, To, Subject. And Entire Message
> >> appears to search the from field.
> >
> > Sorry. Yes it is a Lion issue. I don't recall having this problem with
> > Snow Leopard. You might say that sorting the From column is enough, and
> > it is if you are just looking through a relatively small mailbox.
> > However, if you are looking through all your mail folders it is a problem
>
> And yet people keep telling me my suspicions of upgrades are unfounded . .
> .
I'm sticking with Snow Leopard and my advice has always been to stay a
version behind if you can. Let others deal with new badly thought out
design and bugs.
--
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
jamiekg505 (2517)
|
2/16/2012 9:05:07 AM
|
|
In article <1kfkvvr.ph6m3unvltvkN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz>,
jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) wrote:
> Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> wrote:
>
> > Robert Peirce <bob@peirce-family.com> wrote:
> > > In article <barmar-519878.11084513022012@news.eternal-september.org>,
> > > Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > >> In article <bob-FD86C5.10453713022012@5ad64b5e.bb.sky.com>,
> > >> Robert Peirce <bob@peirce-family.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> If I sort a mailbox on the from field, I can find mail from a specific
> > >>> sender, but if I enter that name in the search field for that mailbox it
> > >>> isn't found. How can I force search to search that field?
> > >>
> > >> Is this a Lion issue? I'm using Snow Leopard, and when I enter
> > >> something in the Search box, I get a set of buttons letting me choose
> > >> where to search: Entire Message, From, To, Subject. And Entire Message
> > >> appears to search the from field.
> > >
> > > Sorry. Yes it is a Lion issue. I don't recall having this problem with
> > > Snow Leopard. You might say that sorting the From column is enough, and
> > > it is if you are just looking through a relatively small mailbox.
> > > However, if you are looking through all your mail folders it is a problem
> >
> > And yet people keep telling me my suspicions of upgrades are unfounded . .
> > .
>
> I'm sticking with Snow Leopard and my advice has always been to stay a
> version behind if you can. Let others deal with new badly thought out
> design and bugs.
That's certainly a good strategy for some people and in some situations.
--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.
JR
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
jollyroger (10542)
|
2/16/2012 12:28:19 PM
|
|
In article <jhhogh$dp4$1@dont-email.me>,
Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> wrote:
> On 02-15-2012 08:40, Jolly Roger wrote:
> > Wes Groleau<Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> wrote:
> >> Sounds a little bit like the issue I had sometime ago.
> >> Mail would auto-complete an address that was NOT in my address book,
> >> but would not find it in search.
> >
> > If you search by the person's name, then it should find them either way,
> > assuming you have their name correctly entered into Address Book.
>
> I said "was NOT in my address book"
Oh sorry I hadn't read that all the way through. The issue you mention
is not the same issue as the OP.
--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.
JR
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
jollyroger (10542)
|
2/16/2012 12:29:31 PM
|
|
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
> In article <1kfkvvr.ph6m3unvltvkN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz>,
> jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) wrote:
>
> > Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> wrote:
[snip]
> > > And yet people keep telling me my suspicions of upgrades are unfounded
> > > . . .
> >
> > I'm sticking with Snow Leopard and my advice has always been to stay a
> > version behind if you can. Let others deal with new badly thought out
> > design and bugs.
>
> That's certainly a good strategy for some people and in some situations.
And totally workable for users as Apple and third party support
continues for at least the previous version of OSX, with few exceptions.
Those exceptions would be brand new software built for the latest OS
only, and that's breaking my one version behind rule anyway :-)
It's important to remember the latest and greatest aint always so great
right off the bat. Also staying one version behind can lead to cost
savings if you're thrifty, as the previous version is often heavily
discounted new or secondhand. Not to mention avoiding the downtime and
losses from having to deal with buggy new software.
--
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
jamiekg505 (2517)
|
2/16/2012 6:34:39 PM
|
|
On 02-16-2012 04:05, Jamie Kahn Genet wrote:
> I'm sticking with Snow Leopard and my advice has always been to stay a
> version behind if you can. Let others deal with new badly thought out
> design and bugs.
And they're already promising "Mountain Lion"
with "all-new features inspired by iPad."
--
Wes Groleau
“It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it
goes. A principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars of the
world.”
— Thomas Jefferson
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
news31 (6411)
|
2/17/2012 5:14:57 AM
|
|
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:14:57 -0500, Wes Groleau wrote:
> On 02-16-2012 04:05, Jamie Kahn Genet wrote:
>> I'm sticking with Snow Leopard and my advice has always been to stay a
>> version behind if you can. Let others deal with new badly thought out
>> design and bugs.
>
> And they're already promising "Mountain Lion" with "all-new features
> inspired by iPad."
There's some of it here:
<http://mashable.com/2012/02/16/apple-mountain-lion-mac-osx/>
But note that there are still a lot of folks staying with Snow Leopard,
for the moment at least:
"OS 10.7, or Lion, launched in July 2011; 30% of Mac users now have it
installed. (Another 50% of us still favor Snow Leopard)."
--
Paul Sture
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
paul303 (1382)
|
2/17/2012 9:18:26 AM
|
|
Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> wrote:
> Jamie Kahn Genet <jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> wrote:
> > Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> wrote:
> >
> >> Robert Peirce <bob@peirce-family.com> wrote:
> >>> In article <barmar-519878.11084513022012@news.eternal-september.org>,
> >>> Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> In article <bob-FD86C5.10453713022012@5ad64b5e.bb.sky.com>,
> >>>> Robert Peirce <bob@peirce-family.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> If I sort a mailbox on the from field, I can find mail from a specific
> >>>>> sender, but if I enter that name in the search field for that mailbox it
> >>>>> isn't found. How can I force search to search that field?
> >>>>
> >>>> Is this a Lion issue? I'm using Snow Leopard, and when I enter
> >>>> something in the Search box, I get a set of buttons letting me choose
> >>>> where to search: Entire Message, From, To, Subject. And Entire Message
> >>>> appears to search the from field.
> >>>
> >>> Sorry. Yes it is a Lion issue. I don't recall having this problem with
> >>> Snow Leopard. You might say that sorting the From column is enough, and
> >>> it is if you are just looking through a relatively small mailbox.
> >>> However, if you are looking through all your mail folders it is a problem
> >>
> >> And yet people keep telling me my suspicions of upgrades are unfounded . .
> >> .
> >
> > I'm sticking with Snow Leopard and my advice has always been to stay a
> > version behind if you can. Let others deal with new badly thought out
> > design and bugs.
>
> That's about where I hang out. I do upgrade eventually, but long after
> everyone else 8-)
Nowadays about the only thing I do rush to update are multiplayer games
and software that's already buggy (or buggy ebough for me to care and a
fix is promised in the update), excepting some software I beta test.
Everything else can wait till I need a feature, something breaks due to
other updates, or there's a sale on a new version and it's nothing
critical.
--
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
jamiekg505 (2517)
|
2/22/2012 10:16:23 AM
|
|
|
20 Replies
43 Views
(page loaded in 0.346 seconds)
Similiar Articles: Easiest way to search a list of String in a field? - comp.soft-sys ...... UGA.EDU Subject: Re: Easiest way to search a list of String in a field? ... in Front' DATA - PRINT - MAIL ... dashes and then parsing the field ... There must be an easy way ... Sorting address field - comp.databases.filemakerNow, if I sort by "address" field, it sorts by number, disregarding street name. Is there a way so separate house number from street name in the same field or some other ... disabling field validation - comp.databases.filemakerIs there any way to turn off field validation /only/ when in Find mode? (i.e. so the user can search for anything in the field, but is restricted in w... run script on entering a field - comp.databases.filemaker ...Is there any way to execute a script automatically when you enter or exit a field in Browse mode? ... Automatically Mail PDF Script - comp.databases ... Join two lines in pattern matching, search, then assign fields to ...... database is dumped with 2 lines for each row and it doesn't always insert a newline after the same field. Is there a way in awk that I could join the two lines, search ... Concatenate text from related records? - comp.databases.filemaker ...Question: is there a way to define a calculation field in the parent table that will concatenate text from several related child records? Bill -- To send e-mail ... sending current record by email - comp.databases.filemaker ...There might be an easier way in FileMaker 7 or 8, but there ... Add a new field that is used to ... only for ... m doing same > search right now ... mailserver - comp.mail ... Is there a way to locate old emails I sent years ago? - comp.mail ...... used to email about 5 years back, is there any way to find ... send e-mail to homail account - comp.mail.misc Is there a way to ... put] in supply, or [sent] to the field, but ... Export field list to a file - comp.databases.filemakerIs there a way of exporting a list of my fields to a file? I know I can print a list ... That will give you a comma separated file with all your field names in the top ... extract phone numbers from text field - comp.databases.filemaker ...Is there some way to extract phone numbers from where ever they appear in a text field? Pattern count seems to return a number so I'm not sure if it... re; Is there a way to center text in a combo box? - comp.lang.java ...Hi; Is there any way to center text in the text field of a combo box, so is it always going to be left justified? I've checked the APIs but could find... How to paste container field link information to another text ...Is there a way to 'extract' the directory path and filename of a document inserted into a container field as a link ? The document links are inserted ... Way to "break" the connection? So that moving an email out of sent ...Is there a way to completely sever the connectivity so that when ... create a simple button for the Sent view to add that field. Of course, then you'd have a custom mail ... Export to Excel without losing field names - comp.databases ...My pet peeve about FileMaker (or perhaps with Excel) is that there is no way to export data without losing the field names when re-importing in to Exc... Count repeat of value across all records - comp.databases ...Is there a way of using a calculation field to tell me how many times a value has been used/entered in the same field across all the records? I have ... How to Find Someone's Email Address for Free | eHow.com... directory for e-mail addresses, there are several ways to find ... at the top of the e-mail heading. There you will find an e-mail address. For example, the "From" field ... Yahoo! MailYour World. Your Way. Yahoo! makes it easy to enjoy what matters most in your world. Best in class Yahoo! Mail, breaking local, national and global news, finance ... 7/18/2012 8:12:39 PM
|