In Leviticus 18:22 we read "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with
womankind it is abomination." Also in Leviticus 20:13 "If a man also
lie
with mankind as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an
abomination, they shall surely be put to death, their blood shall be
upon
them." In Deuteronomy 23:17 we read "There shall be no whore of the
daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons of Israel.".

Its extremely clear what our Father in heaven has to say about
homosexuals.
Other Old Testament verses on the subject can be found in 1 Kings
14:24 and
15:12, II Kings 23:7, Isaiah 3:9 and Jeremiah 23:14. There are more
verses
in the Bible on this subject, but I think I have made my point. Some
say
the New Testament does not address homosexuality at all. So, let us
read 1
Corinthians 6:9 "No ye not that the unrightous shall not inherit the
kingdom of God? Be not deceived, neither fornicators, nor idolators,
nor
adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind."
Also
in Jude 7, Romans 1:22-32 and 1 Timothy 1:10. By the way, for those
that
don't know the meaning of the word effeminate it means a man that
takes on
the characteristics of a woman.

So, as you can see, if any Judeo-Christian minister does not preach
against
homosexuality, he is a liar and a deceiver. Homosexuality, like a
cancer,
must be cut out of our society or it will grow until it kills the
body,
like a cancer.

"denis" <mrwilson695563465346@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:733dcc53-77a6-4745-b211-4c65b6cb7882@ur9g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...

What is this doing in a baseball group? Nobody here gives a damn for your 
opinions, even that Rosecomm idiot plonked you. Too bad...he might have said 
"Pete Rose belongs in the Hall of Fame playing with homosexual-sex-obsessed 
dee-nis's pecker." Now THAT would be an appropriate job for him. 

denis <mrwilson695563465346@gmail.com> wrote:

>all of the garbage snipped
What the hell is this doing in a Mac computer user group.
Why don't you go sit in a corner and play with yourself.
Plonk
Peter
-- 

I’ve heard recently that Sydney radio shock jock, Karl Sandilands is 
suffering from shrinking testicles. You ain't seen nothing until you've 
had some fat queen sado-masochistic faggot actor as a gym junkie from 
Sydney going troppo at being called a plump frump.

Does your dictionary make haughty a lawful alternative to skanking 
whore, or self conceit a synonym for your shit?

Brad (bradvk2qq@gmail.com): “W[hat] T[he] F[uck] are you talking about?”

atec77 (atec77@hotmail.com): “No one know[s] or cares. It is after all 
just dork talk!”

dolf: “Karl you’re a chook.”

Ish (m@g.net): “I thought so. What’s the matter? Afraid of women?”

Denis / Ish (denis.mattg@yahoo.de / ish.mattg@yahoo.de): “Is exactly 
what I am”

Ish (xm@c.net): “You can’t consider a faggot like you a ‘woman’.

Is it really beyond you to believe a woman can like baseball and not 
necessarily want to read about your obsessions in a baseball group? 
Chauvinist!”.

denis (mrwilson6982@yahoo.de): “You can't consider a faggot tranny like 
you a ‘woman’.”

dolf: “There’s only one queen and that’s Madonna bitch.”

Ishtar (ishtarnec@gmail.com): “Fucking frog. Awful funny you show up 
when the trolls do.”

dolf: “Qu'est-ce? Aren’t you just the trolley dolly from the women's 
hospital.” [B-Day Song (feature M.I.A) Madonna MDNA ℗ 2012 Boy Toy Inc.]

What is a Nation? (Qu'est-ce qu'une nation?) is a 1882 essay by French 
historian Ernst Renan (1823–1892), known for the statements that a 
nation is "a daily referendum", and that nations are based as much on 
what the people jointly forget, as what they remember. It is frequently 
quoted or anthologized in works of history or political science 
pertaining to nationalism. [Wikipedia 2012: Qu’est-ce?]

M (storm@c.net): “What is this doing in a baseball group? Nobody here 
gives a damn for your opinions, even that Rosecomm idiot plonked you. 
Too bad...he might have said ‘Pete Rose belongs in the Hall of Fame 
playing with homosexual-sex-obsessed dee-nis's pecker.’ Now THAT would 
be an appropriate job for him.”

Barry OGrady (atheist@hotmail.com.au): “You don't understand yourself at 
all. You think it clever not to punctuate. What are trying to prove?

You probably think its cool to wear a baseball cap on backwards. You 
conform to what you think is non conforming.”

Old Jinglebollocks (old.jinglebollocks@gmail.com): “Doesn't matter any more.

Can't be bothered even to read what you bums are writing on usenet.

Fuck ye, the whole damned lot o' ye.”

I thought Jamie Rowe was discriminatory in the manner by which he 
undertook his seeking of housemates in Liverpool Street with Gay 
Share-space was indulgently disrespectful of the person's dignity as 
autonomic right. That collectively these radio personalities are by 
their fascist dog commentary, not mindful of duty to State.

On 28/03/12 6:22 AM, denis wrote:
> In Leviticus 18:22 we read "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with
> womankind it is abomination." Also in Leviticus 20:13 "If a man also
> lie with mankind as he lieth with a woman, both of them have
> committed an abomination, they shall surely be put to death, their
> blood shall be upon them." In Deuteronomy 23:17 we read "There shall
>  be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons
> of Israel.".
>
> Its extremely clear what our Father in heaven has to say about
> homosexuals. Other Old Testament verses on the subject can be found
> in 1 Kings 14:24 and 15:12, II Kings 23:7, Isaiah 3:9 and Jeremiah
> 23:14. There are more verses in the Bible on this subject, but I
> think I have made my point. Some say the New Testament does not
> address homosexuality at all. So, let us read 1 Corinthians 6:9 "No
> ye not that the unrightous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be
> not deceived, neither fornicators, nor idolators, nor adulterers, nor
> effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind." Also in Jude 7,
> Romans 1:22-32 and 1 Timothy 1:10. By the way, for those that don't
> know the meaning of the word effeminate it means a man that takes on
> the characteristics of a woman.
>
> So, as you can see, if any Judeo-Christian minister does not preach
> against homosexuality, he is a liar and a deceiver. Homosexuality,
> like a cancer, must be cut out of our society or it will grow until
> it kills the body, like a cancer.

On 28/03/12 4:27 PM, M wrote:
> "denis"<mrwilson695563465346@gmail.com>  wrote in message
> news:733dcc53-77a6-4745-b211-4c65b6cb7882@ur9g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
>
>What is this doing in a baseball group? Nobody here gives a damn for
> your opinions, even that Rosecomm idiot plonked you. Too bad...he
> might have said "Pete Rose belongs in the Hall of Fame playing with
> homosexual sex-obsessed dee-nis's pecker." Now THAT would be an
> appropriate job for him.
>
>

The foremost atheist Philosopher of our age recently launched his new 
book ‘Religion for Atheists’ and no atheists are interested in talking 
about it, including all the ones who eagerly embraced Dawkin's even more 
enthusiastic endorsement of atheist Gods he claims ‘came into being’ (sic).

 From his book Launch: "A few years ago it struck me that there is a 
resource that is a provider of Wisdom, and consolation, and an ethical 
framework, and it's rather fascinating and has dominated the mental 
landscape of human beings for thousands of years I'm thinking, of 
course, of religion.

And the problem is, I'm an atheist.”

And it is Martin Heidegger (1889-1976) who was perhaps the greatest 
philosopher of the 20th century and we are challenged to comprehend how 
he could have been a life-long Nazi. [McCumber 1999:1] From his 
inception in 1927 with his magnum opus: “Being and Time” he clearly 
established himself as a foremost and important philosopher, but later 
betrayed his philosophical contributions and finished up until his death 
in 1976 as a contemptible apologist, first for Nazism and later for himself.

That his work on “Being and Time”, for all its achievements, is no 
innocent piece of philosophy. Although some have argued that it may not 
have directly encouraged Nazism, it clearly leaves Heidegger open to 
such an accusation. For in “Being and Time”, intelligibility is subject 
to the world: I can understand nothing that is not within the horizons 
of my world. Escape from this world is achievable not through critical 
reason but only in a mute and mystified “resolve”. [McCumber 1999:3]

Yet for much of the Western world, the difficulty of Heidegger's thought 
was for many years held to be almost insuperable in the medium of a 
foreign language, especially English. That this opinion is no longer so 
widely held can be seen both from the rapidly increasing number of 
translations of Heidegger's works and from the interest of a growing 
readership. There are signs moreover, that as a preeminent thinker of 
our age, Heidegger may be of interest to many who do not claim to have a 
wide knowledge of traditional metaphysics or whose concern with him may 
not be primarily philosophical at all.

Such readers have a certain advantage in bringing an open mind to a new 
problem, but they also have special difficulties in grappling with 
Heidegger. [King 2001:xviii]

However as Gadamer (1976) suggests when the layman wonders what 
philosophy really is, he has the idea that philosophising means 
defining, and taking responsibility for the need to define, the concepts 
in which all men think as homo[ios] sapien[tal]. Since as a rule we do 
not see this happen, we have helped ourselves by means of a doctrine of 
implicit definition.

In reality, however, such a “doctrine” is a mere verbalism as is the 
neologism starting with the German word: Dasein--which is not another 
name for ‘consciousness’, ’subject’, or ‘human being’. Heidegger 
introduces a vocabulary that challenges the reader [Stambaugh 
2010:xviii]. To say nothing of the Hebrew word: Dashen {(#4 - Daleth; 
#300 - Shin; #50 - Nun = #354 / #390 as H1878) specifically to anoint; 
figuratively to satisfy; denominatively (from H1880 ) to remove (fat) 
ashes (of sacrifices):—accept, anoint, take away the (receive) ashes 
(from), make (wax) fat}. For to call a definition implicit obviously 
means one finally comes to notice, on the basis of a number of sentences 
that someone has spoken. And he or she was thinking something 
unambiguous by means of using a concept. In this respect, philosophers 
are no different from other men, for other men too are in the habit of 
thinking definite things and avoiding contradictions. The lay opinion 
appealed to here is in fact dominated by the doctrine that universals or 
general ideas are mere names without any corresponding reality as 
nominalistic tradition of recent centuries, in considering linguistic 
reproduction as a kind of application of signs. It is obvious that 
artificial signs need an organisation and arrangement that excludes any 
ambiguity. Thus the demand arises that the illusionary problems of 
“metaphysics” must be unmasked by establishing the univocal use of 
language. [Gadamer 1971:125-126]

In his scheme to refresh philosophy, Heidegger, like Hegel (1770-1831), 
draws upon the earthy roots of his language and dialect. So a promising 
way of achieving this refreshment would be the exercise of translating 
“Being and Time” into the Anglo-Saxon language. Or perhaps into the 
Welsh or Gaelic idioms. Or for that matter, into Hebrew with its 
association to the earliest Semitic tongue and most probable origin of 
language. [King 2001:xv]

How then did Heidegger's publication in 1927 of “Being and Time”, and in 
1929 with his provocative book on Kant's “Critique of Pure Reason” in 
his treatise on “Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics” or his 1939 
lectures: “On the Essence of Language: The Metaphysics of Language and 
Essencing of the Word” in relation to the German Lutheran theologian and 
philosopher Johann Herder's 1772 treatise: “On the Origin of Language”, 
lead to the German Reich policy on the genocidal annihilation and 
nullification of Judaism as the absence of being? Herder (1744-1803) was 
the progenitor of the volkgeist (“Spirit of the people”) conception and 
had advanced a cultural superiority by the injunction: “Spew out the 
ugly slime of the Seine. Speak German, O You German.” Yet whilst he 
supported the French Revolution (1789–1799), his anti-authoritarianism, 
anti-militarism, and borderless humanitarianism values would generally 
have caused him to find the subsequent acts of political domination, war 
and empire which make up the vast bulk of these “great” deeds and events 
of history as not just morally unedifying, but morally repugnant. 
[Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy 2007]

Heidegger was struggling to distance his thought from the prevailing 
neo-Kantian tendency in German philosophical circles of the time, and 
this resulted in a highly original interpretation of Kant (1724-1804). 
 From the standpoint of the development of Heidegger’s own endeavour, 
his book: “Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics” is of pivotal importance 
because it takes up and extends a number of themes suggested in “Being 
and Time”, in particular the problem of how Heidegger proposed to enact 
his “destruction” of the metaphysical tradition and of what role his 
reading of Kant would play in that project. It’s this problematic about 
Kant’s Categories as it relates to Being in traditional metaphysics and 
the phenomenon of time which accounts for what some have called the 
“violence” of Heidegger’s interpretation as even he unequivocally 
acknowledged in the preface to his 1950 edition. [Taft 1997:xii, xx]

Heidegger asks, “What is the human being?” If I speak, so therefore I 
am. It is through and in the being, human language comes into being and 
vice versa; in the coming into being of language the human being “is” 
the human being. [Gregory 2004:87] How then was any one of Jewish 
descent considered as less than human after the 7 November 1938 
assassination of Ernst vom Rath, the third Secretary of the German 
Embassy in Paris by his reputed 17yo homosexual companion, a German born 
Polish Jew named Herschel Grynszpan. As the impetus for Kristallnacht 
within days following and the beginning of the Final Solution as 
Holocaust--Where was God? I do not desire to participate in the attitude 
of silence as others have promulgated to this very time, and neither do 
I consider subterfuge in the use of language as the only applicable and 
acceptable answer to such questions: “Vous êtes sur un site francophone. 
Yez la politesse et la correction de vous exprimer en français.”

This then relates to a little anecdote about my activities as timely 
actions over the siege in Toulouse, France on 21-23 March 2012 in 
relation to the earlier massacre of three paratroopers (ethnic and 
muslim), school children and a Jewish Rabbi by an Islamic extremist. 
Whilst enjoying a walk, I made some appraisals of the most probable 
cause of the event before it was disclosed as public news. In that the 7 
murders which occurred as terrorist activity were in part being 
attributed to abuses as starvation of Palestinian children due to an 
inability by the menfolk to pursue their livelihoods because of a 
confiscation of their tools of trade at border crossings in Israel. And 
as a consequence of my comments, as actions of goodwill and regard to 
European friends, I found my words as ideas (unity of being, dignity and 
discrimination by the State versus the animalistic behaviour of the 
perpetrators) being uttered from the mouths of the French President 
Nicolas Sarkozy and a Jewish Rabbi in Israel which were subsequently 
reported on the news.

In querying the political motive of UNICEF workers in the street that 
same day, I remarked that not even Kofi Annan would be able to take the 
“King” of Syria (President Bashar al-Assad) out of my hands--and indeed 
that is so today as Russia, China and America are all indebted to my 
intellectual property associated to governance.

There was in response to my calculated statements as provocations made 
towards the Republic of France (on alt.France) in their time of great 
need, an attempt by some person (René Groumal) without any remorse or 
apology, to falsely and slanderously characterise my public Internet 
statements as being fascist or neo-nazi. I am categorically neither. The 
source of my ideology as autonomic doctrines of unity, co-operation, 
freedom and democracy are not derived from Adolf Hitler. But that my 
prophet is Moses and therefore I am not anti-Semitic.

Governance (religion), angels and time, set in stone: Angel Solar Watch 
(replica) 1582 CE Chartres Cathedral, France

- dolf
- http://www.grapple369.com/Being.html

Now that's an unsound mind!



On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:58:24 +1100, dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:

>I�ve heard recently that Sydney radio shock jock, Karl Sandilands is 
>suffering from shrinking testicles. You ain't seen nothing until you've 
>had some fat queen sado-masochistic faggot actor as a gym junkie from 
>Sydney going troppo at being called a plump frump.
>
>Does your dictionary make haughty a lawful alternative to skanking 
>whore, or self conceit a synonym for your shit?
>
>Brad (bradvk2qq@gmail.com): �W[hat] T[he] F[uck] are you talking about?�
>
>atec77 (atec77@hotmail.com): �No one know[s] or cares. It is after all 
>just dork talk!�
>
>dolf: �Karl you�re a chook.�
>
>Ish (m@g.net): �I thought so. What�s the matter? Afraid of women?�
>
>Denis / Ish (denis.mattg@yahoo.de / ish.mattg@yahoo.de): �Is exactly 
>what I am�
>
>Ish (xm@c.net): �You can�t consider a faggot like you a �woman�.
>
>Is it really beyond you to believe a woman can like baseball and not 
>necessarily want to read about your obsessions in a baseball group? 
>Chauvinist!�.
>
>denis (mrwilson6982@yahoo.de): �You can't consider a faggot tranny like 
>you a �woman�.�
>
>dolf: �There�s only one queen and that�s Madonna bitch.�
>
>Ishtar (ishtarnec@gmail.com): �Fucking frog. Awful funny you show up 
>when the trolls do.�
>
>dolf: �Qu'est-ce? Aren�t you just the trolley dolly from the women's 
>hospital.� [B-Day Song (feature M.I.A) Madonna MDNA ? 2012 Boy Toy Inc.]
>
>What is a Nation? (Qu'est-ce qu'une nation?) is a 1882 essay by French 
>historian Ernst Renan (1823�1892), known for the statements that a 
>nation is "a daily referendum", and that nations are based as much on 
>what the people jointly forget, as what they remember. It is frequently 
>quoted or anthologized in works of history or political science 
>pertaining to nationalism. [Wikipedia 2012: Qu�est-ce?]
>
>M (storm@c.net): �What is this doing in a baseball group? Nobody here 
>gives a damn for your opinions, even that Rosecomm idiot plonked you. 
>Too bad...he might have said �Pete Rose belongs in the Hall of Fame 
>playing with homosexual-sex-obsessed dee-nis's pecker.� Now THAT would 
>be an appropriate job for him.�
>
>Barry OGrady (atheist@hotmail.com.au): �You don't understand yourself at 
>all. You think it clever not to punctuate. What are trying to prove?
>
>You probably think its cool to wear a baseball cap on backwards. You 
>conform to what you think is non conforming.�
>
>Old Jinglebollocks (old.jinglebollocks@gmail.com): �Doesn't matter any more.
>
>Can't be bothered even to read what you bums are writing on usenet.
>
>Fuck ye, the whole damned lot o' ye.�
>
>I thought Jamie Rowe was discriminatory in the manner by which he 
>undertook his seeking of housemates in Liverpool Street with Gay 
>Share-space was indulgently disrespectful of the person's dignity as 
>autonomic right. That collectively these radio personalities are by 
>their fascist dog commentary, not mindful of duty to State.
>
>On 28/03/12 6:22 AM, denis wrote:
>> In Leviticus 18:22 we read "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with
>> womankind it is abomination." Also in Leviticus 20:13 "If a man also
>> lie with mankind as he lieth with a woman, both of them have
>> committed an abomination, they shall surely be put to death, their
>> blood shall be upon them." In Deuteronomy 23:17 we read "There shall
>>  be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons
>> of Israel.".
>>
>> Its extremely clear what our Father in heaven has to say about
>> homosexuals. Other Old Testament verses on the subject can be found
>> in 1 Kings 14:24 and 15:12, II Kings 23:7, Isaiah 3:9 and Jeremiah
>> 23:14. There are more verses in the Bible on this subject, but I
>> think I have made my point. Some say the New Testament does not
>> address homosexuality at all. So, let us read 1 Corinthians 6:9 "No
>> ye not that the unrightous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be
>> not deceived, neither fornicators, nor idolators, nor adulterers, nor
>> effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind." Also in Jude 7,
>> Romans 1:22-32 and 1 Timothy 1:10. By the way, for those that don't
>> know the meaning of the word effeminate it means a man that takes on
>> the characteristics of a woman.
>>
>> So, as you can see, if any Judeo-Christian minister does not preach
>> against homosexuality, he is a liar and a deceiver. Homosexuality,
>> like a cancer, must be cut out of our society or it will grow until
>> it kills the body, like a cancer.
>
>On 28/03/12 4:27 PM, M wrote:
>> "denis"<mrwilson695563465346@gmail.com>  wrote in message
>> news:733dcc53-77a6-4745-b211-4c65b6cb7882@ur9g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>What is this doing in a baseball group? Nobody here gives a damn for
>> your opinions, even that Rosecomm idiot plonked you. Too bad...he
>> might have said "Pete Rose belongs in the Hall of Fame playing with
>> homosexual sex-obsessed dee-nis's pecker." Now THAT would be an
>> appropriate job for him.
>>
>>
>
>The foremost atheist Philosopher of our age recently launched his new 
>book �Religion for Atheists� and no atheists are interested in talking 
>about it, including all the ones who eagerly embraced Dawkin's even more 
>enthusiastic endorsement of atheist Gods he claims �came into being� (sic).
>
> From his book Launch: "A few years ago it struck me that there is a 
>resource that is a provider of Wisdom, and consolation, and an ethical 
>framework, and it's rather fascinating and has dominated the mental 
>landscape of human beings for thousands of years I'm thinking, of 
>course, of religion.
>
>And the problem is, I'm an atheist.�
>
>And it is Martin Heidegger (1889-1976) who was perhaps the greatest 
>philosopher of the 20th century and we are challenged to comprehend how 
>he could have been a life-long Nazi. [McCumber 1999:1] From his 
>inception in 1927 with his magnum opus: �Being and Time� he clearly 
>established himself as a foremost and important philosopher, but later 
>betrayed his philosophical contributions and finished up until his death 
>in 1976 as a contemptible apologist, first for Nazism and later for himself.
>
>That his work on �Being and Time�, for all its achievements, is no 
>innocent piece of philosophy. Although some have argued that it may not 
>have directly encouraged Nazism, it clearly leaves Heidegger open to 
>such an accusation. For in �Being and Time�, intelligibility is subject 
>to the world: I can understand nothing that is not within the horizons 
>of my world. Escape from this world is achievable not through critical 
>reason but only in a mute and mystified �resolve�. [McCumber 1999:3]
>
>Yet for much of the Western world, the difficulty of Heidegger's thought 
>was for many years held to be almost insuperable in the medium of a 
>foreign language, especially English. That this opinion is no longer so 
>widely held can be seen both from the rapidly increasing number of 
>translations of Heidegger's works and from the interest of a growing 
>readership. There are signs moreover, that as a preeminent thinker of 
>our age, Heidegger may be of interest to many who do not claim to have a 
>wide knowledge of traditional metaphysics or whose concern with him may 
>not be primarily philosophical at all.
>
>Such readers have a certain advantage in bringing an open mind to a new 
>problem, but they also have special difficulties in grappling with 
>Heidegger. [King 2001:xviii]
>
>However as Gadamer (1976) suggests when the layman wonders what 
>philosophy really is, he has the idea that philosophising means 
>defining, and taking responsibility for the need to define, the concepts 
>in which all men think as homo[ios] sapien[tal]. Since as a rule we do 
>not see this happen, we have helped ourselves by means of a doctrine of 
>implicit definition.
>
>In reality, however, such a �doctrine� is a mere verbalism as is the 
>neologism starting with the German word: Dasein--which is not another 
>name for �consciousness�, �subject�, or �human being�. Heidegger 
>introduces a vocabulary that challenges the reader [Stambaugh 
>2010:xviii]. To say nothing of the Hebrew word: Dashen {(#4 - Daleth; 
>#300 - Shin; #50 - Nun = #354 / #390 as H1878) specifically to anoint; 
>figuratively to satisfy; denominatively (from H1880 ) to remove (fat) 
>ashes (of sacrifices):�accept, anoint, take away the (receive) ashes 
>(from), make (wax) fat}. For to call a definition implicit obviously 
>means one finally comes to notice, on the basis of a number of sentences 
>that someone has spoken. And he or she was thinking something 
>unambiguous by means of using a concept. In this respect, philosophers 
>are no different from other men, for other men too are in the habit of 
>thinking definite things and avoiding contradictions. The lay opinion 
>appealed to here is in fact dominated by the doctrine that universals or 
>general ideas are mere names without any corresponding reality as 
>nominalistic tradition of recent centuries, in considering linguistic 
>reproduction as a kind of application of signs. It is obvious that 
>artificial signs need an organisation and arrangement that excludes any 
>ambiguity. Thus the demand arises that the illusionary problems of 
>�metaphysics� must be unmasked by establishing the univocal use of 
>language. [Gadamer 1971:125-126]
>
>In his scheme to refresh philosophy, Heidegger, like Hegel (1770-1831), 
>draws upon the earthy roots of his language and dialect. So a promising 
>way of achieving this refreshment would be the exercise of translating 
>�Being and Time� into the Anglo-Saxon language. Or perhaps into the 
>Welsh or Gaelic idioms. Or for that matter, into Hebrew with its 
>association to the earliest Semitic tongue and most probable origin of 
>language. [King 2001:xv]
>
>How then did Heidegger's publication in 1927 of �Being and Time�, and in 
>1929 with his provocative book on Kant's �Critique of Pure Reason� in 
>his treatise on �Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics� or his 1939 
>lectures: �On the Essence of Language: The Metaphysics of Language and 
>Essencing of the Word� in relation to the German Lutheran theologian and 
>philosopher Johann Herder's 1772 treatise: �On the Origin of Language�, 
>lead to the German Reich policy on the genocidal annihilation and 
>nullification of Judaism as the absence of being? Herder (1744-1803) was 
>the progenitor of the volkgeist (�Spirit of the people�) conception and 
>had advanced a cultural superiority by the injunction: �Spew out the 
>ugly slime of the Seine. Speak German, O You German.� Yet whilst he 
>supported the French Revolution (1789�1799), his anti-authoritarianism, 
>anti-militarism, and borderless humanitarianism values would generally 
>have caused him to find the subsequent acts of political domination, war 
>and empire which make up the vast bulk of these �great� deeds and events 
>of history as not just morally unedifying, but morally repugnant. 
>[Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy 2007]
>
>Heidegger was struggling to distance his thought from the prevailing 
>neo-Kantian tendency in German philosophical circles of the time, and 
>this resulted in a highly original interpretation of Kant (1724-1804). 
> From the standpoint of the development of Heidegger�s own endeavour, 
>his book: �Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics� is of pivotal importance 
>because it takes up and extends a number of themes suggested in �Being 
>and Time�, in particular the problem of how Heidegger proposed to enact 
>his �destruction� of the metaphysical tradition and of what role his 
>reading of Kant would play in that project. It�s this problematic about 
>Kant�s Categories as it relates to Being in traditional metaphysics and 
>the phenomenon of time which accounts for what some have called the 
>�violence� of Heidegger�s interpretation as even he unequivocally 
>acknowledged in the preface to his 1950 edition. [Taft 1997:xii, xx]
>
>Heidegger asks, �What is the human being?� If I speak, so therefore I 
>am. It is through and in the being, human language comes into being and 
>vice versa; in the coming into being of language the human being �is� 
>the human being. [Gregory 2004:87] How then was any one of Jewish 
>descent considered as less than human after the 7 November 1938 
>assassination of Ernst vom Rath, the third Secretary of the German 
>Embassy in Paris by his reputed 17yo homosexual companion, a German born 
>Polish Jew named Herschel Grynszpan. As the impetus for Kristallnacht 
>within days following and the beginning of the Final Solution as 
>Holocaust--Where was God? I do not desire to participate in the attitude 
>of silence as others have promulgated to this very time, and neither do 
>I consider subterfuge in the use of language as the only applicable and 
>acceptable answer to such questions: �Vous �tes sur un site francophone. 
>Yez la politesse et la correction de vous exprimer en fran�ais.�
>
>This then relates to a little anecdote about my activities as timely 
>actions over the siege in Toulouse, France on 21-23 March 2012 in 
>relation to the earlier massacre of three paratroopers (ethnic and 
>muslim), school children and a Jewish Rabbi by an Islamic extremist. 
>Whilst enjoying a walk, I made some appraisals of the most probable 
>cause of the event before it was disclosed as public news. In that the 7 
>murders which occurred as terrorist activity were in part being 
>attributed to abuses as starvation of Palestinian children due to an 
>inability by the menfolk to pursue their livelihoods because of a 
>confiscation of their tools of trade at border crossings in Israel. And 
>as a consequence of my comments, as actions of goodwill and regard to 
>European friends, I found my words as ideas (unity of being, dignity and 
>discrimination by the State versus the animalistic behaviour of the 
>perpetrators) being uttered from the mouths of the French President 
>Nicolas Sarkozy and a Jewish Rabbi in Israel which were subsequently 
>reported on the news.
>
>In querying the political motive of UNICEF workers in the street that 
>same day, I remarked that not even Kofi Annan would be able to take the 
>�King� of Syria (President Bashar al-Assad) out of my hands--and indeed 
>that is so today as Russia, China and America are all indebted to my 
>intellectual property associated to governance.
>
>There was in response to my calculated statements as provocations made 
>towards the Republic of France (on alt.France) in their time of great 
>need, an attempt by some person (Ren� Groumal) without any remorse or 
>apology, to falsely and slanderously characterise my public Internet 
>statements as being fascist or neo-nazi. I am categorically neither. The 
>source of my ideology as autonomic doctrines of unity, co-operation, 
>freedom and democracy are not derived from Adolf Hitler. But that my 
>prophet is Moses and therefore I am not anti-Semitic.
>
>Governance (religion), angels and time, set in stone: Angel Solar Watch 
>(replica) 1582 CE Chartres Cathedral, France
>
>- dolf
>- http://www.grapple369.com/Being.html

=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=
God is a spirit. 0% proof!

On 30/03/12 9:44 AM, Barry OGrady wrote:
> Now that's an unsound mind!
>

I’ve heard recently that Sydney radio shock jock, Karl Sandilands is 
suffering from shrinking testicles. You ain't seen nothing until you've 
had some fat queen sado-masochistic faggot actor as a gym junkie from 
Sydney going troppo at being called a plump frump.

Does your dictionary make haughty a lawful alternative to skanking 
whore, or self conceit a synonym for your shit?

Brad (bradvk2qq@gmail.com): “W[hat] T[he] F[uck] are you talking about?”

atec77 (atec77@hotmail.com): “No one know[s] or cares. It is after all 
just dork talk!”

dolf: “Karl you’re a chook.”

Ish (m@g.net): “I thought so. What’s the matter? Afraid of women?”

Denis / Ish (denis.mattg@yahoo.de / ish.mattg@yahoo.de): “Is exactly 
what I am”

Ish (xm@c.net): “You can’t consider a faggot like you a ‘woman’.

Is it really beyond you to believe a woman can like baseball and not 
necessarily want to read about your obsessions in a baseball group? 
Chauvinist!”.

denis (mrwilson6982@yahoo.de): “You can't consider a faggot tranny like 
you a ‘woman’.”

dolf: “There’s only one queen and that’s Madonna bitch.”

Ishtar (ishtarnec@gmail.com): “Fucking frog. Awful funny you show up 
when the trolls do.”

dolf: “Qu'est-ce? Aren’t you just the trolley dolly from the women's 
hospital.” [B-Day Song (feature M.I.A) Madonna MDNA ℗ 2012 Boy Toy Inc.]

What is a Nation? (Qu'est-ce qu'une nation?) is a 1882 essay by French 
historian Ernst Renan (1823–1892), known for the statements that a 
nation is "a daily referendum", and that nations are based as much on 
what the people jointly forget, as what they remember. It is frequently 
quoted or anthologized in works of history or political science 
pertaining to nationalism. [Wikipedia 2012: Qu’est-ce?]

M (storm@c.net): “What is this doing in a baseball group? Nobody here 
gives a damn for your opinions, even that Rosecomm idiot plonked you. 
Too bad...he might have said ‘Pete Rose belongs in the Hall of Fame 
playing with homosexual-sex-obsessed dee-nis's pecker.’ Now THAT would 
be an appropriate job for him.”

Barry OGrady (atheist@hotmail.com.au): “You don't understand yourself at 
all. You think it clever not to punctuate. What are trying to prove?

You probably think its cool to wear a baseball cap on backwards. You 
conform to what you think is non conforming.”

dolf: “That Catholic bitch apologist Kristina Keneally is dismissing the 
fact that religious unbelief and disbelief which are your matters of 
conscious as indulgence and belief is also someone else's human rights 
claim which you are diminishing--Keep silent you skanking whore because 
I am speaking in judgement against your soul.

Your fucked up Catholic Religious belief gives you, as an American 
refugee, the right to Australian Citizenship and political party 
privilege--But not Me!

I accuse you of indifference. Stop buying your meat pies from Tony 
Abbott, you are no longer welcome.”

Old Jinglebollocks (old.jinglebollocks@gmail.com): “Doesn't matter any more.

Can't be bothered even to read what you bums are writing on usenet.

Fuck ye, the whole damned lot o' ye.”

I thought Jamie Rowe was discriminatory in the manner by which he 
undertook his seeking of housemates in Liverpool Street with Gay 
Share-space was indulgently disrespectful of the person's dignity as 
autonomic right. That collectively these radio personalities are by 
their fascist dog commentary, not mindful of duty to State. I also 
called the Chief Commissioner office with that same calmness of mind--it 
is therefore dishonest to convey it as otherwise.

Defence Minister Stephen Swan in addressing the media on 7 March 2012, 
over ADF shenanigans does raise some matters of parallelism and I do 
note as advice in which I agree.

On 13 March 2012 I followed my community health nurse and confidant’s 
recent example of determined conduct as a statement of dissatisfaction 
made in resignation and contempt over the unlawful character and the 
frenzied, brutalising, hate filled manner by which the New South Wales 
Police Service and Saint Vincent’s Acute Care Team have conducted 
themselves in my affairs.

Following their advice that these persons were seeking to make a 
submission to a Magistrate’s Court in order to forcibly gain entry into 
my apartment and access me as to the nature, condition and circumstances 
of my psychological health--they again resorted to unlawful, threatening 
and unbridled aggression in their conduct outside my premises and a week 
later they murdered a Brazilian youth (certainly not a Brazil Holland 
hero) by tasering him in a circumstance of mistaken identity over an 
alleged theft of biscuits (a wafer perhaps?).

This was now the 3rd occasion where this intrusion against me had 
occurred and which I viewed as an unwanted, unreasoned and aggressive 
conduct against my autonomy and rights under the State as a person of 
intellect, integrity and dignity who is generally of a calm and happy 
disposition. This conduct by them has unnecessarily tainted, prejudiced 
and rendered toxic my living environment--goodness knows what 
monstrosity the neighbours think of me.

These grievous incursions by State Authorities who have no desire to 
give any accountability for their actions and neither do they wish to 
grant me a modicum of credence with respects to my religious belief as 
being a substantial reality. Accordingly, I have left both Sydney and 
the State of New South Wales with no intention of ever returning to 
their culture of disrespect, which lacks civility in its inhumanity. I 
have therefore terminated my lease and left 3rd parties to pack and 
convey my goods and chattels interstate at a cost of over $4,000. Given 
this my book has now reached a level of completeness. I believe that 
such actions by me as public defiance of the State’s conduct which I 
have taken with due consideration as a calculated exercise of voluntary 
will accompanying determined action against them, will invariably 
manifest a disturbing effect and consequence upon their enjoyment as 
participation in any further ANZAC celebrations.

As I crossed the State border into Victoria as a safer haven from their 
persecutions and traumatising conduct, I advised those parties of my 
intention to leave the State.

This departure gave me an opportunity to meet a female friend of Private 
Jake Kovco who had some life experiences which augmented mine. There was 
no disagreement about the plausibility of any aspect about my belief 
that Kovco’s conduct was deliberate and being passed off as accidental. 
His making of a video record of his service was in itself an unusual 
act. I formed the view from the sloppy and casual manner by which he 
portrayed himself that it seemed different to how other soldiers are 
normally portrayed in the media.

The casualness as his routine conduct was at odds with his disruption of 
determined policy events. That the uncharacteristic behaviour about his 
making of the video record seems to support the notion as a view he 
held, that the Australian soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan were 
forgotten by the general populace, who went about their lives as though 
they weren’t there and what they were doing wasn’t important. He was in 
fact undertaking a course of action which required complex processes 
that were not normal for him. That his intention to have his body return 
on ANZAC day was a dishonourable and opportunistic conduct as an attempt 
to impose himself upon the State in a most undignified manner.

That I was right to protest as I had done and what a waste of time and 
money the Military Tribunals into his death were.

Also conveyed to me was an equivalent experience to my own, about 
private sexual acts being recorded by others and unbeknownst to 
ourselves, were then publicised amongst a group in an attempt to 
dishonour a person’s dignity and privacy--That this was technically a 
rape because the sexual act accompanied a video recording which was made 
against a person’s will.

Have you met my kangaroo Jingoist bitch prostitute: Shane Dowling?

"We know what you mean by Faceless Men, Krudd, you anti-termite, errrrhm 
semite.....Coz Mark Arsebib, is just an ass-licker.” [7 March 2012, 
Shane Dowling alias Kangaroo Court Australia @ illusionz.admin@gmail.com]

The dolt defamation on the Internet is going to come to an end!

“[With opposition] 101 [asks “Does the Zionist Lobby have blood on its 
hands in Australia?”] [7 March 2012, Shane Dowling alias Kangaroo Court 
Australia @ illusionz.admin@gmail.com]

Semantics!

In this regard, at about 1840 hours on 19 February 2012, I had two 
uniformed police from Kings Cross, namely Constable Peter Mullans and 
Constable Alex Dews attended at my home address with two plain clothes 
persons. A female who identified as Cherie Jenkins and another male 
person who showed a reluctance to divulge his name as David Manley.

There was a reluctant and obscuring conduct by David Manley as a refusal 
to convey to me his identity in my own home. This antagonism towards me 
within my own home, demonstrated to me that there was here a committed 
and determined agenda of which I was not being fully informed of.

I asked him upon what evidence as the grounds are they now reliant to 
substantiate the claim that my conduct of 16 February 2012 constituted a 
psychotic behaviour needing intervention as Dr Mark Bloch also 
improperly asserted on that occasion.

I denied that my conduct was in any way aggressive and I produced to 
those persons a medical record made by Dr. Diane Williams following my 
attendance at the Sydney Hospital on 18 February 2012 following a 
pedestrian/motor vehicle accident earlier that day which recorded the 
following observations: "Calm and cooperative, answering questions 
appropriately, alert and oriented."

As a consequence of David Manley's brief but uninformed statements about 
my swollen left ankle which was injured by the car accident on 18 
February 2012, I at my earliest convenience the next day at 8:00am, 
again attended at the Sydney Hospital with the view of obtaining x-rays 
and there was no evidence of acute fracture and a simple analgesia as 
paracetamol/ibuprofen was recommended.

I also refused their request to further assessment as unnecessary as I 
have full private medical insurance have an implied freedom to choose my 
own doctor. I advised that I was under the regular care of a doctor for 
which there existed a treatment plan and that my next appointment was 
scheduled for the 28 February 2012 whereupon I was expectant to have my 
stitches removed from my head.

Determining Consciousness and Cognitive Intent as Implied by Human Speech
I asked them if they wished to take a look at the current focus of my 
informal research activity involving making a determination of 
consciousness and cognitive intent which is implied by human speech. 
However they declined this offer on the grounds that they were not 
psychiatrists and therefore not equipped to examine any paradigms of 
mind. As there were no continuing grounds for their involvement they 
left and I then illustrated the feasibility of obtaining an idea of 
cognition and conscious intent from narrative by memeBraining the 
statement I had made to Constable Mullans previously:

“11 March 2012

Dear Steve Jobs,

I know that the iPhone 4S contract with Telstra, Sydney Australia was 
entered into on 14 October 2011 being some matter of days after your 
death 5 October 2011--were you buried by then?

Today I went to the Apple Store and Telstra Store in Sydney and lamented 
how the screen which was now cracked, and unable to keep up with the 
rigours my life demanded.

Of necessity on 18 February 2012, as the police statement of the day 
conveys. I as a pedestrian faced with a driver determined and no intent 
to stop, despite my motioning to so do. Found recourse, as an act of 
self preservation, in grappling the bonnet of the moving vehicle.

It took me 200 metres down the street of Darlinghurst Rd, Bayswater Rd 
Kings Cross before I got off the car--he never stopped to let me though.

The iPhone (it may have been in my rear pocket or it could have been in 
my hand) didn't leave my presence of being--I wanted to know what 
guarantee of warranty I had hereafter.

I feel let down today by those who represented you and I am inclined by 
an economic prospect of terminating the contract with the 
telecommunications supplier as a more sensible thing to do--rather than 
getting a new iPhone.

I'll put you in a box, which I still kept from the day of the sale.

And go with your competitor.”

I recently said to Sergeant Kate Baker of the NSW Police that with all 
due respect I was a brevet Sergeant of Police at 24 years of age. And 
that the name dolf had been adopted (as an identity because of 
legislative changes which allowed name changes on the birth certificate) 
whilst a member of the police service within the computer services 
division--it was published as such in the Police Gazette.

I was the person who introduced the first six micro-computers into the 
Victoria Police Service. That specialist areas such as the homicide 
squad, were able to obtain any computing resources as their first 
computer, was in some part due to ability by me to withstand any 
organisational antagonism to the contrary.

And the same goes for Victoria's Bureau of Criminal Intelligence as 
their first network implemented by a Detective Geoff Woodrow (where is 
that man these days?)--he deployed the DOS based application 
KnowledgeMan (Micro Data Base Systems: mdbs) at my recommendation and I 
was most proud of his abilities.

That my present-day research into the existence of a noumenal reality 
(the uncut block of Daoism or Celestial Hierarchy of Western governance 
and religious belief) which was first surmised by Immanuel Kant. 
Actually has its grounding in my former police service and interest in 
mdbs' other product Guru as the bigger brother to the Knowledgeman 
application and that being the notion of attributed time associated to 
consciousness, the metaphysical origins of language having a 
cosmological basis as grounding in the instance of time as rational PI 
(22nd Priestly service of GAMUL (a recompense; camel) / 7 days of the 
week @ Equinoctial on Wednesday 20 March 1996 / New Moon Thursday 21 
March 1996) / ENNEAD, and of a desire to do further investigations into 
memeBraining a recent Statement of a Witness document into Incident: 
E47210203 which was made to a Constable Mullans of the NSW Police on 18 
February 2012.

I illustrated the feasibility of memeBraining the statement to get some 
idea of cognition and conscious intent to Constable Mullans on the 
following day when he further attended at my home address at 6:40pm.

The view being, that it ought to have some relevance to the narrative 
itself. Which he was at pains to ensure was not led by himself, but 
articulated by me at his facilitation. And from there we ought to obtain 
a very rich set of categories from which fuzzy logic tests can be made 
as appraisals, to visualise the temporal areas where the steeping by 
osmosis to inform the consciousness occurs within the time continuum and 
determine whether it has any continuing empathy with the text of OATH (I 
swear by Almighty God) being the Hebrew / Greek lexicon association by 
Strong's Number to the actual Biblical Text.

To this end, I have today purchased the following O'Reilly Publications:

JavaScript Web Applications, (c) 2011 Alex MacCaw, JQuery Developer's 
Guide to Moving State to the Client
JavaScript, (c) 2011 David Flanagan, The Definitive Guide: Activate Your 
Web Pages

With the view of developing the memeBrain perspective by updating the 
existing Grapple virtualisation cube prototype and functions to a 
semantical equivalence as used by the JQuery Tool and to deploy it as a 
layer to that architecture.

And from a cursory read of JavaScript: The Definitive Guide, we can use 
the enumeration() example to define our vMeme() as class object--this is 
still work in progress, but none the less, the result of an enjoyable 
afternoon:--

/*
     memeBrain:     Determining Consciousness and Cognitive Intent as 
Implied by Human Speech
     Author:        Dolf Leendert Boek

     Revision:     2012.02.22

*/

// Example 6-1: Creating a new object that inherits from a prototype
// O'Reilly's Javascript The Definitive Guide 2011:119

function inherit(p) {

     switch (true) {
     case (p == null):
         return {'71#14': "Type Error"};
         break;

     case (Object.create):
         return Object.create(p);
         break;

     }

     try {
         if (typeof(p) != "object")
             throw {s: 71, e: 14}; // Type Error

         function f() {};
         f.prototype = p;
         return new f();

     } catch (err) {
         switch(true) {
         case (err.s == 71 && err.e == 14):
             return {'71#14': "Type Error"};
             break;

         default:
             return {'15#69': "Unknown Error"};
             break;

         }
     }
}

// Example 9-7: Enumerated types in JavaScript
// O'Reilly's Javascript The Definitive Guide 2011:217

function createMeme(idea) {

     // Dummy constructor

     var createMeme = function() {};

     // Enumerated values inherit from this object

     var proto = createMeme.prototype = {
         constructor: createMeme,
         toString: function() { return this.name; },
         valueOf: function() { return this.value; },
         toJSON: function() { return this.value; }
     };

     // Set the enumerated value data objects

     createMeme.$names = [];
     createMeme.$error = [];
     createMeme.chronos = {};
     createMeme.supernal = {};
     createMeme.ego = {};
     createMeme.male = {};
     createMeme.female = {};

     // Now create the instances of this new type

     for (item in idea) {

         var e = inherit(proto);

         switch (true) {
         case (typeof(e['71#14']) != "undefined"):
             createMeme.$error[createMeme.$error.length] = [e['71#14'], 
': ', item].join('');
             break;

         case (typeof(e['15#69']) != "undefined"):
             createMeme.$error[createMeme.$error.length] = [e['15#69'], 
': ', item].join('');
             break;

         case (item == "chronos"):
         case (item == "supernal"):
         case (item == "ego"):
             e.name = item;
             e.value = idea[item];
             createMeme[item] = e;
             createMeme.$names[createMeme.$names.length] = item;
             break;

         case (item == "male"):
         case (item == "female"):
             e._name = item;
             e.value = inherit(idea[item]);
             createMeme[item] = e;
             createMeme.$names[createMeme.$names.length] = item;
             break;
         }
     }

     // A class method for iterating the instances of the class

     createMeme.foreach = function(f, c) {

         for (var i = 0; i < this.$names.length; i++)
             f.call(c, this[this.$names[i]]);

     };

     return createMeme;
}

var vMeme = createMeme({
     chronos: null,
     supernal: 342,
     male: {
         vBronze: 21,
         vPurple: 26,
         vRed: 42,
         vBlue: 52,
         vOrange: 57,
         vGreen: 39,
         vYellow: 68,
         vCyan: 31,
         vCoral: 6,
     },
     ego: 249,
     female: {
         vBronze: 21,
         vPurple: 5,
         vRed: 16,
         vBlue: 10,
         vOrange: 5,
         vGreen: 63,
         vYellow: 29,
         vCyan: 44,
         vCoral: 56
     }
});


Additionally I had contact by telephone from a person named Greg who 
also purported to be a nurse from St Vincent's Hospital--however as it 
was a blocked number I conveyed to him such anonymous conduct really 
wasn't in regard of me.

He again made the false and mischievous characterisation of my conduct 
on 16 February 2012 as being threatening of Dr Mark Bloch and therefore 
substantial--which I categorically denied. I said that I had demanded Dr 
Mark Bloch give substantiation of what aspects of writing he found 
objectionable and that his conduct constituted slander.

Once again he was making scurrilous and fictitious characterisations as 
distortions that he was projecting at me as traumatising and vilifying 
conduct which had no knowledge of the substantive reality to the 
contrary--that I had delivered letters to Dr Mark Bloch requesting 
evidence of the heretofore non-existent grounds for my initial arrest as 
involuntary lodgement and that in the real absence of those grounds, I 
was intent on pursuing legal action and that they were appraised of my 
intentions as considered actions to contest the veracity as lack of 
truthfulness inherent in Dr Mark Bloch's characterisations of me.

This same nurse again attended at my home in the company of a doctor 
(identity unknown) at approximately 1143 hrs on 22 February 2012. We had 
a further discussion via the intercom. I asked them to cease besieging 
me and especially at home. As there was no immediacy as the substantive 
and necessary grounds for their intervention beyond the fictitious and 
pretentious claims of threatening behaviour which they have kept making 
in the knowledge that it is false, as I have now repeatedly denied it.

Or are you wishing to now assail me in relation to other events as 
unwarranted and undesired further disruption and interference in my 
preparation of argumentation for other legal matters associated with the 
preparation of my book (as evidence in support of those legal claims) 
and research undertaken over the last 16 years?

I have previously on 21 May 2008 sought a voluntary consultation with Dr 
Peter Sternhell who was a psychiatrist at Saint Vincent’s Hospital 
following a referral from Dr Mark Bloch--I did so in order to determine 
the appropriate course of legal action and priority to take in a number 
of complex matters.

Whilst the psychiatrist was capable of making agreeable notes about 
those matters which I would simply expand--his was a lack of awareness 
of the details about my participation in the Kovco fiasco. Beyond 
acknowledging my activism as having marked me out in some way, the 
psychiatrist couldn't understand why I would be involved in a rainbow 
sash protest against Kovco's effeminate conduct and by the same rainbow 
sash worn in protests over refusal of Communion perpetuated by Cardinal 
George Pell in 1998 and 2000.

And hence he then made irrational and dissonant associations as my 
implied lack of lucid connectedness and the cause for a social 
disconnectedness between myself and Kovco which he described by a 
fiction: "Part of this related to the recent death of Private Jake Kovco 
who had lived in the same area in the same time. Mr Kovco made 
references to past childhood sexual abuse and Aaron saw this as 
impacting on him--Aaron did not know him personally, but felt that his 
in some way, impacted on him."

As my twin sister and I am now estranged over this issue as my ANZAC day 
protest and her siding with Kovco's mother whom she knows personally is 
the reason I will not even attend her funeral should she precede me.

The psychiatrist acknowledges the complexity of my unusual belief system 
and the degree to which it affects his life, and on this basis he 
considered me as having a delusional disorder. That is, he holds a very 
complex system of beliefs that other people do not (or refuse to) 
understand and which tends to impinge adversely on much of his life due 
to his preoccupation with it. It also reflects his continuing antipathy 
towards organisational religion, particularly the Roman Catholic Church.

Much of the antipathy, of course, has a justifiable basis, eg: 
homophobic comments that are made in that it conflicts with the Church's 
official teachings, a lack of clarity over holocaust denial, Pope 
Benedict's obscurity over the 75th anniversary when the office of Holy 
See signed the Concordant with the German Reich.

"Aaron spent much of today's interview telling me about the dispute with 
the insurance company and referred often to a very complex philosophical 
and metaphysical system he had developed. It involves use of number, 
numerology, elements of Jewish Kabbalah, use of the lunar calendar and 
the original Julian calendar."

"Due to the complexity of his ideas, I could not follow his reasoning. 
He spoke at length about the dispute with the Insurer and described, in 
part, a very complex philosophical and metaphysical system that he has 
developed that involves numerology, ancient texts, and ancient Chinese 
political treatise including the Dao Te Ching."

It is clear then that the statements made by the hospital's psychiatrist 
are faulty, in being a conflict of values in support of the employer as 
organisational religious ethos which fails to give any substantiation to 
its prejudiced statements with respects to homosexuality and their 
substantiated claims to religious belief as Christian identity and that 
any reliance upon them is only based on hysteria--The psychiatrist 
acknowledges that the "discrimination against me occurs because he is 
Dutch and that people who are married with a religious faith are 
automatically against him because he is also gay and HIV-positive. He 
held these beliefs with absolute conviction."

I also hold with absolute conviction, that any evidence of a ritualised 
act of marriage associated to Roman Catholic (and other Christian) 
religious belief by person’s who have subjected me to any refusal as 
attendance to my requests for action and closure in outstanding legal 
matters--is to be now considered the prima facie grounds for any 
prejudiced conduct towards me. You are not any longer free men in a 
democracy but now slaves.

That the complexity of my unusual belief system is exaggerated by this 
psychiatrist because it conveys a description of a ternary system of 
number as an alternative to the binary (heteros) apparatus as the 
philosophical/theological basis to the ecclesiastical practice of 
marriage used by the Catholic Church. That if the psychiatrist himself 
is married within a religious faith which includes the rite of 
communion, then he subscribes to an equivalent complex system of belief 
and idea as the basis of delusion is not foreign to him--as he claims.

Furthermore this complexity of belief which he claims is beyond his 
understanding is equally a paradigm of mind related to psychiatry (and 
the field of activity of the person for whom I wrote my paradigm), 
Godhead and Governance of State and Church as theory of number and 
metaphysical origins of language--my model provides a substantiation of 
Christian identity and its perceived categories of the noumenal reality 
as a technology which is entirely embedded within the Biblical narrative.

As such St Vincent's Hospital is a Roman Catholic Institution which is 
operated by a religious order of nuns in accordance with its Catholic 
values as a claim to a complex philosophical and theological belief 
system and the basis for their claimed Christian identity. The 
psychiatrist is therefore disingenuous and fallacious in his claim of my 
having a delusional disorder on the basis of holding a belief and value 
system.

He would have us believe that whilst he organisationally participates in 
a normality, which subscribes to a complex system of philosophical / 
theological belief that he feels no obligation to describe or to 
substantiate his understanding of (excepting as a paradigm of mind) such 
belief and yet when I subscribe to an equivalent complex system of 
philosophical / theological belief, this alternative reality he 
describes as an incomprehensibility and an abnormal human condition.

My statement of fact, which you misinterpreted as a claim, is not in 
error because it describes reality.

The subject matter, beyond the scope of belief, is not significant and 
has no impact on the concept of belief versus an absence of belief.

Your attempt to manipulate the words brings further question into the 
credibility of your claim because you are confirming that you are having 
difficulty with simple clarity.

Saint Vincent's Hospital is hereby advised that I make a claim as a 
homosexual to a complex philosophical/theological system of belief, 
which is a substantiated claim to Christian identity that is fully and 
rationally articulated. And which is not the basis of a delusional 
disorder as this psychiatrist has falsely claimed as the cause for the 
continuation of a culture of persecution as dominant character of life 
within Australia--As the essential culture of opposition which is the 
Catholic Church, its Institutions and its people as parasite.

Accordingly, this psychiatrist and Saint Vincent's hospital are to 
provide an apology for its past persecutions and it’s traumatising 
effect and those prejudiced actions by Cardinal Pell which have been 
directed against my religious belief as philosophical/theological claim 
to Christian identity and by that belief, I assert a claim to a 
sovereignty of autonomy as a prerogative which is above that being 
claimed by any member of the Catholic Church as their indulgence of a 
tokenistic wafer, as no communion ever again between us.

Theo Bekkers: (theodoreb@bigpond.com.au): “So it has value for you 
because you do/don't, sort-of-might believe. That sounds very valuable 
to me. I don't have a position on the taste of Yak milk. I treasure that 
non-position.”

Pnyikos (nyikos2@bellsouth.net): “Oh, wait, I overlooked the smiley. 
What does it mean in this case?

If it means, ‘My, that was quite a *bon mot*, as well as being right on 
target’ then my analysis stands.”

dolf: “And the wafer didn't crumble, nor was it sloppy when it was 
shoved up where the sun don't shine.”

Zen teachings can be likened to "the finger pointing at the moon". Zen 
teachings point to the moon, awakening, the realization of the nature of 
reality, which is devoid of independently existing "things". But the 
Zen-tradition also warns against taking its teachings, the pointing 
finger, to be this insight itself:

Wujin Chang, a nun, asked the Sixth Zen patriarch, Hui Neng, for help in 
understanding the Mahanirvana Sutra. The master answered that he could 
not read, but if the nun would read it aloud for him, he would do his 
best to help her. The nun then asked, "If you can't even read the words, 
how can you understand the truth behind them?"

"Truth and words are unrelated. Truth can be compared to the moon," 
answered Hui Neng, pointing to the moon with his finger, "And words can 
be compared to a finger. I can use my finger to point out the moon, but 
my finger is not the moon, and you don't need my finger in order to be 
able to see the moon".

This warning against confusing the finger and the moon resembles the 
Diamond-sutra: [E]very disciple who is seeking Anuttara-samyak sambhodi 
should discard, not only conceptions of one's own selfhood, other 
selves, living beings and a Universal Selfhood, but should discard, 
also, all ideas about such conceptions and all ideas about the 
non-existence of such conceptions. While the Tathagata, in his teaching, 
constantly makes use of conceptions and ideas about them, disciples 
should keep in mind the unreality of all such conceptions and ideas. 
[Wikipedia 2012: ZEN]


That the Roman Catholic Church and especially the religious order which 
operates, the Saint Vincent's Hospital cannot now make any substantiated 
claim of Christian identity in the denial of my own belief and that they 
are to cease making such misrepresented and false claims. Of course the 
consequence of this will be a collapse of the religious order which owns 
the hospital and all its property holdings will in due course to be 
forfeited by the Church and provided in compensation to me for the 
persecutions made by the Roman Catholic Church, its Institutions and its 
people.

Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: “Hi!”

dolf: “How are you doing?”

Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: “I’m good thanks… How are you?”

dolf: “I’ve had one hell of a day.”

Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: “Sorry… You ok? What’s up?”

dolf: “It’s all in a day’s work mate--I’ve just put an end to the 
Catholic Church, and in so doing created the opportunity for the 
Commonwealth of Australia to be a Republic by deposing the Queen.

And nobody can say thanks!”

Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: “Well that’s a pretty kick ass day. 
I despise both. So thanks from me :)”

dolf: “You are welcome anytime--it’s true I have done so.

It’s a shocking reality for them.”

Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: “I’m sure but you’ve done us all a 
favour.”

dolf: “I spent 3hrs today pleading my cause in front of psychiatrists so 
that they wouldn’t lock me up again due to persecutions by a gay doctor.

They did not appreciate that in justifying my claims over their wrongful 
conduct, they then had a duty of restitution for such a crime and their 
traumatising conduct in that perverse act.”

Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: “What can I say to that :)”

dolf: “My love for them has gone cold.”

Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: “Hehe me too now.”

dolf: “Not one of them has sufficient integrity for loyalty and neither 
do I hold any dear enough to call friend.”

Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: “Both are corrupt.”

dolf: “Each seeks after his own.”

Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: “For sure!”

Tactical Advantage: “How was your weekend??”

dolf: “Very productive, I was overcome by a revelation, which I was able 
to put into words.

Today I spent 3 hours with psychiatrists as Saint Vincent's Hospital, 
pleading with them over my liberty so that they may understand the 
extent, magnitude and gravity of my legal claim against the hospital (as 
a Roman Catholic Institution) and of my authorities under the 
Commonwealth which I have as a prerogative and the substantial (and not 
a delusional) reality which others find most threatening. Their 
inability or refusal to meet their obligations of substantiation to 
justify what is now considered unlawful by them, has now given me the 
lawful ability to take a determined, forceful and punitive action as 
retribution against them.

I was able to walk out of the place happy in the knowledge that they are 
at the very least aware of the trauma which resulted following my 
experience of persecutions from Dr Mark Bloch and the hospital’s 
consequential besieging conduct. By happenstance, a consequence of my 
being struck by a motor vehicle on the day immediately after such lawful 
and considered contest against this doctor’s deliberative distortions, 
unethical and perverse conduct. Was the opportunity to obtain two 
independent medical assessments to the contrary and in denial as 
disqualification of Saint Vincent’s Hospital’s conduct. These 
alternative medical opinions are distinguished by the absence of any 
reference to the traumatic effect which was consequential to the 
sustained injuries and clearly convey an alert, calm, responsive and 
considered disposition.

The fascinating thing being, that Saint Vincent’s Hospital was acting 
outside the permissibility of authority which the legislation grants as 
power to effect an involuntary admission. That in the circumstance of 
having obtained two independent medical opinions within 24 hours 
following a car accident, as the contrary evidence of a calm disposition 
and refutations of any threats tendered by evidence as to the 
non-existent basis of the original claimed intent. That they do not have 
an authority to besiege or to detain me in such a circumstance so as to 
cause a person to be traumatised by such unrestrained and frenzied 
conduct as theirs. And in having established that such criteria for 
involvement as non existent, neither do they have any imperative to 
compel me by a hand delivered notice, of the mandated requirement for an 
attendance made on the false claim of a fresh criteria for assessment. 
Which establishes that the hospital, had no remaining impetus as 
legislative authority to detain, summons me to attend or effect my 
involuntary surrender on what is only inconsequential justification and 
rendered effectual by untruthful obstructions made of the lawful cause 
and integrity of my action.

On five occasions there were attempts to scurrilously characterise the 
conduct of intentioned behaviour with fictions. That I tested the extent 
of the voluntary freedom which I had available to me against their 
discretionary use of the permissibility of authority under the 
legislation. And I did so by standing up and expressing a need to 
leave--which in being told that I could not now do and had to remain, 
suggested clearly that I was being improperly held as misuse of the 
legislative authority.

I negotiated by verbal agreement, the terms of treatment for effecting 
recovery as following: “They have agreed that my contesting the doctor’s 
conduct is without grounds for intervention by them--that matter is 
closed. And agreed with my suggestion, that I have been recently 
traumatised by actions of others and that I ought to enjoy 3 months of 
tranquil intervention co-ordinated via my General Practitioner.”

This becomes a test of ethical conduct as to the compliance given by the 
Psychiatry Registrar Dr Lyn Chiem and as the senior Psychiatrist Dr 
McGeorge, who has now placed himself into jeopardy as loss of career and 
as a matter of public scrutiny. And consequently, by letter dated 29 
February 2012 they have convincingly failed to dignify their conduct as 
being lawful. Their response attempts to obscure by designating as 
“strictly private and confidential” what is of vital public interest. In 
that it not only fails to convey what was “discussed and agreed upon 
from that appointment” but attempts to re-establish the priority 
emphasis of which party has accountability for co-ordinating that care: 
“You will continue to engage with Vincent’s Mental Health Services 
through your case manager […] and we will liaise with your GP.” But 
Saint Vincent’s Hospital has now been delivered a fatal blow which will 
destroy their religious belief and it will cost them $millions in 
compensation.

My own doctor the next day, read the letters of demand which I made to 
Dr Mark Bloch and queried why I had provided a copy to the Sydney 
Holocaust Museum. In giving him a copy of my book on CD ROM, I remarked 
of my capability to argue (as I do in one of my chapters) against the 
German Philosopher Heidegger as the foremost philosopher of the 21st 
century. Whilst the subject is too weighty and burdensome for 32yo 
SexyGerman79 who fell silent, but had there been any infraction of 
Jewish sensibilities, we would have heard the outrage. And there has 
been none of which I have been made aware. He then brought up the 
circumstance of the recent and extraordinary unrest as outrage which is 
promulgated throughout the Muslim world--Well its already 10 years into 
the war, and the Americans have only just now determined which “Shock 
and Awe” tactic was the most effective way to prosecute the war. Then 
you simply just fuck them over with a feigned sincerity as apology for 
what was accidental in action. But is always known by its consequential 
effect and the reality of it being viewed by others as an intentioned 
evil malice.

Perhaps it is really just a consideration as evidence of the hypocrisy 
which is intrinsic to Islamic religious belief, because there has been 
no similar outrage about the sacrilegious character of my own cartoon 
and surreal painting (self portrait) as a pillorying and polymorphic 
crucifixion of Christ (1996). They may well find it one day, and whilst 
this deification will surely offend Roman Catholics, who would consider 
it a debasement of their most sacred symbols, and their cultural 
response is a haunting reality which will never leave them. As they are 
entirely adverse towards it as the single cause and a reminder to them 
for the remaining term of their natural life, that theirs is a most 
certain destiny and a rampage towards a final and an everlasting death. 
It is entirely unknown as to whether this offends Islamic sensibilities 
to the same heightened manner as the desecration of the Koran. It 
firstly requires drawing their attention towards a knowledge of its 
existence, before any determination of its effectiveness can be made:


- http://www.grapple369.com/memeBrain_files/authorgrapple369.png

Carnival {“A farewell to the flesh"}: Pillorying & Polymorphic Christ 
(Pillorying and Atonement in Jewish culture) @ 9:41:50 AM 25 January 2012
Image: 1996 Surreal painting (self portrait) Pillorying & polymorphic 
crucifixion of Christ by (SOS) Sebastian Oscar Strensen

“Those who attacked the Diggers’ graves are clearly of the same ilk and 
are obviously wish to resist the beckoning call of civilisation. 
Remember when they hung that offensive Piss Christ photo at the National 
Gallery? It was an image of a plastic crucifix immersed in the urine of 
its gutless creator, Andres Serrano. The Catholic Archbishop of 
Melbourne George Pell sought a Supreme Court injunction to prevent the 
picture going on display. That failed, and Pell unhappily accepted the 
umpire’s verdict.

In Melbourne, two young blokes hit the picture with a hammer and, later, 
it was torn from the wall. Pell condemned the attackers. Of course it 
was grossly offensive to Christians, but they didn’t set out to kill 
Serrano, nor did he need to go in to hiding. It goes without saying that 
Serrano didn’t have the courage to do something similar to an image of 
Mohammad. I wonder what might have been the reaction of Australia’s 
rightly insulted Muslims.” [Some ungrateful Libyan Muslims desecrate our 
history, By Alan Howe, Herald Sun 5 March 2012]

I joked with him about what would likely to have happened yesterday and 
whether I would have been involuntarily sectioned, if they had known, 
that my singular intention was to effect a disdainful brutalisation of 
them by the slaughter of the nuns who own the shop--And I proudly 
expressed the view of its anticipated effectiveness, in being for them 
an especially enhanced and grievous reality by virtue of the fact that 
the Catholic nuns live within a worldview as delusional claim to 
superiority, where they mistakenly believe there is no verity and surety 
greater to their own belief. As they simply have no awareness of 
something much greater than them. It therefore has the very real 
capability of manifesting a most pronounced distress as uncontrolled 
anxieties and palpitations. A loss of bodily function and breathing 
control, an incapacity of speech and most probably resulting in death, 
as my intentioned act of a most discomforting awareness of a loss of 
soul. A judgement and revenge made against them. What do you think is 
implied by the claim that I would effect a collapse and forfeiture by 
the Catholic Religious Order, who have no remaining legitimacy within 
Australian life?

I described to him, my well intentioned purpose, which I conveyed before 
even beginning the 3 hrs of pleading my own cause of liberty with the 
psychiatrists yesterday. I had sought to protect them (purposefully left 
in draft disposition in that specific regard) in relation to the 
mechanics of the document. And described it’s capability for manifesting 
trauma as notionally equivalent to getting on the cross with Jesus. And 
explained to them that whilst no harm was being intentioned towards 
them. That should their sensibilities be moved to an empathy with my 
representations, they should clearly convey their free accept of it. The 
course of my presentation, would then focus on how the methodology, as 
recourse to the habitual use of obstructions, which move one towards the 
concealment of any intentioned process and instead having a reliance 
upon scurrilous distortions of any immediacy and capability for threat 
for actuality, has a mitigating effect on the permissibility of 
authority under the legislation.

At one point I brought to their attention, the expressed need to avoid 
the risky action of reading and consuming the document at too rapid and 
careless rate. As you may unnecessarily enter into a painful anxious 
state of fear which rendered them incapable of speech. That I was 
responding to the outstanding matter of psychiatrist Peter Sternhell’s 
slanderous characterisations of the substantial reality, vital 
effectiveness and the substance of my own religious belief. The 
improper, immodest and blasphemous characterisation by them, as being 
irrational and delusional was often repeated without substantiation by 
Dr. Meredith Stone (and I have seen her with child). To whom I have also 
intentioned to effect a similar retaliation against those persons, as a 
consequence to their slanderous, false and haughty characterisations of 
me and my belief as delusional and as cause for their sado-masochistic 
perversity to which I was then subject to their pleasure and the 
pretence as beneficial claim of a therapeutic process. In having 
furnished statements and these documents, in substantiation of my legal 
entitlements and claim against Saint Vincent’s Hospital, theirs 
similarly, is now a requirement as an accord with immediacy and a 
priority towards an unequivocal awareness, of their obligation which is 
without any further grounds for delay, as a requirement for them to 
provide an accountability for their actions and in their absence any 
credibility as lawful criteria to provide an apology and restitution for 
their past and continuing persecutions. And they will afford me an 
appropriate and sovereign dignity in the acknowledgement of the 
superiority and correctness of my substantial claim to Christian belief 
and over that which was previously claimed of Roman Catholic belief.

That until they all expire, every remaining Roman Catholic, from this 
time forward will afford to me an appropriate dignity as my entitlement 
which is attained by the sovereign basis of my substantiated claim to 
Christian belief and identity--such recognition of my superiority over 
the Roman Catholic Church and its fraudulent claims to Christian 
identity is to be accompanied by an appropriate gesturing as bowing in 
respect of my dignity and a verbalisation which acknowledges the majesty 
of my triumphantism over you all.

"Stop bitching. Put in a complaint to HREOC based on lunacy/disability, 
preferential Xment for Gooks.” [Shane Dowling alias Kangaroo Court 
Australia @ illusionz.admin@gmail.com]

You aren't worth quoting any further. The Human Rights and Equal 
Opportunity Commission have not dealt honestly with the complaints.

"My advice is EVERYONE agree what a loonie toonie yer are, yippity 
yippider, thats all folks!" [Shane Dowling alias Kangaroo Court 
Australia @ illusionz.admin@gmail.com]

Such gibber is pathetic: Is it possible that you enter into some realism 
as coherence in concordance towards unity of being and complete a sentence?

And in the circumstance where there is a claim as deposition of the 
Sovereign Autonomy (the Monarchy) made in relation to being Christian as 
Religious Identity and their usage of marriage as the transformative 
prototype and binary apparatus which is overthrown by a ternary number 
paradigm as justifications for Gay and Lesbian Marriage.

There is then the question above that of treason--as the theory proposed 
that they have in the circumstance: NO IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION AND NO 
PROTECTION AGAINST THE DISCLOSURE OF WHAT WAS HERETOFORE PRIVATE 
DISCUSSIONS AS ORGANISATIONAL DELIBERATIONS.

That my religious sensibilities have a priority as sovereign prerogative 
that is above your own, which will cease and that you recognise and 
acknowledge I possess an unprecedented authority under the Commonwealth, 
to use whatever effective force to not only terminate any presumptuous, 
arrogant and fascist abuses of my privileged belief, but to bring such 
malevolence into compliance.

I do intend to advertise for appropriate legal services--because I don't 
wish to have my actions as lawful opportunities prejudiced any further. 
I have at 0930 hrs this morning on 7 March 2012 sought legal advice in 
my matters by making contact with a legal firm Maurice Blackburn & co--I 
only sought that advice after first touching and saying a prayer at the 
Sydney memorial to the Christian Gathering in 1788. However they have 
not responded in a sufficient timeframe--and the offer is extended to 
which ever law firm, possessing such necessary skills and being apprised 
of my public statements about those matters, makes contact with me on my 
mobile phone to establish an appointment.

And again at 1335 hours on 7 March 2012 I attended at the offices of 
Slater & Gordon lawyers with the view of making an appointment and was 
told by the receptionist, that it could be made only via a telephone 
enquiry. I think that such legal firms actively discriminate against HIV 
infected persons. And I have raised that observation in relation to 
their pursuit of Mesothelioma claims. And indeed I had some disparaging 
haughty female lawyer attempt to disavow my use of the term 
"interrogation" to describe the perverse conduct of Saint Vincent’s 
medical staff.

I was ushered into a meeting room by her and she attempted to connect me 
via a phone there--however it appeared to me that this was just 
theatrics and the line was silent, and so I indicated my willingness to 
return home and make the call from there. I remarked about this rouse to 
a lady on my out of the building, how uncivil I found this whole process 
as they allowed no member of the public (as being too common, naive and 
perverse) to come to their door.

That’s two law firms eliminated.

What is it about honest weights in justice and a ternary conception of 
Number that is so difficult for you? Mens Rea!

I thereby have by such submission, a special Parliamentary Prerogative, 
in having contributed my work in progress as notes of my complex system 
of philosophical / theological belief to a Senate Committee Enquiry.

That the Church then, it's Institutions and people have in unrestrained 
prejudiced conduct directed towards me, perpetuated by such voluntary 
act and a determined will against the parliament, all Law and Authority 
of the Sovereign Crown of the Commonwealth of Australia.

And given an awareness of the consequence which have been my judgements, 
there is a compulsion placed upon Cardinal George Pell should he return 
to and retain sufficient bodily strength. If not he, then another who 
shall bear it in his stead. For him to proffer a confession over their 
transgressions as prejudiced sins committed against me and to make an 
appropriate restitution by the provision of Saint Vincent’s Hospital’s 
forfeited property holdings, as the bestowal of a compensation for the 
egregious abuses committed toward me by the Roman Catholic Church, it’s 
remaining institutions and people--and the pervasive agreement amongst 
Australians who expressed an apathy for change.

And if all others are too terrified, their past impertinence now 
rendered impotent of speech, then hear such an apology from the Pope 
this very day.

And if this action of mine is effectual in it’s undertaking (ie. 
breath-taking), then there is no doubt as to the lack of truth in the 
slanderous portrayal of my faith in God and his kind acts as watch care 
of my soul, as somehow constituting a delusional belief (no-one had ever 
given me praise, but only scorn for such belief) as the determined 
wicked desire by others to dispossess me of mind, being and soul and any 
hope for eternity. That such belief, indeed not only has substance, but 
is capable of purposeful and directed action. Others who have 
outstanding matters as failed obligations and duty towards me, will 
certainly now be moved to act on those and to bring them to 
resolution--why did I need to ask more than the once. Had there been by 
others, even a modicum of public recognition as appreciation of my 
work--I would not have had to resort to the laying aside of my pacifist 
values and its regard of life. So as to bring sufficient action against 
your indifference, to grab your attention as to the need to fulfil your 
failed obligations. And to remind you about what you had forgotten and 
had no remaining intention or concern for. That such action is not sport 
as an enjoyable pursuit. But it was a most arduous thing, I have ever 
done. And mandated entirely by your own evil towards me with a creeping 
consequence which was no different, other than my capacity to be patient 
for a day of retribution against you.

In the circumstance of Cardinal George Pell’s committed grievous sin 
with no opportunity for grace, I stood alone as the non-Catholic with 
others who were, to endure their same scorn, and then waited over 10 
years, and heard not one voice from any other person who cared enough to 
plead their cause as I have done, all that time as their faithful 
brother who fought for them with God by my side and won it 
overwhelmingly, when they were not capable of doing so for themselves. 
And in that respect, no one is capable of condemning me for the actions 
I have taken because of your failure and unwillingness to act.

17:09 (CST) hrs on 29 February 2012 @ WASHINGTON, D.C. (Reuters) - A 
lesbian woman from the nation's capital wants a Catholic priest relieved 
of his duties after he denied her communion at her mother's Maryland 
funeral because she lives with another woman, she said on Wednesday.

The local archdiocese has apologized for the actions of Father Marcel 
Guarnizo, but Barbara Johnson, who is gay and lives with her lesbian 
partner, said that was not enough.

Guarnizo officiated at a funeral mass for Loetta Johnson on Saturday at 
Saint John Neumann Catholic Church in Gaithersburg, about 25 miles 
northwest of Washington. He told attendees that only church members in a 
"state of grace" would be allowed to receive communion, Johnson said.

Johnson said that when she approached, the priest covered the communion 
chalice with his hand, "looked me in the eye and said 'I cannot give you 
communion because you live with a woman.'"

The priest told her "in the eyes of the church, that is a sin," she 
said. She and her family told the Archdiocese of Washington, which has 
issued an apology.

Catholic church teachings condemn homosexuality, and the church 
considers homosexual acts to be sinful. But the Archdiocese said in a 
statement that questions about a person's right to receive communion 
should be addressed privately and it was not policy to "publicly 
reprimand" worshipers.

The Archdiocese would not comment on Guarnizo's status, citing the 
matter as a personnel issue. Johnson said she does not want to focus on 
the incident as a gay-rights issue but wants the priest to stop doing 
pastoral work for the way he handled her mother's service.

"We're urging the church to make that decision, so that this doesn't 
happen to anyone else, to any other families," Johnson said. "It's the 
right thing to do."

"I think everyone has their gifts, and my family believes performing the 
responsibilities of a parish priest does not fall under his list of 
gifts," she added. [Gay woman wants priest relieved of duties after 
communion, Joe Danielewicz, © 2012 Reuters]

Mason Barge (masonbarge@gmail.com): “It's a comment on human nature, and 
especially people posting on the Usenet, that so many non-Catholic 
people should even have an op[i]nion about the people to whom the 
Catholic Church gives communion, much less think their opinion is 
important enough to share with others.”

Joan in GB-W: (jjkreus@aol.com): “It's a comment on human nature, and 
especially men posting on the Usenet, that so many women should even 
have an opinion about their sexuality and contraception. Let Rush lead 
them into battle and forgive all of the partners of these young sinning 
women. Gasp, and some of them might be or might eventually be your 
daughters.”

Bill Steele (ws21@cornell.edu): “It's a comment on human nature that so 
many people posting on Usenet believe what they have to say is so 
desperately important that they must cross-post it to irrelevant groups.”

Sword of Baal (ramrod@truthonly.com): “Oh yes and that URL does not have 
anything like that junk quotes above. Want to try 
again.................... ”

Cedro Wooley (cedro.wooly@olympia-tumwater.org): “Of course it does. It 
supports every example I gave in my post. You being a verified dick 
sucking ass fucked homosexual would never admit that though.”

Sword of Baal (ramrod@truthonly.com): “Okay, but, with your permission, 
I want to again try to disprove what I know are facts.”

Sbalneav (sbalneav@alburg.net): “Here's what [we’re] talking about.

Proof implies an absolute certainty that reality never can provide. This 
comes from it's alternative usage in the mathematical field, where one 
proves things. These mathematical proofs are absolutes. The problem is, 
proof has multiple meanings. It can mean "evidence establishing a fact", 
or it can mean "A logical or mathematical formal argument that shows how 
conclusions can be drawn from premises". Or, more simply, one is based 
on things in the real world, and the other is an intellectual exercise.

Theists often either ask "What proof do you have that God doesn't 
exist?" or say "I have proof that God exists.". In the first case, 
they're using proof in the "evidence" sense; do you have evidence that 
God doesn't exist? Of course, we all know that it's impossible to 
provide positive evidence for something not existing. We infer it's 
non-existence from the lack of evidence that we would expect to be 
there. There's no positive evidence for unicorns not existing, there's a 
LACK of evidence that we'd expect if unicorns did exist; no unicorn 
skeletons found, no reliable eyewitness accounts of unicorns, etc. When, 
of course, we cannot PROVIDE positive evidence that a God exists, they 
shout "AHA! So if you cannot PROVE he doesn't exist, then he COULD exist!"

When theists use the SECOND form ("I have proof...") they typically 
present something that's less about evidence, and more about some kind 
of mathematical or logical proof of God's existence. They'll give you 
the Kalam argument, or an ontological argument, or a "Maximally Good" 
argument, or something. When we say, "Yes, but that doesn't mean God 
*actually* exists", they shout "But my proof is ironclad! It's logically 
correct! It MUST be true!"

In the first case, they want evidence from us. And if we say "Where's 
YOUR proof God exists?", what WE mean is evidence. In the second case, 
they bait and switch evidence for a logical or intellectual argument. In 
both cases, they use the word "proof", but it changes it's focus from 
evidence to logical correctness.

So my point is; let's actually say what we mean. If what we need is 
evidence that will compel us to accept that a position is true, then we 
should ASK for evidence. Don't ask for "proof", or when they give you 
Godel's ontological argument, you get sucked in to arguing math and logic.

Using the Bible, Quran, and Talmud as examples, each of them makes 
predictions that are TESTABLE in the real world. And by *testable*, we 
mean things that either would have left *evidence* that we can find 
(Global Flood), or can be tested today and should leave evidence (ask 
and thou shalt receive).

And as for [the] assertion that Science actually proves thi[n]gs, that's 
just nonsense. I provided him with two separate links from .edu domains, 
and invited him to talk to any university professor or, heck, go and 
grab a book on the scientific method from a library. He, of course, 
flatly refused.”

Cedro Wooley (cedro.wooly@olympia-tumwater.org): “Have [a go] at it, 
kangaroo boy.”

dolf: “22 / 7 = You are a lying cunt {an unpleasant or stupid person}.

Years ago, a mathematical prototype (as someone else’s intellectual 
property) comprising the initial four dialectic magic square strata to 
the Grapple noumenon reality as alternative to the church’s own 
historical use of the celestial hierarchy was personally served on the 
Melbourne, Victoria (Australia) arch-diocese of the Roman Catholic Church.

How then are the Catholic Church of Victoria at War on Same Sex Unions?”

Sword of Baal (ramrod@truthonly.com): “That goes to show what a low bred 
uneducated idiot we are dealing with here.”

Cedro Wooley (cedro.wooly@olympia-tumwater.org): “Yes, you are correct 
in your conclusion that my post shows, ‘…what a low bred uneducated 
idiot we are dealing with here.’ What else could be said for people who 
knowingly and willfully spread a deadly disease simply to satisfy the 
sexual promiscuity.”

Fidem Turbare (the non-existent atheist goddess): “Your understanding of 
basic anatomy is clearly incorrect, for the opening at the lower end of 
the alimentary canal in most species is insufficient for purposes of any 
level of intellectual discourse.”

Cedro Wooley (cedro.wooly@olympia-tumwater.org): “Except when the bearer 
is a male homosexual then it can speak, shout, send smoke signals, and 
sign. However, its vocabulary is limited to two words, ‘FUCK ME.’”

dolf: “Hey Mr. Jingoist Kangaroo weren't you in Wake in Fright, how's it 
hanging?”

Sword of Baal (ramrod@truthonly.com): “Crap and lies cut[.] O[h] M[y] 
G[od] there is nothing left !!!!!!!!!!!!”

Cedro Wooley (cedro.wooly@olympia-tumwater.org): "Flatulence and asshole?”

dolf: "Skunk and Pisswacker mate! Did I ever tell you about the time I’d 
given Sophie Mirabella (née Panopoulos), as the Honorable Member for 
Indi, a nominal sum of $200 plus GST just so I could get access to the 
Federal Attorney-General Phillip Ruddock, who spoke at a Collins Street, 
Melbourne venue on Islamic extremists?

I mentioned to him my Grapple paradigm as informal research work in 
progress on a noumenal reality and the belief that the circumstance of 
public holidays (Australia Day, ANZAC Day, Armistice Day) emitted a 
certain state of consciousness as character upon the Australian populace.

I had slipped a couple $50 to assist in their auctioning bid for a 
bottle of wine against Liberal stalwart John Elliot and with whom I 
later discussed the opulent marble facade and rare timber paneling which 
existed in the Port Authority building, where I then had an apartment.

Money apparently buys access to the Liberal Party, but it was a 
legitimate fund raiser amongst Party members.”

When is Cardinal George Pell going to begin his public repentance 
against the prejudiced conduct directed towards me, perpetuated by such 
voluntary act and a determined will against the parliament, all Law and 
Authority of the Sovereign Crown of the Commonwealth of Australia?

My 27 November 2005 Rainbow Sash comments made on the public boundary 
outside the Saint Patrick's Roman Catholic Church situated at 
Maffra-Briagolong Road, Briagolong weren’t reported in the press either. 
Such protest was made against the Roman Catholic Church's similar lack 
of regard for religious belief as an autonomous and sovereign Natural 
Law, Common Law and Constitutional human right: “The Australian Catholic 
Church appears to be advocating present day religious, political, 
organizational and social values that on matters of sexuality and 
seventh-day Sabbatarian Everlasting Covenant have not come to repentance 
on the denial of Autonomous, Sovereign, Common Law and Constitutional 
Rights of others.

Your claim to religious belief is by any objective measure intrinsically 
morally disordered.”

Rule of Life (jjbruce@gmail.com): “It[‘]s bongs out back of parli[am]ent
It[‘]s needles and hero[i]n in the [Q]ueen[‘]s palace
It[‘]s a[mph]etamines round the world
There was no-one else, dehon[ou]r and treason: At Her Majesty's Service

The Crown will kill all homosexuals
The Crown has acted out of order in allowing a gay race.
I hold the right, Him Her
It should be known that the world revolves around two people
At anyone time male and female: The Influence

There was no word in the stars to describe gay and homosexual
And could not be used on Crown Notices

It is against the law to use the word homosexual except here in.
Homosexual is against the law.

It is against the law to question: The Crown--God

The one the girls sing about--You”

dolf: “Wasn’t the Pope recently asked on: ‘Creationists need [for a] 
Catholic vision’?”

BroilJAB (DesignDenier@wmconnect.com): “Lets hope the Holy Pontiff sets 
many creationists back on the right path.”

Vurgil (Vurgil@arg.erg): “It would be a great improvement.”

dolf: “He knows Greedy!”

BroilJAB (DesignDenier@wmconnect.com): “From what I understand.”

Vurgil (Vurgil@arg.erg): “Which is nothing!”

dolf: “Is it painful?”

A letter of an outstanding legal claim was peacefully hand delivered to 
St Vincent's Hospital on 3 March 2012 and following which a Rainbow Sash 
was worn in a parade through the streets to advise all peoples of this 
unequivocal association of claimed and substantiated Christian idealism 
and Gay identity now being inseparable from the Commonwealth of 
Australia's claim and advancement of ANZAC identity and idealism from 
which such persons, by their continued antagonism towards the sovereign 
autonomy of this nation--Are excluded.

That hell is now the destiny for all of you, who are similarly 
indifferent to your obligation and duty towards others!

- dolf
- www.grapple369.com/memeBrain.html

"dolf" <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
news:uoGdnclgA-5ldOnSnZ2dnUVZ5sadnZ2d@giganews.com...
> On 30/03/12 9:44 AM, Barry OGrady wrote:
>> Now that's an unsound mind!
>>
>
> I've heard recently that Sydney radio shock jock, Karl Sandilands is 
> suffering from shrinking testicles. You ain't seen nothing until you've 
> had some fat queen sado-masochistic faggot actor as a gym junkie from 
> Sydney going troppo at being called a plump frump.
>
> Does your dictionary make haughty a lawful alternative to skanking whore, 
> or self conceit a synonym for your shit?
>
> Brad (bradvk2qq@gmail.com): "W[hat] T[he] F[uck] are you talking about?"
>
> atec77 (atec77@hotmail.com): "No one know[s] or cares. It is after all 
> just dork talk!"
>
> dolf: "Karl you're a chook."
>
> Ish (m@g.net): "I thought so. What's the matter? Afraid of women?"
>
> Denis / Ish (denis.mattg@yahoo.de / ish.mattg@yahoo.de): "Is exactly what 
> I am"
>
> Ish (xm@c.net): "You can't consider a faggot like you a 'woman'.
>
> Is it really beyond you to believe a woman can like baseball and not 
> necessarily want to read about your obsessions in a baseball group? 
> Chauvinist!".
>
> denis (mrwilson6982@yahoo.de): "You can't consider a faggot tranny like 
> you a 'woman'."
>
> dolf: "There's only one queen and that's Madonna bitch."
>
> Ishtar (ishtarnec@gmail.com): "Fucking frog. Awful funny you show up when 
> the trolls do."
>
> dolf: "Qu'est-ce? Aren't you just the trolley dolly from the women's 
> hospital." [B-Day Song (feature M.I.A) Madonna MDNA ? 2012 Boy Toy Inc.]
>
> What is a Nation? (Qu'est-ce qu'une nation?) is a 1882 essay by French 
> historian Ernst Renan (1823-1892), known for the statements that a nation 
> is "a daily referendum", and that nations are based as much on what the 
> people jointly forget, as what they remember. It is frequently quoted or 
> anthologized in works of history or political science pertaining to 
> nationalism. [Wikipedia 2012: Qu'est-ce?]
>
> M (storm@c.net): "What is this doing in a baseball group? Nobody here 
> gives a damn for your opinions, even that Rosecomm idiot plonked you. Too 
> bad...he might have said 'Pete Rose belongs in the Hall of Fame playing 
> with homosexual-sex-obsessed dee-nis's pecker.' Now THAT would be an 
> appropriate job for him."
>
> Barry OGrady (atheist@hotmail.com.au): "You don't understand yourself at 
> all. You think it clever not to punctuate. What are trying to prove?
>
> You probably think its cool to wear a baseball cap on backwards. You 
> conform to what you think is non conforming."
>
> dolf: "That Catholic bitch apologist Kristina Keneally is dismissing the 
> fact that religious unbelief and disbelief which are your matters of 
> conscious as indulgence and belief is also someone else's human rights 
> claim which you are diminishing--Keep silent you skanking whore because I 
> am speaking in judgement against your soul.
>
> Your fucked up Catholic Religious belief gives you, as an American 
> refugee, the right to Australian Citizenship and political party 
> privilege--But not Me!
>
> I accuse you of indifference. Stop buying your meat pies from Tony Abbott, 
> you are no longer welcome."
>
> Old Jinglebollocks (old.jinglebollocks@gmail.com): "Doesn't matter any 
> more.
>
> Can't be bothered even to read what you bums are writing on usenet.
>
> Fuck ye, the whole damned lot o' ye."
>
> I thought Jamie Rowe was discriminatory in the manner by which he 
> undertook his seeking of housemates in Liverpool Street with Gay 
> Share-space was indulgently disrespectful of the person's dignity as 
> autonomic right. That collectively these radio personalities are by their 
> fascist dog commentary, not mindful of duty to State. I also called the 
> Chief Commissioner office with that same calmness of mind--it is therefore 
> dishonest to convey it as otherwise.
>
> Defence Minister Stephen Swan in addressing the media on 7 March 2012, 
> over ADF shenanigans does raise some matters of parallelism and I do note 
> as advice in which I agree.
>
> On 13 March 2012 I followed my community health nurse and confidant's 
> recent example of determined conduct as a statement of dissatisfaction 
> made in resignation and contempt over the unlawful character and the 
> frenzied, brutalising, hate filled manner by which the New South Wales 
> Police Service and Saint Vincent's Acute Care Team have conducted 
> themselves in my affairs.
>
> Following their advice that these persons were seeking to make a 
> submission to a Magistrate's Court in order to forcibly gain entry into my 
> apartment and access me as to the nature, condition and circumstances of 
> my psychological health--they again resorted to unlawful, threatening and 
> unbridled aggression in their conduct outside my premises and a week later 
> they murdered a Brazilian youth (certainly not a Brazil Holland hero) by 
> tasering him in a circumstance of mistaken identity over an alleged theft 
> of biscuits (a wafer perhaps?).
>
> This was now the 3rd occasion where this intrusion against me had occurred 
> and which I viewed as an unwanted, unreasoned and aggressive conduct 
> against my autonomy and rights under the State as a person of intellect, 
> integrity and dignity who is generally of a calm and happy disposition. 
> This conduct by them has unnecessarily tainted, prejudiced and rendered 
> toxic my living environment--goodness knows what monstrosity the 
> neighbours think of me.
>
> These grievous incursions by State Authorities who have no desire to give 
> any accountability for their actions and neither do they wish to grant me 
> a modicum of credence with respects to my religious belief as being a 
> substantial reality. Accordingly, I have left both Sydney and the State of 
> New South Wales with no intention of ever returning to their culture of 
> disrespect, which lacks civility in its inhumanity. I have therefore 
> terminated my lease and left 3rd parties to pack and convey my goods and 
> chattels interstate at a cost of over $4,000. Given this my book has now 
> reached a level of completeness. I believe that such actions by me as 
> public defiance of the State's conduct which I have taken with due 
> consideration as a calculated exercise of voluntary will accompanying 
> determined action against them, will invariably manifest a disturbing 
> effect and consequence upon their enjoyment as participation in any 
> further ANZAC celebrations.
>
> As I crossed the State border into Victoria as a safer haven from their 
> persecutions and traumatising conduct, I advised those parties of my 
> intention to leave the State.
>
> This departure gave me an opportunity to meet a female friend of Private 
> Jake Kovco who had some life experiences which augmented mine. There was 
> no disagreement about the plausibility of any aspect about my belief that 
> Kovco's conduct was deliberate and being passed off as accidental. His 
> making of a video record of his service was in itself an unusual act. I 
> formed the view from the sloppy and casual manner by which he portrayed 
> himself that it seemed different to how other soldiers are normally 
> portrayed in the media.
>
> The casualness as his routine conduct was at odds with his disruption of 
> determined policy events. That the uncharacteristic behaviour about his 
> making of the video record seems to support the notion as a view he held, 
> that the Australian soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan were forgotten by the 
> general populace, who went about their lives as though they weren't there 
> and what they were doing wasn't important. He was in fact undertaking a 
> course of action which required complex processes that were not normal for 
> him. That his intention to have his body return on ANZAC day was a 
> dishonourable and opportunistic conduct as an attempt to impose himself 
> upon the State in a most undignified manner.
>
> That I was right to protest as I had done and what a waste of time and 
> money the Military Tribunals into his death were.
>
> Also conveyed to me was an equivalent experience to my own, about private 
> sexual acts being recorded by others and unbeknownst to ourselves, were 
> then publicised amongst a group in an attempt to dishonour a person's 
> dignity and privacy--That this was technically a rape because the sexual 
> act accompanied a video recording which was made against a person's will.
>
> Have you met my kangaroo Jingoist bitch prostitute: Shane Dowling?
>
> "We know what you mean by Faceless Men, Krudd, you anti-termite, errrrhm 
> semite.....Coz Mark Arsebib, is just an ass-licker." [7 March 2012, Shane 
> Dowling alias Kangaroo Court Australia @ illusionz.admin@gmail.com]
>
> The dolt defamation on the Internet is going to come to an end!
>
> "[With opposition] 101 [asks "Does the Zionist Lobby have blood on its 
> hands in Australia?"] [7 March 2012, Shane Dowling alias Kangaroo Court 
> Australia @ illusionz.admin@gmail.com]
>
> Semantics!
>
> In this regard, at about 1840 hours on 19 February 2012, I had two 
> uniformed police from Kings Cross, namely Constable Peter Mullans and 
> Constable Alex Dews attended at my home address with two plain clothes 
> persons. A female who identified as Cherie Jenkins and another male person 
> who showed a reluctance to divulge his name as David Manley.
>
> There was a reluctant and obscuring conduct by David Manley as a refusal 
> to convey to me his identity in my own home. This antagonism towards me 
> within my own home, demonstrated to me that there was here a committed and 
> determined agenda of which I was not being fully informed of.
>
> I asked him upon what evidence as the grounds are they now reliant to 
> substantiate the claim that my conduct of 16 February 2012 constituted a 
> psychotic behaviour needing intervention as Dr Mark Bloch also improperly 
> asserted on that occasion.
>
> I denied that my conduct was in any way aggressive and I produced to those 
> persons a medical record made by Dr. Diane Williams following my 
> attendance at the Sydney Hospital on 18 February 2012 following a 
> pedestrian/motor vehicle accident earlier that day which recorded the 
> following observations: "Calm and cooperative, answering questions 
> appropriately, alert and oriented."
>
> As a consequence of David Manley's brief but uninformed statements about 
> my swollen left ankle which was injured by the car accident on 18 February 
> 2012, I at my earliest convenience the next day at 8:00am, again attended 
> at the Sydney Hospital with the view of obtaining x-rays and there was no 
> evidence of acute fracture and a simple analgesia as paracetamol/ibuprofen 
> was recommended.
>
> I also refused their request to further assessment as unnecessary as I 
> have full private medical insurance have an implied freedom to choose my 
> own doctor. I advised that I was under the regular care of a doctor for 
> which there existed a treatment plan and that my next appointment was 
> scheduled for the 28 February 2012 whereupon I was expectant to have my 
> stitches removed from my head.
>
> Determining Consciousness and Cognitive Intent as Implied by Human Speech
> I asked them if they wished to take a look at the current focus of my 
> informal research activity involving making a determination of 
> consciousness and cognitive intent which is implied by human speech. 
> However they declined this offer on the grounds that they were not 
> psychiatrists and therefore not equipped to examine any paradigms of mind. 
> As there were no continuing grounds for their involvement they left and I 
> then illustrated the feasibility of obtaining an idea of cognition and 
> conscious intent from narrative by memeBraining the statement I had made 
> to Constable Mullans previously:
>
> "11 March 2012
>
> Dear Steve Jobs,
>
> I know that the iPhone 4S contract with Telstra, Sydney Australia was 
> entered into on 14 October 2011 being some matter of days after your death 
> 5 October 2011--were you buried by then?
>
> Today I went to the Apple Store and Telstra Store in Sydney and lamented 
> how the screen which was now cracked, and unable to keep up with the 
> rigours my life demanded.
>
> Of necessity on 18 February 2012, as the police statement of the day 
> conveys. I as a pedestrian faced with a driver determined and no intent to 
> stop, despite my motioning to so do. Found recourse, as an act of self 
> preservation, in grappling the bonnet of the moving vehicle.
>
> It took me 200 metres down the street of Darlinghurst Rd, Bayswater Rd 
> Kings Cross before I got off the car--he never stopped to let me though.
>
> The iPhone (it may have been in my rear pocket or it could have been in my 
> hand) didn't leave my presence of being--I wanted to know what guarantee 
> of warranty I had hereafter.
>
> I feel let down today by those who represented you and I am inclined by an 
> economic prospect of terminating the contract with the telecommunications 
> supplier as a more sensible thing to do--rather than getting a new iPhone.
>
> I'll put you in a box, which I still kept from the day of the sale.
>
> And go with your competitor."
>
> I recently said to Sergeant Kate Baker of the NSW Police that with all due 
> respect I was a brevet Sergeant of Police at 24 years of age. And that the 
> name dolf had been adopted (as an identity because of legislative changes 
> which allowed name changes on the birth certificate) whilst a member of 
> the police service within the computer services division--it was published 
> as such in the Police Gazette.
>
> I was the person who introduced the first six micro-computers into the 
> Victoria Police Service. That specialist areas such as the homicide squad, 
> were able to obtain any computing resources as their first computer, was 
> in some part due to ability by me to withstand any organisational 
> antagonism to the contrary.
>
> And the same goes for Victoria's Bureau of Criminal Intelligence as their 
> first network implemented by a Detective Geoff Woodrow (where is that man 
> these days?)--he deployed the DOS based application KnowledgeMan (Micro 
> Data Base Systems: mdbs) at my recommendation and I was most proud of his 
> abilities.
>
> That my present-day research into the existence of a noumenal reality (the 
> uncut block of Daoism or Celestial Hierarchy of Western governance and 
> religious belief) which was first surmised by Immanuel Kant. Actually has 
> its grounding in my former police service and interest in mdbs' other 
> product Guru as the bigger brother to the Knowledgeman application and 
> that being the notion of attributed time associated to consciousness, the 
> metaphysical origins of language having a cosmological basis as grounding 
> in the instance of time as rational PI (22nd Priestly service of GAMUL (a 
> recompense; camel) / 7 days of the week @ Equinoctial on Wednesday 20 
> March 1996 / New Moon Thursday 21 March 1996) / ENNEAD, and of a desire to 
> do further investigations into memeBraining a recent Statement of a 
> Witness document into Incident: E47210203 which was made to a Constable 
> Mullans of the NSW Police on 18 February 2012.
>
> I illustrated the feasibility of memeBraining the statement to get some 
> idea of cognition and conscious intent to Constable Mullans on the 
> following day when he further attended at my home address at 6:40pm.
>
> The view being, that it ought to have some relevance to the narrative 
> itself. Which he was at pains to ensure was not led by himself, but 
> articulated by me at his facilitation. And from there we ought to obtain a 
> very rich set of categories from which fuzzy logic tests can be made as 
> appraisals, to visualise the temporal areas where the steeping by osmosis 
> to inform the consciousness occurs within the time continuum and determine 
> whether it has any continuing empathy with the text of OATH (I swear by 
> Almighty God) being the Hebrew / Greek lexicon association by Strong's 
> Number to the actual Biblical Text.
>
> To this end, I have today purchased the following O'Reilly Publications:
>
> JavaScript Web Applications, (c) 2011 Alex MacCaw, JQuery Developer's 
> Guide to Moving State to the Client
> JavaScript, (c) 2011 David Flanagan, The Definitive Guide: Activate Your 
> Web Pages
>
> With the view of developing the memeBrain perspective by updating the 
> existing Grapple virtualisation cube prototype and functions to a 
> semantical equivalence as used by the JQuery Tool and to deploy it as a 
> layer to that architecture.
>
> And from a cursory read of JavaScript: The Definitive Guide, we can use 
> the enumeration() example to define our vMeme() as class object--this is 
> still work in progress, but none the less, the result of an enjoyable 
> afternoon:--
>
> /*
>     memeBrain:     Determining Consciousness and Cognitive Intent as 
> Implied by Human Speech
>     Author:        Dolf Leendert Boek
>
>     Revision:     2012.02.22
>
> */
>
> // Example 6-1: Creating a new object that inherits from a prototype
> // O'Reilly's Javascript The Definitive Guide 2011:119
>
> function inherit(p) {
>
>     switch (true) {
>     case (p == null):
>         return {'71#14': "Type Error"};
>         break;
>
>     case (Object.create):
>         return Object.create(p);
>         break;
>
>     }
>
>     try {
>         if (typeof(p) != "object")
>             throw {s: 71, e: 14}; // Type Error
>
>         function f() {};
>         f.prototype = p;
>         return new f();
>
>     } catch (err) {
>         switch(true) {
>         case (err.s == 71 && err.e == 14):
>             return {'71#14': "Type Error"};
>             break;
>
>         default:
>             return {'15#69': "Unknown Error"};
>             break;
>
>         }
>     }
> }
>
> // Example 9-7: Enumerated types in JavaScript
> // O'Reilly's Javascript The Definitive Guide 2011:217
>
> function createMeme(idea) {
>
>     // Dummy constructor
>
>     var createMeme = function() {};
>
>     // Enumerated values inherit from this object
>
>     var proto = createMeme.prototype = {
>         constructor: createMeme,
>         toString: function() { return this.name; },
>         valueOf: function() { return this.value; },
>         toJSON: function() { return this.value; }
>     };
>
>     // Set the enumerated value data objects
>
>     createMeme.$names = [];
>     createMeme.$error = [];
>     createMeme.chronos = {};
>     createMeme.supernal = {};
>     createMeme.ego = {};
>     createMeme.male = {};
>     createMeme.female = {};
>
>     // Now create the instances of this new type
>
>     for (item in idea) {
>
>         var e = inherit(proto);
>
>         switch (true) {
>         case (typeof(e['71#14']) != "undefined"):
>             createMeme.$error[createMeme.$error.length] = [e['71#14'], ': 
> ', item].join('');
>             break;
>
>         case (typeof(e['15#69']) != "undefined"):
>             createMeme.$error[createMeme.$error.length] = [e['15#69'], ': 
> ', item].join('');
>             break;
>
>         case (item == "chronos"):
>         case (item == "supernal"):
>         case (item == "ego"):
>             e.name = item;
>             e.value = idea[item];
>             createMeme[item] = e;
>             createMeme.$names[createMeme.$names.length] = item;
>             break;
>
>         case (item == "male"):
>         case (item == "female"):
>             e._name = item;
>             e.value = inherit(idea[item]);
>             createMeme[item] = e;
>             createMeme.$names[createMeme.$names.length] = item;
>             break;
>         }
>     }
>
>     // A class method for iterating the instances of the class
>
>     createMeme.foreach = function(f, c) {
>
>         for (var i = 0; i < this.$names.length; i++)
>             f.call(c, this[this.$names[i]]);
>
>     };
>
>     return createMeme;
> }
>
> var vMeme = createMeme({
>     chronos: null,
>     supernal: 342,
>     male: {
>         vBronze: 21,
>         vPurple: 26,
>         vRed: 42,
>         vBlue: 52,
>         vOrange: 57,
>         vGreen: 39,
>         vYellow: 68,
>         vCyan: 31,
>         vCoral: 6,
>     },
>     ego: 249,
>     female: {
>         vBronze: 21,
>         vPurple: 5,
>         vRed: 16,
>         vBlue: 10,
>         vOrange: 5,
>         vGreen: 63,
>         vYellow: 29,
>         vCyan: 44,
>         vCoral: 56
>     }
> });
>
>
> Additionally I had contact by telephone from a person named Greg who also 
> purported to be a nurse from St Vincent's Hospital--however as it was a 
> blocked number I conveyed to him such anonymous conduct really wasn't in 
> regard of me.
>
> He again made the false and mischievous characterisation of my conduct on 
> 16 February 2012 as being threatening of Dr Mark Bloch and therefore 
> substantial--which I categorically denied. I said that I had demanded Dr 
> Mark Bloch give substantiation of what aspects of writing he found 
> objectionable and that his conduct constituted slander.
>
> Once again he was making scurrilous and fictitious characterisations as 
> distortions that he was projecting at me as traumatising and vilifying 
> conduct which had no knowledge of the substantive reality to the 
> contrary--that I had delivered letters to Dr Mark Bloch requesting 
> evidence of the heretofore non-existent grounds for my initial arrest as 
> involuntary lodgement and that in the real absence of those grounds, I was 
> intent on pursuing legal action and that they were appraised of my 
> intentions as considered actions to contest the veracity as lack of 
> truthfulness inherent in Dr Mark Bloch's characterisations of me.
>
> This same nurse again attended at my home in the company of a doctor 
> (identity unknown) at approximately 1143 hrs on 22 February 2012. We had a 
> further discussion via the intercom. I asked them to cease besieging me 
> and especially at home. As there was no immediacy as the substantive and 
> necessary grounds for their intervention beyond the fictitious and 
> pretentious claims of threatening behaviour which they have kept making in 
> the knowledge that it is false, as I have now repeatedly denied it.
>
> Or are you wishing to now assail me in relation to other events as 
> unwarranted and undesired further disruption and interference in my 
> preparation of argumentation for other legal matters associated with the 
> preparation of my book (as evidence in support of those legal claims) and 
> research undertaken over the last 16 years?
>
> I have previously on 21 May 2008 sought a voluntary consultation with Dr 
> Peter Sternhell who was a psychiatrist at Saint Vincent's Hospital 
> following a referral from Dr Mark Bloch--I did so in order to determine 
> the appropriate course of legal action and priority to take in a number of 
> complex matters.
>
> Whilst the psychiatrist was capable of making agreeable notes about those 
> matters which I would simply expand--his was a lack of awareness of the 
> details about my participation in the Kovco fiasco. Beyond acknowledging 
> my activism as having marked me out in some way, the psychiatrist couldn't 
> understand why I would be involved in a rainbow sash protest against 
> Kovco's effeminate conduct and by the same rainbow sash worn in protests 
> over refusal of Communion perpetuated by Cardinal George Pell in 1998 and 
> 2000.
>
> And hence he then made irrational and dissonant associations as my implied 
> lack of lucid connectedness and the cause for a social disconnectedness 
> between myself and Kovco which he described by a fiction: "Part of this 
> related to the recent death of Private Jake Kovco who had lived in the 
> same area in the same time. Mr Kovco made references to past childhood 
> sexual abuse and Aaron saw this as impacting on him--Aaron did not know 
> him personally, but felt that his in some way, impacted on him."
>
> As my twin sister and I am now estranged over this issue as my ANZAC day 
> protest and her siding with Kovco's mother whom she knows personally is 
> the reason I will not even attend her funeral should she precede me.
>
> The psychiatrist acknowledges the complexity of my unusual belief system 
> and the degree to which it affects his life, and on this basis he 
> considered me as having a delusional disorder. That is, he holds a very 
> complex system of beliefs that other people do not (or refuse to) 
> understand and which tends to impinge adversely on much of his life due to 
> his preoccupation with it. It also reflects his continuing antipathy 
> towards organisational religion, particularly the Roman Catholic Church.
>
> Much of the antipathy, of course, has a justifiable basis, eg: homophobic 
> comments that are made in that it conflicts with the Church's official 
> teachings, a lack of clarity over holocaust denial, Pope Benedict's 
> obscurity over the 75th anniversary when the office of Holy See signed the 
> Concordant with the German Reich.
>
> "Aaron spent much of today's interview telling me about the dispute with 
> the insurance company and referred often to a very complex philosophical 
> and metaphysical system he had developed. It involves use of number, 
> numerology, elements of Jewish Kabbalah, use of the lunar calendar and the 
> original Julian calendar."
>
> "Due to the complexity of his ideas, I could not follow his reasoning. He 
> spoke at length about the dispute with the Insurer and described, in part, 
> a very complex philosophical and metaphysical system that he has developed 
> that involves numerology, ancient texts, and ancient Chinese political 
> treatise including the Dao Te Ching."
>
> It is clear then that the statements made by the hospital's psychiatrist 
> are faulty, in being a conflict of values in support of the employer as 
> organisational religious ethos which fails to give any substantiation to 
> its prejudiced statements with respects to homosexuality and their 
> substantiated claims to religious belief as Christian identity and that 
> any reliance upon them is only based on hysteria--The psychiatrist 
> acknowledges that the "discrimination against me occurs because he is 
> Dutch and that people who are married with a religious faith are 
> automatically against him because he is also gay and HIV-positive. He held 
> these beliefs with absolute conviction."
>
> I also hold with absolute conviction, that any evidence of a ritualised 
> act of marriage associated to Roman Catholic (and other Christian) 
> religious belief by person's who have subjected me to any refusal as 
> attendance to my requests for action and closure in outstanding legal 
> matters--is to be now considered the prima facie grounds for any 
> prejudiced conduct towards me. You are not any longer free men in a 
> democracy but now slaves.
>
> That the complexity of my unusual belief system is exaggerated by this 
> psychiatrist because it conveys a description of a ternary system of 
> number as an alternative to the binary (heteros) apparatus as the 
> philosophical/theological basis to the ecclesiastical practice of marriage 
> used by the Catholic Church. That if the psychiatrist himself is married 
> within a religious faith which includes the rite of communion, then he 
> subscribes to an equivalent complex system of belief and idea as the basis 
> of delusion is not foreign to him--as he claims.
>
> Furthermore this complexity of belief which he claims is beyond his 
> understanding is equally a paradigm of mind related to psychiatry (and the 
> field of activity of the person for whom I wrote my paradigm), Godhead and 
> Governance of State and Church as theory of number and metaphysical 
> origins of language--my model provides a substantiation of Christian 
> identity and its perceived categories of the noumenal reality as a 
> technology which is entirely embedded within the Biblical narrative.
>
> As such St Vincent's Hospital is a Roman Catholic Institution which is 
> operated by a religious order of nuns in accordance with its Catholic 
> values as a claim to a complex philosophical and theological belief system 
> and the basis for their claimed Christian identity. The psychiatrist is 
> therefore disingenuous and fallacious in his claim of my having a 
> delusional disorder on the basis of holding a belief and value system.
>
> He would have us believe that whilst he organisationally participates in a 
> normality, which subscribes to a complex system of philosophical / 
> theological belief that he feels no obligation to describe or to 
> substantiate his understanding of (excepting as a paradigm of mind) such 
> belief and yet when I subscribe to an equivalent complex system of 
> philosophical / theological belief, this alternative reality he describes 
> as an incomprehensibility and an abnormal human condition.
>
> My statement of fact, which you misinterpreted as a claim, is not in error 
> because it describes reality.
>
> The subject matter, beyond the scope of belief, is not significant and has 
> no impact on the concept of belief versus an absence of belief.
>
> Your attempt to manipulate the words brings further question into the 
> credibility of your claim because you are confirming that you are having 
> difficulty with simple clarity.
>
> Saint Vincent's Hospital is hereby advised that I make a claim as a 
> homosexual to a complex philosophical/theological system of belief, which 
> is a substantiated claim to Christian identity that is fully and 
> rationally articulated. And which is not the basis of a delusional 
> disorder as this psychiatrist has falsely claimed as the cause for the 
> continuation of a culture of persecution as dominant character of life 
> within Australia--As the essential culture of opposition which is the 
> Catholic Church, its Institutions and its people as parasite.
>
> Accordingly, this psychiatrist and Saint Vincent's hospital are to provide 
> an apology for its past persecutions and it's traumatising effect and 
> those prejudiced actions by Cardinal Pell which have been directed against 
> my religious belief as philosophical/theological claim to Christian 
> identity and by that belief, I assert a claim to a sovereignty of autonomy 
> as a prerogative which is above that being claimed by any member of the 
> Catholic Church as their indulgence of a tokenistic wafer, as no communion 
> ever again between us.
>
> Theo Bekkers: (theodoreb@bigpond.com.au): "So it has value for you because 
> you do/don't, sort-of-might believe. That sounds very valuable to me. I 
> don't have a position on the taste of Yak milk. I treasure that 
> non-position."
>
> Pnyikos (nyikos2@bellsouth.net): "Oh, wait, I overlooked the smiley. What 
> does it mean in this case?
>
> If it means, 'My, that was quite a *bon mot*, as well as being right on 
> target' then my analysis stands."
>
> dolf: "And the wafer didn't crumble, nor was it sloppy when it was shoved 
> up where the sun don't shine."
>
> Zen teachings can be likened to "the finger pointing at the moon". Zen 
> teachings point to the moon, awakening, the realization of the nature of 
> reality, which is devoid of independently existing "things". But the 
> Zen-tradition also warns against taking its teachings, the pointing 
> finger, to be this insight itself:
>
> Wujin Chang, a nun, asked the Sixth Zen patriarch, Hui Neng, for help in 
> understanding the Mahanirvana Sutra. The master answered that he could not 
> read, but if the nun would read it aloud for him, he would do his best to 
> help her. The nun then asked, "If you can't even read the words, how can 
> you understand the truth behind them?"
>
> "Truth and words are unrelated. Truth can be compared to the moon," 
> answered Hui Neng, pointing to the moon with his finger, "And words can be 
> compared to a finger. I can use my finger to point out the moon, but my 
> finger is not the moon, and you don't need my finger in order to be able 
> to see the moon".
>
> This warning against confusing the finger and the moon resembles the 
> Diamond-sutra: [E]very disciple who is seeking Anuttara-samyak sambhodi 
> should discard, not only conceptions of one's own selfhood, other selves, 
> living beings and a Universal Selfhood, but should discard, also, all 
> ideas about such conceptions and all ideas about the non-existence of such 
> conceptions. While the Tathagata, in his teaching, constantly makes use of 
> conceptions and ideas about them, disciples should keep in mind the 
> unreality of all such conceptions and ideas. [Wikipedia 2012: ZEN]
>
>
> That the Roman Catholic Church and especially the religious order which 
> operates, the Saint Vincent's Hospital cannot now make any substantiated 
> claim of Christian identity in the denial of my own belief and that they 
> are to cease making such misrepresented and false claims. Of course the 
> consequence of this will be a collapse of the religious order which owns 
> the hospital and all its property holdings will in due course to be 
> forfeited by the Church and provided in compensation to me for the 
> persecutions made by the Roman Catholic Church, its Institutions and its 
> people.
>
> Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: "Hi!"
>
> dolf: "How are you doing?"
>
> Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: "I'm good thanks. How are you?"
>
> dolf: "I've had one hell of a day."
>
> Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: "Sorry. You ok? What's up?"
>
> dolf: "It's all in a day's work mate--I've just put an end to the Catholic 
> Church, and in so doing created the opportunity for the Commonwealth of 
> Australia to be a Republic by deposing the Queen.
>
> And nobody can say thanks!"
>
> Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: "Well that's a pretty kick ass day. I 
> despise both. So thanks from me :)"
>
> dolf: "You are welcome anytime--it's true I have done so.
>
> It's a shocking reality for them."
>
> Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: "I'm sure but you've done us all a 
> favour."
>
> dolf: "I spent 3hrs today pleading my cause in front of psychiatrists so 
> that they wouldn't lock me up again due to persecutions by a gay doctor.
>
> They did not appreciate that in justifying my claims over their wrongful 
> conduct, they then had a duty of restitution for such a crime and their 
> traumatising conduct in that perverse act."
>
> Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: "What can I say to that :)"
>
> dolf: "My love for them has gone cold."
>
> Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: "Hehe me too now."
>
> dolf: "Not one of them has sufficient integrity for loyalty and neither do 
> I hold any dear enough to call friend."
>
> Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: "Both are corrupt."
>
> dolf: "Each seeks after his own."
>
> Traumatised of Elizabeth Bay 28 yo: "For sure!"
>
> Tactical Advantage: "How was your weekend??"
>
> dolf: "Very productive, I was overcome by a revelation, which I was able 
> to put into words.
>
> Today I spent 3 hours with psychiatrists as Saint Vincent's Hospital, 
> pleading with them over my liberty so that they may understand the extent, 
> magnitude and gravity of my legal claim against the hospital (as a Roman 
> Catholic Institution) and of my authorities under the Commonwealth which I 
> have as a prerogative and the substantial (and not a delusional) reality 
> which others find most threatening. Their inability or refusal to meet 
> their obligations of substantiation to justify what is now considered 
> unlawful by them, has now given me the lawful ability to take a 
> determined, forceful and punitive action as retribution against them.
>
> I was able to walk out of the place happy in the knowledge that they are 
> at the very least aware of the trauma which resulted following my 
> experience of persecutions from Dr Mark Bloch and the hospital's 
> consequential besieging conduct. By happenstance, a consequence of my 
> being struck by a motor vehicle on the day immediately after such lawful 
> and considered contest against this doctor's deliberative distortions, 
> unethical and perverse conduct. Was the opportunity to obtain two 
> independent medical assessments to the contrary and in denial as 
> disqualification of Saint Vincent's Hospital's conduct. These alternative 
> medical opinions are distinguished by the absence of any reference to the 
> traumatic effect which was consequential to the sustained injuries and 
> clearly convey an alert, calm, responsive and considered disposition.
>
> The fascinating thing being, that Saint Vincent's Hospital was acting 
> outside the permissibility of authority which the legislation grants as 
> power to effect an involuntary admission. That in the circumstance of 
> having obtained two independent medical opinions within 24 hours following 
> a car accident, as the contrary evidence of a calm disposition and 
> refutations of any threats tendered by evidence as to the non-existent 
> basis of the original claimed intent. That they do not have an authority 
> to besiege or to detain me in such a circumstance so as to cause a person 
> to be traumatised by such unrestrained and frenzied conduct as theirs. And 
> in having established that such criteria for involvement as non existent, 
> neither do they have any imperative to compel me by a hand delivered 
> notice, of the mandated requirement for an attendance made on the false 
> claim of a fresh criteria for assessment. Which establishes that the 
> hospital, had no remaining impetus as legislative authority to detain, 
> summons me to attend or effect my involuntary surrender on what is only 
> inconsequential justification and rendered effectual by untruthful 
> obstructions made of the lawful cause and integrity of my action.
>
> On five occasions there were attempts to scurrilously characterise the 
> conduct of intentioned behaviour with fictions. That I tested the extent 
> of the voluntary freedom which I had available to me against their 
> discretionary use of the permissibility of authority under the 
> legislation. And I did so by standing up and expressing a need to 
> leave--which in being told that I could not now do and had to remain, 
> suggested clearly that I was being improperly held as misuse of the 
> legislative authority.
>
> I negotiated by verbal agreement, the terms of treatment for effecting 
> recovery as following: "They have agreed that my contesting the doctor's 
> conduct is without grounds for intervention by them--that matter is 
> closed. And agreed with my suggestion, that I have been recently 
> traumatised by actions of others and that I ought to enjoy 3 months of 
> tranquil intervention co-ordinated via my General Practitioner."
>
> This becomes a test of ethical conduct as to the compliance given by the 
> Psychiatry Registrar Dr Lyn Chiem and as the senior Psychiatrist Dr 
> McGeorge, who has now placed himself into jeopardy as loss of career and 
> as a matter of public scrutiny. And consequently, by letter dated 29 
> February 2012 they have convincingly failed to dignify their conduct as 
> being lawful. Their response attempts to obscure by designating as 
> "strictly private and confidential" what is of vital public interest. In 
> that it not only fails to convey what was "discussed and agreed upon from 
> that appointment" but attempts to re-establish the priority emphasis of 
> which party has accountability for co-ordinating that care: "You will 
> continue to engage with Vincent's Mental Health Services through your case 
> manager [.] and we will liaise with your GP." But Saint Vincent's Hospital 
> has now been delivered a fatal blow which will destroy their religious 
> belief and it will cost them $millions in compensation.
>
> My own doctor the next day, read the letters of demand which I made to Dr 
> Mark Bloch and queried why I had provided a copy to the Sydney Holocaust 
> Museum. In giving him a copy of my book on CD ROM, I remarked of my 
> capability to argue (as I do in one of my chapters) against the German 
> Philosopher Heidegger as the foremost philosopher of the 21st century. 
> Whilst the subject is too weighty and burdensome for 32yo SexyGerman79 who 
> fell silent, but had there been any infraction of Jewish sensibilities, we 
> would have heard the outrage. And there has been none of which I have been 
> made aware. He then brought up the circumstance of the recent and 
> extraordinary unrest as outrage which is promulgated throughout the Muslim 
> world--Well its already 10 years into the war, and the Americans have only 
> just now determined which "Shock and Awe" tactic was the most effective 
> way to prosecute the war. Then you simply just fuck them over with a 
> feigned sincerity as apology for what was accidental in action. But is 
> always known by its consequential effect and the reality of it being 
> viewed by others as an intentioned evil malice.
>
> Perhaps it is really just a consideration as evidence of the hypocrisy 
> which is intrinsic to Islamic religious belief, because there has been no 
> similar outrage about the sacrilegious character of my own cartoon and 
> surreal painting (self portrait) as a pillorying and polymorphic 
> crucifixion of Christ (1996). They may well find it one day, and whilst 
> this deification will surely offend Roman Catholics, who would consider it 
> a debasement of their most sacred symbols, and their cultural response is 
> a haunting reality which will never leave them. As they are entirely 
> adverse towards it as the single cause and a reminder to them for the 
> remaining term of their natural life, that theirs is a most certain 
> destiny and a rampage towards a final and an everlasting death. It is 
> entirely unknown as to whether this offends Islamic sensibilities to the 
> same heightened manner as the desecration of the Koran. It firstly 
> requires drawing their attention towards a knowledge of its existence, 
> before any determination of its effectiveness can be made:
>
>
> - http://www.grapple369.com/memeBrain_files/authorgrapple369.png
>
> Carnival {"A farewell to the flesh"}: Pillorying & Polymorphic Christ 
> (Pillorying and Atonement in Jewish culture) @ 9:41:50 AM 25 January 2012
> Image: 1996 Surreal painting (self portrait) Pillorying & polymorphic 
> crucifixion of Christ by (SOS) Sebastian Oscar Strensen
>
> "Those who attacked the Diggers' graves are clearly of the same ilk and 
> are obviously wish to resist the beckoning call of civilisation. Remember 
> when they hung that offensive Piss Christ photo at the National Gallery? 
> It was an image of a plastic crucifix immersed in the urine of its gutless 
> creator, Andres Serrano. The Catholic Archbishop of Melbourne George Pell 
> sought a Supreme Court injunction to prevent the picture going on display. 
> That failed, and Pell unhappily accepted the umpire's verdict.
>
> In Melbourne, two young blokes hit the picture with a hammer and, later, 
> it was torn from the wall. Pell condemned the attackers. Of course it was 
> grossly offensive to Christians, but they didn't set out to kill Serrano, 
> nor did he need to go in to hiding. It goes without saying that Serrano 
> didn't have the courage to do something similar to an image of Mohammad. I 
> wonder what might have been the reaction of Australia's rightly insulted 
> Muslims." [Some ungrateful Libyan Muslims desecrate our history, By Alan 
> Howe, Herald Sun 5 March 2012]
>
> I joked with him about what would likely to have happened yesterday and 
> whether I would have been involuntarily sectioned, if they had known, that 
> my singular intention was to effect a disdainful brutalisation of them by 
> the slaughter of the nuns who own the shop--And I proudly expressed the 
> view of its anticipated effectiveness, in being for them an especially 
> enhanced and grievous reality by virtue of the fact that the Catholic nuns 
> live within a worldview as delusional claim to superiority, where they 
> mistakenly believe there is no verity and surety greater to their own 
> belief. As they simply have no awareness of something much greater than 
> them. It therefore has the very real capability of manifesting a most 
> pronounced distress as uncontrolled anxieties and palpitations. A loss of 
> bodily function and breathing control, an incapacity of speech and most 
> probably resulting in death, as my intentioned act of a most discomforting 
> awareness of a loss of soul. A judgement and revenge made against them. 
> What do you think is implied by the claim that I would effect a collapse 
> and forfeiture by the Catholic Religious Order, who have no remaining 
> legitimacy within Australian life?
>
> I described to him, my well intentioned purpose, which I conveyed before 
> even beginning the 3 hrs of pleading my own cause of liberty with the 
> psychiatrists yesterday. I had sought to protect them (purposefully left 
> in draft disposition in that specific regard) in relation to the mechanics 
> of the document. And described it's capability for manifesting trauma as 
> notionally equivalent to getting on the cross with Jesus. And explained to 
> them that whilst no harm was being intentioned towards them. That should 
> their sensibilities be moved to an empathy with my representations, they 
> should clearly convey their free accept of it. The course of my 
> presentation, would then focus on how the methodology, as recourse to the 
> habitual use of obstructions, which move one towards the concealment of 
> any intentioned process and instead having a reliance upon scurrilous 
> distortions of any immediacy and capability for threat for actuality, has 
> a mitigating effect on the permissibility of authority under the 
> legislation.
>
> At one point I brought to their attention, the expressed need to avoid the 
> risky action of reading and consuming the document at too rapid and 
> careless rate. As you may unnecessarily enter into a painful anxious state 
> of fear which rendered them incapable of speech. That I was responding to 
> the outstanding matter of psychiatrist Peter Sternhell's slanderous 
> characterisations of the substantial reality, vital effectiveness and the 
> substance of my own religious belief. The improper, immodest and 
> blasphemous characterisation by them, as being irrational and delusional 
> was often repeated without substantiation by Dr. Meredith Stone (and I 
> have seen her with child). To whom I have also intentioned to effect a 
> similar retaliation against those persons, as a consequence to their 
> slanderous, false and haughty characterisations of me and my belief as 
> delusional and as cause for their sado-masochistic perversity to which I 
> was then subject to their pleasure and the pretence as beneficial claim of 
> a therapeutic process. In having furnished statements and these documents, 
> in substantiation of my legal entitlements and claim against Saint Vincent's 
> Hospital, theirs similarly, is now a requirement as an accord with 
> immediacy and a priority towards an unequivocal awareness, of their 
> obligation which is without any further grounds for delay, as a 
> requirement for them to provide an accountability for their actions and in 
> their absence any credibility as lawful criteria to provide an apology and 
> restitution for their past and continuing persecutions. And they will 
> afford me an appropriate and sovereign dignity in the acknowledgement of 
> the superiority and correctness of my substantial claim to Christian 
> belief and over that which was previously claimed of Roman Catholic 
> belief.
>
> That until they all expire, every remaining Roman Catholic, from this time 
> forward will afford to me an appropriate dignity as my entitlement which 
> is attained by the sovereign basis of my substantiated claim to Christian 
> belief and identity--such recognition of my superiority over the Roman 
> Catholic Church and its fraudulent claims to Christian identity is to be 
> accompanied by an appropriate gesturing as bowing in respect of my dignity 
> and a verbalisation which acknowledges the majesty of my triumphantism 
> over you all.
>
> "Stop bitching. Put in a complaint to HREOC based on lunacy/disability, 
> preferential Xment for Gooks." [Shane Dowling alias Kangaroo Court 
> Australia @ illusionz.admin@gmail.com]
>
> You aren't worth quoting any further. The Human Rights and Equal 
> Opportunity Commission have not dealt honestly with the complaints.
>
> "My advice is EVERYONE agree what a loonie toonie yer are, yippity 
> yippider, thats all folks!" [Shane Dowling alias Kangaroo Court Australia 
> @ illusionz.admin@gmail.com]
>
> Such gibber is pathetic: Is it possible that you enter into some realism 
> as coherence in concordance towards unity of being and complete a 
> sentence?
>
> And in the circumstance where there is a claim as deposition of the 
> Sovereign Autonomy (the Monarchy) made in relation to being Christian as 
> Religious Identity and their usage of marriage as the transformative 
> prototype and binary apparatus which is overthrown by a ternary number 
> paradigm as justifications for Gay and Lesbian Marriage.
>
> There is then the question above that of treason--as the theory proposed 
> that they have in the circumstance: NO IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION AND NO 
> PROTECTION AGAINST THE DISCLOSURE OF WHAT WAS HERETOFORE PRIVATE 
> DISCUSSIONS AS ORGANISATIONAL DELIBERATIONS.
>
> That my religious sensibilities have a priority as sovereign prerogative 
> that is above your own, which will cease and that you recognise and 
> acknowledge I possess an unprecedented authority under the Commonwealth, 
> to use whatever effective force to not only terminate any presumptuous, 
> arrogant and fascist abuses of my privileged belief, but to bring such 
> malevolence into compliance.
>
> I do intend to advertise for appropriate legal services--because I don't 
> wish to have my actions as lawful opportunities prejudiced any further. I 
> have at 0930 hrs this morning on 7 March 2012 sought legal advice in my 
> matters by making contact with a legal firm Maurice Blackburn & co--I only 
> sought that advice after first touching and saying a prayer at the Sydney 
> memorial to the Christian Gathering in 1788. However they have not 
> responded in a sufficient timeframe--and the offer is extended to which 
> ever law firm, possessing such necessary skills and being apprised of my 
> public statements about those matters, makes contact with me on my mobile 
> phone to establish an appointment.
>
> And again at 1335 hours on 7 March 2012 I attended at the offices of 
> Slater & Gordon lawyers with the view of making an appointment and was 
> told by the receptionist, that it could be made only via a telephone 
> enquiry. I think that such legal firms actively discriminate against HIV 
> infected persons. And I have raised that observation in relation to their 
> pursuit of Mesothelioma claims. And indeed I had some disparaging haughty 
> female lawyer attempt to disavow my use of the term "interrogation" to 
> describe the perverse conduct of Saint Vincent's medical staff.
>
> I was ushered into a meeting room by her and she attempted to connect me 
> via a phone there--however it appeared to me that this was just theatrics 
> and the line was silent, and so I indicated my willingness to return home 
> and make the call from there. I remarked about this rouse to a lady on my 
> out of the building, how uncivil I found this whole process as they 
> allowed no member of the public (as being too common, naive and perverse) 
> to come to their door.
>
> That's two law firms eliminated.
>
> What is it about honest weights in justice and a ternary conception of 
> Number that is so difficult for you? Mens Rea!
>
> I thereby have by such submission, a special Parliamentary Prerogative, in 
> having contributed my work in progress as notes of my complex system of 
> philosophical / theological belief to a Senate Committee Enquiry.
>
> That the Church then, it's Institutions and people have in unrestrained 
> prejudiced conduct directed towards me, perpetuated by such voluntary act 
> and a determined will against the parliament, all Law and Authority of the 
> Sovereign Crown of the Commonwealth of Australia.
>
> And given an awareness of the consequence which have been my judgements, 
> there is a compulsion placed upon Cardinal George Pell should he return to 
> and retain sufficient bodily strength. If not he, then another who shall 
> bear it in his stead. For him to proffer a confession over their 
> transgressions as prejudiced sins committed against me and to make an 
> appropriate restitution by the provision of Saint Vincent's Hospital's 
> forfeited property holdings, as the bestowal of a compensation for the 
> egregious abuses committed toward me by the Roman Catholic Church, it's 
> remaining institutions and people--and the pervasive agreement amongst 
> Australians who expressed an apathy for change.
>
> And if all others are too terrified, their past impertinence now rendered 
> impotent of speech, then hear such an apology from the Pope this very day.
>
> And if this action of mine is effectual in it's undertaking (ie. 
> breath-taking), then there is no doubt as to the lack of truth in the 
> slanderous portrayal of my faith in God and his kind acts as watch care of 
> my soul, as somehow constituting a delusional belief (no-one had ever 
> given me praise, but only scorn for such belief) as the determined wicked 
> desire by others to dispossess me of mind, being and soul and any hope for 
> eternity. That such belief, indeed not only has substance, but is capable 
> of purposeful and directed action. Others who have outstanding matters as 
> failed obligations and duty towards me, will certainly now be moved to act 
> on those and to bring them to resolution--why did I need to ask more than 
> the once. Had there been by others, even a modicum of public recognition 
> as appreciation of my work--I would not have had to resort to the laying 
> aside of my pacifist values and its regard of life. So as to bring 
> sufficient action against your indifference, to grab your attention as to 
> the need to fulfil your failed obligations. And to remind you about what 
> you had forgotten and had no remaining intention or concern for. That such 
> action is not sport as an enjoyable pursuit. But it was a most arduous 
> thing, I have ever done. And mandated entirely by your own evil towards me 
> with a creeping consequence which was no different, other than my capacity 
> to be patient for a day of retribution against you.
>
> In the circumstance of Cardinal George Pell's committed grievous sin with 
> no opportunity for grace, I stood alone as the non-Catholic with others 
> who were, to endure their same scorn, and then waited over 10 years, and 
> heard not one voice from any other person who cared enough to plead their 
> cause as I have done, all that time as their faithful brother who fought 
> for them with God by my side and won it overwhelmingly, when they were not 
> capable of doing so for themselves. And in that respect, no one is capable 
> of condemning me for the actions I have taken because of your failure and 
> unwillingness to act.
>
> 17:09 (CST) hrs on 29 February 2012 @ WASHINGTON, D.C. (Reuters) - A 
> lesbian woman from the nation's capital wants a Catholic priest relieved 
> of his duties after he denied her communion at her mother's Maryland 
> funeral because she lives with another woman, she said on Wednesday.
>
> The local archdiocese has apologized for the actions of Father Marcel 
> Guarnizo, but Barbara Johnson, who is gay and lives with her lesbian 
> partner, said that was not enough.
>
> Guarnizo officiated at a funeral mass for Loetta Johnson on Saturday at 
> Saint John Neumann Catholic Church in Gaithersburg, about 25 miles 
> northwest of Washington. He told attendees that only church members in a 
> "state of grace" would be allowed to receive communion, Johnson said.
>
> Johnson said that when she approached, the priest covered the communion 
> chalice with his hand, "looked me in the eye and said 'I cannot give you 
> communion because you live with a woman.'"
>
> The priest told her "in the eyes of the church, that is a sin," she said. 
> She and her family told the Archdiocese of Washington, which has issued an 
> apology.
>
> Catholic church teachings condemn homosexuality, and the church considers 
> homosexual acts to be sinful. But the Archdiocese said in a statement that 
> questions about a person's right to receive communion should be addressed 
> privately and it was not policy to "publicly reprimand" worshipers.
>
> The Archdiocese would not comment on Guarnizo's status, citing the matter 
> as a personnel issue. Johnson said she does not want to focus on the 
> incident as a gay-rights issue but wants the priest to stop doing pastoral 
> work for the way he handled her mother's service.
>
> "We're urging the church to make that decision, so that this doesn't 
> happen to anyone else, to any other families," Johnson said. "It's the 
> right thing to do."
>
> "I think everyone has their gifts, and my family believes performing the 
> responsibilities of a parish priest does not fall under his list of 
> gifts," she added. [Gay woman wants priest relieved of duties after 
> communion, Joe Danielewicz, � 2012 Reuters]
>
> Mason Barge (masonbarge@gmail.com): "It's a comment on human nature, and 
> especially people posting on the Usenet, that so many non-Catholic people 
> should even have an op[i]nion about the people to whom the Catholic Church 
> gives communion, much less think their opinion is important enough to 
> share with others."
>
> Joan in GB-W: (jjkreus@aol.com): "It's a comment on human nature, and 
> especially men posting on the Usenet, that so many women should even have 
> an opinion about their sexuality and contraception. Let Rush lead them 
> into battle and forgive all of the partners of these young sinning women. 
> Gasp, and some of them might be or might eventually be your daughters."
>
> Bill Steele (ws21@cornell.edu): "It's a comment on human nature that so 
> many people posting on Usenet believe what they have to say is so 
> desperately important that they must cross-post it to irrelevant groups."
>
> Sword of Baal (ramrod@truthonly.com): "Oh yes and that URL does not have 
> anything like that junk quotes above. Want to try 
> again.................... "
>
> Cedro Wooley (cedro.wooly@olympia-tumwater.org): "Of course it does. It 
> supports every example I gave in my post. You being a verified dick 
> sucking ass fucked homosexual would never admit that though."
>
> Sword of Baal (ramrod@truthonly.com): "Okay, but, with your permission, I 
> want to again try to disprove what I know are facts."
>
> Sbalneav (sbalneav@alburg.net): "Here's what [we're] talking about.
>
> Proof implies an absolute certainty that reality never can provide. This 
> comes from it's alternative usage in the mathematical field, where one 
> proves things. These mathematical proofs are absolutes. The problem is, 
> proof has multiple meanings. It can mean "evidence establishing a fact", 
> or it can mean "A logical or mathematical formal argument that shows how 
> conclusions can be drawn from premises". Or, more simply, one is based on 
> things in the real world, and the other is an intellectual exercise.
>
> Theists often either ask "What proof do you have that God doesn't exist?" 
> or say "I have proof that God exists.". In the first case, they're using 
> proof in the "evidence" sense; do you have evidence that God doesn't 
> exist? Of course, we all know that it's impossible to provide positive 
> evidence for something not existing. We infer it's non-existence from the 
> lack of evidence that we would expect to be there. There's no positive 
> evidence for unicorns not existing, there's a LACK of evidence that we'd 
> expect if unicorns did exist; no unicorn skeletons found, no reliable 
> eyewitness accounts of unicorns, etc. When, of course, we cannot PROVIDE 
> positive evidence that a God exists, they shout "AHA! So if you cannot 
> PROVE he doesn't exist, then he COULD exist!"
>
> When theists use the SECOND form ("I have proof...") they typically 
> present something that's less about evidence, and more about some kind of 
> mathematical or logical proof of God's existence. They'll give you the 
> Kalam argument, or an ontological argument, or a "Maximally Good" 
> argument, or something. When we say, "Yes, but that doesn't mean God 
> *actually* exists", they shout "But my proof is ironclad! It's logically 
> correct! It MUST be true!"
>
> In the first case, they want evidence from us. And if we say "Where's YOUR 
> proof God exists?", what WE mean is evidence. In the second case, they 
> bait and switch evidence for a logical or intellectual argument. In both 
> cases, they use the word "proof", but it changes it's focus from evidence 
> to logical correctness.
>
> So my point is; let's actually say what we mean. If what we need is 
> evidence that will compel us to accept that a position is true, then we 
> should ASK for evidence. Don't ask for "proof", or when they give you 
> Godel's ontological argument, you get sucked in to arguing math and logic.
>
> Using the Bible, Quran, and Talmud as examples, each of them makes 
> predictions that are TESTABLE in the real world. And by *testable*, we 
> mean things that either would have left *evidence* that we can find 
> (Global Flood), or can be tested today and should leave evidence (ask and 
> thou shalt receive).
>
> And as for [the] assertion that Science actually proves thi[n]gs, that's 
> just nonsense. I provided him with two separate links from .edu domains, 
> and invited him to talk to any university professor or, heck, go and grab 
> a book on the scientific method from a library. He, of course, flatly 
> refused."
>
> Cedro Wooley (cedro.wooly@olympia-tumwater.org): "Have [a go] at it, 
> kangaroo boy."
>
> dolf: "22 / 7 = You are a lying cunt {an unpleasant or stupid person}.
>
> Years ago, a mathematical prototype (as someone else's intellectual 
> property) comprising the initial four dialectic magic square strata to the 
> Grapple noumenon reality as alternative to the church's own historical use 
> of the celestial hierarchy was personally served on the Melbourne, 
> Victoria (Australia) arch-diocese of the Roman Catholic Church.
>
> How then are the Catholic Church of Victoria at War on Same Sex Unions?"
>
> Sword of Baal (ramrod@truthonly.com): "That goes to show what a low bred 
> uneducated idiot we are dealing with here."
>
> Cedro Wooley (cedro.wooly@olympia-tumwater.org): "Yes, you are correct in 
> your conclusion that my post shows, '.what a low bred uneducated idiot we 
> are dealing with here.' What else could be said for people who knowingly 
> and willfully spread a deadly disease simply to satisfy the sexual 
> promiscuity."
>
> Fidem Turbare (the non-existent atheist goddess): "Your understanding of 
> basic anatomy is clearly incorrect, for the opening at the lower end of 
> the alimentary canal in most species is insufficient for purposes of any 
> level of intellectual discourse."
>
> Cedro Wooley (cedro.wooly@olympia-tumwater.org): "Except when the bearer 
> is a male homosexual then it can speak, shout, send smoke signals, and 
> sign. However, its vocabulary is limited to two words, 'FUCK ME.'"
>
> dolf: "Hey Mr. Jingoist Kangaroo weren't you in Wake in Fright, how's it 
> hanging?"
>
> Sword of Baal (ramrod@truthonly.com): "Crap and lies cut[.] O[h] M[y] 
> G[od] there is nothing left !!!!!!!!!!!!"
>
> Cedro Wooley (cedro.wooly@olympia-tumwater.org): "Flatulence and asshole?"
>
> dolf: "Skunk and Pisswacker mate! Did I ever tell you about the time I'd 
> given Sophie Mirabella (n�e Panopoulos), as the Honorable Member for Indi, 
> a nominal sum of $200 plus GST just so I could get access to the Federal 
> Attorney-General Phillip Ruddock, who spoke at a Collins Street, Melbourne 
> venue on Islamic extremists?
>
> I mentioned to him my Grapple paradigm as informal research work in 
> progress on a noumenal reality and the belief that the circumstance of 
> public holidays (Australia Day, ANZAC Day, Armistice Day) emitted a 
> certain state of consciousness as character upon the Australian populace.
>
> I had slipped a couple $50 to assist in their auctioning bid for a bottle 
> of wine against Liberal stalwart John Elliot and with whom I later 
> discussed the opulent marble facade and rare timber paneling which existed 
> in the Port Authority building, where I then had an apartment.
>
> Money apparently buys access to the Liberal Party, but it was a legitimate 
> fund raiser amongst Party members."
>
> When is Cardinal George Pell going to begin his public repentance against 
> the prejudiced conduct directed towards me, perpetuated by such voluntary 
> act and a determined will against the parliament, all Law and Authority of 
> the Sovereign Crown of the Commonwealth of Australia?
>
> My 27 November 2005 Rainbow Sash comments made on the public boundary 
> outside the Saint Patrick's Roman Catholic Church situated at 
> Maffra-Briagolong Road, Briagolong weren't reported in the press either. 
> Such protest was made against the Roman Catholic Church's similar lack of 
> regard for religious belief as an autonomous and sovereign Natural Law, 
> Common Law and Constitutional human right: "The Australian Catholic Church 
> appears to be advocating present day religious, political, organizational 
> and social values that on matters of sexuality and seventh-day Sabbatarian 
> Everlasting Covenant have not come to repentance on the denial of 
> Autonomous, Sovereign, Common Law and Constitutional Rights of others.
>
> Your claim to religious belief is by any objective measure intrinsically 
> morally disordered."
>
> Rule of Life (jjbruce@gmail.com): "It[']s bongs out back of parli[am]ent
> It[']s needles and hero[i]n in the [Q]ueen[']s palace
> It[']s a[mph]etamines round the world
> There was no-one else, dehon[ou]r and treason: At Her Majesty's Service
>
> The Crown will kill all homosexuals
> The Crown has acted out of order in allowing a gay race.
> I hold the right, Him Her
> It should be known that the world revolves around two people
> At anyone time male and female: The Influence
>
> There was no word in the stars to describe gay and homosexual
> And could not be used on Crown Notices
>
> It is against the law to use the word homosexual except here in.
> Homosexual is against the law.
>
> It is against the law to question: The Crown--God
>
> The one the girls sing about--You"
>
> dolf: "Wasn't the Pope recently asked on: 'Creationists need [for a] 
> Catholic vision'?"
>
> BroilJAB (DesignDenier@wmconnect.com): "Lets hope the Holy Pontiff sets 
> many creationists back on the right path."
>
> Vurgil (Vurgil@arg.erg): "It would be a great improvement."
>
> dolf: "He knows Greedy!"
>
> BroilJAB (DesignDenier@wmconnect.com): "From what I understand."
>
> Vurgil (Vurgil@arg.erg): "Which is nothing!"
>
> dolf: "Is it painful?"
>
> A letter of an outstanding legal claim was peacefully hand delivered to St 
> Vincent's Hospital on 3 March 2012 and following which a Rainbow Sash was 
> worn in a parade through the streets to advise all peoples of this 
> unequivocal association of claimed and substantiated Christian idealism 
> and Gay identity now being inseparable from the Commonwealth of 
> Australia's claim and advancement of ANZAC identity and idealism from 
> which such persons, by their continued antagonism towards the sovereign 
> autonomy of this nation--Are excluded.
>
> That hell is now the destiny for all of you, who are similarly indifferent 
> to your obligation and duty towards others!
>
> - dolf
> - www.grapple369.com/memeBrain.html

Cool. But it ain't baseball. 

Fuck wit!

On 31/03/12 2:37 PM, M wrote:
> Cool. But it ain't baseball.

I’ve heard recently that Sydney radio shock jock, Karl Sandilands is 
suffering from shrinking testicles. You ain't seen nothing until you've 
had some fat queen sado-masochistic faggot actor as a gym junkie from 
Sydney going troppo at being called a plump frump.

Does your dictionary make haughty a lawful alternative to skanking 
whore, or self conceit a synonym for your shit?

Brad (bradvk2qq@gmail.com): “W[hat] T[he] F[uck] are you talking about?”

atec77 (atec77@hotmail.com): “No one know[s] or cares. It is after all 
just dork talk!”

dolf: “Karl you’re a chook.”

Ish (m@g.net): “I thought so. What’s the matter? Afraid of women?”

Denis / Ish (denis.mattg@yahoo.de / ish.mattg@yahoo.de): “Is exactly 
what I am”

Ish (xm@c.net): “You can’t consider a faggot like you a ‘woman’.

Is it really beyond you to believe a woman can like baseball and not 
necessarily want to read about your obsessions in a baseball group? 
Chauvinist!”.

denis (mrwilson6982@yahoo.de): “You can't consider a faggot tranny like 
you a ‘woman’.”

dolf: “There’s only one queen and that’s Madonna bitch.”

Ishtar (ishtarnec@gmail.com): “Fucking frog. Awful funny you show up 
when the trolls do.”

dolf: “Qu'est-ce? Aren’t you just the trolley dolly from the women's 
hospital.” [B-Day Song (feature M.I.A) Madonna MDNA ℗ 2012 Boy Toy Inc.]

What is a Nation? (Qu'est-ce qu'une nation?) is a 1882 essay by French 
historian Ernst Renan (1823–1892), known for the statements that a 
nation is "a daily referendum", and that nations are based as much on 
what the people jointly forget, as what they remember. It is frequently 
quoted or anthologized in works of history or political science 
pertaining to nationalism. [Wikipedia 2012: Qu’est-ce?]

M (storm@c.net): “What is this doing in a baseball group? Nobody here 
gives a damn for your opinions, even that Rosecomm idiot plonked you. 
Too bad...he might have said ‘Pete Rose belongs in the Hall of Fame 
playing with homosexual-sex-obsessed dee-nis's pecker.’ Now THAT would 
be an appropriate job for him.”

Barry OGrady (atheist@hotmail.com.au): “You don't understand yourself at 
all. You think it clever not to punctuate. What are trying to prove?

You probably think its cool to wear a baseball cap on backwards. You 
conform to what you think is non conforming.”

dolf: “That Catholic bitch apologist Kristina Keneally is dismissing the 
fact that religious unbelief and disbelief which are your matters of 
conscience as indulgence and belief is also someone else's human rights 
claim which you are diminishing--Keep silent you skanking whore because 
I am speaking in judgement against your soul.

Your fucked up Catholic Religious belief gives you, as an American 
refugee, the right to Australian Citizenship and political party 
privilege--But not Me!”

Ish (m@g.net): “What part of "I'm a straight female baseball fan" didn't 
you understand? Can you read or is your life all cut and paste?”

dolf: “I accuse you of indifference. Stop buying your meat pies from 
Tony Abbott, you are no longer welcome.”

This pastry became a staple dish in medieval times, and was eventually 
called "pyes" or "pies". The origin of this name comes from the type of 
meat commonly used as filling. Beef, lamb, and duck were employed, but a 
majority of the time it was the magpie pigeon that was the main 
ingredient. Magpies in medieval England were originally named pie. Some 
historians think that the popular usage of 'pie' birds led to the pastry 
dish being named pie as well, while etymologists suggest that pies were 
named after these birds "from a supposed resemblance between the 
miscellaneous contents of pies and the assortment of objects collected 
by thieving magpies." The first use of the word "pie" as food is 
referenced in 1303 by the Oxford English Dictionary; also stating that 
the term became popular and widely utilized by 1362. [Wikipedia 2012: 
Meat Pies]

Thom Madura (Tommadura@optonline.net): “WE do not need religion to be 
kind and generous with others - Dolf”

dolf: “How is your pedophile porno collection going--still doing it for 
you?”

Thom Madura (Tommadura@optonline.net): “YOU are mixing me up with YOU - Dolf

IF you are mentioning it - it can only be to compare it to yours.

REST assured that I have no time for that nonsense - so YOU are still 
the leader in that area?”

dolf: “You haven't answered the question about your pedophile porno 
collection...”

Thom Madura (Tommadura@optonline.net): “Yes - I did - as I noted YOUR 
record collection in that area - is unmatched by me - I am not a 
participant in that.”

dolf: “Porn isn't my thing.

So what are you now saying about "YOUR record collection in that area?"

That you don't star in any of them.”

% (persent@gmail.com): “Stupid replies get stupid replies.”

Barry OGrady (atheist@hotmail.com.au): “Dolt is a poof of God!”

dolf: “Forget the punctuation, learn to spell.”

% (persent@gmail.com): “Gin what?”

dolf: “Fuck wit!”

M (storm@c.net): “Cool. But it ain't baseball [in newsgroup: 
comp.sys.mac.apps]”

Fidem Turbare (the non-existent atheist goddess): “The subject is UNIX, 
not eunuchs.”

dolf: “Why do Americans always find that funny--Are you Mormon?”

Fred Hall (fkhall@databasix.com): “Izzit you, Qolon?”

dolf: “In tights? No! But in my RM Williams Brookstead Jean: Yes!”

Fred Hall (fkhall@databasix.com): “Kook Hall of Fame vote recorded, Qolon”

dolf: “It's a true story.

Hence factual.

Sorry kooks...”

Solon (Greek: Σόλων, c. 638 BCE – 558 BCE) was an Athenian statesman, 
lawmaker, and poet. He is remembered particularly for his efforts to 
legislate against political, economic and moral decline in archaic 
Athens. His reforms failed in the short term, yet he is often credited 
with having laid the foundations for Athenian democracy. [Wikipedia 
2012: Solon]

- http://www.grapple369.com/memeBrain_files/nedkellygame.gif

Fred Hall (fkhall@databasix.com): “Sure, but what about Ned Kelly?”

dolf: “At least with my story you can listen to Madonna's newly released 
MDNA album...”

Fred Hall (fkhall@databasix.com): “No thank you. DataBasix - Continuing 
to kick USENet ass.

Science flew man to the moon. Religion flew man into buildings…”

Old Jinglebollocks (old.jinglebollocks@gmail.com): “Doesn't matter any more.

Can't be bothered even to read what you bums are writing on Usenet.

Fuck ye, the whole damned lot o' ye.”

I thought Jamie Rowe was discriminatory in the manner by which he 
undertook his seeking of housemates in Liverpool Street with Gay 
Share-space was indulgently disrespectful of the person's dignity as 
autonomic right. That collectively these radio personalities are by 
their fascist dog commentary, not mindful of duty to State. I also 
called the Chief Commissioner office with that same calmness of mind--it 
is therefore dishonest to convey it as otherwise.

Flag NOT Fag Wa[i]ver (leopold@aohell.org): “Many targets, one bomb.

B O O M !”

dolf: “...and I want to call in an airstrike...is that wrong?”

Defence Minister Stephen Swan in addressing the media on 7 March 2012, 
over ADF shenanigans does raise some matters of parallelism and I do 
note as advice in which I agree.

On 13 March 2012 I followed my community health nurse and confidant’s 
recent example of determined conduct as a statement of dissatisfaction 
made in resignation and contempt over the unlawful character and the 
frenzied, brutalising, hate filled manner by which the New South Wales 
Police Service and Saint Vincent’s Acute Care Team have conducted 
themselves in my affairs.

Following their advice that these persons were seeking to make a 
submission to a Magistrate’s Court in order to forcibly gain entry into 
my apartment and access me as to the nature, condition and circumstances 
of my psychological health--they again resorted to unlawful, threatening 
and unbridled aggression in their conduct outside my premises and a week 
later they murdered a Brazilian youth (certainly not a Brazil Holland 
hero) by tasering him in a circumstance of mistaken identity over an 
alleged theft of biscuits (a wafer perhaps?).

- http://www.manhunt.net/profile/BRAZIL_HOLLAND

Manhunt (Brazil_Holland): Age: 34, Position: Top, Height: 6’0”, Build: 
Twink, Ethnicity: Mixed, Hair: Buzzed, Eyes: Brown, Cock: 9" (Uncut)

This was now the 3rd occasion where this intrusion against me had 
occurred and which I viewed as an unwanted, unreasoned and aggressive 
conduct against my autonomy and rights under the State as a person of 
intellect, integrity and dignity who is generally of a calm and happy 
disposition. This conduct by them has unnecessarily tainted, prejudiced 
and rendered toxic my living environment--goodness knows what 
monstrosity the neighbours think of me.

These grievous incursions by State Authorities who have no desire to 
give any accountability for their actions and neither do they wish to 
grant me a modicum of credence with respects to my religious belief as 
being a substantial reality. Accordingly, I have left both Sydney and 
the State of New South Wales with no intention of ever returning to 
their culture of disrespect, which lacks civility in its inhumanity. I 
have therefore terminated my lease and left 3rd parties to pack and 
convey my goods and chattels interstate at a cost of over $4,000. Given 
this my book has now reached a level of completeness. I believe that 
such actions by me as public defiance of the State’s conduct which I 
have taken with due consideration as a calculated exercise of voluntary 
will accompanying determined action against them, will invariably 
manifest a disturbing effect and consequence upon their enjoyment as 
participation in any further ANZAC celebrations.

As I crossed the State border into Victoria as a safer haven from their 
persecutions and traumatising conduct, I advised those parties of my 
intention to leave the State.

This departure gave me an opportunity to meet a female friend of Private 
Jake Kovco who had some life experiences which augmented mine. There was 
no disagreement about the plausibility of any aspect about my belief 
that Kovco’s conduct was deliberate and being passed off as accidental. 
His making of a video record of his service was in itself an unusual 
act. I formed the view from the sloppy and casual manner by which he 
portrayed himself that it seemed different to how other soldiers are 
normally portrayed in the media.

The casualness as his routine conduct was at odds with his disruption of 
determined policy events. That the uncharacteristic behaviour about his 
making of the video record seems to support the notion as a view he 
held, that the Australian soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan were 
forgotten by the general populace, who went about their lives as though 
they weren’t there and what they were doing wasn’t important. He was in 
fact undertaking a course of action which required complex processes 
that were not normal for him. That his intention to have his body return 
on ANZAC day was a dishonourable and opportunistic conduct as an attempt 
to impose himself upon the State in a most undignified manner.

That I was right to protest as I had done and what a waste of time and 
money the Military Tribunals into his death were.

Also conveyed to me was an equivalent experience to my own, about 
private sexual acts being recorded by others and unbeknownst to 
ourselves, were then publicised amongst a group in an attempt to 
dishonour a person’s dignity and privacy--That this was technically a 
rape because the sexual act accompanied a video recording which was made 
against a person’s will.

Have you met my kangaroo Jingoist bitch prostitute: Shane Dowling?

"We know what you mean by Faceless Men, Krudd, you anti-termite, errrrhm 
semite.....Coz Mark Arsebib, is just an ass-licker.” [7 March 2012, 
Shane Dowling alias Kangaroo Court Australia @ illusionz.admin@gmail.com]

The dolt defamation on the Internet is going to come to an end!

“[With opposition] 101 [asks “Does the Zionist Lobby have blood on its 
hands in Australia?”] [7 March 2012, Shane Dowling alias Kangaroo Court 
Australia @ illusionz.admin@gmail.com]

Semantics!

- dolf