Port Forwarding: Device:Port = Router:Port? - Webcam's IP addr = 10.0.0.140, and it's set up to
use port 8000
- Router's IP addr = 1.0.0.1, and it's port forwarding is set
up to forward port 8000 to 10.0.140.
- I can view the camera using 10.0.0.140:8000, no problem.
The Question: Should I be able to view the camera using
10.0.0.1:8000?
--
PeteCresswell
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:13:01 -0400, "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid>
wrote:
> - Webcam's IP addr = 10.0.0.140, and it's set up to
> use port 8000
>
> - Router's IP addr = 1.0.0.1, and...
What is the difference between local port forwarding (-L) and remote port forwarding (-R)Hi!
I need to do an SSH tunnel to encrypt the data sent between an agent
and a the server. I'm able to establish a tunnel but there's something
that I can't understand...
What is the difference between the bit -L and the bit -R. I've read
the man of SSH on Fedora. It's seems to be simple but in practice, I
don't understand.
Can somebody help me on this subject?
Thanks a lot!
Yann
> What is the difference between the bit -L and the bit -R.
-L forwards a port from the client to the server.
-R forwards a port from the server to the client.
--
To reply by email, replace "deadspam.com" by "alumni.utexas.net"
In article <d73d6e32.0404262310.5dd662ed@posting.google.com>,
Yann Laviolette <yann_laviolette@gnome.org> wrote:
>What is the difference between the bit -L and the bit -R. I've read
>the man of SSH on Fedora. It's seems to be simple but in practice, I
>don't understand.
Example: "ssh -L 2000:1.2.3.4:2000 server" is a "local" forward and will
listen on the client (ie the machine you ssh'ed from) on port 2000.
If something connects to the client on port 2000, a "channel" will be
opened inside the SSH connection and the server will connect to 1.2.3.4 on
port 2000. Any data sent or received will be forwarded over this channel.
In contrast, "ssh -R 2000:1.2.3.4:2000 server" is a "remote" forward,
which will cause the *server* to listen o...
port forwarding for multiple portsHello,
Is there any way to do a port forwarding (ssh -L
localport:remotehost:remoteport) for a range of ports?
If do not, can I do a port forwarding dinamically? (is there any
application that do something like this?)
Thanks,
RFT.
rodrigofteixeira@yahoo.com.br (RFT) writes:
>Is there any way to do a port forwarding (ssh -L
>localport:remotehost:remoteport) for a range of ports?
Not readily that I'm aware.
>If do not, can I do a port forwarding dinamically? (is there any
>application that do something like this?)
There's the -D command (which supports SOCKS right now). I've
also hacked at the source to do more interesting things. It's
certainly possible to do what you want with an unmodified SSH
server. The trick is convincing a client to do it. I've been
playing with Twisted.Conch to do this.
--kyler
In article <610789b8.0404261242.35824a3b@posting.google.com>,
RFT <rodrigofteixeira@yahoo.com.br> wrote:
>Is there any way to do a port forwarding (ssh -L
>localport:remotehost:remoteport) for a range of ports?
Use lots of "-L" command line options :-?
>If do not, can I do a port forwarding dinamically? (is there any
>application that do something like this?)
It depends on what you mean by "dynamically". Some implementations
(eg, PuTTY, OpenSSH, possibly others) have a "dynamic forward" option
which implements a SOCKS server in the SSH client, so if you application
understands...
Ports....Ports....Ports...I have a linksys WRT54G wireless access point and I have't been able to get
voice communications using Windows Messenger or Buddy Talk. With a direct
PPOE connection to my isp they voice items worked fine. What ports need to
be forwarded to allow for voice?
Thanx,
Grumpy
On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 15:05:30 GMT, William Harper spoketh
>I have a linksys WRT54G wireless access point and I have't been able to get
>voice communications using Windows Messenger or Buddy Talk. With a direct
>PPOE connection to my isp they voice items worked fine. What ports need to
>be forwarded to allow for voice?
>
>Thanx,
>
>Grumpy
>
http://messenger.msn.com/Help/#LQ10
Lars M. Hansen
http://www.hansenonline.net
(replace 'badnews' with 'news' in e-mail address)
"You're an angel with your wings broken"
...
port forwarding/ opening porthi
i'm having P4 2.4 256MB RAM with Win XP SP-2 Pro installed.
i'm using 256 kbps connection using adsl2+ router SmartAX MT882 ADSL
Router from Huawei, china
its having NAT & built in firewall.,,, i'm also using Win XP Firewall
to protect my pc..
i want to know how to use port forwarding & how to open port on router
so that i can establish connection, also i didn't understand the UDP &
TCP, what is it all about?
i want to open port for radmin connection...
also, how to know that how much secure my pc is from internet... any
resource...
i have referred to router manual but i didn't find the information..
Thank you in advance
krunal jariwala
jariwalakrunal@gmail.com wrote in news:1130958191.680401.263360
@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
> hi
> i'm having P4 2.4 256MB RAM with Win XP SP-2 Pro installed.
> i'm using 256 kbps connection using adsl2+ router SmartAX MT882 ADSL
> Router from Huawei, china
>
> its having NAT & built in firewall.,,, i'm also using Win XP Firewall
> to protect my pc..
>
> i want to know how to use port forwarding & how to open port on router
> so that i can establish connection, also i didn't understand the UDP &
> TCP, what is it all about?
> i want to open port for radmin connection...
>
> also, how to know that how much secure my pc is from internet... any
> resource...
>
> i have referred to router manual but i didn't find the...
Port forwarding questionGreetings to all,
Here is the issue that I do not know how to resolve. There is a Debian
based internet gateway with iptables firewall.
There are 3 servers currently running, all 3 with up and running web
servers (apache, apache2 and IIS). How can I direct traffic from the
Internet to the web server that is not on gateway, but in the local
network? In addition, how can enable users from the internet to use
*all* 3 web servers at their discretion (for example, when user writes
www.mydomain.net/server1 - IIS on local IP x.x.x.y server pops out,
www.mydomain.net/server2 -apache2 server on local IP x.x.x.z pops out,
etc...)?
I hope I was clear enough. :)
TIA!
--
Everything will be okay
in the end.
If it's not okay
it's not the end!
Bubba a �crit :
> There are 3 servers currently running, all 3 with up and running web
> servers (apache, apache2 and IIS). How can I direct traffic from the
> Internet to the web server that is not on gateway, but in the local
> network? In addition, how can enable users from the internet to use
> *all* 3 web servers at their discretion (for example, when user writes
> www.mydomain.net/server1 - IIS on local IP x.x.x.y server pops out,
> www.mydomain.net/server2 -apache2 server on local IP x.x.x.z pops out,
> etc...)?
If you want to do it based on the URL, then you need to use Apache on
the gateway with mod_rewrite. Something like this :
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule /server1/(.*) http://10.1.2.3/$1 [proxy,qsa...
Port forwarding questionAre there any tools out there that will do the following? In a nutshell, I
would like one process that would listen on two ports on one machine, and
one that would initiate a connection on two ports on another machine,
allowing a server application to be on machine that initiates a connection
to the client machine. I know this is not very clear, so hear is an example:
On a webserver, I would run this tool to initiate a connection to port 80 on
localhost, and initate another connection to port 777 on a client machine.
On the client machine, I would run the tool to listen to port 777, as well
as port 80. Then, when I navigate to http://locahost on the client machine,
I get a page from the webserver, but the WEBSERVER MACHINE is the one who
initiated the TCP/IP connection.
I don't think this tool would be that difficult to make, but I figure
something like this is already out there?
Thanks
Dave
Spam Tester wrote:
> Are there any tools out there that will do the following? In a nutshell, I
> would like one process that would listen on two ports on one machine, and
> one that would initiate a connection on two ports on another machine,
> allowing a server application to be on machine that initiates a connection
> to the client machine. I know this is not very clear, so hear is an example:
Hi,
this is known as "port forwarding" (look at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_forwarding). Depending on which
platfor...
Why is port forwarding more secure than opening up a port?I have never understood this very well, here is my current grasp of it..
If I open up port 110 on my router:
1. If hacker is probing random IP addresses on that port, I will be flagged
as open and he will come back and pay me a visit.
2. Any Trojans, viruses, or other malware that works its way into PCs via
port 110 will eventually stumble across my open port and infect me.
Alternatively, if I "forward" port 110 to say 192.168.0.5 (my pop3 server
PC):
1. If hacker is probing random IP addresses on that port, will I will be
flagged as closed? stealthed? worth a second visit?
2. Any Trojans, viruses or other port 110 malware will squirm through my
router and arrive at 192.168.0.5??
Please can someone clear this up for me.
Thanks
Paul
"Paul H" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:%Ifwd.453$JI3.381@newsfe1-win.ntli.net...
> I have never understood this very well, here is my current grasp of it..
>
> If I open up port 110 on my router:
>
> 1. If hacker is probing random IP addresses on that port, I will be
flagged
> as open and he will come back and pay me a visit.
Very unlikely. I'm not running anything on 110 here and I've forgotten when
I last saw anything directed at 110.
>
> 2. Any Trojans, viruses, or other malware that works its way into PCs via
> port 110 will eventually stumble across my open port and infect me.
What did you mean by "open up port 110 on my router"?
It does no...
difference between port redirect and port forwarding
hi all
can any body point out the difference between in port redirect and port
forwarding? Actually i am trying to forward/redirect all the requests to
port 26 to 25, as i cannt access port 25 from my current network. I would
appreciate if somebody could suggest a solution for this problem.
Thank you
Anil
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 18:38:43 GMT, Anil Kommareddy
<linuxkid@itslinuxhelp.com> wrote:
>Actually i am trying to forward/redirect all the requests to
>port 26 to 25, as i cannt access port 25 from my current network.
Trying to set up an open relay for SMTP? Having trouble with port
blocking? Sorry, but as I can't see any other reason for doing this,
I'd not be interested in helping you.
--
Joe Zeff
The Guy With the Sideburns
Where there's a flamethrower, there's a way.
http://www.lasfs.org http://home.earthlink.net/~sidebrnz
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 18:38:43 GMT,
Anil Kommareddy <linuxkid@itslinuxhelp.com> crossposted:
> can any body point out the difference between in port redirect and port
> forwarding? Actually i am trying to forward/redirect all the requests to
> port 26 to 25, as i can't access port 25 from my current network. I would
> appreciate if somebody could suggest a solution for this problem.
Just one possible interpretation:
Port forwarding: Forwarding connections from port XX on one machine, to
port YY on another (such as a web server behind a firewall).
Port redirec...
netscreen: not allowed to port forward port outside port < 1024 to one inside >= 1024?I'm using a netscreen-25 and it seems to be the case that when I try to
set up a port forward from virtual port 80 (outside) to port 8080
(inside) it won't let me:
"port number should be between 1024 and 32767, or default 1024"
.... and then it sets my port 80 to be 1024. Virtuals ports < 1024 are
not allowed for some reason....
I am doing the port forwarding by using the VIP (virtual IP) feature btw.
Why should there be such a limiation?
Is there any compromise possible?
alex
Alex Hunsley wrote:
> I'm using a netscreen-25 and it seems to be the case that when I
> try to set up a port forward from virtual port 80 (outside) to port
> 8080 (inside) it won't let me:
>
> "port number should be between 1024 and 32767, or default 1024"
>
> ... and then it sets my port 80 to be 1024. Virtuals ports < 1024
> are not allowed for some reason....
>
> I am doing the port forwarding by using the VIP (virtual IP)
> feature btw.
>
> Why should there be such a limiation?
> Is there any compromise possible?
>
> alex
Are you already using Port 80 with another policy or service for your NAT'ed
IP address?
Another good resource for netscreen issues is
www.netscreenforum.com
Not-My-Real-Name wrote:
> Alex Hunsley wrote:
>
>>I'm using a netscreen-25 and it seems to be the case that when I
>>try to set up a port forward from virtual port 80 (outside) to port
>>...
Question about port forwarding in windowsHello,
I am looking for a way to forward ports on my windows box and I would like
to know if there excists any particular software to do this (or does
windows itself conclude any tools)?
I am using Zonealarm and Symantec Client Firewall.
LoCusF <LoCusF@locusfmachina.dyndns.org> wrote in
news:Pine.CYG.4.58.0511011815440.2524@locusfmachina.dyndns.org:
> Hello,
>
> I am looking for a way to forward ports on my windows box and I would
> like to know if there excists any particular software to do this (or
> does windows itself conclude any tools)?
>
> I am using Zonealarm and Symantec Client Firewall.
>
Then you're going to have to set rules on those personal FW solutions to
open the required inbound ports. There is no port forwarding in those
solutions as those solutions are running on the machine at the machine
level and there is nothing to forward ports too. The Windows O/S, unless
you're using XP's FW or IPsec that's on the O/S and those solutions as
well would have to have rules set to open the required ports for inbound,
has nothing to do with port forwarding ports to an IP/machine that needs
the ports open. That would be in the case of a NAT router, FW appliance
or network host based FW running on a gateway computer in a LAN situation
being used where port forwarding would be done.
http://www.homenethelp.com/web/explain/port-forwarding-dmz.asp
Duane :)
...
Port Forwarding LRP QuestionsI've got a linux-based LRP firewall that I want to forward 12 ports to serve
on IRC. It is the latest Dachstein release from here:
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
Let's say I want to forward ports 5987-5999 to ports 5987-5999 on a machine
with a static IP address of 192.168.1.1 on the internal interface .
1) Is ipchains the best way to do it?
a) If so, what do I need to type to make it work?
b) Where do I type it?
2) If not ipchains, what then?
a) Same as above
b) Same as above
...
SSH Port Forwarding QuestionI am having a problem using OpenSSH_3.8.1p1 Debian 1:3.8.1p1-4,
OpenSSL 0.9.7d on the client and OpenSSH_3.7p1 for Solaris 7 on the
server.
I have port forwarded the default Oracle port from my local machine
through a bastion host to my Oracle machine like so:
ssh -L 1521:oracle_box:1521 username@bastion
And all works fine at first. I am doing some load testing on an
application and am trying to see how many instances I can run at one
time. Each instance of the application initiates its own connection
to the Oracle database through the SSH tunnel. This works great until
I get to 25 hosts and then I start seeing this error on the console of
the bastion host where I have ssh'd to:
channel 53: open failed: administratively prohibited: open failed
It appears there is some sort of hard limit that I have reached and I
am wondering if this is something I can change on the client side, the
server side, or whether it is hardcoded into either the server or
client and I'm out of luck. I do not have the luxury of simply
selecting another local port to forward because of the way the
application is configured so I'd really like to be able to get at
least 100 connections through per tunnel. I have tried this on 3
different Linux boxes, all with the same result.
The per-process limit on concurrent open file descriptors for sshd on the
server is probably set to 64; try increasing it.
--
Richard Silverman
res@qoxp.net
...
Linksys port forwarding questionHi!
I am running RH9 and want to setup a webserver. If I connect my
server to my cable modem it works fine.
However, I don't want the RH9 box connected directly to it. I want it
and other servers sitting behind my router.
I have several PCs connected to my router and all gain internet
access. But when I setup the port forwarding(port 6000 -> PC1,port
6001 -> PC2, etc) it does not work from the outside. Inside the
firewall it works fine.
When I check to see what the outside IP is(looking at status on
Linksys wireless router) I can type that IP in and specify a
particular port and voila I see a particular web server. As soon as
I go outside the firewall (from some other location in the world) and
try to use the IP, I cannot ping it, I cannot see it at all. I
disabled the DHCP server and all the PCs have static IP (inside). My
outside IP is usually good for quite a while.
What am I missing? As I mentioned when I hook up RH9 directly to the
cable modem it works but I want to use my router instead.
What needs to be setup or configured on my Linksys router(wireless) in
order to gain access from the outside?
Thanks
When you access the servers from the internet be sure that you are entering
in the correct address and port number. You have to use your public IP
address to access any of your computers. The router does the translation
and forward. Also you can only ping the public IP address, so you are in
effect pinging the router unless you have a machine s...
Beginner question, port forwardingHi,
I'm distributing Java app to SuSe 7.2
I have one problem, I need to receive UDP packets on port 67 (bootp)
on
Windows that's OK but on Linux I can't bind to the port <1024.
Is there a way to route packets from port 67 to some port > 1024 using
linux
IPtables or some other way, I tried several combinations with no
success.
Device that is sending UDPs is 10.254.254.100 and it is sending to
255.255.255.255, interface that have to receive UDPs is 10.254.254.1
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i 10.254.254.1 -p udp --dport 67 -j
REDIRECT --to-port 6700
iptables -t nat -A OUTPUT -p udp -d 10.254.254.1 --dport 67 -j
REDIRECT --to 6700
With tcpdump (tcpdump udp port 67) I can see that packets are coming
to the
port 67, but nothing to the port 6700.
Thanx
uk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm distributing Java app to SuSe 7.2
> I have one problem, I need to receive UDP packets on port 67 (bootp)
> on
> Windows that's OK but on Linux I can't bind to the port <1024.
Unless the process attempting this has root access / is run by root.
> Is there a way to route packets from port 67 to some port > 1024 using
> linux IPtables or some other way, I tried several combinations with no
> success.
Believe me - at least one "combination" will work ;-)
> Device that is sending UDPs is 10.254.254.100 and it is sending to
> 255.255.255.255
Why ?
> interface that have to receive UDPs is 10.254.254.1
Yes, but that doesn...
ssh port forwarding questionsFolks,
I am trying to setup X11 base working environment on my macbook (at
home). What I am trying to do is to login to my work unix machine, run
commands, bring up GUI's (on my macbook). I was told that SSH port
forwarding is best for this. (I am unix VNC, and it works great, but
problem is I end up using mouse lot; cant' easily switch between
windows on KDE..and on mac I can use all shortcuts to navigate
faster).
So here is what I have:
work machine: name.company.com (I use hostname to find out; not sure
how to get ip or full name, I am just assuming that domain is
comp...
Newbie Port Forwarding QuestionThanks to everyone in advance. I am stuck in the middle of a project
where there was an existing Cisco 1720 that looks like it had grown out
of control. I have no experience with cisco other than what I have
learned in the groups. I think what I need to do is basic, but I am
struggling. I need to forward all SMTP traffic to a specific ip
address. Can I just create an access list at the very beginning? Is
there anything special I need to do with the interfaces? Any help
would be very much appreciated.
Here is a little snippet of the code:
ip subnet-zero
no ip source-route
!
!
ip tftp source-interface FastEthernet0
ip domain name indy.local135.com
ip name-server 192.168.200.10
ip name-server 192.168.200.12
!
no ip cef
ip audit po max-events 100
ftp-server enable
!
!
username admin privilege 15 secret 5
username slefevre privilege 15 secret 5
!
!
!
interface FastEthernet0
description $ETH-LAN$
ip address 192.168.200.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip route-cache flow
speed auto
full-duplex
!
interface FastEthernet0.20
description DMZ Interface
encapsulation dot1Q 20
ip address 12.96.76.70 255.255.255.248
ip access-group sdm_fastethernet0.20_in in
ip helper-address 192.168.200.10
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
no snmp trap link-status
no cdp enable
!
interface Serial0
description T1(1.54M) to Internet
ip address 12.119.206.86 255.255.255.252
ip access-group sdm_serial0_in_test in
...
Ports for DB2 behind firewall / ssh port forwardhi newsgroup,
I'd like to connect to a remote DB2 Database V 8.2 using the "DB2
Steuerzentrale" (I guess it's called something like "DB2 management console"
in the English version). Since the database host is behind a firewall I
tried to communicate through ssh port forwarding.
Therefore, I run:
ssh -L 6789:remotename:6789 -L 50000:remotename:50000 -L
50001:remotename:50001 -L 523:remotename:523 remotename
Though the ssh connection is established, my "DB2 Steuerzentrale" won't
connect to localhost successfully and shows an error num...
Do I need port forwarding on 25 port to send messages?I'm using CDONTS.Newmail (It is using the local SMTP) in a contact
form on a web server(IIS) which is behind DMZ.
I am trying to figure out why it is not sending the messages.
The machine has private IP and port forwarding is set up for 80 port.
I don't need to receive, but only to send.
In this case - Do I need port forwarding on 25 port if I use the SMTP
for CDONTS.Newmail only.
Thank you in advance,
Rosica
"bu" <me@buto.net> wrote in message
news:9506ab65.0307161002.420d480d@posting.google.com...
| I'm using CDONTS.Newmail (It is using the local SMTP) in a contact
| form on a web server(IIS) which is behind DMZ.
|
| I am trying to figure out why it is not sending the messages.
| The machine has private IP and port forwarding is set up for 80 port.
|
| I don't need to receive, but only to send.
| In this case - Do I need port forwarding on 25 port if I use the SMTP
| for CDONTS.Newmail only.
|
| Thank you in advance,
| Rosica
no. the way broadband routers work, you only need to setup ports from the
WAN side. your local side has permissions to send.
ken k
"Ken Kauffman" <kkauffman@nospam.headfog.com> wrote in message
news:fygRa.7072$zd4.1834@lakeread02...
|
| "bu" <me@buto.net> wrote in message
| news:9506ab65.0307161002.420d480d@posting.google.com...
| | I'm using CDONTS.Newmail (It is using the local SMTP) in a contact
| | form on a web server(IIS) which is behind DMZ.
| |
| | I am trying ...
port tunneling over ssh (not port-forwarding in the traditional sense)Does anybody know of a way to do port forwarding over ssh not using the
standard ssh functionality, but rather by running a utility on the server
and using a special client that forwards data through the terminal session.
I think PPP and slirp would do the job, but I would prefer to have a
standalone client that exists solely to forward one (or several) ports,
rather than acting as my main network connection.
> Does anybody know of a way to do port forwarding over ssh not using the
> standard ssh functionality, but rather by running a utility on the server
> and using a special client that forwards data through the terminal session.
>
> I think PPP and slirp would do the job, but I would prefer to have a
> standalone client that exists solely to forward one (or several) ports,
> rather than acting as my main network connection.
I don't know of such a method, although it probably can be done. But I'm
having trouble understanding what the advantage is. You still have to run
an ssh client and ssh server. Then you want to add an additional client and
server that will communicate over the ssh connection, in order to forward
some ports. But the ssh session will already do this, so where's the
benefit?
Are you maybe thinking of automation? That is, you want to ports to be
forwarded automatically as soon as you boot or log in, without you having to
start an ssh client session? If so, then maybe autossh is what you want:
http://w...
iptables port forwardingwith the following rules:
iptables -A INPUT --protocol tcp --dport 2222 -j ACCEPT
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 2222 -j DNAT --to-destination 127.0.0.1:22
"ssh -p 2222 <host>" doesn't go through and nmap shows port 2222 as
being filtered (from within the DMZ). how can i open up the port?
thanks.
Jason wrote:
> with the following rules:
>
> iptables -A INPUT --protocol tcp --dport 2222 -j ACCEPT
> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 2222 -j DNAT --to-destination 127.0.0.1:22
>
> "ssh -p 2222 <host>" doesn't go through and nmap shows port 2222 as
> being filtered (from within the DMZ). how can i open up the port?
Change the INPUT rule to --dport 22 and it should work. The DNAT rule
changes the port in the PREROUTING table, and because of the way
the packets traverse the chains the table FILTER and the chain INPUT
goes after that, so the packet has destination port 22 when it hits
the INPUT rule.
> thanks.
Regards.
--
Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez
Director Tecnico de bgSEC
jkerouac@bgsec.com
bgSEC Seguridad y Consultoria de Sistemas Informaticos
http://www.bgsec.com
ESPA�A
The only people for me are the mad ones -- the ones who are mad to live,
mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time,
the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn
like fabulous yellow Roman candles.
-- Jack Kerouac, "On the R...
Port Forwarding -All ports shown as "Stealth"I am unable to get ourtside services to see my computer. I have an ADSL
modem/router configured as a "bridge" feeding into a wireless+4xethernet
router, with one ethernet port going to my computer, and the wireless port
going to my wife's laptop. We have never had full networking, since her
intersts and mine don't overlap.
I have port forwarding for Ports 80 (Web server) 25 (Mail Server) P2P and
VOIP. According to a scan at "Shields Up!", all the first 1056 ports come
up as stealth. My servers are not visible. EchoLink (a Ham program using
VOIP) can receive a station list, but can't connect to the test server (the
necessary ports have been forwarded.)
Any suggestions please? I rather suspect that it is due to having the modem
in two stages.
Doug.
--
How wonderful it is that nobody need wait a single moment before starting to
improve the world.
- Anne Frank.
On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:06:55 +1100, Doug Laidlaw rearranged some electrons
to form:
> I am unable to get ourtside services to see my computer. I have an ADSL
> modem/router configured as a "bridge" feeding into a wireless+4xethernet
> router, with one ethernet port going to my computer, and the wireless port
> going to my wife's laptop. We have never had full networking, since her
> intersts and mine don't overlap.
>
> I have port forwarding for Ports 80 (Web server) 25 (Mail Server) P2P and
> VOIP. According to a scan at "Sh...
PORT ForwardingHi all,
I'm newbie to Linux and now I'm working in PORT Forwarding in that,
I've two network cards in Linux PC
Configs are
eth0 :
IP :10.128.19.219
(connected with local network IP is 10.128.xx.xxx)
eth1:
IP : 192.128.10.1
(connected with private network PC and IP is 192.128.10.2)
Now I can transfer the http protocols,
But I want to communicate from 10.128.19.230 port no 1000 to
192.128.10.2 port no 2000
Is it possible?
How could I make it possible through Port Address Translation?
Suggest me example rule sets
Can anybody help me?
On Thu, 29 Nov 20...
port forwardingi have a linksys BEFSR41 router hooking up two computers both have win xp
(home) on them, i was having a problem with IRC and finally figured it out
somewhat, i had to forward some ports to get it working, but when i did this
i lost the use of the internet on the other computer, so now when i want to
use irc i have to make sure no one is going to use the internet on the other
computer and go into the routers setup and change the port forwarding while
i am using irc, and when i am done i have to change it back...anyone know
why i have to do this and how to make it so i dont have to do it...