gethostbyname_r not resolved

  • Follow


Hello -

I build an OSS program by using gsoap library which was delivered by
HP  and get an error says gethostbyname_r can not be resolved . It
seems this gsoap library was not built correctly at least it missed
the gethostbyname_r

Do you know how to solve this issue?  A choice might be to re-build
the whole gsoap library but I don't wanna do that.

--- see log here ---
External References Not Resolved to Any User/System Library:
Prg: ../bin/SoapTest -> gethostbyname_r (PROC)
INSPECT - Symbolic Debugger - T9673G10 - (21JUL2008)   System \Pxx
Copyright Hewlett Packard Company 1983,1985-1999,2000-2005
INSPECT  CALL
049,12,00473  SoapTest
#soap_gethost(soap*,const char*,in_addr*).#2695(stdsoap2_ck_cpp.cpp) +
%H8I
-SoapTest-

Thanks
will @laba
0
Reply cdyjldy (59) 4/13/2011 1:41:59 PM

On Apr 13, 6:41=A0am, "William, Lin" <cdyj...@msn.com> wrote:
> Hello -
>
> I build an OSS program by using gsoap library which was delivered by
> HP =A0and get an error says gethostbyname_r can not be resolved . It
> seems this gsoap library was not built correctly at least it missed
> the gethostbyname_r
>
> Do you know how to solve this issue? =A0A choice might be to re-build
> the whole gsoap library but I don't wanna do that.
>

If you're running H06.20 or earlier, you need to use the SPT library.
0
Reply redfloyd (276) 4/13/2011 4:11:16 PM


On 4=D4=C214=C8=D5, =C9=CF=CE=E712=CA=B111=B7=D6, red floyd <redfl...@gmail=
..com> wrote:
> On Apr 13, 6:41 am, "William, Lin" <cdyj...@msn.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello -
>
> > I build an OSS program by using gsoap library which was delivered by
> > HP  and get an error says gethostbyname_r can not be resolved . It
> > seems this gsoap library was not built correctly at least it missed
> > the gethostbyname_r
>
> > Do you know how to solve this issue?  A choice might be to re-build
> > the whole gsoap library but I don't wanna do that.
>
> If you're running H06.20 or earlier, you need to use the SPT library.

You are Awsome!!!! Thanks very much!

will @laba
0
Reply cdyjldy (59) 4/13/2011 4:21:44 PM

2 Replies
39 Views

(page loaded in 0.079 seconds)

Similiar Articles:

7/7/2012 10:30:27 AM


Reply: