Greetings!
I'm new to this group, hope some expert here might help me. Using
Acrobat 7 from CS2 for small scholarly publishing operations on various
computers, ranging from several iBook G4 1.2 GHz models running OS
10.4.x to one Intel iMac 2.8 GHz running Leopard. For the last year or
two we've noticed horribly slow performance when inserting or replacing
pages in a pdf file. Things seem to go expeditiously, then we get a
message at the bottom saying "Consolidating duplicate fonts", and this
can go on for an hour or more. This despite the fact that our pdf files
don't seem unusually large or complex. They are almost entirely text,
with few font changes, usually two or three fonts used within an entire
book.
A printer has complained that they experience the same problem in
working with our files. The printer says our files are created at too
high a dpi resolution, and that explains the problem. My intuition tells
me this shouldn't be true, since we are using vector fonts: why would
this matter unless everything was getting rasterized? We haven't noticed
that this is connected with any particular font or fonts. We use a
mixture of Adobe Type 1 fonts and a couple of Windows .ttf fonts (most
frequently Palatino Linotype). If it matters, my Distiller 7 job
settings used by default on all these computers are Acrobat 3 (PDF 1.2)
compatibility, 2400 dpi resolution, embel all fonts, and subset for less
than 100%. Perhaps these need to be tweaked? BTW our main printer has
old software controlling their presses, and they want us to save into
the earliest possible version of Acrobat, which is why we use Acrobat
3.0 compatibility.
We are at a loss, but this impacts on our productivity when assembling
pdfs. Any informed advice would be welcome. I'm going to try to post
this at some Adobe forum, assuming I can figure out where is
appropriate. I have a second question (assumed to be unrelated, but who
knows) which I will ask in a separate posting.
TIA
George
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
George
|
12/12/2008 10:04:46 AM |
|
George Nospam wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> I'm new to this group, hope some expert here might help me. Using
> Acrobat 7 from CS2 for small scholarly publishing operations on various
> computers, ranging from several iBook G4 1.2 GHz models running OS
> 10.4.x to one Intel iMac 2.8 GHz running Leopard. For the last year or
> two we've noticed horribly slow performance when inserting or replacing
> pages in a pdf file. Things seem to go expeditiously, then we get a
> message at the bottom saying "Consolidating duplicate fonts", and this
> can go on for an hour or more. This despite the fact that our pdf files
> don't seem unusually large or complex. They are almost entirely text,
> with few font changes, usually two or three fonts used within an entire
> book.
>
> A printer has complained that they experience the same problem in
> working with our files. The printer says our files are created at too
> high a dpi resolution, and that explains the problem. My intuition tells
> me this shouldn't be true, since we are using vector fonts: why would
> this matter unless everything was getting rasterized? We haven't noticed
> that this is connected with any particular font or fonts. We use a
> mixture of Adobe Type 1 fonts and a couple of Windows .ttf fonts (most
> frequently Palatino Linotype). If it matters, my Distiller 7 job
> settings used by default on all these computers are Acrobat 3 (PDF 1.2)
> compatibility, 2400 dpi resolution, embel all fonts, and subset for less
> than 100%. Perhaps these need to be tweaked? BTW our main printer has
> old software controlling their presses, and they want us to save into
> the earliest possible version of Acrobat, which is why we use Acrobat
> 3.0 compatibility.
>
> We are at a loss, but this impacts on our productivity when assembling
> pdfs. Any informed advice would be welcome. I'm going to try to post
> this at some Adobe forum, assuming I can figure out where is
> appropriate. I have a second question (assumed to be unrelated, but who
> knows) which I will ask in a separate posting.
A recent thread on the FOP mailing list may have your answer.
http://www.mail-archive.com/fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org/msg11818.html
BugBear
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
bugbear
|
12/12/2008 10:06:18 AM
|
|
Hello,
without seeing the files it seems quite impossible to give any useful
hint. Maybe you put some of these problematic files on some ftp server
and give us the URL, so someone can maybe tell you, what might be the
reason.
You should also tell us, which programs and environments you use to
create and modify the files.
Best regards
Alois
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Alois
|
12/12/2008 10:09:05 AM
|
|
|
2 Replies
397 Views
(page loaded in 0.065 seconds)
|