f



VSI Fax 4.1.1 and AIX 5.2.2

We are upgrading from AIX 4.3.3 to 5.2.2, and need to find out if the
version of vsi fax will (has any chance) of working on the higher
level os. I talked to Customer service at Esher (who now owns vsi fax)
and they said that it was not supported and had not been tested on
5.2.2. They then suggested buying the newer version. We will most
likely not be using VSI fax by the end of the year, so we would prefer
not to buy something to use for only a couple of months. So, has
anyone had any success using vsi fax 4.1.1 on aix 5.2.2 ?

The specific version/build is  version 4.1.1 build 266

thanks,
0
2/19/2004 10:58:47 PM
comp.unix.aix 10963 articles. 1 followers. drkirkby (98) is leader. Post Follow

0 Replies
948 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 28

Reply:

Similar Artilces:

Installing TOMCAT 4.1 (or higher) on AIX 5.1/5.2 #2
Hi, I am searching for information on installing TOMCAT 4.1 (or higher) on AIX 5.1/5.2 platform. Is it possible? Regards ...

Binary compatibility of AIX 4.2.1 app on AIX 5.2
I have a legacy application that works on AIX 4.2.1 and as we are upgrading the hardware to a box running AIX 5.2, I'm wondering about the binary compatability of the 2 AIX versions as I think the source code has disappeared. Any advice on what to do if it doesn't work? Am I screwed? Tom. Tom Brehony wrote: > I have a legacy application that works on AIX 4.2.1 and as we are upgrading > the hardware > to a box running AIX 5.2, I'm wondering about the binary compatability of > the 2 AIX > versions as I think the source code has disappeared. You chances are very good unless "non-standard" practices have been used. 4.2.1 is too early for 64-bit support so that is not a worry. So as long as the app is not compiled for a specific processor or includes kernel extensions or is timing-dependant, then you should be fine. Having said which, it would be nice to tell what -qarch= value was supplied when it was compiled. Darned if I can remember how to do that though. Anyone care to remind me? > Any advice on what to do if it doesn't work? Am I screwed? Well, yes, except you could continue to run on 4.2.1 until the hardware which will run it evaporates. After all, you waited this long ... Simon Marchese <sjm_news@yahoo.co.uk> writes: > as long as the app is not compiled for a specific processor or > includes kernel extensions or is timing-dependant and as long as it was dynamically linked against libc.a(shr.o) ....

KRB5 1.5 or 1.6 compiled on AIX 5.2/5.3 #2
I have seen several emails from different people over the last few months on trying to get KRB5 1.5 or later to compile on AIX 5.x. And no responses that fix the problem. I have had the same problem and can only presume that Kerberos is no longer supported on AIX. Is this the case? No Kerberos on AIX? It just won't compile anymore with the changes to shared libraries. ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos >>>>> "Grant," == Grant, Martin <Martin.Grant@fmr.com> writes: Grant,> I have seen several emails from different people over the Grant,> last few months on trying to get KRB5 1.5 or later to Grant,> compile on AIX 5.x. And no responses that fix the Grant,> problem. I have had the same problem and can only presume Grant,> that Kerberos is no longer supported on AIX. Is this the Grant,> case? No Kerberos on AIX? It just won't compile anymore Grant,> with the changes to shared libraries. We no longer run AIX tests. Our donated AIX box was very old and slow, and its disk was in the process of dieing. If there's no one out there in the Kerberos development community who cares enough about AIX to get the betas, test them and send bug fixes, then yes, AIX support is going to be fairly bad. Kerberos is an open-source product; if you want it to work better on your pl...

RE: KRB5 1.5 or 1.6 compiled on AIX 5.2/5.3 #2
Exact same errors specifying --without-tcl. I removed the config.cache, config.log, and etc the reran configure. From my configure line - ../configure --prefix=/usr/local/kerberos --enable-dns-for-realm --without-tcl --with-vague-errors Then after make... making all in lib/rpc/unit-test... Target "all" is up to date. cc -I../../../include -I./../../../include -I. -DKRB5_DEPRECATED=1 -DKRB5_PRIVATE=1 -g -qhalt=e -O _THREAD_SAFE -c client.c cc -I../../../include -I./../../../include -I. -DKRB5_DEPRECATED=1 -DKRB5_PRIVATE=1 -g -qhalt=e -O _THREAD_SAFE -c rpc_test_clnt.c cc -L../../../lib -blibpath:/usr/local/kerberos/lib::/usr/lib:/lib -g -qhalt=e -O -D_THREAD_SAFE -o c nt client.o rpc_test_clnt.o -lgssrpc -lgssapi_krb5 -lkrb5 -lk5crypto -lcom_err -lkrb5support -lpthreads ld: 0706-006 Cannot find or open library file: -l k5crypto ld:open(): A file or directory in the path name does not exist. ld: 0706-006 Cannot find or open library file: -l com_err ld:open(): A file or directory in the path name does not exist. ld: 0706-006 Cannot find or open library file: -l krb5support ld:open(): A file or directory in the path name does not exist. make: 1254-004 The error code from the last command is 255. Stop. make: 1254-004 The error code from the last command is 1. Stop. make: 1254-004 The error code from the last command is 1. Stop. make: 1254-004 The error code from the last command is 1. Stop. Any ot...

RE: KRB5 1.4 vs. KRB5 1.3.6 on AIX 5.2 #2
Downloaded KRB5 1.4.1 and the installation worked great with GCC and AIX make. None of the problems that were encountered with 1.4.0 and the unbalanced "(". The problem with: /usr/local/kerberos/bin/kinit -V kinit(v5): Cannot resolve network address for KDC in requested realm while getting initial credentials still exist. If I force it to version 4 KRB it seems to work with the krb5.conf: /usr/local/kerberos/bin/kinit -4 xxxxxxx Password for xxxxxx@xxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx: kinit(v4): Can't send request (send_to_kdc) The krb5.conf file is the same file that worked with the 1.3.6 version of KRB5. It does not seem to work with KRB 1.4 or 1.4.1. Any one having similar problems or solutions ? Thanks, Lamar -----Original Message----- From: Saxon, Lamar Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 11:08 AM To: 'Tom Yu' Cc: kerberos@mit.edu Subject: RE: KRB5 1.4 vs. KRB5 1.3.6 on AIX 5.2 The compile with CC works with no issues. The other issue still remains. "Cannot resolve network address for KDC in requested realm while getting initial credentials" I tried kinit with the -k and verbose; but not with a password. I will post the results once I get it accomplished. Thanks, Lamar -----Original Message----- From: Tom Yu [mailto:tlyu@MIT.EDU] Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 2:18 PM To: Saxon, Lamar Cc: kerberos@mit.edu Subject: Re: KRB5 1.4 vs. KRB5 1.3.6 on AIX 5.2 >>>>> "Lamar" == <Lamar.Saxon@americredit.com> writes: La...

Need to take mksysb backup of AIX 5.2 & 5.1 on AIX 5.1 Server.
Hi All Need docmented notes of step by step installing NIM Server on AIX 5.1 Server. Send me also documented notes on installing the NIM client for Aix 5.2 & 5.1. You can send the docs to prsanwal@gmail.com mail account. Awaiting your quick response. Warm Regards Prateek S How about go search IBM's web site and use the man pages... then if you get stuck, come back here and ask for help... We're not here to do your job for you. seriously! jeez prateek... have a little tact man! you want us to find you a bunch of documentation and mail it to you? and quickly? come on dude... show a little initiative... at least TRY to figure it out by yourself first, and evidence that by posting what you have tried and what happened. i know man pages suck ass (it honestly seems sometimes like they're TRYing to be vague and indirect sometimes). and i know ibm's website is ridiculously, monumentaly unorganized. but shit man, have you have heard of google? or askjeeves? i just searched for "installing NIM server on AIX" on google and found like 12,000 results! i know you come from a different culture where people may act a bit more... direct... in the workplace, but when you post a post like that, where you obviously havent even tried to find out yourself, you want people to find you documentation and EMAIL it to you, and you tell them to be QUICK? shit dude... not really how it works around here. btw- no one can see your email address in case you didnt know...

Looking for AIX 4.1.2 -> 4.1.5
Hi, Does anyone have AIX version between 4.1.2 - 4.1.5 for sale? I am looking for these versions because I intend to install it onto PowerPC thinkpad and these versions should be comaptible with it. You can contact me at tero.kaarlela at kotinet.com Tero Kaarlela ...

AIX 4.1.2 -> 4.1.5 wanted
Hi, I would like to buy AIX version between 4.1.2 and 4.1.5. On original CD's. If someone has these please inform me at. tero dot kaarlela at kotinet dot com Tero Tero Kaarlela schrieb: > Hi, > > I would like to buy AIX version between 4.1.2 and 4.1.5. On original > CD's. If someone has these please inform me at. > > > tero dot kaarlela at kotinet dot com > > > Tero Somewhere I have original 4.x-Update CDs. Tomorrow I will send you more infos by email. Andreas Kohl Tero Kaarlela schrieb: > I would like to buy AIX version between 4.1.2 and 4.1.5. On original > CD's. If someone has these please inform me at. Look into your mailbox. -- Uli Tero Kaarlela wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to buy AIX version between 4.1.2 and 4.1.5. On original > CD's. If someone has these please inform me at. > > > tero dot kaarlela at kotinet dot com > > > Tero Thanks for all who helped me. Now I finally found what I needed: AIX for my thinkpad. Tero ...

Installing TOMCAT 4.1 (or higher) on AIX 5.1/5.2
Hi, I am searching for information on installing TOMCAT 4.1 (or higher) on AIX 5.1/5.2 platform. Is it possible? Regards Yes, it works. Follow the installation instruction on tomcat web site. You might have issues with running stanalone Tomcat/SSL server on AIX due to the conflicts in JDK implementations used on AIX and the one to develop Tomcat ( Sun and IBM aren't play nice in there )... Other than that -- works just fine. Thx a lot for your reply. Can Tomcat use AIX's Java platform ? Is it mandatory to install SUN's JDK on AIX ? In this last case, would you please tell me where I can download sun's jdk for AIX. Thx again, Best Regards Yes, tomcat will use AIX JDK with no problem... till you decided to use Tomcat/SSL as stanalone server ( so, no other HTTP servers out there )... See how-to SSL on tomcat web site for more details. Begining with Java 1.4.1 Sun finaly get JSSE included in the release, but IBM did it few years ago in their JDK on AIX, so you will not find Sun JSSE on AIX platform in Java 1.4.x, but Tomcat/SSL needs it... I don't know it would be resolved any time soon. So, if you can use Tomcat without SSL or have Apache/SSL/Tomcat you should be just fine . Thank you very much for these details. Regards Ok, I've installed jakarta-tomcat-4.1.31.tar.gz on a AIX 5.2 system. I've created a 'tomcat' user and added the following information to his ..profile : export JAVA_HOME=/usr/java14 export CLASSPATH=/usr/j...

[ace-users] Tests failed : ACE 5.5.2 - AIX 5.3
Hi, My first mail before my message in the group failed (my subscription was not activated). The PRF below describes my problems. I can compile and link but several ACE's tests fail. I only use ACE library and only compile it by cd'ing in the ace directory before running make. I already made some fixes described below to compile and to link the library. I'm not abble to interpret the faild tests to identify the problem source or area. I didn't find the scoreboard before my mail. I see that several tests fails for all compilations on AIX. I try to reassure myself by looking these results, it's not only for my configuration. But it's a daily build with last development version. For the 5.5.2 stable version they should probably not fail ? Regards, PO Houot. ACE VERSION: 5.5.2 HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: bash-3.00$ uname -a AIX localhost 3 5 0040983B4C00 unknown unknown AIX bash-3.00$ oslevel -r 5300-05 TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST: Same as host COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL): bash-3.00$ g++ -v Using built-in specs. Target: powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0 Configured with: ../gcc-4.1.1/configure --disable-nls Thread model: aix gcc version 4.1.1 This compiler is installed from packages provided by UCLA AIX Software library THE $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h FILE : bash-3.00$ more $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h #include "ace/config-aix-5.x.h" T...

Does 4/2/2= (4/2)/2 =1 OR = 4/(2/2)=4
I don't have matlab and I am trying to translate some simple matlab code. Does 4/2/2 = (4/2)/2 = 1 or 4/2/2 = 4/(2/2) = 4 On 9/11/2012 9:43 AM, sarah.englander@gmail.com wrote: > I don't have matlab and I am trying to translate some simple matlab code. > > Does 4/2/2 = (4/2)/2 = 1 yes. At a given precedence level (and obviously two of the same operators are the same level) evaluation proceeds from LtoR. ....snip... <http://www.mathworks.com/help/techdoc/matlab_prog/f0-40063.html#f0-38155> -- dpb <none@non.net> wrote in message <k2njh1$jes$1@speranza.aioe.org>... > On 9/11/2012 9:43 AM, sarah.englander@gmail.com wrote: > > I don't have matlab and I am trying to translate some simple matlab code. > > > > Does 4/2/2 = (4/2)/2 = 1 > > yes. At a given precedence level (and obviously two of the same > operators are the same level) evaluation proceeds from LtoR. > > ...snip... > > <http://www.mathworks.com/help/techdoc/matlab_prog/f0-40063.html#f0-38155> > > -- There are a few thing you need to understand: 1. You need to get matlab in order to translate the simple code 2. You should define your parameters as in what is the expected output of your search based on the equations used: Is it : a) 4/2/2 b) (4/2/2) On 9/11/2012 11:13 PM, Salvinder wrote: .. > There are a few thing you need to understand: > 1. ...

moving xlc 5.0.1 on aix 4.3 to aix 5.2?
We are upgrading our B50 with AIX 4.3.3 to AIX 5.2 We currently use C for AIX xlc 5.0.1 on AIX 4.3.3. I remember reading xlc 5.0.2 is required to be used for AIX 5.2. Does this mean we have to purchase a new compiler, or is there an upgrade available. thank you sol sol gongola wrote: > We are upgrading our B50 with AIX 4.3.3 to AIX 5.2 > We currently use C for AIX xlc 5.0.1 on AIX 4.3.3. > > I remember reading xlc 5.0.2 is required to be used for > AIX 5.2. Does this mean we have to purchase a new > compiler, or is there an upgrade available. Just install updates. You should be at a 5.0.2.9 compiler level anyway, although that version is out of support. The compiler is the compiler, and if you've got a version 5 license, it should be good on any release of AIX, AFAIK. YMMV, though. -- Gary R. Hook / AIX PartnerWorld for Developers / These opinions are MINE ________________________________________________________________________ ...

gcc 4.1.1 on AIX 5.2
How long does it take to compiler gcc 4.1.1 on a decent AIX 5.2 ? Compiling GCC 4.1.1 has been taking days ( more than 72 hours) on my machine and its still compiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiling. My machine is relatively less loaded and the only process running is compiling GCC. I'm having to compile GCC 4.1.1 because to be able to use libstdc++, one needs to compile gcc with some assembler patches on the machine (as per http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#x-ibm-aix) My machine shows oslevel -r as 5200-04, which according to http://techsupport.services.ibm.com/ already has all the required fixes. Any hints on what is wrong with my machine?? Thanks in advance! Ravindra. In article <1166104996.447605.120150@l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com>, "Ravindra" <ravindra.rajaram@gmail.com> writes: > How long does it take to compiler gcc 4.1.1 on a decent AIX 5.2 ? I think you can download it precompiled from http://aixpdslib.seas.ucla.edu/packages/gcc.html Ravindra wrote: > How long does it take to compiler gcc 4.1.1 on a decent AIX 5.2 ? > Compiling GCC 4.1.1 has been taking days ( more than 72 hours) on my > machine and its still compiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiling. > My machine is relatively less loaded and the only process running is > compiling GCC. > I'm having to compile GCC 4.1.1 because to be able to use libstdc++, > one needs to compile gcc with some assembler patches on the machine (as > per http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specif...

AIX 4.1.5 for Clients vs. regular AIX 4.1.5
Hi, My IBM RS/6000 Notebook 860 portable workstation was originally packaged with IBM AIX Version 4.1.5 for Clients. Does anybody know the difference with the regular 4.1.5? Many thanks, Emeric -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG Emeric Maschino wrote: > Hi, > > My IBM RS/6000 Notebook 860 portable workstation was originally packaged > with IBM AIX Version 4.1.5 for Clients. Does anybody know the difference > with the regular 4.1.5? > > Many thanks, > > Emeric > > > -- > Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG can't remember for sure, I also had an Aix portable I seem to recall the difference being it lacked some server daemons, required less disk space and less memory than the "Server" versions. I think the early days of 4.2 also had a "clients" and "server" editions. Here is a link to additional info on your machine: http://www.nand.net/~rjhawkin/ppc850tp/IBM_Offering_for_860.html ...

[tao-users] The differences between TAO 1.4.1.2 and 1.5.1.0 #2
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C74A75.80E5ABB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello all, =20 Could someone tell me where can I find a document which describes about the differences between TAO 1.4.1.2 and 1.5.1.0? =20 Thanks with regards, Shi Lei ------_=_NextPart_001_01C74A75.80E5ABB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Dus-ascii"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.3020" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D604250205-07022007>Hello=20 all,</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20 class=3D604250205-07022007></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D604250205-07022007>Could = someone tell=20 me where can I find a document which describes about the differences = between TAO=20 1.4.1.2 and 1.5.1.0?</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20 class=3D604250205-07022007></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV> <DI...

Printing 2^1, 2^2, 2^3, 2^4 and 2^5
Hi, When I use a while loop, the output is: 2 4 8 16 32, as desired: <?php $c=1; while($c<=5) { $d = newpow(2, $c); print "$d "; $c++; } function newpow($base, $power) { // statements... } ?> The But when I use a for loop, the output is: 64: <?php for($c=1; $c<=5; $c++); { $d = newpow(2, $c); print "$d "; } function newpow($base, $power) { // statements... } ?> Why is this?? Many thanks, Michael mejpark wrote: > When I use a while loop, the output is: 2 4 8 16 32, as desired: [...] > The But when I use a for loop, the output is: 64: > > <?php > > for($c=1; $c<=5; $c++); Here your loop ended right at the ; After the loop comes this: > { > $d = newpow(2, $c); > print "$d "; > } Heiko -- http://portal.richler.de/ Namensportal zu Richler http://www.richler.de/ Heiko Richler: Computer - Know How! http://www.richler.info/ private Homepage On 18 Mar, 11:02, Heiko Richler <heiko-rich...@nefkom.net> wrote: > mejpark wrote: > > When I use a while loop, the output is: 2 4 8 16 32, as desired: > [...] > > The But when I use a for loop, the output is: 64: > > > <?php > > > for($c=1; $c<=5; $c++); > > Here your loop ended right at the ; > > After the loop comes this: > > > { > > $d = newpow(2, $c); > > print "$d "; > > } > > Heiko > > --http://portal.richler.d...

How to integrate gcc 3.4.4 to Tornado 2.2.1 for VxWorks 5.5.1
Hi, all. Did anybody tried to integrate the gcc 3.4.4 to Tornado 2.2.1, whose native compiler is gcc 2.96 ? I know that the gcc 3.4.4 is delivered as part of Workbench IDE with VxWorks 6.x and generally it is supported by WindRiver. If you tried and, hopefully, succeeded to integrate the compiler, please outline the procedure or, alternatively, point me to a resource explaining this issue. If you tried and not succeeded, please give me an indication - whether, in your opinion, it is possible at all. We have an application written under VxWorks 5.5.1 with Tornado 2.2.1 and now we trying to e...

Any differences between the Korn shell on Aix 4.2.1 and 5.2?
Can anyone tell me if there are any differences (major or otherwise) between the Korn Shell in AIX 4.2.1 and 5.2? I'm porting an application which uses alot of shell scripts between 4.2.1 and 5.2, and I'm wondering if I will have any problems with them. Tom. yes there are. posix compliance is one. for one thing, if you do numerical manipulation within your scripts, that may break if it is not done in a compliant way. Tom Brehony wrote: > Can anyone tell me if there are any differences (major or otherwise) > between the Korn Shell in AIX 4.2.1 and 5.2? > > I'm porting an application which uses alot of shell scripts between > 4.2.1 and 5.2, and I'm wondering if I will have any problems with > them. > > Tom. <aix@mail.com> wrote in message news:1109778140.664284.152740@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > yes there are. > posix compliance is one. > for one thing, if you do numerical manipulation within your scripts, > that may break if it is not done in a compliant way. > Tom Brehony wrote: >> Can anyone tell me if there are any differences (major or otherwise) >> between the Korn Shell in AIX 4.2.1 and 5.2? >> >> I'm porting an application which uses alot of shell scripts between >> 4.2.1 and 5.2, and I'm wondering if I will have any problems with >> them. >> >> Tom. > Can you give me an example of the type of numeric manipulation you are talking about...

problem with VisiBroker 5.2 with java 1.4.1 on AIX
There is small CORBA server. It works with VisiBroker 5.2, java 1.3.1 on AIX 5. After migration to java 1.4.1 server doesn't work. Exeption occuars in ORB.init method: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: sun/security/provider/Sun at java.lang.Class.forName1(Native Method) at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:173) at com.inprise.vbroker.orb.ORB.installServiceCollection(ORB.java:1257) at com.inprise.vbroker.orb.ORB.installServices(ORB.java:1298) at com.inprise.vbroker.orb.ORB.initialize(ORB.java:1089) at com.inprise.vbroker.orb.ORB.se...

RE: Kerberos 5 v1.5.1 on AIX 5.2 or AIX 5.3
Believe it or not; both solutions seem to work and compilation succeeds ! #define GET_HOST_BY_NAME(NAME, HP, ERR, TMP) \ { \ (HP) = (gethostbyname_r((NAME), &TMP.ent, &TMP.data) \ ? 0 \ : &TMP.data); \ (ERR) = h_errno; \ } Worked and so did... #define GET_HOST_BY_NAME(NAME, HP, ERR, TMP) \ { \ struct hostent my_h_ent; \ (HP) = (gethostbyname_r((NAME), &TMP.ent, &TMP.data) \ ? 0 \ : &my_h_ent); \ (ERR) = h_errno; \ } Thanks for the help ! I will continue testing with my current install base on AIX. I really appreciate the rapid responses and solutions ! Lamar -----Original Message----- From: Ken Raeburn [mailto:raeburn@MIT.EDU] Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 5:13 PM To: Marcus Watts Cc: Saxon, Lamar; kerberos@mit.edu Subject: Re: Kerberos 5 v1.5.1 on AIX 5.2 or AIX 5.3 On Sep 18, 2006, at 17:56, Marcus Watts wrote: > Lamar.Saxon@americredit.com writes: > ... >> making all in util... >> making all in util/support... >> cc -I../../include -...

Newbie question; why (cons (list 1 2) (list 3 4)) is ((1 2) 3 4) and not ((1 2) (3 4))
Hi, I just started to learn LISP, and stumbled in SICP upon (cons (list 1 2) (list 3 4)) is evaluated to ((1 2) 3 4) I do not understand why this is not: ((1 2) (3 4)) because (cdr (cons (list 1 2) (list 3 4))) is (3 4) and (car (cons (list 1 2) (list 3 4))) is (1 2) Is there a logical explanation? Thank you for your patience. -- Greg Out of order, gregor <gregor@ediwo.com> writes: > Is there a logical explanation? Yes. > I just started to learn LISP, and stumbled in SICP upon But first, let's talk about LISP, Lisp, Scheme and Common Lisp. LISP is the name of the programming language invented in 1959 by John McCarthy and of the first program implementing it written amongst other by Steve Russel, one of his students. LISP 1.5 is a segueing version of that same program dating about 1962 that had some distribution. Then various lisp languages were developed at various places by various teams. Names such as MacLisp, InterLisp, LeLisp, StandardLisp, vLisp, Lisp Machine Lisp, Scheme, GNU Emacs Lisp, etc. It was quite a mess, and people had a hard time sharing programs. So they talked and designed and wrote and voted and produced the ANSI Common Lisp standard (in the USA), meanwhile in Europe they produced the ISO Lisp standard. Nowadays, almost all the other lisps are "dead", with only scheme (current version r5rs, r7r...

aix 5.2 /dev/random gpg 1.2.2
hello all, I was wondering if any of you guys have used the gpg 1.2.2 with aix 5.2. I tried to generate keys but the problem is /dev/random which gives me the following errors. Not enough random bytes available. Please do some other work to give the OS a chance to collect more entropy! (Need 120 more bytes) and hangs. anybody encountered this problem? thanks! melissa melissa_benkyo wrote: > hello all, > > I was wondering if any of you guys have used the gpg 1.2.2 with aix > 5.2. I tried to generate keys but the problem is /dev/random which > gives me the following errors. > > Not enough random bytes available. Please do some other work to give > the OS a chance to collect more entropy! (Need 120 more bytes) > > and hangs. anybody encountered this problem? > > thanks! > > melissa Use /dev/urandom, or else you need more chaos in your job. Here's an explanation. http://www.gsp.com/cgi-bin/man.cgi?section=4&topic=urandom -- Jason ultimately this is telling you that /dev/random needs more data before it can produce random data for you. i believe /dev/random needs at least 8m of entropy before it gives you a result....the answer is to "do more work" i.e. make the server busier. if you need info immediately use /dev/urandom as this hasnt got the data requirement of /dev/random, although the random data you receive will not be "as" random ... markbwilkinson@hotmail.com (Mark Wilkinson) wrote i...

RE: KRB5 1.5 or 1.6 compiled on AIX 5.2/5.3 #5
Phil, Tested on AIX 5.3 TL05 SP4 with XLC++/XLC 8.0 and worked great ! I will be testing on AIX 5.2 TL09 SP3 and AIX 4.3 ML11 here shortly... Thanks for getting this figured out ! Also, appreciate the help from Sam and Martin who were working on it too... Lamar -----Original Message----- From: Phil Pishioneri [mailto:pgp@psu.edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 6:35 PM To: Saxon, Lamar Cc: kerberos@mit.edu Subject: Re: KRB5 1.5 or 1.6 compiled on AIX 5.2/5.3 I've gotten 1.5.x and 1.6 to build and run on AIX 5.2 (domain referral in 1.6 works nicely). So far I have only tested the client commands: klist, kvno, kinit, kdestroy. No 3rd party software tested yet, either. This was done with the IBM VisualAge C++ Professional / C for AIX Compiler, Version 6. The one major change: add LDFLAGS="-brtl" to configure. My configure line was (prefix edited): ./configure --without-krb4 --prefix=... CC=cc LDFLAGS=-brtl There was one problem during the 1.{5,6} builds (1.5 has a bug that's been documented already), it failed in making all in plugins/kdb/db2/libdb2/test... with ld: 0706-006 Cannot find or open library file: -l db ld:open(): A file or directory in the path name does not exist. my quick&dirty fix for that was (starting in .../krb5-1.6/src/): cd lib ln -s ../plugins/kdb/db2/libdb2/libdb.so.1.1 libdb.so.1.1 ln -s libdb.so.1.1 libdb.so -Phil Privileged and Confidential. This e-mail, and any attac...

convert String "1;2;3;4;5;" to Array [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
I'm trying to convert a String of numbers that are separated by semicolons to an Array---totally for fun, to stretch my ruby understanding, fyi. I use the Array in a while loop which does work when the Array looks like = [1,2,3,4,5,...]---so that part is working. But I want to use ruby to convert a String = "1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8;9;10" into an Array [1,2,3,4,5,...] so that I can use these values. I've tried many a method, but can't seem to get the desired result; I've tried gsub(/\;/, ","), eval (), and others. ########## raw_data = "1;2;3...

Web resources about - VSI Fax 4.1.1 and AIX 5.2.2 - comp.unix.aix

Midday Movers: STJ, VSI, GNC & More - US Business Blog - CNBC
Take a look at some of Wednesday's midday movers:

Pure Storage Unveils New All-Flash Packages for VDI, VSI
New reference architectures, which can mix and match other brands of storage componentry, are for virtual-server and virtual-desktop deployments. ...

Phoenix FC shuts out VSI Tampa in home debut
Phoenix FC shuts out VSI Tampa Bay FC 1-0 in franchise's home opener at Sun Devil Soccer Stadium.

Earnings Boost Stocks; Fossil Soars, Vitamin Shoppe Rises FOSL KORS VSI - Investors.com
Earnings news was the central attraction Tuesday, driving stocks to early gains in strong trade.

VSI to Enhance Royal Danish Air Force's F-16 Night-Attack Capability
FORT WORTH, Texas, Sept. 27, 2012 /PRNewswire/ VSI to Enhance Royal Danish Air Force's F-16 Night-Attack Capability. RDAF becomes VSI's first ...

Helmet-mounted display - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A helmet-mounted display (HMountD - pronounced "H-mount-D") is a device used in some modern aircraft, especially combat aircraft. HMDs project ...

Gem-search/Gemstone-search
Online-search for faceted single gems, gemstone-pairs and gemstone-lots.

Home, Oxford University Press
OUP Worldwide Help & Advice Annual Report Contact Us Customer Service Distribution Services FAQs Sales & Product Support Publishing with Oxford ...

Greater Victoria Public Library
Did you know your Library Card provides you access to online databases, as well as borrowing privileges and access to all of our other services? ...

Today’s Best Market Rumors (8/23/2012) AMR Merger
Updated throughout the day on the 24/7 Wall St. Wire. Mexico billionaire Carlos Slim may use his America Movil to buy into Poland telecom firm ...

Resources last updated: 3/26/2016 11:34:01 PM