Upgrade from 3.3 to 3.4 with bsd.rd ??
I'd like to upgrade my box the bsd.rd way as i did before (i have no
removable media attached to this little server now).
I understand there is a way to use the new image even with the a.out ->
ELF change, but i really can't find how..
Can someone give me a hint on this?
Hope not to have to go plug a cd-rom in this condemnend area! ;)
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Krech wrote:
> I'd like to upgrade my box the bsd.rd way as i did before (i have no
> removable media attached to this little server now).
> I understand there...upgrade 4.3.2. -> 4.3.3
I need to update from 220.127.116.11 to 4.3.3.x
IBM doesn't seem to support 4.3.2 any longer. All maintenances are only
available for >= 4.3.3.x
Does anybody know where to get the upgrade package files?
mgrd <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message news:<c6bis3$a18mb$1@ID-188896.news.uni-berlin.de>...
> I need to update from 18.104.22.168 to 4.3.3.x
> IBM doesn't seem to support 4.3.2 any longer. All maintenances are only
> available for >= 4.3.3.x
> Does anybody know where to get the upgrade package files?
All you need is a copy of the AIX 4.3.3 CDs. Can your busin...[ace-users] ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3)
[Apologies if this shows up twice, there was a mailer error with my first attempt to post]
I found the same problem reported recently on the mailing list
("compiling ACE under Fedora core 3", March 1st) but no resolution was
reported there, so I thought I'd post a full description here.
ACE VERSION: 5.4
HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM: AIX 5.1
...[ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3)
> Well, the definition of "production release" for ACE is a bit murky
for the canonical definition of terms. If there's something unclear
there please let me know and I'll fixit.
> The developers on this list (almost) always recommend using the
> latest package, which is typically labeled a "beta release".
Right, the reason we do that is because the "latest release" (which is
most commonly a beta release) is the on...Is there any difference of g++ 3.4.3 and g++ 3.3.4 ?
HI, my source code was compiled ok in g++ 3.3.4 . But when I try to
use 3.4.3 to compile, I get the following error:
Utility.h: In constructor `Buffer<size>::Buffer(const char*)':
Utility.h:174: error: `buffer' undeclared (first use this function)
Utility.h:174: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only
once for each function it appears in.)
Utility.h:176: error: no matching function for call to `strchr(<type
/usr/include/iso/string_iso.h:130: note: candidates are: char* strchr
(const char*, int)
/usr/sfw/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/3.4.3/.....RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3)
> > > The "resolution" was to upgrade to ACE-5.4.3 or later, which has
> > > code fixes to help with the newer compiler. Not sure how
> much would
> > > need to change, but you may be able to inspect the differences
> > > that part of the code wrt the newer ACE release to backport the
> > > fixes.
> > Thanks, I've downloaded and am building. Is ACE-5.4.3 the latest
> > production release ?
> Well, the definition of "production release" for ACE is a bit murky
P...RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3) #2
Right... The issue is a bit odd... Here's the check I added for ACE:
dnl This check was added to work around a system-supplied header
dnl (/usr/include/netinet/ip.h) that won't compile with Visual Age C++
dnl unless the _NO_BITFIELDS preprocessor macro is defined. The
dnl there recommend use of _NO_BITFIELDS (and recode where needed to
dnl that), but we won't just turn it on. Check to see if it's needed.
dnl that this check is related to headers but done before we really
dnl the header is present. Thus, if the bare compile fa...RE: [ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.0 won't compile after GCC upgrade (3.3.3 -> 3.4.3) #2
Ok, thanks for that explanation.
I solved this a different way for a similar problem that showed up
with Visual Age C++ on AIX 5.2... When the 5.4.5 beta comes out,
please try this again and hopefully no further workarounds will be
Steve Huston, Riverace Corporation
Adding Service to Open Source Software
ACE book info at http://www.riverace.com/acebooks/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Colm McHugh [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: We...upgraded gcc from 3.3 to 3.4 and having problems
Our code used to compile happily under g++ 3.3.6 but now that we have
upgraded the compiler to version 3.4.6 our code breaks when linking
with this error message
undefined reference to `std::locale::id::id()
Can anyone tell me why and what the solution is?
I have been ploughing through the g++ 3.4.6 release notes to correct
template problems and now do not know where to look having come across
this problem :(
> Our code used to compile happily under g++ 3.3.6 but now that we have
> upgraded the compiler to version 3.4.6 our code breaks when linking
> with th...Upgrading from 3.3 to 3.6
I'm just wondering if the upgrade option provided by the boot disk will
work. I know reinstallation will work, but of course it's not the option I
want. So if I follow the changes listed on the mini-upgrade page, will such
a upgrade be possible? Thanks very much.
> I'm just wondering if the upgrade option provided by the boot disk
> work. I know reinstallation will work, but of course it's not the option I
> want. So if I follow the changes listed on the mini-upgrade page, will
> such a upgrade be possible? Than...At 22.214.171.124 installing bos.adt.include 126.96.36.199 wants 188.8.131.52 !
I posted this before but the replies were not helpful so here goes again...
I currently have AIX 4.3.3 ML 11 installed with no bos.adt.include fileset
I want to install Visual Age 4 but it requires bos.adt.include 184.108.40.206
I tried to install a current version, 220.127.116.11 (I think), but it requires
I extracted 18.104.22.168 from IBM's Web site but it depends on 22.214.171.124 (which is
Is there some way out of this never-ending quest?
> I posted this before but the replies were not helpful so here goes again...
> I extracted 126.96.36.199 from ...tkzinc 3.3.4 & 3.3.6+ ?
Do anybody know what different between version 3.3.4 and 3.3.6+ ?
And, where can I find documentation on tkzinc 3.3.6+ ?
...XEmacs on OpenBSD 3.3 with XFree 4.3.0
Recently i upgraded my XFree86 to version 4.3.0 and shortly after that I
noticed that shift + function keys are are interpreted by XEmacs like
function keys only. I installed openbsd on the laptop recently so I'm
not sure that before XFree upgrade that worked. I've checked some things
to locate the problem:
- On my desktop machine runnign same version of XFree detects shift
- same on cygwin install.
- compiled these versions on the laptop to see if the problem is version
all test are with sam...Is there a g++ 3.4.3 (or better) binary available for AIX 4.3.3 ?
Have tried compiling gcc/g++ 3.4.3 from the UCLA Web site but after
resolving several problems got stuck in building libstdc++.a:
/tmp//ccYxSLZd.s: line 4674: .set operand undefined or forward
/tmp//ccYxSLZd.s: line 4675: .set operand undefined or forward
/tmp//ccYxSLZd.s: line 4705: .set operand undefined or forward
> Have tried compiling gcc/g++ 3.4.3 from the UCLA Web site but after
> resolving several problems got stuck in building libstdc++.a: