Telnet software

  • Follow


Is it possible to get 150 columns or more with telnet software
(Windows to Unix). Is so, what emulation, what software?

I have a 21-inch monitor and work with dbs a lot. Need a wide spread.


0
Reply mike 12/5/2003 3:56:41 PM

mike@nospam.com (Mike) wrote in
news:3fd0a9b4.3427278@news.webperception.com: 

> 
> Is it possible to get 150 columns or more with telnet software
> (Windows to Unix). Is so, what emulation, what software?
> 
> I have a 21-inch monitor and work with dbs a lot. Need a wide spread.

What happens when you download and run putty.exe on Windows from:

http://tinyurl.com/2r4w

-- 
- Mark ->
--
0
Reply Mark 12/5/2003 4:29:58 PM


In article <3fd0a9b4.3427278@news.webperception.com>, Mike wrote:
: Is it possible to get 150 columns or more with telnet software
: (Windows to Unix). Is so, what emulation, what software?
: 
: I have a 21-inch monitor and work with dbs a lot. Need a wide spread.
: 
  http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/k95.html

You can have any height or width you want as long as their product is
not greater than 8192.  You can also have both vertical and horizontal
scrolling within your session, with up to 2 million lines of scrollback.
Telnet, SSH, Rlogin, dialup -- all the same.

- Frank
0
Reply Frank 12/5/2003 5:30:28 PM

Mike wrote:
> 
> Is it possible to get 150 columns or more with telnet software
> (Windows to Unix). Is so, what emulation, what software?
> 
> I have a 21-inch monitor and work with dbs a lot. Need a wide spread.

You may even try dtelnet - http://dtelnet.sf.net
0
Reply Lorinczy 12/6/2003 2:06:27 PM

Mark A. Odell wrote:
> mike@nospam.com (Mike) wrote in
> news:3fd0a9b4.3427278@news.webperception.com: 
> 
>>Is it possible to get 150 columns or more with telnet software
>>(Windows to Unix). Is so, what emulation, what software?
>>
>>I have a 21-inch monitor and work with dbs a lot. Need a wide spread.
> 
> What happens when you download and run putty.exe on Windows from:
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/2r4w

Please post the original URL, if possible:

 o  it's better to have the original URL instead of some
    arbitrary shorthand, because it has a higher
    recognition value

 o  Most people reading news already have a client enabling
    them to directly go to an URL. Who still has to enter the
    URL manually?

Heiner
-- 
 ___ _
/ __| |_ _____ _____ _ _     Heiner STEVEN <heiner.steven@nexgo.de>
\__ \  _/ -_) V / -_) ' \    Shell Script Programmers: visit
|___/\__\___|\_/\___|_||_|   http://www.shelldorado.com/
0
Reply Heiner 12/13/2003 11:20:21 PM

Heiner Steven <heiner.steven@nexgo.de> writes:

>> http://tinyurl.com/2r4w
>
> Please post the original URL, if possible:
>
>  o  it's better to have the original URL instead of some
>     arbitrary shorthand, because it has a higher
>     recognition value
>
>  o  Most people reading news already have a client enabling
>     them to directly go to an URL. Who still has to enter the
>     URL manually?

Many sites use ridiculous five-line URLs.  These often get seriously
munged by some news readers.

-- 
M�ns Rullg�rd
mru@kth.se
0
Reply mru 12/13/2003 11:29:40 PM

M�ns Rullg�rd wrote:
> Heiner Steven <heiner.steven@nexgo.de> writes:
> 
>>>http://tinyurl.com/2r4w
>>
>>Please post the original URL, if possible:
>>
>> o  it's better to have the original URL instead of some
>>    arbitrary shorthand, because it has a higher
>>    recognition value
>>
>> o  Most people reading news already have a client enabling
>>    them to directly go to an URL. Who still has to enter the
>>    URL manually?
> 
> Many sites use ridiculous five-line URLs.  These often get seriously
> munged by some news readers.

Agreed. But often the URLs only get long because of session
ids that can just be removed.

Heiner
-- 
 ___ _
/ __| |_ _____ _____ _ _     Heiner STEVEN <heiner.steven@nexgo.de>
\__ \  _/ -_) V / -_) ' \    Shell Script Programmers: visit
|___/\__\___|\_/\___|_||_|   http://www.shelldorado.com/
0
Reply Heiner 12/14/2003 12:19:52 AM

On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 at 00:19 GMT, Heiner Steven wrote:
> M�ns Rullg�rd wrote:
>> Heiner Steven <heiner.steven@nexgo.de> writes:
>> 
>>>>http://tinyurl.com/2r4w
>>>
>>>Please post the original URL, if possible:
>>>
>>> o  it's better to have the original URL instead of some
>>>    arbitrary shorthand, because it has a higher
>>>    recognition value
>>>
>>> o  Most people reading news already have a client enabling
>>>    them to directly go to an URL. Who still has to enter the
>>>    URL manually?
>> 
>> Many sites use ridiculous five-line URLs.  These often get seriously
>> munged by some news readers.
> 
> Agreed. But often the URLs only get long because of session
> ids that can just be removed.

    But it is not easy to see at a glance what can be removed, and
    what is necessary.

    I prefer to post both the full URL and a shorthand URL; the best
    of both worlds.

-- 
    Chris F.A. Johnson                        http://cfaj.freeshell.org
    ===================================================================
    My code (if any) in this post is copyright 2003, Chris F.A. Johnson
    and may be copied under the terms of the GNU General Public License
0
Reply Chris 12/14/2003 3:52:48 AM

7 Replies
193 Views

(page loaded in 0.165 seconds)

Similiar Articles:













7/13/2012 11:33:09 AM


Reply: