Upgrading 5.0.5 to 5.0.6/5.0.7
I've inheirited 3 SCO Servers and need to upgrade one to 5.0.6 from
5.0.5. The other two are at 5.0.6 and I want them all in line. Some
1. Does SCO charge for this upgrade? If so, how much?
2. How easy is the upgrade?
3. Should I go to 5.0.7 instead for all the machines?
Jon Wynacht typed (on Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 09:16:17AM -0700):
| I've inheirited 3 SCO Servers and need to upgrade one to 5.0.6 from
| 5.0.5. The other two are at 5.0.6 and I want them all in line. Some
| 1. Does SCO charge for this upgrade? If so, how much?
...Upgrade OSR 5.0.5 to 5.0.6 or 5.0.7
I've two olds servers DELL Poweredge 2300 with Raid PERC, funtionning
with OSR 5.0.5.
Iwant upgrade the OS to 5.0.6 or 5.0.7 but it seems (sco.com) that the
poweredge 2300 is bnot supported after OSR 5.0.5 (Hardware
has somebody attempt this with success and which drivers (Raid PERC,
Adaptec) are used.
Thank you in advance fir the help.
Email : email@example.com
"La perfection n'est pas lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien �
ajouter, mais lorsque qu'il n'y a plus rien � enl...NFS SCo 5.0.5 with SCO 6.0.0
I have a folder on SCO 5.0.5 server shared through NFS with a new SCO 6.0.0
with MP2 server (converted from a SCO 5.0.6 version).
Before conversion file locks (over network) on this folder works well (eg
from server SCO 5.0.6 I was able to see locks generated from SCO 5.0.5 box
and viceversa), now with SCO 6.0.0 does not work !
I see that on SCO 6.0.0 the lockd daemon is active .. so it should work ...
Please can you help me ?
...Re: SATA on 5.0.6 or 5.0.7?
: "Steve M. Fabac, Jr." <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message
: > Anyone running SCO 5.0.6 or 5.0.7 on servers with
: > SATA drives?
: > I'd like to hear from anyone with SATA based servers and if
: > they met their exceptions for performance and reliability.
: > In the past, I have always used SCSI drives for the performance
: > and customary 5 year warrantee. Now SATA drives are available with
: > 5 year warrantee and manufactures claim the drives are equivalent
: > to SCSI performance at 40% less co...Sco OpenServer upgrading 5.0.6 to 5.0.7
I need some help.
I need to upgrade my Sco O.S.506 to 507 and told me that I need to reinstall
all the operative system and not the upgrading of it.
Is it true ?
Thanks in advance and excuse me if before someone alredy answered this query
but I do not find anything about this matter
Pineapple typed (on Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 01:39:46PM +0200):
| I need some help.
| I need to upgrade my Sco O.S.506 to 507 and told me that I need to reinstall
| all the operative system and not the upgrading of it.
| Is it true ?
| Thanks in advance and excuse me if before someone alredy answe...Totaly new iOS 7.0.5/ 7.0.4/7.0.6 Jailbreak For iPhone 5s,5c,5,4s Just Released
The Most wanted Popular jailbreak iPhone 5 iOS 7 tool from http://iphonejailbreak-unlock.com – compiled by the iPhone Team – has just been released and updated with full and easy support for Unlock/Jailbreak iPhone 5/4S/4/3GS iOS 7/6.1.4/6.1.4 And 7.0.5/7 Untethered. You may have caught our tutorial, which detailed how one could jailbreak their device tethered using Redsn0w, although since it was a pre-iOS 7 and 7.0.5/7 release, users needed to "point" the tool to the older firmware.
Team Unlock-Jailbreak was created few years ago, combines some of the jailbreak and unlock communi...\\BI 7.0\\ SAP 4.7\\ ECC 5.0\\ ECC 6.0\\CRM \\ BW 3.5\\
Check your requirement from the following list of Software
SAP IDES for Your Personal Practice at Home.
I. SAP ECC 6.0 SR2 12DVDs + Screen shot Installation Guide
II. SAP ECC 5.0 IDES 7 DVDs + Screen shot Installation Guide
III. SAP 4.7IDES 3 DVDs + Screen shot Installation
IV. . SAP SRM 5.0 and CRM 5.0 IDES CRM 4.0IDES
V. SAP bi 7.0 (IDES)
VI. SAP BW 3.5
VII. SAP CRM 5.0
VIII. SAP CRM 4.0
If you interested Please Send Your Mail at: email@example.com
with Your Location and Contact Number.
...SCO 5.0.5/5.0.6 bios clock, time zone and synching
Does SCO expect the BIOS clock to be set to UTC?
Ive got a few SCO boxen spread across a couple of time zones and at
the moment, the bios clocks in the servers are set to localtime not
The timezone settings in SCO Admin are also wrong.
I was under the impression *nix always expects the BIOS clock to be
set to UTC and then the timezone settings in SCO tell the OS what the
local time is.
This does not seem to be the case for me.
On a testing box, Ive set the BIOS clock to UTC, set the correct
timezone in scoadmin but the date command in a root shell still gives
the wrong time.
E...SCO 5.0.5 vs. 6.0
I'm having a new server built:
SuperMicro P4SC8 Mother Board
Intel P4 3.0Ghz 800 FSB 1GB CPU
73GB 10K 80 PIN SCSI Drive
Sony 20/40GB DAT Drive SDT11000/BN DDS4
Adaptec 2010S Card for Mirroring
Comtrol Rockport Card 99126-7
Is there any reason I should update my current version of SCO 5.0.5?
The following article is a recommendation from SCO when using P4
"FrankS" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message
> I'm having a new server built:
> SuperMicro P...moving printers from 5.0.6 to 5.0.7
I have a whole lot of printers attached to ttys(specialix multi serial
ports) on SCO 5.0.6, I am setting up a new server with 5.0.7 is there
an easy way to move the printers configurations from 5.0.6 to 5.0.7
e,g Can I just copy /usr/spool/lp/*/lp from 5.0.6 to 5.0.7, would that
make all my printers appear in 5.0.7
email@example.com typed (on Mon, May 21, 2007 at 06:39:27AM -0700):
| I have a whole lot of printers attached to ttys(specialix multi serial
| ports) on SCO 5.0.6, I am setting up a new server with 5.0.7 is there
| an easy way to move the printers configurations fro...Upgrading SCO Openserver 5.0.4 to 5.0.7
Hello, i am interested in the steps needed to upgrade 5.0.4 to 5.0.7
and the amount of time needed to successfully complete. Also any
gotchas i could look out for would be great to know.
On 2/8/2011 8:49 AM, drew wrote:
> Hello, i am interested in the steps needed to upgrade 5.0.4 to 5.0.7
> and the amount of time needed to successfully complete. Also any
> gotchas i could look out for would be great to know.
Start with a clean install of 5.0.7 - don't try the upgrade option
during the IPL.
Upgrades didn't work very well until 5.0.5 came out.
Obv...SCO Open Server 5.0.6 versus 5.0.4
Anybody can point me to info or can state if there is a performance
improvement from running 5.0.6 versus 5.0.4. Application is database access
> Anybody can point me to info or can state if there is a performance
> improvement from running 5.0.6 versus 5.0.4. Application is database
I don't think you are going to get a useful answer.
Let's assume that I could authoritatively say that 5.0.6 has
performance related improvements over .4 in certain areas. I can't
recall if it does or doesn't, bu...[ANN] Rails 0.7.0, Action Pack 0.8.5, Active Record 0.9.5
I gather that most people are now familar with the RoR suite, so I'm
skipping the formal introductions and will just bring you the meat.
Get it all from http://www.rubyonrails.org, talk it up on #rubyonrails
Or even easier, just do "gem install rails" (or "gem update" if you're
already running on Gem Rails) -- you'll automatically install all the
newest versions of the required dependencies.
Rails 0.7.0: Fixed WEBrick, new_model generator, easier fixtures
The WEBrick dispatch has...User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
Time for a new Cartoon character sock - no?
On 8/16/11 1:16 PM, Redjak wrote:
> Time for a new cartoon character sock, no?
Any suggestions Olive Oyl?
"Chance Furlong" wrote in message
On 8/16/11 1:16 PM, Redjak wrote:
> Time for a new cartoon character sock, no?
>Any suggestions Olive Oyl?
Yeah - something stupid, as usual.
...SCSI tape not working after upgrade 5.0.5 -> 5.0.7
After an upgrade of SCO OpenServer 5.0.5 running on Dell PowerEdge 2400 to
5.0.7 we found the tape drive does not work. In "mkdev tape", when you go
view the installed tape drives it lists none. But if you try to create a new
one, it can't:
You are about to add the following SCSI device:
Type Adapter Device Number ID LUN Bus
SCSI alad tape 0 6 0 0
Update SCSI configuration? (y/n) y
Cannot add this tape.
Another tape is already...SYbase SQL & SCO OpenServer 5.0.4/5.0.5
Can somone help me with wich SQL versions runs on SCO OSR5.0.4 and SCO OSR
So your the customer SCO still has :-)
Sorry.. Couldn't resist !
ASE 10.0.2 was certified on SCO OSR5.0.2 with OS patches SLS 422a, SLS
437a. It wasn't certified on anything higher.
ASE 11.0.x was certified on 5.0.4, but nothing higher.
Sybase doesn't support 10.x or 11.x any more
...if time = 3 seconds, how do i set the values of the time steps 0,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.5,1.0,1.5,2.0,3.0,5.0 to -9999 from time =3 seconds
I have 18 inputs (arrays) which contain certain statistics and if time = 3 seconds, set the values of time step 5.0 to -9999.0.
I was wondering if there is an efficient way to do this without using a lot of case statements?
it's not really clear to me what you want to do...
I suspect: you have an array containing values and you want to output
them with a fixed timing of 3 seconds: you should use a for loop
autoindexing trough your array and sending the value to your
indicator/output/whatever. Put a "wait for next multiple" into your for
Or do you want to have a minimum time delay of 3 seconds? Again use a
for loop, get the time value and use a InRange&Coerce with minimum
set to 3 seconds...
Or you should explain more precisely what you need...
Thanks for that.
Let me explain.
The time may vary. Let me give an example. if time = 2.1, I want to set the time step's 3.0 and 5.0's values to -9999.0.
if the time =0.1 seconds then I want to set 0.2,0.3, 0.5 etc values to -9999.0
Can you please help?
do you use different accounts/nicknames ?
Well, that's easy, at least for a sorted array:
Search for your time-value in the array (Threshold 1D array). Fill all
elements from that index till the end with your "error...[ace-users] ACE+TAO+CIAO
We are pleased to announce the latest ACE+TAO+CIAO beta. This beta has been
tagged ACE+TAO+CIAO-5_5_6. The main difference between this release and x.5.5
is that the ACE exception macros (except for ACE_THROW_RETURN and
ACE_THROW_SPEC) have been removed from all TAO and CIAO code.
It is available from the same download location as per the previous release.
The doxygen documentation for the beta is also available. Included with this
beta, besides the packages combined of sources and generate makefiles, we also
provide source only packages for the group of users which use MPC to generate
their own makefiles.
We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your applications, and
let us know if you encounter any problems. Please use the:
so that we have the proper version/platform/compiler/options you're using to
report problems. We also request that you take a look at:
for the status of various ongoing projects at the DOC groups of WashU, UCI, and
Vanderbilt to move ACE+TAO+CIAO forward. Overviews of our recent progress and
upcoming plans are available at:
The overall success rates for the test results gathered from all our daily
builds is 96% for the ACE tests and 92% for the TAO tests. Please see:
http://ww...Differences between 5.0.0 and 5.0.1?
Can anyone tell me what the differences are between 5.0 and its point
release? I bought 5.0 (student) last fall, and Wolfram wants $100
maintenance fee to get the minor point release upgrade.
...Upgrade from 5.0.7 to 6.0
I need to upgrade a system from Open Server 5.0.7 to 6.0. All of the
customer's data is in /u which currently is not a separately mounted
Will the upgrade to 6.0 delete or otherwise adversely affect the data
in the /u directory?
If the upgrade will affect the data in /u, will making /u a separately
mounted file system protect the data?
Thanks for your assistance,
Rodgers Hemer typed (on Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 01:09:39PM -0700):
> I need to upgrade a system from Open Server 5.0.7 to 6.0. All of the
> customer&...SCO OpenServer 5.0.4/5.0.5 New Daylight Savings dates
Has anyone yet come up with a solution on changing older SCO OpenServer
5.0.4 / 5.0.5 / 5.0.6 systems to accommodate the new daylight savings
dates starting this year??
I have looked around at SCO's site and they have an update to install
on 5.0.7 systems that also indicate you should install new libc, etc
Anyone know how to fix this on older SCO OpenServer releases??
Thanks for any help
scooter typed (on Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 12:37:58PM -0800):
| Has anyone yet come up with a solution on changing older SCO OpenServer
| 5.0.4 / 5.0....AIX 5.1 / VAC 6.0 vs AIX 5.2 / patched VAC 6.0
I am trying to build some C++ application on the following environment: AIX
5.2 / patched Visual Age C++ 6.0.
This application is based on libraries built for the AIX 5.1 / Visual Age
C++ 6.0 (base, ie no patch) platform.
Compilation works fine. However link results in unresolved symbols (defined
in the above libraries).
According to IBM support:
- AIX 5.1 / Visual Age C++ 6.0 is a supported platform
- AIX 5.2 / Visual Age C++ 6.0 with lattest patch is a supported platform
- AIX 5.2 / Visual Age C++ 6.00 base version (ie without any patch) isn't
a supported platform (!...[ace-users] Re: How can I use ACE(Latest Beta Kit) for AIX version 5.3/5.2 and VisualAge C++ 7.0/6.0 for AIX on machine IBM P690? \
Thanks very much for your email. Please make sure to send all
questions related to TAO or ACE to the ACE mailing list or ACE+TAO
newsgroup, rather than to me directly since I travel frequently and
often don't have ready access to email. See
for more info on how to access these resources.
> I want to use ACE.tar.bz2(Latest Beta Kit) on AIX version 5.3,Now
> I'm writing application program base on ACE.tar.bz2 (Latest Beta
> Kit) and testing ACE.tar.bz2(Latest Beta Kit) on AIX version 5.2 for
> IBM P690 and using VisualAge C++ 6.0 and VisualAge C++ 7.0,It?s very
> strange ,the ACE.tar.bz2 was compiled successful,But the application
> program can?t be compiled success,There are a lot of problems.It has
> reported a lot of mistakes of STL head file in VisualAge ,and then
> It told me there are something wrong in VisualAge C++ 6.0/7.0's head
> file.I don't know why,Then ,I written testing code ,only have tested
> VisualAge C++ 6.0 and VisualAge C++ 7.0 for AIX version 5.2's head
> file already,the compiler was compiling and running up to snuff,no
> mistake in head file.And you know ,When I put the same application
> program and ACE.tar.bz2(Latest Beta Kit) in Redhatlinux for PC and
> Turbo linux for IBM eServe BladeCenter, there are no mistakes,and
> It?s normally compiling and running so fast.So,I don?t know why,what
> happ...Re: System Improvement Ballot enhancements for FTP 6.5/7.0/7.5
Hey, I gotta new (old) one! I mean, I wondered about this when I first
learned MPE IV in 1984!
So, everyone who has a console has seen the message that says
HH:MM/#Snnnn/pin/LOGOFF ON LDEV xx ?
Now, how many times has someone come up to you and asked when did so and
so log off the system? Huh!
If one REALLY wanted to know WHEN WHO logged off, one has to go the log
files to learn who session number #Snnnn was at log on time. (Unless
the party who logged-off had just logged-on a minues earlier and it was
How much TROUBLE would it be, to change the Console LOG...