f



SCO OpenServer RL5.0.0 License Expiration dilemma

I am attempting a rebuild a system after a restoration failure.  I have 
installed the operation system but am unable to reset the License value 
under SCOAdmin License Manager to "Yes" from "Expired".  I followed the 
procedures for resetting the CMOS date as indicated in TA#104759 from the 
SCO kb, but to no avail.  The software registered correctly.

I am able to boot successfully to single-user mode.  I am not able to 
perform any actions on the filesystem.

SWversion: SCO OpenServer Release 5.0.0
Pentium 133
EISA platform

If anyone has suggestions, I am listening.  Thank you, in advance.

Rich 


0
richvohs (4)
4/9/2006 10:12:22 PM
comp.unix.sco.misc 3925 articles. 0 followers. Post Follow

6 Replies
1653 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 51

Richard Vohs typed (on Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 03:12:22PM -0700):
| I am attempting a rebuild a system after a restoration failure.  I have 
| installed the operation system but am unable to reset the License value 
| under SCOAdmin License Manager to "Yes" from "Expired".  I followed the 
| procedures for resetting the CMOS date as indicated in TA#104759 from the 
| SCO kb, but to no avail.  The software registered correctly.
| 
| I am able to boot successfully to single-user mode.  I am not able to 
| perform any actions on the filesystem.
| 
| SWversion: SCO OpenServer Release 5.0.0
| Pentium 133
| EISA platform
| 
| If anyone has suggestions, I am listening.  Thank you, in advance.
| 

So what does 'date' report?

-- 
JP
	==> http://www.frappr.com/cusm <==
0
jpr5879 (1159)
4/10/2006 12:17:14 AM
"Jean-Pierre Radley" <jpr@jpr.com> wrote in message 
news:20060410001713.GC4147@jpradley.jpr.com...
> Richard Vohs typed (on Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 03:12:22PM -0700):
> | I am attempting a rebuild a system after a restoration failure.  I have
> | installed the operation system but am unable to reset the License value
> | under SCOAdmin License Manager to "Yes" from "Expired".  I followed the
> | procedures for resetting the CMOS date as indicated in TA#104759 from 
> the
> | SCO kb, but to no avail.  The software registered correctly.
> |
> | I am able to boot successfully to single-user mode.  I am not able to
> | perform any actions on the filesystem.
> |
> | SWversion: SCO OpenServer Release 5.0.0
> | Pentium 133
> | EISA platform
> |
> | If anyone has suggestions, I am listening.  Thank you, in advance.
> |
>
> So what does 'date' report?
>
> -- 
> JP
> ==> http://www.frappr.com/cusm <==

JP,

The system date is today's date: Mon Apr 10 06:48:12 PST 2006.

Rich 


0
richvohs (4)
4/10/2006 1:51:04 PM
"Richard Vohs" <richvohs@comcast.net> wrote in message 
news:toWdnUcAh4FD_6fZnZ2dnUVZ_vadnZ2d@comcast.com...
> "Jean-Pierre Radley" <jpr@jpr.com> wrote in message 
> news:20060410001713.GC4147@jpradley.jpr.com...
>> Richard Vohs typed (on Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 03:12:22PM -0700):
>> | I am attempting a rebuild a system after a restoration failure.  I have
>> | installed the operation system but am unable to reset the License value
>> | under SCOAdmin License Manager to "Yes" from "Expired".  I followed the
>> | procedures for resetting the CMOS date as indicated in TA#104759 from the
>> | SCO kb, but to no avail.  The software registered correctly.
>> |
>> | I am able to boot successfully to single-user mode.  I am not able to
>> | perform any actions on the filesystem.
>> |
>> | SWversion: SCO OpenServer Release 5.0.0
>> | Pentium 133
>> | EISA platform
>> |
>> | If anyone has suggestions, I am listening.  Thank you, in advance.
>> |
>>
>> So what does 'date' report?
>>
>> -- 
>> JP
>> ==> http://www.frappr.com/cusm <==
>
> JP,
>
> The system date is today's date: Mon Apr 10 06:48:12 PST 2006.

Please see TA 104954:

http://wdb1.sco.com/kb/showta?taid=104954

Follow the instructions within and tell us the installation date and
expiration date of your 5.0.0 license.

The license manager will report as 'expired' any system running
*before* the installation date, as well as after the expiration date
or before June 1, 1995.

Bob 


0
72027.3605 (442)
4/10/2006 3:29:53 PM
"Bob Bailin" <72027.3605@compuserve.com> wrote in message 
news:RRu_f.23831$NS6.16309@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com...
>
> "Richard Vohs" <richvohs@comcast.net> wrote in message 
> news:toWdnUcAh4FD_6fZnZ2dnUVZ_vadnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> "Jean-Pierre Radley" <jpr@jpr.com> wrote in message 
>> news:20060410001713.GC4147@jpradley.jpr.com...
>>> Richard Vohs typed (on Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 03:12:22PM -0700):
>>> | I am attempting a rebuild a system after a restoration failure.  I 
>>> have
>>> | installed the operation system but am unable to reset the License 
>>> value
>>> | under SCOAdmin License Manager to "Yes" from "Expired".  I followed 
>>> the
>>> | procedures for resetting the CMOS date as indicated in TA#104759 from 
>>> the
>>> | SCO kb, but to no avail.  The software registered correctly.
>>> |
>>> | I am able to boot successfully to single-user mode.  I am not able to
>>> | perform any actions on the filesystem.
>>> |
>>> | SWversion: SCO OpenServer Release 5.0.0
>>> | Pentium 133
>>> | EISA platform
>>> |
>>> | If anyone has suggestions, I am listening.  Thank you, in advance.
>>> |
>>>
>>> So what does 'date' report?
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> JP
>>> ==> http://www.frappr.com/cusm <==
>>
>> JP,
>>
>> The system date is today's date: Mon Apr 10 06:48:12 PST 2006.
>
> Please see TA 104954:
>
> http://wdb1.sco.com/kb/showta?taid=104954
>
> Follow the instructions within and tell us the installation date and
> expiration date of your 5.0.0 license.
>
> The license manager will report as 'expired' any system running
> *before* the installation date, as well as after the expiration date
> or before June 1, 1995.
>
> Bob
>

Thank you, Bob.
Here are my results:

#brand - L
{
{{254}  {0.0} {nul111111}  {s######}  {788832000}  {3944678399}
        {}  {}  {}  {}}
{{132}  {5.0}  {2########}  {bdfyhf00z;g0;k255/2########;s######;u5} 
{787190400}  {1
015349503}
        {SCO:odtes}  {5.0.0b}  {SCO OpenServer Enterprise System} 
{bdfyhf00z;g0;k;u5}}
{{255}  {2########}  {2########}  {}  {787190400}  {1015349503}

(i removed lic# and replaced with ########).

#tcl
tcl>fmtclock 1015349503
Tue Mar 05 09:31:43 PST 2002
tcl>fmtclock 787190400
Su Dec 11 16:00:00 PST 1994

Ah, crum!  The first time I did this, I must have taken clock parms off of 
first line output from brand -L.  That would have yielded a far better 
result (one in my favor).  Looks like my license has truly expired.  Tell me 
this isn't so.

Rich


0
richvohs (4)
4/10/2006 6:37:40 PM
Richard Vohs wrote:
> #tcl
> tcl>fmtclock 1015349503
> Tue Mar 05 09:31:43 PST 2002
> tcl>fmtclock 787190400
> Su Dec 11 16:00:00 PST 1994

Try installing with the date set to some time before year 2000
and post ISL, move the date forward to the present date.

John

0
jboland1 (202)
4/11/2006 9:48:46 AM
<jboland@sco.com> wrote in message 
news:1144742582.354712.265340@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Richard Vohs wrote:
>> #tcl
>> tcl>fmtclock 1015349503
>> Tue Mar 05 09:31:43 PST 2002
>> tcl>fmtclock 787190400
>> Su Dec 11 16:00:00 PST 1994
>
> Try installing with the date set to some time before year 2000
> and post ISL, move the date forward to the present date.
>
> John
>
John,
Thank you. 


0
richvohs (4)
4/12/2006 3:47:13 AM
Reply:

Similar Artilces:

NFS SCo 5.0.5 with SCO 6.0.0
Hi everybody, I have a folder on SCO 5.0.5 server shared through NFS with a new SCO 6.0.0 with MP2 server (converted from a SCO 5.0.6 version). Before conversion file locks (over network) on this folder works well (eg from server SCO 5.0.6 I was able to see locks generated from SCO 5.0.5 box and viceversa), now with SCO 6.0.0 does not work ! I see that on SCO 6.0.0 the lockd daemon is active .. so it should work ... Please can you help me ? Thanks Cuffiette ...

Trying to compile putty-0.60 on SCO UNIX 5.0.7 with GCC and SCO Dev
I am trying to compile putty downloaded from http://linux.softpedia.com/progDownload/PuTTY-Download-347.html but get the error below. gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Werror -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DHAVE_X11 -DHAVE_X -DSYSV -Di386 -DS CO325 -D__SCO__ -DHAVE_XAW -DHAVE_SHAPE_EXT -DHAVE_SHAPE -DHAVE_SHM_EXT -DHAVE_X SHM -DHAVE_XCONVERTCASE -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr /include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/gl ib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/X11R6/include -I.././ -I../charset/ -I../windows/ -I../unix/ -I../mac/ -I../macosx/ -c ../ proxy.c cc1: warnings being treated as errors .../proxy.c: In function `proxy_for_destination': .../proxy.c:315: warning: implicit declaration of function `strncasecmp' gmake: *** [proxy.o] Error 1 # My programming skill level tops out at ./configure and make. Searching for instances of strncasecmp in the putty working directory shows: /tmp/putty-0.60/unix # cd .. # find . -type f -print | xargs grep strncasecmp | less ../mac/stricmp.c:#define strncasecmp strnicmp ../mac/stricmp.c:strncasecmp(s1, s2, n) ../unix/unix.h:#define strnicmp strncasecmp (END) In unix/unix.h: #define DEFAULT_CODEPAGE 0xFFFF #define CP_UTF8 CS_UTF8 /* from libcharset */ #define strnicmp strncasecmp #define stricmp strcasecmp /* BSD-semantics version of signal(), and another helpful function */ void (*putty_signal(int sig, void (*func)(int)))(int); void block_si...

#if 0?0?0:0:0
The following 4-lines source fragment test.c (fourth line empty) #if 0?0?0:0:0 #endif int main(void){return 0?0?0:0:0;} cause: test.c(1) : fatal error C1017: invalid integer constant expression when compiled by cl.exe aka "Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 15.00.30729.01 for 80x86". On the other hand this compile and runs fine. #if 0?(0?0:0):0 #endif int main(void){return 0?0?0:0:0;} Did I hit a but it this compiler's preprocessor? Francois Grieu On 3/30/2010 12:47 PM, Francois Grieu wrote: > The following 4-lines source fr...

SCO OpenServe 6.0.0 Filesystem MUCH Faster Than 5.0.6
The speed of the SCO OpenServer 6.0.0 filesystem is quite noticeably faster than I enjoyed on OpenServer 5.0.6. How do I know? I donno, but it feels and seems so. I didn't expect this, so I didn't make these tests while still on 5.0.6, but I KNOW I have a lot more files and directories on 6.0.0 than I did on 5.0.6. The Verify of my Last Master Backup shows what is on my systen: 255191 files were encountered 167 files were excluded 9 files were not checked because the hard disk file had been modified by a program since it was backed up 2 files were not checked for various reasons 28870 special files (links, directories, devices, etc.) 226143 files verified successfully Master Backups using LONE-TAR(tm) to DVD+RW media ran at about 70-75 MB/min on OSR 5.0.6 but run at 175+ MB/min on 6.0.0, and if I turn off compression run at 260+ MB/min. To see how long it takes to search for a non-existant file: [trebor] ~: time find . -name XPMNYTRE real 0m58.59s user 0m1.72s sys 0m10.96s And to see how many directories had to be read: [trebor] ~: find . -type d | wc -l 23745 Bob -- Bob Stockler +-+ bob@trebor.iglou.com +-+ http://members.iglou.com/trebor Author: MENU EDIT II - The BEST Creator/Editor/Manager for filePro User Menus. Fully functional (time-limited) demos available by email request (specify OS). On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 11:01:36AM -0500, Bob Stockler wrote: > The speed of the SCO ...

Printing issues with SCO UNIX v6.0.0 vs v5.0.7 and prior
>I have a custom database application, written in CADOL, that previously worked FLAWLESSLY on versions of SCO, prior to v6.0.0 . It doesn't matter if I print directly to the HW port or via the spooler, the job either never finishes or doesn't print at all. Jobs via the spooler, are actually worse than direct to port. I have included the ENV variables we use and also more info below. The ENV variables that are set up in the > .profile. > > DEV1=/usr/propac/printfile; export DEV1 > DEV2=/dev/tty1a; export DEV2 > PRINTER1=C0L0hplaser; export PRINTER1 > PRINTER2=C0L0STD1096; export PRINTER2 > hplaser=SPOOL; export hplaser > STD1096=022; export STD1096 > STD1096_I=0002000; export STD1096_I > STD1096_O=; export STD1096_O > STD1096_C=004075; export STD1096_C > STD1096_L=; export STD1096_L > > These above statements set up 2 printers in our application. The > first is a networked Laser printer and the 2nd is a serial printer > hooked up to port tty1a, running 9600 baud with xon/xoff protocol. > In the application(character based), the user selects printer #1 or > #2 and off to the printer the job goes. Also, the hplaser printer is > defined and configured in the spooler using the scoadmin printers >...

(= 0/0 0/0)
Hi, shouldn't > (= 0/0 0/0) => NIL or > (= 0/0 0/0) => T instead of giving out division by zero? 0/0 is different from 1/0, which is the non-existent number n such that 1 x n = 0. The actual result of that expression depends of what you think 0/0 is. I personally feel that 0/0 is any number n such that 0 x n = 0, that is all numbers. hal9@cyberspace.org (Hal Niner) writes: > Hi, > > shouldn't > > > (= 0/0 0/0) => NIL > > or > > > (= 0/0 0/0) => T > > instead of giving out division by zero? 0/0 is different fro...

IP 0.0.0.0/0
Hi Any useful link that explains this IP address range in details, please? Thanks in advance! The Dude In article <Jp6Hg.458762$IK3.24918@pd7tw1no>, The Dude <The Dude@thedu.de> wrote: >Any useful link that explains this IP address range in details, please? Urrr -- 0.0.0.0/0 is the *entire* IPv4 address range, and 0.0.0.0/32 is just the single IPv4 address 0.0.0.0. For any given network, the lowest address in the network is reserved. Historically, the lowest address was one of the two allowed choices for the broadcast address; later, the broadcast a...

Reinstalling root filesystem only in SCO OpenServer 6.0.0
Hi all, Let's assume the next situation: SCO OSR 6.0.0 + patches installed in a hard drive with root, stand, u, u2, u3, ... filesystems on it. Filesystem root gets corrupted and it is to necessary reinstall it. Please, can anybody tell me how can I reinstall the root filesystem leaving untouched the other filesystems? This is a clear option when installing OSR 5.0.x, but I've not been able to locate this option in OSR 6.0.0 Many thanks in advance. Best regards, -- Alberto Rodriguez Rodriguez alberto__@__unilogic.es Alberto Rodriguez typed (on Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 01:17:49PM -0800): | Hi all, | | Let's assume the next situation: | | SCO OSR 6.0.0 + patches installed in a hard drive with root, stand, u, | u2, u3, ... filesystems on it. | | Filesystem root gets corrupted and it is to necessary reinstall it. | | Please, can anybody tell me how can I reinstall the root filesystem | leaving untouched the other filesystems? | | This is a clear option when installing OSR 5.0.x, but I've not been | able to locate this option in OSR 6.0.0 | | Many thanks in advance. Best regards, I always insisted on separate filesystems under OSR 5, but since reinstalling only the root filesystem seems impossible on OSR 6, I stopped making separate filesystems altogether. -- JP On 6 mar, 23:07, Jean-Pierre Radley <j...@jpr.com> wrote: > Alberto Rodriguez typed (on Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 01:17:49PM -0800): > | Hi all, > | > | Let's assume the next si...

Sco OpenServer upgrading 5.0.6 to 5.0.7
I need some help. I need to upgrade my Sco O.S.506 to 507 and told me that I need to reinstall all the operative system and not the upgrading of it. Is it true ? Thanks in advance and excuse me if before someone alredy answered this query but I do not find anything about this matter bye Roberto Pineapple typed (on Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 01:39:46PM +0200): | I need some help. | I need to upgrade my Sco O.S.506 to 507 and told me that I need to reinstall | all the operative system and not the upgrading of it. | Is it true ? No. | Thanks in advance and excuse me if before someone alredy answered this query | but I do not find anything about this matter While In-Place Upgrades do now work considerably better than they did a few years ago, I *still* counsel against them. Use my savefiles script, make good backups, and then a fresh install. -- JP "Pineapple" <roberquaNO@SPAMvirgilio.it> wrote in message news:<c50pa5$vri$1@newsreader.mailgate.org>... > I need some help. > I need to upgrade my Sco O.S.506 to 507 and told me that I need to reinstall > all the operative system and not the upgrading of it. > Is it true ? > Thanks in advance and excuse me if before someone alredy answered this query > but I do not find anything about this matter > > bye > Roberto I had same problem, and I was unable to upgrade . Only fresh reinstall was Ok. Pineapple <roberquaNO@spamvirgilio.it> wrote: >I need some help. >I need to...

0.0**0 = ?
I'm wondering if 0.0**0 (as opposed to 0.0**0.0) has the value 1 as per fortran standard or if this is left to the compiler vendors (different vendors do different things, unhappily). Thanks, Joost Joost VandeVondele wrote: > I'm wondering if 0.0**0 (as opposed to 0.0**0.0) has the value 1 as > per fortran standard or if this is left to the compiler vendors > (different vendors do different things, unhappily). > > Thanks, > > Joost Surely, 0.0**0.0 is mathematically undefined? Therefore, I wouldn't expect the standard to make any pronouncement about the ...

SCO OpenServer 5.0.7 on VMWare ESX 3.0
Hello, I'm trying to install a SCO OpenServer 5.0.7 on VMWare ESX 3.0 but I'm looking a BTLD Driver FOR BLC ( BUS LOGIC ) Where can we Find one ? Regards, Ely Ely.Xaa@gmail.com wrote: > I'm trying to install a SCO OpenServer 5.0.7 on VMWare ESX 3.0 but I'm > looking a BTLD Driver FOR BLC ( BUS LOGIC ) > Where can we Find one ? See: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.sco.misc/msg/9bad2852a40218aa >Bela< This probaby won't help you but just incase others want to use it I have installed OpenServer 5.0.6, 5.0.7 and 6.0 on an Intel MacBook Pro with VMWare's new Fusion (beta) product for the Mac right out of the box without any BTLDs. This really helps as I can take a single laptop around with me now. Only one draw back is that it only works in single CPU mode, installing SMP causes VMWare to crash but I'm sure that will be fixed in the final build. Regards, Rob. Ely.Xaa@gmail.com wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to install a SCO OpenServer 5.0.7 on VMWare ESX 3.0 but I'm > looking a BTLD Driver FOR BLC ( BUS LOGIC ) > Where can we Find one ? > > Regards, > Ely > <rob@vetsystems.com> wrote: > This probaby won't help you but just incase others want to use it I have > installed OpenServer 5.0.6, 5.0.7 and 6.0 on an Intel MacBook Pro with > VMWare's new Fusion (beta) product for the Mac right out of the box > without any BTLDs. This is because VMware...

"some\0\0\0\0\0\0"
can i use such form of adding zeros to the strings/literals to 'pad' them with zeros ? or this is not guwranteed to work? need that for assuring that strings for example arepadded to some amount of bytes thus using fast compare which only checks some amount of data and do not bother for checking ends, etc 9you know what i mean) On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:30:19 -0700, fir saw fit to publish the following: > can i use such form of adding zeros to the strings/literals to 'pad' > them with zeros ? Yes you can. (I feel SOOO presidential right now) > or this is n...

Any get Postgresql 8.0.1 running on SCO Openserver 5.0.7
I can get Postgresql to compile using the SCO compiler but when I try to run a 'gmake check' I get the following errors: pg_regress: initdb failed Examine ./log/initdb.log for the reason. Running in noclean mode. Mistakes will not be cleaned up. initdb: could not find suitable encoding for locale "C_C.C" Rerun initdb with the -E option. Try "initdb --help" for more information. The files belonging to this database system will be owned by user "jpogo". This user must also own the server process. The database cluster will be initialized with locale C_C.C. Please let me know if you have any ideas of how fix this. Thanks, Jeff. jrpogo @ yahoo . com ...

SYbase SQL & SCO OpenServer 5.0.4/5.0.5
Can somone help me with wich SQL versions runs on SCO OSR5.0.4 and SCO OSR 5.0.5? So your the customer SCO still has :-) Sorry.. Couldn't resist ! ASE 10.0.2 was certified on SCO OSR5.0.2 with OS patches SLS 422a, SLS 437a. It wasn't certified on anything higher. ASE 11.0.x was certified on 5.0.4, but nothing higher. Sybase doesn't support 10.x or 11.x any more ...

0:0:0:0:phone
Under kerio Admin screen,local Address I get: 0:0:0:0:phone where "phone" is the local port number. What the hell is that supposed to mean? MikeStevens.invalid@spamtrap.org wrote: > Under kerio Admin screen,local Address I get: 0:0:0:0:phone > > where "phone" is the local port number. What the hell is that supposed to > mean? That's illegal -- there should be nothing coming from 0.0.0.0 at all, on ANY port. Block that IP outright. -- Cinemuck, n.: The combination of popcorn, soda, and melted chocolate which covers the floors of movie theaters. -- Rich Hall, "Sniglets" 0.0.0.0 is seen as YOUR ip address until you get assigned a ip address. They even said it was their local port, so its something just listening on a local port which has the alias 'phone'. "NeoSadist" <neosad1st@charter.net> wrote in message news:vvscmg52kap0fc@corp.supernews.com... MikeStevens.invalid@spamtrap.org wrote: > Under kerio Admin screen,local Address I get: 0:0:0:0:phone > > where "phone" is the local port number. What the hell is that supposed to > mean? That's illegal -- there should be nothing coming from 0.0.0.0 at all, on ANY port. Block that IP outright. -- Cinemuck, n.: The combination of popcorn, soda, and melted chocolate which covers the floors of movie theaters. -- Rich Hall, "Sniglets" Go into the Firewall Status...

what is the significance of 0.0.0.0
is this the default gateway of whole internet. or is this the default gateway of a whole class A ip addresses. or is this a network address of a particular sub-net. please explain it pragmatically with regards novice wrote: > is this the default gateway of whole internet. > or is this the default gateway of a whole class A ip addresses. > > or is this a network address of a particular sub-net. > please explain it pragmatically > with regards Written that way, it's nothing more than an IP address. On 10/04/2010 02:53 PM, novice wrote: > is this the default gateway of whole internet. > or is this the default gateway of a whole class A ip addresses. > > or is this a network address of a particular sub-net. > please explain it pragmatically > with regards It's an invalid IP address. What 0.0.0.0 actually MEANS depends on the program you're using it with. -- Linards Ticmanis On Oct 4, 8:53=A0am, novice <rajat123si...@gmail.com> wrote: > is this the default gateway of whole internet. > or is this the default gateway of a whole class A ip addresses. > > or is this a network address of a particular sub-net. > please explain it pragmatically > with regards Depending on where you got the 0.0.0.0 from, it can have different meanings. In a socket(7) call, it generally means "all addresses", as in "bind to all addresses on this system" (bind(2)) In netstat(8), it generally means &qu...

How to interpolate a [0 0 0 1 0 0 ...0 1 0 0 0 ...0 0] vector please help
dear friends, i have t vector; t=linspace(0,.00007,76); k vector is [0 0 0 1......1 0 0 ..], its like all zeros except two 1`s, on a different time instants. when i apply this command ; k=interp1(tau,k,t); tau is also the same as t. one question is that,do we need to interpolate the vector k from one time vector to another of the same length? as here length(t)=length(tau). second question is that when i apply this command, the vector k is returned as a single entry???? please help me on this one. thanks "salman " <salmanabdullah9@gmail.com> wrote in message <iujd42$she$1@newscl01ah.mathworks.com>... > dear friends, > > i have t vector; t=linspace(0,.00007,76); > > k vector is [0 0 0 1......1 0 0 ..], its like all zeros except two 1`s, on a different time instants. when i apply this command ; > > k=interp1(tau,k,t); > > tau is also the same as t. one question is that,do we need to interpolate the vector k from one time vector to another of the same length? as here length(t)=length(tau). ================ No. tau and t can be of different lengths. Bear in mind though that if tau=t then the output k will be the same as the input k. So, it doesn't make sense that "tau is also the same as t". > second question is that when i apply this command, the vector k is returned as a single entry???? =============== No, I can't reproduce that, as the following shows >> t=linspace(0,.00007,76); tau= t...

SCO OpenServer 5.0.4/5.0.5 New Daylight Savings dates
Has anyone yet come up with a solution on changing older SCO OpenServer 5.0.4 / 5.0.5 / 5.0.6 systems to accommodate the new daylight savings dates starting this year?? I have looked around at SCO's site and they have an update to install on 5.0.7 systems that also indicate you should install new libc, etc Anyone know how to fix this on older SCO OpenServer releases?? Thanks for any help Scott Ullmann Telespectrum sullmann@telespectrum.com scooter typed (on Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 12:37:58PM -0800): | Has anyone yet come up with a solution on changing older SCO OpenServer | 5.0.4 / 5.0.5 / 5.0.6 systems to accommodate the new daylight savings | dates starting this year?? | | I have looked around at SCO's site and they have an update to install | on 5.0.7 systems that also indicate you should install new libc, etc | | Anyone know how to fix this on older SCO OpenServer releases?? I'm in the EST timezone, and so I would edit /etc/TIMEZONE from: TZ=EST5EDT to: TZ=EST5EDT,M3,2,0/2,M11,1,0/2 -- JP ==> http://www.frappr.com/cusm <== On Jan 22, 4:24 pm, Jean-Pierre Radley <j...@jpr.com> wrote: > scooter typed (on Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 12:37:58PM -0800): > | Has anyone yet come up with a solution on changing older SCO OpenServer > | 5.0.4 / 5.0.5 / 5.0.6 systems to accommodate the new daylight savings > | dates starting this year?? > | > | I have looked around at SCO's site and they have an update to install > | on 5.0.7 ...

Looking for precompiled 'rsync" for SCO 5.0.5, 5.0.6 and 5.0.7
I was recommended to use 'rsync' for multi-site transfers. But I have come to find that "rsync" does not exist already in OpenServer 5.0.5, 5.0.6 and 5.0.7. You can only get the "source" files which you "must" compile in order to create the "rsync." These seems to require that you compile these on every level of OpenServer you need. Where / how can I get the 'rsync' binaries already compiled for the levels I need? smlunatick typed (on Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:10:53AM -0700): | I was recommended to use 'rsync' for multi-site transfers. But I have | come to find that "rsync" does not exist already in OpenServer 5.0.5, | 5.0.6 and 5.0.7. You can only get the "source" files which you "must" | compile in order to create the "rsync." These seems to require that | you compile these on every level of OpenServer you need. | | Where / how can I get the 'rsync' binaries already compiled for the | levels I need? Get a binary for OSR 5.0.7, and with oss646c, it should run on 5.0.4, 5.0.5, and 5.0.6. Binary afavilable on Brian White's page at www.aljex.com/bkw. -- JP On Aug 18, 7:37=A0pm, Jean-Pierre Radley <j...@jpr.com> wrote: > smlunatick typed (on Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:10:53AM -0700): > | I was recommended to use 'rsync' for multi-site transfers. =A0But I hav= e > | come to find that "rsync" does not exist already in OpenSer...

Network 0.0.0.0 needed?
When redistributing a default route learned via EIGRP into BGP it seems the route will not propagate into the BGP table unless you have network 0.0.0.0 configured under BGP. Does anyone know why this is necessary? A safety measure perhaps? Thanks! You can also do this with a "neighbor x.x.x.x default-originate" command under "router bgp" BGP was designed for the Internet, where there is no default-route. Scott "Paul Thompson" <shinobi2@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:v5o2t2dpq2653k37q2ki830dsae2728n5q@4ax.com... > When redistributing a default route learned via EIGRP into BGP it > seems the route will not propagate into the BGP table unless you have > network 0.0.0.0 configured under BGP. Does anyone know why this is > necessary? A safety measure perhaps? > > Thanks! ...

ip 0.0.0.0 is attempting to ....
NIS2004 told me a remote computer at ip 0.0.0.0 is trying to access my computer, and asked if it should allow it. I'm thinking that is probably just the dsl modem and I should allow it. Can anyone confirm or instruct? "Adam Russell" <REMOVE_THIS_adamrussell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:<bro2a6$5lbqu$1@ID-122512.news.uni-berlin.de>... > NIS2004 told me a remote computer at ip 0.0.0.0 is trying to access my > computer, and asked if it should allow it. I'm thinking that is probably > just the dsl modem and I should allow it. Can anyone confirm or instruct? So is this the wrong newsgroup, or does no one know the answer? On 18-Dec-2003, adamrussell@sbcglobal.net (Adam Russell) wrote: > "Adam Russell" <REMOVE_THIS_adamrussell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > news:<bro2a6$5lbqu$1@ID-122512.news.uni-berlin.de>... > > NIS2004 told me a remote computer at ip 0.0.0.0 is trying to access my > > computer, and asked if it should allow it. I'm thinking that is > > probably > > just the dsl modem and I should allow it. Can anyone confirm or > > instruct? > > So is this the wrong newsgroup, or does no one know the answer? I do not know NIS2004, but the rule of thumb that makes the most sense to me is: When in doubt, block it. If things (access) still work then you are good, if it don't work, then you try allowing it. ...

route 0.0.0.0 twice
Hi, I some doubts question regarding a Cisco config. In the config I can see the following two lines: ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2 I know that these addresses are active in two interfaces. We had a 2Mbit connection that was upgraded to 4 Mbit. Our ISP told us to add the routes and that with those two routes we would be able to use the two links as one. Is this true with Cisco's CEF? My question is: 1. what's the route selected by the packets? Thanks, NC Nuno Cristelo wrote: > Hi, > > I some doubts question regarding a C...

what is telnet 0.0.0.0 supposed to do?
Hi all. on windows it seems to be an illegal address, on solaris/linux it gives you a login on the localhost. could someone point to some more info on 0.0.0.0 ? yes, I already googled. On Jul 30, 7:08=A0am, adirtymindisajoyforever <getridofthes...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi all. > > on windows it seems to be an illegal address, on solaris/linux it > gives you > a login on the localhost. > > could someone point to some more info on 0.0.0.0 ? In principle, if you mean 0.0.0.0 as a destination address, it could just as well be illegal. I don't t...

dhclient leasing 0.0.0.0
hi, OS: FreeBSD 4.9-Release im starting the dhclient at bootup from the rc.conf file. in the process list it shows as: /sbin/dhclient -pf /var/run/dhclient.ed1.pid ed1 the ipaddress leased shows: # ifconfig -a .... faith0: flags=8002<BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 ed1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0xff000000 broadcast 255.255.255.255 ether 00:02:dd:1f:10:89 after killing the dhclient process and starting it again with: # dhclient everything is fine and i get a working ipaddress. my dhcp config parameters in rc.conf are standard (sysinstall generated). Since my rc.firewall script automatically finds the ipaddress i will have to restart the firewall as well. Does someone have a clue how to persuade dhclient to find the right ip-address at bootup? Also there is no logentry leading to any problems with dhclient. Thanks in advance, sake. sake@snafu.de (sake) writes: > im starting the dhclient at bootup from the rc.conf file. > in the process list it shows as: > /sbin/dhclient -pf /var/run/dhclient.ed1.pid ed1 > the ipaddress leased shows: > # ifconfig -a > ... > faith0: flags=8002<BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > ed1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0xff000000 broadcast 255.255.255.255 > ether 00:02:dd:1f:10:89 > > after killing the dh...

Web resources about - SCO OpenServer RL5.0.0 License Expiration dilemma - comp.unix.sco.misc

SCO OpenServer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
6.0.0 MP4 / February 6, 2009 ; 5 years ago ( 2009-02-06 ) SCO UNIX was the successor to SCO variant of Microsoft Xenix , derived from UNIX System ...

Open Directory - Computers: Software: Operating Systems: Unix: SCO
... Inc. - Develops, supports small/mid scale Unix server OSs and business system software for network computing; products, related services: OpenServer, ...

关于Unix系统崩溃问题解决方法讲解_Unix子站_IT专家网
由于Unix系统是多用户多进程的分时系统,尤其是 SCO Unix OpenServer 5.0.5以上版本面市的时间不太长,许多系统管理员面对这种情况也没有解决办法,只好重装系统,导致大量的资料数据丢失。 关于Unix系统崩溃问题解决方法讲解

Deluded SCO CEO on witness stand: “Linux is a copy of UNIX”
Darl McBride entered a courtroom to assert his rights regarding legacy System …

SCO fees may hit some Linux users
The struggling SCO Group, which holds the copyright to Unix, plans to charge some customers who have moved from its own products to Linux, according ...

SCO puts disputed code in the spotlight
Technology launches take second place at SCO's confab to a defense of the legal battles against Linux, as the company displays the lines of code ...

S - Computer dictionary and glossary
Computer dictionary abbreviations, definitions, glossary, and terms beginning with the letter S.

When SCO is dead and buried
The end of SCO is in sight. And, what does that mean for us and what lessons can we learn from its frantic, fruitless battles against Linux? ...

Hard Disk Failure and Hard Drive Failure Data Recovery
Hard disk drives experience lots of different types of failure. Ranging from electrical, mechanical, logical and firmware. We can retrieve your ...

Serial Cards - Digi International
Products Embedded Wireless and Wired Solutions Solutions on Module RF Modules Single-Board Computers Operator Interfaces Software Platforms Application ...

Resources last updated: 3/26/2016 12:15:53 PM