f



Upgrade OSR 5.0.5 to 5.0.6 or 5.0.7

Hi all,

I've two olds servers DELL Poweredge 2300 with Raid PERC, funtionning
with OSR 5.0.5.

Iwant upgrade the OS to 5.0.6 or 5.0.7 but it seems (sco.com) that the
poweredge 2300 is bnot supported after OSR 5.0.5 (Hardware
comptatibility).

has somebody attempt this with success and which drivers (Raid PERC,
Adaptec) are used.

Thank you in advance fir the help.

-----------------------------------------------------
Andre Georgel

Email : andre.georgel@noos.fr

"La perfection n'est pas lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien �
ajouter, mais lorsque qu'il n'y a plus rien � enlever."
"Perfection is not when there is nothing to add, but
when there is nothing to remove."

(A. de Saint Exupery)
------------------------------------------------------


0
12/10/2003 10:25:06 AM
comp.unix.sco.misc 3925 articles. 0 followers. Post Follow

1 Replies
1729 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 39

On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 10:25:06 +0000, Andre Georgel
<andre.georgel@mareduspam.com> wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>I've two olds servers DELL Poweredge 2300 with Raid PERC, funtionning
>with OSR 5.0.5.
>
>Iwant upgrade the OS to 5.0.6 or 5.0.7 but it seems (sco.com) that the
>poweredge 2300 is bnot supported after OSR 5.0.5 (Hardware
>comptatibility).
>
>has somebody attempt this with success and which drivers (Raid PERC,
>Adaptec) are used.
>
>Thank you in advance fir the help.
>
>-----------------------------------------------------
>Andre Georgel
>
>Email : andre.georgel@noos.fr
>
>"La perfection n'est pas lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien �
>ajouter, mais lorsque qu'il n'y a plus rien � enlever."
>"Perfection is not when there is nothing to add, but
>when there is nothing to remove."
>
>(A. de Saint Exupery)
>------------------------------------------------------
>
Dell admits there are problems with their PERC2s and PERC3s
and have no fixes for SCO OS.  We dumped all our PERCs
and went to Adaptec 2110s Controllers @ 350 a pop.  
Faster and no more strange crashes anymore.  Best money
and time we ever spent.



0
Jerry56 (37)
12/11/2003 2:29:23 PM
Reply:

Similar Artilces:

Upgrading 5.0.5 to 5.0.6/5.0.7
Hi, I've inheirited 3 SCO Servers and need to upgrade one to 5.0.6 from 5.0.5. The other two are at 5.0.6 and I want them all in line. Some questions: 1. Does SCO charge for this upgrade? If so, how much? 2. How easy is the upgrade? 3. Should I go to 5.0.7 instead for all the machines? Thanks, Jon Jon Wynacht typed (on Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 09:16:17AM -0700): | Hi, | | I've inheirited 3 SCO Servers and need to upgrade one to 5.0.6 from | 5.0.5. The other two are at 5.0.6 and I want them all in line. Some | questions: | | 1. Does SCO charge for this upgrade? If so, how much? >From 5.0.5 Enterprise to 5.0.7 Enterprise, $599. >From 5.0.6 Enterprise to 5.0.7 Enterprise, $369. | 2. How easy is the upgrade? Not hard; be sure to use ftp.jpr.com/pub/savefiles. | 3. Should I go to 5.0.7 instead for all the machines? Yes, and when you order the upgrades, also add in SCO Update, which will eventually bring you all the changes that bring you the Legend release. -- JP Jon Wynacht wrote: > Hi, > > I've inheirited 3 SCO Servers and need to upgrade one to 5.0.6 from > 5.0.5. The other two are at 5.0.6 and I want them all in line. Some > questions: > > 1. Does SCO charge for this upgrade? If so, how much? Of course. See http://aplawrence.com/scoprices.html > 2. How easy is the upgrade? Usually painless, but see http://aplawrence.com/Unixart/upgrades.html > 3. Should I go to 5.0.7 instead for all the machines? Yes, no questi...

Looking for precompiled 'rsync" for SCO 5.0.5, 5.0.6 and 5.0.7
I was recommended to use 'rsync' for multi-site transfers. But I have come to find that "rsync" does not exist already in OpenServer 5.0.5, 5.0.6 and 5.0.7. You can only get the "source" files which you "must" compile in order to create the "rsync." These seems to require that you compile these on every level of OpenServer you need. Where / how can I get the 'rsync' binaries already compiled for the levels I need? smlunatick typed (on Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:10:53AM -0700): | I was recommended to use 'rsync' for multi-site transfers. But I have | come to find that "rsync" does not exist already in OpenServer 5.0.5, | 5.0.6 and 5.0.7. You can only get the "source" files which you "must" | compile in order to create the "rsync." These seems to require that | you compile these on every level of OpenServer you need. | | Where / how can I get the 'rsync' binaries already compiled for the | levels I need? Get a binary for OSR 5.0.7, and with oss646c, it should run on 5.0.4, 5.0.5, and 5.0.6. Binary afavilable on Brian White's page at www.aljex.com/bkw. -- JP On Aug 18, 7:37=A0pm, Jean-Pierre Radley <j...@jpr.com> wrote: > smlunatick typed (on Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:10:53AM -0700): > | I was recommended to use 'rsync' for multi-site transfers. =A0But I hav= e > | come to find that "rsync" does not exist already in OpenSer...

Licensing question 5.0.4 - 5.0.6
We need to upgrade a backup server from 5.0.4 to 5.0.6 (same as live server). Our supplier told us that a base pack upgrade for 5.0.6 is not available and we would have to have 5.0.7. This version of Sco is not certified compatible with our server. Does anyone know if we can install 5.0.7 licences on 5.0.6? Also it feels like the supplier is telling stories to force us into buying a new server. Does anyone know if 5.0.6 base packs are available? Thanks for your help Regards BB p.s. anonymity preserved to prevent Spam. Bigbyte typed (on Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 04:22:53PM +0100): | We need to upgrade a backup server from 5.0.4 to 5.0.6 (same as live | server). Our supplier told us that a base pack upgrade for 5.0.6 is not | available and we would have to have 5.0.7. This version of Sco is not | certified compatible with our server. Does anyone know if we can install | 5.0.7 licences on 5.0.6? No. But why would you want to? | Also it feels like the supplier is telling stories to force us into buying a | new server. Does anyone know if 5.0.6 base packs are available? What do you mean by a "base pack"? -- JP On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Bigbyte wrote: > We need to upgrade a backup server from 5.0.4 to 5.0.6 (same as live > server). Our supplier told us that a base pack upgrade for 5.0.6 is not > available and we would have to have 5.0.7. This version of Sco is not > certified compatible with our server. Does anyone know if we can install > 5.0.7 licenc...

Sco OpenServer upgrading 5.0.6 to 5.0.7
I need some help. I need to upgrade my Sco O.S.506 to 507 and told me that I need to reinstall all the operative system and not the upgrading of it. Is it true ? Thanks in advance and excuse me if before someone alredy answered this query but I do not find anything about this matter bye Roberto Pineapple typed (on Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 01:39:46PM +0200): | I need some help. | I need to upgrade my Sco O.S.506 to 507 and told me that I need to reinstall | all the operative system and not the upgrading of it. | Is it true ? No. | Thanks in advance and excuse me if before someone alredy answered this query | but I do not find anything about this matter While In-Place Upgrades do now work considerably better than they did a few years ago, I *still* counsel against them. Use my savefiles script, make good backups, and then a fresh install. -- JP "Pineapple" <roberquaNO@SPAMvirgilio.it> wrote in message news:<c50pa5$vri$1@newsreader.mailgate.org>... > I need some help. > I need to upgrade my Sco O.S.506 to 507 and told me that I need to reinstall > all the operative system and not the upgrading of it. > Is it true ? > Thanks in advance and excuse me if before someone alredy answered this query > but I do not find anything about this matter > > bye > Roberto I had same problem, and I was unable to upgrade . Only fresh reinstall was Ok. Pineapple <roberquaNO@spamvirgilio.it> wrote: >I need some help. >I need to...

NFS SCo 5.0.5 with SCO 6.0.0
Hi everybody, I have a folder on SCO 5.0.5 server shared through NFS with a new SCO 6.0.0 with MP2 server (converted from a SCO 5.0.6 version). Before conversion file locks (over network) on this folder works well (eg from server SCO 5.0.6 I was able to see locks generated from SCO 5.0.5 box and viceversa), now with SCO 6.0.0 does not work ! I see that on SCO 6.0.0 the lockd daemon is active .. so it should work ... Please can you help me ? Thanks Cuffiette ...

Upgrading 5.0.5 Host To 5.0.7 Enterprise
Hello, What are the flaming hoops I need to jump through to upgrade a 5.0.5 Host to 5.0.7 Enterprise? I've tried to do some net research on my own on this and it's darn confusing to a newbie to UNIX like myself. It looks like I have to first purchase an upgrade to 5.0.6 Host or 5.0.7 Host and then I can get a trade-in/upgrade to 5.0.7 Enterprise? WTF? Thanks for any help! Ian Motterman wrote: > Hello, > > What are the flaming hoops I need to jump through to upgrade > a 5.0.5 Host to 5.0.7 Enterprise? > > I've tried to do some net research on my own on this and it's darn confusing > to a newbie to UNIX like myself. It looks like I have to first purchase an > upgrade to 5.0.6 Host or 5.0.7 Host and then I can get a trade-in/upgrade > to 5.0.7 Enterprise? WTF? > It's less awful than it seems. The path is indeed upgrade to 5.0.7 host and then upgrade that to Enterprise. In practice, the first upgrade is the one where things can go wrong (if at all) and the second is trivial. -- Tony Lawrence > Thanks for any help! > > Ian ...

SCSI tape not working after upgrade 5.0.5 -> 5.0.7
Good day, After an upgrade of SCO OpenServer 5.0.5 running on Dell PowerEdge 2400 to 5.0.7 we found the tape drive does not work. In "mkdev tape", when you go view the installed tape drives it lists none. But if you try to create a new one, it can't: ---snip--- You are about to add the following SCSI device: Host Adapter Type Adapter Device Number ID LUN Bus ------------------------------------------------------- SCSI alad tape 0 6 0 0 Update SCSI configuration? (y/n) y Cannot add this tape. Another tape is already configured at this location. SCSI configuration files not updated. ---snip--- If I try to remove a SCSI tape, it says there aren't any. Yes, the SCSI details are correct. The device is plugged in and working properly - just before the upgrade a full backup was done, and verified too. The device details appear correctly in the mscsi file, the kernel was relinked. Some random bits of information about the system follow: # uname -a SCO_SV phmas 3.2 5.0.7 i386 # dmesg <snip> %Stp-0 - - - Vnd=ARCHIVE Prd=Python 04106-XXX Rev=7350 # sconf -v Srom alad 0 0 5 0 Stp alad 0 0 6 0 Sdsk perc 0 0 0 0 unknown perc 0 0 6 0 # ls -l /dev/*ct0 crw-rw-rw- 5 root root 46, 8 Sep 15 17:43 /dev/nrct0 crw-rw-rw- 5 root root 46, 0 Sep 15 17:43 /dev/rct0 crw...

5.0.5: uname -a shows 5.0.6 ?!
Hello, where gets "uname -a" the 5.0.6 info ? uname -a: SCO_SV hostname 3.2 5.0.6 i386 uname -X: System = SCO_SV Node = hostname Release = 3.2v5.0.5 KernelID = 98/07/02 Machine = PentII(D) BusType = ISA Serial = 4FI018581 Users = 130-user OEM# = 0 Origin# = 1 NumCPU = 2 truss doesn't helps. Regards, S.Marquardt Stefan Marquardt wrote: > where gets "uname -a" the 5.0.6 info ? > uname -a: > > SCO_SV hostname 3.2 5.0.6 i386 > > uname -X: > > System = SCO_SV > Node = hostname > Release = 3.2v5.0.5 > KernelID = 98/07/02 > Machine = PentII(D) > BusType = ISA > Serial = 4FI018581 > Users = 130-user > OEM# = 0 > Origin# = 1 > NumCPU = 2 > > truss doesn't helps. `uname -a` uses the uname(S) system call; `uname -X` uses __scoinfo(S). You can see the respective structures by doing: # scodb scodb> d &utsname scodb> d &scoutsname scodb> q The structures are initialized in /etc/conf/pack.d/kernel/space.c. `uname -v` comes from VER, which is #defined in kernel/space.c; `uname -X` Release comes from SCORELEASE, which is #defined in /etc/conf/cf.d/version.h. You can see how the two could get out of sync. >Bela< ...

SCO 5.0.5/5.0.6 bios clock, time zone and synching
Hi All, Does SCO expect the BIOS clock to be set to UTC? Ive got a few SCO boxen spread across a couple of time zones and at the moment, the bios clocks in the servers are set to localtime not UTC. The timezone settings in SCO Admin are also wrong. I was under the impression *nix always expects the BIOS clock to be set to UTC and then the timezone settings in SCO tell the OS what the local time is. This does not seem to be the case for me. On a testing box, Ive set the BIOS clock to UTC, set the correct timezone in scoadmin but the date command in a root shell still gives the wrong time. Either the timezone information in scoadmin for my timezone is wrong and I need to set up an unlisted timezone (which I can do easily enough) or im missing something more fundamental here. Anyone care to wield a clue-bat? cheers John Smith wrote: > Does SCO expect the BIOS clock to be set to UTC? > > Ive got a few SCO boxen spread across a couple of time zones and at > the moment, the bios clocks in the servers are set to localtime not > UTC. > The timezone settings in SCO Admin are also wrong. > > I was under the impression *nix always expects the BIOS clock to be > set to UTC and then the timezone settings in SCO tell the OS what the > local time is. > This does not seem to be the case for me. > On a testing box, Ive set the BIOS clock to UTC, set the correct > timezone in scoadmin but the date command in a root shell still gives > the wro...

In-Place Upgrade of SCO OpenServer 5.0.4 to 5.0.7
I will attempt this upgrade in a few days. Has anyone on this forum done this? Any pitfalls? Any problems? I checked SCO's tech article data base and found articles 11293 ("An in-place upgrade from OpenServer 5.0.4 to 5.0.5 and then on to 5.06 fails"), 112523 ("I upgraded from OpenServer 5.0.x to OpenServer 5.0.6 and my files from /usr/local are missing"), 105664 ("The Internet FastStart package did not install after an in-place upgrade to OpenServer Enterprise Release 5.0.4 or 5.0.5"), and 11542 ("I get kernel relink errors when trying to install Merge 5 on SCO OpenServer 5"). Are these various problems fixed with 5.0.7? Are there any other tech articles I should be aware of? Regards, Ronald W. Satz SCO UNIX Authorized and Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer Transpower Corporation transpower@aol.com www.transpowercorp.com Transpower <transpower@aol.com> wrote: >I will attempt this upgrade in a few days. Has anyone on this forum done this? Well, in my opinion that's too far back for an IPU. It might very well work, but 5.0.4 is pretty ancient and you are bound to have accumulated a lot of cruft over the years. I'd fresh install: http://aplawrence.com/Unixart/upgrades.html -- tony@aplawrence.com Unix/Linux/Mac OS X resources: http://aplawrence.com Get paid for writing about tech: http://aplawrence.com/publish.html ...

SATA on 5.0.6 or 5.0.7?
Anyone running SCO 5.0.6 or 5.0.7 on servers with SATA drives? I'd like to hear from anyone with SATA based servers and if they met their exceptions for performance and reliability. In the past, I have always used SCSI drives for the performance and customary 5 year warrantee. Now SATA drives are available with 5 year warrantee and manufactures claim the drives are equivalent to SCSI performance at 40% less cost. I have checked my distributors and all the SATA drives I can find are 7200 RPM with the exception of the 36G WD360GD 10k RPM SATA drive. I have a request from a client running SCO 3.2v4.2 on 66 MHz 486 with 4G disk to upgrade to current hardware and OS. SCSI is overkill for this client and the 36G WD looks like a good choice. I'll eliminate all SCSI by using Backup Edge writing to a ATAPI DVD-RAM and upgrade the client to 5.0.6 or 5.0.7 (SCO's web site suggests it has upgrades to Enterprise 6.0 from Xenix/UNIX but there is no part number listed and inquiries come up: Not Available). -- Steve Fabac S.M. Fabac & Associates 816/765-1670 I have switched over most of my small server installs over to SATA raid using the intel SRCS16 raid controller and the 10K 36 gig raptor drives. So far other then one of the cables breaking off the connector during shipping, I have not had any probelms. On the smaller system running aro...

SCO 5.0.5 vs. 6.0
I'm having a new server built: SuperMicro P4SC8 Mother Board Intel P4 3.0Ghz 800 FSB 1GB CPU 73GB 10K 80 PIN SCSI Drive Sony 20/40GB DAT Drive SDT11000/BN DDS4 Adaptec 2010S Card for Mirroring Comtrol Rockport Card 99126-7 Is there any reason I should update my current version of SCO 5.0.5? Frank The following article is a recommendation from SCO when using P4 http://www.sco.com/ta/115963 "FrankS" <fshank@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:CqT_f.65026$H71.37215@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com... > I'm having a new server built: > > SuperMicro P4SC8 Mother Board > Intel P4 3.0Ghz 800 FSB 1GB CPU > 73GB 10K 80 PIN SCSI Drive > Sony 20/40GB DAT Drive SDT11000/BN DDS4 > > Adaptec 2010S Card for Mirroring > > Comtrol Rockport Card 99126-7 > > > > Is there any reason I should update my current version of SCO 5.0.5? > > > > Frank > > > > > > FrankS wrote: > I'm having a new server built: > > SuperMicro P4SC8 Mother Board > Intel P4 3.0Ghz 800 FSB 1GB CPU > 73GB 10K 80 PIN SCSI Drive > Sony 20/40GB DAT Drive SDT11000/BN DDS4 > > Adaptec 2010S Card for Mirroring > > Comtrol Rockport Card 99126-7 > > > > Is there any reason I should update my current version of SCO 5.0.5? Frank, OpenServer 5.0.5 is a retired product and is no longer generally supported by SCO. OpenServer 5.0.5 is not designed to work on P4 systems and y...

if time = 3 seconds, how do i set the values of the time steps 0,0.1,0.2,0.3,0.5,1.0,1.5,2.0,3.0,5.0 to -9999 from time =3 seconds
Hi &nbsp; I have 18 inputs (arrays) which contain certain statistics and if time&nbsp;&nbsp;= 3 seconds, set the values of time step 5.0 to -9999.0. &nbsp; I was wondering if there is an efficient way to do this without using a lot of case statements? &nbsp; Thank you. Hello AdrianT, it's not really clear to me what you want to do... I suspect: you have an array containing values and you want to output them with a fixed timing of 3 seconds: you should use a for loop autoindexing trough your array and sending the value to your indicator/output/whatever. Put a "wait for next multiple" into your for loop. Or do you want to have a minimum time delay of 3 seconds? Again use a for loop, get the time value and use a InRange&amp;Coerce with minimum set to 3 seconds... Or you should explain more precisely what you need... Hi Thanks for that. Let me explain. &nbsp; The time may vary. Let me give an example. if time&nbsp; = 2.1, I want to set the time step's &nbsp;3.0 and 5.0's values to -9999.0. if the time =0.1 seconds then I want to set 0.2,0.3, 0.5 etc values to -9999.0 etc .................................................................... &nbsp; Can you please help? Thank you. Hello TUDS, do you use different accounts/nicknames ? Well, that's easy, at least for a sorted array: Search for your time-value in the array (Threshold 1D array). Fill all elements from that index till the end with your "error...

moving printers from 5.0.6 to 5.0.7
I have a whole lot of printers attached to ttys(specialix multi serial ports) on SCO 5.0.6, I am setting up a new server with 5.0.7 is there an easy way to move the printers configurations from 5.0.6 to 5.0.7 e,g Can I just copy /usr/spool/lp/*/lp from 5.0.6 to 5.0.7, would that make all my printers appear in 5.0.7 Many thanks denn.el@gmail.com typed (on Mon, May 21, 2007 at 06:39:27AM -0700): | I have a whole lot of printers attached to ttys(specialix multi serial | ports) on SCO 5.0.6, I am setting up a new server with 5.0.7 is there | an easy way to move the printers configurations from 5.0.6 to 5.0.7 | e,g Can I just copy /usr/spool/lp/*/lp from 5.0.6 to 5.0.7, would that | make all my printers appear in 5.0.7 I think I've done exactly that... -- JP ==> http://www.frappr.com/cusm <== On May 21, 5:54 pm, Jean-Pierre Radley <j...@jpr.com> wrote: > denn...@gmail.com typed (on Mon, May 21, 2007 at 06:39:27AM -0700): > | I have a whole lot of printers attached to ttys(specialix multi serial > | ports) on SCO 5.0.6, I am setting up a new server with 5.0.7 is there > | an easy way to move the printers configurations from 5.0.6 to 5.0.7 > | e,g Can I just copy /usr/spool/lp/*/lp from 5.0.6 to 5.0.7, would that > | make all my printers appear in 5.0.7 > > I think I've done exactly that... > > -- > JP > ==>http://www.frappr.com/cusm<== thanks ...

Re: SATA on 5.0.6 or 5.0.7?
: "Steve M. Fabac, Jr." <smfabac@att.net> wrote in message : news:4325B488.908204F5@att.net... : > Anyone running SCO 5.0.6 or 5.0.7 on servers with : > SATA drives? : > : > I'd like to hear from anyone with SATA based servers and if : > they met their exceptions for performance and reliability. : > : > In the past, I have always used SCSI drives for the performance : > and customary 5 year warrantee. Now SATA drives are available with : > 5 year warrantee and manufactures claim the drives are equivalent : > to SCSI performance at 40% less cost. : > : > I have checked my distributors and all the SATA drives I can find : > are 7200 RPM with the exception of the 36G WD360GD 10k RPM SATA : > drive. : > : > I have a request from a client running SCO 3.2v4.2 on 66 MHz 486 : > with 4G disk to upgrade to current hardware and OS. : > : > SCSI is overkill for this client and the 36G WD looks like a : > good choice. I'll eliminate all SCSI by using Backup Edge : > writing to a ATAPI DVD-RAM and upgrade the client to : > 5.0.6 or 5.0.7 (SCO's web site suggests it has upgrades to : > Enterprise 6.0 from Xenix/UNIX but there is no part number : > listed and inquiries come up: Not Available). : > : > : > -- : > : > Steve Fabac : > S.M. Fabac & Associates : > ...

SYbase SQL & SCO OpenServer 5.0.4/5.0.5
Can somone help me with wich SQL versions runs on SCO OSR5.0.4 and SCO OSR 5.0.5? So your the customer SCO still has :-) Sorry.. Couldn't resist ! ASE 10.0.2 was certified on SCO OSR5.0.2 with OS patches SLS 422a, SLS 437a. It wasn't certified on anything higher. ASE 11.0.x was certified on 5.0.4, but nothing higher. Sybase doesn't support 10.x or 11.x any more ...

Sybase and Openserver 5.0.4/5.0.5
Can somone give me information about what Sybase Sql version that runs on OSR5.0.4 and OSR5.0.5 etc? ...

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
Time for a new Cartoon character sock - no? On 8/16/11 1:16 PM, Redjak wrote: > Time for a new cartoon character sock, no? Any suggestions Olive Oyl? "Chance Furlong" wrote in message news:a9idnQpR6J6abtfTnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d@giganews.com... On 8/16/11 1:16 PM, Redjak wrote: > Time for a new cartoon character sock, no? >Any suggestions Olive Oyl? Yeah - something stupid, as usual. ...

[ANN] Rails 0.7.0, Action Pack 0.8.5, Active Record 0.9.5
I gather that most people are now familar with the RoR suite, so I'm skipping the formal introductions and will just bring you the meat. Get it all from http://www.rubyonrails.org, talk it up on #rubyonrails (FreeNet). Or even easier, just do "gem install rails" (or "gem update" if you're already running on Gem Rails) -- you'll automatically install all the newest versions of the required dependencies. Rails 0.7.0: Fixed WEBrick, new_model generator, easier fixtures ================================================================ The WEBrick dispatch has...

Should I fear an upgrade from 5.0 to.. 5.1 or 5.5 on a CentOS box?
I've just been handed a CentOS 5.1 , WHM/Cpanel server to maintain, it's running MySQL 5.0 which powers a few Forum/CMS type sites.. I really need to upgrade MySQL, because until I do, WHM/CPanel upgrades aren't possible.. How scary is this? Likelyhood of scripts like SMF, Wordpress etc breaking? How much time involved? Minutes, hours days? Any insight would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance On 11/6/2013 2:26 PM, dewed wrote: > I've just been handed a CentOS 5.1 , WHM/Cpanel server to maintain, it's running MySQL 5.0 which powers a few Fo...

SCO Open Server 5.0.6 versus 5.0.4
Hi, Anybody can point me to info or can state if there is a performance improvement from running 5.0.6 versus 5.0.4. Application is database access centered. Regards, Marian news wrote: > Hi, > Anybody can point me to info or can state if there is a performance > improvement from running 5.0.6 versus 5.0.4. Application is database access > centered. I don't think you are going to get a useful answer. Let's assume that I could authoritatively say that 5.0.6 has performance related improvements over .4 in certain areas. I can't recall if it does or doesn't, but the release notes would surely mention any. But so what? What does that say about YOUR application? Do we know where its performance issuees are now? Nope. We could assume it's probably disk bound, because that's a pretty safe assumption most any time, but even if true, what have you done for better or worse in that regard already? Maybe this is an Oracle database and you have it running on a RAID 5 system. As that's usually going to be a bad idea, you could gain nothing even if 5.0.6 did otherwise provide features that would otherwise improve your lot. Maybe you have the whole thing improperly tuned. Maybe you have it so perfectly tuned that an upgrade would make it worse because everything is so critically balanced to what you have now.. There are plenty of good reasons to upgrade to 5.0.6/7. If that's what you are lookimg for (a reason to sell the idea to ...

[ace-users] ACE+TAO+CIAO
Hi all, We are pleased to announce the latest ACE+TAO+CIAO beta. This beta has been tagged ACE+TAO+CIAO-5_5_6. The main difference between this release and x.5.5 is that the ACE exception macros (except for ACE_THROW_RETURN and ACE_THROW_SPEC) have been removed from all TAO and CIAO code. It is available from the same download location as per the previous release. http://download.dre.vanderbilt.edu/ The doxygen documentation for the beta is also available. Included with this beta, besides the packages combined of sources and generate makefiles, we also provide source only packages for the group of users which use MPC to generate their own makefiles. We encourage you to download the new beta, use it with your applications, and let us know if you encounter any problems. Please use the: $ACE_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $TAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM $CIAO_ROOT/PROBLEM-REPORT-FORM so that we have the proper version/platform/compiler/options you're using to report problems. We also request that you take a look at: $TAO_ROOT/docs/releasenotes/ for the status of various ongoing projects at the DOC groups of WashU, UCI, and Vanderbilt to move ACE+TAO+CIAO forward. Overviews of our recent progress and upcoming plans are available at: $ACE_ROOT/NEWS $TAO_ROOT/NEWS $CIAO_ROOT/NEWS The overall success rates for the test results gathered from all our daily builds is 96% for the ACE tests and 92% for the TAO tests. Please see: http://ww...

SCO Caldera v3.2.5.07 and Enterprise 5.0.7 3.2v5.0.7
I have 2 different software applications. We are considering moving both to a single server sunning sco. One vendor says they will only run on SCO caldera v 3.2.2.07 the other says they will only run on enterprise 5.0.7 3.2v5.0.7 I am confused, are these 2 different os's or just versions of the same os. Can someone enlighten me? gerard typed (on Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 11:34:45AM -0800): | I have 2 different software applications. | We are considering moving both to a single server sunning sco. | One vendor says they will only run on SCO caldera v 3.2.2.07 There is no such version as 3.2.2.07. | the other says they will only run on enterprise 5.0.7 3.2v5.0.7 This is the latest release of SCO Openserver. -- JP gerardm@schurmans.com (gerard) wrote in message news:<97c6f92f.0310311134.2227a2c@posting.google.com>... > I have 2 different software applications. > We are considering moving both to a single server sunning sco. > One vendor says they will only run on SCO caldera v 3.2.2.07 > the other says they will only run on enterprise 5.0.7 3.2v5.0.7 > > I am confused, are these 2 different os's or just versions of the same os. > Can someone enlighten me? They both are the same, SCO UNIX 3.2V5.7 (enterprise). Abid ...

Free Dev Sys License (5.0.4 or 5.0.5)
Anybody need a Free(*) Openserver devsys license? It's from around the time of 5.0.4 or 5.0.5. But it should work up through 5.0.6, (by serializing ld and cc manually - those are the only two items that the license unlocks). Number: 2GA026600 Code: nxljpcpn Data: g0;k;mddh5m7 The license is not in use and is legit. Or as legit as can be after posting the activation info to Usenet. First one to email me gets the COLA VIA snail mail. And my condolences. -sw On Jan 24, 12:58=A0pm, Sqwertz <swe...@cluemail.compost> wrote: > Anybody need a Free(*) Openserver d...

Web resources about - Upgrade OSR 5.0.5 to 5.0.6 or 5.0.7 - comp.unix.sco.misc

H-1 upgrade program - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The H-1 upgrade program refers to the United States Marine Corps 's program to develop the AH-1Z Viper and UH-1Y Venom to replace its aging fleets ...


Tumblr Referrals From Facebook Up 2.5X Following Upgrade For Timeline
Since upgrading for timeline and launching with open graph in April, Tumblr has seen its referral traffic from Facebook rise by more than 2.5 ...

Update on Android Ice Cream Sandwich upgrades
HTC has been working hard to get its Ice Cream Sandwich upgrades ready, and we’re excited to announce that our first round of ICS upgrades will ...

Facebook Platform Upgrade Guide
Upgrade instructions for Facebook's platform across versions.

Facebook Allows Users to Upgrade to the New Messages Product, Why You Should
Some users are seeing a prompt when they visit their Facebook Messages inbox allowing them to upgrade to the New Messages product launched in ...

Search Twitter - upgrade
... here Search Refresh julia @ d0gbones 3m I laughed at the call handler when he told me it'd be £400 to stay on my current price plan and upgrade ...

Todo 6 (for devices that cannot upgrade to version 7) on the App Store on iTunes
Get Todo 6 (for devices that cannot upgrade to version 7) on the App Store. See screenshots and ratings, and read customer reviews.

Desktop Audio Upgrade - Flickr - Photo Sharing!
I needed some new speakers for my desktop computer system at home. I've been tolerating JBL creature 2.1 system for a couple of years now and ...

How to Upgrade your MacBook PRO to a SSD (Solid State Hard Drive) - YouTube
Follow me on twitter : http://twitter.com/sakitechonline Follow me on facebook: http://goo.gl/R95Pq Website: http://www.sakitechonline.com Create ...

Resources last updated: 3/26/2016 1:16:26 PM