how to log Rexec login in solaris 9?

  • Follow


I know those R daemons have been way out of day, but the problem is we are 
still using it.

We use PC X server software to connect to solaris 9/10, and there is no log 
for rexec.

Just want to find out how to log rexec connection.

Thanks. 


0
Reply steeles 1/18/2007 4:06:14 PM

steeles wrote:

> Just want to find out how to log rexec connection.

Enable tcp-wrappers to log the connections, but it will not show you the rexec 
commands, just the ip address where they come from.
To log the commands you might need a customized version of the rexec daemon, you 
could start with GNU rexecd, part of GNU inetutils, the source code is only 9k.
0
Reply Oscar 1/18/2007 6:45:12 PM


Hello steeles,

steeles schrieb/wrote:

> I know those R daemons have been way out of day, but the problem is we are 
> still using it.
>
> We use PC X server software to connect to solaris 9/10, and there is no log 
> for rexec.

X11 sonnections also work fine when being tunneled using SSH...

Regards,
Christian
-- 
Christian Schmidt | Germany | ChriSchmiLi@gmx.de
No HTML Mails, please!!
De eene hett 'n Rittergut, de annere ritt 'n Gitter rut.
0
Reply Christian 1/18/2007 9:37:21 PM

Thanks for the help.

I could change setting on /etc/default/inetd to enable tcp-wrapper, and for 
customized rexcec daemon, you mean to use "-t" for starting inetd?
Are all the rexec logs going to /var/adm/messages ?

"Oscar del Rio" <delrio@mie.utoronto.ca> wrote in message 
news:eoof7p$8i5$1@news.mie...
> steeles wrote:
>
>> Just want to find out how to log rexec connection.
>
> Enable tcp-wrappers to log the connections, but it will not show you the 
> rexec commands, just the ip address where they come from.
> To log the commands you might need a customized version of the rexec 
> daemon, you could start with GNU rexecd, part of GNU inetutils, the source 
> code is only 9k. 


0
Reply steeles 1/19/2007 1:33:36 PM

3 Replies
480 Views

(page loaded in 0.064 seconds)

Similiar Articles:













7/23/2012 3:59:46 PM


Reply: