Is there some IPS 'pkg' invokation, that gets me an emacs binary, without pulling in all the gtk stuff?
I just want text-mode emacs.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
phil178 (85)
|
5/22/2012 3:12:44 PM |
|
Philip Brown <phil@bolthole.com> writes:
> Is there some IPS 'pkg' invokation, that gets me an emacs binary, without pulling in all the gtk stuff?
> I just want text-mode emacs.
What's wrong with the choice between emacs-gtk, emacs-nox and emacs-x,
with the corresponding packages editor/gnu-emacs/gnu-emacs-{gtk, no-x11,
x11}?
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
ro1144 (2)
|
5/22/2012 3:22:03 PM
|
|
On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 8:22:03 AM UTC-7, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Philip Brown
> writes:
>
> > Is there some IPS 'pkg' invokation, that gets me an emacs binary, without pulling in all the gtk stuff?
> > I just want text-mode emacs.
>
> What's wrong with the choice between emacs-gtk, emacs-nox and emacs-x,
> with the corresponding packages editor/gnu-emacs/gnu-emacs-{gtk, no-x11,
> x11}?
>
That sounds very promising. I just didnt see it when I did a pkg search, for some reason.
Probably because "pkg search emacs" gives too many results, and
pkg search basename:emacs
only shows up
pkg:/editor/gnu-emacs@23.1-0.175.0.0.0.2.537
as something that looks useful
But now that I go back and recheck a different way, with,
pkg list -a '*emacs*'
does indeed show
editor/gnu-emacs/gnu-emacs-no-x11
Thanks a bunch!
Side note to the IPS guys who may or may probably be not be reading this:
pkg search basename:emacs yields
pkg:/editor/gnu-emacs -> usr/bin/emacs
It should really belong to something named similar to
"editor/gnu-emacs/common"
or something like that.
It's confusing to have separate "nested" packages,
pkg:/editor/gnu-emacs which seems to delivers binaries, AND
pkg:/editor/gnu-emacs/gnu-emacs-no-x11, which also delivers binaries.
They should be at the same level
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
phil178 (85)
|
5/22/2012 4:56:34 PM
|
|
followup question:
Now that I have the knowledge of this "no-x11" version of gnu-emacs... anyone know how can I get rid of the 60+ packages that got pulled in for the x version?
Sadly, removing the culprit that triggered their installation, does not seem to have triggered their UNinstallation :(
Basically, I'd like a way to cleanly and efficiently remove all the X related packages.
sadly, neither
pkg uninstall consolidation/desktop/desktop-incorporation
nor
pkg uninstall consolidation/desktop/gnome-incorporation
works. I think those things are "install only" type objects :(
Side comment:
pkg uninstall desktop-incorporation
[cannot remove due to following pkgs that depend on it]
pkg://solaris/library/ncurses@5.7,5.11-0.175.0.0.0.0.0:20110927T105727Z
WTH??? !?? What moron decided to make ncurses, depend on "desktop-incorporation" ?
or "groff-core", for that matter?
How do those things break, if a "desktop", aka GUI, is not present???
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
phil178 (85)
|
5/22/2012 5:51:12 PM
|
|
Philip Brown <phil@bolthole.com> writes:
>followup question:
>Now that I have the knowledge of this "no-x11" version of gnu-emacs... anyone know how can I get rid of the 60+ packages that got pulled in for the x version?
>Sadly, removing the culprit that triggered their installation, does not seem to have triggered their UNinstallation :(
>Basically, I'd like a way to cleanly and efficiently remove all the X related packages.
Use pkg history with the proper option; this will give you all the newly installed
packages. Then you should be able to remove them.
But really you should have made a new be or a backupbe and revert to that :-)
Casper
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Casper.Dik2 (264)
|
5/22/2012 6:07:13 PM
|
|
On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 11:07:13 AM UTC-7, Casper H. S. Dik wrote:
> Philip Brown
> writes:
>
> >Basically, I'd like a way to cleanly and efficiently remove all the X related packages. [that were pulled in by installing emacs]
>
> Use pkg history with the proper option; this will give you all the newly installed
> packages. Then you should be able to remove them.
Ooo, interesting. I had forgotten about "pkg history". but even if I remmebered, I did not realize it kept an operations history, not just a "what you typed" history. Nice! Thanks, Casper
And for the benefit of other folks, the option is "-l"
ALthough it is advisable to use "pkg history" first, to pick a timestamp, an then use
pkg history -l -t timestamp
to avoid getting flooded TOO bady.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
phil178 (85)
|
5/22/2012 7:57:04 PM
|
|
Philip Brown <phil@bolthole.com> wrote:
> Is there some IPS 'pkg' invokation, that gets me an emacs binary, without pulling in all the gtk stuff?
> I just want text-mode emacs.
jed?
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
presence (537)
|
5/24/2012 2:25:10 AM
|
|
|
6 Replies
75 Views
(page loaded in 0.117 seconds)
Similiar Articles: KEA and SSH 6
295  contracer11 7/23/2012 10:29:51 AM
|