Networking solaris 10 on x86I have two nic cards. elxl0 and elxl1.
elxl0 is assigned dhcp from my cable modem and I am able to surf
internet fine no worries.
I want to have elxl1 send the internet out to the rest of my network.
I am new to solaris and do not know how to do this. I used to use nat
and ip forwarding on my linux box but am not sure how to set it up on
solaris 10.
both nics work and have info in ifconfig included.
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
elxl0: flags=1104843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,ROUTER,IPv4>
mtu 1500 index 2
inet 24.99.23.81 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 24.99.23.25...
lsof 4.70D for Solaris 10 [was Re: Lsof on Solaris 10 x86?]Ian Northeast <ian@house-from-hell.demon.co.uk> writes:
>Has anyone tried this? When I try to build it (using gcc off the Solaris
>9 companion CD, either 3.2 or 2.95) it fails because it can't find
>c2/audit.h which is indeed missing - there is no /usr/include/c2. I've
>tried both 4.69 with the patch for Solaris 10 and the Solaris specific
>4.70C. I'm using the current build 44 of Solaris 10 x86.
>This looks like a Solaris build problem to me, not a fault in lsof.
>c2/audit.h is included from the Solaris header file sys/cred_impl.h.
>There is a...
Solaris 10 x86 Network install problemim trying to do a solaris 10 x86 network install, i've followed through
all the documentation step by step on docs.sun.com and when I boot off
of my network card it goes for a minute then errors "PXE E53: No boot
filename received" all the dhcp options and macros are set. BootFile
is set to "nbp.SUNW.i86pc" and tftp is setup. Please help, Thanks.
dacrud@gmail.com wrote:
> im trying to do a solaris 10 x86 network install, i've followed through
> all the documentation step by step on docs.sun.com and when I boot off
> of my network card it goes for a minu...
Solaris 10 x86Just realised that the install didnt ask me for any network settings
during the install...
Checked /etc/hosts and all thats there is the loopback address. How do
I set up networking now?
In article
<32e0fbd0-91e8-4871-8ed4-885cbcae6deb@g23g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>,
"BertieBigBollox@gmail.com" <bertiebigbollox@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just realised that the install didnt ask me for any network settings
> during the install...
>
> Checked /etc/hosts and all thats there is the loopback address. How do
> I set up networking now?
Does the system "see&quo...
Solaris 10 x86 network install problem #2im trying to do a solaris 10 x86 network install. when i boot off of
the client network card using PXE, it goes to the install, lets me
select type of install, configures devices, then right after "using
DHCP for network config information" it hangs on "NFS server
192.168.1.200 not responding still trying".
i've tryed restarting the services, and i can mount the
/export/home/installserver from other machines on the lan. DHCP is
working properly which i checked as well.
i've been working on this problem for a week now and cannot figure it
out. any help would be m...
Airlink ASOHORL network cardDoes anyone know if the Airlink ASOHORL 10/100 PCI Ethernet card work
with Solaris 10 in the x86 flavor?
Can't find any Airlink products in the HCL but I've found, in the past,
that isn't necessarily a bad thing.
TIA
Bill W
...
Solaris 10 x86 primary slave disk not detectedDear all,
I try to have 6 SATA disks on one x86 machine. However, the
primary slave disk cannot be detected. The disk can be
detected and functioned whatever SATA number other than
being a primary slave. And I think that other disks can not
be primary slave disk.
Is it correct or not? How to fix this problem?
Thanks in advance.
--
Johnson Chow
Mr. Chow Wing Siu <wschow@comp.hkbu.edu.hk> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I try to have 6 SATA disks on one x86 machine. However, the
> primary slave disk cannot be detected. The disk can be
> detected and functioned whatever SA...
elxl Network Interface Problems in Solaris 10 x86I have an x86 system running Solaris 10, current release, patched up
to Recommended patch level as of a couple of weeks ago.
After the system has been up a few hours, the 3c509c NIC (elxl0) seems
to simply fade out of existence. Network hangs, or becomes extremely
slow. Only a reboot brings it back to life, and then the process
repeats.
I thought this might be full/half duplex mismatched, and have tried
editing /kernel/drv/elxl.conf to force full duplex. This, however,
kills the NIC altogether: at boot time, it generates a rapid stream of
errors indicating the interface is not working at a...
I want to burn Solaris 10 for x86 dvd.iso and Solaris 10 companion dvd.iso in a DVD.Can you do it?if i can,how to do it?
Help me,please.^_^
wakeupearly wrote:
> Can you do it?if i can,how to do it?
> Help me,please.^_^
>
Isnt it something like:
cat cd1.iso cd2.iso cd3.iso > dvd.iso
i could be wrong, but I'm sure it's quite similar. :-)
--
-=//-\drian Thompson=-
wakeupearly wrote:
> Can you do it?if i can,how to do it?
What? Please state your question in the message, not in the subject.
> Help me,please.^_^
Read the information from the download section of
http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/get.jsp
...
Intel Quad ports LAN card for solaris 10 x86Hi all,
I would like to purchase an Intel Quad ports LAN card for
solaris 10 x86.
Would anyone like to propose one with supported or unsupported
network driver?
Thank you very much.
--
Johnson Chow
In article <hk8vsf$1na8$1@net44p.hkbu.edu.hk>,
Mr. Chow Wing Siu <Johnson.Chow@Comp.HKBU.Edu.HK> wrote:
>I would like to purchase an Intel Quad ports LAN card for
>solaris 10 x86.
I would be surprised if e1000g(7D) or igb(7D) didn't work with
Intel's quad-port Gb adapters.
<URL:http://www.intel.com/network/connectivity/products/server_adapters.htm>
John
groenv...
x86 Solaris 10 nic driver added but not attached. NIC is not detected.
I couldn't install my nic in solaris 10. I compiled and added
the driver but failed to attach the driver and ifconfig output
shows only loopback dev. Please see the following output and tell
me whether my nic has been detected and why the driver failed to
attach?
My nic is detected in linux as (#lspci output)
01:09.0 Ethernet controller: D-Link System Inc RTL8139 Ethernet (rev
10)
but getting the following output from my solaris 10;
/etc/path_to_inst file shows
"/pci@0,0/pci8086,244e@1e/pci1186,1300@9" 0 "rf"
and #prtconf -v shows
pci1186,1300 (driver not attached)...
[ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86Hi,all
ACE VERSION: 5.4.3
HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM:
Solaris10 X86
TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST:
COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL):
Compiler: SUN CC 5.6
Make: GNU make 3.80
CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h [if you use a link to a
platform-
specific file, simply state which one]:
#include "ace/config-sunos5.9.h"
CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU
(unless
this isn't used in this case, e.g., with Microsoft ...
[ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2Hi,
ACE VERSION: 5.4.3
HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM:
Solaris 10 x86
TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST:
COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL):
Sun Studio 9 (Sun CC 5.6)
CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/ace/config.h [if you use a link to a
platform-
specific file, simply state which one]:
#define ACE_HAS_STANDARD_CPP_LIBRARY 1
#define ACE_USES_STD_NAMESPACE_FOR_STDCPP_LIB 1
#include "ace/config-sunos5.9.h"
CONTENTS OF $ACE_ROOT/include/makeinclude/platform_macros.GNU
(unless
...
[ace-users] Re: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86Hi Jin,
>> The solaris 9/10 for sparc is not the same as solaris 9/10 for
>> Intel X86,although it is almost free,and the SunStudio 9 (CC
>> 5.6)for sparc is not the same as SunStudio 9(CC 5.6) for Intel X86.
This is yet one more reason why you'll need to do the legwork on
this. Please let us know what you find out.
Thanks,
Doug
--
Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt, Professor TEL: (615) 343-8197
Electrical Engineering and Computer Science FAX: (615) 343-7440
Vanderbilt University WEB: www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/
Nashvil...
[ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2Hi,all
I rebuild the ACE package according the instruction above,but get
the same result.
my platform_macros.GNU file has the following lines:
templates = implicit
include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU
When i rebuild the ACE library,get the following compile errors:
$ make inline=0 -j 2 -k -f GNUmakefile.ACE
....
....
CC -mt -g -DSUN_CC_HAS_PVFC_BUG
-I/export/home/hua/DevTools/ACE_wrappers -DACE_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
-DACE_NO_INLINE -I.. -DACE_HAS_ACE_TOKEN -DACE_HAS_ACE_SVCCONF
-DACE_BUILD_DLL -c -KPIC -o .shobj/OS_NS_sys_stat.o
OS_NS_sys_...
Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86Hi,
>> ACE VERSION: 5.4.3
Thakns for using the PRF!
>> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM:
>> Solaris10 X86
We (i.e., the DOC groups at UCI/VU/WU) don't have Solaris running on
an x86 box (yet). It would therefore be great if you could figure out
what patches need to be applied so that ACE compiles properly on this
platform.
BTW, Kitty/Bala, weren't we planning on running Solaris on an AMD box
at some point?
Thanks,
Doug
>> TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST:
>> COMPIL...
Solaris 10 x86 06/06 on Dell GX520 (with Intel 945G graphic card)Guys,
I've performed an End User installation of Solaris 10 x86 06/06 on a
Dell GX520.
It all went fine, I got a graphical login but it only works with CDE,
not with Gnome (if I select Gnome, it all goes black and then returns
to the graphical login screen).
I thought it might be something to do with the built-in graphic card
(Intel 945G) so with kdmconfig I swapped between Xorg and Xsun, but to
no avail.
Any idea what I am doing wrong here?
Thanks in advance
L
In <1152877104.531107.65720@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> "Ciccio" <lserena@gmail.com> writes:
>I&...
No internet connection w Solaris 10 on my x86Hi,
I don't want to bother you with questions about hot to configure the
ethernet card in solaris 10. I'm quite a newbie and I want it to learn
without spending thousands of $ in Solaris courses or so.
So my question is: do you know some URLs about Solaris tutorial in
plain Englisch, explaining step-by-step which component are well
suited, how to configure the internet (Ethernet card) etc.?
I was not able to find something at my level. My biggest problem is
how to connect my x86 pc with internet with a cable modem...
Thank you very much for your help
John
John wrote:
> Hi,
>...
Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2Hi Jin,
Thanks for using the PRF.
>> ACE VERSION: 5.4.3
>>
>> HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM:
>> Solaris 10 x86
>>
>> TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST:
>> COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL):
>> Sun Studio 9 (Sun CC 5.6)
As we've mentioned several times now, we don't have this compiler
installed yet on this hardware platform, so if you want things to be fixed
soon I recommend you figure out what's going wrong and send us the
patches. Otherwise, pl...
Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2Hi Jin,
>> I rebuild the ACE package according the instruction above,but get
>> the same result.
It doesn't look to me like you've added
-DACE_HAS_X86_STAT_MACROS
to the build-line as recommended by Johnny Willemsen.
>> my platform_macros.GNU file has the following lines:
>>
>> templates = implicit
>> include $(ACE_ROOT)/include/makeinclude/platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU
>>
>> When i rebuild the ACE library,get the following compile errors:
>> $ make inline=0 -j 2 -k -f GNUmakefile.ACE
>> ...
>&...
RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2Hi Steve,
> > Is this necessary? I mean make it implicit by default. The
> > explicit is
> > not even supported, and has no chance to work cleanly. Why
> > should we patch
> > broken stuff. Just a thought?
>
> At least for ACE 5.5, Riverace supports the Forte compiler that
> requires explicit. After that, we can drop it.
Ok. Steve, could you maybe make clear with the build names which builds use
explicit templates? Explicit templates in TAO are known to be broken at this
moment.
Johnny
...
Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2Johnny-
> Ok, the problem is in platform_sunos5_sunc++.GNU, when a not known forte
> version is found, it defaults to explicit. I am updating right now, for 4.2
> and 5.3 we default to explicit, for all others to implicit
Is this necessary? I mean make it implicit by default. The explicit is
not even supported, and has no chance to work cleanly. Why should we patch
broken stuff. Just a thought?
> Qinghuajin and other Forte 9 users, you can work around this by added the
> following line to your platform_macros.GNU file.
> templates = implicit
This is until w...
Re: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2Johnny-
> > > > ACE VERSION: 5.4.3
> > > >
> > > > HOST MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM:
> > > > Solaris10 X86
> > > > TARGET MACHINE and OPERATING SYSTEM, if different from HOST:
> > > > COMPILER NAME AND VERSION (AND PATCHLEVEL):
> > > > Compiler: SUN CC 5.6
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > I don't think the DOC group supports this compiler anymore.. More
> > particularly this compiler is buggy and you may land up with
...
RE: [ace-users]: ACE 5.4.2 and ACE 5.4.3 compile failed on Solaris 9 x86 and Solaris 10 x86 #2> Ok. Steve, could you maybe make clear with the build names
> which builds use explicit templates?
I'll try to get this clarified.
> Explicit templates in TAO are known to be broken at this
> moment.
None of the tests at Riverace try to build TAO.
-Steve
...
Post |
Groups |
Users |
Stream |
Browse |
About |
|
Permalink
kona_iron
See related articles to this posting
25821 articles. 
88 followers. 
2 Replies
1481 Views