Dear Group,
I'm currently logging syslog messages from several boxes to my admin machine
(using the loghost directive in /etc/hosts).
What would be the easiest way of securing the information against
eavesdropping? I don't trust the network, and would sooner not have every
error message being subject to snoop.
I figured tunnelling through SSH would be the way to go, but I've no idea
where to start.
Could someone point me in the right direction, or better yet provide a
solution (bearing in mind I'm still finding my Unix legs)...
Many thanks,
Gareth Crispin
DCS Engineer
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Gareth
|
9/4/2003 4:52:22 AM |
|
Gareth Crispin wrote:
> Dear Group,
>
> I'm currently logging syslog messages from several boxes to my admin
> machine (using the loghost directive in /etc/hosts).
>
> What would be the easiest way of securing the information against
> eavesdropping? I don't trust the network, and would sooner not have every
> error message being subject to snoop.
>
> I figured tunnelling through SSH would be the way to go, but I've no idea
> where to start.
>
For stuff Sun documentation is not likely to cover, I generally find that
Google is a good place to start. Searching the web or the groups often find
answers or ideas that work well.
> Could someone point me in the right direction, or better yet provide a
> solution (bearing in mind I'm still finding my Unix legs)...
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Gareth Crispin
> DCS Engineer
If you want to use ssh, you may try adapting this:
http://www.frozenblue.net/tools/howtos/?v=ssh-tunnel
You can find the port for syslog in /etc/services. You can also search for
how to set this up with ssh passwordless login but you will need to
understand the risks in doing so.
Of course, the link above was just the first link I found in a google
search. You may be able to find others.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
mjt
|
9/4/2003 5:56:00 AM
|
|
In article <bj6gf0$fhj$1@news8.svr.pol.co.uk>,
"Gareth Crispin" <askme@please.com> writes:
> Dear Group,
>
> I'm currently logging syslog messages from several boxes to my admin machine
> (using the loghost directive in /etc/hosts).
>
> What would be the easiest way of securing the information against
> eavesdropping? I don't trust the network, and would sooner not have every
> error message being subject to snoop.
Create an IPsec tunnel between the machines, and direct the syslog
messages to the tunnel. (Could use the tunnel for all traffic between
the machines.)
--
Andrew Gabriel
Consultant Software Engineer
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
andrew
|
9/4/2003 9:25:28 AM
|
|
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 05:52:22 +0100, "Gareth Crispin" <askme@please.com>
wrote:
>Dear Group,
>
>I'm currently logging syslog messages from several boxes to my admin machine
>(using the loghost directive in /etc/hosts).
>
>What would be the easiest way of securing the information against
>eavesdropping? I don't trust the network, and would sooner not have every
>error message being subject to snoop.
>
>I figured tunnelling through SSH would be the way to go, but I've no idea
>where to start.
>
>Could someone point me in the right direction, or better yet provide a
>solution (bearing in mind I'm still finding my Unix legs)...
>
>Many thanks,
>
>Gareth Crispin
>DCS Engineer
>
There is also a recent article in sysadmin mag about replacing the UDP
syslog with a TCP/IP based encrypted perl-message-thingy. It could
give you some ideas.
Unifying Web Clusters with Spread
http://www.samag.com/documents/s=7789/sam0302a/0302a.htm
Oh wait, somebody went and did all the work for you:
Remote System Logs via SSH
http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1149/sam0106s/0106s.htm
BTW, I don't think your syslog is that interesting enough to snoop.
I'd much rather read your email.
CA
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Captain
|
9/5/2003 8:33:58 AM
|
|
Hello Gareth,
Am Thu, 4 Sep 2003 05:52:22 +0100
schrieb "Gareth Crispin" <askme@please.com>:
> Could someone point me in the right direction, or better yet provide a
> solution (bearing in mind I'm still finding my Unix legs)...
I'm using tunneling with zebedee (blowfish encryption), which uses
somekind of public/private-key authentication for using the tunnel.
Stunnel for X.509 certificates should also work fine. You can use your old
style syslog with UDP tunneling (but not with stunnel !). But I
recommended the better way on using syslog-ng and syslog-over-tcp. There
are some websites out there providing detailed information howto use this
tools. Works fine with more than 40 servers here.
> Many thanks,
> Gareth Crispin
> DCS Engineer
cu
Dave
--
Against TCPA - nothing fights like the opposition
http://www.againsttcpa.com
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
David
|
9/5/2003 9:29:23 AM
|
|
"Gareth Crispin" <askme@please.com> writes:
>I'm currently logging syslog messages from several boxes to my admin machine
>(using the loghost directive in /etc/hosts).
>What would be the easiest way of securing the information against
>eavesdropping? I don't trust the network, and would sooner not have every
>error message being subject to snoop.
What about using ipsec if only specifically for syslog messages?
All standard with Solaris 9.
Casper
--
Expressed in this posting are my opinions. They are in no way related
to opinions held by my employer, Sun Microsystems.
Statements on Sun products included here are not gospel and may
be fiction rather than truth.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Casper
|
9/5/2003 10:12:55 AM
|
|
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 05:52:22 +0100 "Gareth Crispin" <askme@please.com> wrote:
> Dear Group,
>
> I'm currently logging syslog messages from several boxes to my admin machine
> (using the loghost directive in /etc/hosts).
>
> What would be the easiest way of securing the information against
> eavesdropping? I don't trust the network, and would sooner not have every
> error message being subject to snoop.
I would go with IPSec.
/fc
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
Reply
|
Frank
|
9/5/2003 11:39:39 PM
|
|
|
6 Replies
173 Views
(page loaded in 0.118 seconds)
Similiar Articles:7/10/2012 2:57:56 AM
|