f



Read again about my Parallel archiver...

Hello.....

Read again about my Parallel archiver...

My Parallel archiver version 3.6 is here..

I have added one of the best compression algorithm that is the Zstandard 
- A stronger compression algorithm, read about it here:

http://fastcompression.blogspot.ca/2015/01/zstd-stronger-compression-algorithm.html

Now my Parallel archiver supports the following Parallel compression 
algorithms:

Parallel LZO , Parallel LZ4 , Parallel Zlib , Parallel Bzip , Parallel 
LZMA and Parallel Zstd compression algorithms for both the 32 bit and 64 
bit compilers.

And now my Parallel archiver is NUMA-aware and NUMA efficient and it 
minimizes efficiently the contention and it scales well.

I have thoroughly tested and stabilized more my parallel archiver for 
many years, and now i think that it is more stable and efficient, so i 
think that you can be more confident with it.

Important note:

Notice that i have not used a global password , but every file can be 
encrypted with a different password using my Parallel AES encryption 
with 256 bit keys. So the security level is this:

- When you encrypt , the content of the files will be encrypted but the 
names of the files and directories will not be encrypted, But if you 
want to encrypt also the names of the files and directories using 
Parallel AES encryption with 256 bit keys, please compress first into an 
archive, and after that encrypt all the archive into another archive.

- But when you encrypt , you can update the files with the update() 
method without giving the right password, and you can delete the files 
without giving the right password, but my level of security is that you 
can not access the encrypted data without giving the right password.
You can download my new version 3.6 of my Parallel archiver from:

https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/parallel-archiver


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
0
Ramine
8/5/2016 5:54:56 PM
comp.compression 4696 articles. 0 followers. Post Follow

0 Replies
641 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 28

Reply: