Hi. Hopefully you will see the code and see what I'm trying to do, and see the problem. The loop seems messy, but my method to help with eye strain is to match up the do-end's down an imaginary column... ie: array.each # do # |i| puts i # # <-imaginary column # end # ##### So here's the code. ########### def foo(argument1, argument2) #1 user = [2,5] user.each do |bar| output = [] #2 argument1.each do |i| #3 if i.parent.id == bar.id #4 output << i.parent.name end end argument2.each do |i| if i.parent.id == bar.id output << i.name end end return output end Comments: #1 - argument comes in as arrays #2 - let's setup the var that will return the array of collected data #3 - i think this is where the problem may lie. #4 - parent is an acts_as_tree method inside rails, just grabs the parant. notice how i call the iterating variable 'bar' inside this new loop..is this legal? My intuition tells me there's probably a better method to do this. Any comments, suggestions would be appreciated. Dominic -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Dominic Son wrote: >Hi. Hopefully you will see the code and see what I'm trying to do, and >see the problem. The loop seems messy, but my method to help with eye >strain is to match up the do-end's down an imaginary column... ie: > >array.each # do # |i| > puts i # # <-imaginary column > # end # > >##### So here's the code. ########### > >def foo(argument1, argument2) #1 >user = [2,5] > >user.each do |bar| >output = [] #2 >argument1.each do |i| #3 > > if i.parent.id == bar.id #4 > output << i.parent.name > end > end > > argument2.each do |i| > if i.parent.id == bar.id > output << i.name > end > end >return output > end > >Comments: >#1 - argument comes in as arrays >#2 - let's setup the var that will return the array of collected data >#3 - i think this is where the problem may lie. >#4 - parent is an acts_as_tree method inside rails, just grabs the >parant. > notice how i call the iterating variable 'bar' inside this new >loop..is this legal? > >My intuition tells me there's probably a better method to do this. Any >comments, suggestions would be appreciated. > >Dominic > > > First, your code is missing an end. Second, making the end to the block start is easy with the standard convention (with the missing end added in) def foo(argument1, argument2) #1 user = [2,5] user.each do |bar| output = [] #2 argument1.each do |i| #3 if i.parent.id == bar.id #4 output << i.parent.name end end end argument2.each do |i| if i.parent.id == bar.id output << i.name end end output end This is infinitely easier (to me, and 99.9% of programmers) than moving the end out to match the do. Do you find this hard to read? You seem to have no problem matching the end to its matching if.
On 1/11/07, Mike Harris <GENIE@prodigy.net> wrote: > Dominic Son wrote: > > >Hi. Hopefully you will see the code and see what I'm trying to do, and > >see the problem. The loop seems messy, but my method to help with eye > >strain is to match up the do-end's down an imaginary column... ie: > > > >array.each # do # |i| > > puts i # # <-imaginary column > > # end # > > > >##### So here's the code. ########### > > > >def foo(argument1, argument2) #1 > >user = [2,5] > > > >user.each do |bar| > >output = [] #2 > >argument1.each do |i| #3 > > > > if i.parent.id == bar.id #4 > > output << i.parent.name > > end > > end > > > > argument2.each do |i| > > if i.parent.id == bar.id > > output << i.name > > end > > end > >return output > > end > > > >Comments: > >#1 - argument comes in as arrays > >#2 - let's setup the var that will return the array of collected data > >#3 - i think this is where the problem may lie. > >#4 - parent is an acts_as_tree method inside rails, just grabs the > >parant. > > notice how i call the iterating variable 'bar' inside this new > >loop..is this legal? > > > >My intuition tells me there's probably a better method to do this. Any > >comments, suggestions would be appreciated. > > > >Dominic > > > > > > > First, your code is missing an end. Second, making the end to the block > start is easy with the standard convention > > This is infinitely easier (to me, and 99.9% of programmers) than moving > the end out to match the do. Do you find this hard to read? You seem > to have no problem matching the end to its matching if. 1. The main question: is this legal - yes, it's perfectly legal, it's one of the blocks' features. The blocks are closures, i.e. they keep they outer context. This is used when you pass a block between functions: def fun2 yield 10 end def fun1 a= 5 puts fun2 do |i| # yield 10 will set i=10 i + a # here block has access to a even though it is called from fun2 end # => 15 end 2. few changes to the code: (I changed bar.id to just bar - it seems to me that's what you want) def foo(argument1, argument2) user = [2,5] output = [] user.each do |bar| output += argument1.select{|i| i.parent.id == bar}.map{|i| i.parent.name} output += argument2.select{|i| i.parent.id == bar}.map{|i| i.name} end output end see Enumerable#select, Enumerable#map for explanation. shortly: "from argument1 array select those that fulfill the condition and for each of them get i.parent.name"
Are you sure your code does what you want? It looks like your "user.each" block returns after the first iteration and never gets to the second one. It might help if you formatted your code in a more conventional way in your post. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.